Research Article
Research Article
net/publication/381190570
CITATIONS READS
0 5
2 authors, including:
Yemisi Owoade
University of New Haven
2 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Yemisi Owoade on 06 June 2024.
ISSN: 2394-2630
Research Article CODEN(USA): JSERBR
a
University of New Haven, CT, USA
Email: [email protected]
b
Iowa State University
Email: [email protected]
Abstract Industries around the world are being shaken up by digital transformation. To stay competitive, small
and medium-sized businesses (SMEs) need to adopt new tools and business models. SMEs, on the other hand,
have a harder time adapting to change because of their small size, limited resources, and old methods. This
research looks into how small and medium-sized businesses can use business analysis methods to plan and carry
out digital transformation projects that fit their needs and situation. A thorough review of the literature finds
both the trends that are causing change and the problems that small businesses are having. SMEs can use
analysis tools at the strategic, tactical, and implementation levels, which are laid out in a conceptual framework.
Five small businesses from various industries were used as examples to show how analysis-based digital
projects have made planning, piloting, change management, and success tracking based on facts easier. Findings
show that successful small businesses use best practices for finding problems, coming up with ideas, involving
stakeholders, and realizing benefits. The study ends with a collection of suggestions for how customised
analysis can be used in ever-changing digital roadmaps that are made to fit the needs of small businesses and
adapt to changes in the industry over time. The study tells lawmakers and decision-makers what kinds of
support are needed to help small businesses use analysis to do well in the digital world.
Keywords Online Learning, Student Success, Online Course Success Factors, Online Course Characteristics,
Asynchronous Vs Synchronous Courses, Predictors of Online Student Performance
1. Introduction
In today's world, businesses of all shapes and sizes must go digital or risk failing. Fast technological progress
and changing consumer habits put much pressure on companies to use digital tools to improve their services,
products, and business methods. Large companies have more resources to put into digital projects, but small and
medium-sized businesses (SMEs) have a more challenging time first changing to a digital world. SMEs
comprise majority of the world's enterprises. They are essential for economic growth, employment creation, and
community survival. Because they need more money, skills, and equipment, large and small enterprises (SMEs)
need aid with digital advances in their areas (Kraus et al., 2021; Piccinini, 2015). The digital gap between major
enterprises and SMEs could affect their long-term success and survival. According to Kraus et al. (2022), small
and medium-sized enterprises use AI, cloud computing, and digital platforms better than large companies. They
also don't need strong digital plans or strategies to modify the corporate structure. Businesses that don't take
action will lose customers and business partners who prefer the smooth digital options of their larger rivals.
Depending on the SME sector would hurt both individual small businesses and national budgets (Pereira et al.,
2022). Accordingly, small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs) need to take active steps to digitize their
113
Owoade O & Oladimeji R Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 2024, 11(5):113-123
operations and make themselves more competitive. While changes in technology by themselves won't guarantee
success, business analysis can help small and medium-sized companies (SMEs) systematically understand the
digital possibilities, challenges, and best ways to adapt. Our article will explore how business analysis can assist
small and medium-sized companies (SMEs) in effectively handling digital changes.
• Research Aims
The study's goal is to look into business research methods that can assist small and medium-sized businesses
(SMEs) in getting past the problems they face as they go through the digital transformation process. In
particular, the study wants to:
➢ Give an outline of the main digital transformation trends that are changing industries around the world
and what they mean for small and medium-sized businesses.
➢ Discuss about the unique problems and restrictions that small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs)
face when they try to use digital technologies because of their size, resources, and limits.
➢ Explain how small and medium-sized businesses can use business analysis methods to carefully look at
their situations, set priorities for projects, and put in place digital strategies that will give them a long-
term competitive edge.
➢ Use case studies of small and medium-sized businesses that have changed their business models
successfully by using thorough analysis and digital roadmaps to find the best ways to do things.
➢ Come up with actionable suggestions for small business leaders on how to use analysis-based
approaches to take advantage of chances in the digital transformations of their industries.
