Codebook Bas Jan23
Codebook Bas Jan23
CODEBOOK
Scholars who wish to use this dataset in their research are kindly requested to cite both the original
source (as stated in this codebook) and also use the following citation:
https://www.gu.se/en/quality-government
The QoG Institute
P.O. Box 711
405 30 Gothenburg
Sweden
[email protected]
Contents
1 Introduction 3
1.1 The Quality of Government Institute . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2 The QoG Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.3 Important note on the terms of use of these datasets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.4 QoG Basic Dataset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.5 Changes in this edition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3 Identification Variables 22
1
4.27 Freedom on the Net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
4.28 Global Competitiveness Report 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142
4.29 Global Corruption Barometer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148
4.30 Global Data Governance Mapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159
4.31 Global Footprint data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161
4.32 Global Health Observatory data repository . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162
4.33 Global Militarization Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164
4.34 Global Peace Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166
4.35 Global Terrorism Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168
4.36 HRV Transparency Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170
4.37 Human Development Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172
4.38 IMF GFS - Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG) . . . . . . . . . . . 174
4.39 Ibrahim Index of African Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176
4.40 Information Capacity Dataset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182
4.41 Institutions and Elections Project Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184
4.42 Integrated Values Surveys (WVS/EVS trend 1981-2022) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190
4.43 Inter-Parliamentary Union Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210
4.44 KOF Index of Globalization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212
4.45 Luxembourg Income Study database and the Luxembourg Wealth Study database . 216
4.46 Maddison Project Database 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218
4.47 Measures of Democracy 1810-2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220
4.48 Migration and Remittances Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222
4.49 National Elections Across Democracy and Autocracy, Version 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . 224
4.50 Oil and Gas Data, 1932-2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228
4.51 Open Budget Survey data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230
4.52 Penn World Table . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232
4.53 Political Constraint Index (POLCON) Dataset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234
4.54 Polity V Annual Time-Series, 1800-2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236
4.55 Religion and State Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239
4.56 Rule of Law Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241
4.57 Settler Mortality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249
4.58 State Fragility Index and Matrix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250
4.59 Sustainable Governance Indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252
4.60 The ATOP State-Year dataset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 266
4.61 The Authoritarian Regime Dataset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268
4.62 The Bayesian Corruption Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 274
4.63 The CIRIGHTS Data project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 276
4.64 The Comparative Abortion Index Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 283
4.65 The GenDip database on Gender and Diplomatic Representation . . . . . . . . . . . 285
4.66 The Gender Inequality Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 287
4.67 The International Country Risk Guide (ICRG) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289
4.68 The Ocean Health Index Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 291
4.69 The Political Terror Scale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 293
4.70 The Property Rights Protection Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 296
4.71 The Worldwide Governance Indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 298
4.72 UN E-Government Knowledgebase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 302
4.73 Varieties of Democracy Dataset version 12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 304
4.74 Voter Turnout Database . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 311
4.75 World Development Indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313
4.76 World Happiness Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 382
4.77 World Inequality Database . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 383
4.78 World Press Freedom Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 386
5 Bibliography 388
6 Appendix 392
2
1 Introduction
The QoG Institute was founded in 2004 by Professor Bo Rothstein and Professor Sören Holmberg. It
is an independent research institute within the Department of Political Science at the University of
Gothenburg. The institute conducts research on the causes, consequences and nature of Good Gover-
nance and the Quality of Government (QoG) - that is, trustworthy, reliable, impartial, uncorrupted,
and competent government institutions.
The main objective of the research is to address the theoretical and empirical problems of how political
institutions of high quality can be created and maintained. The second objective is to study the effects
of Quality of Government on a number of policy areas, such as health, environment, social policy,
and poverty. While Quality of Government is the common intellectual focal point of the research
institute, a variety of theoretical and methodological perspectives are applied.
One aim of the QoG Institute is to make comparative data on QoG and its correlates publicly
available. To accomplish this, we have compiled several datasets that draw on a number of freely
available data sources, including aggregated individual-level data. The QoG datasets are available in
several file formats, making them usable in most statistical softwares as well as in Excel.
The QoG Standard Dataset is our largest dataset consisting of more than 2,000 variables. For those
who prefer a smaller dataset, we provide the QoG Basic Dataset, consisting of approximately the
300 most used variables from the QoG Standard Dataset. We also provide a dataset called the
QoG OECD Dataset which covers OECD member countries and has high data coverage in terms of
geography and time.
The Standard, Basic, and OECD datasets are all available in both time-series (TS) and cross-sectional
(CS) versions, as separate datasets. In the TS datasets, the unit of analysis is country-year (e.g.
Sweden-1984, Sweden-1985 and so on). The CS datasets, unlike the TS datasets, do not include
multiple years for a particular country, therefore, the unit of analysis is country. Although, many of
the variables are available in both TS and CS, some variables are not, so it is advisable to use the
codebook to see which variables are included. Each variable entry in this codebook specifies in which
dataset you will find the variable.
The variables in the Standard, Basic, and OECD datasets are categorized in 19 thematic categories.
This categorization should be seen as a guideline rather than a definite classification. Most variables
belong only to one category, but some variables belong to more than one category.
On the QoG website, we also provide three additional datasets. The QoG Expert Survey (2012, 2015
and 2020), the QoG EU Regional Dataset (2016 and 2020) and the QoG EQI Dataset (2010, 2013,
2017 and 2021). The QoG Expert Survey is a dataset based on a survey among experts on public
administration around the world. The data is available in an individual dataset and an aggregated
dataset. The QoG EU Regional dataset is a dataset consisting of approximately 450 variables covering
three levels of European regions. The EQI dataset is based on a survey among 34,000 respondents
and concerns corruption on a regional level within the EU (NUTS 2).
Previous versions of all our datasets are available in the Data Archive on the QoG website:
https://www.gu.se/en/quality-government/qog-data/data-downloads/data-archive
3
1.3 Important note on the terms of use of these datasets
The QoG datasets are open and available, free of charge and without a need to register your data.
You can use them for your analysis, graphs, teaching, and other academic-related and non-commercial
purposes. We ask our users to cite always the original source(s) of the data and our datasets.
We do not allow other uses of these data including but not limited to redistribution, commercialization
and other for-profit usage. If a user is interested in such use or has doubts about the license, they
will have to refer to the original source and check with them if this is allowed and what requirements
they need to fulfill.
Be mindful the original data sources are the only owners of their data and they can adjust their
license without previous warning.
4
1.4 QoG Basic Dataset
In the QoG Basic CS dataset, data from and around 2019 is included. Data from 2019 is prioritized,
however, if no data are available for a country for 2019, data for 2020 is included. If no data for 2020
exists, data for 2018 is included, and so on up to a maximum of +/- 3 years.
While this works fine for some variables, it does not for others. For GDP growth it might be far from
ideal to use figures from the following or previous year, whereas it might be more or less unproblematic
for bureaucratic structures, which are more stable and fluctuate less. We advise you to carefully read
the codebook and use your own judgment when using the CS dataset.
Besides the quality criteria for including new datasets and variables into the QoG datasets, we have
chosen to add a few rules regarding the number of countries and years a variable must have available
in order to be included in these datasets. This also might mean that the original dataset may include
other variables, and we urge the users of these datasets to check the original sources as well. For the
QoG Basic CS dataset, we drop variables that have information for less than 16 countries after we
have picked the data from the focus year or +/- 3 years.
In the description of each variable in this codebook, there are basic descriptive statistics (minimum
year, maximum year and number of countries (N)) and a map indicating the countries that have data
for that specific variable in the CS dataset. If the variable is not included in the CS dataset there is
a text simply stating that this is the case. The maps should not be confused as visualizations of the
data itself; they are only visualizations of the data availability in the dataset.
In the QoG Basic TS dataset, data from 1946 to 2022 are included and the unit of analysis is country-
year (e.g. Sweden-1946, Sweden-1947 and so on).
As countries are not a static phenomenon, this has resulted in a number of what we call historical
countries. Historical countries are in most cases denoted by a parenthesis, following the country name,
and within the parenthesis we have added the to- date (e.g. Ethiopia (-1992)). Consequentially, the
historical countries are often associated with a present-day version of the "same" country. These are
also denoted by a parenthesis but within that parenthesis we have added the from-date (e.g. Ethiopia
(1993-)). You will find more information on which countries this applies to, and our line of reasoning
for each country, in the section on countries and time coverage.
We have decided not to include data that was available for a country before that country became
independent according to our judgment. This is debatable; it might be argued that if an original
source has included values, the values are correct and could be included. However, we have reasoned
that if the datasets primarily are used in cross-country comparisons, all units should be independent
countries and not, for example, semi-independent territories.
Regarding the inclusion of variables according to the countries and years covered, for the QoG Basic
TS dataset, we drop variables that have information for less than 16 countries and less than four
years.
In each entry in this codebook there are basic descriptive statistics (minimum year, maximum year,
number of countries (N), number of observations (n), average number of countries per year (N ) and
average number of years per country (T )) and a bar graph indicating the number of countries with
data available each year from 1946 to 2021. If the variable is not included in the TS dataset, there
is a text simply stating that this is the case. These should not be confused as visualizations of the
data itself; it is only visualizations of the data availability in the datasets.
5
1.4.3 Country and Time Coverage
When deciding which countries to include in the datasets, we have relied on the following reasoning:
We have included current members of the United Nations (UN) as well as previous members, provided
that their de facto sovereignty has not changed substantially since they were members; this means
that we, for example, have included Taiwan.
Using UN membership to decide whether or not to include a country in the dataset works quite well
for cases from around 1955. Afterwards, independent states, in general, joined the UN following
independence. This leaves us with the question of what to do with countries that might be said to
have been independent some time during the period 1946 to around 1955, but were not independent
after that period (such as Tibet). We have decided to include data for Tibet from 1946 to 1950,
making it possible for users to decide for themselves whether to include Tibet in their analysis or not.
It is worth noting that we do not use the date on which a country gained membership to the UN to
decide when a country came into being, but to determine which countries to include. All in all, this
means that we have 194 countries included in the cross-sectional dataset.
In the time-series dataset, we include the same 194 nations, plus an additional 17 historical countries
that did not exist in 2014: Tibet, Pakistan pre 1971 (including East Pakistan, presently Bangladesh),
North and South Vietnam, North and South Yemen, East and West Germany, Yugoslavia pre 1992
(the Peoples Republic of Yugoslavia), Serbia and Montenegro, the USSR, Czechoslovakia, Ethiopia
pre 1993 (including Eritrea), France pre 1962 (including Algeria), Malaysia pre 1965 (including Sin-
gapore), Cyprus pre 1974 (including the later Turkish occupied north Cyprus) and Sudan pre 2012
(including South Sudan). This makes a total of 211 countries. In the Appendix we have included the
full list of countries and a short note on how we have reasoned for each country.
Unfortunately, no established international standard exists on how historical cases, resulting either
from country mergers or country splits, should be treated in a time-series setting. We have applied
the following principles:
After a merger of two countries, the new country is considered a new case, even when the new state
formed could be considered as a continuation of one of the merging states. This rule applies to: (1)
Vietnam, which merged from North and South Vietnam in 1976; (2) Yemen, which merged from
North and South Yemen in 1990: and (3) Germany, which merged from East and West Germany in
1990.
If a country has split, the new countries are considered new cases, even when one of the new states
could be considered as a continuation of the state that split. This rule applies to: (1) Pakistan, which
was split into Pakistan and Bangladesh in 1971; (2) the USSR, which was split into 15 Post-Soviet
countries in 1991; (3) Yugoslavia, which was split into Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina,
North Macedonia, and Serbia and Montenegro in 1991; (4) Czechoslovakia, which was split into the
Czech Republic and Slovakia in 1993; (5) France which was split into France and Algeria in 1962;
(6) Malaysia which was split into Malaysia and Singapore in 1965; (7) Cyprus which was occupied
by Turkey in 1974, effectively splitting the country into Cyprus and the internationally unrecognized
northern Cyprus; and (8) Ethiopia, which was split into Ethiopia and Eritrea in 1993. There is one
exception to this rule: Indonesia is considered a continuation of the country that existed before the
independence of Timor-Leste in 2002 (while Timor-Leste is considered a new country).
Since most of the original data sources treat these cases of country mergers and splits differently, we
have rearranged data in accordance with our criteria above. Consequently, if a merger or a split has
occurred and a data source does not treat the countries as different cases, we consider them to be
different cases.
To determine where to put the data for the year of the merger/split and when to include data
for a newly independent country, we have relied on the July 1st-principle. If the merger/split or
independence occurred after July 1st, the data for this year will belong to the historical country or
it will not be included.
6
Thus, for example: If Germany in a data source is treated as a continuation of West Germany, we
place data up to and including 1990 on West Germany and leave Germany blank until and including
1990, since the merger of Germany occurred in October 1990 (after July 1st, 1990). If, on the other
hand, Serbia and Montenegro in a data source is treated as a continuation of Yugoslavia, we place the
data up to and including 1991 on Yugoslavia and from 1992 and onward on Serbia and Montenegro
(which is left blank until and including 1991), since the split occurred from June 1991-March 1992
(before July 1st, 1992).
Finally, Cyprus (1974-) denotes the Greek part of the island after the Turkish occupation. Most
sources probably do the same with the data they refer to Cyprus, but the documentation of the
original data rarely specifies this.
In 2018, we updated the name of Swaziland to Eswatini (former Swaziland) and in 2019, we updated
the name of Macedonia to North Macedonia; however, the other identification codes remain the same.
7
1.4.4 A brief note on the QoG Basic 2023 update
To improve consistency and compatibility of statistical data related to QoG, we continuously work
to improve the coverage and data quality. For the 2023 update of the QoG Basic Dataset, we have
included four new data sources that were not previously part of the QoG datasets. These are:
• Global Data Governance Map (Struett, Zable & Aaronson, 2022). This dataset focused on how
governments around the world govern data on six different attributes: strategic, regulatory,
responsible, structural, participatory and international.
• Enterprise Surveys (The World Bank, 2022). The World Bank Enterprise Surveys offer an
expansive array of economic data on 180,000 firms in 154 countries.
• WJP Rule of Law Index 2022 (World Justice Project, 2022). This dataset measures how the
rule of law is experienced and perceived in practical, everyday situations by the general public
around the world.
• The GenDip database on Gender and Diplomatic Representation (Niklasson & Towns, 2022).
The purpose of this dataset is to provide information on the gender of diplomats around the
world.
• The Data on Central Bank Independence (Romelli, 2022). This dataset provides information
on a comprehensive index of CBI covering a wide range of central bank characteristics based
on the charters of 154 central banks, over the period 1972-2017.
8
1.5 Changes in this edition
Changes in variables:
• The World Development Indicators GDP variables with a reference to a particular year have
been updated from 2010 to 2015.
Changes in datasets:
• The Freedom on the Net dataset is now presented by Freedom House as a single time-series
file. QoG Data previously would merge the different versions together. This new unique file
has some differences in values compared to previous iterations.
• The World Health Organization’s Global Health Observatory data repository no longer contains
the variable "Prevalence of smoking tobacco products in adults(%)". From this repository, we
have added the variable "Anaemia prevalence in pregnant women" (who_anpreg).
• Eurostat has dropped the variable "GDP at current market prices, Million PPS" (QoG code:
eu_eco2gdpmiopps), therefore, we have also dropped this variable.
• We have added Colombia and Costa Rica to the OECD compilation datasets, as they have both
been accepted as OECD memebers.
• The following datasets have been removed from this year’s compilations: Index of Public In-
tegrity (Mungiu-Pippidi et al.), The Quality of Government (La Porta et al.), Democracy Time-
Series (Norris), The Economic Effect of Constitutions (Persson & Tabellini), the Ethnolinguistic
Fractionalization (ELF) Indices (Roeder), Level of Shadow Economy (Elgin & Oztunali), Com-
parative Political Parties Dataset (Swank) and Freedom Rising (Welzel).
9
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Rasha Khoury and Anna-Maria Kovalicka their invaluable help in the pro-
duction of these codebooks.
10
2 List of Variables by Category
Associational/Assembly Rights 28
Conflict Intensity 31
Equal Opportunity 34
Political Participation 41
Socio-Economic Barriers 45
Freedom of Assembly and Association 276
Social Globalization 214
Trust in Other People 121
Feel personally obliged to report corruption: Agree (% respondents) 150
Can people fight aganist corruption: agree (% respondents) 156
Is it socially acceptable to report corruption: agree (% respondents) 157
Would spend a whole day in court to give evidence: agree (% respondents) 158
Population (in the 1000’s) 127
Global Peace Index 166
Population (in millions) 233
Women political empowerment index 307
Birth rate, crude (per 1,000 people) 320
Death rate, crude (per 1,000 people) 323
Fertility rate, total (births per woman) 344
Life expectancy at birth, total (years) 358
Life expectancy at birth, female (years) 359
Life expectancy at birth, male (years) 360
Population, total 365
Population ages 0-14 (% of total population) 366
Population ages 15-64 (% of total population) 366
Population ages 65 and above (% of total population) 367
Population density (people per sq. km of land area) 368
Rural population (% of total population) 368
Urban population (% of total population) 369
Post-Materialist index 12-item 202
Most people can be trusted 208
2.2 Conflict
11
Internally displaced persons, total displaced by conflict-violence (number) 356
Confidence: Armed Forces 190
Political system: Having the army rule 203
2.3 Education
Infrastructure 180
Gas production value in 2014 dollars 228
Oil production value in 2014 dollars 229
Access to electricity (% of population) 313
Access to electricity, rural (% of rural population) 314
Access to electricity, urban (% of urban population) 314
Alternative and nuclear energy (% of total energy use) 316
Fixed broadband subscriptions (per 100 people) 321
Renewable electricity output (% of total electricity output) 325
Electricity production from coal sources (% of total) 326
Electricity production from natural gas sources (% of total) 327
Electricity production from hydroelectric sources (% of total) 328
Electricity production from nuclear sources (% of total) 328
Electricity production from oil sources (% of total) 329
Energy imports, net (% of energy use) 337
Fossil fuel energy consumption (% of total) 346
Individuals using the Internet (% of population) 357
Fixed telephone subscriptions (per 100 people) 375
12
Electricity 143
Mobile-cellular telephone subscriptions 144
Transport infrastructure 146
Total population using basic sanitation services (%) 163
2.5 Environment
Sustainability 48
Ecological footprint of consumption per person (gha per person) 161
Environmental Health Policy Objective 113
Environmental Performance Index 114
The Region of the Country 270
Percentage of desert in 2012 88
Average distance to nearest ice-free coast (1000 km) in 2012 89
Percentage of tropical climate in 2012 89
The Ocean Health Index 291
Environmental Policy Performance Index 256
Environmental Policy Performance - Environment 256
Environmental Policy Performance - Global Environmental Protection 257
Arable land (% of land area) 317
Land area (sq. km) 318
CO2 emissions (metric tons per capita) 322
Forest area (% of land area) 346
Fossil fuel energy consumption (% of total) 346
Internally displaced persons, new displacement-disasters (number) 354
2.7 Health
2.8 History
2.9 Judicial
Associational/Assembly Rights 28
Civil Rights 33
Freedom of Expression 37
Independent Judiciary 38
Rule of Law 43
Comparative Abortion Index 2 (0 to 1) 283
Corruption Commission Present in Constitution 59
Limits on Child Work in Constitution 60
Equality Before the Law Mentioned in Constitution 61
Freedom of Religion in Constitution 62
Status of Slavery in Constitution 62
Right to Strike in Constitution 63
Freedom of Assembly and Association 276
Freedom of Domestic Movement 277
Freedom of Foreign Movement 278
Independence of the Judiciary 278
Physical Integrity Rights 279
Political Imprisonment 280
Freedom of Speech 280
Torture 281
Court system as a Major Constraint 111
Trust in Legal System 119
Trust in Police 122
Associational and Organizational Rights 130
Civil Liberties 130
Freedom of Expression and Belief 132
Personal Autonomy and Individual Rights 133
Political Rights 134
14
Rule of Law 135
Corruption Perception-Judges: Most (% respondents) 151
Corruption Perception-Police: Most (% respondents) 154
Independent Judiciary 234
Constitutional Court 185
Rule of Law, Estimate 301
Intentional homicides (per 100,000 people) 353
Organized crime 145
Absence of Corruption 241
Civil Justice 242
Civil Justice is Free of Corruption 242
Criminal Justice 243
Criminal System is Free of Corruption 244
Executive Branch do not use Public Office for Private Gain 244
Constraints on Government Powers 245
Judicial Branch do not use Public Office for Private Gain 246
Legislative branch do not use Public Office for Private Gain 246
Order and Security 247
Police and the Military do not use Public Office for Private Gain 248
Confidence: Justice System/Courts 193
Confidence: The Police 196
15
2.11 Media
Freedom of Expression 37
E-Government Index 302
Freedom of Expression and Belief 132
Freedom on the Net: Score 139
Freedom on the Net: Status 140
Freedom of the Press, Score (2001-2016) 137
Freedom of the Press, Status (2001-2016) 138
Media Bias before Election 224
Press Freedom Index 386
Media corrupt 308
Confidence: The Press 197
Confidence: Television 198
2.12 Migration
Private Property 42
Socio-Economic Barriers 45
Bribery Depth 110
Corruption as a Major Constraint 111
Freedom to Trade Internationally (current) 100
Economic Freedom of the World Index (current) 101
Corruption Perception-Business Executives: Most (% respondents) 150
Business Environment 176
The Property Right Protection Index 296
New business density (new registrations per 1,000 people ages 15-64) 322
Firms with female top manager (% of firms) 344
Firms expected to give gifts in meetings w. tax officials (% of firms) 345
Informal payments to public officials (% of firms) 356
Innovation capability 142
Global Competitiveness Index 144
Property rights 146
Satisfaction with financial situation of household 207
18
2.16 Public Economy
19
Corruption Commission Present in Constitution 59
Number of awarded contracts above 130,000 EUR 86
State Fragility Index 250
E-Government Index 302
Bribery Depth 110
Corruption as a Major Constraint 111
Court system as a Major Constraint 111
Functioning of Government 132
Personal Autonomy and Individual Rights 133
Political Rights 134
Total bribery rate, total population 148
Fight aganist corruption: Well (% respondents) 149
Feel personally obliged to report corruption: Agree (% respondents) 150
Corruption Perception-Business Executives: Most (% respondents) 150
Corruption Perception-Judges: Most (% respondents) 151
Corruption Perception-Local Gov Council: Most (% respondents) 152
Corruption Perception-Legislature: Most (% respondents) 152
Corruption Perception Change: Increase (% respondents) 153
Corruption Perception-Head of State: Most (% respondents) 154
Corruption Perception-Police: Most (% respondents) 154
Corruption Perception-Religious Leaders: Most (% respondents) 155
Corruption Perception-Tax officers: Most (% respondents) 156
Can people fight aganist corruption: agree (% respondents) 156
Is it socially acceptable to report corruption: agree (% respondents) 157
Would spend a whole day in court to give evidence: agree (% respondents) 158
Total Data Governance Score 159
Level of Democracy (Freedom House/Imputed Polity) 269
Information Capacity 182
ICRG Indicator of Quality of Government 289
Overall Governance 178
Security and Rule of Law 180
The Property Right Protection Index 296
Corruption Perceptions Index 84
Political corruption index 304
Media corrupt 308
Control of Corruption, Estimate 298
Government Effectiveness, Estimate 299
Bribery incidence (% of firms experiencing at least one bribe request) 320
Firms expected to give gifts in meetings w. tax officials (% of firms) 345
Informal payments to public officials (% of firms) 356
CPIA transparency-accountability-corruption in public sector rating (1-6) 374
2.18 Religion
20
2.19 Welfare
21
3 Identification Variables
Numeric country code based on the ISO-3166-1 standard. All the numeric country codes are unique
and this is thus the variable best suitable to use when merging files (in combination with year for
time-series data). (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-1_numeric)
A three-letter country code based on the ISO-3166-1 alpha3 standard. Please note that the ccodealp
variable does not uniquely identify all countries.
Country code from the World Bank. The World Bank bases its alphabetic codes on ISO’s.
22
3.0.11 year Year
Year.
23
4 Description of Variables by Original Data Source
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Geddes, B., Wright, J., & Frantz, E. (2014). Autocratic breakdown and regime transitions: A
new data set. Perspectives on Politics, 12 (2), 313–331
When the leader of an autocratic regime loses power, one of three things happens: 1. The incumbent
leadership group is replaced by democratically elected leaders. 2. Someone from the incumbent
leadership group replaces him, and the regime persists. 3. the incumbent leadership group loses
control to a different group, replacing it with a new autocracy. Much scholarship exists on the first
kind of transition, but little on transitions from one autocracy to another, though they make up about
half of all regime changes.
This dataset facilitates the investigation of all three kinds of transition. It provides transition infor-
mation for the 280 autocratic regimes in existence from 1946 to 2010. The data identify how regimes
exit power, how much violence occurs during transitions, and whether the regimes that precede and
succeed them are autocratic.
1. Indirect military
2. Military
3. Military-Personal
4. Monarchy
5. Oligarchy
6. Party
7. Party-Military
8. Party-Military-Personal
9. Party-Personal
24
10. Personal
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
25
4.2 Autocratic Regime Data: Autocratic Regimes
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Geddes, B., Wright, J., & Frantz, E. (2014). Autocratic breakdown and regime transitions: A
new data set. Perspectives on Politics, 12 (2), 313–331
When the leader of an autocratic regime loses power, one of three things happens. The incumbent
leadership group is replaced by democratically elected leaders. Someone from the incumbent leader-
ship group replaces them, and the regime persists. Or the incumbent leadership group loses control
to a different group that replaces it with a new autocracy. The dataset facilitates the investigation
of all three kinds of transition. The data identify how regimes exit power, how much violence occurs
during transitions, and whether the regimes that precede and succeed them are autocratic. The data
identify autocratic regime breakdowns regardless of whether the country democratizes, which makes
possible the investigation of why the ouster of dictators sometimes leads to democracy but often does
not, and many other questions.
1. Monarchy
2. Personal
3. Military
4. Party
5. Party-Personal
6. Party-Military
7. Military-Personal
8. Party-Personal-Military
9. Oligarchy
26
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
27
4.3 Bertelsmann Transformation Index
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Donner, S., Hartmann, H., Härterich, C., & Steinkamp, S. (2022). Transformation index of the
bertelsmann stiftung 2022. Bertelsmann Stiftung. http://www.bti-project.org
The Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) analyzes and evaluates the quality of democ-
racy, a market economy, and political management in 137 developing and transition countries. It
measures successes and setbacks on the path towards democracy based on the rule of law and a
socially responsible market economy.
In-depth country reports provide the basis for assessing the state of transformation and persistent
challenges and for evaluating the ability of policymakers to carry out consistent and targeted reforms.
The BTI is the first cross-national comparative index that collects data to comprehensively measure
the quality of governance during processes of transition.
To what extent can individuals form and join independent political or civic groups? To what ex-
tent can these groups operate and assemble freely? From 1 to 10.
1. Association and assembly rights are denied. Independent civic groups do not exist or are prohibited.
4. Association and assembly rights are severely limited. Oppositional political groups with any rele-
vance are prohibited or systematically disabled. Independent civic groups can operate and assemble
if they support the regime or are not outspokenly critical of it.
