ESeiz An Edge-Device For Accurate Seizure Detection For Smart Healthcare
ESeiz An Edge-Device For Accurate Seizure Detection For Smart Healthcare
Abstract—Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological lation of neurons [1], which is manifested in the form of
disorders affecting a significant portion of the world’s popula- sensory disturbances, convulsions, and may lead to loss of
tion and approximately 2.5 million people in the United States. conscience.
Important biomedical research effort is focused on the devel-
opment of energy efficient devices for the real-time detection There are multiple lines of treatment for epilepsy. Anti-
of seizures. In this paper, we propose an Internet of Medical convulsant drugs are used as a first line to control seizures,
Things (IoMT)-based automated seizure detection system which but a significant portion (more than 30%) of patients remain
will detect a seizure from electroencephalography (EEG) sig- refractory to medication. For patients who are refractory,
nals using a voltage level detector (VLD) and a signal rejection uncontrolled seizures have a potentially devastating effect on
algorithm (SRA). The proposed system analyzes neural signals
continuously and extracts the hyper-synchronous pulses for the the patient’s quality of life. Epilepsy surgery is suitable for
detection of seizure onset. Within a time frame, if the number of some patients with medically refractory seizures, but not if
pulses exceeds a predefined threshold value, a seizure is declared. the patient has multi-focal seizures or if the seizure onset
The SRA reduces false detections, which in turn enhances the area is located in the eloquent cortex [2]. Other possibil-
accuracy of the seizure detector. The design was validated using ities include modification of diet, which may be effective
system-level simulations and consumer electronics proof of con-
cept. The proposed seizure detector reports a sensitivity of 96.9% in some children. Wearable and implantable devices consti-
and specificity of 97.5%. The use of minimal circuitry can lead to tute an important fourth line of treatment, and one whose
reduction of power consumption compared to many contempo- use is growing. Automated, closed loop therapy has shown
rary approaches. The proposed approach can be generalized to efficacy in managing epilepsy. Responsive neural stimulation
other sensor modalities and the use of wearable or implantable (RNS), for example, which is approved by the Food and
solutions, or a combination of the two.
Drug Administration (FDA) for use in the USA, has been
Index Terms—Smart healthcare, IoMT, wearables, epilepsy, shown to reduce the number of seizures experienced by a
seizure, electroencephalography, automated detection, energy patient. Automated seizure detection systems are a growing
efficient systems, low latency systems.
need for the treatment of epilepsy, as early warning can enable
a patient to take protective action, or enable drug delivery or
neurostimulation when necessary [3], [4].
I. I NTRODUCTION There are several ways to diagnose epilepsy by clinical
MART health care is becoming dominant due to the com- examinations. However, the diagnosis can be best performed
S bined pressures of an increasing and aging population, an
increasing demand for excellent care and limited resources.
by electroencephalography (EEG) due to its high temporal
resolution [5], [6]. The EEG can be collected in a number
Smart health achieved through wearables has been focused on of manners, including through the use of a cap, headband,
general wellness, but is now starting to encompass the man- and invasive or subcutaneous sensors. Also possible is the use
agement of acute disorders. One example of such an effort is of other wearable sensors monitoring galvanic skin response
the use of smart health care for the automated real-time con- and heart rate to detect changes within the autonomic ner-
trol of seizures. Epilepsy is a neurological disorder marked by vous system, which is reflective of seizure onset. Manual
spontaneous recurrent seizures. A seizure is the occurrence seizure detection is a tedious and time consuming task, which
of an abnormal hyper-synchronous disturbance of a popu- suggests a need for the development of automated seizure
detection systems which can detect seizures efficiently. In
Manuscript received February 27, 2019; revised April 28, 2019 and May this paper we propose such an automated seizure detection
22, 2019; accepted May 23, 2019. Date of publication May 30, 2019; date of system in the IoMT framework. The proposed seizure detec-
current version July 24, 2019. The work of H. Zaveri was supported in part
by the National Science Foundation and in part by the Swebilius Foundation. tor has reduced design complexity, low sensitivity to noise
(Corresponding author: Saraju P. Mohanty.) and simulation results indicate that it can be implemented
M. A. Sayeed and S. P. Mohanty are with the Department of Computer as a low-power system. Neural activity is monitored continu-
Science and Engineering, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76201 USA
(e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]). ously. The input signal is analyzed by a detection circuit and
E. Kougianos is with the Department of Engineering Technology, University potential seizure activity (hyper-synchronization) is detected.
of North Texas, Denton, TX 76201 USA (e-mail: [email protected]). Hyper-synchronous pulses are processed by a different algo-
H. P. Zaveri is with the Department of Neurology, Yale University,
New Haven, CT 06520 USA (e-mail: [email protected]). rithm. A seizure is declared if the pulses exceed a certain
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TCE.2019.2920068 threshold. The proposed seizure detector consists of a filter,
1558-4127 c 2019 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.
