LEMBAR PERSETUJUAN DOKUMEN

PROSES SURAT / DOKUMEN DARI KONSEPTOR

DAN PEJABAT YANG TERKAIT

No. Dokumen : 61/PHI72120/2023-SO

Perihal : Geological Program SEM – 44 OS 3
PIC : Rangga Mahardika Khairully / Fetty Maria Naibaho
Proposal Sumur Pengeboran terlampir telah diperiksa dan diteliti secara hierarki serta diparaf oleh para pejabat
terkait yang bertanggung jawab untuk ditandatangani oleh pejabat yang berwenang, antara lain:

Diteruskan Kepada:
No. Tanggal Paraf Keterangan
Nama & Jabatan

Bagus Dwi Cahya/

Rangga Mahardika Khairully
1. 12 Juni 2024 Konseptor
GGR Well Operation &
Petrophysics

Fetty Maria Naibaho /

Dhimas Aditya Nugraha
2. Konseptor
GGR Subsurface Development
Area 2

Hendra Halomoan Pasaribu

Manager Well Operation,
3. Peninjau
Petrophysics & Data
Management

Ade Lukman
4. Manager Subsurface Peninjau
Development Area 2

Susan Syahdina
5. Sr. Manager Subsurface Mengetahui
Development & Planning Zona 9

Catatan:
• Lembar persetujuan dokumen ini merupakan satu kesatuan dengan dokumentasi yang dirujuk.
• Nomor dan tanggal dokumen untuk dilengkapi kemudian setelah konsep dokumen ditandatangani oleh pejabat
yang bersangkutan.
GEOLOGICAL PROGRAM
SEM - 44 OS 3

Semberah Field, Kalimantan Timur

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
Pertamina Hulu Indonesia Region 3 Zone 9
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. WELL GENERALITIES ............................................................................................................. 4

2. SUBSURFACE INFORMATION ................................................................................................ 5

2.1. Reservoir Summary ........................................................................................................ 5

2.2. Geological Review........................................................................................................... 6
3. DRILLING HAZARDS.............................................................................................................. 13

3.1. Risk and Hazard Summary ........................................................................................... 13

3.2. Pore Pressure & Fracture Gradient Prediction ............................................................. 14
3.3. High Gas at Shallow Section ......................................................................................... 15
4. WELL TD DEFINITION ............................................................................................................ 16

4.1. Casing Point 13-3/8” Correlation ................................................................................... 17

4.2. Casing Point 9-5/8” Correlation ..................................................................................... 18
4.3. Well TD Correlation ....................................................................................................... 19
5. FORMATION EVALUATION PROGRAM ............................................................................... 20

6. OUTLINE WELL SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 21

Geological Program | SEM - 44 OS 3 2|Page

 LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Well Location SEM - 44 OS 3 ..................................................................................................... 4

Figure 2. Well Correlation for SEM - 44 OS 3 with Surrounding Well ........................................................ 6

Figure 3. Well Correlation for SEM - 44 OS 3 with Surrounding Well on Layer E090C/D (#T1) ............... 7

Figure 4. Well Correlation for SEM - 44 OS 3 with Surrounding Well on Layer G080A (#T2) ................... 8

Figure 5. Well Correlation for SEM - 44 OS 3 with Surrounding Well on Layer I072A (#T3) .................... 9

Figure 6. Well Correlation for SEM - 44 OS 3 with Surrounding Well on Layer I078A (#T4) .................. 10

Figure 7. Well Correlation for SEM - 44 OS 3 with Surrounding Well on Layer I080B and I080C (#T5 &
#T6) ........................................................................................................................................................... 11

Figure 8. Well Correlation for SEM - 44 OS 3 with Surrounding Well on Layer I099A (#T7) .................. 12

Figure 9. Pore Pressure Prediction SEM - 44 OS 3 ................................................................................. 14

Figure 10. High Gas at Shallow Section with Surrounding Well SEM - 44 OS 3 ..................................... 15

Figure 11. Well Trajectory Plan SEM - 44 OS 3....................................................................................... 16

Figure 12. Casing Point 13-3/8” Correlation SEM - 44 OS 3 ................................................................... 17

Figure 13. Casing Point 9-5/8” Correlation SEM - 44 OS 3 ..................................................................... 18

Figure 14. Final TD Well Correlation SEM - 44 OS 3 .............................................................................. 19

Figure 15. Well Summary SEM - 44 OS 3 ............................................................................................... 21

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. Reservoir Summary SEM - 44 OS 3………………………………………………………………… 5

LIST OF ENCLOSURES

Enclosure 1. Reservoir Prognosis SEM - 44 OS 3 .................................................................................. 23

