0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views

Hhe QC WP 016

PT PROCEDURE

Uploaded by

omar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views

Hhe QC WP 016

PT PROCEDURE

Uploaded by

omar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

Hesham Helal El Sewedy & Partners For Steel Industries Co. Ltd.

(energya steel)

Liquid Penetration Examination (PT)


Document:
HHE-QC-WP-016

Page 1 of 8
Hesham Helal El Sewedy & Partners For Steel Industries Co. Ltd.
(energya steel)

Liquid Penetration Examination (PT)


Document:
HHE-QC-WP-016
Issue/Rev.
B/1
1. Scope:
This Test method covers procedures for penetrant examination of butt and fillet weld with the
associated HAZ on the parent metal and components. They are non-destructive testing methods for
detecting discontinuities that are open to the surface such as cracks, porosity and lack of fusion by
liquid penetrant testing conducted in accordance with the requirements of the referenced Codes and
Standards.

2. Purpose:

The purpose of this procedure is to explain the method of applying the liquid penetration non
destructive test.

3. References:
1.1. ASME Code Section V -applicable edition/addenda.

1.2. ASME Code Section I -applicable edition/addenda.

1.3. ASME Code Section VIII, Div1-applicable edition/addenda.

1.4. ANSI/ASME B31.1, B31.3 applicable edition/addenda.

1.5. National Board Inspection Code, NBIC-23, applicable edition.

1.6. AWS D1.1 - applicable edition.

1.7. ASTM-E165-Standard Test Method for Liquid Penetrant Examination.

1.8. Clients specification requirements for acceptance criteria.

1.9. Written Practice No. HHE-QC-WP-015.

….In case of conflict between Code requirements and Client’s specifications, Code requirements
shall prevail.

Page 2 of 8
Hesham Helal El Sewedy & Partners For Steel Industries Co. Ltd.
(energya steel)

Liquid Penetration Examination (PT)


Document:
HHE-QC-WP-016
Issue/Rev.
B/1
4. Definitions:

PT : Penetrant Examination.

5. Responsibilities:

The NDT Inspector shall be responsible for conducting and reporting the results of inspection in
accordance with project contract.

6. Personnel Qualifications:
6.1 All personnel involved in Penetrant Examinations shall be qualified in accordance with the
Requirements of Hesham Helal El Sewedy & Partners For Steel Industries Co. Ltd. (energya
steel), Written Practice No. HHE-QC-WP-015 (Written Practice for NDE Personnel
Qualification).

6.2 When the written practice is revised, the certification of NDE personnel remains valid to the
requirements of the previous revision until the expiry date of the personnel qualification
certificate; then, recertification to the requirements of the new revision is required.

6.3 The certification of personnel shall be checked by the QA/QC Manager prior to work
commencement.

7. Procedure:
This procedure shall be demonstrated prior to use in accordance with the requirements of T-150,
ASME Code Sec. V. The procedure qualification record shall be attached to this procedure.

7.1 Equipment:

7.1.1 Solvent Removable Visible Dye Penetrant materials consist of:

a) Penetrant.
b) Penetrant remover/cleaner.
c) Developer.
d) Lint free cloth.
e) Light meter capable of measuring visible light intensity in lux / foot candles (f.c.). The
light meter shall meet the calibration requirement of T-660 of ASME Code Section V.

Page 3 of 8
Hesham Helal El Sewedy & Partners For Steel Industries Co. Ltd.
(energya steel)

Liquid Penetration Examination (PT)


Document:
HHE-QC-WP-016
Issue/Rev.
B/1
7.2 Materials:

7.2.1 Only materials of a recognized commercial quality shall be used as identified by the
manufacturer’s name i.e. Ardrox, Ely Chemicals or Magnaflux or as specified by the
client.

7.2.2 Penetrant materials of the same family group shall be used, mix between family groups
is prohibited.

7.2.3 Certification of contaminant content shall be provided by manufacturers for all liquid
penetrant materials used on nickel base alloys, austenitic or duplex stainless steels, and
titanium. These certifications shall include the penetrant manufacturers' batch numbers
and the test results obtained in accordance with Mandatory Appendix II of Article 6,
ASME Code Sec. V. These records shall be maintained as required by the referencing
Code Section.

