He 2008
He 2008
1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 72
2 Chemistry of Lambda-Cyhalothrin ..................................................................................... 72
2.1 Synthesis .................................................................................................................... 73
2.2 Physicochemical Properties ....................................................................................... 74
2.3 Mode of Action .......................................................................................................... 75
3 Breakdown Mechanisms and Products ............................................................................... 75
3.1 Photolysis ................................................................................................................... 75
3.2 Hydrolysis .................................................................................................................. 77
3.3 Microbial Degradation ............................................................................................... 78
4 Environmental Fate of Lambda-Cyhalothrin ...................................................................... 78
4.1 Dissipation in Water .................................................................................................. 78
4.2 Interaction with Soil and Sediment............................................................................ 78
5 Ecotoxicity of Lambda-Cyhalothrin ................................................................................... 81
5.1 Fish and Shellfish ...................................................................................................... 81
5.2 Macrophytes .............................................................................................................. 82
5.3 Invertebrates............................................................................................................... 82
5.4 Sediment Toxicity ...................................................................................................... 83
5.5 Effects on Soil Fauna ................................................................................................. 84
5.6 Bioaccumulation ........................................................................................................ 85
6 Mitigating Runoff of Residues Through Plant Interaction ................................................. 85
6.1 Assimilation by Plants ............................................................................................... 86
6.2 Adsorption and Degradation by Plants ...................................................................... 86
7 Summary ............................................................................................................................. 87
References ............................................................................................................................. 88
L.-M. He (*)
Surface Water Protection Program, Environmental Monitoring Branch, Department of Pesticide
Regulation, California Environmental Protection Agency, 1001 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814,
USA (e-mail: [email protected])
J. Troiano
Surface Water Protection Program, Environmental Monitoring Branch, Department of Pesticide
Regulation, California Environmental Protection Agency, 1001 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814, USA
K.S. Goh
Surface Water Protection Program, Environmental Monitoring Branch, Department of Pesticide
Regulation, California Environmental Protection Agency, 1001 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814, USA
A. Wang
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency,
P.O. Box 4010, Sacramento, CA 95812-4010, USA
1 Introduction
2 Chemistry of Lambda-Cyhalothrin
F3C O (S)-alcohol(Z)-(1R)-cis-acid
C CH C N
C O
CH3
Cl C
H
H H
CH3
O
a
H H
CH3
(R) - alcohol (Z) - (1S) - cis - acid
Cl
C O H
C CH CH3
O C
F3C
N C
O
b
3-(2-chloro-3, 3,3-trifluoroprop-1-enyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate
(Fig. 1b). Lambda-cyhalothrin was first reported by Robson and Crosby (1984) and
was introduced in Central America and the Far East in 1985 by ICI Agrochemicals
(now Syngenta).
2.1 Synthesis
isomers is characterized by the base chemical, which promotes the desired epimeriza-
tion through proton removal at the carbon atom bearing the cyano group (Cleugh and
Milner 1994). Gamma-cyhalothrin is a single stereoisomer that has effective insecti-
cidal activity, with a much lower total reported use in California (CDPR 2007).
the water column, including clay particles and organic matter, provides the primary
vector for transport through aquatic systems. Thus, the greatest risk to nontarget
aquatic organisms would be through exposure to lambda-cyhalothrin-contaminated
sediments. Adsorbed phases of chemical molecules generally show decreased deg-
radation rates because residues are less accessible to breakdown by sunlight or
microorganisms than when molecules are dissolved in the water column
(Schwarzenbach et al. 1993). Sorption of lambda-cyhalothrin to suspended solids
or bottom sediments may provide a mechanism to mitigate its acute toxicity to
aquatic organisms by reducing its short-term bioavailability in the water column.
