Everything You Need To Know About Kiln System Operations in Cement Manufacturing - INFINITY FOR CEMENT EQUIPMENT
Everything You Need To Know About Kiln System Operations in Cement Manufacturing - INFINITY FOR CEMENT EQUIPMENT
In the real world, a typical cement plant operates successfully by accomplishing the following processing steps:
To a great extent, operation of the rotary kiln system also determines the quality of the cement produced. Stable
operation of the kiln system will result in improved operational efficiency, higher production rates, and better
quality clinker.It can also result in reduced environmental emissions, a factor of ever-increasing importance.
In the real world, none of these parameters can be held perfectly constant. The object is to control kiln system
inputs as closely as possible, given the limitations of the equipment and the operators’ skill at understanding
and responding to indications that the kiln system provides. The primary parameters that must be controlled as
carefully as possible are:
Kiln feed chemical composition has a large effect on kiln operations. Several of the more impor-tant parameters
are silica ratio, percent liquid, and C3S content (or lime saturation factor, LSF).
Silica ratio. Silica ratio, or silica modulus (SR), has one of the greatest effects on burnability. As silica ratio
increases, kiln feed becomes harder to burn. As silica ratio decreases, kiln feed becomes easier to burn.
Typically, a silica ratio above 3.0 is considered high, and a silica ratio below 2.3 is considered low. All else being
equal, larger diameter kilns (i.e., 4-meter diameter and larger) tend to operate better with a lower silica ratio, and
smaller diameter kilns tend to operate better with a higher silica ratio.
Some kiln feeds may have a silica ratio over 3.0, and be relatively easy to burn for a combination of other
reasons, such as when the mix has a low C3S or LSF. Other factors affect the impact of silica ratio on
burnability, such as the type and size of the silica. Free crystalline silica or quartz (such as from sand) is more
difficult to combine than amorphous silica, or silicates or aluminosilicates from clays or shales. If the silica
grains are coarser, it is more difficult for them to chemically react. Also, note that CaO is not involved in this
silica modulus equation; therefore, lime and its effects are not considered. The same silica ratio could exist with
a large variation in lime content. Silica modulus alone does not tell the complete story; other influences must
also be considered.
If we hold the silica content constant and decrease the silica ratio by increasing the iron and/or alumina, the
amount of liquid phase increases. Also,ifwe hold the iron and alumina content constant but decrease the silica
content, the silica modulus decreases while the amount of liquid phase remains essentially constant. In general,
if a kiln produced a “dusty” clinker because of a low concentration of liquid phase at the burning zone
temperature, a decrease in the silica ratio achieved by adding more iron and/or alumina would be expected to
reduce dusty clinker conditions in the kiln. However, if the silica ratio is further decreased by this method so that
it becomes too low, kiln difficulties could be encountered due to too much liquid phase being formed in the kiln,
potentially getting into the clinker cooler, and building snowmen or large pieces of agglomerated clinker.
Decreasing the silica ratio (i.e., by having more liquid) from a known satisfactory modulus will narrow the
temperature range within which the kiln can be operated without problems.
Liquid phase. The importance of the liquid phase is considerable in regard to having an effec-tive clinkering
zone that will form the final cement compounds (high C3S content with low free lime). Melt development is also
important for C3S development because as the clinker minerals are formed, the exothermic heat of formation is
absorbed in the liquid and can be transferred rapidly to other reacting species.
The percent liquid in kiln feed is calculated from the chemical analysis of kiln feed on a loss free basis. There
are several different equations that can be used. For, example, according to the Lea & Desch Equation:
where:
Lea (1970) cites Lea and Parker paper (1935) as reference. Lea also gives data on the percentage of liquid as a
function of the alumina to iron ratio (A/F) and temperature (Table 3.3.1).
Literature from both Christensen and Johansen (1979) and Miller (1981) have referenced the rela-tionship at
constant silica ratio between percent liquid versus temperature at various A/F values as shown in Figure 3.3.2.
Lime saturation factor (LSF) or C3S content provide indications of how much calcium oxide, or lime, is in the
kiln feed relative to the other components. As C3S content or LSF increases, kiln feed becomes harder to burn;
as they decrease, kiln feed becomes easier to burn.
Figure 3.3.2. Relationship between liquid phase and temperature as a function of A/F ratio.
A 100% LSF value expresses the theoretical limit to the amount of lime (CaO) that can be added to a mix until all
of the calcium would be combined into clinker compounds, with no C2S remaining. If kiln feed contains more
CaO than the maximum that can be combined with the silica, iron, and alumina to form C4AF, C3A, and C3S (i.e.,
the LSF is greater than 100%), some free CaO will remain. If the clinker has a high free lime content when the
kiln appears to be operating normally, rather than increasing the fuel firing rate in an attempt to “burn out” the
free lime, it is better to first determine if the kiln feed chemical composition is the culprit rather than kiln
operations.
“Harder to burn” and “easier to burn.” People in the cement industry use the terms“harder to burn” and “easier
to burn” frequently. However, many people most likely do not fully understand what these terms mean. Rather
than harder to burn, more properly it should be“requires higher temperatures or more time to chemically
combine C2S with free lime to produce C3S,” and easier to burn should be “requires lower temperatures or less
time to chemically combine C2S with free lime to produce C3S.”
A kiln feed that is too “easy to burn” may be an extremely difficult mix for an operator to control in a kiln. A mix
with low silica ratio and a high liquid, especially with a low lime saturation factor, will be easy to overfuel, and
will tend to become sticky in the burning zone if the kiln is overheated slightly. If kiln feed is too easy to burn,
clinker can easily melt and form a liquid, which if it is allowed to flow into the cooler, can cause serious damage
to grates and other cooler components. An easy burning mix will tend to build thick coating, but the coating is
generally unstable and falls out if the temperature profile or feed composition is slightly altered. Sometimes,
making a mix that is a little “harder” to burn will make stable operation of a kiln much easier.
Standard deviation is calculated from chemical analyses of a series of individual (grab) samples. Calculating
standard deviation from a series of samples that have been composited will not provide an accurate measure
of variability. As an example, when told that the maximum acceptable standard deviation for C3S was 3%, a
chief chemist said that their kiln feed met this requirement, since it had a standard deviation of 2.9. On closer
examination, it was determined that kiln feed samples were taken once every two hours, and once per day the
12 samples were mixed together and analyzed. The standard deviation of the analyses of the daily composited
samples was calcu-lated each month. The reported standard deviation substantially understated the highly
variable nature of the kiln feed chemical composition in this case.
The typical method of determining chemical variation in kiln feed is to take one grab sample each hour until a
minimum of 30 samples have been taken, perform a chemical analysis on each sample, then calculate the
standard deviation of the desired parameter (typically, C3S).
The author notes that external factors may affect chemical uniformity in kiln feed. For example, during wet
weather, raw materials may become sticky and blockages can form in raw material feed-ers supplying feed to
the raw mill. Chemical variations in the raw mill product (and the resulting kiln feed) can become extreme
during periods of intermittent flow of raw materials. Other contributing factors inherent to a specific plant site
can cause unacceptably high variations in kiln feed chemical composition. Some cement plant quarries have
highly variable raw material deposits. Selective mining and preblending may be necessary to produce a
chemically uniform kiln feed in these cases. Online analyzers are available that can provide real time analyses
of the entire raw material stream. These analyzers and the associated software for raw material control have
some remarkable successes in reducing chemical variation in kiln feed.
