An Action Research Study On Improving Seventh Stan
An Action Research Study On Improving Seventh Stan
net/publication/317330760
CITATIONS READS
3 12,099
3 authors, including:
Bijay Swain
College of Teacher Education Balasore Odisha
43 PUBLICATIONS 417 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Bijay Swain on 18 January 2020.
Abstract: One of the most vital elements of education and literacy is Language. Learning a language is similar
to swimming and riding a bicycle. Thus the present action research is aimed to improve the writing skill of the
7th standard students creatively in an Elementary school. A total sample of 15 students’ from the same grade was
chosen for the study. The baseline assessment was carried out to explore the pre-intervention writing skill score
of the students prior to the intervention cycle. Later, intervention and writing skill support strategies were
carried out for six weeks. In the end, post-test was carried out to explore the differences between the pre- and
post-test score of the students. The finding of the present work is suggested that writing skill of the students has
been increased up to a satisfactory level. The creativeness of the writing skill was also increased.
I. INTRODUCTION
One of the most vital elements of education and literacy is Language. Learning a language is similar to
swimming and riding a bicycle. We learn them by practice and use. There are four basic skills of language
learning. These are listening, speaking, reading and writing. Among these four languages skill, listening and
reading are receive skill and speaking and writing are productive skills. Writing is the final skill in the hierarchy
of language skills. Its efficiency and commands come with the mastery in receive and productive skills. From
our early generation to till now the productive skills of language are in main focus of which writing is the most
preferred outcome expected of students, in all over world. This is possible only in schools where the students are
required to master in good writing compositions (Nasir et al., 2013).
Creative writing can technically be considered any writing of original composition. In this sense,
creative writing is a more contemporary and process-oriented name for what has been traditionally
called literature, including the variety of its genres. Creative writers typically decide an emphasis in either
fiction or poetry, and they usually start with short stories or simple poems. They then make a schedule based on
this emphasis including literature classes, education classes and workshop classes to strengthen their skills and
techniques. Creative writing helps to involve in extracurricular writing-based activities, such as publishing
clubs, school-based literary magazines or newspapers, writing contests, writing colonies or conventions, and
extended education classes.
Creative writing is usually taught in a workshop format rather than seminar style or in normal
classroom transaction. In workshops students usually submit original work for peer critique. Students develop a
writing method through the process of writing and re-writing. Generally the students of higher classes’ became
efficient in generating and organizing creative ideas. Writing process is one of the most adopted teaching model
which helps in developing writing skills in the balanced literacy approach (Zampardo, 2008).
Being an ability, writing can be improved by learning through repetition. When teacher will well aware
of the writing process, this will help in appropriate teaching strategies and that will also improve the writing
abilities of students in education environment (Oberman and Kapka, 2001). In writing process, there are five
stages i.e, Prewriting, Drafting, Revising, Editing and Publishing. If the writing process of any stage will skip,
then students will not improve their creative thinking power. Learning the writing process is important for the
students as it enables students to express their thoughts, knowledge and feelings efficiently. When students feel
more competent in their writing process, then they will express themselves efficiently (Creswell, 2008; Smith,
2000). According to Brookes and Marshall (2004), imagination and originality are valued more than the
standardization of thought and truthfulness while characterizing creative writing. While assessing the student for
creative writing, they are given space to construct the content. The main purpose is to evaluate their creative
writing and cognitive skills. In order to write creatively, it is essential that the thoughts of the students’ should
not be restricted in a confined area. For creative writing, important pre-requisites are planning, organization and
discovery of thought. If appropriate scope will not be provided to the students then they will not be able to
maintain the originality of their creative work (Richards, 1990). In order to motivate the students to engage in
DOI: 10.9790/0837-2206011720 www.iosrjournals.org 17 | Page
An Action Research Study on Improving Seventh Standard Students’ Creative Writing Skill in English
creative writing exercises the facilitator should provide sufficient opportunities to the students to involve
themselves in high order thinking and a regular habit of reading (Nasir et al., 2013). During practice teaching
the researcher came to know that school students are lack of writing skills and the teachers don’t seem to using a
proper writing process too. Therefore, this study aimed at describing the difficulties pertaining to composition
writing and strategies to develop writing abilities of the students to write creatively. Therefore, an attempt is
made here in the form of an action research study on creative writing, to develop the vocabulary and use of
correct Grammar skills and to develop the skill of creative writing of seventh standard students of Ramachandra
Nodal UP School, Remuna, Balasore, Odisha.