Pyrethroids are axonic poisons that affect the nerve fiber by binding to a protein that
regulates the voltage-gated sodium channel. Normally, this gate opens to cause stimu-
lation of the nerve and closes to terminate the nerve signal. The channels are path-
ways through which ions are permitted to enter the axon and cause excitation. When
the channels are left open, nerve cells produce repetitive discharges and eventually
cause paralysis (Bradbury and Coats 1989; Shafer and Meyer 2004). Pyrethroids bind
to this gate and prevent it from closing normally, which results in continuous nerve
stimulation and tremors in poisoned insects. Poisoned organisms lose control of their
nervous system and are unable to produce coordinated movement.
There are two groups of pyrethroids with distinctive poisoning symptoms, denoted
as Type I and Type II. Chemically, Type II pyrethroids are distinguished from Type I
pyrethroids by the presence of an α-cyano group in their structure. In comparison to
Type I pyrethroids (e.g., permethrin), which exert their neurotoxicity primarily
through interference with sodium channel function in the central nervous system,
Type II pyrethroids (e.g., lambda-cyhalothrin) can also affect chloride and calcium
channels that are important for proper nerve function (Burr and Ray 2004).
Because of the lipophilic nature of pyrethroids, biological membranes and tissues
readily absorb them. Specifically, lambda-cyhalothrin penetrates the insect cuticle,
disrupting nerve conduction within minutes; this leads to cessation of feeding, loss
of muscular control, paralysis, and eventual death. Additional protection of the
crop is provided by the insecticide’s strong repellent effect toward insects.
3.1 Photolysis
F 3C O
C CH C OH
CH3
Cl (P1)
H H
CH3
F 3C O
C CH C N
C O
CH3
Cl C
H
H H
CH3
O
HO F3C
CH2 C CH C N
CH3
Cl
C
O (P3)
H H H
CH3
O
NC
CH2 (P4)
H3C
O
O
(P2)
(P5)
3.2 Hydrolysis
F3C O
C CH C N
C O
CH3
Cl C
H
H H
CH3
O
KOH
C N
HO F3C O
C
+ C CH
CH3
C OK
H
Cl
O
H H
CH3
HOOC
O + HCN
Lambda-cyhalothrin rapidly dissipates from water (Farmer et al. 1995). The fate of
lambda-cyhalothrin was compared in mesotrophic and eutrophic ditch microcosms
where it was applied three times at 1-wk intervals at concentrations of 10, 25, 50,
100, and 250 ng/L. The rate of dissipation of lambda-cyhalothrin in the water
column of the two systems was similar where, after 1 d, only 30% of the amount
applied remained in the water phase (Roessink et al. 2005). Similarly, in an investigation
of the fate of both gamma- and lambda-cyhalothrin in laboratory-simulated rice
paddy water, their concentrations decreased rapidly, with no gamma-cyhalothrin or
lambda-cyhalothrin detected after 3 and 4 d, respectively (Wang et al. 2007). Last,
after simulating a seasonal exposure equivalent to 12 “drift” and 6 “runoff” events,
each delivering a dose equivalent to that expected from a typical event under field
conditions, the lambda-cyhalothrin concentration measured after the final application
was less than 2 ng/L (Hadfield et al. 1993).
4.2.1 Adsorption
Adsorption is one of the key processes controlling the fate of pyrethroids, which, as
indicated by their high Koc values, results in rapid and strong adsorption to soils and
sediments. Ali and Baugh (2003) investigated the adsorption of lambda-cyhalothrin
to silica, which is the major mineral component in soil. They discovered much-
reduced sorption to the mineral component, implying that discharge of pyrethroids
to water bodies is mainly in the sorbed soil organic phase. In another study of sorption
to mineral components of soil, four pyrethroids were used to investigate selective
interactions with corundum, quartz, montmorillonite, and kaolinite. Initial pyrethroid
Environmental Chemistry, Ecotoxicity, and Fate of Lambda-Cyhalothrin 79
concentrations ranged from 1 to 100 µg/L. Sorption to glass centrifuge tubes used
in the batch experiments was significant and accounted for 25%–60% of total sorption
(Oudou and Hansen 2002; Zhou et al. 1995). All corrected adsorption isotherms fit
the Freundlich equation with exponential n values ranging between 0.9 and 1.1.