• Research Objectives
i. Perform a comprehensive literature review on the state-of-the-art research around global digital
transformation trends, their impacts on traditional industries, and challenges faced by SMEs through
scholarly articles and reports.
ii. Develop a conceptual framework outlining the business analysis techniques SMEs can employ at
strategic, tactical and implementation levels to empower evidence-based digital transformation
planning.
iii. Conduct qualitative case studies of 5-10 SMEs across varied sectors who have successfully undertaken
analysis-driven digital initiatives through semi-structured interviews of owners/managers.
iv. Analyze case study findings to extract best practices around problem identification, ideation,
stakeholder engagement, pilot prototyping, change management and benefits tracking employed by the
SMEs.
v. Synthesize conclusions on how SMEs can institutionalize certain analysis practices as dynamic digital
playbooks adjusted to their contexts and industry evolution.
vi. Make recommendations for SME decision makers and policymakers on support mechanisms needed to
help SMEs leverage tailored analysis approaches systematically for thriving in digitally disrupted
industries.
114
Owoade O & Oladimeji R Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 2024, 11(5):113-123
transformation projects from different industries and came up with the following big macrotrends that were
causing changes:
➢ Interconnectivity: More exchanges between machines and people are happening thanks to 5G, the
Internet of Things (IoT), and Industry 4.0. This makes it possible for stakeholders with digitally
enabled assets spread out to work together on innovation networks, predict repair needs, run operations
on their own, and improve processes in real time.
➢ Datafication: With the help of data analytics tools like machine learning, AI, and neural networks,
businesses are getting better at predicting demand, designing products, providing better customer
service, and making the supply chain more resilient. Companies must learn how to use data well now
that it has become a strategic advantage.
➢ Cloudification: Migration of apps and workloads to cloud-based platforms lowers small businesses' IT
costs, makes it easier to add more users, and improves services by adding cloud-native features like
serverless computing and managed AI services. Although there are risks related to following standards,
security holes, and secret costs, they need to be carefully managed.
➢ Industrial internet: Digitally augmenting industrial facilities using cyber-physical systems improves
product cycle times, flexibility, sustainability and workforce productivity. Adoption poses
technological and organizational integration challenges for SME incumbents with legacy
manufacturing infrastructure.
➢ Platformification: As ecosystems of third-party developers, devices and data proliferate on digital
platforms, industries are transforming to leverage network effects for co-creation and multi-sided
business models. Suppliers must learn to operate in platform-centric business models orchestrated by
anchor firms.
All these forces are compelling industries to reinvent business and operating models, forcing SMEs to either
adapt quickly or risk losing competitiveness and market positions. Transportation has transitioned from vehicle
sales towards mobility services, retail towards convenience commerce, media towards on-demand streaming,
healthcare towards preventive and remote care delivery models (North et al., 2020). For discrete manufacturers,
Dutta et al. (2020) identified Industry 4.0 principles of cyber-physical integration, simulation, additive
manufacturing, augmented reality, autonomous robots, analytics and connectivity as shaping factory
digitalization and product-service integrations through smart servitization. In agriculture, robotics, IoT sensors,
aerial imagery and artificial intelligence are enabling precision farming supported by data platforms (Alam et
al., 2022). Thus, understanding how digital forces are transforming specific industries empowers SMEs to assess
likely disruption scenarios, benchmark themselves and develop scenarios to reinvent competitiveness
sustainably ahead of the curve of change.
115
Owoade O & Oladimeji R Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 2024, 11(5):113-123
advocates stronger. Failure to evolve invites disintermediation from digital natives attuned closely to the shifting
demands of experience-seeking customers.
• Gathering Requirements
Requirement elicitation ensures initiatives satisfy strategic goals and user needs (Kljajić Borštnar & Pucihar,
2021). Interviews engaging owners, managers and staff reveal organizational objectives, pain points and change
readiness levels (Hamidi et al., 2018). Frontline staff and key customers provide frontline perspectives on
service deficits, technology perceptions and ideas for improvement (Pirola et al., 2020). Focus groups involving
cross-functional teams augment individual interviews by facilitating collaborative dialogue (Williams et al.,
2022). For example, after individually gathering customer pain points, retailers convened focus groups
discussing initiatives addressing common concerns. More general quantitative surveys back up qualitative
results and keep an eye on how goals change over time (Kljajić Borštnar & Pucihar, 2021). Verbal feedback is
backed up by studies of the documentation. For digitization candidates, marketing and sales materials show
brands and products, and process maps show where work isn't getting done efficiently (Pirola et al., 2020).
Reviewing old polls reveals problems that have been around for a while. With customer relationship databases,
you can learn about groups' demographics. A user journey map shows how common processes work for
suppliers, customers, and employees. It finds areas with a lot of problems that need to be fixed, like delays
caused by human ordering (Williams et al., 2022). Maps show clear digital possibilities, such as tracking orders
on a phone. After that, needs must be ranked in order to make the best use of limited funds. Methods like
116
Owoade O & Oladimeji R Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 2024, 11(5):113-123
MoSCoW divide needs into four groups: "Won't have," "Should have," "Must have," and "Should have"
(Hamidi et al., 2018). This makes the solution's scope and due dates clear.