7. Association and assembly rights are partially limited, but generally there are no outright prohibi-
tions of independent political or civic groups.
10. Association and assembly rights are unrestricted for individuals and independent political or civic
groups within the basic democratic order.
28
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
To what extent does the government successfully contain corruption? From 1 to 10.
1. The government fails to contain corruption, and there are no integrity mechanisms in place.
4. The government is only partly willing and able to contain corruption, while the few integrity
mechanisms implemented are mostly ineffective.
7. The government is often successful in containing corruption. Most integrity mechanisms are in
place, but some are functioning only with limited effectiveness.
10. The government is successful in containing corruption, and all integrity mechanisms are in place
and effective.
29
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
How strong is the citizens’ approval of democratic norms and procedures? From 1 to 10.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
To what extent are democratic institutions accepted as legitimate by the relevant actors? From
1 to 10.
4. Only individual institutions are accepted, while influential actors hold vetoes. Acceptance remains
unstable over time.
30
7. Most democratic institutions are accepted as legitimate by most relevant actors.
10. All democratic institutions are accepted as legitimate by all relevant actors.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
How serious are social, ethnic, and religious conflicts? From 1 to 10.
4. There are only a few violent incidents. Radical political actors have limited success in mobilizing
along existing cleavages. Society and the political elite, however, are divided along social, ethnic, or
religious lines.
7. There are violent incidents. Mobilized groups and protest movements dominate politics. Society
and the political elite are deeply split into social classes, ethnic or religious communities.
10. There is a civil war or a widespread violent conflict based on social, ethnic, or religious differences.
31
Available in Cross-section Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
There are institutional or political precautions to achieve monetary and fiscal stability. Including
’To what extent does the monetary authority pursue and communicate a consistent monetary stabi-
lization policy?’ and ’To what extent do the government’s budgetary policies support fiscal stability?’
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
32
4.3.7 Civil Rights
To what extent are civil rights guaranteed and protected, and to what extent can citizens seek
redress for violations of these rights? From 1 to 10.
1. Civil rights are not guaranteed, and are frequently violated. There are no mechanisms and
institutions to protect citizens against violations of their rights.
4. Civil rights are guaranteed only within limited enclaves or are violated over protracted periods of
time. Some mechanisms and institutions to prosecute, punish and redress violations of civil rights
are established formally but do not function.
7. Civil rights are guaranteed but are partially or temporarily violated or are not protected in some
parts of the country. Mechanisms and institutions to prosecute, punish and redress violations of civil
rights are in place but often prove to be ineffective.
10. Civil rights are guaranteed by the constitution and respected by all state institutions. Infringe-
ments present an extreme exception. Citizens are effectively protected by mechanisms and institutions
established to prosecute, punish and redress violations of their rights.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
33
4.3.8 Democracy Status
Democracy Status: The state of democracy is measured in terms of five criteria; including state-
ness, political participation, rule of law, stability of the democratic institutions, and political and
social integration. From 1 to 10.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
1. Equality of opportunity is not achieved. Women and/or members of ethnic or religious groups have
only very limited access to education, public office, and employment. There are no legal provisions
against discrimination.
4. Equality of opportunity is only partially achieved. Women and/or members of ethnic, religious,
and other groups have limited access to education, public office, and employment. There are some
legal provisions against discrimination, but their implementation is highly deficient.
7. Equality of opportunity is largely achieved. Women and members of ethnic or religious groups
have near-equal access to education, public office, and employment. There are a number of legal
provisions against discrimination, but their implementation is at times insufficient.
10. Equality of opportunity is achieved. Women and members of ethnic or religious groups have equal
access to education, public office, and employment. There is a comprehensive and effective legal and
institutional framework for the protection against discrimination.
34
Type of variable: Categorical
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
How does the economy, as measured in quantitative indicators, perform? From 1 to 10.
1. The economic performance is very poor. Strongly negative macroeconomic data may include
negative GDP growth rates, very high unemployment levels, high inflation, large budget deficits,
unreasonably high debt and an increasingly unsustainable current account position.
4. The economic performance is poor. Continuing negative macroeconomic data may include stagnant
GDP levels, relatively high unemployment levels, low price stability, an unbalanced budget, rising
debt and a volatile current account position.
7. The economic performance is good. Moderately positive macroeconomic data may include low
GDP growth rates, only moderate unemployment levels, relative price stability, a slightly unbalanced
budget, a tendency toward debt and a manageable current account position.
10. The economic performance is very good. Positive macroeconomic data may include relatively
high GDP growth rates, relatively high employment levels, price stability, balanced budget, reasonable
debt and a sustainable current account position.
35
Available in Cross-section Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Economic Performance: The economy’s performance points to solid development. From 1 to 10.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
36
4.3.12 Free and Fair Elections
To what extent are political representatives determined by general, free and fair elections? From
1 to 10.
4. General, multi-party elections are held, conducted properly and accepted as the means of filling
political posts. However, there are some constraints on the fairness of the elections with regard to
registration, campaigning or media access.
7. General elections are held, but serious irregularities during voting process and ballot count occur.
The rights to vote, campaign and run for office are restricted, and elections have de facto only limited
influence over who governs.
10. National elections, if held at all, are entirely unfree and unfair.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
To what extent can citizens, organizations, and the mass media express opinions freely? From 1
to 10.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
4. The independence of the judiciary is heavily impaired by political authorities and high levels of
corruption. It is to some extent institutionally differentiated, but severely restricted by functional
deficits, insufficient territorial operability and scarce resources.
7. The judiciary is largely independent, even though occasionally its decisions are subordinated to
political authorities or influenced by corruption. It is institutionally differentiated, but partially
restricted by insufficient territorial or functional operability.
10. The judiciary is independent and free both from unconstitutional intervention by other institutions
and from corruption. It is institutionally differentiated, and there are mechanisms for judicial review
of legislative or executive acts.
38
Available in Cross-section Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Economy Status: It groups the scores of the level of socioeconomic development, the organization of
the market and competition, currency and price stability, private property, the welfare regime, the
economic performance, and sustainability. From 1 to 10. Higher scores reflect advanced economy
status.
39
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
To what extent does the state’s monopoly on the use of force cover the entire territory of the country?
From 1 to 10.
4. The state’s monopoly on the use of force is established only in key parts of the country. Large
areas of the country are controlled by guerrillas, paramilitaries or clans.
7. The state’s monopoly on the use of force is established nationwide in principle, but it is challenged
by guerrillas, mafias or clans in territorial enclaves.
10. There is no competition with the state’s monopoly on the use of force throughout the entire
territory.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
7. Democratic institutions perform their functions in principle, but often are inefficient due to friction
between institutions.
10. The ensemble of democratic institutions is effective and efficient. As a rule, political decisions are
prepared, made, implemented, and reviewed in legitimate procedures by the appropriate authorities.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Political Participation: The populace decides who rules, and it has other political freedoms. From 1
to 10. Higher scores refer to better conditions of political participation and other political freedoms.
41
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
There are adequate conditions to support a functional private sector. Including ’To what extent
do government authorities ensure well-defined rights of private property and regulate the acquisi-
tion, benefits, use and sale of property?’ and ’To what extent are private companies permitted and
protected? Are privatization processes conducted in a manner consistent with market principles?’.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
42
4.3.20 Party System
To what extent is there a stable and socially rooted party system able to articulate and aggregate
societal interests? From 1 to 10.
4. The party system is unstable with shallow roots in society: high fragmentation, high voter volatility,
and high polarization.
7. The party system is fairly stable and socially rooted: moderate fragmentation, moderate voter
volatility, and moderate polarization.
10. The party system is stable and socially rooted: it is able to articulate and aggregate societal
interest with low fragmentation, low voter volatility and low polarization.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Rule of Law: State powers check and balance one another and ensure civil rights. Including ’To
what extent is there a working separation of powers (checks and balances)’, ’To what extent does
an independent judiciary exist?’, ’To what extent are public officeholders who abuse their positions
prosecuted or penalized?’ and ’To what extent are civil rights guaranteed and protected, and to what
extent can citizens seek redress for violations of these rights?’.
43
Type of variable: Continuous
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Stability of Democratic Institutions: Democratic institutions are capable of performing, and they
are adequately accepted as legitimate. From 1 to 10.
44
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
To what extent are significant parts of the population fundamentally excluded from society due
to poverty and inequality? From 1 to 10.
10. Poverty and inequality are minor and not structurally ingrained.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Socio-Economic Level: In principle, the country’s level of development permits an adequate free-
dom of choice for all citizens. From 1 to 10. Higher scores are present for countries with better
socio-economic levels.
45
Type of variable: Discrete
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
To what extent is there a working separation of powers (checks and balances)? From 1 to 10.
4. One branch, generally the executive, has an ongoing and either informally or formally confirmed
monopoly on power, which may include the colonization of other powers, even though they are
institutionally differentiated.
7. The separation of powers generally is in place and functioning. Partial or temporary restrictions
of checks and balances occur, but a restoration of balance is sought.
10. There is a clear separation of powers with mutual checks and balances.
46
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
To what extent do social safety nets provide compensation for social risks? From 1 to 10.
1. Social safety nets do not exist. Poverty is combated hardly at all, or only ad hoc.
4. Social safety nets are rudimentary and cover only few risks for a limited number of beneficiaries.
The majority of the population is at risk of poverty.
7. Social safety nets are well developed, but do not cover all risks for all strata of the population. A
significant part of the population is still at risk of poverty.
10. Social safety nets are comprehensive and compensate for social risks, especially nationwide health
care and a well-focused prevention of poverty.
47
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
4.3.27 Sustainability
Economic growth is balanced, environmentally sustainable and future-oriented. Including ’To what
extent are environmental concerns effectively taken into account?’ and ’To what extent are there solid
institutions for basic, secondary and tertiary education, as well as for research and development?’.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Welfare Regime: Assesses whether there are available arrangements to compensate for social risks.
From 1 to 10. Including ’To what extent do social safety nets provide compensation for social risks?’
and ’To what extent does equality of opportunity exist?’.
48
Available in Cross-section Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
49
4.4 Boix-Miller-Rosato Dichotomous Coding of Democracy, 1800-2020
Boix, C., Miller, M. K., & Rosato, S. (2022). Boix-miller-rosato dichotomous coding of democ-
racy, 1800-2020 [UNF:6:6u8JNSHqP+yYKbLzrgFDug== [fileUNF]]. Harvard Dataverse, V1.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/FENWWR
Boix, C., Miller, M. K., & Rosato, S. (2013). A complete data set of political regimes, 1800-2007.
Comparative Political Studies, 46 (12), 1523–54
This data set provides a dichotomous coding of democracy from 1800 until 2020; however, QoG
data contains information from 1946 onwards. Authors define a country as democratic if it satisfies
conditions for both contestation and participation. Specifically, democracies feature political leaders
chosen through free and fair elections and satisfy a threshold value of suffrage.
50
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
51
4.5 COVID-19 Data Repository
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Ensheng, D., Du, H., & Gardner, L. (2020). An interactive web-based dashboard to track covid-
19 in real time. The Lancet, 20 (5), 533–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30120-1
The data repository for the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Visual Dashboard operated by the Johns Hop-
kins University Center for Systems Science and Engineering (JHU CSSE). Also, Supported by ESRI
Living Atlas Team and the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab (JHU APL).
Available in Cross-section
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
52
4.5.2 Number of COVID-19 deaths reported
This is the number of reported deaths due to COVID-19 during the year.
Available in Cross-section
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
53
4.6 CSES datasets
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. (2018). CSES MODULE 4 full release [dataset],
may 29, 2018 version. https://doi.org/doi:10.7804/cses.module4.2018-05-29
The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. (2015c). CSES MODULE 3 full release [dataset],
december 15, 2015 version. https://doi.org/doi:10.7804/cses.module3.2015-12-15
The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. (2022). CSES MODULE 5 full release [dataset],
march 1, 2022 version. https://doi.org/doi:10.7804/cses.module4.2020-05-14
The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. (2015b). CSES MODULE 2 full release [dataset],
december 15, 2015 version. https://doi.org/doi:10.7804/cses.module2.2015-12-15
The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. (2015a). CSES MODULE 1 full release [dataset],
december 15, 2015 version. https://doi.org/doi:10.7804/cses.module1.2015-12-15
CSES (CSES1, CSES2, CSES3, CSES4, and CSES5) is a collaborative program of research among
election study teams from around the world. Participating countries include a common module of
survey questions in their post-election studies. The resulting data are deposited along with voting,
demographic, district, and macro variables. The studies are then merged into a single, free, public
dataset for use in comparative study and cross-level analysis. The research agenda, questionnaires,
and study design are developed by an international committee of leading scholars of electoral politics
and political science. The design is implemented in each country by their foremost social scientists.
Note: Portugal 2002 from the initial data Module 1 was excluded, as this module provides data until
2001, therefore these observations are coded incorrectly.
Do you usually think of yourself as close to any particular party? Share of the population who
answered Yes.
Note: Refused to answer, Don’t know and similar answers were coded as missing, and the average
are based on the remaining answers.
54
Available in Cross-section Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
On the whole, are you very satisfied, fairly satisfied, not very satisfied, or not at all satisfied with the
way democracy works in [COUNTRY]?
3. Fairly satisfied.
4. Very satisfied.
Note: Refused to answer, Don’t know and similar answers were coded as missing, and the average
are based on the remaining answers.
55
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
56
4.7 Central Bank Independence Dataset
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Garriga, A. C. (2016). Central bank independence in the world: A new dataset. International
Interactions, 42 (5), 849–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2016.1188813
The Central Bank Independence Dataset is the most comprehensive data set on de jure central bank
independence (CBI) available to date. The data set identifies statutory reforms affecting CBI, their
direction, and the attributes necessary to build the Cukierman, Webb, and Neyapti (1992) (CWN)
index in 185 countries between 1970 and 2012. This is the version 2 of the dataset originally published
in Garriga (2016) and includes new observations and corrections based on legislation retrieved after
the publication of the original dataset.
This data set codes the existence of reforms in 6,845 observations and computes the CWN index for
6,192 observations. The data coverage not only allows researchers to test competing explanations on
the determinants and effects of CBI in both developed and developing countries, but it also provides
a useful instrument for cross-national studies in diverse fields.
CBI unweighted index: Raw average of the four components: Chief Executive Officer, Objectives,
Policy Formulation and Limitations on lending to the government. It ranges from 0 (minimum) to 1
(maximum) CBI.
Available in Time-series
57
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
CBI weighted index: Weighted average of the four components (weights between parentheses), fol-
lowing Cukierman, Webb and Neyapti’s (1992) criteria: Chief Executive Officer (0.20), Objectives
(0.15), Policy Formulation (0.15), and Limitations on lending to the government (0.5). It ranges from
0 (minimum) to 1 (maximum) CBI.
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
58
4.8 Characteristics of National Constitutions
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Elkins, Z., & Ginsburg, T. (2021). Characteristics of national constitutions, version 3.0 [Last
modified: May 20, 2021. Available at comparativeconstitutionsproject.org]. http : / / www .
comparativeconstitutionsproject.org
This dataset presents records of the characteristics of national constitutions written since 1789. Each
constitutional text is coded twice by different coders working independently. To maximize the reliabil-
ity of the final data, the discrepancies between these two codings are reconciled by a third individual
- a reconciler. This is the second public release of data (version 2.0) on the content of constitutions.
Authors rely on Ward and Gleditsch’s list to identify which countries are independent in a given year.
There are two concepts used to categorize constitutional texts; a constitutional system encompasses
the period in which a constitution is in force before it is replaced or suspended, and a constitutional
event is any change to a country’s constitution, including adoption, amendment, suspension, or re-
instatement. For years in which there are multiple events, the constitution is coded as it stood in
force at the end of the year. For example, if a constitution was amended the same year as it was
adopted, the content of the constitution is coded as amended rather than as originally adopted. In
addition, since events are (often) in force for multiple years, authors interpolated the data associated
to each event across all country-years in which that event was in force. Note that this is an extremely
conservative interpolation strategy because most constitutional amendments do not change many
provisions. As a result, for most variables, one can safely interpolate across constitutional systems.
1. Yes
2. No
96. Other
59
Available in Cross-section Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
1. Yes
2. No
96. Other
60
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Does the constitution refer to equality before the law, the equal rights of men, or non-discrimination?
1. Yes
2. No
96. Other
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
61
4.8.4 Freedom of Religion in Constitution
1. Yes
2. No
96. Other
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
1. Universally prohibited
96. Other
62
Type of variable: Categorical
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
1. Yes
3. No
96. Other
63
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
64
4.9 Classification of Political Regimes
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Cheibub, J. A., Gandhi, J., & Vreeland, J. R. (2010). Democracy and dictatorship revisited.
Public Choice, 143 (1-2), 67–101
4.9.1 Democracy
A regime is considered a democracy if the executive and the legislature is directly or indirectly elected
by popular vote, multiple parties are allowed, there is de facto existence of multiple parties outside
of regime front, there are multiple parties within the legislature, and there has been no consolidation
of incumbent advantage (e.g. unconstitutional closing of the lower house or extension of incumbent’s
term by postponing of subsequent elections). Transition years are coded as the regime that emerges
in that year.
0. No Democracy
1. Democracy
Available in Time-series
65
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
66
4.10 Comparative Political Data Set
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Armingeon, K., Engler, S., & Leemann, L. (2022). Comparative political data set 1960-2020
The Comparative Political Data Set 1960-2020 (CPDS) is a collection of political and institutional
data which have been assembled in the context of the research projects "Die Handlungsspielräume des
Nationalstaates" and "Critical junctures. An international comparison" directed by Klaus Armingeon
and funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation. This dataset consists of (mostly) annual data
for 36 democratic OECD and/or EU member countries for the period between 1960 to 2020. In all
countries, political data were collected only for the democratic periods. The dataset is suited for
cross-national, longitudinal, and pooled time-series analyses.
This dataset combines and replaces the earlier versions "Comparative Political Data Set I" (data for
23 OECD countries from 1960 onwards) and the "Comparative Political Data Set III" (data for 36
OECD and/or EU member states from 1990 onwards). A variable has been added to identify former
CPDS I countries.
Effective number of parties on the seats level according to the formula proposed by Laakso and
Taagepera (1979).
67
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Effective number of parties on the votes level according to the formula proposed by Laakso and
Taagepera (1979).
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
68
4.10.3 Share of seats in parliament: agrarian
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Share of seats in parliament for the political parties classified as electoral alliance.
69
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
70
Share of seats in parliament for the political parties classified as conservative.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
71
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
72
Share of seats in parliament for the political parties classified as green.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
73
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
74
Share of seats in parliament for the political parties classified as monarchist.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
75
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
76
Share of seats in parliament for the political parties classified as protest.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
77
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
78
Share of seats in parliament for the political parties classified as personalist.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
79
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
80
Share of seats in parliament for the political parties classified as religious.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Share of seats in parliament for the political parties classified as social democratic.
81
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
1. Single-party majority government: One party takes all government seats and has a parliamentary
majority.
2. Minimal winning coalition: All participating parties are necessary to form a majority government
[>50.0%].
3. Surplus coalition: Coalition governments that exceed the minimal-winning criterion [>50.0%].
4. Single-party minority government: The party in government does not possess a majority in Par-
liament [<50.0%].
5. Multi-party minority government: The parties in government do not possess a majority in Parlia-
ment [<50.0%].
6. Caretaker government: Governments that should simply maintain the status quo.
82
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
83
4.11 Corruption Perceptions Index
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Transparency International. (2023). Corruption perception index 2022 [Licensed under CC-BY-
ND 4.0]. http://www.transparency.org/cpi
The CPI focuses on corruption in the public sector and defines corruption as the abuse of public office
for private gain. The surveys used in compiling the CPI tend to ask questions in line with the misuse
of public power for private benefit, with a focus, for example, on bribe-taking by public officials in
public procurement. The sources do not distinguish between administrative and political corruption.
The CPI Score relates to perceptions of the degree of corruption as seen by business people, risk
analysts and the general public and ranges between 0 (highly corrupt) and 100 (highly clean).
Note: The time-series information in the CPI scores can only be used if interpreted with caution.
Year-to-year shifts in a country’s score can result not only from a changing perception of a country’s
performance but also from a changing sample and methodology. That is, with differing respondents
and slightly differing methodologies, a change in a country’s score may also relate to the fact that
different viewpoints have been collected and different questions have been asked. Moreover, each
country’s CPI score is composed as a 3-year moving average, implying that if changes occur they only
gradually affect a country’s score. For a more detailed discussion of comparability over time in the
CPI, see Lambsdorff 2005.
Note: In 2012 TI changed the methodology for which the data is not comparable and only data from
2012 and onwards can be compared.
Also, the observation "Belgium/Luxembourg" from the 1995 data has been dropped.
The Corruption Perception Index (2022) by Transparency International is licensed under CC-BY-ND
4.0.
Corruption Perceptions Index. Scale of 0-100 where 0 equals the highest level of perceived corruption
and 100 equals the lowest level of perceived corruption.
84
Available in Cross-section Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
85
4.12 Corruption Risks Indicators
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Fazekas, M., & Kocsis, G. (2020). Uncovering high-level corruption: Cross-national objective
corruption risk indicators using public procurement data. https : / / doi . org / doi : 10 . 1017 /
S0007123417000461
Measuring high-level corruption is subject to extensive scholarly and policy interest, which has
achieved moderate progress in the last decade. This dataset presents four objective proxy measures
of high-level corruption in public procurement: single bidding in competitive markets, the share of
contracts with "no published call for tender" red flag, the share of contracts with "non-open procedure"
red flag, and share of contracts with "tax haven" red flag.
Using official government data on 4 million contracts in thirty-two European countries from 2011 to
2021, the authors directly operationalize a common definition of corruption: unjustified restriction of
access to public contracts to favour a selected bidder.
Corruption indicators are calculated at the contract level, but produce aggregate indices consistent
with well-established country-level indicators, and are also validated by micro-level tests.
Number of successfully awarded contracts within tenders published on TED above 130k EUR thresh-
old.
86
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
87
4.13 Country Ruggedness and Geographical Data (2012)
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Nunn, N., & Puga, D. (2012). Ruggedness: The blessing of bad geography in Africa. Review of
Economics and Statistics, 94 (1), 20–36
The dataset of terrain ruggedness and other geographical characteristics of countries was created by
Nathan Nunn and Diego Puga for their article ’Ruggedness: The blessing of bad geography in Africa’,
published in the Review of Economics and Statistics 94(1), February 2012: 20-36.
The percentage of the land surface area of each country covered by sandy desert, dunes, rocky or
lava flows, was calculated on the basis of the desert layer of the Collins Bartholomew World Premium
digital map data (Collins Bartholomew, 2005) and the country boundaries described above. This was
initially computed as a cruder measure of soil (in)fertility for an early draft of the paper and is no
longer used in the final version. Nunn and Puga have left it in the dataset in case it is of use to other
researchers.
Available in Cross-section
88
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Average distance the to nearest ice-free coast (1000 km). To calculate the average distance to the
closest ice-free coast in each country, Nunn and Puga first compute the distance to the nearest ice-free
coast for every point in the country in equi-rectangular projection with standard parallels at 30 de-
grees, on the basis of sea and sea ice area features contained in the fifth edition of the Digital Chart of
the World (US National Imagery and Mapping Agency, 2000) and the country boundaries described
above. Then Nunn and Puga average this distance across all land in each country not covered by
inland water features. Units are thousands of kilometres.
Available in Cross-section
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Tropical climate. Using detailed temperature and precipitation data from the Climatic Research
Unit of the University of East Anglia and the Global Precipitation Climatology Centre of the Ger-
man Nunn and Pugaather Service, Kottek, Grieser, Beck, Rudolf, and Rubel (2006) classify each cell
on a 30 arc-minute grid covering the entire land area of the Earth into one of 31 climates in the
widely-used Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Based on these data and the country boundaries
described above, Nunn and Puga calculate the percentage of the land surface area of each country
that has any of the four Köppen-Geiger tropical climates.
89
Type of variable: Continuous
Available in Cross-section
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
90
4.14 Data on Central Bank Independence
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Romelli, D. (2022). The political economy of reforms in central bank design: Evidence from a
new dataset. Economic Policy, 37, 641–688. https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiac011
This dataset provides information on a comprehensive index of CBI covering a wide range of central
bank characteristics based on the charters of 154 central banks, over the period 19722017. The
construction of the index uses, as a starting point, the two most commonly employed CBI indices,
namely the Grilli et al. (1991) [GMT] and the Cukierman et al. (1992) [CWN]. This new index,
called CBI extended (CBIE) index, provides information on 42 criteria of central bank institutional
design across six dimensions: (1) governor and central bank board, (2) monetary policy and conflict
resolution, (3) objectives, (4) limitations on lending to the government, (5) financial independence
and (6) reporting and disclosure.
This extended index incorporates the characteristics of both the GMT and CWN indices. Moreover, it
expands the GMT political independence index by collecting additional information on the dismissal
of the governor and other board members, in addition to identifying if the governor is legally allowed
to hold other offices in the government. It also augments the GMT economic independence index by
including information on the authority responsible for setting the financial conditions on lending to the
government. Apart from integrating these two indices, one important innovation of the CBIE index
is the inclusion of new criteria that capture good practices in central bank financial independence
and reporting and disclosure.
In addition to the data on the CBIE index, this dataset also provides information on the various
subcomponents of the index, updated data on the Grilli et al. (1991), the Cukerman et al. (1992)
and the Jacome and Vazquez indices of CBI, as well as a dummy indicating whether the independence
of the central bank is entrenched in the constitution.
Average of the scores across these six dimensions of the index, i.e. the raw average of the four
components:
(3) objectives,
91
(6) reporting and disclosure.
The index ranges from 0 to 1 where 0 corresponds to the lowest level of independence to 1, the highest
level.
This extended index incorporates the characteristics of both the GMT and CWN indices and, includes
new criteria that capture good practices in central bank financial independence and reporting and
disclosure.
This index is in a scale from 0 to 1 where 1 indicates more central bank independence.
For more details about the construction of this index, please visit https://academic.oup.com/economicpolicy/article/37
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
92
4.15 Dataset for Information and Accountability Transparency (2014)
The article "A global index of information transparency and accountability" (Williams, 2014) uses a
relatively new methodology, similar to Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index,
to construct composite indicators of Informational Transparency, and Accountability. These new in-
dicators use data from 29 sources, with scores being derived annually between 1980 and 2010 across
more than 190 countries.
Transparency Index. Combined index of Information Transparency Index and Accountability Trans-
parency Index.
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
93
94
4.16 Democratic Electoral Systems Around the World 1946-2020
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Bormann, N.-C., & Golder, M. (2022). Democratic electoral systems around the world, 1946–
2020. Electoral Studies, Forthcoming
The data focus on national-level (lower house) legislative and presidential elections in democratic
regimes. Previously, the authors identified democratic regimes based on the Democracy-Dictatorship
(DD) classification scheme set out in Cheibub, Gandhi and Vreeland (2010). According to this
classification scheme, a regime is democratic if (i) the chief executive is elected, (ii) the legislature
is elected, (iii) there is more than one party competing in elections, and (iv) an alternation under
identical electoral rules has taken place (alternation rule). A regime is dictatorial if any of these
four conditions do not hold. While the 4.0 version of DES dataset continues to classify elections as
democratic according to these coding rules, it also classifies elections as democratic based on four
other commonly-used coding schemes as well: Boix-Miller-Rosato (BMR, 2012), Freedom House (FH,
2021), Polity5 (2020), and Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem, 2021).