These n values indicated little curvature in the adsorption isotherm. Bonding affinities
per unit surface area decreased in the order corundum > quartz > montmorillonite
> kaolinite. All minerals showed the same selectivity order with respect to sorption
affinity of the four pyrethroids: lambda-cyhalothrin > deltamethrin > cypermethrin
> fenvalerate (Oudou and Hansen 2002).
Adsorption is a surface phenomenon that for pyrethroids has been shown to
depend on the surface area and the organic carbon content of the adsorption.
Sorption–desorption equilibria of six pyrethroids (permethrin, cyfluthrin, cyper-
methrin, lambda-cyhalothrin, deltamethrin, and fenvalerate) were determined after
24-hr equilibrium in soils with an organic carbon content that ranged from 1.15%
to 2.46%. Again, the Freundlich equation fit the adsorption isotherms well, with the
values of the exponent n around unity. The desorbed amount of lambda-cyhalothrin
after five steps of desorption using deionized water was only 4.68% of the original
amount, indicating that lambda-cyhalothrin adsorption to soil was virtually irre-
versible in water (Ali and Baugh 2003).
The phase distribution of lambda-cyhalothrin was investigated as a function of
contact time in sediment (Bondarenko et al. 2006). For freshwater sediments at 9 d,
the dissolved fraction measured by solid-phase microextraction ranged from 1.7%
to 16.3% of the total pore-water concentration as determined by liquid–liquid
extraction. The dissolved fraction decreased substantially with contact time to less
than 5% at 30 d after sediment dosing. The dissolved fraction was lower in the
marine sediment, ranging from 1.1% to 4.2%. Consequently, the apparent KOC and
dissolved organic carbon partition coefficient (KDOC) values increased significantly
over the contact time, especially in the freshwater sediment, suggesting that phase
distribution was not at equilibrium after 9 d.
In general, the adsorption capacity of all soils with different organic content was
much higher than that of pure mineral particles, suggesting that lambda-cyhalothrin
had partitioned into the organic carbon phase as well as adsorbed onto the particle
surfaces. However, in investigations of the adsorptive capacity of organic coatings
on minerals, Zhou et al. (1995) discovered that adsorption was not constant and that
it decreased with increasing polarity and decreasing aromaticity of organic sorb-
ents. This result implied that the quantity, as well as the quality, of the organic mat-
ter on particle surfaces should be characterized to better predict contaminant
transport in aquatic and soil environments.
5 Ecotoxicity of Lambda-Cyhalothrin
now. An EC50, the concentration at which the effect occurs in 50% of the test popu-
lation, for eastern oyster is 0.59 ng/L. A bioconcentration factor (BCF) of 2240 has
been reported in fish (species unspecified), but concentration was confined to
nonedible tissues and rapid depuration was observed (USDA 2007; USEPA 2007).
Because lambda-cyhalothrin is commonly applied to rice fields to control
insects, potential water and sediment contamination may lead to toxicity in aquatic
organisms such as mosquitofish, shrimps, crabs, and clams. Replicated enclosures
in a rice field were sprayed with the lambda-cyhalothrin product Warrior at 5.8 g
a.i./ha. Mosquitofish were added either before the spray or 7 d later. Of those added
before the spray, none survived. Most fish added 7 d later survived (Lawler et al.
2003). Lambda-cyhalothrin showed high toxicity to shrimp (Macrobrachium nip-
poensis de Haan) and zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio H.B). The 96-hr LC50 was 20–
70 ng/L for shrimp and 0.98–7.55 µg/L for zebrafish. In drainage water ponds with
lambda-cyhalothrin concentrations ranging from 0.45 to 0.90 µg/L, the 96-hr mor-
tality was 100% for shrimp, but the drainage water showed no toxicity to shrimp
on the fourth day after application of lambda-cyhalothrin (Gu et al. 2007). The 96-
hr LC50 values for lambda-cyhalothrin and gamma-cyhalothrin were similar for
zebrafish (1.93 µg/L for gamma and 1.94 µg/L for lambda). However, lambda-cyhalothrin
was more toxic (LC50, 0.04 µg/L) than gamma-cyhalothrin (LC50, 0.28 µg/L) to
shrimp, possibly implying that the toxicity to shrimp is likely stereochemistry
dependent (Wang et al. 2007).