One requirement to achieve chemical uniformity is the ability to control the flow of various raw materials from
storage. Inconsistent and unreliable raw material feed results in severe variations in raw mill product chemistry.
The most sophisticated sampling systems, analyzers, computer controls, and feeders cannot control chemical
variation if it is not possible to reliably withdraw each raw material from storage and proportion it by weight. To
produce kiln feed with an accept-able chemical variation, adequately sized, reliable means of withdrawing raw
materials in a controlled manner from storage and delivering them to the raw mill must be available.
Cement kiln feed contains five major elements, expressed as the oxides, and numerous minor and trace
elements. The five major oxides are SiO2,Al2O3,Fe2O3,CaO, and MgO. The primary minor elements expressed
as oxides are SO3,Na2O, and K2O; however, since most cement raw materials are usually naturally occurring
mineral deposits, many other trace elements exist in the raw materials.
Unfortunately, the five major oxides are not all present in raw materials in the form of oxides. It is unfortunate
because a substantial amount of the total heat input is used to decompose, or calcine, carbonate-bearing raw
materials to prepare them for reaction. Although SiO2,Al2O3, and Fe2O3 are normally present in raw materials
essentially as oxides, CaO and MgO are usually present as carbonates, and their calcination consumes most of
the energy, exclusive of heat losses, in the pyroprocessing system. CaO is formed in the kiln from CaCO3
(limestone or calcite) and MgO is formed in the kiln from MgCO3 (usually from dolomite, CaCO3·MgCO3)
according to the follow-ing simplified chemical reactions:
Note that the temperatures are given in ranges and the energy requirements are approximate figures. These
values depend on numerous factors that have been the subject of substantial research.
Consider some of the basics of the calcination zone from the standpoint of the energy requirement in the
process of making portland cement clinker. The calcination reaction is an endothermic reac-tion (one that
occurs with the absorption of heat), and this heat is not recoverable to the process. Theoretically, the amount of
energy needed for the calcination reactions is the only heat require-ment of the process in an “ideal kiln.” An
ideal kiln has no energy losses in the system. The actual work to be done involves decomposition of calcium
carbonate (and small amounts of magnesium carbonate) in kiln feed into lime or magnesia, with carbon dioxide
being liberated.
How does the above affect kiln operations at a cement plant? Composition of the raw material mix in regard to
percentage of CaCO3 has a substantial effect on the calcining zone. If the raw mix design is higher in CaCO3, it
will require more energy for calcining. For example, a raw mix designed to give clinker with 65% CaO has a
higher energy input requirement for calcination than one designed for 60% CaO-clinker.
Calcination is a time-temperature reaction. If the temperature is held constant, the time required for complete
calcination will be longer when burning a 65%-CaO mix when compared to a 60%-CaO mix at the same
production rate. The time involved could be shortened by increasing the calcining zone temperature, or perhaps
to some extent by grinding the kiln feed finer. The feed rate would also have to be higher to obtain an equal
production rate when higher percentages of CaCO3 are in the mix to compensate for the additional CO2 loss.
Any MgCO3 in the mix would affect the kiln in a similar manner, although the amount of MgO is rather small.
The following example can serve as an illustration:
As can be seen, kiln feed chemical variations can have a noticeable effect on the fuel requirements for
calcining. In a precalciner kiln, changes in the kiln feed carbonate concentration should result in changes in the
fuel rate or in the degree of calcination of kiln feed from the calciner, assuming the temperature and residence
time in the calciner are not changed.In long kilns, both wet and dry, the calcining zone is in the rotary kiln;
consequently, kiln feed carbonate changes are not as readily noticeable and can frequently result in kiln upset
conditions. If the CaO concentration increases, calcining requires more time, and the length of the kiln in which
calcining occurs increases. The thermal profile of the kiln is shifted toward the clinker discharge end. This tends
to compress the burning zone into a progressively shorter length of the kiln and can eventually create a raw
material flush of partially calcined kiln feed through the burning zone and into the clinker cooler.
.
Kiln feed fineness will also affect the amount of dust entrained in the kiln exhaust gases and lost from a kiln. As
the feed becomes finer, more dust will be entrained in the exit gas stream and the actual amount of feed
progressing through the kiln will decrease. Symptoms similar to poor feed rate control will be the result of
varying kiln feed fineness.
If the source of coal is changed or if petroleum coke is introduced into the system, the fineness of the
pulverized solid fuel should be changed accordingly. If the percent volatiles are substantially reduced (e.g., a
reduction of 5% – 10%) from an existing level, the coal mill fineness should be adjusted. An unstable flame and
a long plume may result if the fineness is not increased.
Table 3.3.3. Recommended Coal Fineness
In general, a summary of some of the important factors in producing quality clinker can be outlined as follows:
• The chemical composition of the kiln feed should be designed to obtain sufficient liquid, but not too much,
with components controlled to obtain desired clinker composition.
• Feeding a homogenous mix of the fine oxides is important so that these oxides can be avail-able to each other
in the proper proportions to combine and form the desired clinker compounds.
• The proper degree of fineness required for the combination of the four principal oxides (CaO,
SiO2,Al2O3,Fe2O3) must be maintained. The form of the silica and limiting the maximum size of the silica
entering the kiln are of particular importance.2
• A controlled kiln feed rate (including the moisture content) is important so that the system energy requirement
is constant.
• Temperatures throughout the system must be controlled to develop and maintain proper clinker temperature
in the burning zone for the particular homogenized mix to achieve complete compound formation, avoid
uncombined silica, and limit free lime in the clinker.
• Fuel heating value, fineness, and ash chemistry must be as constant as possible.
• Fuel firing rate must be steady, repeatable, and controllable.
• Clinker cooler operation must be controlled and stable to supply a steady heat input to the system.
Obtaining and controlling the above factors should give a good operating burning zone that pro-duces uniform,
quality clinker with minimum fuel consumption. Each kiln subsystem (including the preheater and clinker
cooler) has an important bearing on the time and temperature required for passage through the sintering zone
to get clinker that will produce high quality cement.
The critical point in the operation of a rotary kiln producing cement clinker is when the material temperature
reaches about 1250°C. Since this point establishes when the liquid phase forms and most of the clinkering
reactions begin, it also establishes the length of the burning zone. If this temperature is reached close to the
discharge of the kiln (nose), the burning zone will be short; if this temperature is reached sooner, the burning
zone will be longer.
When kiln feed is placed into the kiln system, the material temperature remains relatively constant at about
100°C until free water is evaporated. Once water is evaporated, the dry kiln feed tempera-ture rises quickly to
about 600°C. Combined water in clay minerals is vaporized in the temperature range of 200°C – 600°C.
