Refusal To Comply With Unlawful Order To Show Financial Information
Refusal To Comply With Unlawful Order To Show Financial Information
2 Your address
[City, ST ZIP Code]
3
5
[Court name]
10
vs. NOTICE TO COURT
REFUSAL TO COMPLY DEMAND FOR PERSONAL
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
11 [Defendant's Name] ,
12
Defendant
13
NOTICE TO COURT
14
15
REFUSAL TO COMPLY DEMAND FOR PERSONAL
16 FINANCIAL INFORMATION
17
Comes now, a Notice to the court by the Defendant/Father [type in
18
19 your name and remove brackets] is refusing to comply with the court’s unlawful
20
demand for financial evidence is lawful and is protected by the 4th amendment.
21
22
IT IS A CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENT THAT THE
23
25
INJURY IN FACT CAUSED BY THE DEFENDANT/FATHER TO HAVE
26
NOTICE TO COURT
-1
1 STANDING AND MEET THE BURDEN OF PROOF OR THE COURT
2
MUST IMMEDIATELY DISMISS THIS MATTER
3
7
of proof to introduce evidence of showing an injury in fact caused by the
8 Defendant/Father.
9
2. The Defendant/Father does not have to introduce evidence to prove claims
10
11 made by the petitioner, when it is the petitioner’s burden of proof to meet the
12
constitutional minimum of standing for the matter to be "redressed by a
13
favorable decision.1"
14
21 1
“Third, it must be "likely," as opposed to merely "speculative," that the injury will be "redressed
by a favorable decision."” Id., at 38, 43 Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 US 555 - Supreme Court 1992
2
22 “Over the years, our cases have established that the irreducible constitutional minimum of
standing contains three elements. First, the plaintiff must have suffered an "injury in fact"—an invasion of a
23 legally protected interest which is (a) concrete and particularized, see id., at 756; Warth v. Seldin, 422 U. S. 490,
508 (1975); Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U. S. 727, 740-741, n. 16 (1972);[1] and (b) "actual or imminent, not
24 `conjectural' or `hypothetical,' " Whitmore, supra, at 155 (quoting Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U. S. 95, 102 (1983)).
Second, there must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of—the injury has to
25 be "fairly. . . trace[able] to the challenged action of the defendant, and not . . . th[e] result [of] the independent
action of some third party not before the court." Simon v. Eastern Ky. Welfare Rights Organization, 426 U. S. 26,
41-42 (1976). Third, it must be "likely," as opposed to merely "speculative," that the injury will be "redressed by
26
a favorable decision." Id., at 38, 43 Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 US 555 - Supreme Court 1992
NOTICE TO COURT
-2
1 4. Without proof of evidence showing an injury in fact, then the petitioner has
2
failed to state a claim and thereby the matter must be dismissed with
3
7
amendment that protects the undersigned from giving evidence against
8 himself.
9
10
11
12
13
14
Dated this [day] of [Month], [year].
15
16
Your Nmae
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
NOTICE TO COURT
-3