5.2 Macrophytes
5.3 Invertebrates
250 ng/L (Roessink et al. 2005). Initial, direct effects were primarily on arthropod
taxa. The most sensitive species was the phantom midge (Chaoborus obscuripes).
At treatment levels of 25 ng/L and higher, apparent population and community
responses occurred. At treatments of 100 and 250 ng/L, the rate of recovery of the
macroinvertebrate community was lower in the macrophyte-dominated systems,
primarily because of a prolonged decline of the amphipod Gammarus pulex. This
species occurred at high densities only in the macrophyte-dominated enclosures.
Indirect effects (e.g., increase of rotifers and microcrustaceans) were more pro-
nounced in the plankton-dominated test systems, particularly at treatment levels of
25 ng/L and higher.
Simulated aquatic ditch mesocosms were used to understand the toxic effects of
potential spray drift from a typical crop application of pesticides including lambda-
cyhalothrin. Spray application to the water surface was at 0.2%, 1%, and 5% of the
recommended label rates. To interpret the observed effects, treatment concentra-
tions were expressed in toxic units (TU = actual concentration/EC50) (Arts et al.
2006), which describe the relative toxicity of the compounds with common toxicity
test organisms (Daphnia and algae). After treatment, lambda-cyhalothrin disap-
peared from the water phase within 2 d. At the 5% treatment level, exposure con-
centrations exceeded 0.1 TUDaphnia, and this resulted in long-term effects on
zooplankton and macroinvertebrates, some of which did not fully recover by the
end of the study (Arts et al. 2006). Previous studies with pesticides in experimental
ecosystems have demonstrated that effects on primary producers are likely to occur
at TUAlgae > 0.1 and effects on invertebrates are likely to occur at TU > 0.01–0.1
(Van Wijngaarden et al. 2004, 2005).
Recent studies have shown that pyrethroids including lambda-cyhalothrin are com-
monly found in aquatic sediments in the heavily agricultural Central Valley of
California, and therefore the toxicity of sediment-associated pyrethroid residues to
aquatic organisms has been actively investigated (Amweg et al. 2005; Weston et al.
2004). Seventy sediment samples were collected from 42 sites over a 10-county
area in the agriculture-dominated Central Valley of California, with most sites
located in irrigation canals and small creeks dominated by agricultural effluent.
Significant mortality was observed with the amphipod Hyalella azteca at 42% of
the locations and for the midge Chironomus tentans at 40% of the sites. Using a
toxicity unit analysis, measured pyrethroid concentrations were sufficiently high to
have contributed to the toxicity in 40% of samples toxic to C. tentans and nearly
70% of samples toxic to H. azteca (Weston et al. 2004).
In a follow-up aquatic toxicity study with six pyrethroids (Amweg et al. 2005),
the average 10-d median lethal concentration LC50 of sediment-associated residues
of lambda-cyhalothrin was 0.45 µg/g OC (organic carbon adjusted), corresponding
to an estimated pore-water concentration of 1.4 ng/L. Lambda-cyhalothrin would
84 L.-M. He et al.
kg dry soil/hr and in pesticide-treated soil ranging from 12–13 to 23–25 O2/kg dry
soil/hr on days 1 and 28, respectively. The concentrations of nitrate and ammonium
ions, numbers of total cultivable bacteria, denitrifying bacteria, nitrogen-fixing bacteria,
and fungi were either unaffected or even stimulated by the pesticide treatments.
5.5 Bioaccumulation
extensively studied. The results indicate that vegetated ditches are useful for
the reduction of lambda-cyhalothrin in stormwater or agricultural runoff
(Bennett et al. 2005; Bouldin et al. 2005; Leistra et al. 2004; Moore et al. 2001;
Roessink et al. 2005). Pesticide uptake, adsorption, and accelerated degradation
by plants in a vegetated ditch are the principal mechanisms of mitigation by
plants, as described next.
