Adv Polym Technol - 2012 - Matysiak - Analysis and Optimization of The Silicone Molding Process Based On Numerical
Adv Polym Technol - 2012 - Matysiak - Analysis and Optimization of The Silicone Molding Process Based On Numerical
XAVIER KORNMANN
ABB Corporate Research, Segelhof 1, CH-5405 Baden-Daettwil, Switzerland
optimize the process for a selected product, avoiding trial and error methods with
the only cost connected to the computational time. An accurate representation of
the process required a mathematical approach, among others, consisting of
viscosity, pVT, and curing kinetics models that were built up based on rheological,
pressure, and calorimetric measurements conducted for a considered silicone
material. C 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Adv Polym Techn 32: E258–E273, 2013;
μ = exp(a 1 + a 2 ln γ + a 3 ln(T)2 )
∂(ρα)/∂t + ∇(ρwα) = Sa
where γ stands for the shear rate, T is temperature;
a 1 , a 2 , and a 3 are the model parameters characteristic where ρ is the fluid density, w is the vector of velocity,
for the given material and determined experimen- and Sa is the source term corresponding to the curing
tally. rate dα/dt.
RHEOLOGICAL EXPERIMENTS
CALORIMETRIC EXPERIMENTS
Viscosity measurements were done for a chosen
silicone material at several temperatures and shear The measurements of curing kinetics were con-
rates. This enables one to find the relationship de- ducted by using DSC, which is commonly used for
scribing the influence of the shear rate and tempera- the thermal investigation of a broad range of mate-
ture on the silicone viscosity. The experimental stand rials, including thermosetting silicones. One of the
DSC applications is curing kinetic analysis that can from the ones elaborated on the basis of isothermal
be done either by using a dynamic or isothermal DSC. A deeper study of these results revealed that
method. In dynamic DSC, the sample is usually the correlation between the experimental data (solid
heated starting from ambient conditions with dif- lines in Fig. 6) and the data predicted by the cur-
ferent heating rates, for example, 2, 5, or 10 K/min. ing kinetic models (dotted lines in Fig. 6) was better
In turn, in isothermal DSC several experimental runs for dynamic measurements. In addition to that, the
are performed and the sample temperature is kept dynamic measurements tend to be closer to the re-
constant at different levels (e.g., 100, 120, or 140◦ C) ality, because the material is heated up likewise in
during each such run.9 In both DSC methods, the the production process. All this led to the conclusion
heat flow into or from a sample is recorded as de- that the results of dynamic measurements are valid
picted in Fig. 5. ones.
The results of dynamic and isothermal calorimet-
ric measurements performed for a selected silicone
PRESSURE EXPERIMENTS
are presented in Fig. 6. Generally, it can be concluded
that the course of the curing reaction is strongly de- The mentioned pVT model was developed on the
pendent on the heating rate and temperature. The basis of pressure measurements performed for a sil-
coefficients of the curing kinetics model were calcu- icone sample closed in a tight steel mold. The mold
lated by using nonlinear regression separately based was placed in a laboratory oven as illustrated in
on dynamic and on isothermal runs. Their values Fig. 7 and heated up to force the thermal expansion
are gathered in Table II. One can notice that the cur- of silicone. Expanding silicone raised the pressure
ing kinetics model and the total heat of the reaction inside the mold, which was recorded by the assem-
obtained by using dynamic DSC data are different bled pressure sensor.
Process Optimization in
Computer Simulations
modeling in ANSYS Fluent for an exemplary prod- and to accelerate in this way the numerical compu-
uct manufactured by using silicone injection mold- tations. The hybrid numerical mesh (illustrated in
ing technology. The considered topics were number Fig. 10) was applied during the geometry discretiza-
and location of injection and ventilation channels, tion into the finite number of elements. In total, it
temperature of injected silicone, temperature of in- consisted of ∼1.4 million tetrahedral and hexahe-
ternal product parts prior to injection, temperature dral elements. For the sake of simplicity, all required
of mold during filling and curing stage, and finally material properties (except the silicone viscosity cal-
injection time. culated according to the mentioned viscous model)
were assumed to be constant as presented in Table V.
PRODUCT UNDER INVESTIGATION
A simplified hollow-core insulator enclosed in a
SIMULATION RESULTS
steel mold was selected as a subject of optimization.