See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
Authorized licensed use limited to: SIDDAGANGA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. Downloaded on November 28,2023 at 05:31:25 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
380 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, VOL. 65, NO. 3, AUGUST 2019
TABLE I
E XISTING C ONSUMER E LECTRONICS W ORKS ON S MART H EALTHCARE
Authorized licensed use limited to: SIDDAGANGA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. Downloaded on November 28,2023 at 05:31:25 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
SAYEED et al.: eSeiz: EDGE-DEVICE FOR ACCURATE SEIZURE DETECTION FOR SMART HEALTHCARE 381
Authorized licensed use limited to: SIDDAGANGA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. Downloaded on November 28,2023 at 05:31:25 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
382 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, VOL. 65, NO. 3, AUGUST 2019
where V(n) is the EEG sample at time sample n and i = Fig. 6. Hyper-synchronous Signal Detection Circuit.
1, 2, 3, . . . , N, with N being the threshold number of samples.
B. Signal Rejection Algorithm (SRA): Detection of Seizure
Onset From Hypersynchronous Signals
A. Hyper-Synchronous Signal Detection Circuit
The hyper-synchronous signals from the VLD are ana-
The proposed circuit in Fig. 6 consists of a band pass fil-
lyzed and spurious pulses are eliminated using the SRA. The
ter, an amplifier, and a voltage level detector (VLD). The
elimination of unwanted signals is performed by:
filter eliminates the unwanted signals and noise associated
with the scalp-EEG signals and only keeps signals of the 0, V(n − 2) = 0 or V(n − 1) = 0
VSE1 (n) = (3)
desired frequency range. The low amplitude neural signals V(n), otherwise.
need to be amplified prior to analysis. This is achieved by the
Spurious pulses are further eliminated using:
amplification unit. The VLD analyzes the amplified signals
and detects hyper-synchronous pulses. The threshold values 0, V(n − 1) = 0 and V(n) = 1
(Vmax , Vmin ) of the VLD are determined from the analysis of VSE2 (n) = (4)
V(n), otherwise.
known seizures. The detection of the hyper-synchronous signal
is based on the following equation [19], [29]: The seizure onset is defined by [19], [29]:
⎧
⎨ Seizure, V(n − 2) = 1 and V(n − 1) = 1,
1, for Vmax > Vmod (n) > Vmin VSE (n) = if V(n) = 1 or 0
Vvld (n) = (2) ⎩
(5)
0, otherwise. 0, otherwise.
Authorized licensed use limited to: SIDDAGANGA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. Downloaded on November 28,2023 at 05:31:25 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
SAYEED et al.: eSeiz: EDGE-DEVICE FOR ACCURATE SEIZURE DETECTION FOR SMART HEALTHCARE 383
TABLE II
S IGNAL R EJECTION A LGORITHM (SRA) T ECHNIQUE
obtained from the VLD is input to the SRA unit. In the first
iteration of signal rejection, if a sample is either ‘0’ or ‘1’ and
the previous two samples are ‘0’, the algorithm outputs a 0. In
the next iteration, if the previous sample is ‘0’, the algorithm
outputs a ‘0’. For seizure onset at the (n − k)th iteration, if the
previous sample is ‘1’, the algorithm results a ‘1’. In the n-th
stage, the algorithm defines a seizure onset if the number of
hyper-synchronous pulses, which is denoted by ‘1’, exceeds
the threshold value. The optimal value of threshold, n and k
can be achieved by heuristic analysis of the known seizure
and non-seizure instances. The SRA technique is illustrated
Fig. 7. Design flow of the proposed eSeiz detector. in Table II, where the signals have been analyzed for seizure
onset and non-seizure onset instances.