Macrophytes (e.g., Juncus effuses and Ludwigia peploides) can take up a significant
portion of lambda-cyhalothrin residues in water. Eight days after application, 98.2%
of lambda-cyhalothrin was found in the roots of L. peploides. Translocation of
lambda-cyhalothrin in J. effusus resulted in 25.4% of pesticide uptake partitioning
into upper plant biomass. These macrophytes showed species- and pesticide-specific
uptake rates, and therefore the selection of high-uptake plants enhances mitigation
capabilities in edge-of-field conveyance structures (Bouldin et al. 2006).
Plants growing in an agricultural drainage ditch not only slow water flow and
absorb chemicals dissolved in water, but they will also act as surfaces for pesticide
adsorption and catalysts for their degradation. Many studies have been conducted
to investigate the effectiveness of vegetated drainage ditches for reducing pesticide
residue export from agricultural lands to creeks and rivers (Bennett et al. 2005;
Bouldin et al. 2005; Moore et al. 2001). By incorporating vegetated drainage
ditches into a watershed management program, agriculture can continue to decrease
potential non-point source threats to downstream aquatic receiving systems.
Overall results of previous studies illustrate that aquatic macrophytes play an
important role in the retention and distribution of pyrethroids, including lambda-
cyhalothrin, in vegetated agricultural drainage ditches.
The reduction effectiveness of pesticides through a drainage ditch is usually
described by the percentage of reduction of the pesticide:
The reduction% is affected by several factors including the length and slope of
ditch, the type and density of vegetation, and the type of soil (Arts et al. 2006;
Bennett et al. 2005; Bouldin et al. 2005; Leistra et al. 2004; Milam et al. 2004;
Moore et al. 2001; Roessink et al. 2005).
Laboratory studies indicated that adsorption to macrophytes was extensive and
essentially irreversible, and that degradation of lambda-cyhalothrin occurred rapidly
by cleavage of the ester bond. In the indoor microcosm, which contained water,
Environmental Chemistry, Ecotoxicity, and Fate of Lambda-Cyhalothrin 87
sediment, and macrophytes, degradation was also rapid, with DT50 and DT90 values
of less than 3 and 19 hr, respectively, for dissipation from the water column and less
than 3 and 56 hr, respectively, for dissipation from the whole system (Hand et al.
2001). The adsorption of lambda-cyhalothrin by Ludwigia peploides (water prim-
rose) and Juncus effusus (soft rush) was significant and reached as high as 86.50 µg/
kg (Bouldin et al. 2005).
In a vegetated drainage ditch study, following initiation of simulated runoff,
mean percentages of lambda-cyhalothrin concentrations in water and sediment in
the ditch were 12% and 1%, respectively. Lambda-cyhalothrin mean percentage
concentrations in plants [Polygonum (water smartweed), Leersia (cutgrass), and
Sporobolus (smutgrass)] were 87%. The concentrations in water decreased to
levels safe for nontarget species 50 m downstream from the point of input (Moore
et al. 2001).
A controlled-release runoff simulation was conducted on a 650-m vegetated
drainage ditch in the Mississippi Delta. Lambda-cyhalothrin was released into the
ditch in a water–sediment slurry (Bennett et al. 2005). Samples of water, sediment,
and plants were collected and analyzed for lambda-cyhalothrin concentrations.
Three hours following runoff initiation, inlet lambda-cyhalothrin water concentra-
tion was 374 µg/L in the inlet and 7.24 µg/L at 200 m downstream. No lambda-
cyhalothrin residues were detected at the 400-m sampling site. A similar trend was
observed throughout the first 7 d of the study where water concentrations were ele-
vated at the front end of the ditch (∼25 m) and greatly reduced downstream at the
400-m sampling site. Regression formulas predicted that lambda-cyhalothrin con-
centrations in ditch water were reduced to 10% of the initial value within 280 m
downstream from point of input. Mass balance calculations determined that ditch
plants constituted the major sink and/or sorption site responsible for the rapid aque-
ous pyrethroid dissipation.