Decarbonation of calcium and magnesium carbonate begins slowly at about 600°C, and is completed at about
1000°C – 1100°C. Most of the decarbonation occurs at about 900°C. As previously noted, carbonate
decomposition requires a substantial amount of energy; consequently, the temperature increase of the
materials as they undergo calcination, from about 600°C to about 900°C, is very slow. Following the calciner
vessel or the calcining zone, a relatively short length of the kiln is used as a heating zone. The heat being added
increases the material temperature quickly, because the mass to be heated has been reduced by about 35%,
and the endothermic reactions are relatively complete.At 1200°C – 1250°C iron and alumina in the kiln feed
begin to melt; the remaining reactions that form the clinker minerals occur at material temperatures ranging
between 1100°C – 1450°C. Formation of most of the clinker minerals is exothermic (release heat) which rapidly
increases material temperature. Belite formation from lime and silica is strongly exothermic, as is the formation
of low-lime aluminates and ferrites. However, the formation of alite from belite and free lime is almost thermally
neutral (Lea, 1970; Gaulitz and others, 1962).
Kiln speed can also be a factor in establishing burning zone length. In general, as a kiln’s rotational speed is
increased, the burning zone will become shorter. Heat transfer from the material surface into the interior of the
material is slow; it has a dominating effect on the total rate of heat transfer and will often decide burning zone
length. This heat transfer occurs when the material turns over in the kiln. When material in the burning zone
tends to slide, it is extremely difficult to heat. For this reason, it is sometimes advantageous to use a higher kiln
rotational speed to tumble the mate-rial and get better heat transfer, despite the reduced clinker residence time
in the burning zone.
Flame shape also has an effect on burning zone length. A short, intense flame will tend to produce a shorter
burning zone. However, a short bushy flame can be a problem; it can cause refractory damage, it can be difficult
to control, and there is little margin for operating errors.
Clinker Formation
Clinker formation is a time/temperature-controlled reaction. That means clinker can be made in two ways. One
is to hold the material at a high temperature for a short period of time, and the other is to hold the material at a
lower temperature for a longer period of time (a minimum temperature is required to initiate the reactions that
form the clinker minerals). Successful kiln operation is achieved when the burning zone length and temperature
are controlled between the two extremes.
Clinker exposed to burning zone temperatures for a longer period of time tends to form large crys-tals of the
clinker minerals. These large crystals make the clinker hard to grind and can adversely affect strength
characteristics of cement produced from the clinker. Clinker that is produced by rapidly heating kiln feed to
reaction temperature and then quickly cooling the clinker results in many small reactive crystals. These smaller
crystals make clinker easier to grind and produce cement that displays excellent strength gains. Other sections
of this book provide a more detailed discussion of clinker mineralogy.
Many of the phase changes and the formation of new compounds are exothermic reactions. Some exothermic
reactions take place very early in the process and continue into the clinkering zone. In the clinkering zone, one
of the main reasons that the amount of liquid phase increases very rapidly is that some of these exothermic
reactions take place and release heat directly into the melt. An important point to help in understanding the
exothermic reaction effect is to realize that in the clinkering zone, this heat from the exothermic reactions is
released right where it is needed. The full heat release is in the material bed as soon as the reaction
temperature has been reached. If the material in the charge is already completely calcined, and no endothermic
reaction heat is required, this heat goes into raising the bed temperature so that more reactions can proceed
faster and more heat will be developed in the bed.
The following can serve as an example of what will occur if the clinker forming reactions stop, and the
exothermic heat of reaction is lost. Assume a precalciner kiln is producing 100 mtph of clinker, with a total
specific fuel consumption of 800 kcal/kg of clinker of which 60% of the fuel is fired into the calciner, and 40% is
fired into the burning zone. The fuel consumption of 800 kcal/kg is an average; the actual heat input per ton
required varies depending on:
If,because of normal variations, the system energy requirements increase slightly and additional energy is not
supplied, system temperatures would slowly begin to cool. For example, if the required coal firing rate was
12,500 kg per hour but the actual firing rate was only 12,400 kg per hour, eventually the burning zone
temperature may reach a point where the clinker-forming reac-tions stop. If these reactions stop, the
exothermic heat of reaction would be lost and this energy would no longer be available to the process. When
the clinker forming reactions stop, the burning zone will lose:
Suddenly, instead of being deficient by 100 kg/h of coal (12,500 kg/h – 12,400 kg/h) the system is deficient by:
This example is applicable to all types of kiln systems; however, since this calciner kiln fires 60% of the fuel in
the calciner and only 40% in the burning zone, the loss of the exothermic heat of reac-tion is particularly
troublesome. The firing rate into the burning zone for the kiln system in our example is:
In order to reestablish the clinker forming reactions, the operator must increase the fuel rate by 100 kcal/kg or
more to replace the exothermic heat of reaction, or the production rate must be drasti-cally reduced while
maintaining the same fuel rate.
When burning zone temperatures reach proper operating levels, the clinker forming reactions begin, and the
exothermic heat is once again available. The kiln burning zone now has 1538 kg/h too much coal. This will
cause the burning zone temperature to increase very quickly.
Kiln drive motorpower. When the burning zone is getting hotter, it becomes longer, and the clinker becomes
stickier. As the kiln rotates, the clinker rides higher on the side of the kiln before it tumbles down. Because the
burning zone is longer, and because the clinker rides higher on the side of the kiln, the kiln drive motor power
(amps or kW) increases as the burning zone temperature increases. However, other things can change the kiln
drive power. If the kiln is thrusting hard, either uphill or downhill, kiln drive power will increase. Mechanical
conditions on the kiln system can also affect the kiln drive power, such as kiln shell ovality and alignment on
kilns with more than two tire and roller stations. Kiln drive power provides a good indication of temperature
changes in the burning zone, but factors unrelated to burning zone temperature can also affect kiln drive power.
In addition, if the burning zone becomes severely overheated, the liquid phase will become less viscous, the
proportion of material in the liquid phase substantially increases, and material may be lost from the refractory
lining. In industry terminology, this is known as the kiln “going liquid.” In this case, the drive amps or kW will
actually decrease. This decrease is a strong warning of a severely overheated condition that, if ignored, will lead
to refractory failure, potential kiln shell damage, and potential clinker cooler damage.
Burning zone temperature. Temperatures in selected parts of the burning zone can be continuously monitored
either with optical pyrometers or with some types of kiln cameras. These cameras also provide a good picture
of the burning zone and frequently provide a view of the material load in the kiln(Figure 3.3.3).
Figure 3.3.3. A typical view of kiln burning zone showing flame and material load.
The location selected to monitor in the kiln will influ-ence the temperature readings. If different locations are
selected, different temperature readings will usually result. The hottest part of the kiln is in the burning zone
where the clinkering reactions are taking place. This is typically about 6 – 12 m from the discharge end of
thekiln. Usually, the last 0 – 6 m of the kiln are a cooling zone for the clinker. If the temperature of the clinker as
it is discharged over the nose of the kiln is monitored, an increase in temperature may indi-cate that the cooling
zone is getting shorter. This is an indication that the burning zone is moving closer to the discharge of the kiln,
or in other words, the kiln system is actually cooling. These cameras provide an excellent view inside a kiln and
a good indication of the temperatures at the points selected. However, care must be exercised in interpreting
these temperature measurements.