Power estimation is generally performed using two
Neural signals are continuously monitored and seizure is approaches: pattern-dependent and pattern-independent. The
detected from the hyper-synchronous pulses (Vvld ). Within power consumption of the proposed system was computed
a time frame, the unwanted pulses are eliminated if their using the pattern-independent approach [31]. Different EEG
amplitude is lower than the threshold value. A seizure onset signals of identical size are applied to the design and the
is declared when the SRA completes the n-th iteration. If average of the computed power defines the power dissipation.
the number of hyper-synchronous pulses is greater than the The proposed seizure detector is viewed as a black box and
threshold number, a seizure is declared according to equa- current and voltage values are obtained from current and volt-
tions (3), (4), and (5). age sensors available in the system level simulator libraries.
A hardware-in-the-loop simulation approach was followed for
VI. C ONSUMER E LECTRONICS (CE) P ROOF OF the CE prototyping of the proposed system. A vendor-provided
C ONCEPT OF THE P ROPOSED E S EIZ hardware support package was used in the system level simu-
The EEG signal is initially preprocessed and filtered. lator and the proposed model was run on the actual board.
The low amplitude neural signal is then amplified using an EEG data and seizure information are continuously stored
adjustable gain amplifier. The maximum and minimum volt- on the eSeiz channel in the open IoT cloud. A liquid crys-
ages of the VLD define the hyper-synchronous signal. Using tal display (LCD), which is attached to the board, displays
the proposed SRA, the seizure onset is identified when it information about seizure state. If any seizure occurs, a noti-
occurs. The design flow of the proposed seizure detector is fication is sent to the designated user through the cloud. The
shown in Fig. 7. System-level prototyping of the proposed EEG data and seizure state are sent to the cloud. The proposed
eSeiz was performed as a first step towards CE prototyping. system consists of two channels: the eSeiz channel and the
The system level model of the proposed system is shown in EEG channel. The information on seizure state is stored in
Fig. 8. EEG signals are fed into the system. A band pass fil- the eSeiz channel whereas continuous EEG data are saved in
ter eliminates unwanted noise and extracts all seizure onset the EEG channel. Both patient and medical professionals have
information. The adjustable gain amplifier enables signals to access to the IoT cloud as well as the database using a REST
be amplified to the desired level. Hyper-synchronous signals API [24]. Fig. 9 shows the CE prototype of the proposed eSeiz.
are detected by the VLD. If the voltage is within the range, It should be pointed out that this prototype serves simply as
the function outputs a 1, otherwise it is zero. a proof-of-concept production. It is not optimized and con-
The maximum and minimum voltages of the VLD are deter- sumes substantially more power than a final product would.
mined by heuristic analysis of the amplified signal. For a For these reasons, in this discussion we examined the power
subject with an even number of seizures n, the Vmax and consumption from a simulation point of view since this will
Vmin values are computed from n/2 seizure instances. If n be much closer to an optimized, consumer-ready device.
is odd, the Vmax and Vmin values are obtained from (n − 1)/2
seizure instances. The average optimal values are adjusted by VII. E XPERIMENTAL R ESULTS
trial and error and are then applied to unknown seizure and The continuous and long term EEG recordings are taken
non-seizure instances. The hyper-synchronous signal which is from the CHB-MIT scalp EEG database [25], [32], which
Authorized licensed use limited to: SIDDAGANGA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. Downloaded on November 28,2023 at 05:31:25 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
384 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, VOL. 65, NO. 3, AUGUST 2019
Fig. 8. System-Level Simulator Model of (a) Proposed Seizure Detector. (b) Pattern-Independent Power Measurement Setup.
Authorized licensed use limited to: SIDDAGANGA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. Downloaded on November 28,2023 at 05:31:25 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
SAYEED et al.: eSeiz: EDGE-DEVICE FOR ACCURATE SEIZURE DETECTION FOR SMART HEALTHCARE 385
Fig. 10. Transient analysis (a) Input EEG signal of 2800-3200 seconds (b) EEG signal of 2975-3050 seconds (c,e) Zoom 2985-3005 seconds of input signal
(d) Output of VLD at 2985-3005 seconds (f) Output of SRA after 1st iteration (g) SRA output after the 2nd iteration (h) Zoom 2993-3003 seconds of input
signal (i) SRA output after the (n − k)-th iteration (j) SRA output after the n-th iteration.