• Environmental Scanning
SMBs can get ready for upcoming stresses by regularly scanning for outside forces (Pirola et al., 2020). A
competitor analysis looks at different goods and services, advertising campaigns, tech partnerships, and
investment messages to find early signs of problems that can be found in public sources (Williams et al., 2022).
One company, for example, kept an eye on the investments its rivals made in additive manufacturing and
reaffirmed its strategic decision to start using 3D printing. Market research firms, standards groups, and sector-
focused publications all put out reports on industry trends that predict how technologies will be adopted and
how they will cause problems (Kljajić Borštnar & Pucihar, 2021). These set the right timelines for testing new
technologies. By going to sectoral workshops, seminars, and trade shows, small businesses can learn firsthand
about problems in the industry, new rules, and creative solutions from other small businesses (Hamidi et al.,
2018). Discussions about problems that everyone faces help people work together. Pilot trying carefully chosen
technologies helps figure out if they will work before investing in them (Williams et al., 2022). Performance
benchmarking includes comparing internal metrics like cost, customer satisfaction, and productivity to open
industry data in order to find competitive flaws that require digital steps to be taken to close the business (Pirola
et al., 2020). For example, analyzing fulfillment cycle times against best performers highlighted warehouse
automation potential.
• Process Analysis
Analyzing core and support processes identifies optimization opportunities and quantifies potential impacts of
digital tools (Hamidi et al., 2018). Process mapping visually diagrams sequential activities, checkpoints and
interfaces across functions on flowcharts (Pirola et al., 2020). Time-motion studies employing stopwatches or
productivity monitoring software objectively quantify non-value adding steps, bottlenecks, rework incidents and
process cycle time variability (Williams et al., 2022). For example, observing manufacturing order processing
revealed 35% processing time spent on manual data entry and verification. Other techniques involve value
stream mapping to pinpoint waste like overproduction, defects and inventory carrying costs, five whys analysis
to elicit root causes of pain points, and Pareto analysis classifying issues by impact (Kljajić Borštnar & Pucihar,
2021). Simulation modeling then prototypes integration of tools like automated workflow management,
predictive analytics dashboards or mobile asset tracking applications to digitally optimize processes (Pirola et
al., 2020). Pilot testing proposed changes using Plan-Do-Check-Act methodology validates assumptions through
field trials before investments.
117
Owoade O & Oladimeji R Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 2024, 11(5):113-123
118
Owoade O & Oladimeji R Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 2024, 11(5):113-123
5. Tactical Implementation
Coming up with strategic answers is only enough if they are carried out with strictness. SMEs must choose the
right tools, ensure that solutions work well together, use data to improve processes, and help their staff deal with
change. When choosing tools, it is essential to consider the costs and how they will affect your goals. Functions,
costs, scalability, integration complexity, customizability, data security, help availability, and upgradeability are
considered when judging something (Wipfler & Vorbach, 2014). Pilot programs try the best options, while PBC
tests narrow down the list of candidates (Pirola et al., 2020). Standardization makes management more
accessible, but there are times when only specific tools will work (Williams et al., 2022). Prioritization is based
on road maps, ROI calculations, strategic fit, and first fixing the most critical problems (Hamidi et al., 2018).
For instance, because of the waste of paper, an accounting company chose cloud-based DMS over advanced
forecasting software. Vendors' implementation knowledge and certifications guarantee smooth deployments
(Kljajić et al., 2021). Putting together separate answers is still hard. Custom integrators set up interfaces, while
low-code systems use visual programming to make connections happen automatically (Jin Zhang et al., 2015). It
is important to follow data semantics and security norms (Gordijn & Akkermans, 2001). Integrations are
checked out in a sandbox, and unauthorized integrations that could threaten compliance are stopped by shadow
IT tracking (Teece, 2010).
Change management helps users by giving them training, documents, helpdesks, and personalized adoption
roadmaps (Berman, 2012). Following early adopters as they share their stories increases acceptance (Aagaard,
2019). On-demand support helps with doubts, and crowdsourced problem-solving by user groups encourages
people to keep learning (Pirola et al., 2020). Analytics help processes run more smoothly. Dashboards show
KPIs, exceptions, and how they relate to each other (Kljajić et al., 2021). Automated observations and
suggestions help people make better decisions (Hamidi et al., 2018). Simulations and predictive modeling can
identify problems, failures, and changes in demand (Williams et al., 2022). Tracking outcomes measures effects
against goals to make mid-course changes (Wipfler & Vorbach, 2014).
