DR Tasew Shedaga Proposal Development Guideline
DR Tasew Shedaga Proposal Development Guideline
1.)Cover pages
Cover pages should be based on the guidelines of your institutions
N.B: Write the cover page properly with all relevant information keeping
the layout/ design and
font (size & type)
line spacing
Use ‘Times New Roman’ font type throughout your whole document
Before starting your study please read
at list 20 articles and journals to enhance
understandings of your study variables and
your title
Before submitting your title
please be sure that
you understand it very well.
Your title concepts
It dimensions
The variables under it
The methodology of measuring your
title
Your real respondents of your title
The fit between your title and your
case areas should be clearly understand by
your self
Please Write and develop Your
Preliminary Pages According To The
Formats And Guideline Of Your Institution
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
You must add chapter introduction for all chapters: This is sample for chapter 1: This chapter deals
about background of the study; statement of the problem; objectives of the study; significance of the
study; scope of the study; limitations of the study; operational definition of key terms, and organization
of the study.
Similarly write for the other remaining chapters.(only 2 – 5 lines in your final paper)
Be careful, follow strictly the guide you were given during attached and do your work accordingly.
General Comments on introduction
1. Introduction
1.1. Background of the study: The proposal begins with an introductory statement, which leads like
a funnel from a broad view of your topic to the specific Statement of the Problem. It provides
readers of the proposal the rationale (based on published sources), for doing the study. It is the
part of the proposal that provides readers with the background information for the research
proposal. Its purpose is to establish a framework for the research, so that readers can
understand how it is related to other research.
The background section sets out the direction the researcher intends to take.
a) Introduction to the topic is putting the study into context and broadly touching on some considered
key issues. It may begin by offering a broad context for the study, and quickly come to the point with
a narrow focus definition of the problem.
b) Pick on issues that lead you to the research problem or question by identifying various dimensions in
which problem manifests itself.
c) Place the study within the larger context of existing scholarly literature while reaching out to a
specific audience.
In addition on this section
1. Language, typographical error, margin, spacing between line and spacing between
paragraphs.....1.5, time new Roman and 12 fonts for EACH paragraph MUST BE CONSIDERED
FROM CHAPTER ONE TO FIVE
2. Write a lot about your key variable in detail
3. Compare and contrast ideas and concepts about the variables
4. The introduction part SHOULD show WHY YOU SELCT YOUR TITLE AND the justification of the
study
5. The key variable should be easily identified
6. The key variable should be supported by quantitative and qualitative studies and empirical
evidences in concrete manner
7. The introduction part should show the justification of the study
8. THE STUDY SHOULD observe major prospective of STUDY VARIABLES clearly under your study
that may be around the world
9. Pleas add and support your background of the study by identifying other findings that shows
major challenges in Ethiopia and your case area
10. THE COMPARITION ON STUDY VARIABLES SHUOLD BE shown as evidences
11. PLEASE ADD EXPERIENCES OF YOUR STUDY VARIABLES BY TAKING OTHER COUNTRIES
EXPERIENCES AS A BEST PRACTICES
12. Generally pls make your introduction and background of the study by applying deductive
knowledge approach (from general to specific knowledge development
13. BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY SHOULD BE SUPPORTED BY REFERENCES
14. BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY SHOULD HAVE AT LEAST 2 PLGES
3. General
Comments
Statement
the problem
A research problem refers to a situation whereby there exist observable negative effects of which there is
a knowledge gap. The researcher needs to be focused, and must single out and clearly state the problem.
Is the problem:
a) Amenable to empirical investigation or evaluation through collection and analysis of relevant data.
b) Brief, clear and precise
c) Researchable in respect to appropriate sources of data/information that can provide solutions to the
problems identified
d) Solvable
e) Fitting itself well to established theories or concepts
The following guiding questions could be helpful;
Who is affected and how? What is missing and where? What went wrong and to what extent? What are
the notable effects, where, extent for whom? Is the problem self-expressive or does it generate other
problems?
Statement of the problem: A problem might be defined as the issue that exists in the literature, theory,
or practice that leads to a need for the study. The prospective researcher should think on what caused
the need to do the research (problem identification). The Statement of the Problem describes the heart
of your study in few succinct sentences. It identifies the variables the researcher plans to study as well
as the type of study he or she intends to do. The question that he/she should ask him/herself is: Are
there questions about this problem to which answers have not been found up to the present? The
research problem should be stated in such a way that it would lead to analytical thinking on the part of
the researcher with the aim of possibly concluding solutions to the stated problems. All other parts of
the proposal grow out of the problem statement
In addition
1. Statement of the problem section should not be is too narrow and should be supported by
quantitative and qualitative studies in concrete manner
2. Your proposal show gaps and evidences that grasp earlier research and statistical tools
3. Your STUDY should show how you know the gaps
4. You should show statement of the problems with quantitative and qualitative evidences around
the world, African continent
5. Your justification for each study variable under investigation SHOULD BE clearly stated
6. Please add other gaps that shows the major challenges and prospects on your study
7. In general please write your statement of the problems starting from broad and come to the
narrower
8. Please compare and contrast the major gaps bay taking threshold values (best practices) that
were applied by other researchers
9. be sure that your introduction and statement of the problem were pararal (match ) each other
(shows the same meanings and variables
10. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM SHOULD BE SUPPORTED BY REFERENCES
11. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM SHUOLD HAVE ATLEAST 2 PAGES
4. General
Comments
OBJECTIVES OF THE
STUDY
1.2. Objective of the study: The objectives of a research delineate the ends or aim which the
inquirer seeks to bring about as a result of completing the research undertaken. It may be
thought of as either a solution to a problem or an end state to be achieved in relation to the
problem. Commonly, research objectives are classified into two:
1.2.2. Specific objectives: It identifies in greater detail the specific aims of the research project,
often breaking down what is to be accomplished into smaller logical components. Use action
oriented verbs such as “to determine, to find out, to ascertain” in formulating specific
objectives which should be numerically listed.