Temperatures throughout the kiln system. Temperatures throughout the kiln system can be used as an
indication of what is happening. If the kiln exit temperature and/or preheater tempera-tures are too low, the kiln
feed will not be properly prepared when it gets to the burning zone and will cool the burning zone. If the
temperatures are too high, kiln feed will reach the clinkering reac-tion temperatures sooner in the kiln and result
in an overheated, too long burning zone. However, this assumes that the temperature measurements are
accurate, or at least relative to previous measurements.
As the burning zone temperature increases, the average size of the clinker will usually increase. If the clinker at
the discharge of the kiln begins to look larger than normal, the kiln may be too hot. This change in size will also
affect clinker cooler operations and will be discussed in a following section. However, clinker chemistry can
also influence clinker size.
Kiln exit gas analyses. Peray (1986) said that the excess oxygen (O2) level can be used as an advanced
indication of changes in the burning zone temperature providing the kiln induced draft (ID) fan and fuel rate
have not been changed. This author has observed that when a kiln has been operating in a stable condition for
several hours with no changes or a few small changes, if the temperature in the burning zone begins to cool, the
excess oxygen (O2) level at the kiln exit may gradually drop or the CO emissions may increase. This can also
provide an indication that the kiln is cooling. However, the excess O2 or CO levels in the kiln exit gases can be
influenced by several other things. If the quantity of fuel or fuel chemistry changes, the O2 and CO levels will be
affected. For example, in a direct fired coal mill system if the moisture content of the coal drops, the kiln will get
more tons of dry coal at the same setting on the raw coal feeder. Changes in the percentages of coal versus
coke, for a kiln firing both fuels simultaneously, will also affect the CO and O2 level.
NOx concentration is a very good indicator of burning zone temperature if the gas sample is taken from the
exhaust gases of the rotary kiln. Most NOx formed in the kiln is “thermal” NOx,which is formed at very high
temperatures, such as at the flame temperature in the burning zone. Small changes in the flame temperature
will produce noticeable changes in kiln exit gas NOx concentra-tion. NOx emissions are directly related to
burning zone temperature (the relationship is not linear); however, other factors can influence NOx emissions.
NOx levels also tend to be directly related to excess O2 and inversely related to CO concentrations in kiln
exhaust gases. Conse-quently, although NOx is a very good indicator of burning zone temperature changes,
other factors can also influence NOx concentrations in kiln exit gases.
Clinker free lime. Clinker free lime can be used as an indicator of conditions in the kiln. If the kiln feed chemical
composition is constant, and the free lime begins to increase, the kiln may be cooling; however, free lime can be
high if the kiln feed chemical composition is not correct. A drawback with using the free lime as an indicator of
burning zone conditions is the time lag between the condition and the diagnosis. A clinker sample from the
cooler discharge will be at least 45 minutes old by the time the analysis is started in the laboratory and
laboratory analysis can take 30 – 90 minutes to complete.
Clinker alkali content. Clinker alkali concentration can also be an indicator of burning zone temperature. As the
temperature in the burning zone increases, the potassium concentration usually decreases. Although the
sodium concentration is also affected, the change in sodium concentration is not nearly as pronounced as the
change in potassium concentrations. As with control based on free lime, the clinker sample from the cooler
discharge will be taken and analysis begun at least 45 minutes after the clinker has passed the hottest part of
the burning zone. Accordingly, conditions in the kiln may have changed substantially by the time information on
alkalis or free lime is available.
Clinker cooler operation. Typically, clinker cooler grate speed is controlled by the pressure in either the first or
second undergrate compartment, or both. Several things affect the undergrate pressure, including:
If the airflow into an undergrate compartment changes and everything else remains constant, the undergrate
pressure will change. As airflow increases, pressure increases. Typically, airflow of undergrate fans is
automatically controlled, and unless the airflow set point for an undergrate fan is changed, the effect on
pressure because of differences in airflow is minimized.
When kiln speed is changed, the quantity of clinker entering the clinker cooler changes propor-tionately. When
kiln speed is increased, if the clinker cooler has been operating in a stable condi-tion, the undergrate air
supplied to the cooler should be increased by a proportionate amount. If kiln feed rate is proportionate to kiln
speed, additional fuel and ID fan will be added when the kiln speed is increased; however, more undergrate air
will be needed than used by the process, with the result that the cooler vent fan damper will open or the cooler
vent fan speed will increase.
When the kiln is in an upset condition and material flushes into the cooler, the cooler vent temper-ature can
increase dramatically. As excess material begins to flow into the cooler, the grate speed increases which
reduces the residence time in the cooler and results in hotter clinker being discharged. Since more material is
entering the cooler, the amount of heat that must be removed by the cooler increases. Some of this heat is
transferred to the secondary and tertiary air, which raises their temperature; some of the heat is transferred to
the vent air, which raises its tempera-ture; and some of the excess heat leaves the cooler with inadequately
cooled clinker. When the temperature of the secondary air, tertiary air, and vent air is increased, the volume
increases proportionately. If additional undergrate air is supplied to help cool the clinker, the vent volume is
again increased.
During an upset condition, the cooler can become quickly overheated. Since the vent fan will most likely be
operating near maximum airflow, it is generally not possible to increase the airflow to the undergrate fans
enough to cool the large excess of material. Consequently, the cooler will be discharging hot clinker unless
other measures are taken.In a situation in which more material is flowing into the clinker cooler than can be
properly cooled, the proper response is to slow down the kiln. Simply stated, if the cooler is being fed more
material than it can handle, put less material into the cooler.
If the clinker temperature increases and everything else remains constant, the undergrate pressure will
increase. When cool air from the undergrate fans enters the bed of clinker, the air temperature increases rapidly,
which makes the air expand rapidly. This rapid expansion restricts the flow of additional air into the bed of
clinker; that is, the pressure increases.
If the average size of the clinker from the kiln becomes smaller and everything else remains constant, the
undergrate pressure will increase. For example, it would take much more pressure to blow air through a one-half
meter layer of sand than through a one-half meter layer of coarse aggregate.
As we have seen previously, several things can affect clinker cooler undergrate pressure. Since the cooler grate
speed is usually controlled automatically to maintain a given pressure in an undergrate compartment,
parameters that affect undergrate pressure may actually affect grate speed. As the undergrate pressure
increases, the grate speed will increase to bring the pressure back to the set point. Table 3.3.4 summarizes
selected conditions that affect the cooler undergrate pressure, and hence the grate speed:
When a kiln has been operating in a stable condition for several hours (two hours or more) and begins to cool
gradually but is still producing clinker minerals, the following things happen that affect the clinker cooler:
• The temperature of the clinker entering the clinker cooler will increase slightly.
• The average size of the clinker will get smaller.
Both of these factors result in an increase in clinker cooler undergrate pressure, which will result in the grate
speed increasing. Accordingly, if the clinker cooler grate speed gradually increases over a one-half hour to two-
hour period, the kiln may be cooling. If the grates are slowing, the kiln may be getting hotter.
Summary of kiln indicators. The above discussion has reviewed some operating parameters that can provide
indications of what the kiln has done and what it is currently doing. However, each of these indicators can be
influenced by conditions not related to kiln operation. Therefore, an operator must not rely on a single indicator
to determine kiln conditions. A good operator will examine all of the indicators at hand and then make a
decision based on all of the information available.