Enclosure 2. Offset Well Summary SEM - 44 OS 3 ................................................................................ 24

Enclosure 3. High Gas at Shallow Interval .............................................................................................. 28

Geological Program | SEM - 44 OS 3 3|Page

 1. WELL GENERALITIES

GENERAL INFORMATION

Well Name SEM - 44 OS 3

Field Semberah

Structure Semberah

Well Type Development

Trajectory Type Directional (S type)

Trajectory Orientation Quadrant 1

Rig Name EMR-01

KB Elevation 117.21 ft above MSL

GL Elevation 91.21 ft above MSL Figure 1. Well Location SEM - 44 OS 3

Est. TD Depth 8073 ftTVDSS

COORDINATE LOCATION

X: 538808 E X: 538822 E
SSP: BHL:
Y: 9977941 N Y: 9977998 N

Datum Bessel 1841, UTM Zone 50 South

WELL OBJECTIVE

Maximize oil and gas production from E, G, and I series zone. The estimated incremental recoverable
reserves (2P) is 1.59 BSCF gas equivalent, with an expected production rate of 77 BOPD and 0.7 -
1.5 MMSCFD.

Geological Program | SEM - 44 OS 3 4|Page

 2. SUBSURFACE INFORMATION

2.1. Reservoir Summary

Table 1. Reservoir Summary SEM - 44 OS 3

Geological Program | SEM - 44 OS 3 5|Page

2.2. Geological Review

Figure 2. Well Correlation for SEM - 44 OS 3 with Surrounding Well

Geological Program | SEM - 44 OS 3 6|Page

 Figure 3. Well Correlation for SEM - 44 OS 3 with Surrounding Well on Layer E090C/D (#T1)

Geological Program | SEM - 44 OS 3 7|Page

 Figure 4. Well Correlation for SEM - 44 OS 3 with Surrounding Well on Layer G080A (#T2)

Geological Program | SEM - 44 OS 3 8|Page

 Figure 5. Well Correlation for SEM - 44 OS 3 with Surrounding Well on Layer I072A (#T3)

Geological Program | SEM - 44 OS 3 9|Page

 Figure 6. Well Correlation for SEM - 44 OS 3 with Surrounding Well on Layer I078A (#T4)

Geological Program | SEM - 44 OS 3 10 | P a g e

 Figure 7. Well Correlation for SEM - 44 OS 3 with Surrounding Well on Layer I080B and I080C (#T5 & #T6)

Geological Program | SEM - 44 OS 3 11 | P a g e

 Figure 8. Well Correlation for SEM - 44 OS 3 with Surrounding Well on Layer I099A (#T7)

Geological Program | SEM - 44 OS 3 12 | P a g e

 3. DRILLING HAZARDS

3.1. Risk and Hazard Summary

Inherent Risk Residual Risk
Subject Impact Mitigation
H M L H M L
Offset Well

Review geological report and drilling history for all wells are SEM-159,
Subsurface anomaly while drilling that can change the
√ SEM-44, SEM-47, SEM-47S, SEM-74, SEM-27, SEM-70, SEM-105, √
well design/program
SEM-167, SEM-122 ( Primary Data).

Well stability issues were recorded from SEM-159, SEM-44, SEM-70,

SEM-27, SEM-105, and SEM-167. These conditions will be mitigated by
increasing the mud weight when a wellbore stability issue is
Wellbore stability issue √ encountered. Especially in cases of wireline logging tools getting stuck, √
mitigation strategies will include adjusting the trajectory plan, adjusting
the casing point plan, and optimizing the logging program (Triple Combo
& PTFA)

surrounding wells (SEM-159, SEM-44, SEM-47, SEM 70, SEM-74, SEM-

Drilling History 27, SEM-105, and SEM-167) with range TG 51U-2200 U from coal and
64U-180 U from Sandstone. it is cured by applying 9.5-11 ppg MW.
The gas analysis from the reference well (SEM 27, SEM 44, SEM 47,
SEM 70, and SEM 74) with high value gas reading used QGM gas
Experience gain/kick/flowing & High gas while drilling
√ sensor, while SEM 44 OS 3 will use CVD sensor. It is impacted on true √
offset wells
lower gas reading. No risk of shallow gas from surrounding well event
history.

a depth of more than 7500 ft. This condition will be anticipated by

directly increase mudweight before entering it.

Experienced losses were recorded from SEM-47S (Layer E-90C, MW

10 ppg) and SEM-70 (Layer I-087A, MW 10 ppg), Potential losses will
Experience loss/ballooning while drilling offset wells √ √
be handled by controlling mud weight and ECD, and also by applying
LCM in the system.