1.2.3. These must be linked to the main objective in a logical way. When put together, the specific
objectives, which must be set in SMART formation must lead to the accomplishment of the
main objective of the study. For example, as a way of evaluating a given phenomenon, one
may want to measure certain indicators and so it would be appropriate to set a specific
objective that relates to quantification as part of the process of evaluation. It is normally the
case to formulate at least three specific objectives and no more than five.
HOW CAN YOU MEASURE YOUR SPECIFIC OBJCETIVES and research questions ?
be sure that your objectives both general and specific objectives were match with your
topics
be sure that your objectives both general and specific objectives were match with your
study variables
you have to know that how do you measure your general and specific objectives
Do you have any threshold values to measure your specific objectives?
General Comments scopes of the study Key Terms (operational meanings of variables)
Write properly the key terms those will be used in this research exhaustively.
Keep the sequence as well as the flow
General Comments on Literature review
Before starting your study please read at list
20 articles and journals to enhance
understandings of your study variables
2. Literature Review:
The purpose of the literature review is to situate your research in the context of what is already
known about a topic. It need not be exhaustive. It should provide the theoretical basis for your
work, show what has been done in the area by others, and set the stage for your work. In a
literature review you should give the reader enough ties to the literature that they feel confident
that you have found, read, and assimilated the literature in the field. It should probably move from
the more general to the more focused studies, but need not be exhaustive, only relevant. In
literature section you must incorporate the following items;
Theoretical analysis
Empirical analysis
Selective
Focused
Exhaustive
Related and
Relevant/ appropriate
Use sources (references) properly. No source/ reference. Even the used sources were most
from same source as well as old ones.
In addition
Here you are required to review (theoretical and empirical) literature for your proposal work.
For your thesis you will expand the proposal literature in depth.
2.1 Theoretical Literature Review: (here you should review theories, concepts, models,
approaches or and principles regarding your tittle or research areas)
2.2 Empirical Literature Review: (here you should review previous studies related with your
area or title----their agreements, controversies or discourses regarding the area or outcomes or
relationship)
2.3 Conceptual Framework: based on Theoretical and Empirical LR, develop or adopt or adapt
CF-Work to show the effect or relationship between Independent and Dependent Variables and
also moderating/mediating variables (if any)
2.4 Hypothesis : Based o your LR and CF-work…put your proposed hyphothesis by supporting
empirical evidences
3.1 Research Design (eg Descriptive, explanatory, exploratory….the reason behind using
them)
3.2 Research Approach (eg Qualitative or Quantitative or mixed)
3.3 Target Population of the study or Universe (Respondents from which data will be
collected and why)
3.4 Sample Design and Techniques
3.4.1 Sampling Frame and or Sampling Unit
3.4.2 Sampling Technique (Probability and Non-probability)
3.4.3 Sample Size Determination (Use Statistical Sampling Formula as per types of
population)
3.5 Sources of data
3.5.1 Primary Data Sources (eg Questionnaire, FGD, Interviews, etc)
3.5.2 Secondary Data Sources (annual reports, news papaer etc)
3.6 Methods of Data Analysis and Interpretation
3.6.1 Data management and Tools of Data Presentation like tables, graphs etc
3.6.2 Statistical Tools of Data Analysis
3.6.2.1 Descriptive Statistical Analysis eg mean, frequency standard deviation etc
3.6.2.2 Inferential Data Analysis eg correlation , regression etc
3.6.2.3 Model and Model Diagnostics or Specifications
Be consistent.
Write properly the reference based on the style you have selected. APA style is
recommended as usual
Use appropriate style recommended by your college
Whose reference style are you using?
For Masters Proposal/thesis, at least 50 and above references is must.
For articles
Lukic, T., Džamic, V., Knezevic, G., Alčaković, S., & Bošković, V. (2014). The
page.
Generally
Please be sure that your
preliminary pages were written
according to the format of your
institutions
The whole thesis and its body
should be written with times romans
writing style with 1.5 line spacing
and 12 as a font size
Please avoid spelling errors
starting from your cover pages
Under chapter two please do not
forget writing your variables with
details explanations as topic and
subtopics
On chapter three please be sure
that you have the real respondents as a
populations with representative
sample size