Span 102 Proyecto Escrito 3. O23docx
Span 102 Proyecto Escrito 3. O23docx
Goal:
I can write about ingredients, recipes and meals (c 10 meta 2)
I can write about the past (meta from chapters 7-9)
I can give instructions in informal settings (c 10 meta 5)
I can present information, concepts and ideas about food in Ecuador and the United States (c
10 meta 6)
Format:
1) Use the Google doc for the entire writing process. If you do not, the work will not be
graded and you will receive a “0”. Name the file appropriately with topic and your
own name. Please no copying and pasting from another source.
2) Include your name and assignment on one line at the top left of the document, (i.e.
Name, Proyecto formal escrito #3).
3) Use Arial, 11-point font, 1.5 spacing, 1” margins
4) Use a traditional letter format, opening with Querido/a and the student’s name, and
closing with a special sign, perhaps, “Hasta enero,” and sign your name.
5) Use correct spelling, accent marks/tildes, divide into paragraphs, 0 pt paragraph
spacing.
Evaluation Criteria for Formal Writing #3
Content points
• addresses all aspects of the prompt; provides good support for and development of all ideas with 40 39 38 37
range of detail; substantive; treatment is sophisticated, strong intellectual engagement
• prompt addressed adequately; ideas not fully developed or supported with detail, though main 36 35 34 32
ideas are clear; less substance; treatment is appropriate; approaches topic with a spirit of exploration
• prompt not fully addressed; ideas not supported well; main ideas lack detailed development;
little substance; treatment is somewhat simplified 30 28 26 24
Organization
• well-framed and organized (with clear introduction, conclusion); coherent, cohesive; 20 19 18
smooth transitions from one idea to the next
• adequate, but loose organization with introduction and conclusion (though they may be limited
or one of the two may be missing); somewhat coherent, somewhat cohesive (good use of connective 17 16 15 14
words)
•.confusing, disconnected organization; lacks coherence, so much so that writing is difficult to follow 987
Vocabulary/Word Usage/Mechanics
• extensive variety of words; effective and appropriate word choice; few errors in spelling, punctuation,
capitalization, and use of accents; accurately follows format guidelines of assignment; original title 20 19 18
• occasional errors of word choice (few examples of "false" cognates), but none that obscure meaning;
occasional errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and use of accents, but meaning is not obscured 17 16 1514
formatting is almost perfect
• more consistent errors with word choice (frequent evidence of translation and “false" cognates)
that may obscure meaning; frequent errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and use of accents 13 12 11 10
that at times confuses or obscures meaning; formatting still has some problems
• very limited range of words; consistent and frequent errors with word choice (ample evidence 987
of translation) and meaning frequently obscured; dominated by errors in spelling, punctuation,
capitalization, and use of accents; missing basic format or title
Language Use/Grammar
• great variety of grammatical forms that are mostly accurate; complex sentence structure; evidence of
"Spanish-like" construction; few agreement errors overall, none that obscure meaning 20 19 18
• some variety of grammatical forms though not always accurate; attempts at complex sentence structure;
little evidence of "Spanish-like" construction; no clear translations from English; few errors with agreement, 17 16 15 14
none that obscure meaning
• less variety of grammatical forms; simplistic sentence structure; evidence of "English-like" 13 12 11 10
construction; consistent errors, but few of which may obscure meaning
• very little variety of grammatical forms; simplistic sentence structure that contains 987
consistent errors; evidence of translation from English; frequent and consistent errors
that may obscure meaning _______
Criteria adapted from Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition www.carla.umn.edu/assessment Total points 100