Recognition in Work
Recognition in Work
(Peer Reviewed International Journal), Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages 38-50, July-September 2018
Article Received: 29 April 2018 Article Accepted: 24 July 2018 Article Published: 25 August 2018
ABSTRACT
Employee motivation and satisfaction is one of the fundamentally researched subjects. Due to the booming of the Hospitality and tourism sector on
a global level in the recent times there is a lot of opportunity and growth for those candidates who opt to have a career in this industry. The
Hospitality and Tourism sector is one of the highest people oriented service sector which is rising at a fast pace in the recent years. Ensuring that the
employees in the hotel are satisfied and motivated must be one of the top priorities of the management so that it can acquire and retain its best talents
and also to deliver the best services with the highest quality. This study is undertaken to learn the impact of rewards and recognition programs on
employee motivation and satisfaction in five star hotels in Chennai. From the study it is evident that there is no significant link between the provision
of monetary rewards and non-monetary rewards to Employee motivation and satisfaction respectively in the five star hotels in Chennai, but there is
a significant link between the performance appraisal process and Employee motivation.
Keywords: Hospitality sector, Employee motivation, Employee Satisfaction, Rewards and Recognition Programs.
INTRODUCTION
Motivation is the energy that fuels people to choose a particular job and to try hard to succeed in that job. The
ultimate result of success driven by motivation is satisfaction. Which again leads to motivation? It resembles a
chain of events. Employee motivation refers to a factor, or factors, that cause an employee to pursue work tasks or
goals. It's what causes you to act in a certain way which is beneficial to achieving both individual and
Organisational objectives. Many studies state that motivation is focused on different human needs. These studies
state that the pressure of an unsatisfied need provides motivation, but Humans cannot simply be termed as creatures
who function after recognizing their need. They understand work situations based on the framework of their lives,
their perceived possibilities of Success, their cultural values, and the level of satisfaction that they have already
achieved. Each human being differs in character and in the way of functioning. It is the job of the Human resource
manager to know what kind of monetary or non-monetary reward an employee might prefer in order to be
motivated. Employee satisfaction is also an important element that contributes towards achieving the ultimate goals
of the organisations. Employee satisfaction is a portion of how contented workers are with their job and working
environment. So it is the management’s responsibility to ensure that the employees attain complete Job satisfaction
so that the firm would be able to achieve its shared objectives.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Employee motivation
Employee motivation is one of the vivacious parts in achieving the success of business. Employee motivation is a
compilation of active forces (C. C. Pinder, 1998); Each manager must understand the needs of the employees and
must generate an apt work environment to motivate employees (R. Luomanpaa, 2012); Crucial factors that
contribute to employee motivation are the needs of employees, their working environment, given responsibilities,
supervision, fairness shown employee´s development in the firm, feedback and rewarding. (S. Ramlall, 2004);
Employee motivation can be defined as the psychological process that gives behaviour purpose and direction
(Kreitner, 1995); an internal drive to satisfy an unsatisfied need (Higgins, 1994); and the will to achieve (Bedeian,
1993).
Employee satisfaction
Employee satisfaction has become an increasingly important category. A satisfied employee works more and
better. (Sakanovič and Mayer, 2006); A satisfied person is more successful and performs his/her work more
efficiently, achieves the goals of the organization and contributes to its effectiveness (Gorenak and Pagon, 2006).
The reason for wanting a job is often considerably more than just a pay check. Jobs can be looked at as the means
used to achieve personal goals. When a job meets an individual’s expectancy, the individual experiences positive
emotions.
Non-monetary rewards includes recognition programs, simple praise among other such non-monetary incentives.
(Pillay, 2009); Recognition is another non-monetary reward, yet many employees are not given even a pat in the
back or a handshake by their bosses. Recognition can come in different forms. An informal appreciation ceremony
for all those who have excelled expectations for a given month is the most common form. Other forms of
Non-monetary rewards are Provision of Training, A Chance to Contribute and Fringe Benefits.
The hotel industry has long struggled with this question because of high employee turnover. It is believed that the
nature of the work, its low pay, and its long working hours contribute to the high turnover. (Chun-Fang Chiang,
2010) Without motivation, an employee will not advance in his/her career (Wong et al., 1999). Motivation factors
comprising pay, financial rewards, chance for progression and upgrade which have been followed for ages in the
hotel industry (Byrne, 1986; Wong et al., 1999). Also, other motivation factors such as job responsibility, Getting
recognised by people, challenging work, and feelings of achievement and improvement of self-esteem have been
identified important for hotel employees (Wong et al., 1999).
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Sampling Design
For the study, the researchers chose hospitality industry which does not have a standard workman position and the
respondents are not possibly available most of the time and also due to the time constrain for collecting the
information inside the organization the researchers used Non – probability convenient sampling method to collect
the data from the respondents.
Sample Size
The participants in this study were 80 employees working in different departments. The purpose of choosing
different departments is to cover the employees of different work nature and to get the information from the major
operating units in the organizations.