TABLE III
C OMPARISON TO E XISTING S YSTEMS
depicted in Fig. 10(d). The SRA eliminates the unwanted sig- Fig. 10(i) shows the initiation of seizure detection after the
nals with every iteration. Fig. 10(f) and 10(g) are the output (n − k)-th iteration, which reports a smaller number of pulses.
of the SRA after the first and second iterations, respectively. After the n-th iteration, the SRA eliminates all spurious pulses
Authorized licensed use limited to: SIDDAGANGA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. Downloaded on November 28,2023 at 05:31:25 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
386 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, VOL. 65, NO. 3, AUGUST 2019
R EFERENCES
[1] F. Mormann, R. G. Andrzejak, C. E. Elger, and K. Lehnertz, “Seizure
prediction: The long and winding road,” Brain, vol. 130, no. 2,
pp. 314–333, Feb. 2007.
[2] S. Spencer and L. Huh, “Outcomes of epilepsy surgery in adults and
children,” Lancet Neurol., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 525–537, 2008.
[3] I. Osorio, H. P. Zaveri, M. G. Frei, and S. Arthurs, Epilepsy: The
Intersection of Neurosciences, Biology, Mathematics, Engineering, and
Physics. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2011.
[4] B. J. Gluckman and C. Schevon, “Seizure Prediction 6: From mecha-
nisms to engineered interventions for epilepsy,” J. Clin. Neurophysiol.,
Fig. 11. Transient analysis (a) Input EEG signal of 290-310 seconds vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 181–187, Feb. 2015.
(b) Output of VLD at 290-310 seconds (c) Zoom 295-305 seconds of input [5] L. S. Vidyaratne and K. M. Iftekharuddin, “Real-time epileptic seizure
signal (d) SRA output after the (n − k)-th iteration (e) SRA output after the detection using EEG,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 25,
n-th iteration. no. 11, pp. 2146–2156, Nov. 2017.
[6] R. G. Andrzejak, K. Schindler, and C. Rummel, “Nonrandomness,
TABLE IV nonlinear dependence, and nonstationarity of electroencephalographic
C HARACTERIZATION OF THE S EIZURE D ETECTOR recordings from epilepsy patients,” Phys. Rev. E, Stat. Phys. Plasmas
Fluids Relat. Interdiscip. Top., vol. 86, Oct. 2012, Art. no. 046206.
[7] K. Ullah, M. A. Shah, and S. Zhang, “Effective ways to use Internet of
Things in the field of medical and smart health care,” in Proc. Int. Conf.
Intell. Syst. Eng. (ICISE), Islamabad, Pakistan, 2016, pp. 372–379.
[8] N. Dey, A. S. Ashour, F. Shi, S. J. Fong, and R. S. Sherratt, “Developing
residential wireless sensor networks for ECG healthcare monitoring,”
IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron., vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 442–449, Nov. 2017.
[9] S. Ivanov, D. Botvich, and S. Balasubramaniam, “Cooperative wire-
less sensor environments supporting body area networks,” IEEE Trans.
Consum. Electron., vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 284–292, May 2012.
[10] S. Spinsante and E. Gambi, “Remote health monitoring by OSGi tech-
nology and digital TV integration,” IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron.,
vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 1434–1441, Nov. 2012.
[11] S. Raj and K. C. Ray, “A personalized point-of-care platform for real-
time ECG monitoring,” IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron., vol. 64, no. 4,
and declares a seizure. The seizure for subject 11 (chb11) is pp. 452–460, Nov. 2018.
shown in Fig. 11. Fig. 11(a) shows the EEG epoch for 290- [12] P. Sundaravadivel, E. Kougianos, S. P. Mohanty, and M. Ganapathiraju,
“Everything you wanted to know about smart healthcare,” IEEE Consum.
310 sec. The seizure instance originates at 298 sec and ends at Electron. Mag., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 18–28, Jan. 2018.
320 sec. The outputs of the VLD and SRA (after the (n − k)- [13] E. Dolgin. (Feb. 2018). This Seizure-Detecting Smartwatch Could Save
th iteration) are shown in Fig. 11(b), and 11(d), respectively. Your Life. [Online]. Available: https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-human-
os/biomedical/diagnostics/this-seizuredetecting-smartwatch-could-save-
Finally, the resulting signal after the n-th SRA iteration as well your-life
as the detection of seizure is presented in Fig. 11(e). Overall, [14] S.-Y. Lee, P.-W. Huang, M.-C. Liang, J.-H. Hong, and J.-Y. Chen,
the detector missed one seizure instance for the chosen EEG “Development of an arrhythmia monitoring system and human study,”
dataset. The sensitivity, and specificity of the seizure detector IEEE Tran. Consum. Electron., vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 442–451, Nov. 2018.