Note: The original values of -99 (the information is missing but should theoretically be available) and
-88 (there is no single value for this particular variable) have been recoded to "." (missing).
95
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
This is a categorical variable that takes on one of three values indicating the basic type of electoral
system used in the elections.
1. Majoritarian
2. Proportional
3. Mixed
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
96
4.16.3 Electoral System Type-11 classes
This is a categorical variable that provides a more detailed indication of the type of electoral system
used in the election.
1. Single-Member-District-Plurality (SMDP)
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
97
4.16.4 Electoral Formula used in an Electoral Tier
This is a categorical variable that indicates the precise electoral formula used in an electoral tier.
1. Single-Member-District-Plurality (SMDP)
25. D’Hondt
26. Sainte-Laguë
Note: Users can find a detailed description of the difference between types in the original codebook.
98
Type of variable: Categorical
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
99
4.17 Economic Freedom of the World Dataset
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Gwartney, J., Lawson, R., Hall, J., & Murphy, R. (2022). Economic Freedom Dataset, pub-
lished in Economic Freedom of the World: 2022 Annual Report. Fraser Institute. https://www.
fraserinstitute.org/economic-freedom/dataset
The index published in Economic Freedom of the World measures the degree to which countries’
policies and institutions support economic freedom. The cornerstones of economic freedom are per-
sonal choice, voluntary exchange, freedom to enter markets and compete, and security of the person
and privately owned property. The EFW index now ranks 165 countries and territories. Data are
available for more than 100 nations and territories back to 1950. This dataset makes it possible for
scholars to analyze the impact of both cross-country differences in economic freedom and changes in
that freedom across a time frame of three and a half decades.
For a consistent time series for a particular country and/or longitudinal data for a panel of countries,
the Fraser Institute previously developed and reported a chain-linked version of the index. The EFW
Panel Dataset is now entirely based on the chain-linking method, having the base year as 2020, and
they will make the most recent years data the base year in the future.
in time are based only on changes in components that were present in adjoining
years. It should be noted that the EFW Panel Dataset contains area and summary
ratings only for those years in which the country received a regular EFW index
rating.
The index ranges from 0-10 where 0 corresponds to "increasing tax rate on international trade",
"slow import or export process", "small trade sectors relative to the population and geographic size",
"exchange rate controls are present and a black-market exists", and "restrictions on the freedom of
citizens to engage in capital market exchange with foreigners" and 10 corresponds to "no specific
taxes on international trade", "swift import or export process", "large trade sectors relative to the
population and geographic size", "no black-market exchange rate", and "no restrictions on the free-
dom of citizens to engage in capital market exchange with foreigners". The index consists of the
following indicators: Taxes on international trade, Regulatory trade barriers, Actual size of trade
sector compared to expected size, Difference between official exchange rate and black market rate,
and International capital market controls.
100
Type of variable: Continuous
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
The index is founded upon objective components that reflect the presence (or absence) of economic
freedom. The index comprises 21 components designed to identify the consistency of institutional
arrangements and policies with economic freedom in five major areas: size of government (fi_sog),
legal structure and security of property rights (fi_legprop), access to sound money (fi_sm), freedom
to trade internationally (fi_ftradeint), regulation of credit, labor and business (fi_reg). The index
ranges from 0-10 where 0 corresponds to "less economic freedom" and 10 to "more economic free-
dom". This is the version of the index published at the current year of measurement, without taking
methodological changes over time into account.
101
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
102
4.18 Educational Attainment Dataset
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Barro, R. J., & Lee, J. W. (2013). A new data set of educational attainment in the world,
1950–2010. Journal of Development Economics, 104, 184–198
Lee, J.-W., & Lee, H. (2016). Human capital in the long run. Journal of Development Eco-
nomics, 122, 147–169
The Barro-Lee Data set provides data dis-aggregated by sex and by 5-year age intervals. It provides
educational attainment data for 146 countries in 5-year intervals from 1950 to 2010. It also provides
information about the distribution of educational attainment of the adult population over age 15 and
over age 25 by sex at seven levels of schooling - no formal education, incomplete primary, complete
primary, lower secondary, upper secondary, incomplete tertiary, and complete tertiary. Average years
of schooling at all levels - primary, secondary, and tertiary - are also measured for each country and
for regions in the world.
This is the latest updated version of the Barro-Lee dataset reported in Barro and Lee (2013). Dr.
Hanol Lee, an associate professor at Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, has collab-
orated on the project.
The main aim of this new version is to construct estimates of educational attainment for the popula-
tion between 15 and 64 years old for the year of 2015. The estimates are disaggregated by gender and
by 10-year age group, whereas those in the original dataset were disaggregated by 5-year age group.
This is due to the limited availability of disaggregated statistics in the newly complied census/survey
data.
Available in Time-series
103
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
104
Average schooling years, females and males between 15 and 64 years old.
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
105
4.19 Electoral Integrity Project (Version 8.0)
Garnett, H. A., James, T. S., & MacGregor, M. (2022). Perceptions of Electoral Integrity, (PEI-
8.0) [V1, UNF:6:lINJ6KG6BcEwGIXz7tM4Yg== [fileUNF]]. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/
YSNYXD
This dataset by the Electoral Integrity Project evaluates the quality of elections held around the
world. Based on a rolling survey collecting the views of election experts, this research provides inde-
pendent and reliable evidence to compare whether countries meet international standards of electoral
integrity. PEI-8.0 cumulative release covers 480 national parliamentary and presidential contests held
worldwide in 169 countries from 1 July 2012 to 31 December 2021.
Overall how would you rate the integrity of this election on a scale from 1 (very poor) to 10 (very
good)?
Available in Cross-section
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
106
4.19.2 Perception of Electoral Integrity Index
The PEI index is designed to provide an overall summary evaluation of expert perceptions that
an election meets international standards and global norms. It is generated at the individual level
using experts’ answers to the 49 substantive variables below. Therefore, an Index score is missing if
an expert does not answer a question. The 49 scores are summed and then standardized to a 100
point scale.
Available in Cross-section
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
107
4.20 Electoral Systems and the Personal Vote
Johnson, J. W., & Wallack, J. S. (2012). Electoral systems and the personal vote. https :
//doi.org/1902.1/17901
This database updates and expands the coding of electoral systems presented in Gaviria et al.’s (2003)
Database of Particularism. Data now cover up to 180 countries from 1978-2005 and distinguish elec-
toral systems by the degree to which electoral institutions create incentives for candidates to cultivate
a personal vote - as described theoretically in Carey and Shugart (1995) and Gaviria et al. (2003) -
including the amount of vote pooling among co-partisan candidates, the amount of parties’ control
over ballot access, and whether voters cast their votes for candidates or parties. The database also
contains several variables that rank-order electoral systems by tier, distinguish mixed-member and
other multi-tier electoral systems, capture district magnitude (in two ways), and record election years.
Database created 2007. Database last updated 2010.
Available in Time-series
108
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
109
4.21 Enterprise Surveys
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
World Bank Enterprise Surveys offer an expansive array of economic data on 180,000 firms in 154
countries. The data is presented in a variety of ways useful to researchers, policy makers, journalists,
and others.
Business environment and performance indicators are created by computing weighted averages of
businesses responses to questions in the Enterprise Survey using sampling weights. Indicators are
displayed at the country level but can be viewed by firm subgroups in the original source.
The depth of Bribery is the percentage of instances in which a firm was either expected or requested
to provide a gift or informal payment during solicitations for public services, licenses or permits. This
measure uses data from 6 survey questions for each firm. For purposes of computation, a refusal to
answer a particular survey question is considered an affirmative answer.
Available in Cross-section
110
Overall country availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Available in Cross-section
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
111
Percent of firms identifying the court system as a major constraint.
Available in Cross-section
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
112
4.22 Environmental Performance Index Data 2022
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Wolf, M., W., E. J., C., E. D., de Sherbinin, A., & Wendling, e. a., Z. A. (2022). 2022 environ-
mental performance index [Date accessed: 17 October 2022]. New Haven, CT: Yale Center for
Environmental Law and Policy. epi.yale.edu
The Environmental Performance Index provides a ranking that shines light on how each country
manages environmental issues. The Environmental Performance Index (EPI) ranks how well countries
perform on high-priority environmental issues in two broad policy areas: protection of human health
from environmental harm and protection of ecosystems. Within these two policy objectives the
EPI scores country performance in 11 issue areas comprised of 32 indicators. Indicators in the EPI
measure how close countries are to meeting internationally established targets or, in the absence of
agreed-upon targets, how they compare to the range of observed countries.
Note: In many cases the EPI variables lack actual observations and rely on imputation. Please refer
to the original documentation on more information about this. Also, some values (usually the value
0) are very unlikely, please use your judgement whether to treat these as the value 0 or as "Data
missing".
The values on the EPI, Policy Objectives, and Issue Categories are not comparable over time, there-
fore, this compilation only includes data on these variables from the latest release. The raw data on
the 32 indicators, however, are comparable over time and, therefore, time-series are included.
Environmental Health Policy Objective measures how well countries are protecting their popula-
tions from environmental health risks. It comprises 40% of the total EPI score and consists of 4 issue
categories: Air Quality (50%), Sanitation and Drinking Water (40%), Heavy Metals (5%), and Waste
Management (5%). The policy objective varies from 0 to 100.
113
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
The 2020 Environmental Performance Index (EPI) scores 180 countries on 32 performance indi-
cators across 11 issue categories related to environmental health and ecosystem vitality. The 2020
EPI is a composite index. The EPI researchers begin by gathering data on 32 individual metrics of
environmental performance. These metrics are aggregated into a hierarchy beginning with 11 issue
categories: Air Quality, Sanitation and Drinking Water, Heavy Metals, Waste Management, Bio-
diversity and Habitat, Ecosystem Services, Fisheries, Climate Change, Pollution Emissions, Water
Resources, and Agriculture.
These issue categories are then combined into 2 policy objectives, Environmental Health and Ecosys-
tem Vitality, and then finally consolidated into the overall EPI. To allow for meaningful comparisons,
before aggregation the EPI researchers construct scores for each of the 32 indicators, placing them
onto a common scale where 0 indicates worst performance and 100 indicates best performance. How
far a country is from achieving international targets of sustainability determines its placement on this
scale.
Note: The EPI scores are not comparable over time, therefore, this dataset only includes the EPI
scores from the latest release.
114
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
115
4.23 European Social Survey - Wave 1-10
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
NSD - Norwegian Centre for Research Data. (2020). European social survey cumulative file, ess
1-9 [Date accessed: 17 February 2021]. https://doi.org/10.21338/NSD-ESS-CUMULATIVE
The European Social Survey (ESS) is an academically-driven multi-country survey, which has been
administered in over 30 countries to date. Its three aims are: first - to monitor and interpret chang-
ing public attitudes and values within Europe and to investigate how they interact with Europe’s
changing institutions; second - to advance and consolidate improved methods of cross-national survey
measurement in Europe and beyond; and third - to develop a series of European social indicators,
including attitudinal indicators.
This dataset includes two types of variables: 1) percentage of respondents choosing a particular
response option, and 2) average response per country, weighted using design weights (dweight), as
recommended by the ESS.
Taking all things together, how happy would you say you are?
0. Extremely Unhappy
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
116
Type of variable: Continuous
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
1. Very Good
2. Good
3. Fair
4. Bad
5. Very Bad
117
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
4.23.3 Religiosity
Regardless of whether you belong to a particular religion, how religious would you say you are?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
118
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Please tell me on a score of 0-10 how much you personally trust each of the institutions I read
out. 0 means you do not trust an institution at all, and 10 means you have complete trust. The Legal
System.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
119
4.23.5 Trust in Parliament
Please tell me on a score of 0-10 how much you personally trust each of the institutions I read
out. 0 means you do not trust an institution at all, and 10 means you have complete trust. The
Parliament.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Please tell me on a score of 0-10 how much you personally trust each of the institutions I read
out. 0 means you do not trust an institution at all, and 10 means you have complete trust. The
Political Parties.
120
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted, or that you can’t be too careful
in dealing with people? Please tell me on a score of 0 to 10, where 0 means you can’t be too careful
and 10 means that most people can be trusted.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
121
4.23.8 Trust in Police
Please tell me on a score of 0-10 how much you personally trust each of the institutions I read
out. 0 means you do not trust an institution at all, and 10 means you have complete trust. The
Police.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Please tell me on a score of 0-10 how much you personally trust each of the institutions I read
out. 0 means you do not trust an institution at all, and 10 means you have complete trust. The
Politicians.
122
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
123
4.24 Expanded Trade and GDP Data
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Gleditsch, K. S. (2002). Expanded trade and GDP data (version 6.0). Journal of Conflict Res-
olution, 46 (5), 712–724
Gleditsch, K., & Ward, M. D. (1999). Interstate system membership: A revised list of the
independent states since 1816. International Interactions, 25, 393–413
The dataset by Kristian Gleditsch provides estimates of trade flows between independent states (1948-
2000) and GDP per capita of independent states (1950-2011). Version 6. In order to fill in gaps in
the Penn World Table’s mark 5.6 and 6.2 data (see: Heston, Summers & Aten), Gleditsch has im-
puted missing data by using an alternative source of data (the CIA World Fact Book), and through
extrapolation beyond available time-series.
Available in Time-series
124
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
This amounts to the total export of a country, in millions of current year US dollars, estimated
as the sum of all dyadic export figures to that country using the imputation technique described
above.
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Real GDP (2005). This is Gleditsch’s estimate of GDP per Capita in US dollars at current year
international prices.
125
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
This amounts to the total import of a country, in millions of current year US dollars, estimated
as the sum of all dyadic import figures to that country using the imputation technique described
above.
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
126
4.24.5 Population (in the 1000’s)
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
This is the estimate of real GDP per Capita in constant US dollars at base year 2000, based on
the imputation technique described above.
Available in Time-series
127
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
This amounts to the sum of import and export of a country, in millions of current year US dollars,
estimated as the sum of all dyadic import and export figures of that country using the imputation
technique described above.
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
128
4.25 Freedom in the World
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Freedom House. (2022a). Freedom in the world 2022. https : / / freedomhouse . org / report /
freedom-world
Freedom in the World is an annual global report on political rights and civil liberties, composed
of numerical ratings and descriptive texts for each country and a select group of territories. The
2022 edition covers developments in 195 countries and 15 territories from January 1, 2021, through
December 31, 2021.
The report’s methodology is derived in large measure from the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1948. Freedom in the World is based on the premise
that these standards apply to all countries and territories, irrespective of geographical location, ethnic
or religious composition, or level of economic development. Freedom in the World operates from the
assumption that freedom for all people is best achieved in liberal democratic societies.
Freedom in the World assesses the real-world rights and freedoms enjoyed by individuals, rather than
governments or government performance per se. Political rights and civil liberties can be affected by
both state and non-state actors, including insurgents and other armed groups. To read more about
the methodology used by Freedom House, please visit https://freedomhouse.org/reports/freedom-
world/freedom-world-research-methodology. These subcategories, drawn from the Universal Declara-
tion of Human Rights, represent the fundamental components of freedom, which include an individ-
ual’s ability to:
- Enjoy personal freedoms, including free movement, the right to hold private property, social free-
doms, and equal access to economic opportunities.
Note: The 1982 edition of Freedom in the World covers the period Jan 1981 - Aug 1982 (=1981 in
our dataset). The 1983-84 edition covers the period Aug 1982 - Nov 1983 (=1983 in our dataset).
This leaves 1982 empty. For 1972, South Africa was in the original data rated as ’White’ (fh_cl: 3,
fh_pr: 2, fh_status: Free) and ’Black’ (fh_cl: 6, fh_pr: 5, fh_status: Not Free). We treat South
Africa 1972 as missing.
129
4.25.1 Associational and Organizational Rights
Associational and Organizational Rights - The variable evaluates the freedom of assembly, demonstra-
tions and open public discussion; the freedom for nongovernmental organizations; and the freedom
for trade unions, peasant organizations and other professional and private organizations. Countries
are graded between 0 (worst) and 12 (best).
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Civil Liberties Rating - Civil liberties allow for the freedoms of expression and belief, associational
and organizational rights, rule of law, and personal autonomy without interference from the state.
The more specific list of rights considered vary over the years. Countries are graded between 1 (most
free) and 7 (least free).
130
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Electoral Process - The variable measures to what extent the national legislative representatives
and the national chief authority are elected through free and fair elections. Countries are graded
between 0 (worst) and 12 (best).
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
131
4.25.4 Freedom of Expression and Belief
Freedom of Expression and Belief - The variable measures the freedom and independence of the
media and other cultural expressions; the freedom of religious groups to practice their faith and ex-
press themselves; the academic freedom and freedom from extensive political indoctrination in the
educational system; and the ability of the people to engage in private (political) discussions without
fear of harassment or arrest by the authorities. Countries are graded between 0 (worst) and 16 (best).
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Functioning of Government - The variable examines to what extent the freely elected head of gov-
ernment and a national legislative representative determine the policies of the government; if the
government is free from pervasive corruption; and if the government is accountable to the electorate
between elections and operates with openness and transparency. Countries are graded between 0
(worst) and 12 (best).
132
Available in Cross-section Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Personal Autonomy and Individual Rights - The variable evaluates the extent of state control over
travel, choice of residence, employment or institutions of higher education; the right of citizens to
own property and establish private businesses; the private business’ freedom from unduly influence
by government officials, security forces, political parties or organized crime; gender equality, freedom
of choice of marriage partners and size of family; equality of opportunity and absence of economic
exploitation. Countries are graded between 0 (worst) and 16 (best).
133
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Political Rights Rating - Political rights enable people to participate freely in the political process,
including the right to vote freely for distinct alternatives in legitimate elections, compete for public
office, join political parties and organizations, and elect representatives who have a decisive impact
on public policies and are accountable to the electorate. The specific list of rights considered varies
over the years. Countries are graded between 1 (most free) and 7 (least free).
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
134
4.25.8 Rule of Law
Rule of Law - The variable measures the independence of the judiciary; the extent to which rule
of law prevails in civil and criminal matters; the existence of direct civil control over the police; the
protection from political terror, unjustified imprisonment, exile and torture; absence of war and in-
surgencies; and the extent to which laws, policies and practices guarantee equal treatment of various
segments of the population. Countries are graded between 0 (worst) and 16 (best).
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
1. Free
2. Partly Free
3. Not Free
Until 2003, countries whose combined average ratings for Political Rights and Civil Liberties fell
between 1.0 and 2.5 were designated ’Free’; between 3.0 and 5.5 ’Partly Free’, and between 5.5 and
7.0 ’Not Free’. Since then, countries whose ratings average 1.0 to 2.5 are considered ’Free’, 3.0 to 5.0
’Partly Free’, and 5.5 to 7.0 ’Not Free’.
135
Available in Cross-section Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
136
4.26 Freedom of the Press
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Freedom of the Press, an annual report on media independence around the world, was published
between 1980 and 2017, and assessed the degree of print, broadcast, and digital media freedom in 199
countries and territories. It provided numerical scores and country narratives evaluating the legal
environment for the media, political pressures that influenced reporting, and economic factors that
affected access to news and information.
Note: The number in the variable names indicate what time period they refer to.
1: 1979-1987
2: 1988-1992
3: 1993-1995
4: 1996-2000
5: 2001-2016
Freedom of the Press, Score (2001-2016): The press freedom index is computed by adding four
component ratings: Laws and regulations, Political pressures and controls, Economic Influences and
Repressive actions. The scale ranges from 0 (most free) to 100 (least free).
137
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
1. Free
2. Partly Free
3. Not Free
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
138
4.27 Freedom on the Net
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Freedom House. (2022b). Freedom on the net 2022: Countering an authoritarian overhaul of
the internet. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom- net/2022/countering- authoritarian-
overhaul-internet
Freedom on the Net is a Freedom House project consisting of cutting-edge analysis, fact-based ad-
vocacy, and on-the-ground capacity building. It features a ranked, country-by-country assessment
of online freedom, a global overview of the latest developments, as well as in depth country reports.
Freedom on the Net measures the subtle and not-so-subtle ways that governments and non-state
actors around the world restrict our intrinsic rights online. Each country assessment includes a de-
tailed narrative report and numerical scores, based on methodology developed in consultation with
international experts. This methodology includes three categories:
1. Obstacles to Access details infrastructural and economic barriers to access, legal and ownership
control over internet service providers, and independence of regulatory bodies;
2. Limits on Content analyzes legal regulations on content, technical filtering and blocking of websites,
self-censorship, the vibrancy/diversity of online news media, and the use of digital tools for civic
mobilization;
3. Violations of User Rights tackles surveillance, privacy, and repercussions for online speech and
activities, such as imprisonment, extralegal harassment, or cyberattacks.
Freedom on the Net is a collaborative effort between a small team of Freedom House staff and an
extensive network of local researchers and advisors in 65 countries.
Freedom on the Net, Score: Measures the subtle and not-so-subtle ways that governments and non-
state actors around the world restrict our intrinsic rights online by looking at Obstacles to Access,
Limits on Content and Violations of User Rights. The scores are based on a scale of 0 to 100 with 0
representing the best level of freedom on the net progress and 100 the worst.
Please note that the values have changed from previous versions of QoG data given that Freedom
House now provides a document with the vlaues for all years and these are different for the first years
of the score.
139
Available in Cross-section Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
1. Free
2. Partly Free
3. Not Free
140
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
141
4.28 Global Competitiveness Report 2019
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
World Economic Forum. (2019). The global competetiveness report 2019 [Commercial use of
data produced by the World Economic Forum is forbidden]. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/
WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2019.pdf
The Global Competitiveness Index 4.0 assesses the competitiveness landscape of 140 economies, mea-
suring national competitiveness - defined as the set of institutions, policies and factors that determine
the level of productivity. The Report presents information and data that were compiled and/or col-
lected by the World Economic Forum organized into 12 pillars: Institutions, Infrastructure, ICT
adoption, Macroeconomic Stability, Health, Skills, Product Market, Labor Market, Financial Sys-
tem, Market Size, Business Dynamism, and Innovation Capabilities.
142
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
4.28.2 Electricity
Electricity (scale 1 to 100, while 100 is best). This indicator is calculated by the World Economic
Forum by aggregating two indicators that measure the electrification rate and electric power trans-
mission and distribution losses. For more information, write to [email protected].
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
143
4.28.3 Global Competitiveness Index
Global Competitiveness Index 4.0 (scale 1 to 100, while 100 is best). The Global Competitiveness
Index 4.0 assesses the microeconomic and macroeconomic foundations of national competitiveness,
which is defined as the set of institutions, policies, and factors that determine the level of productivity
of a country. Original sources: World Economic Forum, Global Competitiveness Report 2018
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Available in Cross-section
144
Overall country availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Organized crime (scale 1 to 7, while 7 is best). In your country, to what extent does organized crime
(mafia-oriented racketeering, extortion) impose costs on businesses? [1 = to a great extent-imposes
huge costs; 7 = not at all-imposes no costs] Original sources: World Economic Forum, Executive
Opinion Survey
Available in Cross-section
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
145
4.28.6 Property rights
Property rights (scale 1 to 7, while 7 is best). In your country, to what extent are property rights,
including financial assets, protected? [1 = not at all; 7 = to a great extent] Original sources: World
Economic Forum, Executive Opinion Survey
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Transport infrastructure (scale 1 to 100, while 100 is best). This indicator is calculated by the World
Economic Forum by aggregating eight indicators that measure roads, railroads, air transport and
water transport infrastructure. For more information, write to [email protected]. Original sources:
World Economic Forum, Global Competitiveness Report 2018
146
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Ratio of wage and salaried female workers to male workers. Ratio. The ratio of the percentage
of women aged 15-64 participating in the labour force as wage and salaried workers to the percentage
of men aged 15-64 participating in the labour force as wage and salaried workers. Original sources:
International Labour Organization (ILO), World Economic Forum
Available in Cross-section
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
147
4.29 Global Corruption Barometer
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
The Global Corruption Barometer is the only world wide public opinion survey about the views and
experiences of corruption.
The Global Corruption Barometer asks for people’s views on corruption in their country generally,
how the level of corruption has changed and in which institutions the problem of corruption is most
severe. It also provides a measure of people’s experience of bribery in the past year across six different
services. The survey asks people how well or badly they think their government has done at stopping
corruption.
For the 2015-2017 version all the values have been assigned the year 2016.
Note: Only valid answers are used when calculating the averages, "Unknown", "Don’t know" etc. are
excluded.
For the 2003-2013 version, the data for a country is marked as missing if there are less than 100
respondents per year, if there are 100 or more, the value corresponds to the mean of all answers.
Total bribery rates by country. Total Bribery rate, total population. In percentage.
Available in Cross-section
148
Overall country availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Percentage of respondents who answered ’Well’ to the following question: How well or badly would
you say the current government is handling the following matter: "fighting corruption in government"?
Available in Cross-section
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
149
4.29.3 Feel personally obliged to report corruption: Agree (% respondents)
Percentage of respondents who answered ’Agree’ to the following question: Would you agree or
disagree with the following statement: If I would witness an act of corruption, I would feel personally
obliged to report it.
Available in Cross-section
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Percentage of respondents who answered ’Most or All’ to the following question about Business
Executives: How many of the following people do you think are involved in corruption, or haven’t
you heard enough about them to say?
Available in Cross-section
150
Overall country availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Percentage of respondents who answered ’Most or All’ to the following question about Judges and
Magistrates: How many of the following people do you think are involved in corruption, or haven’t
you heard enough about them to say?
Available in Cross-section
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
151
4.29.6 Corruption Perception-Local Gov Council: Most (% respondents)
Percentage of respondents who answered ’Most or All’ to the following question about Local gov-
ernment councilors: How many of the following people do you think are involved in corruption, or
haven’t you heard enough about them to say?
Available in Cross-section
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Percentage of respondents who answered ’Most or All’ to the following question about the Mem-
bers of Parliament or Senators: How many of the following people do you think are involved in
corruption, or haven’t you heard enough about them to say?
Available in Cross-section
152
Overall country availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Percentage of respondents who answered ’increased’ to the following question: In your opinion, over
the past year, has the level of corruption in this country increased, decreased, or stayed the same?
Available in Cross-section
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
153
4.29.9 Corruption Perception-Head of State: Most (% respondents)
Percentage of respondents who answered ’Most or All’ to the following question about the Presi-
dent or Prime Minister and Officials in his office: How many of the following people do you think are
involved in corruption, or haven’t you heard enough about them to say?
Available in Cross-section
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Percentage of respondents who answered ’Most or All’ to the following question about the Police:
How many of the following people do you think are involved in corruption, or haven’t you heard
enough about them to say?
Available in Cross-section
154
Overall country availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Percentage of respondents who answered ’Most or All’ to the following question about Religious
Leaders: How many of the following people do you think are involved in corruption, or haven’t you
heard enough about them to say?
