Library Management System
Library Management System
INDEX NUMBER:FOE.41.020.081.22
PROGRAM: INFORMATION SYSTEM & TECHNOLOGY
Sure, let’s approach this from a different angle to stand out. Here’s a fresh take
on the same project:
## 1. Stakeholder Identification
3. **Library Management**
- **Role**: Oversee the library’s operations, including budgeting and
strategic planning.
- **Interest**: Desire a system that provides comprehensive reports and
analytics to support decision-making and improve resource allocation.
4. **IT Staff**
- **Role**: Maintain the library’s technology infrastructure and provide
technical support.
- **Interest**: Need a system that is easy to maintain, secure, and integrates
well with existing infrastructure.
## 3. Functional Requirements
## 4. Non-Functional Requirements
1. **Performance**
- The system should handle concurrent access by multiple users without
significant lag.
- **Importance**: Ensures a smooth user experience, especially during peak
hours.
2. **Security**
- The system must protect member data and library records from
unauthorized access.
- **Importance**: Safeguards sensitive information and maintains user trust.
3. **Usability**
- The system should have an intuitive interface for users of all tech skill
levels.
- **Importance**: Ensures high adoption rates and reduces training time.
4. **Reliability**
- The system must be reliable with minimal downtime.
- **Importance**: Guarantees continuous library operations and user access.
5. **Scalability**
- The system should be scalable to accommodate future growth in the
library’s collection and membership.
- **Importance**: Allows the system to grow with the library’s needs.
```plaintext
+---------------------+
| Librarian |
+---------------------+
|
V
+---------------------+
| Manage Catalog |
+---------------------+
|
V
+---------------------+
| Issue/Return Books |
+---------------------+
|
V
+---------------------+
| Overdue Management |
+---------------------+
|
V
+---------------------+
| Generate Reports |
+---------------------+
```
```plaintext
+---------------------+
| Administrator |
+---------------------+
|
V
+---------------------+
| User Management |
+---------------------+
|
V
+---------------------+
| System Maintenance |
+---------------------+
```
## 6. Prioritization
Using the MoSCoW method (Must have, Should have, Could have, Won’t
have):
1. **Must Have**
- User Registration and Management
- Catalog Management
- Search Functionality
- Book Issuing and Returning
- Security
2. **Should Have**
- Reservation System
- Overdue Management
- Barcode Integration
3. **Could Have**
- Reporting and Analytics
- Online Catalog Access
- Interlibrary Loan Management
4. **Won’t Have**
- Advanced data analytics (for future enhancements)
**Rationale**: Core functions (Must Have) ensure the system meets basic
operational needs. Enhancements (Should Have and Could Have) improve
efficiency and user experience. Non-essential features (Won’t Have) can be
deferred to future updates.