0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views

Arif Lecture 17

Uploaded by

fygaming.fy
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views

Arif Lecture 17

Uploaded by

fygaming.fy
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

AA 284a

Advanced Rocket Propulsion

Lecture 17
Electric Propulsion
Prepared by
Arif Karabeyoglu

Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics


Stanford University
and
Mechanical Engineering
KOC University

Fall 2019
Stanford University
AA 284a Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Electric Propulsion Fundamentals
• Chemical systems are capable of delivering very high thrust forces, but the
energy storage capability in the chemical bonds limits the maximum exhaust
velocity, thus the Isp.
• Concept has been discovered by pioneers: Tsiolkovski, Goddard, Oberth.
• First demonstrated by Vladimir Glusko, USSR
• Electric propulsion systems require large power source which limits their use.
• Commonly used in applications requiring very high Isp’s, but low thrust
densities.
– Satellite propulsion
– Interplanetary missions
• Very low thrust, heavy power supply leads to very low acceleration (10-4-10-6
g’s): influences flight strategy- spiral trajectory
• Three general kinds:
– Electrothermal: Use electric energy to thermalize the propellant (Isp limited by order
of speed of sound)
– Electrostatic: Use electric fields to accelerate ionized propellant (speed of light)
– Electromagnetic: Use electromagnetic fields to accelerate plasma propellant (speed
of light)
Stanford University
2 Karabeyoglu
AA 284a Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Electric Propulsion – Common Types

Common Isp, Power Range, W Thrust Range, Typical


Propellants sec mN Efficiency, %
Electrothermal
Resistojet N2H2, NH3 ~300 500-1500 100-500 80
Arcjet N2H2, H2 500-2,000 300-100,000 200-2,000 35
Electrostatic
Ion Xe 3,000 50-2500 10-200 70
Hall Effect Xe 1,500-2000 1500-5000 80-200 50
Electromagnetic
Pulsed Plasma Teflon 1,000 1-200 1-100 5
MPD NH3, H2 2,000-5,000 1,000-4 106 1,000-2 106 25

Stanford University
3 Karabeyoglu
AA 284a Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Electric Propulsion – Important Equations
• Electric Propulsion System Efficiency:
η : Efficiency
– Conversion of electric energy to kinetic energy
Pe = Elecric Power
E! k m! ve2 T ve T Isp g o T2 T : Thrust
η= = = = = m! : Pr opellant Flow Rate
Pe 2 Pe 2 Pe 2 Pe 2 m! Pe
ve : Exit Velocity
• Note that the effect of the exit pressure on the thrust force has been neglected.
This is accurate for most systems, but not all types including MPD, resistojets
• Basic Analysis: Required burn time - mission duration
T 2 Pe η
ΔV = tb T=
M ve M : Averege Mass − Spacecraft
– Combine
ve ΔV tb : Mission Time
tb =
2η (Pe M ) Δv : DeltaV of Mission
– Specific power, Pe/M, is critical to limit mission time
– This analysis is only valid if the propellant mass is a small fraction of the initial mass

Stanford University
4 Karabeyoglu
AA 284a Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Electric Propulsion – Important Equations
• Power Supply – Specific Power:

P α : Specific Power
α= e M pwr = Mass Power Plant
M pwr
• Mpwr includes the mass of the power system, propellant feed system and the
engine itself
2
Pe m! ve2 M prop ve
M pwr = = =
α 2η α 2η tb α M : Payload Massp
• With the use of rocket eqn.
M prop : Pr opellant Mass
ΔV / ve
Mi e
= M i : M p + M prop + M pwr
( )(
M p 1 + 1 − eΔV / ve ve2 2η tb α )
• Note that for a given initial mass to payload ratio there is an optimum ΔV / v e
• There is an optimum Isp for a given system/mission for electric propulsion
systems
–This is because increasing Isp increases power plant mass, but reduces propellant mass
–A balance which does not exist in a chemical rocket

Stanford University
5 Karabeyoglu
AA 284a Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Electrothermal Systems
• Resistojet:
– Resistively heat the propellant using a heat
exchanger
– Simple, but low performance system
– Performance limited by the melting temperature of
of the heat exchanger.
– Isp better than monoprops and cold gas thrusters
– Mature technology

• Arcjet:
– Arc discharge heats the propellant
– Arc is generated by
• Low DC voltage high current
• High frequency high voltage
– Local heating and thermal losses limit efficiency
– Electron life limits life to about 1,500 hours
– Mature technology

Stanford University
6 Karabeyoglu
AA 284a Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Electrostatic Systems ! ! ! !
• Ion Engine:
F = e E + e ve × B Coulomb force
– Propellant is ionized
• Electron bombardment
• Radiofrequency excitation
– Accelerated using high electrostatic potential
(~1,000V)
– Low density ion field (not a plasma)
– Plume is neutralized to prevent charge built up
– High power requirement limits usage
– Mature technology
• Hall Effect Thruster
– Gridless electrostatic propulsion system
– External hallow cathode ring shaped anode: ~300 V
– Magnetic field spirals electrons ionizing the gas
– Ions are accelerated by the electric potential
– First developed and extensively used by Russians
– Currently being used extensively in the Western world
– Optimum Isp in1,500 s, low voltage and moderate power consumption makes this a very
attractive option.
– New Application: Orbit raising for GeoSats
Stanford University
7 Karabeyoglu
AA 284a Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Electrostatic Systems – General Scaling
1/ 2 1/ 2
⎛ 2 qV ⎞ 1 ⎛ 2 qV ⎞
• Ion velocity and Isp: ve = ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ Isp = ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ mion : Ion Mass
⎝ mion ⎠ g o ⎝ mion ⎠
m q : Ion Ch arg e
• Current mass flow rate relationship: m! = J ion
q J : Current
1/ 2
⎛ 2 mion V ⎞
• Thrust relationship T = m! ve = J ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟
⎝ q ⎠

• Propellant selection T ∝ mion q Isp ∝ q mion

• In order to maximize thrust, one must use large MW and low ionic charge
1/ 2
ΔV ⎛V q ⎞
• The mission duration can be estimated to be tb = ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟
• Note that Pe=V J+ power for ionization
(Pe M )η ⎝ 2 mion ⎠
• Reducing mission duration requires:
– Low values for voltage and ion charge to mass ratio
– High efficiency and specific power

Stanford University
8 Karabeyoglu
AA 284a Advanced Rocket Propulsion
! ! !
Electromagnetic Systems F = e E + e v! × B Lorentz force
e
• Pulse Plasma Thruster:
– Very simple system
– Solid propellant is formed into a plasma by
electric discharge
– Plasma is accelerated using electromagnetic
field
– Very low efficiency
– Pulsed mode operation

• Magnetoplasmadynamic (MPD):
– Large current discharge applied between the two
electrodes ionizes the gas
– Self Induced MPD: Magnetic field is self induced
by the current
– Applied field MPD: Magnetic field externally applied
– The plasma is accelerated by the Lorentz force
– Large thrust force possible – requires very large
power levels, high Isp feasible
– Cathode erosion is an issue
Stanford University
9 Karabeyoglu
AA 284a Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Electric Propulsion Systems – Overall Performance

Ref: “Sutton, “Rocket Propulsion Elements”

Stanford University
10 Karabeyoglu

You might also like