II. METHODOLOGY
The researchers determined action research (experimental designing) for this study. During the
research; a pre-test was done, interventions were made consistently and finally post- test was done. For this
study, all students of Ramachandra Nodal Upper Primary School studying in Class-VII were taken as sample.
Sampling method
A sample of 15 students out of the population of all the students (22) of Class-VII was drawn and the
sampling method was simple random sampling. The sample of 15 students was drawn from the population
randomly by lottery method. First of all the names of the 22 students were wrote on separate slips of paper, fold
those slips, mixed them thoroughly and then made a blind fold selection of 15 slips. The age group of these
students varied from 11-14years. The students were talking English (neither fluently nor properly) with each
other and others. Again, they were not able to write English in a proper manner, though they studied in seventh
standard. In Odisha, the English of seventh standard is not high standard; still they were not able to write such
English. Both pre-and post test was conducted during the study period in classroom, as the performance of the
students was measurable.
Measures
Learning achievement test for English language composition was designed to collect the data about
students’ baseline status of composition proficiency and another similar genre paper was designed to explore the
impact of intervention on the students, which was given at the end of the cycle completion as a post-test.
Pre-test: Composition test consisted of “Your Class Teacher” for pre-test. Then the students creativity was
evaluate on the basis of different criteria such as spelling, punctuation, vocabulary, organization, Grammar,
content quality and creativity. The pre -test identified the current level of writing skills of the students.
Intervention
The researchers planned to work on the incompetent writing skills of the students, which they noticed
during their practice teaching. Later the research was conducted after discussing with the detail plan with the
subject teacher and taking permission of the Headmistress of the concerned school. Again, a few strategies were
laid down as intervention which consisted of various creative writing exercises. The students were asked to
explain some pictures after providing list of vocabulary, having some dictionary in the class, updating the class
word bank, and recommending students to use dictionary and word list frequently (Nasir et al., 2013). Then,
Grammar was taught by activity based approach. A special interest was shown by the researcher in creative
writing and the students were highly motivated by it and tried to give their extra efforts as well. The rules for
sentence structure such as the subject, object and verb agreement were also verbally taught to the whole class.
Intervention was carried out consequently for six weeks. After 15days, a post-test was taken to see what changes
had taken place in the writing skills of the students.
Post-test
After intervention a post-test was done. In this test, five words, such as fair, line, interesting,
shopkeepers and magic was given to the students and asked them to write an essay in ten sentences. During such
work the researcher also asked them to write the title of the essay. Interestingly, 9 children’s were written the
name of the essay correctly, while four were haphazardly and rests two were written the same after discussing
with their friends.
increased by 23 %. Such result was obtained because the teacher had focused on a regular intervention and
children when given vocabulary are seemed to have shown prominent progress (Nasir et al., 2013). When the
scores of these two tests were compared (Table-3), the difference was clearly visible. In content quality the post-
test increased by 28 % and in Vocabulary it was 21%. The greatest improvement was shown in the areas of
creativity (41%) and content quality (28%). This was due to the reason that a lot of reinforcements of new words
were done. Writing practice was made very carefully. Children were made aware of the correct use of the words
that were introduced by the researchers on regular basis. As a special interest was shown by the researcher in
creating writing, the students were much motivated by it and tried to put in their extra efforts as well. The rules
for sentence structure such as the subject, object and verb agreement were also taught by both verbally and
activity based activity based approach to the class which contributed to the better results in the area of general
English grammar and the text structure of the students. The development of creative writing among seven
standard students is possible only by increasing their reading ability and thinking power. The researcher was
given a lot of scope to the students’ to think the subject matter in their own way. As the students were belonging
to 12-13 age groups, the researcher also facilitates them at the time of their need.