In a ditch study conducted in the Netherlands, concentrations of lambda-cyha-
lothrin decreased rapidly in the water column: 24%–40% of the dose remained in
the water 1 d after application, and it had decreased to 1.8%–6.5% after 3 d (Leistra
et al. 2004). At the highest plant density, lambda-cyhalothrin residues in the plant
compartment reached a maximum of 50% of the dose after 1 d; at intermediate and
low plant densities, this maximum was only 3%–11% of the dose (after 1–2 d). The
percentage of the insecticide in the ditch sediment was 12% or less of the dose and
tended to be lower at higher plant densities. Alkaline hydrolysis in the water near
the surface of macrophytes and phytoplankton is considered to be the main dissipa-
tion process for lambda-cyhalothrin.
7 Summary
References
Ali MA, Baugh PJ (2003) Sorption-desorption studies of six pyrethroids and mirex on soils using
GC/MS-NICI. Int J Environ Anal Chem 83:923–933.
Amweg EL, Weston DP (2005) Use and toxicity of pyrethroid pesticides in the Central Valley,
California, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:1300–1301.
Amweg EL, Weston DP, Ureda NM (2005) Use and toxicity of pyrethroid pesticides in the Central
Valley, California, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:966–972.
Amweg EL, Weston DP, You J, Lydy MJ (2006) Pyrethroid insecticides and sediment toxicity in
urban creeks from California and Tennessee. Environ Sci Technol 40:1700–1706.
Arts GHP, Guijse-Bogdan LL, Belgers JDM, Van Rhenen-Kersten CH, Van Wijngaarden RPA,
Roessink I, Maund SJ, Van den Brink PJ, Brock TCM (2006) Ecological impact in ditch meso-
cosms of simulated spray drift from a crop protection program for potatoes. Integr Environ
Assess Manag 2:105–125.
Bennett ER, Moore MT, Cooper CM, Smith S, Shields FD, Drouillard KG, Schulz R (2005)
Vegetated agricultural drainage ditches for the mitigation of pyrethroid-associated runoff.
Environ Toxicol Chem 24:2121–2127.
Bondarenko S, Putt A, Kavanaugh S, Poletika N, Gan JY (2006) Time dependence of phase dis-
tribution of pyrethroid insecticides in sediment. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:3148–3154.
Bouldin JL, Farris JL, Moore MT Jr, Stephens WW, Cooper CM (2005) Evaluated fate and effects
of atrazine and lambda-cyhalothrin in vegetated and unvegetated microcosms. Environ Toxicol
20:487–498.
Bouldin JL, Farris JL, Moore MT, Smith JS, Cooper CM (2006) Hydroponic uptake of atrazine
and lambda-cyhalothrin in Juncus effusus and Ludwigia peploides. Chemosphere
65:1049–1057.
Environmental Chemistry, Ecotoxicity, and Fate of Lambda-Cyhalothrin 89
Laabs V, Amelung W, Pinto A, Altstaedt A, Zech W (2000) Leaching and degradation of corn
and soybean pesticides in an Oxisol of the Brazilian Cerrados. Chemosphere 41:1441–1449.
Laskowski DA (2002) Physical and chemical properties of pyrethroids. Rev Environ Contam
Toxicol 174:49–170.
Lawler SP, Dritz DA, Godfrey LD (2003) Effects of the agricultural insecticide lambda-cyhalothrin
(Warrior (™) ) on mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis). J Am Mosq Control Assoc 19:430–432.
Lawler SP, Dritz DA, Christiansen JA, Cornel AJ (2007) Effects of lambda-cyhalothrin on mos-
quito larvae and predatory aquatic insects. Pest Manag Sci 63:234–240.
Leistra M, Zweers AJ, Warinton JS, Crum SJ, Hand LH, Beltman WH, Maund SJ (2004) Fate of
the insecticide lambda-cyhalothrin in ditch enclosures differing in vegetation density. Pest
Manag Sci 60:75–84.
