Business Communication
Business Communication
ASSIGNMENT TOPIC:
WORKING GROUPS AND
TEAMS
SUBMITTED BY – B SAI GAYATHRI, TARUSI SALUJA, BHARTI SARAF, USHASHI MAZUMDER, SURAVITA SEN
ABSTRACT –
This topic examines the intricacies of interpersonal relationships in working groups and teams. It
encompasses emotional intelligence, focusing on managing, preventing, and reappraising emotions
for improved collaboration. The discussion further extends to conflict management, covering
avoidance, accommodation, competition, compromise, and collaboration as strategies to navigate
conflicts effectively. Additionally, it addresses challenges in handling conflict, including self-
enhancing thoughts, destructive messages, serial arguments, physical violence, and seemingly
insurmountable disputes. It also touches on short-term conflict resolution, highlighting the
significance of these elements in fostering team cohesion and productivity.
BODY –
1. Emotional Intelligence:
Introduction -
In 1995 the American Dialect Society (1999) selected Emotional Intelligence as the most useful new
term. The explosion of interest in the construct arose from Daniel Goleman’s (1995) bestseller—
Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More than IQ. This book popularised aspects of the
academic work on emotional intelligence.
According to Mayer, Caruso and Salovey’s (2000) ability model, emotional intelligence refers to the
abilities used to process information about one’s own emotions and the emotions of others. Within
the model, there are four branches:
(1) To perceive and express feelings;
(2) To use emotions and emotional understanding to facilitate thinking;
(3) To understand complex emotions, relationships among emotions, and relationships between
emotions and behavioral consequences; and
SUBMITTED BY – B SAI GAYATHRI, TARUSI SALUJA, BHARTI SARAF, USHASHI MAZUMDER, SURAVITA SEN
According to Fisher's research, the most common negative emotions experienced in the
workplace are as follows:
Frustration/irritation.
Worry/nervousness.
Anger/aggravation.
Dislike.
Disappointment/unhappiness.
This will help with emotions like anxiety, worry, frustration and anger.
Take deep breaths, inhaling and exhaling slowly until you calm down. Slowly count to 10.
You can take a walk to cool down, and listen to some relaxing music.
The 10-second rule
This is especially helpful if you are feeling angry, frustrated or even irate.
If you feel your temper rising, try and count to 10 to recompose yourself.
Be respectful
Treat your colleagues the same way you would like to be treated yourself.
If the person is rude, there’s no need to reciprocate. We can stay gracious and just be firm and
assertive without being aggressive.
Never bring your negative emotions home
It is good practice to let go of any anger, frustration and unhappiness at the end of every
workday.
SUBMITTED BY – B SAI GAYATHRI, TARUSI SALUJA, BHARTI SARAF, USHASHI MAZUMDER, SURAVITA SEN
Constructive conflict can lead to positive outcomes, such as increased creativity, better decision-
making, and improved problem-solving. It encourages members to consider different perspectives
and ideas, fostering innovation within the group.
On the other hand, destructive conflict can be detrimental to group cohesion and productivity. It
may lead to communication breakdowns, reduced trust among team members, and an overall
negative work environment.
Interpersonal communication is crucial within groups and teams because it forms the foundation for
collaboration and coordination. When conflict arises, effective communication becomes even more
important in resolving issues and maintaining a positive team dynamic.
3. Managing Conflict:
The five methodologies are avoidance, accommodation, compromise, competition, and collaboration.
These methodologies can be displayed graphically to show the varying degree of cooperation and
assertiveness each style encompasses.
1. AVOIDANCE:
The avoidance methodology is an uncooperative and unassertive style. People exhibit this style
seek to avoid resolving any conflict altogether by denying a conflict exists. These people are
prone to postponing any decisions in which they should get involved in resolving a conflict.
SUBMITTED BY – B SAI GAYATHRI, TARUSI SALUJA, BHARTI SARAF, USHASHI MAZUMDER, SURAVITA SEN
2. ACCOMMODATION:
The accommodating methodology is cooperative and unassertive. People exhibit this style give in
to what the other side wants, even if it means giving up one’s personal goals.
Accommodation may be an effective strategy if the issue at hand is more important to others as
compared to the person’s personal goals. If a person habitually uses this style, that person may
begin to see that personal interests and well-being are neglected.
3. COMPROMISE:
Compromising involves each person to sacrifice something of value to themselves. The person
compromising may say something like, “Perhaps I ought to reconsider my initial position” or
“Maybe we can both agree to give in a little.”