Table 3.3.5 summarizes parameters that an operator can use to help determine kiln operating conditions. This
table is a list of the indicators discussed and what may happen when the kiln is cooling.
Typically, a kiln operates near optimum conditions. If a kiln has been operating at or near maxi-mum production
levels for several hours, the fuel rate and kiln feed rate are probably close to the proper balance. Kiln operations
must be as stable as possible to achieve sustained operations and produce the maximum amount of good
quality clinker at the lowest total cost.
The following suggested operating practices are for periods when a kiln is in a stable operating condition, and
the operator is trying to optimize the process to insure continued stable operation.
Kilns are large thermal masses, and typical residence times are 30 minutes for preheater or precal-ciner kilns to
3 hours or more for long wet or long dry kilns. Because of the large thermal mass, it is not possible to quickly
alter kiln system temperatures. Because of the residence time, the effect of some changes (for example fuel
changes) may require some time before the full effect of the change becomes evident.
Successfully operating a kiln requires patience and planning. An operator must review what the kiln has been
doing for the last 4 – 8 hours, try to determine where it is going to be in 1 – 2 hours, then decide if a change in
operating conditions is required to alter this. If the operator watches all of the indicators previously discussed
and decides that a kiln is beginning to cool or overheat, what response, if any, will keep the kiln stable and at
optimum production levels?
the kiln is probably becoming hotter, and a change may be required to bring the temperatures back to proper
operating levels. Cooling a kiln (particularly a long kiln) that is too hot is very difficult to do without cooling it too
much. If the kiln is operating at less than the maximum production rate, it is usually better to increase
production to slowly cool the kiln rather than reduce the fuel rate.If the oxygen at the kiln exit is too low, the fuel
rate is too high, or the kiln is operating at maximum speed, then the fuel rate should be reduced slightly. Another
reduction in fuel should not be undertaken for at least one full residence time for a kiln. For a calciner kiln this
could be 30 – 45 minutes, or for a long wet process kiln it could be 3 – 4 hours. The maximum fuel reduction
should be about 1% of the normal fuel rate. It is usually not a good idea to increase the kiln speed or feed and at
the same time reduce the fuel feed rate. This correction should only be implemented if the kiln system is
severely overheated.
• kiln drive power has been dropping for the last 30 – 90 minutes
• cooler grates have been speeding up for the last 30 – 90 minutes
• kiln exit oxygen concentration is slowly dropping
• average clinker size is getting finer
• NO concentration has been slowly dropping,
the kiln is probably starting to cool, and a small change should be made early to prevent the kiln from getting
too cold. If the change is delayed, it may be very difficult to counteract the cooling trend. When indications are
that a kiln system is beginning to cool, reducing kiln speed and/or production by a small amount will usually
disrupt the kiln less than increasing fuel by a large amount. For example, if a kiln is cooling, the production rate
is reduced slightly, and temperatures begin to increase; production can be increased as the kiln heats up.
However, the fuel rate when the kiln was at the previous production level was apparently not enough because
the kiln was cooling.
Therefore when the kiln production returns to near the starting level, some fuel should be added, with a
corresponding increase in ID fan damper position (or fan speed), before increasing produc-tion to the point at
which the kiln was previously operating.
If changes are made early in response to indications that the kiln is cooling, many times a slight decrease in
production rate (kiln speed) can keep a kiln stable. If a kiln is cooling gradually, reduc-ing production by only 2%
– 4% may stabilize kiln system temperatures. Once the kiln indicates that it is heating up again, a small fuel
increase can be made and production increased back to maximum.
Stable Kiln Operation
When a kiln has been operating in a stable condition for several hours or days, the kiln speed, kiln feed rate, and
fuel firing rate are very close to the optimum. When the kiln is close to its optimum, it is usually not wise to
allow temperatures in the kiln to increase or decrease for an extended period before a correction is made. If the
operator is forced into making a large change, it will be many hours before the kiln system stabilizes again.
Additionally, when an operator first takes over a shift, if the kiln has been stable with no changes or with only
very small changes, it is not wise to make major changes to the system just because the kiln operating values
are not what the individ-ual operator personally likes.
Numerous factors have been discussed that an operator must consider and try to control when operating the
kiln. The operator has three main parameters that can be adjusted to control the burning process:
False air or air leakage entering through openings around the kiln firing hood and feed end seal wastes energy,
because cool ambient air replaces preheated combustion air. A typical heat loss attributable to ambient air
leakage around the hood would be about 1 – 2 billion kcal per year for an opening 0.1 m2 in area. If fuel costs
$8 per million kcal, this will cost about $10,000 – $15,000 per year; however, this does not include the cost of
lost production.
Convection. Convection is heat transfer from one material to another through fluid motion. For example, heat is
transferred from the hot kiln gases to incoming feed in a preheater vessel. A formula for heat transfer by
convection (Perry and others, 1984) is:
Q = h • A (T1 – T2)
Q = rate of heat transfer in J/s (or, Btu/hr).
h = coefficient of heat transfer in J/(m2 • s • °K) (or, Btu/hr/sq ft/°R) A = area available for heat transfer in m2
(or, sq ft)
T1 – T2 = temperature difference in °K (or, °R)
Conduction. Conduction is heat transfer within a given material or heat transfer from one material to another in
physical contact by transfer of vibrational energy from one molecule to another. For example, heat is transferred
from hot kiln chain to cooler kiln feed by conduction. A formula for heat transfer by conduction from Fourier’s
law (Perry and others, 1984) is:
Q = k • A (dt/dx)
where,
Radiation. Radiation is the transfer of heat from one material to another when the two materials are not in
contact. For example, when you walk by a hot kiln shell you feel the heat without actu-ally coming into contact
with the kiln shell. Heat transfer by radiation is an important factor within the kiln. The flame, refractory, and
coating radiate heat to the feed in the kiln. A formula for heat transfer by radiation is (Perry and others, 1984):
Q = σεA (TF4-TP4)
where
It is generally understood that radiation, or radiant heat transfer, is the primary mechanism that transfers heat in
the burning zone; about 95% of the heat transfer in the burning zone is through radiation.
The “correct” or proper amount of air for combustion is generally determined by an oxygen analyzer or CO
analyzer at the exit of the kiln or preheater. Exit oxygen should be controlled so that sufficient excess oxygen is
available to ensure all of the fuel is completely burned. Hansen (1986) described the use of CO analysis at the a
per million (ppm) level to control the supply of combustion air to a kiln system. He maintained that CO is a more
reliable indicator of combus-tion conditions than O2 because:
• the results from oxygen analyzers may be influenced by ambient air leakage,
• localized reducing conditions may exist because of poor air/fuel mixing, and
• poor combustion conditions may exist for other reasons.
In these situations, the process gases may have what appears to be adequate oxygen concentration, yet poor
combustion conditions exist. Mullinger and Jenkins (1996) said that air/fuel mixing is the slowest of the
combustion reaction steps in a rotary kiln, and that “if it’s mixed, it’s burnt.” Consequently, the amount of oxygen
required for proper combustion will be a function not only of the stoichiometry but also of the efficiency of
mixing.