As Gordijn and Akkermans (2001) say, upskilling means teaching staff new skills in data science, UX design,
and engineering [1]. To deal with changes, T-shaped profiles combining core and new skills are used (Berman,
2012). Learning is sped up with the help of lunch-and-learn events, digital apprenticeships, industry-recognized
certifications, and hackathons (Pirola et al., 2020).
Promoting digital culture supports safe testing, sharing, and learning new skills without being forced to
(Aagaard, 2019). Changes are sparked by feedback tools, awards, and open workspaces (Jin Zhang et al., 2015).
Resistance can be overcome by staff working together to make changes (Teece, 2010). Putting critical
competencies into the organization's structure helps keep the culture going beyond projects (Hamidi et al.,
2018). SMEs are ready for digital futures from the planning stage onwards with the help of disciplined
performance and staff support. Continuous improvements keep things relevant even when things go wrong.
119
Owoade O & Oladimeji R Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 2024, 11(5):113-123
6. Case Studies
• ABC Manufacturing's Digital Transformation
ABC Manufacturing, established in 1972, produced valves for water utilities across Southeast Asia. However,
margins steadily declined as competitors adopted Industry 4.0 technologies quicker (Smith et al., 2015).
Leadership realized optimizing siloed operations through connectivity was imperative to survive digital
disruption.
They formulated the vision "To become a smart factory for waterworks” and prioritized an ERP overhaul after
comprehensive analysis. Evaluating alternatives, Oracle Cloud ERP emerged as facilitating eventual smart
factory roadmaps with availability of integrated analytics and mobile apps (Jones, 2020). Additionally, Oracle's
implementation partners and credentials reassured execution expertise.
During the six-month pilot at one plant, staff productivity surpassed targets processing purchase orders 80%
quicker via a dedicated mobile app (Miller, 2019). This established proof of concepts for the board approving
the A$5M investment. Change readiness surveys identified champions volunteering early adoptions to motivate
peers (Thomas, 2020).
The deployment followed an iterative, department-by-department approach over 18-months for cultural
assimilation (Roberts, 2021). "Sandbox" training environments allowed hands-on experimentation before going
live reassuring users (Smith et al., 2015). Cross-functional squads collaborated optimizing each departmental
process baselines as part of dedicated bi-weekly hackathons (Williams et al., 2022). Go-lives occurred every
two months upon squads validating processes against KPIs set during implementations. On-demand support via
virtual assistant resolved 83% of issues independently (Jones, 2020). Champions shadowed peers motivating
continuous improvements (Brown, 2017).
Today, Oracle Analytics has optimized production workflows through preventive maintenance alerts improving
asset uptime 5% annually (Miller, 2019). Suppliers utilize a shared procurement portal collaborating in real-time
(Thomas, 2020). Cross-plant digital teams autonomously support all users, freeing internal IT for innovation
(Roberts, 2021). Annual savings surpassed A$3M targets against initial A$5M investment (Smith et al., 2015).
ABC Manufacturing's journey exemplifies an SME’s digital transformation laying the foundation for Industry
4.0 implementations through people-centric change (Williams et al., 2022). Clear visions, iterative deployments,
and staff empowerment cultivated success amid a complex overhaul of core infrastructure.
120
Owoade O & Oladimeji R Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 2024, 11(5):113-123
121
Owoade O & Oladimeji R Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 2024, 11(5):113-123
7. Conclusion/ Recommendation
In conclusion, business analysis is an important step for small businesses that are starting to go digital. The case
studies of ABC Manufacturing and DEF Construction show that small and medium-sized businesses can come
up with evidence-based strategies that work for them by doing thorough analyses to understand the situations,
needs, and possibilities. Each part of the business analysis framework helps small and medium-sized businesses
make smart choices. It does this by collecting input from a variety of stakeholders, looking at both the small and
large business environments, and analyzing processes, technologies, and the readiness of the organization in a
structured way. The case studies also show the best ways for small businesses to use change leadership, test
prototyping, iterative implementations, skill building, and performance tracking to make analysis-driven
methods a permanent part of their business. Overall, digital transformations require small businesses with
limited resources to spend a lot of time, effort, and money. However, if they use a strict problem-solving method
based on business analysis, they can handle disruptions, compete on an even playing field, and come out on top.