The geometrical model of the product is presented The starting point for the optimization was the
in Fig. 9. One can notice that the product symmetry results obtained for the basic process configuration,
enables one to consider only half of the geometry that is, Case 01. It can be observed in Fig. 11 that the
130
130
130
130
130
140
during Injection Stage
Mold Temperature
100
80
80
80
80
80 FIGURE 10. Numerical mesh applied in computer
simulations.
Injected Silicone
Temperature of
104.16
104.16
34.38
34.38
34.38
34.38
Case 01
Case 02
Case 03
Case 04
Case 05
Case 06
Process
TABLE V
Material Properties Defined in the Computer Simulations
Material Density (kg/m3 ) Heat Capacity (J/kgK) Thermal Conductivity (W/mK) Viscosity (Pas)
FIGURE 12. Flow pattern of silicone during the mold filling stage depending on the injection system.
FIGURE 16. Maximum temperature computed in the FIGURE 18. Degree of curing computed at point 7 for
fluid domain for all analyzed cases. different process scenarios.
FIGURE 20. Minimum degree of curing for different FIGURE 21. Maximum degree of curing for different
process scenarios. process scenarios.
tube. This again confirmed the strong correlation be- during the flow that make the process analysis even
tween the curing rate and temperature determined more problematic.
by the process parameters. A similar conclusion can In this connection, an advanced 3D approach for
be drawn on the basis of Fig. 23, which presents dif- numerical modeling of silicone molding was de-
ferent degrees of curing registered for the analyzed veloped, validated, and proposed as a tool for the
scenarios after around 10 min counting from the pro- analysis and optimization of this complex process.
cess start. For example, in Case 06 almost the whole The standard mathematical equations describing the
amount of silicone was cured after around 10 min of multiphase fluid flow and conjugate heat transfer
processing, whereas in Case 01 a significant portion were supplemented with pressure, viscous, and cur-
of the material was still in the liquid state at the same ing kinetic models to reflect the mentioned silicone
moment. properties and simulate the process in a more re-
alistic way. This required three independent experi-
ments, that is, rheological, pressure, and calorimetric
measurements, to capture the unique silicone char-
acteristics and to determine the material-dependent
Summary coefficients present in each of the models listed
above. A high-pressure build-up was observed dur-
This article deals with the silicone molding tech- ing the silicone heating in a closed volume, which
nology widely used on the industrial scale for the confirmed high thermal expansion of the silicone.
production of silicone insulation for electrical appli- The rheological experiment was conducted for dif-
cations. Many parameters affecting the final product ferent temperatures and shear rates, and the results
quality and the process complexity were discussed. revealed a strong correlation between these variables
Among them, the mold temperature, injection pres- and the silicone viscosity. Finally, the calorimetric
sure reflected in the mold filling time, silicone tem- measurements allowed recognition of the kinetics of
perature, inserts temperature or design of injection, the silicone cross-linking reaction and defined the
and ventilation systems can be found. In addition exothermic effect related to this process.
to that, it was pointed out that the silicone material The experimentally developed models were in-
is known for its high thermal expansion, exother- troduced by using the numerical simulations of
mic polymerization, and non-Newtonian behavior the silicone molding process. The goal of the
computations was twofold: analysis and improve- recognition of regions with possible air void for-
ment of the silicone insulation forming process for mation, which is an undesirable effect in the con-
the selected product. For this purpose, a simpli- text of the final product quality and reliability. The
fied hollow core insulator was chosen and a series correction of the ventilation system avoided this
of simulations for different process configurations problem. Apart from that, the threat of material
were performed. These scenarios corresponded to overheating was excluded and the filling time was
the parameters strongly affecting the process course shortened, thanks to the application of additional
that are mentioned above (number and location of injection channels. Moreover, the simulation results
injection and ventilation channels, injection time, showed the possibility of curing stage improvement.
temperature of inserts, silicone, and mold). The re- The introduction of inserts and silicone preheating
sults confirmed that the computer simulations can together with a higher mold heating temperature led
be successfully applied for the investigation and op- to a significant reduction in the time needed to carry
timization of such a complex process like silicone out the silicone polymerization process without the
molding. For example, the simulation data allowed risk of premature gelation of the material.
DOI 10.1002/adv
SILICONE MOLDING PROCESS BASED ON NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS AND EXPERIMENTS
FIGURE 23. Different progress in the curing reaction depending on the process parameters.