7.3 Surface Condition:

7.3.1 Generally satisfactory results may be obtained when the surface of the part is in the as-
welded, as-rolled, as-cast, or as forged condition. Surface preparation by grinding,
machining, or other methods may be necessary where surface irregularities could mask
indications of unacceptable discontinuities. Precautions shall be made with the
mechanical cleaning not to close the discontinuities open to the surface. Etching of the
cleaned surfaces may be necessary to open the discontinuities.

7.3.2 Prior to all liquid penetrant inspections, the surface to be examined and all adjacent
areas within at least 25mm (1”) shall be dry and free of dirt, grease, lint, scale, welding
flux, weld spatter, oil and other extraneous matters that could obscure surface openings
or otherwise interfere with the examination.

7.3.3 Typical cleaning agents that may be used are detergents, organic solvents, descaling
solutions and paint removers. Degreasing and ultrasonic cleaning methods may also be
used.

7.4 Method:

7.4.1 Surface Cleaning process:

a) Solvent cleaning method:


On removal of any rust, scale, welding flux, spatter, and in general, inorganic soils, the
surfaces to be inspected shall be cleaned, with solvent cleaner and then finally with a dry
lint free cloth.

Page 4 of 8
Hesham Helal El Sewedy & Partners For Steel Industries Co. Ltd.
(energya steel)

Liquid Penetration Examination (PT)


Document:
HHE-QC-WP-016
Issue/Rev.
B/1

7.4.2 Drying Process:

a) The drying process shall be accomplished by normal evaporation. Minimum time


allowed for drying is 1 minute to ensure that the cleaning solution has been evaporated
prior to application of the penetrant.

7.4.3 Application of penetrant:

a) After the area has been cleaned, dried and the temperature of the surface and penetrant
are within the range of 40° F (5° C) to 125° F (52° C), the penetrant shall be sprayed
directly to the surface to be inspected by means of aerosol container, so that the entire
area under inspection is completely covered.

b) After application, excess penetrant shall be allowed to drain (care being taken to prevent
pools of penetrant forming on the test area) while allowing for minimum penetration
(dwell) time stated in accordance with (ASME V.Article24, SE165) unless otherwise
specified by the client in a more restrictive manner.
c) The length of time the penetrant must remain on the part to allow proper penetration
should be as recommended by the penetrant manufacturer (dwell time shall not exceed
the maximum recommended by the manufacturer).

7.4.4 Excess Penetrant removal:

a) After the specified dwell time has been elapsed, any penetrant remaining on the surface
shall be removed with a dry or slightly moistened cloth of solvent cleaner, taking care to
minimize removal of penetrant from possible discontinuity.

b) Flushing the surface with solvent cleaner, following the application of the penetrant and
prior to developing is prohibited.

7.4.5 Drying after removal of excess penetrant:

a) The drying process shall be accomplished by normal evaporation. Drying time shall
only be that necessary to adequately dry the part.

7.4.6 Application of the developer:

a) Apply the non-aqueous wet developer directly to the area being inspected, by
spraying from the aerosol container.

Page 5 of 8
Hesham Helal El Sewedy & Partners For Steel Industries Co. Ltd.
(energya steel)

Liquid Penetration Examination (PT)


Document:
HHE-QC-WP-016
Issue/Rev.
B/1
b) The non-aqueous developer evaporates rapidly at room temperature and therefore does
not require the use of a dryer.

c) Areas being inspected shall be sprayed in such a manner so as to assure complete


coverage with a thin, even film of developer.

d) Dipping or flooding parts with non-aqueous developer is prohibited.

e) Developing dwell time shall not be less than 10 min., The maximum permitted
developing time is 1 h for nonaqueous developers as stated in accordance with
(ASME-V.Article24, SE-165) unless otherwise specified by the client, in a more
restrictive manner.

7.5 Examination:

7.5.1 Inspection shall be carried out after the applicable developer dwell time to allow for
bleed out of penetrant from discontinuities into the developer coating. It is good practice
to observe the bleed out while applying the developer as an aid in interpreting and
evaluating indications.