Available in Cross-section
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
155
4.29.12 Corruption Perception-Tax officers: Most (% respondents)
Percentage of respondents who answered ’Most or All’ to the following question about Tax Officials,
like Ministry of Finance officials or Local Government tax collectors: How many of the following
people do you think are involved in corruption, or haven’t you heard enough about them to say?
Available in Cross-section
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Percentage of respondents who answered ’Agree’ to the following question: Would you agree or
disagree with the following statement: Ordinary people can make a difference in the fight against
corruption.
Available in Cross-section
156
Overall country availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Percentage of respondents who answered ’Agree’ to the following question: Would you agree or
disagree with the following statement: In our society it is generally acceptable for people to report a
case of corruption they witness.
Available in Cross-section
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
157
4.29.15 Would spend a whole day in court to give evidence: agree (% respondents)
Percentage of respondents who answered ’Agree’ to the following question: Would you agree or
disagree with the following statement: I would report a case of corruption even if I would have to
spend a day in court to give evidence.
Available in Cross-section
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
158
4.30 Global Data Governance Mapping
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Struett, T., Zable, A., & Ariel, S. (2022). Global data governance mapping: Year two report.
https://globaldatagovernancemapping.org/images/DataGov-Year-2/year-two-mapping-report--
07-11-22-.pdf
The Digital Trade and Data Governance Hub seeks to help policymakers and the public understand
how governments around the world govern data.
Data governance, like the data-driven economy, is constantly evolving, reflecting changes in tech-
nology, society, and policymakers will and expertise. Consequently, data governance is a work in
progress and a different experience for all nations. Nations adopting a comprehensive approach de-
velop strategies, policies, and processes, adapt organizational structures and work to accommodate
different types and contexts for data use and re-use. Governments that can accommodate such change
in a responsive, competent, and anticipatory manner are likely to build and maintain trust in their
institutions.
This dataset divides data governance into six primary attributes: strategic, regulatory, responsible,
structural, participatory and international. These attributes can be thought of as the different di-
mensions of action a nation takes as it works to govern data in a comprehensive manner.
This variable scores countries based on the six attributes of data governance (strategic, regulatory,
responsible, structural, participatory and international). It is measured on a scale from 0-100
Available in Cross-section
159
Overall country availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
160
4.31 Global Footprint data
Global Footprint Network. (2019). National footprint and biocapacity accounts (1961-2016),
2019 edition [Date accessed: 21 October 2020]. https://data.footprintnetwork.org
The National Footprint and Biocapacity Accounts (NFAs) measure the ecological resource use and
resource capacity of nations over time. Based on approximately 15,000 data points per country per
year, the Accounts calculate the Footprints of more than 200 countries, territories, and regions from
1961 to the present, providing the core data needed for all Ecological Footprint analysis worldwide.
Total ecological footprint of consumption divided by the population size. Measured in global hectares
(gha) per person.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
161
4.32 Global Health Observatory data repository
World Health Organization. (2021). Global health observatory data repository [Accessed on
2021-11-29]. http://www.who.int/gho/en/
The GHO data repository is WHO’s gateway to health-related statistics for its 194 Member States.
It provides access to over 1000 indicators on priority health topics including mortality and burden of
diseases, the Millennium Development Goals (child nutrition, child health, maternal and reproductive
health, immunization, HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria, neglected diseases, water and sanitation),
non communicable diseases and risk factors, epidemic-prone diseases, health systems, environmental
health, violence and injuries, equity among others.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
162
4.32.2 Total population using basic sanitation services (%)
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
163
4.33 Global Militarization Index
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Bayer, Markus and Paul Rohleder. (2022). Global Militarization Index 2022. Bonn International
Center for Conversion BICC. https://gmi.bicc.de/
Compiled by BICC, the Global Militarization Index (GMI) presents on an annual basis the relative
weight and importance of a country’s military apparatus in relation to its society as a whole. The
GMI covers 153 countries and is based on the latest available figures (up to 2021). The index project
is financially supported by Germany’s Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Previously, the GMI reached back to the 1990s. Due to data reliability reasons, BICC decided to
take the older data offline.
The Global Militarization Index is divided into three overarching categories: expenditure, person-
nel and heavy weapons. (See variables bicc_milexp, bicc_milper, and bicc_hw).
In order to increase the compatibility between different indicators and preventing extreme values
from crating distortions when normalizing data, in a first step every indicator was represented in a
logarithm with the factor 10. Second, all data was normalized using the formula x=(y-min)/(max-
min), with min and max representing, respectively, the lowest and the highest value of the logarithm.
In a third step, every indicator was weighted in accordance to a subjective factor, reflecting the
relative importance attributed to it by BICC researchers. In order to calculate the final score, the
weighted indicators were added together and then normalized one last time on a scale ranging from
0 to 1,000. For better comparison of individual years, all years were finally normalized.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
165
4.34 Global Peace Index
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Institute for Economics and Peace. (2022b). Global peace index 2022: Measuring peace in a
complex world [Accessed 01-09-2022]. http://visionofhumanity.org/resources
The Global Peace Index (GPI), which ranks 163 independent states and territories according to their
level of peacefulness. Produced by the Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP), the GPI is the
world’s leading measure of global peacefulness. The complete version of the GPI covers 99.7 per
cent of the world’s population, using 23 qualitative and quantitative indicators from highly respected
sources, and measures the state of peace using three thematic domains: the level of Societal Safety and
Security; the extent of Ongoing Domestic and International Conflict; and the degree of Militarisation.
Please refer to the original source to see all of the indicators. For the QoG compilation data, we
assume the report refers to the data of the preceding year.
The GPI (scaled from 1 to 5, 5 being least peaceful) measures a country’s level of Negative Peace
using three domains of peacefulness. The first domain, Ongoing Domestic and International Conflict,
investigates the extent to which countries are involved in internal and external conflicts, as well as
their role and duration of involvement in conflicts.
The second domain evaluates the level of harmony or discord within a nation; ten indicators broadly
assess what might be described as Societal Safety and Security. The assertion is that low crime
rates, minimal terrorist activity and violent demonstrations, harmonious relations with neighbouring
countries, a stable political scene and a small proportion of the population being internally displaced
or made refugees can be equated with peacefulness.
Seven further indicators are related to a country’s Militarisation-reflecting the link between a country’s
level of military build-up and access to weapons and its level of peacefulness, both domestically and
internationally. Comparable data on military expenditure as a percentage of GDP and the number
of armed service officers per head are gauged, as are financial contributions to UN peacekeeping
missions.
166
Available in Cross-section Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
167
4.35 Global Terrorism Index
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Institute for Economics and Peace. (2022a). Global terrorism index 2022: Measuring the impact
of terrorism [Accessed 01-09-2022]. http://visionofhumanity.org/resources
The Global Terrorism Index (GTI) is a comprehensive study analysing the impact of terrorism for
163 countries covering 99.7 percent of the worlds population.
The GTI report is produced by the Institute for Economics & Peace (IEP) using data from Terrorism
Tracker and other sources. The GTI produces a composite score so as to provide an ordinal ranking
of countries on the impact of terrorism. The GTI scores each country on a scale from 0 to 10; where
0 represents no impact from terrorism and 10 represents the highest measurable impact of terrorism.
Given the significant resources committed to counter terrorism by governments across the world, it
is important to analyse and aggregate the available data to better understand its various properties.
One of the key aims of the GTI is to examine these trends. It also aims to help inform a positive,
practical debate about the future of terrorism and the required policy responses.
The global terrorism index is a composite measure made up of four indicators: incidents, fatali-
ties, injuries and property damage. To measure the impact of terrorism, a five year weighted average
is applied.
168
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
169
4.36 HRV Transparency Project
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Hollyer, J. R., Rosendorff, B. P., & Vreeland, J. R. (2014). Measuring transparency. Political
Analysis, 22 (4), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpu001
The HRV Transparency project examines the causes and consequences of government transparency
both through theoretical and empirical approaches with the measure of government transparency or
HRV Index. The HRV index contrasts with other measurements because it relies on a precise and
narrow conception of transparency: the disclosure of policy-relevant information by the government
to the public.
The HRV Index focuses on the availability of credible aggregate economic data. It does so by exam-
ining patterns of missing data and treating transparency as the latent term which best reflects the
tendency to disclose. This measure provides observations for 125 countries from 1980-2010 and can be
used to measure relationships between transparency and other issues such as democracy, accountabil-
ity, or political instability. Transparency encompasses many dimensions. The HRV index measures
a specific aspect of government transparency: reporting national data to international organizations.
Rather than rely on expert but subjective judgments, the measure is based on objective criteria. The
HRV team uses "Item Response Theory", a highly sophisticated and computationally intense method
to estimate transparency. This method assigns different weights for reporting distinct measures of the
economy, based on how many other countries actually reported data on the measure, and how much a
country distinguishes itself from other countries by reporting data on a given measure. (Technically,
the model estimates "difficulty" and "discrimination" parameters for each economic variable.)
The model analyzes 240 measures of the economy consistently collected by the World Bank’s World
Development Indicators. Since the World Bank obtains its data from other international agencies
that, in turn, obtain their data from national statistical offices, the HRV measure is a valid indica-
tor of governments’ efforts to collect and disseminate economically relevant information. Moreover,
because the World Bank omits data considered "questionable", this index reflects the collection and
dissemination of generally credible information about a country’s national economy.
The point estimate of the HRV index. The HRV transparency index measures the availability of
credible aggregate economic data that a country discloses to the public.
170
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
171
4.37 Human Development Report
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
United Nations Development Program. (2022b). Human development report 2021/2022. https:
//hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2021-22
The Human Development Report (HDR) is an annual report published by the Human Development
Report Office of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).
The entire series of Human Development Index (HDI) values and rankings are recalculated every year
using the most recent (revised) data and functional forms. The HDI rankings and values in the 2014
Human Development Report cannot therefore be compared directly to indices published in previous
Reports. Please see hdr.undp.org for more information.
The HDI was created to emphasize that people and their capabilities should be the ultimate criteria
for assessing the development of a country, not economic growth alone. The HDI can also be used to
question national policy choices, asking how two countries with the same level of GNI per capita can
end up with different human development outcomes.
The HDI was created to emphasize that people and their capabilities should be the ultimate cri-
teria for assessing the development of a country, not economic growth alone. The HDI can also be
used to question national policy choices, asking how two countries with the same level of GNI per
capita can end up with different human development outcomes. These contrasts can stimulate debate
about government policy priorities.
The Human Development Index (HDI) is a summary measure of average achievement in key di-
mensions of human development: a long and healthy life, being knowledgeable and having a decent
standard of living. The HDI is the geometric mean of normalized indices for each of the three dimen-
sions. The closer the score is to 1, the better the country is doing.
The health dimension is assessed by life expectancy at birth, the education dimension is measured
by mean of years of schooling for adults aged 25 years and more and expected years of schooling
for children of school entering age. The standard of living dimension is measured by gross national
income per capita. The HDI uses the logarithm of income, to reflect the diminishing importance of
income with increasing GNI. The scores for the three HDI dimension indices are then aggregated into
a composite index using geometric mean. Refer to Technical notes for more details.
The HDI simplifies and captures only part of what human development entails. It does not reflect
on inequalities, poverty, human security, empowerment, etc. The HDRO offers the other composite
indices as broader proxy on some of the key issues of human development, inequality, gender disparity
and human poverty.
172
Type of variable: Continuous
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
173
4.38 IMF GFS - Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG)
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
The IMF Government Finance Statistics (GFS) database contains fiscal data for all reporting coun-
tries in the framework of the Government Finance Statistics Manual 2014 (GFSM 2014). It includes
detailed data on revenues, expenditures, transactions in financial assets and liabilities, and balance
sheet data and includes data for the general government sector and its subsectors (e.g., central gov-
ernment, local government, state government and social security funds). GFS data are compiled by
country authorities and reported to the IMF Statistics Department annually.
The data reported in the QoG Datasets is retrieved from Expenditure by Function of Government
(COFOG) dataset, as the percentage of total expenditure by general government.
Please bear in mind, these data is produced and owned by the IMF, so please comply with their terms
of use when working with this dataset.
4.38.1 Expenditure on recreation, culture and religion (% of total gen. gov. exp.)
Total expenditure on recreation, culture and religion, as the percentage of general government ex-
penditure.
174
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
175
4.39 Ibrahim Index of African Governance
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
The Ibrahim Index of African Governance (IIAG) is a tool that measures and monitors governance
performance in African countries. The IIAG governance framework comprises four categories: Safety
& Rule of Law, Participation & Human Rights, Sustainable Economic Opportunity and Human De-
velopment. These categories are made up of 14 sub-categories, consisting of 100 indicators. The
IIAG is refined on an annual basis. Refinements may be methodological, or based on the inclusion or
exclusion of indicators. Different IIAG datasets are not comparable between themselves as they cover
a different ten-year period, data are revised retrospectively, and the theoretical framework is updated
between iterations. Users of the Index should therefore always reference the most recent version of
the IIAG dataset.
Business Environment is one of the four sub-categories that are used to calculate the Foundations for
Economic Opportunity category score. It consists of five indicators from five data sources.
176
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
4.39.2 Education
Education is one of the four sub-categories that are used to calculate the Human Development cate-
gory score. It consists of five indicators from seven data sources.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
177
4.39.3 Overall Governance
The Overall Governance score is calculated by aggregating the four categories: Security & Rule
of Law; Participation, Rights and Inclusion; Human Development and Foundations for Economic
Opportunity. These categories are made up of 16 sub-categories, consisting of 79 IIAG indicators,
from 40 data sources.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Human Development is one of the four categories that are used to calculate the Overall Governance
score. It consists of four sub-categories, made up of 21 indicators.
178
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
4.39.5 Health
Health is one of the four sub-categories that are used to calculate the Human Development cate-
gory score. It consists of six indicators from eight data sources.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
179
4.39.6 Infrastructure
Infrastructure is one of the four sub-categories that are used to calculate the Foundations for Economic
Opportunity category score. It consists of four indicators from four data sources.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Security & Rule of Law is one of the four categories that are used to calculate the Overall Gov-
ernance score. It consists of four sub-categories, made up of 21 indicators.
180
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
181
4.40 Information Capacity Dataset
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Brambor, T., Goenaga, A., Lindvall, J., & JanTeorell. (2020). The lay of the land: Information
capacity and the state. Comparative Political Studies, 53 (2), 175–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/
0010414019843432
The original Information Capacity Dataset offers numerical data on five institutions and policies that
modern states use to collect information about their populations and territories: (1) the regular im-
plementation of a reliable census, (2) the regular release of statistical yearbooks, the operation of
(3) civil and (4) population registers, and (5) the establishment of a government agency tasked with
processing statistical information. Based on these five indicators, an overall index of information
capacity is calculated for 85 polities from 1750 to 2015.
The aggregate index of information capacity. It is based on a hybrid two-parameter and graded
Item Response Model (IRT) that is based on five component indicators - when the country first
established a statistical agency, whether the country had in place a civil register and a population
register, and the graded indexes of census ability and yearbook ability.
Available in Time-series
182
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
183
4.41 Institutions and Elections Project Data
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Wig, T., Hegre, H., & Regan, P. M. (2015). Updated data on institutions and elections 1960–
2012: Presenting the iaep dataset version 2.0. Research & Politics, 2 (2). https://doi.org/10.
1177/2053168015579120
Institutions and Elections Project Data (version 2.0). The objective of the data from the Institutions
and Elections Project (IAEP) is to describe the formal institutions that are in place, even if practice
does not comport with those formal rules. The data refers to the situation January 1st each year.
Note: According to the documentation of the data many of the cases "have more than one executive;
[...] the executive referred to may be any one of the executives established in a country". We urge
users to refer to the documentation at the IAEP web site for information about which executive each
particular case refers to.
Note: Changes from the original version: The dataset has two types of missing values, logical missing
values and actual missing values. In the QoG data, logical missing values were recoded to actual
missing values. To access data with logical missing values please use original dataset.
0. No
1. Yes
Available in Time-series
184
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
According to the constitution, does the country have a national constitutional court? In some cases,
a council with the powers of a constitutional court may exist, though it may not be part of the formal
judiciary. In such cases, this non-judicial council with the powers of a constitutional court is coded
as the constitutional court.
0. No
1. Yes
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
185
4.41.3 Executive Power over Military Force
Does an executive have the power to use military force abroad without legislative approval?
0. No
1. Yes
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
2. Majority
3. Proportional representation
4. Mixed systems (combination of PR and either plurality or majority). This option includes situa-
tions in which a single chamber contains seats selected by different methods, or situations in which
186
all of the seats in a chamber are chosen with the same method, but each chamber is selected through
different methods.
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
0. No
1. Yes
Available in Time-series
187
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
This variable examines the relationship between the central and regional governments, those which
are immediately below the central government. We focus exclusively on states or provincial levels of
government, municipalities are not coded. Is the government structure a:
1. Unitary system
2. Confederation
3. Federal system
Available in Time-series
188
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
189
4.42 Integrated Values Surveys (WVS/EVS trend 1981-2022)
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
EVS. (2020). European Values Study 2017: Integrated Dataset (EVS 2017). https : / / doi .
org/10.4232/1.13560
Haerpfer, C., Inglehart, R., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., Lagos,
M., Norris, P., Ponarin, E., & et al., B. P. (2021). World Values Survey Time-Series (1981-2020)
Cross-National Data-Set: Data File Version 2.0.0. https://doi.org/10.14281/18241.15
Haerpfer, C., Inglehart, R., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., J., D.-M., M. Lagos, P. N.,
Ponarin, E., & B. Puranen, e. a. (2020). World Values Survey: Round Seven Country-Pooled
Datafile. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV7.jsp
The European Value Study (EVS) and the World Value Survey (WVS) are two large-scale, cross-
national, and repeated cross-sectional longitudinal survey research programs. Since their emergence
in the early 1980s, the EVS has conducted 5 survey waves (every 9 years), and the WVS has conducted
7 survey waves (every 5 years). Both research programs include a large number of questions, which
have been replicated over time and across the EVS and the WVS surveys. Such repeated questions
constitute the Integrated Values Surveys (IVS), the joint EVS-WVS time-series data, which at the
moment covers a 41-years period (1981-2022).
The variables are country averages calculated using the population weight provided by WVS/EVS.
I am going to name a number of organizations. For each one, could you tell me how much con-
fidence you have in them: Armed Forces
1. None at all
3. Quite a lot
4. A great deal
190
Available in Cross-section Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
I am going to name a number of organizations. For each one, could you tell me how much con-
fidence you have in them: Churches
1. None at all
3. Quite a lot
4. A great deal
191
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
I am going to name a number of organizations. For each one, could you tell me how much con-
fidence you have in them: The Civil Services
1. None at all
3. Quite a lot
4. A great deal
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
192
4.42.4 Confidence: The Government
I am going to name a number of organizations. For each one, could you tell me how much con-
fidence you have in them: The Government
1. None at all
3. Quite a lot
4. A great deal
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
I am going to name a number of organizations. For each one, could you tell me how much con-
fidence you have in them: Justice System/Courts
1. None at all
193
3. Quite a lot
4. A great deal
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
I am going to name a number of organizations. For each one, could you tell me how much con-
fidence you have in them: Labour Unions
1. None at all
3. Quite a lot
4. A great deal
194
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
I am going to name a number of organizations. For each one, could you tell me how much con-
fidence you have in them: Parliament
1. None at all
3. Quite a lot
4. A great deal
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
195
4.42.8 Confidence: The Police
I am going to name a number of organizations. For each one, could you tell me how much con-
fidence you have in them: The Police
1. None at all
3. Quite a lot
4. A great deal
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
I am going to name a number of organizations. For each one, could you tell me how much con-
fidence you have in them: The Political Parties
1. None at all
196
3. Quite a lot
4. A great deal
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
I am going to name a number of organizations. For each one, could you tell me how much con-
fidence you have in them: The Press
1. None at all
3. Quite a lot
4. A great deal
197
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
I am going to name a number of organizations. For each one, could you tell me how much con-
fidence you have in them: Television
1. None at all
3. Quite a lot
4. A great deal
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
198
4.42.12 Importance of democracy
Available in Cross-section
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
199
Available in Cross-section
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
0. No
1. Yes
200
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
3. Rather happy
4. Very happy
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
For each of the following, indicate how important it is in your life. Would you say it is: Religion
3. Rather important
201
4. Very important
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
202
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
I’m going to describe various types of political systems and ask what you think about each as a
way of governing this country: Having the army rule
1. Very bad
2. Fairly bad
3. Fairly good
4. Very good
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
203
4.42.19 Political system: Having a democratic political system
I’m going to describe various types of political systems and ask what you think about each as a
way of governing this country: Having a democratic political system
1. Very bad
2. Fairly bad
3. Fairly good
4. Very good
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
I’m going to describe various types of political systems and ask what you think about each as a
way of governing this country: Having experts, not government, make decisions according to what
they think is best for the country
1. Very bad
2. Fairly bad
204
3. Fairly good
4. Very good
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
I’m going to describe various types of political systems and ask what you think about each as a
way of governing this country: Having a strong leader who does not have to bother with parliament
and elections
1. Very bad
2. Fairly bad
3. Fairly good
4. Very good
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Please tell us if you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree with the following state-
ments: The only acceptable religion is my religion
1. Strongly disagree
2. Disagree
3. Agree
4. Strongly agree
Available in Cross-section
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
206
4.42.23 Satisfaction with financial situation of household
How satisfied are you with the financial situation of your household?
1. Completely dissatisfied
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
All in all, how would you describe your state of health these days? Would you say it is:
1. Poor
2. Fair
3. Good
4. Very good
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted or that you need to be very
careful in dealing with people?
208
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
209
4.43 Inter-Parliamentary Union Data
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
The data has been compiled by the Inter-Parliamentary Union on the basis of information provided by
National Parliaments. Comparative data on the world and regional averages as well as data concerning
the two regional parliamentary assemblies elected by direct suffrage can be found on separate pages.
Note: The figures for South Africa on the distribution of seats in the Upper House do not include the
36 special rotating delegates appointed on an ad hoc basis, and all percentages given are therefore
calculated on the basis of the 54 permanent seats. Included in the QoG Dataset are the data for
January each year.
210
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
211
4.44 KOF Index of Globalization
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Gygli, S., Haelg, F., Potrafke, N., & Sturm, J.-E. (2019). The KOF Globalisation Index - Revis-
ited. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2
Dreher, A. (2006). Does globalization affect growth? evidence from a new index of global-
ization. Applied Economics, 38 (10), 1091–1110
The KOF Globalization Index measures the economic, social and political dimensions of globalization.
It is used in order to monitor changes in the level of globalization of different countries over extended
periods of time. The current KOF Globalization Index is available for 190 countries and covers the
period from 1970 until 2022. A distinction is drawn between de facto and de jure for the Index as a
whole, as well as within the economic, social and political components.
The Index measures globalization on a scale of 1 to 100, where higher values indicate a higher degree
of globalization. The figures for the constituent variables are expressed as percentiles. This means
that outliers are smoothed and ensures that fluctuations over time are lower. Due to the new method-
ology, the current Index is only to a limited extent comparable to the old KOF Globalization Index.
Economic globalisation (scale of 1 to 100) covers both trade flows as well as financial flows. De
facto trade is determined with reference to the trade in goods and services. De jure trade covers
customs duties, taxes and restrictions on trade.
212
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
The overall index of globalization (scale of 1 to 100) is the weighted average of the following variables:
economic globalization, social globalization and political globalization (dr_eg, dr_sg and dr_pg).
Most weight has been given to economic followed by social globalization.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
213
4.44.3 Political Globalization
Political globalisation (scale of 1 to 100) regards the de facto segment measured with reference
to the number of embassies and international non-governmental organisations (NGOs), along with
partici-pation in UN peacekeeping missions. The de jure segment contains variables focussing on the
membership of international organisations and international treaties.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Social globalization (scale of 1 to 100) is comprised of three segments, each with its own de facto
and de jure segment. Interpersonal contact is measured within the de facto segment with reference
to international telephone connections, tourist numbers and migration. Within the de jure segment,
it is measured with reference to telephone subscriptions, international airports and visa restrictions.
Flows of information are determined within the de facto segment with reference to international
patent applications, international students and trade in high technology goods. The de jure segment
measures access to TV and the internet, freedom of the press and international internet connections.
Cultural proximity is measured in the de facto segment from trade in cultural goods, international
trademark registrations and the number of McDonalds restaurants and IKEA stores. The de jure area
focuses on civil rights (freedom of citizens), gender equality and public spending on school education.
214
Available in Cross-section Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
215
4.45 Luxembourg Income Study database and the Luxembourg Wealth
Study database
LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg. (2022). Lis inequality and poverty key figures
[Accessed on 2022-12-12]. https://www.lisdatacenter.org/download-key-figures/
LIS, formerly known as The Luxembourg Income Study, is a data archive and research center ded-
icated to cross-national analysis. LIS is home to two databases, the Luxembourg Income Study
Database, and the Luxembourg Wealth Study Database. The Luxembourg Income Study Database
(LIS), under constant expansion, is the largest available database of harmonised microdata collected
from multiple countries over a period of decades. The newer Luxembourg Wealth Study Database
(LWS), is the only cross-national wealth microdatabase in existence.
Gini Coefficient.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
216
217
4.46 Maddison Project Database 2020
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Bolt, J., & van Zanden, J. L. (2020). Maddison project database, version 2020 [Maddison style
estimates of the evolution of the world economy: A new 2020 update]. https://www.rug.nl/
ggdc/historicaldevelopment/maddison/research
The Maddison Project Database provides information on comparative economic growth and income
levels over the very long run. The 2020 version of this database covers 169 countries and the period
up to 2018.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
218
4.46.2 Real GDP per Capita (year 1900)
Real GDP per capita in 2011 US dollars for year 1900, multiple benchmarks.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
219
4.47 Measures of Democracy 1810-2018
Finnish Social Science Data Archive [producer and distributor]. (2019). Measures of democ-
racy 1810-2018 [codebook] [Version 8.0]
The data contain three different variables, created by Tatu Vanhanen. The variables in question are
political competition, political participation and the index of democratization.
The index of democratization is formed by multiplying the competition and the participation variables
and then dividing the outcome by 100.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
220
221
4.48 Migration and Remittances Data
The World Bank. (2021). Remittances data. https : / / datacatalog . worldbank . org / search /
dataset/0038132
Remittances Data provides a snapshot of latest statistics on remittance flows for 214 countries and
territories. It is calculated by World Bank staff calculation based on data from IMF Balance of
Payments Statistics database and data releases from central banks, national statistical agencies, and
World Bank country desks. All numbers are in current (nominal) US $ million.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
222
4.48.2 Outward Remittances Flow
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
223
4.49 National Elections Across Democracy and Autocracy, Version 6
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Hyde, S. D., & Marinov, N. (2012). Which elections can be lost? Political Analysis, 20 (2),
191–201
Hyde, S. D., & Marinov, N. (2021). Codebook for national elections across democracy and
autocracy dataset, 5.0. https://nelda.co/
The National Elections across Democracy and Autocracy (NELDA) dataset provides detailed in-
formation on all election events from 1945-2020. To be included, elections must be for a national
executive figure, such as a president, or for a national legislative body, such as a parliament, legisla-
ture, constituent assembly, or other directly elected representative bodies. In order for an election to
be included, voters must directly elect the person or persons appearing on the ballot to the national
post in question. Voting must also be direct, or by the people in the sense that mass voting takes
place. Microstates are now included but were not part of NELDA Versions 1-4.