Small amounts of infiltration can strongly affect the O2 concentration at an analyzer. Less than optimum
combustion conditions can exist simultaneously with what is generally thought to be good O2 concentrations
(1.0% – 2.5%) in the kiln exhaust gases. CO is an excellent indicator of combustion conditions; use of a CO
analyzer provides a more direct measurement of combustion conditions. Hansen (1986) said that a CO analyzer
will provide a reliable indication of combustion conditions despite ambient air infiltration; therefore, the gas
sample for the CO or combustibles analyzer can be taken from the clean side of the kiln dust collector and still
provide useful infor-mation on combustion conditions in the kiln. There is, however, an important limitation on
the use of CO measurements to determine combustion efficiency. If the raw materials contain organic material
or unoxidized carbon, CO may be produced from the raw materials and can result in CO emissions that are
unrelated to combustion conditions. If the kiln system is a preheater or preheater/precalciner system, the CO
analyzer should be located at the kiln inlet or in a preheater gas bypass (if the system has a bypass) for
monitoring kiln combustion conditions.
In a rotary kiln producing cement clinker, the objective is to do useful work with the heat gener-ated by the
flame; in other words, to make clinker. The flame has to transfer heat into the bed of material in the burning
zone. Heat may be transferred into the bed of clinker by conduction, convection, and radiation. Radiation, or
radiant heat transfer, is the primary mechanism that transfers heat in the burning zone; about 95 percent of the
heat transfer in the burning zone is through radiation. Simply stated, the amount of heat transferred is related to
the rate of heat transfer and the time available. The time available to transfer heat in the burning zone is short
because the gas velocity is high. The rate of heat transfer by radiation is proportional to the fourth power of the
temperature of the flame. Therefore, to improve the rate of heat transfer, the flame temperature should be as
high as possible, but not so high that it would damage the coating or refractory. Other factors such as the
temperature of the material in the kiln and the emissivity of the flame also affect the rate of heat transfer.
Several parameters influence flame temperature. The speed of mixing fuel and combustion air affects it. The
faster fuel and air can be mixed, the faster the fuel burns and liberates heat, and the higher the flame
temperature. The temperature of the combustion air will influence flame temper-ature. Higher secondary air
temperatures will result in higher flame temperatures, but ambient air leaks and relatively cold primary air will
reduce combustion air temperature. Ambient air leaks around the hood should be sealed to improve fuel
efficiency and to increase flame temperature, which improves the heat transfer rate in the burning zone. The
minimum amount of primary air that provides good fuel/air mixing should be used. Theoretically, the highest
flame temperature occurs at near 0% excess air. The actual peak is just slightly on the “lean” side of
stoichiometric combustion. The temperature of a flame decreases with too much or too little combustion air;
however, flame temperature decreases more rapidly with too little air. Flame temperature is also nfluenced by
the temperature of the surroundings; higher coating and material temperatures radi-ate heat back into the
flame, which raises the flame temperature.
Situations can occur in which the flame temperature is lower than normal. For example, if a firing hood
inspection door is open and allows substantial amounts of ambient air inleakage, the flame temperature will be
reduced. When the flame temperature drops, the heat transfer rate is lower, which results in less heat being
transferred to the material in the burning zone. Since less heat is transferred to the material, this heat increases
the exit gas temperature. Another potential reason for lower flame temperature can be operating with
insufficient oxygen for complete combustion, or “substoichiometric” combustion. When substoichiometric
combustion conditions exist, full heating value of the fuel is not realized, and the flame cools and becomes
much longer. It is worth noting that combustion of carbon to carbon monoxide generates less than half the
energy that full combustion to CO2 releases. At times, kilns can be in an upset condition, with the burning zone
too cool and the feed end gas temperature too high. Many times this is the result of conditions that have cooled
the flame and consequently reduced the heat transfer rate in the burning zone.
The direct system is the simplest of the various firing systems and, as such, tends to be the most reliable and
safest system to operate. A typical direct firing system incorporates the following pieces of equipment:
• A hot air take-off from the clinker cooler with a dedusting cyclone to remove entrained clinker dust.
• Duct work to the hot air inlet of the mill. The hot air duct is provided with appropriate dampers and ambient air
tempering to control temperatures at the mill inlet and outlet.
• A raw fuel bunker or silo with a shutoff gate, and a raw fuel feeder, typically a belt scale.
• A mill to simultaneously grind, classify, and dry the solid fuel. The mill is typically designed to resist an internal
pressure of 3.5 bar to contain explosions.
• An induced draft system fan that pulls hot air from the clinker cooler through the mill and blows the pulverized
fuel/air mixture into the kiln.
• A burner pipe to provide adequate tip velocity to prevent propagation of the flame into the burner pipe, and to
produce turbulence at the burner tip for enhanced combustion and flame stability.
A direct firing system tends to be inherently safer because there are fewer pieces of equipment to malfunction,
fewer vessels, and less duct work. In addition, pulverized fuel is not stored, but is conveyed to the kiln and
burned immediately after being pulverized. Although the direct firing system tends to be safer, more reliable,
and less expensive, it typically uses more cool primary air and therefore is less fuel efficient. In addition, the
evaporated moisture is blown into the kiln, and reduces flame temperature.
An indirect system has substantially more equipment than a direct system and as such tends to be less reliable
to operate; however, depending on the quantity of pulverized fuel stored, the mill may be taken out of service for
short periods (several minutes) without affecting kiln operations. A typical indirect system incorporates the
following pieces of process equipment:
• A hot air take-off, typically from the clinker cooler, with a dedusting cyclone to remove entrained clinker dust
• Duct work to the hot air inlet of the mill
• The mill to simultaneously grind and dry the solid fuel
• A pulverized fuel cyclone (optional) with rotary airlock and explosion vents
• A fabric filter with rotary airlocks, quick acting isolation gates, and explosion vents
• A system fan to induce the draft that pulls hot gases through the mill, cyclone, and fabric filter for drying the
raw solid fuel
• Screw conveyors to transport pulverized fuel from the fabric filter and cyclone to the pulver-ized fuel bin(s)
• Pulverized fuel bin(s)
• Feeder(s) from the pulverized fuel bin(s) to the transport system
• High pressure blower(s) to provide air to convey fuel to the burner pipe(s)
• High pressure blower(s) to provide primary air to the burner pipe(s) for flame shaping
• Carbon monoxide sensors and temperature sensors throughout the system to warn of impending fire or
explosion
• A fire suppression system using inert gas
• An automatic system to activate the fire suppression system based on CO or temperature signals
• Burner pipe or pipes
The indirect firing system offers three distinct advantages:- one large mill may be used to supply fuel to multiple
firing points, modern multichannel burner pipes may be used for flame shaping and NOx reduction, and an
indirect system tends to be more fuel efficient, which may also reduce NOx emissions. However, an indirect
firing system is more complicated to operate, more expensive to purchase and install, tends to be less reliable,
and is more prone to serious fires and explosions.