Questionnaire Design
These five-point Likert scale was selected as the response mode for the questionnaire. For each of the dimensions
the respondents are asked to tell whether and how strong they agree or disagree with the suggestion that is made.
This is done by choosing a number given on a five- point scale. The responses can then be given scores e.g. from 1
to 5 as was done in this research. Then the scores can be summed for each of the respondents in order to give
attitudinal score for each question.
Data collection
Primary data
Primary data was collected both survey method by distributing questionnaires to hospital employees. The
questionnaires where carefully designed by taking into account the parameters of my study.
Secondary data
Besides the primary data, the secondary data was also collected for the study. Websites and books, Articles written
by various authors were referred for this purpose from the library to facilitate proper understating of the study.
Tools of analysis
The data collected from both the sources is analyses and interpreted in the systematic manner with the help of
statistical tool like percentage analysis and SPSS tool.
Age
3 Age between 18 and 25 14 17.5
55 68.75
Innovation is appreciated
Agree 41 51
12 Strongly Agree 33 41
Neither Agree nor Disagree 1 1
Disagree 5 6
Locker Facilities are Satisfactory
Agree 4 5
Strongly Agree 25 31
13
Neither Agree nor Disagree 6 8
Disagree 36 45
Strongly Disagree 9 11
Shift timings are Satisfactory
Agree 12 15
14 Strongly Agree 62 78
Neither Agree nor Disagree 2 3
Disagree 4 5
Discipline is Maintained by all employees irrespective of the
designation
15
Agree 3 4
Strongly Agree 77 96
Organization is concerned with motivating employees
Agree
16
Strongly Agree 26 32
54 68
Motivation is High through Non-Monetary Rewards
17 Agree 28 35
Strongly Agree 52 65
Motivation is High through Monetary Rewards
Agree
18
Strongly Agree 43 54
37 46
Working Conditions are encouraging
Agree 28 35
19 Strongly Agree 47 59
Neither Agree nor Disagree 4 5
Disagree 1 1
Neutral 13 16
Well Motivated 37 46
Highly Motivated 24 30
Level of Satisfaction through monetary rewards
Neutral 2 3
28
Well Motivated 38 48
Highly Motivated 40 50
Level of Satisfaction through non-monetary rewards
Never Motivated 5 6
Sometimes Motivated 7 9
29
Neutral 22 28
Well Motivated 33 41
Highly Motivated 13 16
Level of satisfaction at time of receiving appraisal rating
Never Motivated 7 9
Sometimes Motivated 7 9
30
Neutral 2 3
Well Motivated 41 51
Highly Motivated 23 29
Anova Test 1
Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no significant relationship between provision of monetary Rewards and
employee motivation.
Alternate Hypothesis (H1): There is a significant relationship between provision of monetary rewards and
employee motivation.
Anova
Sum of
Model df Mean Square F Sig.
Squares
Regression .006 1 .006 .160 .690b
1 Residual 2.741 78 .035
Total 2.747 79
a. Dependent Variable: EmplMotivation
b. Predictors: (Constant), MontRewards
Since the Significance level is 0.690, which is more than 0.05, the null hypothesis is accepted. Therefore this table
indicates that there is no significant relationship between provision of monetary Rewards and employee motivation.
Anova Test 2:
Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no significant relationship between provision of non-monetary Rewards
and employee Satisfaction.
Alternate Hypothesis (H1): There is a significant relationship between provision of non-monetary rewards
and employee Satisfaction.
Anova
Sum of
Model df Mean Square F Sig.
Squares
Regression .045 1 .045 .100 .752b
1 Residual 35.016 78 .449
Total 35.061 79
a. Dependent Variable: EmplSatisfaction
b. Predictors: (Constant), NonMontRewards
Since the Significance level is 0.752, which is more than 0.05, the null hypothesis is accepted. Therefore this table
indicates that there is no significant relationship between provision of non-monetary Rewards and employee
Satisfaction.
Anova Test 3:
Null Hypothesis (H0) :There is no significant relationship between Employee motivation and Performance
appraisal
Alternate Hypothesis (H1) :There is a significant relationship between Employee motivation and
Performance appraisal
Anova
Sum of
Model df Mean Square F Sig.
Squares
Regression 1.012 1 1.012 4.649 .034b
1 Residual 16.976 78 .218
Total 17.987 79
a. Dependent Variable: EmpMotivation
b. Predictors: (Constant), PerfAppraisal
Since the Significance level is 0.034, which is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected. Therefore this table
indicates that there is a significant relationship between Employee motivation and Performance appraisal.
SUGGESTIONS
The researchers have a few suggestions regarding the functions performed in the Five Star Hotel with respect to
Employee motivation and Satisfaction. Some of the suggestions are:
The Hotel can introduce many more activities for increasing the overall employee satisfaction, as there is a
recent spike in positive behavior of employees when it comes to participation in activities. They see it as a
stress buster.
The department of human resource at the hotel still follow traditional methods to maintain database of
employees for certain processes alone. It is highly recommended that they soon digitalize all their data, So
that it would be easier for them to access data when needed, which would also save a lot of time for both the
HR department and the Employees.
