Topic 3 Basics I
Topic 3 Basics I
TOPIC 3 SUMMARY
Basics of Opioid
Prescribing — Part I
DESCRIPTION EXAMPLES
Natural opiates Derived from the opium Codeine, morphine
poppy
Semisynthetic opioids Directly derived from natural Hydrocodone, hydromorphone,
opiates oxycodone, oxymorphone, and
buprenorphine
Synthetic opioids Created in the laboratory Methadone, meperidine, and fentanyl
Opioids are powerful analgesic medications that can be effective in treating chronic
pain. They work by directly affecting ascending and descending pain signals in the cen-
tral nervous system and preventing activation of peripheral nociceptors. All opioids also
activate the reward system in the brain and, with chronic exposure, cause physiologic
adaptations, namely tolerance and physical dependence.
Opioids also have the potential to cause severe adverse effects, and opioid misuse can
be fatal. The challenge for the clinician then is to reduce opioid prescriptions where
possible while ensuring safer prescribing when indicated.
Opioids are not first-line therapy for chronic non–cancer-related pain because of their
potential risks, lack of evidence of long-term efficacy, and the possibility of tolerance
or hyperalgesia. However, opioids may be appropriate on a trial basis for patients with
chronic pain if the following conditions are met:
• The pain is severe and has a significant effect on function and quality of life.
• The pain has not responded favorably to other appropriate interventions, or the
other available interventions represent higher risk (e.g., NSAIDs in a patient with
chronic kidney disease).
• The benefits of opioid therapy are expected to outweigh the risks.
Opioids are a mainstay for severe cancer pain, where they can help achieve pain control
in 70% to 90% of patients. They are also beneficial for symptom control in palliative
and end-of-life care.
2. Establish clear functional goals with the patient. Goals should be SMART:
• Specific about what the patient will set out to do
• Measurable, so that you and the patient can determine whether the goal has
been met
• Action-oriented (rather than passive)
• Realistic with respect to the patient’s current condition
• Time-bound, so that the goal is being measured within a very specific time frame
Once a patient has been taking a short-acting opioid for at least one week, they may
transition to an extended-release/long-acting (ER/LA) opioid. The main reason to do
this is the longer duration of analgesia; studies have not demonstrated any substantial
benefit otherwise. Of note, there is a higher risk of harm with misuse of ER/LA opioids
because of the concentrated doses. Patients must be instructed to never disrupt (e.g.,
break or crush) the ER/LA opioid formulation.
Risk of Opioid Misuse and Opioid Use Disorder
One of the major risks of opioid therapy is the potential for misuse. Medication misuse
is defined as use contrary to the prescribed use, regardless of the presence or absence of
harm or adverse effects. Opioid use disorder (OUD) is defined as a pattern of continued
opioid use with experience of, or potential for, harm. All patients should be evaluated for
risk of opioid misuse before being prescribed opioids; this includes patients receiving
opioid analgesics for cancer-related pain.
A multifaceted approach is needed to help identify patients at risk. The first step is a
patient interview and medical record review to identify risk factors for the development
of OUD. These include:
Formal screening tools can be used to help identify patients at risk for misuse (see Tools
for Clinical Practice below), but they do not reliably predict misuse and should therefore
be used only with other clinical information, including longitudinal monitoring.
Importantly, even individuals who are initially deemed to be at low risk for misuse are
still at some risk. Furthermore, the risk of misuse can change over time. All patients
should therefore be monitored for misuse or risk of misuse with:
Moderate- and higher-risk patients may be candidates for opioid therapy but should be
monitored with greater frequency and provided more support; in these cases, comanage-
ment with an addiction medicine, psychiatric, or pain specialist should be considered as
appropriate.
If misuse of a medication is identified, the patient should be assessed for a substance
use disorder, and there should be either tightening of prescribing to assure safety or
tapering and cessation of opioids.
Response to treatment should be assessed at each visit; therapy can be continued if there
is good analgesia, improved function and quality of life, no or manageable adverse
effects, and no misuse or risk behaviors.
CAUSE INTERVENTION
Disease progression • Rule out disease progression as appropriate.
Co-occurring distress, such as increased • Advise lifestyle changes, medical interventions,
stress, depression, anxiety, poor sleep, or counseling, or referrals as indicated.
changes in physical activity
Opioid tolerance • If doses are low and tolerance is suspected: Consider
increasing the dose. Of note, it can take 5 half-lives
(2–3 days for most opioids) before the full effect of
the increased dose is apparent.
Breakthrough Pain
In patients taking ER/LA opioids, breakthrough pain can occur. This happens most
commonly with physical activity, stressors, or other triggers but can also occur sponta-
neously in some conditions (e.g., cancer, certain neuropathies).
OPIOID ROTATION
Opioid rotation may be beneficial not only in the setting of persistent adverse effects but
also in other situations, such as:
When patients rotate opioids, they generally end up taking a lower dose (as measured in
morphine milligram equivalents [MMEs]), so there are often fewer adverse effects but at
least an equivalent analgesic response. However, there are limited data on the effective-
ness of opioid rotation.
2. C
onvert the 24-hour intake of each opioid to MMEs using equivalency charts or
conversion factors, and determine the current total daily MME.
• Although opioid equivalency charts are useful, they are based on single studies in
non–opioid-tolerant, healthy volunteers and do not reflect individual differences
in genetics, comorbidities, or polypharmacy.
4. R
educe the calculated daily dose by 25% to 75% to account for incomplete
cross-tolerance. (Greater reductions may be required for methadone.)
5. P
rescribe the new opioid at the reduced calculated dose in appropriately divided
doses (once or twice daily for most ER/LA opioids). Consider making immediate-
release opioids available to the patient in case of increased pain.
6. Monitor carefully and adjust for sedation, adverse effects, or unrelieved pain.
LEARNING RESOURCES
• Opioid Efficacy for Chronic Pain: A slide (from Boston University School of
Medicine) summarizing the available evidence on the use of opioids for chronic
pain
• Minimum Level of Monitoring Based on Risk: A chart (from Boston University
School of Medicine) showing how frequently various tools should be used to
monitor opioid safety depending on the patient’s risk for opioid misuse
• Rotating Opioids to Manage Chronic Pain: An infographic from NEJM
Knowledge+ that describes why opioid rotations work, when to consider opioid
rotation, what to consider when selecting a new drug and the dose of the new
drug, how to counsel patients during a rotation, and the steps involved in one
rotation method.
• The Role of the Pain Psychologist in Managing Chronic Pain: An infographic
from NEJM Knowledge+ on the biopsychosocial model of pain, referring a
patient to a pain psychologist, the pain psychology assessment, and common
pain psychology interventions
Last reviewed Oct 2023. Last modified Oct 2023. The information included here is provided
for educational purposes only. It is not intended as a sole source on the subject matter or as
a substitute for the professional judgment of qualified health care professionals. Users are
advised, whenever possible, to confirm the information through additional sources.