0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views

Marksheet

ff
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views

Marksheet

ff
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Amrutvahini Polytechnic, Sangamner

Department of Mechanical Engineering


Annexure –III & IV (Rubrics & Micro Project Evaluation Sheet)
Name of Student: Dhadwad Laxman Jayram Enrollment No: 2200800435
Name of Program: ME Semester: Fourth
Course Title: Manufacturing Processes Code: 22446
Title of Micro Project:Report on Metal Forming Process.
Course Outcomes: CI 404.4 Identify different forming processes.
Indicators for different levels of performance evaluation scale (1 to 2)
Criteria A) Process & Product Assessment (Performance in Group Activity Out of 6)
Poor (1) Marks Average (1.5) Marks Good (2) Marks
At least two
Literature No reference is used At least one reference
references website
review / only taken material website or book is referred
or book are referred
Information from Google and copy to collect literature or
to collect literature
collection pasted information
or information
a) Well assembled /
a) Just assembled /
a) Quality of a) Incomplete fabricated with
fabricated, not in proper
prototype/ fabrication / assembly / proper shape
shape, dimensions /
model / chart / survey dimensions / well
average survey
drawing b) Most of the content defined survey
b) Most of the portion in
b) Quality of is non-relevant. Report b) Everything in the
project report irrelevant
project report / drawing is not project report is
and is formatted but some
(for study formatted as per formatted as per
of the portion is remaining
project) instructions. the instructions
to format.
given.
No previous review and No previous review but Reviewed &
Timely
submission after the submission on or before submission on or
submission.
given date. given date. before given date.
Indicators for different levels of performance evaluation scale (1 to 2)
Criteria B) Individual Presentation/Viva (Out of 4)
Poor (1) Marks Average (1.5) Marks Good (2) Marks
Major information is Included major Well organized,
Presentation
not included, information but not well included major
of the micro
information is not well organized and not information, well
project
organized presented well presented
Answer to
Could not reply to Replied to considerable
sample Replied most of the
considerable number number of questions but
questions questions properly.
of question. not very properly.
(Oral)

(A) (B)
Process & Product Individual Presentation/Viva Total Marks
Assessment (06) (04) (10)

Comments/ Suggestions about team work/leadership/Inter-personal communication (if Any)

Name & Designation of the Teacher: Prof. Ingole M.W


Dated Signature:

You might also like