0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views

CULA

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views

CULA

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 13

400

25% Vinegar; 25% Vinegar; 50% Vinegar; 300 180


rust stain 50% Baking 25% Baking 25% Baking 200
removal Soda; 25% Soda; 50% Soda; 25% 100
duration Lemon Juice Lemon Juice Lemon Juice 0
trial 1 180 300 360

Axis Title
trial 2 180 300 360
trial 3 180 215 360
average 180 271.67 360

Axis

trial 1 trial 2 tri

Mean of Computed
Specifics N SD p-value
Ranks H

25% Vinegar;
50% Baking 3 180 0
Soda; 25%
Lemon Juice

25% Vinegar;
25% Baking 3 271.67 49.07 7.78s 0.0204
Soda; 50%
Lemon Juice

50% Vinegar;
25% Baking 3 360 0
Soda; 25%
Lemon Juice
s
= significant at alpha level of 0.05

25% Vinegar; 25% Vinegar; 50% Vinegar;


MOLD stain 50% Baking 25% Baking 25% Baking
removal Soda; 25% Soda; 50% Soda; 25%
duration Lemon Juice Lemon Juice Lemon Juice
trial 1 59 109 92
trial 2 51 60 90
trial 3 50 58 60
average 53.33 75.67 80.67
Mean of Computed
Specifics N SD p-value
Ranks H

25% Vinegar;
50% Baking 3 53.33 4.93
Soda; 25%
Lemon Juice

25% Vinegar;
25% Baking 3 75.67 28.88 4.5 ns
0.1052
Soda; 50%
Lemon Juice

50% Vinegar;
25% Baking 3 80.67 17.93
Soda; 25%
Lemon Juice
ns
= significant at alpha level of 0.05

25% Vinegar; 25% Vinegar; 50% Vinegar;


yellow stain 50% Baking 25% Baking 25% Baking
removal Soda; 25% Soda; 50% Soda; 25%
duration Lemon Juice Lemon Juice Lemon Juice

Axis Title
trial 1 47 180 206
trial 2 52 180 200
trial 3 180 156 180
average 93 172 195.33

;
ar
eg
V in
%
25
Mean of Computed
Specifics N SD p-value
Ranks H

25% Vinegar;
50% Baking 3 93 75.39
Soda; 25%
Lemon Juice

25% Vinegar;
25% Baking 3 172 13.86 4.82 ns
0.0897
Soda; 50%
Lemon Juice
4.82 ns
0.0897

50% Vinegar;
25% Baking 3 195.33 13.61
Soda; 25%
Lemon Juice
ns
= significant at alpha level of 0.05

8
25% Vinegar; 25% Vinegar; 50% Vinegar; 7.8
50% Baking 25% Baking 25% Baking
Soda; 25% Soda; 50% Soda; 25% 7.6
7.33
ph value Lemon Juice Lemon Juice Lemon Juice 7.4

Axis Title
trial 1 8 8 7 7.2
trial 2 7 7 7 7
trial 3 7 7 7 6.8
average 7.33 7.33 7 6.6
6.4
25% Vinegar; 50% Bakin
Soda; 25% Lemon Juice

Anova: Single Factor

trial
SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Variance SD
25% Vinegar; 50% 3 22 7.33333333333 0.33333333333 0.58
25% Vinegar; 25% 3 22 7.33333333333 0.33333333333 0.58
50% Vinegar; 25% 3 21 7 0 0

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 0.22222222222 2 0.11111111111 0.5 0.62973760933 5.143253
Within Groups 1.33333333333 6 0.22222222222

Total 1.55555555556 8

since the p-value is greater than the alpha 0.05


failed to reject the null hypothesis
there is no significant difference
360
400 271.67
300 180
200
100
0
kruskal-wallis

Axis Title

trial 1 trial 2 trial 3 average

since the p-value is lesser than the alpha 0.05

reject the null hypothesis

there is a significant difference

120 75.67 80.67


80 53.33

40
0
ice ice ice
Axis Title

Ju Ju Ju
on on on
m m m
Le Le Le
5% 0% 5%
;2 ;5 ;2
da da da
So So So
g g g
kin kin kin
Ba Ba Ba
% % %
50 25 25
r; r; r;
0
ice ice ice

