Condition A Condition B

DONE COUNSELING NOT YET

7 5
8 4
10 7
8 6
7 7
6 5
4 3
7 4
8 4
9 5
TOTAL 74
MEAN 7.4

Annova
1. The following are the mileage obtained after several road tests were run using five different kinds of gas

Gas A Gas B Gas C Gas D

1st road test 35 61 38 65
2nd road test 31 63 54 60
3rd road test 42 50 47 57
4th road test 48 42 60 55
5th road test 40 49 55 60

Anova: Two-Factor Without Replication

SUMMARY Count Sum Average Variance

1st road test 5 255 51.00 186.50
2nd road test 5 277 55.40 215.30
3rd road test 5 266 53.20 117.70
4th road test 5 255 51.00 47.00
5th road test 5 252 50.40 57.30
 Gas A 5 196 39.20 42.70
Gas B 5 265 53.00 77.50
Gas C 5 254 50.80 72.70
Gas D 5 297 59.40 14.30
Gas E 5 293 58.60 107.80

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F
Rows 86.8 4 21.7 0.295943
Columns 1322 4 330.5 4.50733
Error 1173.2 16 73.325

Total 2582 24

1. The following table shows our Gross National Product (in million pesos) from 1981 to 1990. Forecast GNP in 1

Year GNP
1981 95722
1982 97539 there is no significant relationship in the increase o
1983 98620
1984 91644
1985 87867
1986 89611
1987 94705
1988 101093
1989 106855
1990 110143
1991 104656.3333
1992 107124.8
1993 110469.5644

SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.738009073
R Square 0.544657392
Adjusted R Square 0.50326261
Standard Error 5425.802864
Observations 13

ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 1 387352013.9 387352013.94 13.157633870953 0.003975
Residual 11 323832703.9 29439336.718
Total 12 711184717.8

Coefficients Standard Errort Stat P-value Lower 95%

Intercept -2799082.71 799147.5154 -3.5025857605 0.0049477234033 -4557995
Year 1458.872088 402.1872665 3.6273452925 0.0039750595991 573.6639
n using five different kinds of gasoline on a Toyota car. Test at a 5% level of significance if the kind of gasoline used gives better mileage.

Gas E STEP 1 Null Hypothesis

56 There is a significant relationship between the mileage and the used of gasoline
69
70 STEP 2 Level of Significance
50 0.05
48

STEP 3 Critical Value

Step 5 Conclusion
The level of significant value is 0.87 which higher than 0.05, there is significant rela
 P-value F crit
0.876304 3.006917
0.012512 3.006917

1981 to 1990. Forecast GNP in 1992; in 1993.

ant relationship in the increase of GNP accounted yearly.

Significance F
Upper 95%Lower 95%Upper 95%
-1040171 -4557995 -1040170.89981166
2344.08 573.6639 2344.08028608513
ne used gives better mileage.

ge and the used of gasoline

n 0.05, there is significant relatioship between kinds of gasoline used on toyota car that gives better mileage.
 Group 2

Members: Izel P. Almamento

Mcwain V. Faller
Gretchel C. Mejala
Cristy C. Lim
Marchie B. Laroa

1. The following are the mileage obtained after several road tests were run using five different kinds of gasoline on a Toyota car. Test at a 5% level of significance if the kind of gasoline used gives better mileage.

DATA Gas A Gas B Gas C Gas D Gas E Null Hypothesis

1st road test 35 61 38 65 56 Ho - There is a significant relationship between the mileage and the used of gasoline
2nd road test 31 63 54 60 69 H1 - There is no significant relationship between the mileage and the used of gasoline
3rd road test 42 50 47 57 70
4th road test 48 42 60 55 50
5th road test 40 49 55 60 48

Conclusion
The level of significant value is 0.87 which higher than 0.05, there is significant relatioship
Anova: Two-Factor Without Replication there is significant relatioship between kinds of gasoline used on toyota car that gives better mileage.

SUMMARY Count Sum Average Variance

1st road test 5 255 51.00 186.50
2nd road test 5 277 55.40 215.30
3rd road test 5 266 53.20 117.70
4th road test 5 255 51.00 47.00
5th road test 5 252 50.40 57.30

Gas A 5 196 39.20 42.70

Gas B 5 265 53.00 77.50
Gas C 5 254 50.80 72.70
Gas D 5 297 59.40 14.30
Gas E 5 293 58.60 107.80

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Rows 86.8 4 21.7000000000002 0.295943 0.876304 3.006917
Columns 1322 4 330.5 4.50733 0.012512 3.006917
Error 1173.2 16 73.325

Total 2582 24
 2. The following table shows our Gross National Product (in million pesos) from 1981 to 1990. Forecast GNP in 1992; in 1993.

Year GNP
1981 95722 Null Hypothesis
1982 97539 Ho - There is a significant relationship between the increase of Gross National Product as years goes by.
1983 98620 H1 - There is no significant relationship between the increase of Gross National Product as years goes by.
1984 91644
1985 87867
1986 89611
1987 94705
1988 101093
1989 106855
1990 110143
1991 104656.3333
1992 107124.8
1993 110469.5644

SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.738009073
R Square 0.544657392
Adjusted R Square 0.50326261
Standard Error 5425.802864
Observations 13

ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 1 387352013.94 387352013.94 13.1576338709531 0.003975
Residual 11 323832703.9 29439336.718
Total 12 711184717.83

Coefficients Standard Errort Stat P-value Lower 95%Upper 95%Lower 95%Upper 95%
Intercept -2799082.708 799147.51544 -3.5025857605 0.00494772340335 -4557995 -1040171 -4557995 -1040170.89981166
Year 1458.872088 402.18726652 3.6273452925 0.00397505959911 573.6639 2344.08 573.6639 2344.08028608513

Conclusion:
There is no significant relationship in the increase of GNP accounted yearly.