Determine a proper casing point √ Well to well correlation within radius less than 1 km. √

Ensure the target depth √ Perform well to well correlation from surface and check daily correlation. √
Stratigraphic and Structural
Correlation
Analyzing from survey and trajctory and radius of target to ensure that
Miss the well trajectory √ our well on the track. Update trajectory plan with actual trajectory day by √
day.

Review BHG (Bore Hole Geometry) from open hole logging, run the CBL
Cement Bound Log √ √
(Cement Bond Log) logs with PE and Drilling Engineer.

Cementing There is no loss while cementing recorded from surrounding wells.

Depleted reservoir can induce loss while cementing. Update PPFG
Loss while cementing √ √
before cementing will give fracture pressure condition before cementing
job, so Drilling Engineer can decide appropriate cement weight.

Seismic data

Structural analysis and encounter fault that potentially This well is going to penetrate Semberah structure.
√ √
cause loss while drilling or stability issue Correlate seimic marker in detail from surface to TD.
Seismic analysis
Velocity analysis to recognize distribution of Overpressure feature can be seen clearly from velocity model and it's
√ √
overpressure distribution has been mapped.

Overlay well location (trajectory well) with high gas at shallow section
history with observation from mudlog and drilling history from
High Gas Pocket at Shallow surrounding / offset wells. From surrounding wells SEM-159, SEM-44,
Encounter unexpected high gas, kick or blow-out √ √
Section SEM-47, SEM 70, SEM-74, SEM-27, SEM-105, and SEM-167 are
showing evidence high gas issues from shallow section history but no
risk of shallow gas from surrounding well event history.

Pressure Regime

There are three potential losses due to PPFG calculation. First potential
loss estimated at 3641 ftTVDSS with FG 10.5 ppg E-90C, second
potential loss estimated at 6283 ft TVDSS with FG 13.42 ppg (G-80A,
third potential loss estimated at 6571 ftTVDSS with FG 13.48 ppg (I-
Potential loss √ 71A), fourth potential loss estimated at 7167 ftTVDSS with FG 13.44 ppg √
Depleted Reservoir (I-83A), fifth potential loss estimated at 7910 ftTVDSS with FG 13.1 ppg
(I-99A). This condition will be anticipated by control drilling parameter,
flow rate, analyze permeability, lowering MW/ECD, mixing LCM in
system and spot cement will be applied in this section.

Low productivity due to formation damage √ Update all pressure data by taking pressure test in pay zones. √

By offset well history, high gas and other hazardous gas (connection
Encounter unexpected high gas reservoir/coal, kick or gas, swab gas, wiper trip gas, trip) are occured in several reference
√ √
blow-out wells. Applying LCT (Long Connection Test), Circulating & Increasing
High Pressure Reservoir Mudweight gradually are solution to mitigate it.

This well trajectory will penetrate transition overpressure estimated at ±

Overpressure √ √
7044 ftTVDSS. Porepressure in TD plan estimate 10.52 ppg.

Geological Program | SEM - 44 OS 3 13 | P a g e

3.2. Pore Pressure & Fracture Gradient Prediction

Figure 9. Pore Pressure Prediction SEM - 44 OS 3

Geological Program | SEM - 44 OS 3 14 | P a g e

3.3. High Gas at Shallow Section

Figure 10. High Gas at Shallow Section with Surrounding Well SEM - 44 OS 3

Geological Program | SEM - 44 OS 3 15 | P a g e

 4. WELL TD DEFINITION

WELL TD STRATEGY

12-1/4” Hole Section

• Directionally drilled
• Azimuth 13.80 deg and maximum
inclination 10.34 deg
• Est. CP 13-3/8” Plan at ± 2930 ftTVDSS.
Estimate ±95 ft thick of shale below
D0830.TZ

• Vertically drilled
• Hit six reservoir zone targets.
• Est. CP 9-5/8” Plan at ± 7370 ftTVDSS.
Estimate ±40 ft thick of shale below
I0880.TZ
Figure 11. Well Trajectory Plan SEM - 44 OS 3

8-1/2” Hole Section

Drill 110 ft Rat Hole

After Last Target (I099A)

Continue as per original

program TD after 110 ft rat
hole

• Vertically drilled
• Hit one reservoir zone target.
• Est. final well TD at ± 8073 ftTVDSS
(Bottom SST Last Target (I099A) +
Rathole 110 ft)