A lot of files get lost easily due to the busy schedule of the admin. Better handling of data is advised by all
and not only one member of the HR department.
The Human resource department must have the ability to manage all the other employees in the
organization. They must manage the control that they have over them from time to time, when and
wherever need. As many procedures are not followed as per the routine due to poor cooperation from other
departments. This might be caused due to lack of Employee motivation.
CONCLUSION
The researchers had undergone an internship period of two months, in a reputed five star hotel in Chennai, as part of
the course requirement. The objectives of the study were achieved successfully by the researchers. The researchers
had successfully studied about the impact of rewards and recognition programs on Employee motivation and
satisfaction in A Five Star hotel. During this study the researchers learned about the importance of employee
motivation and employee satisfaction. The researchers also realized the importance of the role played by the
rewards and recognition programs in the way the employees perform their job and behave at the workplace. They
also realized how the monetary and non-monetary rewards affect the employee motivation and employee
satisfaction levels respectively. The key results indicate that there is not much of a significant impact on Employee
motivation and Employee satisfaction by Monetary Rewards and Non-Monetary Rewards (Recognition activities
and Programs) respectively. But there is a significant impact on employee motivation by Performance Appraisal in
the five star Hotel. The majority of the employees in the Organization are very much satisfied with the existing
reward and recognition programs. The research was performed by collecting data with help of a questionnaire but
some of the data was also obtained by observing the functions of the Human Resource department at the five star
hotel located in Chennai, which was very helpful.
REFERENCES
1. Lindner, J. R. (1998). Understanding employee motivation. Journal of extension, 36(3), 1-8.
2. Kreitner, R. (1995). Management (6th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
3. Buford, J. A., Jr., Bedeian, A. G., & Lindner, J. R. (1995). Management in Extension (3rd ed.). Columbus,
Ohio: Ohio State University Extension.
4. Higgins, J. M. (1994). The management challenge (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan
5. C. C. Pinder, Motivation in Work Organizations, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998.
6. R. Luomanpaa, “Employee motivation at Tommy Bartlett, Inc,” B. thesis, Dept. Applied Sciences, Haaga-
Helia Univ., Wisconsin Dells, USA, 2012.
7. S. Ramlall, “A review of employee motivation theories and their implications in employee retention within
organizations,” Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, vol. 5, pp. 52-63, 2004.
8. Tomaževič, N., Seljak, J., & Aristovnik, A. (2014). Factors influencing employee satisfaction in the police
service: the case of Slovenia. Personnel review, 43(2), 209-227.
9. Terera, S. R., & Ngirande, H. (2014). The impact of rewards on job satisfaction and employee
retention. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 481.
10. Parker, O. & Whright, L. (2001).”Pay and employee commitment: the missing link”. Ivey Business
Journal, 65, i3, pp.70-79.
11. Davies.R, (2001). “How to boost staff retention.” In people management, v7,i8, April 19,pp54-56.
12. Khuong, M. N., & Hoang, D. T. (2015). The effects of leadership styles on employee motivation in
auditing companies in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. International Journal of Trade, Economics and
Finance, 6(4), 210.
13. Essays, UK. (November 2013). The Importance of Reward Management Business Essay. Retrieved from
https://www.ukessays.com/essays/business/the-importance-of-reward-management-business-essay.php?v
ref=1
14. Smith, G. P. (1994). Motivation. In W. Tracey (ed.), Human resources management and development
handbook (2nd ed.).
15. Smith, K. L. (1990). The future of leaders in Extension. Journal of Extension, 28 (1).
16. Bowen, B. E., & Radhakrishna, R. B. (1991). Job satisfaction of agricultural education faculty: A constant
phenomena. Journal of Agricultural Education, 32 (2). 16-22.
17. Kovach, K. A. (1987). What motivates employees? Workers and supervisors give different answers.
Business Horizons, 30. 58-65.
18. Wong, S., Siu, V., Tsang, N., 1999. The impact of demographic factors on Hong Kong hotel employees’
choice of job-related motivators. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 11 (5),
230–241.
19. Byrne, D., 1986. Waiting for change: working in hotel and catering. Low pay unit, Pamphlet No. 42, LPU,
GMBATU p.v.
20. Chiang, C. F., & Jang, S. S. (2008). An expectancy theory model for hotel employee
motivation. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27(2), 313-322.
21. Brayfield, A.H. & Crockett, W.H. (1955), “Employee attitudes and employee performance”, Psychological
Bulletin, Vol. 52, pp. 396-424.
22. Landy, F.J. (1989), Psychology of work behaviour, Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
23. Testa, M.R., Skaruppa, C. & Pietrzak, D. (1998), “Linking Job Satisfaction and Customer Satisfaction in
the Cruise Industry: Implications for Hospitality and Travel Organizations”, Journal of Hospitality and
Tourism Research, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 4-14, http://doi.org/10.1177/109634809802200102
24. Laškarin Ažić, M. (2017), The impact of hotel employee satisfaction on hospitability performance,
Tourism and Hospitality Management, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 105-117, https://doi.org/10.20867/thm.23.1.8