Because the indirect firing system is more complicated and uses more equipment, it is inherently more
expensive to design, purchase, and install. Generally, with a properly designed direct firing system, fuel savings
alone will not provide sufficient cost savings to financially justify a conversion from direct to indirect. An
exception is when one large mill is used to supply fuel to multiple firing points rather than using individual mills
for each point. Indirect systems also tend to be more difficult and hazardous to operate because there are more
pieces of equipment with more chances for mechanical and operational malfunctions to occur, and they have
vessels containing large volumes of explosive mixtures of finely pulverized fuel.When a pulverized fuel system
is designed, the designer must include preventive measures in the system design to minimize the possibility of
malfunctions. The designer must also design the system to minimize potential hazards when mechanical or
operational problems do occur.
An indirect system is generally designed with carbon monoxide (CO) monitors in the cyclone, fabric filters, raw
solid fuel bunker, and pulverized fuel bins. Temperature sensors are also located at various points throughout
the system. A fire suppression system and inerting system (usually an inert gas such as CO2 or N2) is installed
to suppress incipient fires, and to provide an inert atmos-phere for times when the system is shut down with
pulverized fuel remaining in the system. The monitoring and inerting systems are usually under computer
control with provisions that the inerting system can be manually activated.
Since no monitoring or inerting system can ensure that a fire or explosion never occurs, an indi-rect system is
typically designed to withstand an internal pressure of 3.5 bar (50 psi) from the mill inlet through the fabric filter
outlet to contain an explosion. Explosion venting is frequently included to direct the release of excessive
pressures safely.
Because of the robust design of the system and the additional safety measures required, an indirect firing
system is substantially more expensive to design, purchase, and install than a comparably sized direct firing
system.
SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS
Pulverized Solid Fuel System Safety Considerations
An appreciation of the properties of solid fuel and a comprehensive understanding of the princi-ples of mill
operation can make solid fuel grinding safer. A mill, like any other piece of equipment, depends on two factors
for success: how well it is maintained and how well it is operated.
General Guidelines
No manual or book will be able to provide instructions for every situation that may occur. Below are some
suggestions for operating a solid fuel mill system:
1. Maintenance work or inspections that require opening equipment should be performed only when given
specific instructions and under the direct supervision of authorized personnel.
2. Use extreme caution when opening inspection doors. Opening an inspection door on a solid fuel grinding
system can provide oxygen to smoldering, powdered solid fuel and result in fires or explosions.
3. Do not poke or disturb any solid fuel accumulations if there is any evidence of heat, smoke, or glowing
embers. Allow the system to cool further, and then check again as necessary. When you are convinced
everything is OK, remove any accumulations in small amounts.
4. Before working on or around solid fuel firing systems, the system must be inerted or washed down with water
to be sure powdered solid fuel cannot ignite.
5. Cutting or welding around or on a solid fuel firing system can result in fires and explosions.
6. The mill hot air inlet temperature should not exceed 315°C on systems using ambient air.
7. The mill outlet temperature should not exceed 95°C on direct fired systems; the maximum outlet temperature
on indirect systems is generally lower than that for direct fired systems using the same solid fuel.
8. If a fire occurs in the mill:
• Do not shut the mill down.
• Do not attempt to open any mill inspection doors until all evidence of the fire has disap-peared.
• Never use compressed air in an attempt to blow out the fire. Disturbing burning or smol-dering solid fuel in any
way is very hazardous.
• Iffires continue to ignite in the mill, sometimes feeding 5 – 10 kg (or substantially more at times) of limestone
or sand into the mill will dislodge solid fuel buildups that may be the origin of fires.
• A water spray may be used to flood the mill if the procedures above do not stop the fire (but see note on
Western coals below).
• When the mill outlet temperature has fallen to ambient or near ambient, shut down the mill.
• After 2 – 4 hours, inspect the mill system according to established procedures.
Maintenance Practices
Maintenance on pulverized solid fuel mill systems should be performed only by well-trained mechanical or
electrical repair personnel under the direct supervision of an individual who fully understands the hazards
associated with working on a pulverized solid fuel mill system. The system should be allowed to cool to
ambient temperatures and inerted before the mill system is opened. Some of the maintenance features of a mill
system that affect safety are:
1. Be sure the belt magnet on the raw fuel belt is always operating properly. If metal gets into a mill it can cause
fires or explosions.
2. Ensure temperature sensors (thermocouples) are accurately calibrated. If thermocouples are not calibrated
correctly, high temperatures could cause fires or explosions.
3. Preventive maintenance should make sure that wear parts are replaced when they are worn. Hard facing on
fan blades and fan housing liners must be replaced when worn. Replace worn plows to make sure rejects are
removed from the lower housing of roller mills.
4. Overheated bearings in a mill system can cause a fire or explosion.
5. If hot air is supplied from the cooler, inspect the cyclone dust trap and airlock for proper operation to avoid
hot embers getting into the mill.
The above are some features that affect safety; however, others that may be specific to a particular system will
also have to be observed.
Employee Training
Any solid fuel system requires extensive employee training. Operators must be trained to properly respond to
normal and emergency conditions. When a series of dangerous events occur, the proper response to these
conditions may prevent a fire or explosion, or reduce the severity of a fire or explosion. An improper response to
conditions may turn a minor process upset into an explosion. A continuing, formal operators’ training program
is essential.
Tramp Metal
Iron or other spark-producing debris can cause sparks in a bowl or roller mill capable of initiating a solid fuel
dust explosion. Every effort must be made to be sure that scrap metal is not allowed to enter a mill. Pieces of
metal in a mill can also be heated to temperatures high enough to start a fire or explosion by being in the mill as
it operates. Belt magnets and metal detectors on solid fuel belts must always be operating properly. Scrap
metal in a mill is particularly dangerous during mill shutdown or startup.
If a mill is shut down and a small amount of solid fuel remains in the mill, it can slowly increase in temperature
because of moisture condensing, oxidation of the solid fuel, or reaction of sulfur contained in the solid fuel with
moisture. The problem noted above with Western coals can also occur. If the pulverized solid fuel undergoes
spontaneous heating and the mill is restarted with hot embers present, an explosion or fire is possible. This
does not happen often; however, the more frequently a mill is shut down and then restarted, the more likely it
becomes.
System Temperatures
On non-inert, direct-fired coal mill systems, mill hot air inlet temperatures should not exceed 315°C, and outlet
temperatures should not exceed 90°C.Indirect firing systems should be operated at lower mill outlet
temperatures. As the volatile concentration in the fuel increases, the outlet temperature may need to be lower to
prevent fires or explosions, particularly for Western or subbituminous coals. If the flow of raw solid fuel to the
mill is interrupted for any reason (for example: plugging, failure of the solid fuel feeder, or other reasons) the
outlet temperature of the mill can climb to dangerous levels quickly.
System Velocities
Velocities in ducts or conveying lines must be at least 25 meters per second (m/s) to avoid material dropping
out in the duct work. If dropout occurs, the risk of fire is increased, and the pressure drop in the system
increases, with its attendant effects. Burner pipes must be designed to maintain a minimum tip (discharge)
velocity of 45 m/s. Velocities less than 45 m/s substantially increase the risk of the solid fuel flame
propagating backwards into the burner pipe, and potentially through the conveying lines to the mill, causing
substantial damage to the equipment.