Geological Program | SEM - 44 OS 3 16 | P a g e

4.1. Casing Point 13-3/8” Correlation

Figure 12. Casing Point 13-3/8” Correlation SEM - 44 OS 3

Geological Program | SEM - 44 OS 3 17 | P a g e

4.2. Casing Point 9-5/8” Correlation

Figure 13. Casing Point 9-5/8” Correlation SEM - 44 OS 3

Geological Program | SEM - 44 OS 3 18 | P a g e

4.3. Well TD Correlation

Figure 14. Final TD Well Correlation SEM - 44 OS 3

Geological Program | SEM - 44 OS 3 19 | P a g e

 5. FORMATION EVALUATION PROGRAM

Formation
Hole Size BHA/MWD-LWD Wireline Log
Evaluation

17-1/2" Motor BHA + MWD Mudlogging N/A

Quad Combo
(GR + Res + NeutronDen + Sonic)
12-1/4" Motor BHA + MWD Mudlogging PT/FA
Cased Hole Logging
(GR-CBL-CCL-VDL)
Quad Combo
(GR + Res + NeutronDen + Sonic)
8-1/2" Motor BHA + MWD Mudlogging PT/FA
Cased Hole Logging
(GR-CBL-CCL-VDL)

Geological Program | SEM - 44 OS 3 20 | P a g e

 6. OUTLINE WELL SUMMARY

Est.
Casing Depth Depth Netpay Por Perm
Zone Type Pressure Logging Program Precaution
ftTVDSS ftTVDSS ppg ft dec mD

17-1/2" Phase
High gas at shallow section
Mudlogging
CP 13-3/8”
± 2930 ftTVDSS 3470 E090C/D-01 O 3.70 41 0.24 195

6225 G080A-05 G 1.5 5 0.15 25

12-1/4" Phase Depleted Reservoir
6497 I072A-06 G 5.7 7 0.17 50 Mudlogging Potential Loss
Quad combo Sloughing Shale
6871 I078A-06 G 6.4 8 0.09 10 PT/FA Overpull / Tight Spot
GR-CBL-CCL-VDL Stuck / Packoff
6992 I080B-8 G 5.2 13 0.15 30

7027 I080C-08 G 6.7 12 0.12 18

CP 9-5/8”
± 7370 ftTVDSS Depleted Reservoir
8-1/2” Phase
Potential Loss
7910 I099A-3 G 1.0 53 0.11 15 Mudlogging
High Gas
Quad combo
Sloughing shale
PT/FA
Overpull / Tigh spot
GR-CBL-CCL-VDL
Stuck / packoff
Well TD 8-1/2”
Est. Depth SEM 44 OS 3
± 8073 ftTVDSS SSP : UTM X 538808 E; UTM Y 9977941 N
BHL : UTM X 538822 E; UTM Y 9977998 N