4. COMPETITION:
The competing methodology is uncooperative and assertive. The people who exhibit a competing
methodology want to reach their goal or get their solution adopted regardless of what others say
or how they feel.
These people are more interested in getting the outcome they want as opposed to keeping the
other party happy and they push for the deal they are interested in making.
A competition methodology can lead to poor relationships with others if one is always seeking to
maximize their own outcomes or beliefs at the expense of the other person’s goals and beliefs.
5. COLLABORATION:
The collaboration methodology is high on both cooperation and assertiveness. This methodology
is used to achieve the best outcome from a conflict with both sides arguing for their position
supporting it with facts and rationale while listening attentively to the other side. The objective in
this methodology is to find a win-win solution to the problem in which both sides get what they
want. Both sides may challenge points or aspects but not challenge each other. They emphasize
problem solving and integration of each other’s goals into an overall solution.
SUBMITTED BY – B SAI GAYATHRI, TARUSI SALUJA, BHARTI SARAF, USHASHI MAZUMDER, SURAVITA SEN
Destructive messages - Destructive conflict flows from unhealthy people and relationships. Where
there is destructive conflict, a person will often find a pattern of cruelty, neglect, deception, control,
indifference and even abuse in the relationship. What differentiates destructive conflict from healthy
disagreement is that it involves a pattern of unhealthy communication. Destructive conflict flows
from individuals who consistently fail to admit their weakness, lie, rationalize, deny, apologize
instead of changing their behavior, blame others instead of “owning” their part of the problem and
who are defensive instead of open to feedback.
Serial Arguments - Serial arguments occur when individuals in a relationship extend an argument
beyond a single episode resulting in multiple argumentative episodes over time about the same
issue. A disadvantage is a negative argument that proves that the affirmative plan is undesirable.
The impact is similar to a harm claim, though the term impact is usually used in the context of the
disadvantage. The disadvantage is the final, end problem that results.
Physical Violence - Violence, an act of physical force that causes or is intended to cause harm. The
damage inflicted by violence may be physical, psychological, or both. Violence may be distinguished
from aggression, a more general type of hostile behavior that may be physical, verbal, or passive in
nature. Violence is a relatively common type of human behavior that occurs throughout the world.
People of any age may be violent, although older adolescents and young adults are most likely to
engage in violent behavior. Violence has a number of negative effects on those who witness
or experience it.
Unresolved conflict - Unresolved or poorly managed conflict is a challenge that many teams wrestle
with. Often when conflict is discussed in teams it’s addressed but not resolved, and it may be
months or even years later when the same issues resurface. One of the challenges with the
resolution of workplace conflicts is that to ensure the agreements and resolution stick, it requires
attitude and behaviour changes from those involved in the resolution conversations.
1. Raise the issue early: Be direct and talk with the other party, even if you're afraid of making
that approach or worry about it worsening the problem. Be assertive and speak openly,
encouraging others to do the same.
2. Manage your emotions: Choose the right timing when talking to someone about the conflict,
as anger may inflame the situation. Stay calm, collect yourself, and ask questions about what you
want to achieve, the issues you're having, and what you would like to see.
SUBMITTED BY – B SAI GAYATHRI, TARUSI SALUJA, BHARTI SARAF, USHASHI MAZUMDER, SURAVITA SEN
4. Practice active listening: Paraphrase the other party's points to show you're listening and
understand them. Look out for non-verbal signals that contradict what they are saying, and use
appropriate body language to show interest and follow them.
BIBLIOGRAPHY –
https://milnepublishing.geneseo.edu/interpersonalcommunication/chapter/9/
https://learn.saylor.org/mod/book/view.php?id=52359
https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/conflict-management
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/5-methods-handle-conflicts-james-jim-dent-lssbb-dtmx2
https://www.healthxchange.sg/men/health-work/managing-emotions-work
https://www.mindtools.com/amqbd0e/managing-your-emotions-at-work
https://www.myworkplacehealth.com/dealing-with-unresolved-conflict-in-the-workplace/
https://debateus.org/debating-disadvantages/
Positive Psychology: The Scientific and Practical Explorations of Human Strengths Shane J. Lopez,
Jennifer Teramoto Pedrotti, C. R. Snyder
[1] [2] [3] Mind Tools interview with Peter A. Glaser, Ph.D. and Susan R. Glaser. Available here.
SUBMITTED BY – B SAI GAYATHRI, TARUSI SALUJA, BHARTI SARAF, USHASHI MAZUMDER, SURAVITA SEN