Maund SJ, Hamer MJ, Warinton JS, Kedwards TJ (1998) Aquatic ecotoxicology of the pyrethroid
insecticide lambda-cyhalothrin: considerations for higher-tier aquatic risk assessment. Pestic
Sci 54:408–417.
Mertens J, Vervaeke P, Meers E, Tack FMG (2006) Seasonal changes of metals in willow (Salix
sp.) stands for phytoremediation on dredged sediment. Environ Sci Technol 40:1962–1968.
Milam CD, Bouldin JL, Farris JL, Schulz R, Moore MT, Bennett ER, Cooper CM, Smith S (2004)
Evaluating acute toxicity of methyl parathion application in constructed wetland mesocosms.
Environ Toxicol 19:471–479.
Montes-Bayon M, Yanes EG, Ponce de Leon C, Jayasimhulu K, Stalcup A, Shann J, Caruso JA
(2002) Initial studies of selenium speciation in Brassica juncea by LC with ICPMS and ES-
MS detection: an approach for phytoremediation studies. Anal Chem 74:107–113.
Moore MT, Bennett ER, Cooper CM, Smith S, Shields FD, Milam CD, Farris JL (2001) Transport
and fate of atrazine and lambda-cyhalothrin in an agricultural drainage ditch in the Mississippi
Delta, USA. Agric Ecosyst Environ 87:309–314.
Oros DR, Werner I (2005) Pyrethroid Insecticides: An Analysis of Use Patterns, Distributions,
Potential Toxicity and Fate in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and Central Valley. White
Paper for the Interagency Ecological Program. SFEI Contribution 415. San Francisco Estuary
Institute, Oakland, CA.
Oudo H, Hansen HC (2002) Sorption of lambda-cyhalothrin, cypermethrin, deltamethrin and fen-
valerate to quartz, corundum, kaolinite and montmorillonite. Chemosphere 49:1285–1294.
PAN (2007) PAN Pesticides Database, Chemicals. http://www.pesticideinfo.org/List_Chemicals.jsp.
Accessed July 20, 2007.
Reichenberger S, Amelung W, Laabs V, Pinto A, Totsche KU, Zech W (2002) Pesticide displace-
ment along preferential flow pathways in a Brazilian Oxisol. Geoderma 110:63–86.
Robson MJ and Crosby J (1984) Insecticidal product and preparation thereof. European Patent
Office. Patent Number EU 106469. UK.
Roessink I, Arts GHP, Belgers JDM, Bransen F, Maund SJ, Brock TCM (2005) Effects of lambda-
cyhalothrin in two ditch microcosm systems of different trophic status. Environ Toxicol Chem
24:1684–1696.
Ruzo LO, Krishnamurthy VV, Casida JE, Gohre K (1987) Pyrethroid photochemistry: influence
of the chloro(trifluoromethyl)vinyl substituent in cyhalothrin. J Agric Food Chem
35:879–883.
Schwarzenbach RP, Gschwend PM, Imboden DM (1993) Environmental Organic Chemistry.
Wiley, New York.
Shafer TJ, Meyer DA (2004) Effects of pyrethroids on voltage-sensitive calcium channels: a criti-
cal evaluation of strengths, weaknesses, data needs, and relationship to assessment of cumula-
tive neurotoxicity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 196:303–318.
Siciliano SD, Goldie H, Germida JJ (1998) Enzymatic activity in root exudates of Dahurian wild
rye (Elymus dauricus) that degrades 2-chlorobenzoic acid. J Agric Food Chem 46:5–7.
Spurlock F (2006) Synthetic pyrethroids and California surface water: use patterns, properties,
and unique aspects. http://wwwcdprcagov/docs/sw/swposters/spurlock_acs06pdf.
Starner K (2007) Data queried from the Department of Pesticide Regulation Surface Water
Monitoring Database.
Environmental Chemistry, Ecotoxicity, and Fate of Lambda-Cyhalothrin 91