Table 1: Result of class- VII students in writing essay before taking interventions
Criteria Pre-test
Spelling 35
Punctuation 33
Vocabulary 42
Organization 45
Grammar 26
Content quality 46
Creativity 32
Table 2: Result of class- VII students in writing essay after taking interventions
Criteria Post-test
Spelling 43
Punctuation 40
Vocabulary 47
Organization 50
Grammar 32
Content quality 59
Creativity 45
In order to know the difference between the pre-test and post-test, t-test was applied and the value of mean
score, standard deviation, t-value was presented in the Table-4.
Table 4: Mean, Standard Deviation, Standard Error of Mean, t-value, degrees of freedom (df), and level of
significance of the scores obtained from tests with respect to variable-performance
Performance N Mean SD SEM df ‘t’ Level of Significance and its value
Pre-test result 15 3.8 3.74 0.97 14 3.92 2.3 at 0.05 level
Post-test result 15 3.8
The tabulated value of ‘t’ at 0.01 and 0.05 level of significant was 2.14 and 2.3, respectively. Since the
calculated t-value was more than the tabulated value at 14 degree of freedom, the difference between the
average of pre-test score and post- test scores was significant. Hence it is clear that through different activity
creative writing of students was developed.
IV. CONCLUSION
From the above discussion, it has been concluded that the intervention has been proved to be fruitful in
most of the students, while some reflection is required for those who did not progress. The intervention proved
to bring out significant improvement in enhancing the composition writing skills of the students. The findings of
this research can be beneficial for the teachers of both elementary and secondary schools, pupil teachers and
students. This may very helpful for the teachers to adopt suitable pedagogical process for improvement of
writing skill of their students. It would be enjoyable and beneficial for those teachers who have direct contact
with the students and they would be excited to witness a change. Basing upon the above discussion, the
following might be suggested: every stage of the writing process should be studied and demonstrated by both,
teachers and the students in order to develop the writing abilities (Nasir et al., 2013; Mak and Conium, 2008;
Walker et al., 2005).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The researchers are thankful to the Principal, DIET, Balasore for helping us in conducting the study.
REFERENCES
[1]. L. Nasir, S. M. Naqvi, and S. Bhamani. (2013). Enhancing students’ creative writing skills: An Action
Research project. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 6 (2), 2013, 27-31.
[2]. B. Mak, and D. Coniam. Using wikis to enhance and develop writing skills among secondary school
students in Hong Kong. System, 36(3), 2008, 437-455.
[3]. B. Walker, M.E. Shippen, P. Alberto, D.E. Houchins, and D.F. Cihak. Using the Expressive Writing
program to improve the writing skills of high school students with learning disabilities. Learning
Disabilities Research & Practice, 20(3), 2005, 175-183.
[4]. I. Brookes, and M. Marshall. Good writing guide. New York: Harap Publishers Ltd, 2004.
[5]. J. Richards. New Trends in the Teaching of Writing in ESL/ EFL in Wang Z. (ed.) ELT in China. Papers
Presented at the International Symposium on Teaching English in the Chinese Context, Foreign Language
Teaching and Research Press, Beijing, 1990.
[6]. A. Özbek. The effect of a creative thinking programme on EFL students’attitudes towards their own
creativity in writing. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü,
Ankara, 2006.
[7]. D. Kapka, and D.A. Oberman. İmproving student writing skills through the modeling of the writing
process. Research Project, Saint Xavier University and Sky Light Professional Development Field-Based
Masters Program. ERİC ED, 2001, 453 536.
[8]. K.M. Zampardo. An examination of the impact of teacher modeling on young children’s writing.
Unpublished doctoral thesis. Oakland University, Michigan, 2008. (UMİ No: 3340069)
[9]. C.B. Smith. Writing instruction: Current Practices in the classroom, 2000 (ERIC Document Reproduction
Service No: ED446338).
[10]. J.W. Creswell. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage
Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2008.