ACT 1 C Collection
ACT 1 C Collection
RESEARCH GAP
There are studies that cover incorporating eco-friendly materials to the production of bricks and the
potential use of oyster shells in concretes. However, there is an experimentation gap regarding the use of
oyster shells or other seashell species as the eco-friendly material for making eco-friendly bricks.
Trista Suzzane G. Cagalitan GROUP 2 - Engineering
RESEARCH GAP
Even though the studies emphasize the advantages of including seashells in concrete mixtures as a
sustainable recycling technique, there is an underlying gap regarding the precise elements that
contribute to the differences in strength and freeze-thaw durability between factory seashell waste and
kitchen seashell waste when added to concrete.
Rjan Michael G. Sesbreño GROUP 2 – Engineering
Utilization Bunyamin -Oyster shell -Oyster shell ash was Indonesia -Concrete
of oyster Bunyamin, ash content sieved to appropriate with a 5%
shells as a Amir (cement sizes for use as a cement
substitute Mukhlis replacement cement replacement replacement
part of level) (#200 sieve) and fine level using
cement and -Water-cement aggregate (2.36 mm oyster shell
fine ratio (w/c) sieve). Different ash exhibited
aggregate in -Compressive water-cement ratios higher
the strength of (w/c) were selected compressive
compressive concrete for the study, strength
strength of including 0.4, 0.5, and compared to
concrete 0.6. concrete
using
-The concrete traditional
mixtures were cement alone.
prepared by
incorporating oyster -However, for
shell ash as a partial other
cement replacement replacement
and fine aggregate in levels that are
various proportions, higher than
while maintaining 5%, the
different w/c ratios. compressive
The mixtures were strengths of
thoroughly blended to the concrete
create concrete specimens
specimens. were lower
than those of
-Compressive strength the control
tests were conducted specimens.
on the concrete
specimens with
different levels of
oyster shell ash and
w/c ratios. The results
were compared to
control specimens
using only traditional
cement
Research Gap:
While both studies explore the use of alternative materials in concrete production (seashell ash in the
first study and oyster shell ash in the second study), there is a research gap in terms of the comparing
both alternative materials. Specifically, no direct comparison has been made between the performance
of seashell ash and oyster shell ash as partial replacements for traditional cement. Such a comparative
study could provide valuable insights into the potential advantages and limitations of these two waste-
derived materials in terms of improving concrete properties, especially in different locations such as
Malaysia and Indonesia.
Ariel John A. Albances GROUP 2 – Engineering
RESEARCH GAP:
Both studies use seashell waste ash as cement. However, there is a research gap in both studies that
needs further study on the long-term performance of utilizing seashell waste in cement.
Fredinel Michael G. Aguro GROUP 2 – Engineering
RESEARCH GAP
Both studies need further investigation into the increased use of percentage seashell ash that affects the
brick properties.