7.5.2 Visible penetrant indications can be inspected in natural or artificial white light. A
minimum intensity at the inspection surface of 100 foot candles (1000 Lux) is required.

7.5.3 The light source, technique used, and light level verification is required to be
demonstrated
One time, documented, and maintained on file.

7.6 Evaluation of indications:

7.6.1 All indications shall be evaluated in accordance with the referencing cod or
Specification.

7.6.2 Relevant indications are those that result from mechanical discontinuities:

a) Linear indications are those indications in which the length is more than three times the
width.

b) Rounded indication or indications which are circular or elliptical with lengths less than
three times the width.

Page 6 of 8
Hesham Helal El Sewedy & Partners For Steel Industries Co. Ltd.
(energya steel)

Liquid Penetration Examination (PT)


Document:
HHE-QC-WP-016
Issue/Rev.
B/1
c) Any questionable or doubtful indications shall be re-tested to verify whether or not
actual defects are present.

d) Localized surface imperfections may occur, such as machine marks, surface conditions,
or incomplete bond between base metal and cladding, may produce similar indications
which are not relevant to the detection of unacceptable discontinuities.

7.7 Acceptance Criteria:

7.7.1 Acceptance criteria for specific Codes are listed as below.


These acceptance standards shall apply unless other more restrictive standards are
specified if required by client.

ANSI / ASME B31.1 Indication > 1/16"(1.5mm) shall be considered as relevant


& 1. Linear Indication: Any crack or linear indication
ANSI / ASME B31.3 2. Rounded Indications
Indications with dimensions >3/16"(5.0mm)
Four or more rounded indication in a line separated by
1/16"(1.5mm) or less edge3 to edge.
Ten or more rounded indication in any 6 in2 of surface with the
major dimension of this area not to exceed 6 in.

ASME SEC VIII D1 Indications > 1/16" (1.5 mm) shall be considered as relevant
The following indications shall be rejectable:
1. Relevant linear indication >1/16" (1.5mm)
2. Relevant rounded indications > 3/16" (5 mm)
3. Four or more rounded indications in a line separated by 1/16" or
less (edge to edge).
AWS D1.1 Acceptance / Rejection criteria is dependent on service condition. Refer
to the relevant project engineer or the Inspection Department.
(Table 6.1 for visual inspection acceptance criteria can be applied)
ASME Sec IX Indications > 1/16"(1.5mm) shall be considered as relevant
The following indications shall be rejectable:
1. Relevant linear indication >1/16" (1.5 mm)

Page 7 of 8
Hesham Helal El Sewedy & Partners For Steel Industries Co. Ltd.
(energya steel)

Liquid Penetration Examination (PT)


Document:
HHE-QC-WP-016
Issue/Rev.
B/1
2. Relevant rounded indications > 3/16" (5 mm)
3. Four or more rounded indications in a line separated by 1/16"
(1.5mm) or less (edge to edge).
ASME Sec I Indications > 1/16"(1.5mm) shall be considered as relevant
The following indications shall be rejectable:
1. Relevant linear indication >1/16"(1.5mm)
2. Relevant rounded indications > 3/16"(5.0mm)
3. Four or more rounded indications in a line separated by
1/16"(1.5mm) or less (edge to edge).

7.8 Post cleaning:

7.8.1 Upon completion of the test, in cases where residual penetrant or developer could
interfere with subsequent processing or with service requirements, a suitable technique,
such as a water rinse or solvent soak for cleaning may be employed.

7.9 Documentation:

7.9.1 Non-rejectable indications shall be recorded as specified by the referencing Code


Section.

7.9.2 Rejectable indications shall be recorded. As a minimum, the type of indications (linear
or rounded), location and extent (length or diameter or aligned) shall be recorded.

8. Records:

Liquid Penetrant Examination shall be documented on Liquid Penetrant Examination Report


form no. HHE-QC-FO-078.

9. Attachments:

Dye Penetrant Examination Report ……………………………………….. HHE-QC-FO-078


Liquid Penetrant Demonstration Record …………………………………….. HHE-QC-FO-079

Page 8 of 8

You might also like