[15] A. Shoeb, H. Edwards, J. Connolly, B. Bourgeois, S. T. Treves, and
were 96.9%, and 97.5%, respectively. The average latency of J. Guttag, “Patient-specific seizure onset detection,” Epilepsy Behav.,
the proposed system is found to be 3.6 seconds. A comparison vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 483–498, Aug. 2004.
Authorized licensed use limited to: SIDDAGANGA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. Downloaded on November 28,2023 at 05:31:25 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
SAYEED et al.: eSeiz: EDGE-DEVICE FOR ACCURATE SEIZURE DETECTION FOR SMART HEALTHCARE 387
[16] F. Mormann, K. Lehnertz, P. David, and C. E. Elger, “Mean phase coher- Md. Abu Sayeed (S’18) received the bache-
ence as a measure for phase synchronization and its application to the lor’s degree in electrical and electronic engineering
EEG of epilepsy patients,” Phys. D Nonlin. Phenom., vol. 144, nos. 3–4, from the Khulna University of Engineering and
pp. 358–369, Oct. 2000. Technology, Bangladesh, in 2009 and the mas-
[17] S. Raghunathan, S. K. Gupta, M. P. Ward, R. M. Worth, K. Roy, and ter’s degree in electrical engineering from Lamar
P. P. Irazoqui, “The design and hardware implementation of a low-power University, Beaumont, TX, USA, in 2015. He is cur-
real-time seizure detection algorithm,” J. Neural Eng., vol. 6, no. 5, rently pursuing the Ph.D. degree in computer science
Oct. 2009, Art. no. 056005. and engineering with the University of North Texas.
[18] N. C. Bhavaraju, M. G. Frei, and I. Osorio, “Analog seizure detection His research interests include biomedical signal pro-
and performance evaluation,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 53, no. 2, cessing for smart healthcare, machine learning, and
pp. 238–245, Feb. 2006. low-power very large-scale integration.
[19] M. T. Salam, M. Sawan, and D. K. Nguyen, “A novel low-power-
implantable epileptic seizure-onset detector,” IEEE Trans. Biomed.
Circuits Syst., vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 568–578, Dec. 2011.
Saraju P. Mohanty (SM’08) received the bach-
[20] N. Verma, A. Shoeb, J. Bohorquez, J. Dawson, J. Guttag, and
elor’s degree (Hons.) in electrical engineering
A. P. Chandrakasan, “A micro-power EEG acquisition SoC with inte-
from the Orissa University of Agriculture and
grated feature extraction processor for a chronic seizure detection
Technology, Bhubaneswar, 1995, the master’s degree
system,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 804–816,
in systems science and automation from the Indian
Apr. 2010.
Institute of Science, Bengaluru, in 1999, and the
[21] K. Patel, C.-P. Chua, S. Faul, and C. J. Bleakley, “Low power real-time
Ph.D. degree in computer science and engineering
seizure detection for ambulatory EEG,” in Proc. Int. Conf. PCTHealth
from the University of South Florida, Tampa, in
Pervasive Health, London, U.K., Apr. 2009, pp. 1–7.
2003.
[22] X. Zhang, H. Jiang, L. Zhang, C. Zhang, Z. Wang, and X. Chen,
He is a Professor with the University of North
“An energy-efficient ASIC for wireless body sensor networks in med-
Texas. His research is in “Smart Electronic Systems”
ical applications,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst., vol. 4, no. 1,
which has been funded by National Science Foundations, Semiconductor
pp. 11–18, Feb. 2010.
Research Corporation, U.S. Air Force, IUSSTF, and Mission Innovation. He
[23] M. E. Saab and J. Gotman, “A system to detect the onset of epilep-
has authored 300 research articles, 4 books, and invented 4 U.S. patents. His
tic seizures in scalp EEG,” Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 116, no. 2,
Google Scholar H-index is 31 and i10-index is 104. He was a recipient of
pp. 427–442, 2005.
the six best paper awards, the IEEE-CS-TCVLSI Distinguished Leadership
[24] M. A. Sayeed, S. P. Mohanty, E. Kougianos, V. P. Yanambakha, and
Award in 2018 for services to the IEEE, and to the VLSI research commu-
H. Zaveri, “A robust and fast seizure detector for IoT edge,” in Proc.
nity, and the 2016 PROSE Award for Best Textbook in Physical Sciences and
IEEE Int. Conf. Smart Electron. Syst. (iSES), Hyderabad, India, 2018,
Mathematics category from the Association of American Publishers for his
pp. 156–160.