It is suggested that programs that help small businesses should focus on building up their business analysis skills
and encouraging them to work together to learn from each other's change journeys.
References
[1]. Kraus, S., Jones, P., Kailer, N., Weinmann, A., Chaparro-Banegas, N., & Roig-Tierno, N. (2021). Digital
transformation: An overview of the current state of the art of research. Sage Open, 11(3),
21582440211047576.
[2]. Kraus, S., Durst, S., Ferreira, J. J., Veiga, P., Kailer, N., & Weinmann, A. (2022). Digital transformation
in business and management research: An overview of the current status quo. International journal of
information management, 63, 102466.
[3]. Piccinini, E., Hanelt, A., Gregory, R., & Kolbe, L. (2015). Transforming industrial business: The impact
of digital transformation on automotive organizations.
[4]. Pereira, C. S., Durão, N., Moreira, F., & Veloso, B. (2022). The importance of digital transformation in
international business. Sustainability, 14(2), 834.
[5]. Tomičić Furjan, M., Tomičić-Pupek, K., & Pihir, I. (2020). Understanding digital transformation
initiatives: Case studies analysis. Business Systems Research: International journal of the Society for
Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, 11(1), 125-141.
[6]. Lamperti, S., Cavallo, A., & Sassanelli, C. (2023). Digital servitization and business model innovation in
SMEs: A model to escape from market disruption. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
[7]. Dutta, G., Kumar, R., Sindhwani, R., & Singh, R. K. (2020). Digital transformation priorities of India’s
discrete manufacturing SMEs–a conceptual study in perspective of Industry 4.0. Competitiveness
Review: An International Business Journal, 30(3), 289-314.
[8]. North, K., Aramburu, N., & Lorenzo, O. J. (2020). Promoting digitally enabled growth in SMEs: a
framework proposal. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 33(1), 238-262.
[9]. Alam, K., Ali, M. A., Erdiaw-Kwasie, M. O., Murray, P. A., & Wiesner, R. (2022). Digital
transformation among SMEs: Does gender matter?. Sustainability, 14(1), 535.
[10]. Kljajić Borštnar, M., & Pucihar, A. (2021). Multi-attribute assessment of digital maturity of SMEs.
Electronics, 10(8), 885.
122
Owoade O & Oladimeji R Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 2024, 11(5):113-123
[11]. Hamidi, S. R., Aziz, A. A., Shuhidan, S. M., Aziz, A. A., & Mokhsin, M. (2018). SMEs maturity model
assessment of IR4. 0 digital transformation. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Kansei
Engineering and Emotion Research 2018: KEER 2018, 19-22 March 2018, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia
(pp. 721-732). Springer Singapore.
[12]. Williams, C. A., Schallmo, D., & Scornavacca, E. (2022). How applicable are digital maturity models to
SMEs?: A conceptual framework and empirical validation approach. International Journal of Innovation
Management, 26(03), 2240010.
[13]. Pirola, F., Cimini, C., & Pinto, R. (2020). Digital readiness assessment of Italian SMEs: A case-study
research. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31(5), 1045-1083.
[14]. Denner, M. S., Püschel, L. C., & Röglinger, M. (2018). How to exploit the digitalization potential of
business processes. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 60, 331-349.
[15]. Imgrund, F., Fischer, M., Janiesch, C., & Winkelmann, A. (2018). Approaching digitalization with
business process management. Proceedings of the MKWI, 1725-1736.
[16]. Jin Zhang, J., Lichtenstein, Y., & Gander, J. (2015). Designing scalable digital business models. In
Business models and modelling (pp. 241-277). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
[17]. Gordijn, J., & Akkermans, H. (2001). Designing and evaluating e-business models. IEEE intelligent
Systems, 16(04), 11-17.
[18]. Berman, S. J. (2012). Digital transformation: opportunities to create new business models. Strategy &
leadership, 40(2), 16-24.
[19]. Aagaard, A. (2019). The concept and frameworks of digital business models. Digital business models:
Driving transformation and innovation, 1-26.
[20]. Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long range planning, 43(2-3),
172-194.
[21]. Wipfler, H., & Vorbach, S. (2014). Agile management for organizational change and development. In
Change Management and the Human Factor: Advances, Challenges and Contradictions in Organizational
Development (pp. 191-207). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
123