Figure 15. Well Summary SEM - 44 OS 3

Geological Program | SEM - 44 OS 3 21 | P a g e

ENCLOSURES
RESERVOIR PROGNOSIS
Enclosure 1. Reservoir Prognosis SEM - 44 OS 3

OFFSET WELL SUMMARY

Geological Program | SEM - 44 OS 3 23 | P a g e

 Enclosure 2. Offset Well Summary SEM - 44 OS 3

Geological Program | SEM - 44 OS 3 24 | P a g e

Geological Program | SEM - 44 OS 3 25 | P a g e
Geological Program | SEM - 44 OS 3 26 | P a g e
Geological Program | SEM - 44 OS 3 27 | P a g e
HIGH GAS AT SHALLOW SECTION
Enclosure 3. High Gas at Shallow Interval
Well Interval Max Gas Background Gas Mud Weight Remarks Year
SEM-0440 310 124 98 200 5-10 ? Gas from coal 2004
SEM-0440 620 434 408 105 5-10 9.5 Gas from coal 2004
SEM-0440 1060 874 848 220 5-10 9.5 Gas from coal 2004
SEM-0440 1100 914 888 600 25 9.5 Gas from coal 2004
SEM-0440 1185 999 973 200 25 9.5 Gas from coal 2004
SEM-0440 1360 1174 1148 310 25 9.5 Gas from coal 2004
SEM-0440 1510 1324 1298 130 25 9.5 Gas from coal 2004
SEM-0440 1610 1424 1398 105 25 9.5 Gas from coal 2004
SEM-0470 700 552 527 600 20 9.8 Gas from coal 1993
SEM-0470 1150 1002 977 200 20 9.8 Gas from coal 1993
SEM-0470 1250 1102 1077 150 20 9.8 Gas from coal 1993
SEM-0470 1300 1152 1127 400 20 9.8 Gas from coal 1993
SEM-0470 1430 1282 1257 2200 80 9.8 Gas from coal 1993
SEM-0470 1860 1712 1687 950 80 9.8 Gas from coal 1993
SEM-0470 1860 1711 1686 250 20 9.5 Gas from Coal 1993
SEM-0700 980 980 808 104 15 9.5 Gas from Sandstone 2004
SEM-0700 1175 1175 1003 111 15 9.5 Gas from Sandstone 2004
SEM-0700 1190 1093 1018 119 15 9.5 Gas from Coal 2004
SEM-0700 1730 1192 1559 126 15 9.5 Gas from Coal 2004
SEM-0700 1770 1771 1599 247 15 9.5 Gas from Coal 2004
SEM-0700 1850 1851 1679 180 15 9.5 Gas from Sandstone 2004
SEM-0700 2085 2086 1914 168 15 9.5 Gas from Coal 2004
SEM-0700 2190 2191 2019 299 15 9.5 Gas from Coal 2004
SEM-0700 2350 2351 2179 217 15 9.5 Gas from Coal 2004
SEM-0700 2620 2621 2449 474 15 9.5 Gas from Coal 2004
SEM-0700 2670 2671 2499 318 15 9.5 Gas from Coal 2004
SEM-0740 718 718 612 126 10 10 Gas from Coal 2005
SEM-0740 760 760 654 149 10 10 Gas from Coal 2005
SEM-0740 1820 1820 1714 214 20 10 Gas from Coal 2005
SEM-0740 1870 1870 1764 395 20 10 Gas from Coal 2005
SEM-0740 1990 1990 1884 943 50 10 Gas from Coal 2005
SEM-0740 2045 2045 1939 584 50 10 Gas from Coal 2005
SEM-0740 2145 2145 2039 1003 50 10 Gas from Coal 2005
SEM-0740 2170 2170 2064 114 20 10 Gas from Sandstone 2005
SEM-0740 2200 2200 2094 406 20 10 Gas from Coal 2005
SEM-0740 2350 2350 2244 135 20 10 Gas from Coal 2005
SEM-0270 797 797 670 1500 15 9.6 Gas from Coal 1985
SEM-0270 840 840 714 240 5 9.6 Gas from Coal 1985
SEM-0270 1290 1290 1163 120 20 9.6 Gas from Coal 1985
SEM-0270 1578 1578 1451 240 30 9.6 Gas from Coal 1985
SEM-0270 1700 1700 1573 750 50 9.6 Gas from Coal 1985
SEM-0270 1840 1840 1713 800 50 9.6 Gas from Coal 1985
SEM-0270 1860 1860 1733 875 50 9.6 Gas from Coal 1985
SEM-0270 2190 2190 2063 225 50 9.5 Gas from Coal 1986
SEM-0270 2290 2290 2163 245 50 9.5 Gas from Coal 1987
SEM-0270 2620 2620 2493 195 30 9.5 Gas from Coal 1988

Geological Program | SEM - 44 OS 3

28 | P a g e
 Well Interval Max Gas Background Gas Mud Weight Remarks Year
SEM-1590 1184 1184 1170 158 10-20 10.83 Gas from Coal 2023
SEM-1590 1252 1252 1234 131 10-20 10.71 Gas from Coal 2023
SEM-1590 1373 1373 1347 174 20-30 10.77 Gas from Coal 2023
SEM-1590 1480 1480 1445 178 20-30 10.71 Gas from Coal 2023
SEM-1590 2853 2853 2642 147 25-30 10.82 Gas from Coal 2023
SEM-1670 1405 1405 1215 59 15 10.8 Gas from Coal 2023
SEM-1670 1440 1440 1250 81 20 10.8 Gas from Coal 2023
SEM-1670 1514 1514 1323 51 10 10.8 Gas from Coal 2023
SEM-1670 1619 1619 1428 55 10 10.8 Gas from Coal 2023
SEM-1670 2082 2080 1890 102 5 10.8 Gas from Coal 2023
SEM-1670 2361 2355 2165 64 20 10.9 Gas from Sandstone 2023
SEM-1670 2492 2483 2293 58 20 10.9 Gas from Coal 2023
SEM-1670 2573 2562 2371 121 20 10.9 Gas from Coal 2023
SEM-1670 2659 2645 2455 92 15 10.9 Gas from Coal 2023
SEM-1670 2772 2754 2564 113 20 10.9 Gas from Coal 2023
SEM-1670 2928 2905 2715 78 15 11 Gas from Coal 2023
SEM-1670 2981 2956 2766 78 10 11 Gas from Coal 2023
SEM-1670 3335 3299 3108 114 20 10.3 Gas from Coal 2023
SEM-1670 3348 3312 3121 63 20 10.3 Gas from Coal 2023

Geological Program | SEM - 44 OS 3

29 | P a g e