All About Commencement of Proceedings Under Code of Criminal Procedure1973 by Sakshi Rewaria
All About Commencement of Proceedings Under Code of Criminal Procedure1973 by Sakshi Rewaria
com
By Sakshi Rewaria
1
LatestLaws.com
2
LatestLaws.com
Introduction
When a report is been filed in a police station, the cognizance of the case is been
taken up by the competent magistrate and if it is triable then under section 209,
Cr.P.C., the case is been transferred before the “Court of Sessions.”
Ans. A public Prosecutor is any person appointed as such and includes any
person acting under the directions of a public servant.
The trial of every prosecution shall be conducted by the Public prosecutor
before the Sessions Court.
Q2. Who shall defend accused in the trial before the Sessions Court?
Ans. Every Accused person has a right to be defended by the counsel of his
choice and if the court is of the view that the accused has no sufficient means to
appoint a pleader, the court shall appoint a lawyer at the expense of the state to
defend the accused person.
3
LatestLaws.com
Q3. How is the opening of the case done before the Sessions Court done?
Ans. When the accused person is brought before the court related to
commitment of case under Section 209, the case is been opened by the
prosecutor describing the accusation/s against the person and briefly states the
evidences in his favour proving the guilt of the accused.
4
LatestLaws.com
At this stage of trial of Section 227 or 228, the standard test, proofs, judgment
are not sufficient to find whether accused is guilty or not. At such stage a very
strong suspicion founded upon materials on record which leads the court to
form a presumptive opinion as to existence of factual ingredients constituting
the offence alleged, may justify framing of charge against the accused in
respect of commission of offence, as per decided in various cases like State of
Bihar v. Ramesh singh, (1997) 4 SCC 39; Yogesh V. State of
Mahrashtra,(2008)10 SCC 394, Etc.
A person is said to be taken to have pleaded guilty when he pleads guilty to the
facts stating ingredients of the offence without adding anything external to it.
It has also been stated by Supreme Court in case of Pawan Kumar V. State of
Haryana, (1996) 4 SCC 17, that if an accused who has not been confronted
with substances of allegations against him, and pleads guilty is violation of a
provision of law, that plea is not a valid at all.
Q8. What are the steps been taken while observing the examination of
witness?
5
LatestLaws.com
b. The Judge may, in his discretion, permit the cross- examination of any
witness to be deferred until any other witness or witnesses have been
examined or recall any witness for further cross- examination.
The prosecution has a duty to examine all the witness essential for unfolding
prosecution witness. And if the court is of the view that the examination of
witness has not been done properly by the witness, the court is justified in
stating a decision adverse to the prosecution.
a. In all trials before a Court of Session, the evidence of each witness shall, as
his examination proceeds, be taken down in writing either by the presiding
Judge himself or by his dictation in open court or his direction and
Superintendence, by an officer of the court appointed by him in this behalf.
b. Such evidence shall ordinarily be taken down in the form of a narrative, but
the presiding judge may, in his discretion take down or cause to be taken
down, any part of’ such evidence in the form of question and answer.
Ans. If after examining the witnesses and the accused, the court is of the view
that there are no evidences that justifies that the accused has committed any
offence; the court shall record an order for acquittal of the accused person,
(Section 232).
6
LatestLaws.com
Q10. What is the procedure to be followed for conviction of the accused person?
The court may release him after admonition or on probation of good conduct
according to Section 360 or the provisions of the Probation of offender Act,
1958, and if the accused is not released then the court shall hear him further on
question of sentence.
Introduction
When a warrant case is been instituted on a police report, all the records found while
investigation done by the police is been made available before the said court and to
the accused person as well. Records are non-existent been instituted otherwise than on
a police report in a warrant case. The provisions dealing with the trial of warrant cases
by the Magistrate can be divided into three groups:-
7
LatestLaws.com
Q1. When are the charges been framed? And what are the things taken
into consideration while framing charges?
As per Section 240(1), When the Magistrate has considered the matter and is of
the opinion that the accused has committed an offence which should be tried,
and in his opinion could be adequately be punished , a charge shall be framed
against the accused in writing.
The court shall judicially consider the questions, and shall not frame the
charges merely on the basis that prosecution authorities find it proper to
institute the case.
The Magistrate after considering the record of the case shall hear the
arguments, of both the parties in support of their case. As per judgement been
made in State of Mizoram v. K. Lalruata, (1992), Cri 970 (Gau), When order is
to be discharged, the steps are to be taken into consideration as:
a. Considering the police report and the document referred to in Section 173
and which are furnished to the accused;
b. Examination , of the accused as per the necessity of the case stated by the
Magistrate;
c. Giving prosecution and accused an opportunity of being heard and then to
consider whether the charge is groundless.
8
LatestLaws.com
a. If the accused refuses to plead or does not plead, or claims to be tried or the
Magistrate does not convict the accused under section 241, the Magistrate
shall fix a date for the examination of witnesses.
Q5. How are charges been formed when the case is been instituted
otherwise than on a police report?
9
LatestLaws.com
If, when such evidence has been taken, or at any previous stage of the case, the
Magistrate is of opinion that there is ground for presuming that the accused has
committed an offence triable under this Chapter, which such Magistrate is
competent to try and which, in his opinion, could be adequately punished by
him, he shall frame in writing a charge against the accused.
All the witness when produced before the Magistrate, are examined before
framing of charges, and the accused may also be recalled for further cross-
examination.
• When Magistrate has no Jurisdiction- If, in the course of any inquiry into an
offence or a trial before a Magistrate in any district, the evidence appears to
him to Warrant a presumption-
a. that he has no jurisdiction to try the case or commit it for trial, or
b. that the case is one which should be tried or committed for trial by some other
Magistrate in the district, or
c. that the case should be tried by the Chief Judicial Magistrate,
10
LatestLaws.com
,He shall stay the proceedings and submit the case, with a brief report
explaining its nature, to the Chief Judicial Magistrate or to such other
Magistrate, having jurisdiction, as the Chief Judicial Magistrate directs.
As per Section 248 (2); When the Magistrate takes into consideration all the
material facts, evidences, hears both the parties, then only the Judgement is
been passed.
If the Magistrate is of the view that the accused person is not guilty of the said
offence, he shall pass order of acquittal of the person;
And if the Magistrate is of the view that the accused person is guilty of the
offence, he shall hear the accused on the question of sentence and then pass the
order.
11
LatestLaws.com
If the accused is been previously convicted under Section 211(7), and it is not
been admitted by the accused, evidences with respect to previous conviction is
been recorded. And no such charge shall be passed by the Magistrate until and
unless the accused has been convicted under Section 248(2).
If the Magistrate is of the view that there are no reasonable grounds making
any accusation against the accused, he shall be called upon for such accusation
to show why he should not pay compensation to the accused person (Section
250(1)).
After the Magistrate hears the accused, he may record the reasons; make an
order fixing the compensation to be paid by such person to the accused person.
12
LatestLaws.com
c. If the accused is not been convicted by the Magistrate on his plea of guilty,
the proceeding may move ahead to hear the prosecution by the Magistrate.
f. The Magistrate then “hear” the accused and takes into consideration the
evidences in his defence and allows to submit his arguments after
conclusion of his evidences.
13
LatestLaws.com
Q7. Does the court has any power to convert a summon case into a
warrant case?
Ans. If in the trial of the summon case the accused is been punished with
imprisonment with more than six months and it is in the interest of justice, the
offence may be tried as a warrant case.
The said case may be reheard in the manner of a warrant case and the witness
may also be recalled.
14
LatestLaws.com
15