If there were reports by either domestic or outside actors of media bias in favor of the incumbent or
ruling party, it is coded as a "Yes". In cases where the media is totally controlled by the government,
and/or no opposition is allowed, the answer is "Yes". It is possible that the answer is "No" even if the
political system is tightly controlled.
224
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
This variable indicates whether multiple political parties were technically legal. The legalization
of multiple parties need not necessarily mean the existence of a functioning opposition party, as there
may be other non-legal barriers to the development of an opposition party. Similarly, a well organized
opposition party may exist but may not be legal.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
225
4.49.3 Was Opposition Allowed
This variable indicates whether at least one opposition political party existed to contest the election.
Some countries have multiple government parties but no opposition political party. An opposition
party is one that is not in the government, meaning it is not affiliated with the incumbent party in
power.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
If there are protests and riots after elections, a "Yes" is coded. The riots and protests should at
least somewhat be related to the handling or outcome of the election.
226
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
227
4.50 Oil and Gas Data, 1932-2014
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Ross, M., & Mahdavi, P. (2015). Oil and gas data, 1932-2014. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/
ZTPW0Y
Global dataset of oil and natural gas production, prices, exports, and net exports. These data are
based on the best available information about the volume and value of oil and natural gas production
in all countries from 1932 to 2014. The volume figures are from the documents listed in the original
source; to calculate the total value of production, the author multiplies the volume by the world price
for oil or gas. Since these are world prices for a single (benchmark) type of oil/gas, they only ap-
proximate the actual price - which varies by country according to the quality, the terms of contracts,
the timing of the transactions, and other factors. These figures do not tell how much revenues were
collected by governments or companies - only the approximate volume and value of production. Data
on oil production from 1946 to 1969, and gas production from 1955 (when it first was reported) to
1969, are from the US Geological Survey Minerals Yearbook, for various years.
Available in Time-series
228
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
229
4.51 Open Budget Survey data
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
International Budget Partnership. (2019). Open budget survey data [Accessed on 2021-12-01].
https://www.internationalbudget.org/data-evidence/
The Open Budget Survey is a comprehensive analysis and survey that evaluates whether governments
give the public access to budget information and opportunities to participate in the budget process
at the national level. The survey also assesses the capacity and independence of formal oversight
institutions. The IBP works with civil society partners in 100 countries to collect the data for the
survey.
These materials were developed by the International Budget Partnership. IBP has given us permis-
sion to use the materials solely for noncommercial, educational purposes.
The Open Budget Index (OBI) is a comparative measure of central government budget transparency.
The OBI assigns countries covered by the Open Budget Survey a transparency score on a 100-point
scale using 109 of the 140 questions on the Survey. These questions focus specifically on whether the
government provides the public with timely access to comprehensive information contained in eight
key budget documents in accordance with international good practice standards.
230
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
231
4.52 Penn World Table
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Feenstra, R. C., Inklaar, R., & Timmer, M. P. (2015). The next generation of the penn world
table. The American Economic Review, 105 (10), 3150–3182. www.ggdc.net/pwt
The Penn World Table (PWT) version 10.0 is a database with information on relative levels of income,
output, input and productivity, covering 183 countries between 1950 and 2019.
In the Penn World Table the users are offered two different series of data for China. "China Version
1" uses the official growth rates for the whole period. "China Version 2" uses the recent modifications
of official Chinese growth rates. We have chosen to include China Version 1.
Human capital index based on the average years of schooling from Barro and Lee (Barro & Lee,
2013) and an assumed rate of return to education, based on Mincer equation estimates around the
world (Psacharopoulos, 1994).
More information can be found in the document "Human capital in PWT 9.0"
232
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
233
4.53 Political Constraint Index (POLCON) Dataset
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Henisz, W. J. (2017). The Political Constraint Index (POLCON) Dataset 2017 release. https:
//mgmt.wharton.upenn.edu/profile/1327
The measure of political constraints estimates the feasibility of policy change (the extent to which
a change in the preferences of any one actor may lead to a change in government policy) using the
following methodology. First, extracting data from political science databases, it identifies the num-
ber of independent branches of government (executive, lower and upper legislative chambers) with
veto power over policy change. The preferences of each of these branches and the status quo policy
are then assumed to be independently and identically drawn from a uniform, unidimensional policy
space. This assumption allows for the derivation of a quantitative measure of institutional hazards
using a simple spatial model of political interaction.
Dummy variable coded 1 if there is an independent judiciary (based on information from Polity’s
Executive Constraints, p_xconst) and - where available - on ICRG’s index of Law & Order.
234
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
235
4.54 Polity V Annual Time-Series, 1800-2018
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Marshall, M. G., & Gurr, T. R. (2020). Polity v project, political regime characteristics and
transitions, 1800-2018
The Polity project is one of the most widely used data resources for studying regime change and
the effects of regime authority. Polity5 Project, Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions,
1800-2018, annual, cross-national, time-series and polity-case formats coding democratic and auto-
cratic "patterns of authority" and regime changes in all independent countries with a total population
greater than 500,000 in 2018 (167 countries in 2018). Please note that the codes -99, -88, -77 and -66
have been recoded to missing.
Regime Durability: The number of years since the most recent regime change (defined by a three
point change in the p_polity score over a period of three years or less) or the end of a transition period
defined by the lack of stable political institutions (denoted by a standardized authority score). In
calculating the p_durable value, the first year during which a new (post-change) polity is established
is coded as the baseline "year zero" (value = 0) and each subsequent year adds one to the value of
the p_durable variable consecutively until a new regime change or transition period occurs.
236
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Revised Combined Polity Score: The polity score is computed by subtracting the p_autoc score
from the p_democ score; the resulting unified polity scale ranges from +10 (strongly democratic) to
-10 (strongly autocratic). The revised version of the polity variable is designed to facilitate the use
of the polity regime measure in time-series analyses. It modifies the combined annual polity score by
applying a simple treatment, or ’fix’ to convert instances of ’standardized authority scores’ (i.e., -66,
-77, and -88) to conventional polity scores (i.e., within the range, -10 to +10). The values have been
converted according to the following rule set:
(-77) Cases of ’interregnum’, or anarchy, are converted to a ’neutral’ Polity score of ’0.’
(-88) Cases of ’transition’ are prorated across the span of the transition.
For example, country X has a p_polity score of -7 in 1957, followed by three years of -88 and, finally,
a score of +5 in 1961. The change (+12) would be prorated over the intervening three years at a rate
of per year, so that the converted scores would be as follow: 1957 -7; 1958 -4; 1959 -1; 1960 +2; and
1961 +5.
237
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
238
4.55 Religion and State Project
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Fox, J. (2016). The unfree exercise of religion: A world survey of religious discrimination against
religious minorities. NY: Cambridge University Pres
Fox, J. (2019). A world survey of secular-religious competition: State religion policy from 1990
to 2014. Religion, State and Society, 47 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2018.1532750
Fox, J. (2015). Political secularism, religion, and the state: A time series analysis of world-
wide data. Cambridge University Press
Fox, J., Finke, R., & Mataic, D. R. (2018). New data and measures on societal discrimina-
tion and religious minorities. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, 2 (14)
Fox, J. (2008). A world survey of religion and the state. Cambridge University Press
The Religion and State (RAS) project is a university-based project located at Bar Ilan University in
Ramat Gan, Israel. Its goal is to create a set of measures that systematically gauge the intersection
between government and religion. Specifically, it examines government religion policy. The project’s
goals are threefold:
- To create a tool which will lead to greater understanding of the factors which influence government
religion policy.
- To provide the means to examine how government religion policy influences other political, social,
and economic factors as well as how those factors influence government religion policy.
Round 2 of the RAS dataset, which is currently the official version available for download, measures
the extent of government involvement in religion (GIR) or the lack thereof for 175 states on a yearly
basis between 1990 and 2014. This constitutes all countries with populations of 250,000 or more as
well as a sampling of smaller states. The data includes the following information:
Official Religion: A 15 value variable which measures the official relationship between religion and the
state. This includes five categories of official religions and nine categories of state-religion relationships
which range from unofficial support for a single religion to overt hostility to all religion.
Religious Support: This includes 51 separate variables which measure different ways a government
can support religion including financial support, policies which enforce religious laws, and other forms
of entanglement between government and religion.
Religious Restrictions: This includes 29 separate variables which measure different ways governments
regulate, restrict, or control all religions in the state including the majority religion. This includes
restrictions on religion’s political role, restrictions on religious institutions, restrictions on religious
239
practices, and other forms of regulation, control, and restrictions.
Religious Discrimination: This includes 30 types of restrictions that are placed on the religious
institutions and practices of religious minorities that are not placed on the majority group. This
includes restrictions on religious practices, restrictions on religious institutions and clergy, restrictions
on conversion and proselytizing, and other restrictions.
The dataset also includes several sets of detailed variables measuring certain policies in depth. These
topics include religious education, the registration of religious organizations, restrictions on abortion,
restrictions on proselytizing, and religious requirements for holding public office or citizenship.
Official Religion measures whether the government has an established religion. For a religion to
be established there must be a constitutional clause, a law, or the equivalent explicitly stating that
a specific religion or specific religions are the official religions of that state. This variable is coded on
the following scale:
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
240
4.56 Rule of Law Index
The World Justice Project (WJP) developed the WJP Rule of Law Index to serve as a quantitative
tool for measuring the rule of law in practice. The Indexs methodology and comprehensive definition
of the rule of law are the products of intensive consultation and vetting with academics, practitioners,
and community leaders from more than 100 countries and jurisdictions and 17 professional disciplines.
Absence of Corruption, Factor 2 of the WJP Rule of Law Index, measures the absence of corruption
in government. The factor considers three forms of corruption: bribery, improper influence by public
or private interests, and misappropriation of public funds or other resources. These three forms of
corruption are examined with respect to government officers in the executive branch, the judiciary,
the military, police, and the legislature.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
241
4.56.2 Civil Justice
Civil Justice, Factor 7 of the WJP Rule of Law Index, measures whether ordinary people can re-
solve their grievances peacefully and effectively through the civil justice system. It measures whether
civil justice systems are accessible and affordable as well as free of discrimination, corruption, and
improper influence by public officials. It examines whether court proceedings are conducted without
unreasonable delays and whether decisions are enforced effectively. It also measures the accessibility,
impartiality, and effectiveness of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Civil justice is free of corruption measures whether the civil justice system is free of bribery and
improper influence by private interests.
242
Available in Cross-section Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Criminal Justice, Factor 8 of the WJP Rule of Law Index, evaluates a countrys criminal justice
system. An effective criminal justice system is a key aspect of the rule of law, as it constitutes the
conventional mechanism to redress grievances and bring action against individuals for offenses against
society. An assessment of the delivery of criminal justice should take into consideration the entire
system, including the police, lawyers, prosecutors, judges, and prison officers.
243
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
This variable measures whether the police, prosecutors, and judges are free of bribery and improper
influence from criminal organizations.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
4.56.6 Executive Branch do not use Public Office for Private Gain
Government officials in the executive branch do not use public office for private gain variable mea-
sures the prevalence of bribery, informal payments, and other inducements in the delivery of public
services and the enforcement of regulations. It also measures whether government procurement and
public works contracts are awarded through an open and competitive bidding process, and whether
government officials at various levels of the executive branch refrain from embezzling public funds.
244
Available in Cross-section Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Constraints on Government Powers, Factor 1 of the WJP Rule of Law Index, measures the ex-
tent to which those who govern are bound by law. It comprises the means, both constitutional and
institutional, by which the powers of the government and its officials and agents are limited and held
accountable under the law. It also includes non-governmental checks on the governments power, such
as a free and independent press.
245
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
4.56.8 Judicial Branch do not use Public Office for Private Gain
Government officials in the judicial branch do not use public office for private gain measures whether
judges and judicial officials refrain from soliciting and accepting bribes to perform duties or expe-
dite processes, and whether the judiciary and judicial rulings are free of improper influence by the
government, private interests, and criminal organizations.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
4.56.9 Legislative branch do not use Public Office for Private Gain
Legislative branch do not use public office for private gain measures whether members of the leg-
islature refrain from soliciting or accepting bribes or other inducements in exchange for political
favors or favorable votes on legislation.
246
Available in Cross-section Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Order and Security, Factor 5 of the WJP Rule of Law Index, measures how well a society ensures the
security of persons and property. Security is one of the defining aspects of any rule of law society and
is a fundamental function of the state. It is also a precondition for the realization of the rights and
freedoms that the rule of law seeks to advance.
247
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
4.56.11 Police and the Military do not use Public Office for Private Gain
Government officials in the police and the military do not use public office for private gain mea-
sures whether police officers and criminal investigators refrain from soliciting and accepting bribes to
perform basic police services or to investigate crimes, and whether government officials in the police
and the military are free of improper influence by private interests or criminal organizations.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
248
4.57 Settler Mortality
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative de-
velopment: An empirical investigation. The American Economic Review, 91 (5), 1369–1401
Data used in the article The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investiga-
tion.
Log of the mortality rate faced by European settlers at the time of colonization.
Note: The data for Ethiopia is used for both Ethiopia (-1992) and Ethiopia (1993-).
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
249
4.58 State Fragility Index and Matrix
Marshall, M. G., & Elzinga-Marshall, G. (2017). Global report 2017: Conflict, governance, and
state fragility
The State Fragility Index and Matrix provides annual state fragility, effectiveness, and legitimacy
indices and the eight component indicators for the world’s 167 countries with populations greater
than 500,000 in 2018.
A country’s fragility is closely associated with its state capacity to manage conflict; make and im-
plement public policy; and deliver essential services and its systemic resilience in maintaining system
coherence, cohesion, and quality of life; responding effectively to challenges and crises, and sustain-
ing progressive development. State Fragility = Effectiveness Score + Legitimacy Score (25 points
possible).
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
250
251
4.59 Sustainable Governance Indicators
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Schiller, C., & Hellmann, T. (2022). Sustainable governance indicators 2022 [Date accessed: 03
October 2022]. Bertelsmann Stiftung. https://www.sgi-network.org
The Sustainable Governance Indicators (SGI) survey addresses one of the most pressing questions
facing the highly developed states of the OECD and the European Union in the 21st century: How can
we achieve sustainable policy outcomes while ensuring that policy-making processes remain focused
on long-term goals?
To answer this question, 41 countries of the OECD and the EU are assessed and compared on the
basis of 157 quantitative and qualitative indicators. The qualitative assessment is carried out by
more than 100 international experts from the academic community. These country reports are the
result of a multiphase process of survey and validation. This allows successful examples of sustainable
governance to be identified, along with corresponding policy and governance achievements.
The instrument is based on three pillars: the Sustainable Policies Index, which measures the sustain-
ability of policy outcomes; the Robust Democracy Index, which measures the quality of democracy;
and the Good Governance Index, which explores the extent to which a countrys institutional ar-
rangements enhance the public sectors capacity to act (executive capacity) as well as the extent to
which citizens, NGOs and other organizations are endowed with the participatory competence to hold
government accountable to its actions (executive accountability).
Sustainable Policies: Economic Policies (Economy, Labor Market, Taxes, Budgets, Research and
Innovation, Global Financial System).
252
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Sustainable Policies: Economic Policies - Budgets (Budgetary Policy, Debt to GDP, Primary Balance,
Debt Interest Ratio, Budget Consolidation).
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
253
4.59.3 Sustainable Policies: Economic Policies - Economy
Sustainable Policies: Economic Policies - Economy (Economic Policy, GDP per Capita, Inflation,
Gross Fixed Capital Formation, Real Interest Rate, Potential Output Growth Rate).
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Sustainable Policies: Economic Policies - Labor Market (Labor Market Policy, Unemployment, Long-
term Unemployment, Youth Unemployment, Low-skilled Unemployment, Employment, Low Pay In-
cidence).
254
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Sustainable Policies: Economic Policies - Taxes (Tax Policy, Tax System Complexity, Structural
Balance, Marginal Tax Burden for Businesses, Redistribution Effect).
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
255
4.59.6 Environmental Policy Performance Index
The index consists of two parts: Environment Index and Global Environmental Protection Index,
weighted equally. The variable varies between 0 and 10.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
The Environment index consists of the "Environmental Policy" indicator (50%), based on expert
assessments of environmental policy effectiveness, and nine indicators related to observable environ-
mental performance, including Energy Productivity (5,56%), Greenhouse Gas Emissions (5,56%),
Particulate Matter (5,56%), Biocapacity (5,56%), Waste Generation (5,56%), Material Recycling
(5,56%), Biodiversity (5,56%), Renewable Energy (5,56%), and Material footprint (5,56%). The
index varies from 0 to 10.
256
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
The Global Environmental Protection index consists of "Global Environmental Policy Indicator"
(50%), based on expert assessments of countries’ participation in global environmental protection
regimes, the rate of participation in Multilateral Environmental Agreements (25%), and Kyoto Par-
ticipation and Achievements indicator, measuring to what extent the Kyoto emission reduction targets
were met (25%). The index varies from 0 to 10.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
257
4.59.9 Robust Democracy
This pillar of the SGI examines the quality of democracy in each country. From the perspective
of long-term system stability and political performance, the quality of democracy and political par-
ticipation are crucial aspects of a society’s success. The stability and performance of a political system
depends in large part upon the assent and confidence of its citizens. Democratic participation and
oversight are also essential to genuine learning and adaptation processes, and to the ability to change.
In this sense, guaranteeing opportunities for democratic participation and oversight, as well as the
presence of due process and respect for civil rights, are fundamental prerequisites for the legitimacy of
a political system. The quality of democracy in each country is measured against a definitional norm
that considers issues relating to participation rights, electoral competition, access to information and
the rule of law. Given that all OECD and EU member states constitute democracies, the questions
posed here focus on the quality rather than the presence of democracy. Individual indicators monitor
the following criteria:
1. Electoral processes.
2. Access to information.
4. Rule of law.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
258
Robust Democracy: Electoral Process (Candidacy Procedures, Media Access, Voting and Registration
Rights, Party Financing, Popular Decision-making).
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Sustainable Policies: Social Policies (Education, Social Inclusion, Health, Families, Pensions, In-
tegration, Safe Living, Global Inequalities).
259
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Sustainable Policies: Social Policies - Education (Education Policy, Upper Secondary Attainment,
Tertiary Attainment, Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Results, Programme
for International Student Assessment (PISA) Socioeconomic Background, Pre-primary Expenditure).
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
260
4.59.13 Sustainable Policies: Social Policies - Families
Sustainable Policies: Social Policies - Families (Family Policy, Child Care Density Age 0-2, Child
Care Density Age 3-5, Fertility Rate, Child Poverty Rate).
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Sustainable Policies: Social Policies - Global Inequalities (Global Social Policy, Official Development
Assistance (ODA)).
261
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Sustainable Policies: Social Policies - Health (Health Policy, Spending on Health Programs, Life
Expectancy, Infant Mortality, Perceived Health Status).
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
262
4.59.16 Sustainable Policies: Social Policies - Integration Policy
Sustainable Policies: Social Policies - Integration (Integration Policy, Foreign-born to Native Up-
per Secondary Attainment, Foreign-born to Native Tertiary Attainment, Foreign-born to Native
Unemployment, Foreign-born to Native Employment).
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Sustainable Policies: Social Policies - Pensions (Pension Policy, Older Employment, Old Age De-
pendency Ratio, Senior Citizen Poverty).
263
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Sustainable Policies: Social Policies - Social Inclusion (Social Inclusion Policy, Poverty Rate, NEET
Rate, Gini Coefficient, Gender Equality in Parliaments, Life Satisfaction).
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
264
4.59.19 Sustainable Policies: Social Policies - Safe Living Conditions
Sustainable Policies: Social Policies - Safe Living (Internal Security Policy, Homicides, Thefts, Con-
fidence in Police).
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
265
4.60 The ATOP State-Year dataset
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Leeds, B., Ashley, J., Ritter, S. M., McLaughlin, M., & Long, A. G. (2002). Alliance treaty
obligations and provisions, 1815–1944. International Interactions, 28, 237–260
The Alliance Treaty Obligations and Provisions (ATOP) project provides data regarding the content
of military alliance agreements signed by all countries of the world between 1815 and 2018.
Member of an Alliance
1. Member of an alliance
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
266
4.60.2 Number of Alliances
Number of Alliances
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
267
4.61 The Authoritarian Regime Dataset
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Wahman, M., Teorell, J., & Hadenius, A. (2013). Authoritarian regime types revisited: Updated
data in comparative perspective. Contemporary Politics, 19 (1), 19–34
Teorell, J., & Wahman, M. (2018). Institutional stepping stones for democracy: How and why
multipartyism enhances democratic change. Democratization, 25 (1), 78–97
Hadenius, A., & Teorell, J. (2007). Pathways from authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy,
18 (1), 143–157
The Authoritarian Regimes Dataset version 6.0 covers the time period 1972-2014 and includes all
192 nations recognized as members of the UN except the four micro states of Europe (Andorra,
Liechtenstein, Monaco and San Marino) and two micro states in the Pacific that are not members of
the World Bank (Nauru and Tuvalu).
The variables for "Colonial Origin" and "Region" were updated until 2014 by the original authors.
QoG imputes this information until 2021.
This is a tenfold classification of the former colonial ruler of the country. Following Bernard et
al. (2004), we have excluded the British settler colonies (the US, Canada, Australia, Israel and New
Zealand), and exclusively focused on "Western overseas" colonialism. This implies that only West-
ern colonizers (e.g. excluding Japanese colonialism), and only countries located in the non-Western
hemisphere "overseas" (e.g. excluding Ireland & Malta), have been coded. Each country that has
been colonized since 1700 is coded. In cases of several colonial powers, the last one is counted, if it
lasted for 10 years or longer. The categories are the following:
1. Dutch
2. Spanish
3. Italian
4. US
5. British
6. French
268
7. Portuguese
8. Belgian
9. British-French
10. Australian
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Imputed average Polity [original variable revpol2] & Freedom House [original variable fhadd] scores
(scaled 010), where missing values have been imputed by regressing the fhpol index on the Freedom
House scores [original variable fhadd], which have better country coverage than Polity2 Countries
with an ifhpol score larger than 7.0 are coded as democracies.
Available in Time-series
269
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
This is a tenfold politico-geographic classification of world regions, based on a mixture of two consid-
erations: geographical proximity (with the partial exception of category 5 below) and demarcation
by area specialists having contributed to a regional understanding of democratization. The categories
are as follow:
3. North Africa & the Middle East (including Israel, Turkey & Cyprus)
4. Sub-Saharan Africa
5. Western Europe and North America (including Australia & New Zealand)
7. South-East Asia
8. South Asia
10. The Caribbean (including Belize, Guyana & Suriname, but excluding Cuba, Haiti & the Domini-
can Republic)
270
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
This typology of authoritarian regimes is based on a distinction between three modes of political
power maintenance (probably the three most widely used throughout history): hereditary succession
(lineage), corresponding to monarchies; the actual or threatened use of military force, corresponding
to military regimes; and popular elections, designating electoral regimes. Among the latter we dis-
tinguish among no-party regimes (where all parties are prohibited), one-party regimes (where all but
one party is prohibited), and limited multiparty regimes (where multiple parties are allowed but the
system still does not pass as democratic); a subtype of these regimes where no parties are present,
although not being prohibited, are coded as "partyless" regimes. A subtype of military regimes are
coded "rebel regimes", where a rebel movement has taken power by military means. We also code
hybrids (or amalgams) combining elements from more than one regime type, as well as several minor
types of regimes: "theocracies", "transitional" regimes, "civil war", foreign "occupation", and a resid-
ual "other" category. Using the mean of the Freedom House and Polity scales (fh_ipolity2), the line
between democracies and autocracies is drawn at 7.5. This threshold value was chosen by estimating
the mean cutoff point separating democracy from autocracy in five well-known categorical measures
of democracy: those of Przeworski et al. (2000), Mainwaring et al. (2001), and Reich (2002), together
with Freedom House’s and Polity’s own categorical thresholds for democracy.
1. Limited Multiparty
2. Partyless
3. No-Party
4. Military
5. Military No-Party
6. Military Multiparty
7. Military One-party
8. One-Party
9. Other
271
17. Monarchy
20. Occupation
21. Theocracy
25. Multiparty-Occupied
100. Democracy
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
A simplified, collapsed version of ht_regtype, where all monarchical regimes with amalgams [ht_reg-
type =16, 17, 23 or 24] are treated as monarchies, all military regimes with sub-types and amalgams
[ht_regtype=4, 5, 6, 7 or 18] are treated as military regimes, and multiparty regimes with sub-types
are treated as multiparty regimes [ht_regtype=1 or 2]. Only pure noparty [ht_regtype=3] and one-
party [ht_regtype=8] regimes are treated as no-party and one-party regimes, respectively. The minor
types [ht_regtype=9, 19, 20, 21, 22 or 25] are treated as other.
272
1. Monarchy
2. Military
3. One party
4. Multi-party
9. No-party
99. Other
100. Democracy
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
273
4.62 The Bayesian Corruption Index
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Standaert, S. (2015). Divining the level of corruption: A bayesian state-space approach. Journal
of Comparative Economics, 43 (3), 782–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2014.05.007
The Bayesian Corruption Index is a composite index of the perceived overall level of corruption:
with corruption refered to as the "abuse of public power for private gain". Perceived corruption:
Given the hidden nature of corruption, direct measures are hard to come by, or inherently flawed
(e.g. the number of corruption convictions). Instead, we amalgamate the opinion on the level of
corruption from inhabitants of the country, companies operating there, NGOs, and officials working
both in governmental and supra-governmental organizations. Composite: it combines the information
of 20 different surveys and more than 80 different survey questions that cover the perceived level of
corruption.
The augmentation allows an increase of the coverage of the BCI: a 60% to 100% increase relative to
the WGI and CPI, respectively. In addition, in contrast to the WGI or CPI, the underlying source
data are entered without any ex-ante imputations, averaging or other manipulations. This results in
an index that truly represents the underlying data, unbiased by any modeling choices of the composer.
The BCI index values lie between 0 and 100, with an increase in the index corresponding to a
raise in the level of corruption. This is a first difference with CPI and WGI where an increase means
that the level of corruption has decreased.
There exists no objective scale on which to measure the perception of corruption and the exact scaling
you use is to a large extent arbitrary. However, we were able to give the index an absolute scale: zero
corresponds to a situation where all surveys say that there is absolutely no corruption. On the other
hand, when the index is one, all surveys say that corruption is as bad as it gets according to their
scale. This is another difference with CPI and WGI, where the scaling is relative. They are rescaled
such that WGI has mean 0 and a standard deviation of 1 in each year, while CPI always lies between
0 and 100.
In contrast, the actual range of values of the BCI will change in each year, depending how close
countries come to the situation where everyone agrees there is no corruption at all (0), or that
corruption is as bad as it can get (100).
