Appendix A

The QCE of the NBC No. 461

An instrument for Instruction/Teaching Effectiveness

Rating Period: 2022 to 2023

Name of Faculty MARITESS CARREON Academic Rank: Associate Professor V
Evaluator:
O Self O Peer
O Student O Supervisor
Instruction: Please evaluate the faculty using the scale below. Encircle your rating.
Scale Descriptive Rating Qualitative Description

5 Outstanding The performance almost always exceeds the job requirements. The Faculty is an exceptional role model
4 Very Satisfactory The performance meets and often exceeds the job requirements

3 Satisfactory The performance meets job requirements

2 Fair The performance needs some development to meet job requirements.

1 Poor The faculty fails to meet job requirements

A. Commitment (20%) Scal

e
1. Demonstrates sensitivity to students’ ability to attend and absorb content information. 5 4 3 2 1
2. Integrates sensitively his/her learning objectives with those of the students in a collaborative process. 5 4 3 2 1
3. Makes self available to students beyond official time 5 4 3 2 1
4. Regularly comes to class on time, well-groomed and well-prepared to complete assigned responsibilities. 5 4 3 2 1
5. Keeps accurate records of students’ performance and prompt submission of the same. 5 4 3 2 1
Total Score 15
B. Knowledge of Subject (20%) Scal
e
1. Demonstrates mastery of the subject matter (explain the subject matter without relying solely on the 3
5 4 2 1
prescribed textbook).
2. Draws and share information on the state on the art of theory and practice in his/her discipline. 5 4 3 2 1
3. Integrates subject to practical circumstances and learning intents/purposes of students. 5 4 3 2 1
4. Explains the relevance of present topics to the previous lessons, and relates the subject matter to relevant 3
5 4 2 1
current issues and/or daily life activities.
5. Demonstrates up-to-date knowledge and/or awareness on current trends and issues of the subject. 5 4 3 2 1
Total Score 15
C. Teaching for Independent Learning (30%) Scal
e
1. Creates teaching strategies that allow students to practice using concepts they need to understand
5 4 2 1
(interactive discussion).
2. Enhances student self-esteem and/or gives due recognition to students’ performance/potentials. 5 4 3 2 1
3. Allows students to create their own course with objectives and realistically defined student-professor rules 3
5 4 2 1
and make them accountable for their performance
4. Allows students to think independently and make their own decisions and holding them accountable for their 3
5 4 2 1
performance based largely on their success in executing decisions.
5. Encourages students to learn beyond what is required and help/guide the students how to apply the concepts 3
5 4 2 1
learned
Total Score 15
D. Management of Learning (30%) Scal
e
1. Creates opportunities for intensive and/or extensive contribution of students in the class activities (e.g. breaks
5 4 2 1
class into dyads, triads or buzz/task groups).
2. Assumes roles as facilitator, resource person, coach, inquisitor, integrator, referee in drawing students to 3
5 4 2 1
contribute to knowledge and understanding of the concepts at hands.
3. Designs and implements learning conditions and experience that promotes healthy exchange and/or 3
5 4 2 1
confrontations.
4. Structures/re-structures learning and teaching–learning context to enhance attainment of collective learning 3
5 4 2 1
objectives.
5. Use of Instructional Materials ((audio/video materials: fieldtrips, film showing, computer aided instruction and 3
5 4 2 1
etc.) to reinforces learning processes.
Total Score 15
Legend for the
Formula/Equation:

ts = 60
hps = Highest Possible
Score
% = Percentage

Signature of Evaluator:

Name of Evaluator: VIRGINIA H.

PUDA

Position of Evaluator: STUDENT

Date: DECEMBER 23,2022