Axis Title
Ju Ju Ju
on on on
m m m
Le Le Le
% % %
; 25 ; 50 ; 25
oda oda oda
S S S
g g g
kin kin kin
Ba Ba Ba
0% 5% 5%
r;5 r;2 r;2
g a g a a
ne ne n eg
Vi Vi AxisViTitle
% % %
25 25 50
trial 1 trial 2 trial 3 average

since the p-value is greater than the alpha 0.05

failed to reject the null hypothesis

there is no significant difference

172 195.33
200
93
100
0
ice ice ice
Axis Title

Ju Ju Ju
on on on
m m m
Le Le Le
% % %
25 50 25
a; a; a;
S od S od S od
g g g
in in in
B ak B ak B ak
0% 5% 5%
;5 ;2 ;2
g ar g ar ar
ne ne n eg
Vi Vi AxisViTitle
% % %
25 25 50
trial 1 trial 2 trial 3 average
since the p-value is greater than the alpha 0.05

failed to reject the null hypothesis


there is no significant difference

8
7.8
7.6
7.33 7.33
7.4
7.2 7
7
6.8
6.6
6.4
25% Vinegar; 50% Baking 25% Vinegar; 25% Baking 50% Vinegar; 25% Baking
Soda; 25% Lemon Juice Soda; 50% Lemon Juice Soda; 25% Lemon Juice
Axis Title

trial 1 trial 2 trial 3 average


rust stain removal Proposed Alternative Commercial
duration Bathroom Cleaner Bathroom Cleaner
trial 1 90 180
trial 2 60 180
trial 3 180 180
average 110 180

Specifics N SD Sum of Mean Ranks

Proposed
Alternative
3 62.45
Bathroom
Cleaner 13.95
Commercial
Bathroom 3 0
Cleaner

ns
= not significant at alpha level of 0.05

since the p-value is greater than the alpha 0.05


failed to reject the null hypothesis
there is no significant difference

60 53.33

50
40
Axis Title

30
20
MOLD stain removal Proposed Alternative Commercial
duration Bathroom Cleaner Bathroom Cleaner 10
trial 1 59 60 0
Proposed Alternative Bathroom
Cleaner
Axis

trial 1 trial 2 tri


30

Axis
20
10
0
trial 2 51 30 Proposed Alternative Bathroom
Cleaner
trial 3 50 30
Axis
average 53.33 40
4.93 17.32
trial 1 trial 2 tri

Specifics N SD Sum of Mean Ranks

Proposed
Alternative
3 4.93
Bathroom
Cleaner 12
Commercial
Bathroom 3 17.32
Cleaner

ns
= not significant at alpha level of 0.05

since the p-value is greater than the alpha 0.05


failed to reject the null hypothesis 180

TIME DURATION IN SECONDS


there is no significant difference 160
140
120
100
yellow stain removal Proposed Alternative Commercial 80
duration Bathroom Cleaner Bathroom Cleaner 60
trial 1 120 47 40
trial 2 60 52 20
0
trial 3 180 180 Proposed Alternati
average 120 93 Cleane

60.00 75.39

trial

Specifics N SD Sum of Mean Ranks

Proposed
Alternative
3 60
Bathroom
Cleaner 12.12
12.12
Commercial
Bathroom 3 75.39
Cleaner

ns
= not significant at alpha level of 0.05

since the p-value is greater than the alpha 0.05


failed to reject the null hypothesis 14
there is no significant difference 12
10

Axis Title
8
Proposed Alternative Commercial 6
ph value Bathroom Cleaner Bathroom Cleaner
4
trial 1 8 13
2
trial 2 7 13
0
trial 3 7 12 Proposed Alternative Bathr
average 7.33 13
0.58 0.58
tria

Specifics N SD Sum of Mean Ranks

Proposed
Alternative
3 0.58
Bathroom
Cleaner 12.2
Commercial
Bathroom 3 0.58
Cleaner

ns
= not significant at alpha level of 0.05

since the p-value is greater than the alpha 0.05


failed to reject the null hypothesis
there is no significant difference
180
180
160
140
110
120

Axis Title
100
80
60
40
20
0
Proposed Alternative Bathroom Commercial Bathroom Cleaner
Cleaner
Axis Title
Z
U p-value
Score
trial 1 trial 2 trial 3 average

13.5 0.1826ns
0.4286

53.33

40

Proposed Alternative Bathroom Commercial Bathroom Cleaner


Cleaner
Axis Title

trial 1 trial 2 trial 3 average


Proposed Alternative Bathroom Commercial Bathroom Cleaner
Cleaner
Axis Title

trial 1 trial 2 trial 3 average

Z
U p-value
Score

15 0.0913ns
0.4641

180
TIME DURATION IN SECONDS

160
140 120
120 93
100
80
60
40
20
0
Proposed Alternative Bathroom Commercial Bathroom Cleaner
Cleaner
CONCENTRATION

trial 1 trial 2 trial 3 average

Z
U p-value
Score

11.5 -0.5477ns
0.2912
11.5 -0.5477ns
0.2912

13
14
12
10 7.33
Axis Title

8
6
4
2
0
Proposed Alternative Bathroom Cleaner Commercial Bathroom Cleaner
Axis Title

trial 1 trial 2 trial 3 average

Z
U p-value
Score

9 -1.0042ns
0.1587
180

mercial Bathroom Cleaner

average

You might also like