274
The absolute scale of the BCI index was obtained by rescaling all the individual survey data such that
zero corresponds to the lowest possible level of corruption and 1 to the highest one. We subsequently
rescaled the BCI index such that when all underlying indicators are zero (one), the expected value of
the BCI index is zero (hundred).
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
275
4.63 The CIRIGHTS Data project
Dataset by: Cingranelli, David L., David L. Richards, and K. Chad Clay
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Cingranelli, D. L., Filippov, M., & Mark, S. (2019). The CIRIGHTS dataset [Version 2019.07.21].
The Binghamton University Human Right Institute. www.binghamton.edu/institutes/hri
Cingranelli, D. L., Richards, D. L., & Clay, K. C. (2014). The CIRI Human Rights Dataset
[Version 2014.04.14]. CIRI Human Rights Data Project, 6
The CIRI Human Rights Dataset contains standards-based quantitative information on government
respect for 15 internationally recognized human rights for 202 countries, annually from 1981-2011. It is
designed for use by scholars and students who seek to test theories about the causes and consequences
of human rights violations, as well as policy makers and analysts who seek to estimate the human
rights effects of a wide variety of institutional changes and public policies including democratization,
economic aid, military aid, structural adjustment, and humanitarian intervention.
The original dataset contains the last version of the CIRI dataset, along with supporting docu-
mentation. The creation of the data and documentation has been supported by the National Science
Foundation under Grant Nos. SES–0318273 (2004-2006), SES-0647969 (2007-2010), and SES-0647916
(2007-2010). (2014-04-14)
Note: The three different missing codes -66 (country is occupied by foreign powers), -77 (complete
collapse of central authority), -999 (missing) have all been coded as missing.
It is an internationally recognized right of citizens to assemble freely and to associate with other
persons in political parties, trade unions, cultural organizations, or other special-interest groups.
This variable indicates the extent to which the freedoms of assembly and association are subject to
actual governmental limitations or restrictions (as opposed to strictly legal protections). A score
of 0 indicates that citizens’ rights to freedom of assembly or association were severely restricted or
denied completely to all citizens; a score of 1 indicates that these rights were limited for all citizens
or severely restricted or denied for select groups; and a score of 2 indicates that these rights were
virtually unrestricted and freely enjoyed by practically all citizens in a given year.
276
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
This variable indicates citizens’ freedom to travel within their own country. A score of 0 indicates
that this freedom was severely restricted; a score of 1 indicates the freedom was somewhat restricted,
and a score of 2 indicates unrestricted freedom of foreign movement.
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
277
4.63.3 Freedom of Foreign Movement
This variable indicates citizens’ freedom to leave and return to their country. A score of 0 indi-
cates that this freedom was severely restricted, a score of 1 indicates the freedom was somewhat
restricted, and a score of 2 indicates unrestricted freedom of foreign movement.
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
This variable indicates the extent to which the judiciary is independent of control from other sources,
such as another branch of the government or the military. A score of 0 indicates "not independent",
a score of 1 indicates "partially independent" and a score of 2 indicates "generally independent".
278
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
This is an additive index constructed from the Torture, Extrajudicial Killing, Political Imprison-
ment, and Disappearance indicators. It ranges from 0 (no government respect for these four rights)
to 8 (full government respect for these four rights).
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
279
4.63.6 Political Imprisonment
Political imprisonment refers to the incarceration of people by government officials because of: their
speech; their non-violent opposition to government policies or leaders; their religious beliefs; their
non-violent religious practices including proselytizing; or their membership in a group, including an
ethnic or racial group. A score of 0 indicates that there were many people imprisoned because of
their religious, political, or other beliefs in a given year; a score of 1indicates that a few people were
imprisoned; and a score of 2 indicates that no persons were imprisoned for any of the above reasons
in a given year.
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
This variable indicates the extent to which freedoms of speech and press are affected by govern-
ment censorship, including ownership of media outlets. Censorship is any form of restriction that is
placed on freedom of the press, speech or expression. Expression may be in the form of art or music.
A score of 0 indicates that government censorship of the media was complete; a score of 1 indicates
that there was some government censorship of the media; and a score of 2 indicates that there was
no government censorship of the media in a given year.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
4.63.8 Torture
Torture refers to the purposeful inflicting of extreme pain, whether mental or physical, by government
officials or by private individuals at the instigation of government officials. Torture includes the use
of physical and other force by police and prison guards that is cruel, inhuman, or degrading. This
also includes deaths in custody due to negligence by government officials. A score of 0 indicates that
torture was practiced frequently in a given year; a score of 1 indicates that torture was practiced
occasionally; and a score of 2 indicates that torture did not occur in a given year.
Available in Time-series
281
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
282
4.64 The Comparative Abortion Index Project
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
The comparative abortion index quantifies the permissiveness of abortion policies worldwide, ac-
counting for a variety of considerations. It aims to provide researchers with a tool to assess trends
in worldwide reproductive rights, and to study how these changes over time and space occur. It is
unique in its breadth and its method. Not only does it include a scale that reflects the number of
criteria accepted as grounds for abortion, but it includes a second scale which gives weighted scores to
each criterion, based on how common it is. These data are relevant for anyone interested in tracking
trends in women’s rights, public health policy, and reproductive rights policy over time.
The dataset covers 192 countries from 1992-2015. The UN Department of Social and Economic
Affairs has published a global review of abortion policy since 1992. For this database, all reviews
published between 1992 and 2015 were collected. The report offers seven criteria under which state
law may allow access to abortion services; saving a woman’s life, preserving a woman’s physical health,
preserving a woman’s mental health, in case of rape or incest, in case of fetal impairment, for social
or economic reasons and on request.
Each country-year is given a score based on the number of legal criteria accepted as grounds for
abortion. In the first version of the index (CAI1), each criterion is given equal weight and the score
is a direct reflection of the number of conditions the country accepts. Thus, a country that has no
conditions under which a woman can receive an abortion gets a score of 0. A country, in which a
woman may access an abortion under all conditions including on request, receives a score of 7.
For the purposes of robustness, and to fix a potential measurement flaw in the first index, we also offer
a weighted index (CAI2). The first scale does not account for the different degrees of acceptance that
each criterion represents. It would be imprecise, for instance, to suggest that the criterion of saving a
woman’s life is equivalent to (and thus carries the same weight as) allowing abortion on demand. The
more permissive the criterion, the less likely that it is universally accepted. Accordingly, the weight
of each criterion (Wi) will be determined based on the percentage (Pi) of countries that allow that
condition. In the weighted index, countries are given a score on a scale of 0 to1, where 0 represents
countries in which there are no conditions for legal abortion, and 1 represents a country that accepts
all criteria for abortion, including on request.
Using the 7 grounds for legal abortion, the weight of each grounds (Wi) will be determined based
on the percentage (Pi) of countries that allow it. In the weighted index, countries are given a score
on a scale of 0-1, where 0 represents countries in which there are no conditions for legal abortion,
283
and 1 represents a country that accepts all criteria for abortion, including on request. The need for
a weighted scale is as follows: It would be imprecise, for instance, to suggest that the criterion of
saving a woman’s life is equivalent to (and thus carries the same weight as) allowing abortion on
demand. The more permissive the criterion, the less likely that it is universally accepted. Thus, the
scale accounts for the different degrees of acceptance that each criterion represents.
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
284
4.65 The GenDip database on Gender and Diplomatic Representation
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Niklasson, B., & Towns, A. E. (2022). The gendip dataset on gender and diplomatic representa-
tion, version june21
The purpose of this dataset is to provide information on the gender of diplomats around the world,
data that has so far been missing from existing datasets on diplomatic exchanges (Bayer 2006; Rhamey
et al. 2013; Moyer et al. 2020).
For this dataset, only countries with at least 75% information on the gender of the diplomats is used.
The hope of the researchers is thus that the GenDip dataset will supply the fields of international
politics and gender and politics including the exciting and fast-growing research field on gender
in diplomacy with a foundation to be explored and developed in the quest to improve theories of
diplomatic exchanges as well as of gender representation.
Women diplomats received to all postings as a share of all the postings received.
285
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Women diplomats sent to all postings as a share of all the postings sent.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
286
4.66 The Gender Inequality Index
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
United Nations Development Program. (2022b). Human development report 2021/2022. https:
//hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2021-22
The Gender Inequality Index (GII) reflects gender-based disadvantage in three dimensions - repro-
ductive health, empowerment and the labour market - for as many countries as data of reasonable
quality allow. It shows the loss in potential human development due to inequality between female
and male achievements in these dimensions. It ranges from 0, where women and men fare equally, to
1, where one gender fares as poorly as possible in all measured dimensions.
The GII is an inequality index (0 to 1 higher disparity). It measures gender inequalities in three
important aspects of human development-reproductive health, measured by maternal mortality ratio
and adolescent birth rates; empowerment, measured by proportion of parliamentary seats occupied
by females and proportion of adult females and males aged 25 years and older with at least some
secondary education; and economic status, expressed as labour market participation and measured
by labour force participation rate of female and male populations aged 15 years and older. The GII is
built on the same framework as the IHDI-to better expose differences in the distribution of achieve-
ments between women and men. It measures the human development costs of gender inequality.
Thus the higher the GII value the more disparities between females and males and the more loss to
human development.
287
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
288
4.67 The International Country Risk Guide (ICRG)
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Now covering 141 developed, emerging, frontier countries and offshore financial centers, ICRG presents
monthly political, economic, financial and composite risk ratings and forecasts.
From risks presented by government instability, the threat of asset expropriation, transfer and pay-
ment delays, to forms of internal conflict, terrorism, and corruption, ICRG has been labelled ’a vital
source for managing and advising investment funds that focus on volatile countries, both emerging
and developed.’
The mean value of the ICRG variables ’Corruption’, ’Law and Order’ and ’Bureaucracy Quality’,
scaled from 0 to 1. Higher values indicate higher quality of government.
Corruption:
This is an assessment of corruption within the political system. Such corruption is a threat to
foreign investment for several reasons: it distorts the economic and financial environment; it reduces
the efficiency of government and business by enabling people to assume positions of power through
patronage rather than ability; and, last but not least, it introduces an inherent instability into the
political process. The most common form of corruption met directly by business is financial corruption
in the form of demands for special payments and bribes connected with import and export licenses,
exchange controls, tax assessments, police protection, or loans. Such corruption can make it difficult
to conduct business effectively, and in some cases may force the withdrawal or withholding of an
investment. Although the measure takes such corruption into account, it is more concerned with
actual or potential corruption in the form of excessive patronage, nepotism, job reservations, ’favor-
for-favors’, secret party funding, and suspiciously close ties between politics and business. According
to ICRG, these insidious sorts of corruption are potentially of much greater risk to foreign business
in that they can lead to popular discontent, unrealistic and inefficient controls on the state economy,
and encourage the development of the black market. The greatest risk in such corruption is that at
some time it will become so overweening, or some major scandal will be suddenly revealed, so as to
provoke a popular backlash, resulting in a fall or overthrow of the government, a major reorganizing
or restructuring of the country’s political institutions, or, at worst, a breakdown in law and order,
rendering the country ungovernable.
Law and Order are assessed separately, with each sub-component comprising zero to three points.
The Law sub-component is an assessment of the strength and impartiality of the legal system, while
289
the Order sub-component is an assessment of popular observance of the law. Thus, a country can
enjoy a high rating in terms of its judicial system, but a low rating if it suffers from a very high
crime rate or if the law is routinely ignored without effective sanction (for example, widespread illegal
strikes).
Bureaucracy Quality:
The institutional strength and quality of the bureaucracy is another shock absorber that tends to
minimize revisions of policy when governments change. Therefore, high points are given to countries
where the bureaucracy has the strength and expertise to govern without drastic changes in policy
or interruptions in government services. In these low-risk countries, the bureaucracy tends to be
somewhat autonomous from political pressure and to have an established mechanism for recruitment
and training. Countries that lack the cushioning effect of a strong bureaucracy receive low points
because a change in government tends to be traumatic in terms of policy formulation and day-to-day
administrative functions.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
290
4.68 The Ocean Health Index Data
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Halpern, B., Longo, C., Hardy, D., McLeod, K., Samhouri, J., & Steven Katona, e. a. (2018).
Ocean health index [Date accessed: 07 December 2021]. https://github.com/OHI-Science/ohi-
global/releases
Halpern, B., Longo, C., Hardy, D., McLeod, K., Samhouri, J., & Steven Katona, e. a. (2012).
An index to assess the health and benefits of the global ocean. Nature, 488, 615–620. https:
//doi.org/10.1038/nature11397
Index, O. H. (2022). Global scenarios data for ocean health index [Date accessed: 09 December
2022]. https://github.com/OHI-Science/ohi-global/releases
The Ocean Health Index is a valuable tool for the ongoing assessment of ocean health. By providing
a means to advance comprehensive ocean policy and compare future progress, the Index can inform
decisions about how to use or protect marine ecosystems.
The Index is a collaborative effort, made possible through contributions from more than 65 scien-
tists/ocean experts and partnerships between organizations including the National Center for Ecolog-
ical Analysis and Synthesis, Sea Around Us, Conservation International, National Geographic, and
the New England Aquarium.
The Index assesses the ocean based on 10 widely-held public goals for a healthy ocean. They are: Food
Provision, Artisanal Fishing Opportunities, Natural Products, Carbon Storage, Coastal Protection,
Sense of Place, Coastal Livelihoods & Economies, Tourism & Recreation, Clean Waters, Biodiversity.
Please note that every year the OHI team improve the Ocean Health Index by incorporating new
data, knowledge, and feedback. In order to make scores comparable among years, they recalculate
previous years results using the most recent methods and data.
The Ocean Health Index establishes reference points for achieving ten widely accepted socio-ecological
objectives and scores the oceans adjacent to 171 countries and territories on how successfully they de-
liver these goals. Evaluated globally and by country, these ten public goals represent the wide range of
benefits that a healthy ocean can provide; each country’s overall score is the average of its respective
goal scores. The ten socio-ecological objectives are: Food Provision, Artisanal Fishing Opportunities,
Natural Products, Carbon Storage, Coastal Protection, Coastal Livelihoods & Economies, Tourism
& Recreation, Sense of Place, Clean Waters, Biodiversity. The index varies from 0 to 100.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
292
4.69 The Political Terror Scale
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Gibney, M., Cornett, L., Wood, R., Haschke, P., Arnon, D., Pisanò, A., Barrett, G., & Park,
B. (2020). The political terror scale 1976-2019 [Data retrieved from the Political Terror Scale
website]. http://www.politicalterrorscale.org
The PTS seeks to measure political terror. The authors define political terror as violations of basic
human rights to the physical integrity of the person by agents of the state within the territorial
boundaries of the state in question. It is important to note that political terror as defined by the
PTS is not synonymous with terrorism or the use of violence and intimidation in pursuit of political
aims. The concept is also distinguishable from terrorism as a tactic or from criminal acts.
The PTS measures levels of political violence and terror that a country experiences in a particular year
based on a 5-level "terror scale" originally developed by Freedom House. The data used in compiling
this index comes from three different sources: the yearly country reports of Amnesty International,
the U.S. State Department Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, and Human Rights Watch’s
World Reports.
Political Terror Scale Levels from the yearly country reports of Amnesty International:
1. Countries under a secure rule of law, people are not imprisoned for their view, and torture is rare
or exceptional. Political murders are extremely rare.
2. There is a limited amount of imprisonment for nonviolent political activity. However, few persons
are affected, torture and beatings are exceptional. Political murder is rare.
4. Civil and political rights violations have expanded to large numbers of the population. Murders,
disappearances, and torture are a common part of life. In spite of its generality, on this level terror
affects those who interest themselves in politics or ideas.
5. Terror has expanded to the whole population. The leaders of these societies place no limits on the
means or thoroughness with which they pursue personal or ideological goals.
293
Available in Cross-section Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Political Terror Scale Levels from the Human Rights Watch’s World Reports:
1. Countries under a secure rule of law, people are not imprisoned for their view, and torture is rare
or exceptional. Political murders are extremely rare.
2. There is a limited amount of imprisonment for nonviolent political activity. However, few persons
are affected, torture and beatings are exceptional. Political murder is rare.
4. Civil and political rights violations have expanded to large numbers of the population. Murders,
disappearances, and torture are a common part of life. In spite of its generality, on this level terror
affects those who interest themselves in politics or ideas.
5. Terror has expanded to the whole population. The leaders of these societies place no limits on the
means or thoroughness with which they pursue personal or ideological goals.
294
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
295
4.70 The Property Rights Protection Index
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Ouattara, B., & Standaert, S. (2020). Property rights revisited. European Journal of Political
Economy, 64, 101895. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101895
Over the last two decades, numerous studies have tried to quantify the effect of property rights on a
wide range of societal outcomes, including growth, trade, and, to a lesser extent, inequality. However,
a major limitation of these studies has been the data measuring property rights. These suffer from a
number of shortcomings, including a lack of availability, focus, and objectivity.
Ouattara and Standaert address this gap by composing a new index of property rights that strictly
focuses on the protection of these rights. As is common with indicators of governance, there is little
to no objective data available that can be used to directly compare the security of property rights
across countries. Instead, perception-based indicators such as survey-data or expert assessments are
used to capture the opinion of a range of actors. The researchers’ approach is to combine a data
set of 18 such indicators from 7 different sources. The selection of an indicator depends on whether
it directly measures the degree to which a country’s laws protect private property rights and the
degree to which its government enforces those laws, including the probability that private property
is expropriated. By focusing on property rights alone, this allows the researchers to disentangle its
effect from that of the overall quality of the judicial system and other aspects of the institutional
framework. This ensures a better match between theoretical models and empirical tests on the effects
of property rights.
This is done for as wide a group of countries and as long a time span as possible, increasing the
index coverage by as much as 45% compared to other indexes - this index covers 191 countries cross
twenty-year period between 1994 - 2014.
The Poperty Rights Index measures (the perception of) the security of property rights, separately
from other aspects of the rule of laws. It combines all publicly available information on the perception
of the security of property rights (18 singular indicators of property rights).
296
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
297
4.71 The Worldwide Governance Indicators
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: A
summary of methodology, data and analytical issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Pa-
per, 5430
Governance consists of the traditions and institutions by which authority in a country is exercised.
This includes the process by which governments are selected, monitored and replaced; the capacity
of the government to effectively formulate and implement sound policies; and the respect of citizens
and the state for the institutions that govern economic and social interactions among them.
The Worldwide Governance Indicators report on six broad dimensions of governance for over 200
countries and territories over the period 1996-2021:
- Government Effectiveness
- Regulatory Quality
- Rule of Law
- Control of Corruption
The Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) are a research dataset summarizing the views on the
quality of governance provided by a large number of enterprise, citizen and expert survey respondents
in industrial and developing countries. These data are gathered from a number of survey institutes,
think tanks, non-governmental organizations, international organizations, and private sector firms.
The WGI do not reflect the official views of the Natural Resource Governance Institute, the Brookings
Institutions, the World Bank, its Executive Directors, or the countries they represent. The WGI are
not used by the World Bank Group to allocate resources.
Please note: the 2022 WGI update includes significant revisions to the underlying source data that
affect the data for earlier years in the WGI dataset. This means the data has been retroactively ad-
justed in the dataset. Please go to the [WGI website](https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/)
to read more about the changes to the dataset.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
299
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Political Stability and Absence of Violence- Estimate: ’Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism’
measures perceptions of the likelihood of political instability and/or politically-motivated violence,
including terrorism.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
300
4.71.4 Rule of Law, Estimate
Rule of Law - Estimate: ’Rule of Law’ includes several indicators which measure the extent to
which agents have confidence in and abide by the rules of society. These include perceptions of the
incidence of crime, the effectiveness and predictability of the judiciary, and the enforceability of con-
tracts. Together, these indicators measure the success of a society in developing an environment in
which fair and predictable rules form the basis for economic and social interactions and the extent to
which property rights are protected.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
301
4.72 UN E-Government Knowledgebase
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2022). United nations e-government survey. https:
//publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2022
The E-Government Development Index presents the state of E-Government Development of the
United Nations Member States. Along with an assessment of the website development patterns
in a country, the E-Government Development index incorporates the access characteristics, such as
the infrastructure and educational levels, to reflect how a country is using information technologies
to promote access and inclusion of its people. The EGDI is a composite measure of three important
dimensions of e-government, namely: provision of online services, telecommunication connectivity
and human capacity.
The EGDI is based on a comprehensive Survey of the online presence of all 193 United Nations
Member States, which assesses national websites and how e-government policies and strategies are
applied in general and in specific sectors for delivery of essential services. The assessment rates
the e-government performance of countries relative to one another as opposed to being an absolute
measurement. The results are tabulated and combined with a set of indicators embodying a countrys
capacity to participate in the information society, without which e-government development efforts
are of limited immediate use.
Although the basic model has remained consistent, the precise meaning of these values varies from
one edition of the Survey to the next as understanding of the potential of e-government changes and
the underlying technology evolves. This is an important distinction because it also implies that it
is a comparative framework that seeks to encompass various approaches that may evolve over time
instead of advocating a linear path with an absolute goal.
Mathematically, the EGDI is a weighted average of three normalized scores on three most important
dimensions of e-government, namely: (1) scope and quality of online services (Online Service Index,
OSI), (2) development status of telecommunication infrastructure (Telecommunication Infrastructure
Index, TII), and (3) inherent human capital (Human Capital Index, HCI).
The EGDI is not designed to capture e-government development in an absolute sense; rather, it aims
to give a performance rating of national governments relative to one another.
The E-Government Development Index (EGDI) is a weighted average of normalised scores on the
three most important dimensions of e-government, namely: scope and quality of online services (On-
line Service Index, OSI), status of the development of telecommunication infrastructure (Telecommu-
nication Infrastructure Index, TII) and inherent human capital (Human Capital Index, HCI). Each of
these sets of indices is in itself a composite measure that can be extracted and analysed independently.
302
Type of variable: Continuous
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
303
4.73 Varieties of Democracy Dataset version 12
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Pemstein, D., Marquardt, K. L., Tzelgov, E., Wang, Y.-t., Medzihorsky, J., Krusell, J., Miri, F.,
& von Römer, J. (2022). The V-Dem measurement model: Latent variable analysis for cross-
national and cross-temporal expert-coded data
Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Knutsen, C. H., Lindberg, S. I., Teorell, J., Alizada, N., Altman,
D., Bernhard, M., Cornell, A., Fish, M. S., Gastaldi, L., Gjerløw, H., Glynn, A., Hicken, A.,
Hindle, G., Ilchenko, N., Krusell, J., Luhrmann, A., Maerz, S. F., . . . Ziblatt, D. (2022). V-dem
[country-year/country-date] dataset v12. https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemds22
Please note there have been some changes introduced to the methodology; please refer to the website
of the original source to read said modifications in more detail.
The political corruption index addresses how pervasive political corruption is.
Clarification: The directionality of the V-Dem corruption index runs from less corrupt (0) to more
corrupt (1) (unlike the other V-Dem variables that generally run from less democratic to more demo-
cratic situation). The corruption index includes measures of six distinct types of corruption that
cover both different areas and levels of the polity realm, distinguishing between executive, legislative
and judicial corruption. Within the executive realm, the measures also distinguish between corrup-
tion mostly pertaining to bribery and corruption due to embezzlement. Finally, they differentiate
between corruption in the highest echelons of the executive (at the level of the rulers/cabinet) on
the one hand, and in the public sector at large on the other. The measures thus tap into several
distinguished types of corruption: both ’petty’ and ’grand’; both bribery and theft; both corruption
aimed and influencing law making and that affecting implementation. Aggregation: The index is
arrived at by taking the average of (a) public sector corruption index; (b) executive corruption index;
(c) the indicator for legislative corruption; and (d) the indicator for judicial corruption. In other
words, these four different government spheres are weighted equally in the resulting index. V-Dem
replaces missing values for countries with no legislature by only taking the average of (a), (b) and
(d).
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Deliberative democracy index. Question: To what extent is the ideal of deliberative democracy
achieved?
Clarification: The deliberative principle of democracy focuses on the process by which decisions are
reached in a polity. A deliberative process is one in which public reasoning focused on the com-
mon good motivates political decisions - as contrasted with emotional appeals, solidary attachments,
parochial interests, or coercion. According to this principle, democracy requires more than an aggre-
gation of existing preferences. There should also be respectful dialogue at all levels - from preference
formation to final decision - among informed and competent participants who are open to persuasion.
To make it a measure of not only the deliberative principle but also of democracy, the index also
takes the level of electoral democracy into account.
305
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Egalitarian democracy index. Question: To what extent is the ideal of egalitarian democracy
achieved?
Clarifications: The egalitarian principle of democracy holds that material and immaterial inequalities
inhibit the exercise of formal rights and liberties, and diminish the ability of citizens from all social
groups to participate. Egalitarian democracy is achieved when 1) rights and freedoms of individuals
are protected equally across all social groups; and 2) resources are distributed equally across all social
groups. The distribution of resources must be sufficient to ensure that citizens’ basic needs are met
in a way that enables their meaningful participation. Additionally, an equal distribution of resources
ensures the potential for greater equality in the distribution of power. To make it a measure of
egalitarian democracy, the index also takes the level of electoral democracy into account.
306
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Women political empowerment index. Question: How politically empowered are women?
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
The liberal democracy index addresses to what extent the ideal of liberal democracy is achieved.
Clarifications: The liberal principle of democracy emphasizes the importance of protecting individual
and minority rights against the tyranny of the state and the tyranny of the majority. The liberal
model takes a "negative" view of political power insofar as it judges the quality of democracy by the
limits placed on government. This is achieved by constitutionally protected civil liberties, strong rule
307
of law, an independent judiciary, and effective checks and balances that, together, limit the exercise
of executive power. To make this a measure of liberal democracy, the index also takes the level of
electoral democracy into account.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Media corrupt. Question: Do journalists, publishers, or broadcasters accept payments in exchange for
altering news coverage? V-Dem uses a specifically designed measurement model to provide country-
year point estimates, aggregated from multiple codings submitted by country experts by taking
disagreement and measurement error into account. In this version of the variable, used in the QoG
dataset, V-Dem has linearly translated the measurement model point estimates back to the original
ordinal scale of each variable as an interval measure.
308
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Participatory democracy index. Question: To what extent is the ideal of participatory democracy
achieved?
309
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Electoral democracy index. Question: To what extent is the ideal of electoral democracy in its
fullest sense achieved?
Clarifications: The electoral principle of democracy seeks to embody the core value of making rulers
responsive to citizens, achieved through electoral competition for the electorate’s approval under
circumstances when suffrage is extensive; political and civil society organizations can operate freely;
elections are clean and not marred by fraud or systematic irregularities; and elections affect the
composition of the chief executive of the country. In between elections, there is freedom of expression
and an independent media capable of presenting alternative views on matters of political relevance.
In the V-Dem conceptual scheme, electoral democracy is understood as an essential element of any
other conception of (representative) democracy - liberal, participatory, deliberative, egalitarian, or
some other. Aggregation: The index is formed by taking the average of, on the one hand, the sum of
the indices measuring freedom of association (thick), suffrage, clean elections, elected executive (de
jure) and freedom of expression; and, on the other, the five-way interaction between those indices.