Mixed-Signal System Design book published by McGraw-Hill in 2015. He
[25] A. Shoeb and J. Guttag, “Application of machine learning to epileptic
has delivered multiple keynote talks at various international conferences. He
seizure detection,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., Haifa, Israel, 2010,
is the Editor-in-Chief of the IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine. He served
pp. 975–982.
as the Chair of Technical Committee on VLSI, IEEE Computer Society from
[26] S. Kusmakar, C. K. Karmakar, B. Yan, T. J. O’Brien,
2014 to 2018.
R. Muthuganapathy, and M. Palaniswami, “Automated detection
of convulsive seizures using a wearable accelerometer device,” IEEE
Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 421–432, Feb. 2019.
[27] M. Fan and C.-A. Chou, “Detecting abnormal pattern of epileptic Elias Kougianos (SM’07) received the B.S.E.E.
seizures via temporal synchronization of EEG signals,” IEEE Trans. degree from the University of Patras, Greece, in
Biomed. Eng., vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 601–608, Mar. 2019. 1985 and the M.S.E.E. degree, the M.S. degree
[28] T. Zhang and W. Chen, “LMD based features for the automatic seizure in physics, and the Ph.D. degree in EE from
detection of EEG signals using SVM,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Lousiana State University in 1987, 1988, and 1997,
Eng., vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1100–1108, Aug. 2017. respectively.
[29] M. A. Sayeed, S. P. Mohanty, E. Kougianos, and H. Zaveri, “An energy He is a Professor with the Department of
efficient epileptic seizure detector,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Consum. Engineering Technology, University of North Texas
Electron. (ICCE), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2018, pp. 1–4. (UNT), Denton, TX, USA. From 1988 to 1997,
[30] M. A. Sayeed, S. P. Mohanty, E. Kougianos, and H. Zaveri, “A fast and he was with Texas Instruments, Inc., Houston
accurate approach for real-time seizure detection in the IoMT,” in Proc. and Dallas, TX, USA. In 1997, he joined Avant!
IEEE Int. Conf. Smart Cities (ISC2), Kansas City, MO, USA, 2018, Corporation (currently, Synopsys), Phoenix, AZ, USA, as a Senior
pp. 1–5. Applications Engineer. In 2001, he joined Cadence Design Systems, Inc.,
[31] U. Albalawi, S. P. Mohanty, and E. Kougianos, “Energy-efficient Dallas, TX, USA, as a Senior Architect in Analog/Mixed-Signal Custom
design of the secure better portable graphics compression architec- IC design. He has been with UNT since 2004. He has authored over 120
ture for trusted image communication in the IoT,” in Proc. IEEE peer-reviewed journal and conference publications. His research interests are
Comput. Soc. Annu. Symp. VLSI (ISVLSI), Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2016, in the area of analog/mixed-signal/RF IC design and simulation and in the
pp. 302–307. development of VLSI architectures for multimedia applications.
[32] A. L. Goldberger, “PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet:
Components of a new research resource for complex physi-
ologic signals,” Circulation, vol. 101, no. 23, pp. e215–e220,
Hitten P. Zaveri (M’10) received the B.S.E.
Jun. 2000.
and M.S.E. degrees in electrical engineering, the
[33] J. Yoo, L. Yan, D. El-Damak, M. A. B. Altaf, A. H. Shoeb,
B.S.E. degree in computer engineering, and the
and A. P. Chandrakasan, “An 8-channel scalable EEG acquisition
M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in bioengineering from the
SoC with patient-specific seizure classification and recording pro-
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. He was a Post-
cessor,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 214–228,
Doctoral Fellow in epilepsy and neurology at Yale
Jan. 2013.
University, where he is currently the Director of
[34] M. A. B. Altaf, C. Zhang, and J. Yoo, “A 16-channel patient-specific
the Computational Neurophysiology Laboratory. His
seizure onset and termination detection SoC with impedance-adaptive
research interests lie at the intersection of neuro-
transcranial electrical stimulator,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 50,
science, engineering, and mathematics.
no. 11, pp. 2728–2740, Nov. 2015.
Authorized licensed use limited to: SIDDAGANGA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. Downloaded on November 28,2023 at 05:31:25 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.