This is half way between a straight average and strict multiplication, meaning the average of the two.
It is thus a compromise between the two most well known aggregation formulas in the literature,
both allowing "compensation" in one sub-component for lack of polyarchy in the others, but also
punishing countries not strong in one sub-component according to the "weakest link" argument. The
aggregation is done at the level of Dahl’s sub-components (with the one exception of the non-electoral
component).
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
310
4.74 Voter Turnout Database
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
The International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. (2022). Voter turnout
database. https://www.idea.int/data-tools/data/voter-turnout
The Voter Turnout Database is the best resource for a wide array of statistics on voter turnout from
around the world. It contains the most comprehensive global collection of voter turnout statistics from
presidential and parliamentary elections since 1945. Always growing, the database also includes Eu-
ropean Parliament elections, as presented by country using both the number of registered voters and
voting age population as indicators, and in some cases the data includes statistics on spoilt ballot rate.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
311
4.74.2 Presidential Election: Voter Turnout
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
312
4.75 World Development Indicators
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
The primary World Bank collection of development indicators, compiled from officially-recognized
international sources. It presents the most current and accurate global development data available,
and includes national, regional and global estimates
This is an adaptation of an original work by The World Bank. Views and opinions expressed in the
adaptation are the sole responsibility of the author or authors of the adaptation and are not endorsed
by The World Bank.
Access to electricity is the percentage of population with access to electricity. Electrification data are
collected from industry, national surveys and international sources.
313
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Access to electricity, rural is the percentage of rural population with access to electricity.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Access to electricity, urban is the percentage of urban population with access to electricity.
314
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Armed forces personnel are active duty military personnel, including paramilitary forces if the train-
ing, organization, equipment, and control suggest they may be used to support or replace regular
military forces. Labor force comprises all people who meet the International Labour Organization’s
definition of the economically active population.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
315
4.75.5 Age dependency ratio (% of working-age pop.)
Age dependency ratio is the ratio of dependents–people younger than 15 or older than 64–to the
working-age population–those ages 15-64. Data are shown as the proportion of dependents per 100
working-age population.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Clean energy is noncarbohydrate energy that does not produce carbon dioxide when generated. It
includes hydropower and nuclear, geothermal, and solar power, among others.
Available in Time-series
316
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Arable land includes land defined by the FAO as land under temporary crops (double-cropped areas
are counted once), temporary meadows for mowing or for pasture, land under market or kitchen
gardens, and land temporarily fallow. Land abandoned as a result of shifting cultivation is excluded.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
317
4.75.8 Land area (sq. km)
Land area is a country’s total area, excluding area under inland water bodies, national claims to
continental shelf, and exclusive economic zones. In most cases the definition of inland water bodies
includes major rivers and lakes.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Exports - Arms transfers cover the supply of military weapons through sales, aid, gifts, and those
made through manufacturing licenses. Data cover major conventional weapons such as aircraft, ar-
mored vehicles, artillery, radar systems, missiles, and ships designed for military use. Excluded are
transfers of other military equipment such as small arms and light weapons, trucks, small artillery,
ammunition, support equipment, technology transfers, and other services.
318
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Imports - Arms transfers cover the supply of military weapons through sales, aid, gifts, and those
made through manufacturing licenses. Data cover major conventional weapons such as aircraft, ar-
mored vehicles, artillery, radar systems, missiles, and ships designed for military use. Excluded are
transfers of other military equipment such as small arms and light weapons, trucks, small artillery,
ammunition, support equipment, technology transfers, and other services.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
319
4.75.11 Birth rate, crude (per 1,000 people)
Crude birth rate indicates the number of live births occurring during the year, per 1,000 popula-
tion estimated at midyear. Subtracting the crude death rate from the crude birth rate provides the
rate of natural increase, which is equal to the rate of population change in the absence of migration.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Bribery incidence is the percentage of firms experiencing at least one bribe payment request across
six public transactions dealing with utilities access, permits, licenses, and taxes.
Available in Cross-section
320
Overall country availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Fixed broadband subscriptions refers to fixed subscriptions to high-speed access to the public Internet
(a TCP/IP connection), at downstream speeds equal to, or greater than, 256 kbit/s. This includes
cable modem, DSL, fiber-to-the-home/building, other fixed (wired)-broadband subscriptions, satel-
lite broadband and terrestrial fixed wireless broadband. This total is measured irrespective of the
method of payment. It excludes subscriptions that have access to data communications (including the
Internet) via mobile-cellular networks. It should include fixed WiMAX and any other fixed wireless
technologies. It includes both residential subscriptions and subscriptions for organizations.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
321
4.75.14 New business density (new registrations per 1,000 people ages 15-64)
New businesses registered are the number of new limited liability corporations registered in the
calendar year.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions stem from the burning of fossil fuels and the manufacture of ce-
ment. They include carbon dioxide produced during consumption of solid, liquid, and gas fuels and
gas flaring.
322
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Crude death rate indicates the number of deaths occurring during the year, per 1,000 population
estimated at midyear. Subtracting the crude death rate from the crude birth rate provides the rate
of natural increase, which is equal to the rate of population change in the absence of migration.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
323
4.75.17 Central government debt, total (% of GDP)
Debt is the entire stock of direct government fixed-term contractual obligations to others outstanding
on a particular date. It includes domestic and foreign liabilities such as currency and money deposits,
securities other than shares, and loans. It is the gross amount of government liabilities reduced by
the amount of equity and financial derivatives held by the government. Because debt is a stock rather
than a flow, it is measured as of a given date, usually the last day of the fiscal year.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
324
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
325
Renewable electricity is the share of electrity generated by renewable power plants in total electricity
generated by all types of plants.
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Sources of electricity refer to the inputs used to generate electricity. Coal refers to all coal and
brown coal, both primary (including hard coal and lignite-brown coal) and derived fuels (including
patent fuel, coke oven coke, gas coke, coke oven gas, and blast furnace gas). Peat is also included in
this category.
Available in Time-series
326
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Sources of electricity refer to the inputs used to generate electricity. Gas refers to natural gas but
excludes natural gas liquids.
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
327
4.75.23 Electricity production from hydroelectric sources (% of total)
Sources of electricity refer to the inputs used to generate electricity. Hydropower refers to electricity
produced by hydroelectric power plants.
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Sources of electricity refer to the inputs used to generate electricity. Nuclear power refers to electricity
produced by nuclear power plants.
Available in Time-series
328
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Sources of electricity refer to the inputs used to generate electricity. Oil refers to crude oil and
petroleum products.
Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
329
4.75.26 Employers, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO)
Employers refers are those workers who, working on their own account or with one or a few partners,
hold the type of jobs defined as a "self-employment jobs" i.e. jobs where the remuneration is directly
dependent upon the profits derived from the goods and services produced, and, in this capacity, have
engaged, on a continuous basis, one or more persons to work for them as employee(s). Modeled ILO
estimate.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
330
Available in Cross-section Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
331
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
332
4.75.30 Employment in industry (% of total employment) (modeled ILO)
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
333
Available in Cross-section Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
334
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
335
4.75.34 Employment in services, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO)
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
336
Available in Cross-section Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Net energy imports are estimated as energy use less production, both measured in oil equivalents. A
negative value indicates that the country is a net exporter. Energy use refers to use of primary energy
before transformation to other end-use fuels, which is equal to indigenous production plus imports
and stock changes, minus exports and fuels supplied to ships and aircraft engaged in international
transport.
Available in Time-series
337
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Note: The value for Tuvalu in 1997 has been recoded to missing due to an extreme and very unlikely
value.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Total general (local, regional and central) government expenditure on education (current, capital, and
transfers), expressed as a percentage of total general government expenditure on all sectors (including
health, education, social services, etc.). It includes expenditure funded by transfers from international
sources to government. Public education expenditure includes spending by local/municipal, regional
and national governments (excluding household contributions) on educational institutions (both pub-
lic and private), education administration, and subsidies for private entities (students/households
and other privates entities). In some instances data on total public expenditure on education refers
only to the ministry of education and can exclude other ministries that spend a part of their bud-
get on educational activities. The indicator is calculated by dividing total public expenditure on
338
education incurred by all government agencies/departments by the total government expenditure
and multiplying by 100. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website:
http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
339
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
340
4.75.41 Expenditure on tertiary education (% of government expenditure on edu.)
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Military expenditure (% of GDP). Military expenditures data from SIPRI are derived from the
NATO definition, which includes all current and capital expenditures on the armed forces, including
peacekeeping forces; defense ministries and other government agencies engaged in defense projects;
paramilitary forces, if these are judged to be trained and equipped for military operations; and mil-
itary space activities. Such expenditures include military and civil personnel, including retirement
pensions of military personnel and social services for personnel; operation and maintenance; procure-
ment; military research and development; and military aid (in the military expenditures of the donor
country). Excluded are civil defense and current expenditures for previous military activities, such as
for veterans’ benefits, demobilization, conversion, and destruction of weapons. This definition cannot
341
be applied for all countries, however, since that would require much more detailed information than is
available about what is included in military budgets and off-budget military expenditure items. (For
example, military budgets might or might not cover civil defense, reserves and auxiliary forces, police
and paramilitary forces, dual-purpose forces such as military and civilian police, military grants in
kind, pensions for military personnel, and social security contributions paid by one part of government
to another).
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Foreign direct investment are the net inflows of investment to acquire a lasting management in-
terest (10 percent or more of voting stock) in an enterprise operating in an economy other than that
of the investor. It is the sum of equity capital, reinvestment of earnings, other long-term capital,
and short-term capital as shown in the balance of payments. This series shows net inflows (new
investment inflows less disinvestment) in the reporting economy from foreign investors, and is divided
by GDP.
342
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Foreign direct investment are the net outflows of investment to acquire a lasting management in-
terest (10 percent or more of voting stock) in an enterprise operating in an economy other than that
of the investor. It is the sum of equity capital, reinvestment of earnings, other long-term capital, and
short-term capital as shown in the balance of payments. This series shows net outflows of investment
from the reporting economy to the rest of the world and is divided by GDP.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
343
4.75.45 Fertility rate, total (births per woman)
Total fertility rate represents the number of children that would be born to a woman if she were
to live to the end of her childbearing years and bear children in accordance with age-specific fertility
rates of the specified year.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Firms with female top manager refers to the percentage of firms in the private sector who have
females as top managers. Top manager refers to the highest ranking manager or CEO of the estab-
lishment. This person may be the owner if he/she works as the manager of the firm. The results are
based on surveys of more than 100,000 private firms.
Available in Cross-section
344
Overall country availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Firms expected to give gifts in meetings with tax officials is the percentage of firms that answered
positively to the question ’Was a gift or informal payment expected or requested during a meeting
with tax officials?’.
Available in Cross-section
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
345
4.75.48 Forest area (% of land area)
Forest area is land under natural or planted stands of trees of at least 5 meters in situ, whether
productive or not, and excludes tree stands in agricultural production systems (for example, in fruit
plantations and agroforestry systems) and trees in urban parks and gardens.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Fossil fuel energy consumption as a percentage of total energy consumption. Fossil fuel comprises
coal, oil, petroleum, and natural gas products.
Available in Time-series
346
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Agriculture corresponds to ISIC divisions 1-5 and includes forestry, hunting, and fishing, as well
as cultivation of crops and livestock production. Value added is the net output of a sector after
adding up all outputs and subtracting intermediate inputs. It is calculated without making deduc-
tions for depreciation of fabricated assets or depletion and degradation of natural resources. The
origin of value added is determined by the International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC),
revision 3 or 4.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
347
4.75.51 GDP per capita (constant 2015 US dollar)
GDP per capita is gross domestic product divided by midyear population. GDP is the sum of
gross value added by all resident producers in the economy plus any product taxes and minus any
subsidies not included in the value of the products. It is calculated without making deductions for
depreciation of fabricated assets or for depletion and degradation of natural resources. Data are in
constant 2015 U.S. dollars.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
GDP per capita based on purchasing power parity (PPP). PPP GDP is gross domestic product
converted to international dollars using purchasing power parity rates. An international dollar has
the same purchasing power over GDP as the U.S. dollar has in the United States. GDP at purchaser’s
prices is the sum of gross value added by all resident producers in the economy plus any product taxes
and minus any subsidies not included in the value of the products. It is calculated without making
deductions for depreciation of fabricated assets or for depletion and degradation of natural resources.
Data are in constant 2017 international dollars.
348
Available in Cross-section Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Industry corresponds to ISIC divisions 10-45 and includes manufacturing (ISIC divisions 15-37).
It comprises value added in mining, manufacturing (also reported as a separate subgroup), construc-
tion, electricity, water, and gas. Value added is the net output of a sector after adding up all outputs
and subtracting intermediate inputs. It is calculated without making deductions for depreciation of
fabricated assets or depletion and degradation of natural resources. The origin of value added is
determined by the International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC), revision 3. Note: For VAB
countries, gross value added at factor cost is used as the denominator.
349
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Total enrollment in primary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the popu-
lation of official primary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and
under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
350
4.75.55 School enrollment, preprimary (% gross)
Total enrollment in pre-primary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the to-
tal population of official pre-primary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of
over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Total enrollment in secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the pop-
ulation of official secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged
and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.
351
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Total enrollment in tertiary education (ISCED 5 to 8), regardless of age, expressed as a percent-
age of the total population of the five-year age group following on from secondary school leaving.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
352
4.75.58 Gini index
Gini index measures the extent to which the distribution of income (or, in some cases, consumption
expenditure) among individuals or households within an economy deviates from a perfectly equal
distribution. A Lorenz curve plots the cumulative percentages of total income received against the
cumulative number of recipients, starting with the poorest individual or household. The Gini index
measures the area between the Lorenz curve and a hypothetical line of absolute equality, expressed as
a percentage of the maximum area under the line. Thus a Gini index of 0 represents perfect equality,
while an index of 100 implies perfect inequality.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Intentional homicides are estimates of unlawful homicides purposely inflicted as a result of domestic
disputes, interpersonal violence, violent conflicts over land resources, intergang violence over turf or
control, and predatory violence and killing by armed groups. Intentional homicide does not include
all intentional killing; the difference is usually in the organization of the killing. Individuals or small
groups usually commit homicide, whereas killing in armed conflict is usually committed by fairly
cohesive groups of up to several hundred members and is thus usually excluded.
353
Available in Cross-section Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with disasters (number of people). In-
ternally displaced persons are defined according to the 1998 Guiding Principles (http://www.internal-
displacement.org/publications/1998/ocha-guiding-principles-on-internal-displacement) as people or groups
of people who have been forced or obliged to flee or to leave their homes or places of habitual resi-
dence, in particular as a result of armed conflict, or to avoid the effects of armed conflict, situations
of generalized violence, violations of human rights, or natural or human-made disasters and who
have not crossed an international border. "New Displacement" refers to the number of new cases or
incidents of displacement recorded, rather than the number of people displaced. This is done because
people may have been displaced more than once.
354
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with conflict and violence (number of cases).
Internally displaced persons are defined according to the 1998 Guiding Principles (http://www.internal-
displacement.org/publications/1998/ocha-guiding-principles-on-internal-displacement) as people or groups
of people who have been forced or obliged to flee or to leave their homes or places of habitual resi-
dence, in particular as a result of armed conflict, or to avoid the effects of armed conflict, situations
of generalized violence, violations of human rights, or natural or human-made disasters and who
have not crossed an international border. "New Displacement" refers to the number of new cases or
incidents of displacement recorded, rather than the number of people displaced. This is done because
people may have been displaced more than once.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
355
4.75.62 Internally displaced persons, total displaced by conflict-violence (number)
Internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with conflict and violence (number of peo-
ple). Internally displaced persons are defined according to the 1998 Guiding Principles (http://www.internal-
displacement.org/publications/1998/ocha-guiding-principles-on-internal-displacement) as people or groups
of people who have been forced or obliged to flee or to leave their homes or places of habitual resi-
dence, in particular as a result of armed conflict, or to avoid the effects of armed conflict, situations
of generalized violence, violations of human rights, or natural or human-made disasters and who
have not crossed an international border. "People displaced" refers to the number of people living in
displacement as of the end of each year.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Informal payments to public officials are the percentage of firms expected to make informal pay-
ments to public officials to "get things done" with regard to customs, taxes, licenses, regulations,
services, and the like.
356
Available in Cross-section
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Internet users are individuals who have used the Internet (from any location) in the last 3 months.
The Internet can be used via a computer, mobile phone, personal digital assistant, games machine,
digital TV etc.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
357
4.75.65 Labor force, female (% of total labor force)
Female labor force as a percentage of the total show the extent to which women are active in the
labor force. Labor force comprises people ages 15 and older who meet the International Labour
Organization’s definition of the economically active population.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Life expectancy at birth indicates the number of years a newborn infant would live if prevailing
patterns of mortality at the time of its birth were to stay the same throughout its life.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Life expectancy at birth for females indicates the number of years a newborn infant would live if
prevailing patterns of mortality at the time of its birth were to stay the same throughout its life.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
359
4.75.68 Life expectancy at birth, male (years)
Life expectancy at birth for males indicates the number of years a newborn infant would live if
prevailing patterns of mortality at the time of its birth were to stay the same throughout its life.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Percentage of the population age 15 and above who can, with understanding, read and write a
short, simple statement on their everyday life. Generally, ’literacy’ also encompasses ’numeracy’, the
ability to make simple arithmetic calculations. This indicator is calculated by dividing the number
of literates aged 15 years and over by the corresponding age group population and multiplying the
result by 100.
360
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Percentage of the female population age 15 and above who can, with understanding, read and write a
short, simple statement on their everyday life. Generally, ’literacy’ also encompasses ’numeracy’, the
ability to make simple arithmetic calculations. This indicator is calculated by dividing the number
of literates aged 15 years and over by the corresponding age group population and multiplying the
result by 100.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
361
4.75.71 Literacy rate, adult male (% of males ages 15 and above)
Percentage of the male population age 15 and above who can, with understanding, read and write a
short, simple statement on their everyday life. Generally, ’literacy’ also encompasses ’numeracy’, the
ability to make simple arithmetic calculations. This indicator is calculated by dividing the number
of literates aged 15 years and over by the corresponding age group population and multiplying the
result by 100.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Number of people age 15 to 24 years who can both read and write with understanding a short
simple statement on their everyday life, divided by the population in that age group. Generally,
’literacy’ also encompasses ’numeracy’, the ability to make simple arithmetic calculations. Divide the
number of people aged 15 to 24 years who are literate by the total population in the same age group
and multiply the result by 100.
362
Available in Cross-section Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Net migration is the net total of migrants during the period, that is, the total number of immigrants
less the annual number of emigrants, including both citizens and noncitizens. Data are five-year
estimates.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
363
4.75.74 School enrollment, primary (% net)
Net enrollment rate is the ratio of children of official school age who are enrolled in school to the
population of the corresponding official school age. Primary education provides children with basic
reading, writing, and mathematics skills along with an elementary understanding of such subjects as
history, geography, natural science, social science, art, and music.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Net enrollment rate is the ratio of children of official school age who are enrolled in school to the
population of the corresponding official school age. Secondary education completes the provision
of basic education that began at the primary level, and aims at laying the foundations for lifelong
learning and human development, by offering more subject- or skill-oriented instruction using more
specialized teachers.
364
Available in Cross-section Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Total population is based on the de facto definition of population, which counts all residents re-
gardless of legal status or citizenship. The values shown are midyear estimates.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
365
4.75.77 Population ages 0-14 (% of total population)
Total population between the ages 0 to 14 as a percentage of the total population. Population is
based on the de facto definition of population, which counts all residents regardless of legal status or
citizenship.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Total population between the ages 15 to 64 as a percentage of the total population. Population
is based on the de facto definition of population, which counts all residents regardless of legal status
or citizenship.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Population ages 65 and above as a percentage of the total population. Population is based on the de
facto definition of population, which counts all residents regardless of legal status or citizenship.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
367
4.75.80 Population density (people per sq. km of land area)
Population density is midyear population divided by land area in square kilometers. Population
is based on the de facto definition of population, which counts all residents regardless of legal status
or citizenship–except for refugees not permanently settled in the country of asylum, who are generally
considered part of the population of their country of origin. Land area is a country’s total area, ex-
cluding area under inland water bodies, national claims to continental shelf, and exclusive economic
zones. In most cases the definition of inland water bodies includes major rivers and lakes.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Rural population refers to people living in rural areas as defined by national statistical offices. It
is calculated as the difference between total population and urban population.
368
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Urban population refers to people living in urban areas as defined by national statistical offices.
The data are collected and smoothed by United Nations Population Division.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
369
4.75.83 Refugee population by country or territory of asylum
Refugees are people who are recognized as refugees under the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status
of Refugees or its 1967 Protocol, the 1969 Organization of African Unity Convention Governing the
Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa, people recognized as refugees in accordance with the
UNHCR statute, people granted refugee-like humanitarian status, and people provided temporary
protection. Asylum seekers–people who have applied for asylum or refugee status and who have not
yet received a decision or who are registered as asylum seekers–are excluded. Palestinian refugees are
people (and their descendants) whose residence was Palestine between June 1946 and May 1948 and
who lost their homes and means of livelihood as a result of the 1948 Arab-Israeli conflict. Country
of asylum is the country where an asylum claim was filed and granted.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Refugees are people who are recognized as refugees under the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status
of Refugees or its 1967 Protocol, the 1969 Organization of African Unity Convention Governing the
Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa, people recognized as refugees in accordance with the
UNHCR statute, people granted refugee-like humanitarian status, and people provided temporary
protection. Asylum seekers–people who have applied for asylum or refugee status and who have not
yet received a decision or who are registered as asylum seekers–are excluded. Palestinian refugees are
people (and their descendants) whose residence was Palestine between June 1946 and May 1948 and
who lost their homes and means of livelihood as a result of the 1948 Arab-Israeli conflict. Country
of origin generally refers to the nationality or country of citizenship of a claimant.
370
Type of variable: Discrete
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Self-employed workers are those workers who, working on their own account or with one or a few part-
ners or in cooperative, hold the type of jobs defined as a "self-employment jobs". i.e. jobs where the
remuneration is directly dependent upon the profits derived from the goods and services produced.
Self-employed workers include four sub-categories of employers, own-account workers, members of
producers’ cooperatives, and contributing family workers. Modeled ILO estimate.
371
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Prevalence of smoking, female is the percentage of women ages 15 and over who smoke any form
of tobacco, including cigarettes, cigars, pipes or any other smoked tobacco products. Data include
daily and non-daily or occasional smoking.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
372
4.75.87 Smoking prevalence, males (% of adults)
Prevalence of smoking, male is the percentage of men ages 15 and over who smoke any form of
tobacco, including cigarettes, cigars, pipes or any other smoked tobacco products. Data include daily
and non-daily or occasional smoking.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Social protection and labor assess government policies in social protection and labor market reg-
ulations that reduce the risk of becoming poor, assist those who are poor to better manage further
risks, and ensure a minimal level of welfare to all people (1=low to 6=high).
373
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector assess the extent to which the ex-
ecutive can be held accountable for its use of funds and for the results of its actions by the electorate
and by the legislature and judiciary, and the extent to which public employees within the executive
are required to account for administrative decisions, use of resources, and results obtained. The three
main dimensions assessed here are the accountability of the executive to oversight institutions and of
public employees for their performance, access of civil society to information on public affairs, and
state capture by narrow vested interests.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
374
4.75.90 Tax revenue (% of GDP)
Tax revenue refers to compulsory transfers to the central government for public purposes. Certain
compulsory transfers such as fines, penalties, and most social security contributions are excluded.
Refunds and corrections of erroneously collected tax revenue are treated as negative revenue.
Note: The value for San Marino for 1995 was extremely high (44326) and has been recoded to missing.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Fixed telephone subscriptions refers to the sum of active number of analogue fixed telephone lines,
voice-over-IP (VoIP) subscriptions, fixed wireless local loop (WLL) subscriptions, ISDN voice-channel
equivalents and fixed public payphones.
375
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Trade is the sum of exports and imports of goods and services measured as a share of gross do-
mestic product.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
376
4.75.93 Unemployment, female (% of female labor force) (modeled ILO)
Unemployment refers to the share of the labor force that is without work but available for and
seeking employment. Female.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Unemployment refers to the share of the labor force that is without work but available for and
seeking employment. Total.
377
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Unemployment refers to the share of the labor force that is without work but available for and
seeking employment. Male.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
378
4.75.96 Unemployment, youth female (% of female labor force 15-24)(modeled ILO)
Youth unemployment refers to the share of the labor force ages 15-24 without work but available
for and seeking employment.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Youth unemployment refers to the share of the labor force ages 15-24 without work but available
for and seeking employment.
379
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Youth unemployment refers to the share of the labor force ages 15-24 without work but available
for and seeking employment.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
380
4.75.99 Proportion of seats held by women in national parliaments (%)
Women in parliaments are the percentage of parliamentary seats in a single or lower chamber held
by women.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
381
4.76 World Happiness Index
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Helliwell, J. F., Richard Layard, J. D. S., Neve, J.-E. D., Aknin, L. B., & Wang, S. (2022). World
happiness report 2022
The World Happiness Report is a landmark survey of the state of global happiness that ranks 156
countries by how happy their citizens perceive themselves to be.
National-level average scores for subjective well-being, as measured by answers to the Cantril ladder
question asking people to evaluate the quality of their current lives on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0
represents the worst possible life for them, and 10 the best.
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
382
4.77 World Inequality Database
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
Alvaredo, F., Atkinson, A. B., Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2022). World inequality database.
http://wid.world/data
Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2022). World inequality report 2022. http:
//wid.world/
The World Inequality Database (WID.world) aims to provide open and convenient access to the most
extensive available database on the historical evolution of the world distribution of income and wealth,
both within countries and between countries.
The WID was initially created as the The World Top Incomes Database (WTID) in January 2011
with the aim of providing convenient and free access to all the existing series. The WTID expanded
to include series on income inequality for more than thirty countries, spanning over most of the 20th
and early 21st centuries, with over forty additional countries now under study.
Built to accompany the publishing of the two books Top Incomes: a Global Perspective (2010, Oxford
University Press) and Top Incomes over the XX Century (2007, Oxford University Press). The WID
offers the most comprehensive set of historical series on wealth inequality available so far.
Income share of the top 10% of the population. This refers to the share of pre-tax national income
among equal-split adults for the top 10% in each country-year.
The pre-tax national income is the sum of all pre-tax personal income flows accruing to the owners of
the production factors, labor and capital, before taking into account the operation of the tax/transfer
system, but after taking into account the operation of pension system.
The central difference between personal factor income and pre-tax income is the treatment of pensions,
which are counted on a contribution basis by factor income and on a distribution basis by pre-tax
income. The population is comprised of individuals over age 20. The base unit is the individual
(rather than the household) but resources are split equally within couples.
383
Available in Cross-section Available in Time-series
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
Income share of the top 1% of the population. This refers to the share of pre-tax national income
among equal-split adults for the top 1% in each country-year.
The pre-tax national income is the sum of all pre-tax personal income flows accruing to the owners of
the production factors, labor and capital, before taking into account the operation of the tax/transfer
system, but after taking into account the operation of pension system.
The central difference between personal factor income and pre-tax income is the treatment of pensions,
which are counted on a contribution basis by factor income and on a distribution basis by pre-tax
income. The population is comprised of individuals over age 20. The base unit is the individual
(rather than the household) but resources are split equally within couples.
384
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
385
4.78 World Press Freedom Index
If you use any of these variables, make sure to cite the original source and QoG Data. Our
suggested citation for this dataset is:
The Reporters Without Borders World Press Freedom Index ranks the performance of 180 countries
according to a range of criteria that include media pluralism and independence, respect for the safety
and freedom of journalists, and the legislative, institutional and infrastructural environment in which
the media operate.
Press Freedom Index, using the methodology of the 2022 report. The Press Freedom Index mea-
sures the amount of freedom journalists, and the media have in each country, and the efforts made
by governments to see that press freedom is respected. It does not take account of all human rights
violations, only those that affect press freedom. Neither is it an indicator of the quality of a country’s
media.
Note: Higher scores indicate that country has more press freedom.
386
Overall country availability Time-series availability
Find more information about this variable in the QoG Data Finder
387
5 Bibliography
References
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development:
An empirical investigation. The American Economic Review, 91 (5), 1369–1401.
Alvaredo, F., Atkinson, A. B., Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2022). World inequality database. http :
//wid.world/data
Armingeon, K., Engler, S., & Leemann, L. (2022). Comparative political data set 1960-2020.
Barro, R. J., & Lee, J. W. (2013). A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010.
Journal of Development Economics, 104, 184–198.
Bayer, Markus and Paul Rohleder. (2022). Global Militarization Index 2022. Bonn International Cen-
ter for Conversion BICC. https://gmi.bicc.de/
Boix, C., Miller, M. K., & Rosato, S. (2013). A complete data set of political regimes, 1800-2007.
Comparative Political Studies, 46 (12), 1523–54.
Boix, C., Miller, M. K., & Rosato, S. (2022). Boix-miller-rosato dichotomous coding of democ-
racy, 1800-2020 [UNF:6:6u8JNSHqP+yYKbLzrgFDug== [fileUNF]]. Harvard Dataverse, V1.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/FENWWR
Bolt, J., & van Zanden, J. L. (2020). Maddison project database, version 2020 [Maddison style es-
timates of the evolution of the world economy: A new 2020 update]. https://www.rug.nl/
ggdc/historicaldevelopment/maddison/research
Bormann, N.-C., & Golder, M. (2022). Democratic electoral systems around the world, 1946–2020.
Electoral Studies, Forthcoming.
Brambor, T., Goenaga, A., Lindvall, J., & JanTeorell. (2020). The lay of the land: Information
capacity and the state. Comparative Political Studies, 53 (2), 175–213. https://doi.org/10.
1177/0010414019843432
Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2022). World inequality report 2022. http://wid.
world/
Cheibub, J. A., Gandhi, J., & Vreeland, J. R. (2010). Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public
Choice, 143 (1-2), 67–101.
Cingranelli, D. L., Filippov, M., & Mark, S. (2019). The CIRIGHTS dataset [Version 2019.07.21].
The Binghamton University Human Right Institute. www.binghamton.edu/institutes/hri
Cingranelli, D. L., Richards, D. L., & Clay, K. C. (2014). The CIRI Human Rights Dataset [Version
2014.04.14]. CIRI Human Rights Data Project, 6.
Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Knutsen, C. H., Lindberg, S. I., Teorell, J., Alizada, N., Altman, D.,
Bernhard, M., Cornell, A., Fish, M. S., Gastaldi, L., Gjerløw, H., Glynn, A., Hicken, A.,
Hindle, G., Ilchenko, N., Krusell, J., Luhrmann, A., Maerz, S. F., . . . Ziblatt, D. (2022).
V-dem [country-year/country-date] dataset v12. https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemds22
Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2022). United nations e-government survey. https :
//publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2022
Donner, S., Hartmann, H., Härterich, C., & Steinkamp, S. (2022). Transformation index of the ber-
telsmann stiftung 2022. Bertelsmann Stiftung. http://www.bti-project.org
Dreher, A. (2006). Does globalization affect growth? evidence from a new index of globalization.
Applied Economics, 38 (10), 1091–1110.
Elkins, Z., & Ginsburg, T. (2021). Characteristics of national constitutions, version 3.0 [Last modified:
May 20, 2021. Available at comparativeconstitutionsproject.org]. http://www.comparativeconstitutionsproject
org
Ensheng, D., Du, H., & Gardner, L. (2020). An interactive web-based dashboard to track covid-19 in
real time. The Lancet, 20 (5), 533–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30120-1
EVS. (2020). European Values Study 2017: Integrated Dataset (EVS 2017). https://doi.org/10.4232/
1.13560
EVS. (2021). EVS Trend File 1981-2017. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13736
Fazekas, M., & Kocsis, G. (2020). Uncovering high-level corruption: Cross-national objective cor-
ruption risk indicators using public procurement data. https : / / doi . org / doi : 10 . 1017 /
S0007123417000461
388
Feenstra, R. C., Inklaar, R., & Timmer, M. P. (2015). The next generation of the penn world table.
The American Economic Review, 105 (10), 3150–3182. www.ggdc.net/pwt
Finnish Social Science Data Archive [producer and distributor]. (2019). Measures of democracy 1810-
2018 [codebook] [Version 8.0].
Forman–Rabinovici, A., & Sommer, U. (2018). Reproductive health policymakers: Comparing the in-
fluences of international and domestic institutions on abortion policy. Public Administration,
96 (1), 185–199.
Fox, J. (2008). A world survey of religion and the state. Cambridge University Press.
Fox, J. (2015). Political secularism, religion, and the state: A time series analysis of worldwide data.
Cambridge University Press.
Fox, J. (2016). The unfree exercise of religion: A world survey of religious discrimination against
religious minorities. NY: Cambridge University Pres.
Fox, J. (2017). Religion and state dataset: Round 3. http://www.religionandstate.org/
Fox, J. (2019). A world survey of secular-religious competition: State religion policy from 1990 to
2014. Religion, State and Society, 47 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2018.1532750
Fox, J., Finke, R., & Mataic, D. R. (2018). New data and measures on societal discrimination and
religious minorities. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, 2 (14).
Freedom House. (2017). Freedom of the press 2017. https : / / freedomhouse . org / report / freedom -
press/freedom-press-2017
Freedom House. (2022a). Freedom in the world 2022. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world
Freedom House. (2022b). Freedom on the net 2022: Countering an authoritarian overhaul of the
internet. https:// freedomhouse .org / report /freedom - net /2022 / countering- authoritarian -
overhaul-internet
Garnett, H. A., James, T. S., & MacGregor, M. (2022). Perceptions of Electoral Integrity, (PEI-8.0)
[V1, UNF:6:lINJ6KG6BcEwGIXz7tM4Yg== [fileUNF]]. https : / / doi . org / 10 . 7910 / DVN /
YSNYXD
Garriga, A. C. (2016). Central bank independence in the world: A new dataset. International Inter-
actions, 42 (5), 849–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2016.1188813
Geddes, B., Wright, J., & Frantz, E. (2014). Autocratic breakdown and regime transitions: A new
data set. Perspectives on Politics, 12 (2), 313–331.
Gibney, M., Cornett, L., Wood, R., Haschke, P., Arnon, D., Pisanò, A., Barrett, G., & Park, B.
(2020). The political terror scale 1976-2019 [Data retrieved from the Political Terror Scale
website]. http://www.politicalterrorscale.org
Gleditsch, K., & Ward, M. D. (1999). Interstate system membership: A revised list of the independent
states since 1816. International Interactions, 25, 393–413.
Gleditsch, K. S. (2002). Expanded trade and GDP data (version 6.0). Journal of Conflict Resolution,
46 (5), 712–724.
Global Footprint Network. (2019). National footprint and biocapacity accounts (1961-2016), 2019
edition [Date accessed: 21 October 2020]. https://data.footprintnetwork.org
Gwartney, J., Lawson, R., Hall, J., & Murphy, R. (2022). Economic Freedom Dataset, published
in Economic Freedom of the World: 2022 Annual Report. Fraser Institute. https://www.
fraserinstitute.org/economic-freedom/dataset
Gygli, S., Haelg, F., Potrafke, N., & Sturm, J.-E. (2019). The KOF Globalisation Index - Revisited.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2
Hadenius, A., & Teorell, J. (2007). Pathways from authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 18 (1),
143–157.
Haerpfer, C., Inglehart, R., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., Lagos, M., Norris,
P., Ponarin, E., & et al., B. P. (2021). World Values Survey Time-Series (1981-2020) Cross-
National Data-Set: Data File Version 2.0.0. https://doi.org/10.14281/18241.15
Haerpfer, C., Inglehart, R., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., J., D.-M., M. Lagos, P. N., Ponarin,
E., & B. Puranen, e. a. (2020). World Values Survey: Round Seven Country-Pooled Datafile.
http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV7.jsp
Halpern, B., Longo, C., Hardy, D., McLeod, K., Samhouri, J., & Steven Katona, e. a. (2012). An
index to assess the health and benefits of the global ocean. Nature, 488, 615–620. https :
//doi.org/10.1038/nature11397
Halpern, B., Longo, C., Hardy, D., McLeod, K., Samhouri, J., & Steven Katona, e. a. (2018). Ocean
health index [Date accessed: 07 December 2021]. https : / / github . com / OHI - Science / ohi -
global/releases
389
Helliwell, J. F., Richard Layard, J. D. S., Neve, J.-E. D., Aknin, L. B., & Wang, S. (2022). World
happiness report 2022.
Henisz, W. J. (2002). The institutional environment for infrastructure investment. Industrial and
Corporate Change, 11 (2).
Henisz, W. J. (2017). The Political Constraint Index (POLCON) Dataset 2017 release. https://mgmt.
wharton.upenn.edu/profile/1327
Hollyer, J. R., Rosendorff, B. P., & Vreeland, J. R. (2014). Measuring transparency. Political Analysis,
22 (4), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpu001
Hyde, S. D., & Marinov, N. (2012). Which elections can be lost? Political Analysis, 20 (2), 191–201.
Hyde, S. D., & Marinov, N. (2021). Codebook for national elections across democracy and autocracy
dataset, 5.0. https://nelda.co/
Index, O. H. (2022). Global scenarios data for ocean health index [Date accessed: 09 December 2022].
https://github.com/OHI-Science/ohi-global/releases
Institute for Economics and Peace. (2022a). Global terrorism index 2022: Measuring the impact of
terrorism [Accessed 01-09-2022]. http://visionofhumanity.org/resources
Institute for Economics and Peace. (2022b). Global peace index 2022: Measuring peace in a complex
world [Accessed 01-09-2022]. http://visionofhumanity.org/resources
International, T. (2017). Global corruption barometer 9th edition. https://www.transparency.org/
research/gcb
International Budget Partnership. (2019). Open budget survey data [Accessed on 2021-12-01]. https:
//www.internationalbudget.org/data-evidence/
International Monetary Fund. (2022). Government finance statistics - expenditure by function of
government (cofog). https://data.imf.org/?sk=388dfa60- 1d26- 4ade- b505- a05a558d9a42&
sId=1479329132316
Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2022). Parline database: Monthly ranking of women in national parlia-
ments. https://data.ipu.org/women-ranking
Johnson, J. W., & Wallack, J. S. (2012). Electoral systems and the personal vote. https://doi.org/
1902.1/17901
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: A summary
of methodology, data and analytical issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 5430.
Lee, J.-W., & Lee, H. (2016). Human capital in the long run. Journal of Development Economics,
122, 147–169.
Leeds, B., Ashley, J., Ritter, S. M., McLaughlin, M., & Long, A. G. (2002). Alliance treaty obligations
and provisions, 1815–1944. International Interactions, 28, 237–260.
LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg. (2022). Lis inequality and poverty key figures [Ac-
cessed on 2022-12-12]. https://www.lisdatacenter.org/download-key-figures/
Marshall, M. G., & Elzinga-Marshall, G. (2017). Global report 2017: Conflict, governance, and state
fragility.
Marshall, M. G., & Gurr, T. R. (2020). Polity v project, political regime characteristics and transitions,
1800-2018.
Mo Ibrahim Foundation. (2020). The Ibrahim Index of African Governance. http : / / mo . ibrahim .
foundation/iiag/
Niklasson, B., & Towns, A. E. (2022). The gendip dataset on gender and diplomatic representation,
version june21.
NSD - Norwegian Centre for Research Data. (2020). European social survey cumulative file, ess 1-9
[Date accessed: 17 February 2021]. https://doi.org/10.21338/NSD-ESS-CUMULATIVE
Nunn, N., & Puga, D. (2012). Ruggedness: The blessing of bad geography in Africa. Review of
Economics and Statistics, 94 (1), 20–36.
Ouattara, B., & Standaert, S. (2020). Property rights revisited. European Journal of Political Econ-
omy, 64, 101895. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101895
Pemstein, D., Marquardt, K. L., Tzelgov, E., Wang, Y.-t., Medzihorsky, J., Krusell, J., Miri, F., & von
Römer, J. (2022). The V-Dem measurement model: Latent variable analysis for cross-national
and cross-temporal expert-coded data.
Project, W. J. (2022). WJP Rule of Law Index 2022.
Reporters sans frontières. (2022). World press freedom index. https://rsf.org/en/index
Romelli, D. (2022). The political economy of reforms in central bank design: Evidence from a new
dataset. Economic Policy, 37, 641–688. https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiac011
390
Ross, M., & Mahdavi, P. (2015). Oil and gas data, 1932-2014. https : / / doi . org / 10 . 7910 / DVN /
ZTPW0Y
Schiller, C., & Hellmann, T. (2022). Sustainable governance indicators 2022 [Date accessed: 03 Oc-
tober 2022]. Bertelsmann Stiftung. https://www.sgi-network.org
Standaert, S. (2015). Divining the level of corruption: A bayesian state-space approach. Journal of
Comparative Economics, 43 (3), 782–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2014.05.007
Struett, T., Zable, A., & Ariel, S. (2022). Global data governance mapping: Year two report. https:
//globaldatagovernancemapping.org/images/DataGov-Year-2/year-two-mapping-report--
07-11-22-.pdf
Teorell, J., & Wahman, M. (2018). Institutional stepping stones for democracy: How and why multi-
partyism enhances democratic change. Democratization, 25 (1), 78–97.
The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. (2015a). CSES MODULE 1 full release [dataset],
december 15, 2015 version. https://doi.org/doi:10.7804/cses.module1.2015-12-15
The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. (2015b). CSES MODULE 2 full release [dataset],
december 15, 2015 version. https://doi.org/doi:10.7804/cses.module2.2015-12-15
The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. (2015c). CSES MODULE 3 full release [dataset], de-
cember 15, 2015 version. https://doi.org/doi:10.7804/cses.module3.2015-12-15
The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. (2018). CSES MODULE 4 full release [dataset], may
29, 2018 version. https://doi.org/doi:10.7804/cses.module4.2018-05-29
The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. (2022). CSES MODULE 5 full release [dataset], march
1, 2022 version. https://doi.org/doi:10.7804/cses.module4.2020-05-14
The International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. (2022). Voter turnout database.
https://www.idea.int/data-tools/data/voter-turnout
The PRS Group et al. (2023). International country risk guide.
The World Bank. (2021). Remittances data. https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/search/dataset/
0038132
The World Bank. (2022). World bank enterprise surveys. https://www.enterprisesurveys.org/en/
enterprisesurveys
Transparency International. (2023). Corruption perception index 2022 [Licensed under CC-BY-ND
4.0]. http://www.transparency.org/cpi
United Nations Development Program. (2022a). Gender inequality index. http://hdr.undp.org/en/
content/gender-inequality-index-gii
United Nations Development Program. (2022b). Human development report 2021/2022. https://hdr.
undp.org/content/human-development-report-2021-22
Vanhanen, T. (2019). Measures of democracy 1810-2018 [dataset] [Version 8.0]. http://urn.fi/urn:
nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD1289
Wahman, M., Teorell, J., & Hadenius, A. (2013). Authoritarian regime types revisited: Updated data
in comparative perspective. Contemporary Politics, 19 (1), 19–34.
Wig, T., Hegre, H., & Regan, P. M. (2015). Updated data on institutions and elections 1960–2012:
Presenting the iaep dataset version 2.0. Research & Politics, 2 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/
2053168015579120
Williams, A. (2015). A global index of information transparency and accountability. Journal of Com-
parative Economics, 43 (3), 804–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2014.10.004
Wolf, M., W., E. J., C., E. D., de Sherbinin, A., & Wendling, e. a., Z. A. (2022). 2022 environmen-
tal performance index [Date accessed: 17 October 2022]. New Haven, CT: Yale Center for
Environmental Law and Policy. epi.yale.edu
World Bank. (2022). World development indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-
development-indicators
World Economic Forum. (2019). The global competetiveness report 2019 [Commercial use of data
produced by the World Economic Forum is forbidden]. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/
WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2019.pdf
World Health Organization. (2021). Global health observatory data repository [Accessed on 2021-11-
29]. http://www.who.int/gho/en/
391
6 Appendix
392
QoG country QoG ccodealp Data Data Comment
name ccode from to
Costa Rica 188 CRI 1946 2022 Independence from United Provinces of Central America
1847
Cote d’Ivoire 384 CIV 1961 2022 Independence from France 1960
Croatia 191 HRV 1992 2022 Independence 1991
Cuba 192 CUB 1946 2022 Independence from the United States 1902
Cyprus (-1974) 993 CYP 1961 1974 Independence from the UK 1960
Cyprus (1975-) 196 CYP 1975 2022 Division of the island 1974
Czech Republic 203 CZE 1993 2022 Dissolution of Czechoslovakia 1993
Czechoslovakia 200 CSK 1946 1992 Independence 1918, Liberation 1945
Denmark 208 DNK 1946 2022 Consolidaton 8th century
Djibouti 262 DJI 1977 2022 Independence from France 1977
Dominica 212 DMA 1979 2022 Independence from the UK 1978
Dominican Republic 214 DOM 1946 2022 Independence from Spain 1865
Ecuador 218 ECU 1946 2022 Independence from Gran Colombia 1830
Egypt 818 EGY 1946 2022 Indepencence from the UK 1922
El Salvador 222 SLV 1946 2022 Independence from the Greater Republic of Central Amer-
ica 1898
Equatorial Guinea 226 GNQ 1969 2022 Independence from Spain 1968
Eritrea 232 ERI 1993 2022 Independence from Ethiopia 1993
Estonia 233 EST 1992 2022 Independence restored 1991
Eswatini (formerly 748 SWZ 1969 2022 Independence from British mandate 1968
Swaziland)
Ethiopia (-1992) 230 ETH 1946 1992 Empire of Ethiopia 1137
Ethiopia (1993-) 231 ETH 1993 2022 Eritrean Independence 1993
Fiji 242 FJI 1971 2022 Independence from the UK 1970
Finland 246 FIN 1946 2022 Independence from Soviet Russia recognized 1918
France (-1962) 991 FRA 1946 1962 French Republic 1792
France (1963-) 250 FRA 1963 2022 Algeria Independence from France 1962
Gabon 266 GAB 1961 2022 Independence from France 1960
Gambia 270 GMB 1965 2022 Independence from the UK 1965
Georgia 268 GEO 1992 2022 Independence from the Soviet Union 1991
Germany 276 DEU 1991 2022 Reunification 1990
Germany, East 278 DDR 1950 1990 Established 1949
Germany, West 280 DEU 1949 1990 Established 1949
Ghana 288 GHA 1957 2022 Independence from the British Empire 1957
Greece 300 GRC 1946 2022 Independence from the Ottoman Empire recognized 1830
Grenada 308 GRD 1974 2022 Independence from the UK 1974
Guatemala 320 GTM 1946 2022 Independence from the First Mexican Empire 1823
Guinea 324 GIN 1959 2022 Independence from France 1958
Guinea-Bissau 624 GNB 1975 2022 Independence from Portugal recognized 1974
Guyana 328 GUY 1966 2022 Independence from the UK 1966
Haiti 332 HTI 1946 2022 Independence recognized 1825
Honduras 340 HND 1946 2022 Independence declared as Honduras 1838
Hungary 348 HUN 1946 2022 Secession from Austria-Hungary 1918
Iceland 352 ISL 1946 2022 Kingdom of Iceland 1918
India 356 IND 1948 2022 Independence from the UK (Dominion) 1947
Indonesia 360 IDN 1950 2022 Independence from the Netherlands recognized 1949
393
QoG country QoG ccodealp Data Data Comment
name ccode from to
394
QoG country QoG ccodealp Data Data Comment
name ccode from to
Netherlands 528 NLD 1946 2022 Independence from the Spanish Empire 1815
New Zealand 554 NZL 1948 2022 Statute of Westminster Adoption Act 1947
Nicaragua 558 NIC 1946 2022 Independence from the Federal Republic of Central America
1838
Niger 562 NER 1961 2022 Independence from France 1960
Nigeria 566 NGA 1961 2022 Independence from the UK 1960
Norway 578 NOR 1946 2022 Dissolution of union with Sweden 1905
North Macedonia 807 MKD 1993 2022 Independence from Yugolsavia recognized 1993
Oman 512 OMN 1946 2022 Imamate established 751
Pakistan (-1970) 997 PAK 1948 1970 Independence from the UK 1947
Pakistan (1971-) 586 PAK 1971 2022 Bangladesh independence from Pakistan 1971
Palau 585 PLW 1995 2022 Independence from Compact of Free Association with the
US 1994
Panama 591 PAN 1946 2022 Independence from Colombia 1903
Papua New Guinea 598 PNG 1976 2022 Independence from Australia 1975
Paraguay 600 PRY 1946 2022 Independence from Spain 1811
Peru 604 PER 1946 2022 Independence from Span recognized 1824
Philippines 608 PHL 1947 2022 Independence from the United States 1946
Poland 616 POL 1946 2022 Reconstitution of Poland 1918
Portugal 620 PRT 1946 2022 Independence from Kingdom of Leon recognized 1143
Qatar 634 QAT 1972 2022 Independence from the UK 1971
Romania 642 ROU 1946 2022 Independence from the Ottoman Empire 1878
Russia 643 RUS 1992 2022 Russian Federation 1991
Rwanda 646 RWA 1963 2022 Independence from Belgium 1962
Samoa 882 WSM 1962 2022 Independence from New Zealand 1962
San Marino 674 SMR 1946 2022 Independence from the Roman Empire 301
Sao Tome and 678 STP 1976 2022 Independence from Portugal 1975
Principe
Saudi Arabia 682 SAU 1946 2022 Kingdom founded 1932
Senegal 686 SEN 1961 2022 Withdrawal from the Mali Federation 1960
Serbia 688 SRB 2006 2022 Independent republic 2006
Serbia and Montene- 891 SCG 1992 2005 Established 1992, Dissolution 2006
gro
Seychelles 690 SYC 1976 2022 Independence from the UK 1976
Sierra Leone 694 SLE 1961 2022 Independence from the UK 1961
Singapore 702 SGP 1966 2022 Separation from Malaysia 1965
Slovakia 703 SVK 1993 2022 Independence from Czechoslovakia 1993
Slovenia 705 SVN 1991 2022 Independence from Yugoslavia 1991
Solomon Islands 90 SLB 1979 2022 Independence from the UK 1978
Somalia 706 SOM 1961 2022 Union, Independence and Constitution 1960
South Africa 710 ZAF 1946 2022 The Union of South Africa came into being 1910
South Sudan 728 SSD 2011 2022 Separation from Sudan in 2011
Spain 724 ESP 1946 2022 Nation State 1812
Sri Lanka 144 LKA 1948 2022 Independence from the UK(Dominion) 1948
St Kitts and Nevis 659 KNA 1984 2022 Independence from the UK 1983
St Lucia 662 LCA 1979 2022 Independence from the UK 1979
395
QoG country QoG ccodealp Data Data Comment
name ccode from to
St. Vincent & the 670 VCT 1980 2022 Independence from the UK 1979
Grenadines
Sudan (-2011) 736 SDN 1956 2011 Independence from the UK and Egypt 1956
Sudan (2012-) 729 SDN 2012 2022 South Sudanese independence 2011
Suriname 740 SUR 1976 2022 Independence from the Netherlands 1975
Sweden 752 SWE 1946 2022 Consolidation Middle Ages
Switzerland 756 CHE 1946 2022 Peace of Westphalia 1648
Syria 760 SYR 1946 2022 Independence from France 1946
Taiwan 158 TWN 1950 2022 Kuomintang retreat to Taiwan 1949
Tajikistan 762 TJK 1992 2022 Independence from the Soviet Union 1991
Tanzania 834 TZA 1964 2022 Merger (Tanganyika, Zanzibar and Pemba) 1964
Thailand 764 THA 1946 2022 Rattanakosin Kingdom 1782
Tibet 994 XTI 1946 1950 Independence from Qing Dynasty 1913
Timor-Leste 626 TLS 2002 2022 Independence from Indonesia 2002
Togo 768 TGO 1960 2022 Independence from France 1960
Tonga 776 TON 1970 2022 Independence from British protection 1970
Trinidad and Tobago 780 TTO 1963 2022 Independence from the UK 1962
Tunisia 788 TUN 1956 2022 Independence from France 1956
Turkey 792 TUR 1946 2022 Secession from the Ottoman Empire 1923
Turkmenistan 795 TKM 1992 2022 Independence from the Soviet Union 1991
Tuvalu 798 TUV 1979 2022 Independence from the UK 1978
Uganda 800 UGA 1963 2022 Independence from the UK 1962
Ukraine 804 UKR 1992 2022 Independence from the Soviet Union 1991
United Arab Emi- 784 ARE 1972 2022 UK treaties ended 1971
rates
United Kingdom 826 GBR 1946 2022 Acts of Union 1707
United States 840 USA 1946 2022 Independence from the Kingdom of Great Britain recog-
nized 1783
Uruguay 858 URY 1946 2022 Independence from the Empire of Brazil recognized 1828
USSR 810 SUN 1946 1991 Treaty of Creation 1922, Union dissolved 1991
Uzbekistan 860 UZB 1992 2022 Independence from the Soviet Union 1991
Vanuatu 548 VUT 1981 2022 Independence from France and the UK 1980
Venezuela 862 VEN 1946 2022 Independence from Gran Colombia recognized 1845
Vietnam 704 VNM 1977 2022 Reunification 1976
Vietnam, North 998 VNM 1955 1976 Geneva Accords. Partition of the County, 1954
Vietnam, South 999 VDR 1955 1976 Geneva Accords. Partition of the County, 1954
Yemen 887 YEM 1990 2022 Unification 1990
Yemen, North 886 YEM 1946 1989 Independence from the Ottoman Empire 1918
Yemen, South 720 YMD 1968 1989 Independence from the UK 1967
Yugoslavia 890 YUG 1946 1991 The union of the State of Slovenes, Croats, Serbs & Serbia
est 1918
Zambia 894 ZMB 1965 2022 Independence from the UK 1964
Zimbabwe 716 ZWE 1966 2022 The Unilateral Declarator of Independence (UDI) of Rhode-
sia 1965
396