Spontaneous Combustion
Avoiding spontaneous combustion of solid fuel requires special attention. Two reactions are important for
causing heating that can lead to spontaneous combustion. These reactions are oxidation at the surface of a
solid fuel particle, which is most active when the solid fuel has been freshly pulverized, and condensation of
water onto the solid fuel. When water condenses, it releases heat which can be a significant factor in the initial
increase in temperature of a solid fuel dust mass. However, oxidation is how solid fuel ultimately reaches its
ignition temperature.
The ease with which coal will oxidize is extremely variable. Coals that are high in bed moisture, oxygen content,
sulfur content, and volatile content are usually easier to oxidize (Leonard, 1979). However, the more fresh
surface area available for oxidation, the more rapidly solid fuel will oxidize. The total exposed surface area is
important. With more fresh surface exposed, oxygen has a greater chance of uniting with solid fuel with the
result that the total heat liberated in a given time for a given weight of solid fuel will be substantially greater.
According to Leonard (1979), coal oxidizes slowly at temperatures below 50°C, but oxidation increases at an
increasing rate (aided by higher temperatures) until the temperature of the coal is about 100°C – 135°C. At
about 135°C, carbon monoxide and water are given off. Carbon monoxide liberation increases rapidly until a
temperature of about 230°C is reached, when a fire may occur. A layer of high-volatile coal dust will ignite at
about 175°C. The critical temperature for bitumi-nous coal is about 50°C – 65°C. In this range, spontaneous
heating will increase rapidly unless preventive measures are taken.
The rate of oxidation increases rapidly as the temperature increases. For some coals, a temperature increase of
10°C can double the rate of oxidation. (It is a general rule of thumb that chemical reac-tions double in rate for
every 10°C increase in temperature). If heating from oxidation occurs in a mass of coal dust, the ignition
temperature of coal can be reached quickly, if enough oxygen is present. The temperature rise can be rapid
because oxidation releases heat, and heat causes the rate of oxidation to increase, which releases still more
heat.
When a mill system suffers an unplanned shutdown, solid fuel dust accumulations will occur in the system and
will begin to heat. Because the moisture content in the air in the mill system is high (because of solid fuel
drying), condensation may occur on solid fuel dust accumulations, which can result in hot spots. The reaction
of water vapor with overly dried Western coals can also increase temperature. These hot spots can rapidly heat
and cause a fire or, when the system is restarted and glowing embers are entrained in the air stream, an
explosion can occur. Generally, coal with higher inherent moisture content is also more prone to spontaneous
combustion (Leonard, 1979).
When a buildup of coal dust is allowed to occur, coal will begin to heat for reasons just explained. Therefore, it
is important that all coal dust is immediately cleaned and dust is not allowed to buildup in piles.
1. The concentration of solid fuel dust in the gas mixture is within the explosion limits.
2. The oxygen content in the gas mixture is sufficient for an explosion.
3. There is sufficient thermal energy to initiate an explosion.
Theoretically, the absence of any one of these three factors would be enough to prevent a solid fuel dust
explosion. However, it is preferable to eliminate two or, possibly, all three factors.
The lower explosive limit for coal is about 50 g/m3 to 150 g/m3 and the upper explosive limit for coal dust is
about 1500 g/m3.These concentrations vary depending on the fineness of the coal, combustible gases in the
coal dust/air mixture, and other factors. The area below the lower explo-sive limit is very narrow. Operations
below the lower explosive limit should not be considered safe because even though the average concentration
may be less than the lower explosive limit, local-ized concentrations of coal in the system may exceed the limit.
Oxygen concentrations above 12%
– 14% will support an explosion. Thermal energy required for initiating an explosion could origi-nate from
several sources:
• Spontaneous combustion or self-heating of the solid fuel
• Overheating of the solid fuel by hot gases used for drying that are too hot
• Overheated machine parts, such as hot bearings
• Metal entering the mill with the coal can cause sparks or become hot enough to start a fire or explosion
Limited testing has been done on ignition of explosive mixtures of gases and dusts emitted from cement kilns
(Inculet and others, 1993). The researchers found that during normal operating conditions on two kilns tested,
exhaust gas composition was well within the safe range. However, under upset conditions, the gas composition
could be explosive and, in most cases, the amount of dust present in the APCD was not sufficient to prevent
ignition of the gas (Inculet and others, 1993). Carbon monoxide (CO) is not the only explosive gas that may be
generated in a kiln exhaust. Incomplete combustion can generate other flammable species such as hydrogen
(H2) and methane (CH4) (Hawks and Chadbourne, 1987).
A substantial body of information exists on fires and explosions related to coal dust, mixtures of coal dust and
methane, and the use of limestone dust to suppress coal dust explosions. Data exist on the effects of varying
levels of oxygen or inert gases on fires and explosions of combustible materials. Data also exist on the effects
on explosion sensitivity of varying temperatures; however, cement kiln exhaust gases contain all of these
elements in widely varying degrees at different times. Little information exists on the potential for fires or
explosions while considering the major vari-ables present in a cement kiln exhaust gas APCD. These variables
include
• Elevated temperatures
• Presence of combustible gases such as CO, CH4,H2,etc.
• Presence of combustible dusts
• Varying levels of oxygen
• Presence of usually inert gases such as N2,CO2, and water vapor.
• Dust loading in the gas stream
• The presence or absence of spark initiation
The usual descriptions of lean (lower) limits of flammability are stated at atmospheric pressure and room
temperature. It should be recognized that those limits are merely two points on the flammability limit surface. A
given mixture that is nonflammable at atmospheric pressure can become flammable at elevated pressures.
Likewise, a mixture that is nonflammable at room temperature may become flammable at an elevated
temperature (Hertzberg and others, 1985).
Elevated temperatures increase the flammability and the autoignitability of combustible mixtures. With
increasing temperature, the lean limit concentration decreases as does the concentration at which autoignition
occurs (Conti and Hertzberg, 1987). The thermal autoignition probability may still be trivial when the
temperature is increased from 25°C to 200°C, but that increase in operatingtemperature will have a profound
effect on the probability of spark initiation of an explosion(Conti and Hertzberg, 1987).
According to Conti and Hertzberg (1987), major uncertainties persist in the experimental data. Among these are
the effects of particle size of the combustible dusts and the volume of the test furnace in the laboratory
experiments used to determine these data. Some particle size influences have been investigated, but the
effects of furnace volume have not been quantified. As the furnace volume increases, the concentration and
temperatures required for ignition decrease. Caution must be exercised in applying laboratory data to industrial-
size furnaces (Conti and Hertzberg, 1987).
The effect of initial temperature on ignitability is an important consideration in assessing explo-sion hazards.
The ignitability behavior of a dust is more sensitive to an increase in ambient temperature than is its lean limit.
For example, for a coal dust concentration of 400 g/m3,an increase in the temperature from 75°C to 200°C
results in an order of magnitude reduction in the spark energy required to initiate an explosion. There is a strong
synergism between the thermal energy content and the spark initiation energy required, even at temperatures
that are considerably below the autoignition temperature of the mixture. This synergism makes it very difficult
to esti-mate the ignition probability when various types of ignition sources may be simultaneously pres-ent in a
given system (Hertzberg and Cashdollar, 1987).
The modified Burgess-Wheeler (B-W) law is an empirical formula that may be used to estimate the lean
flammability limits at elevated temperatures from the lean flammability limit at room temperature (Hertzberg
and Cashdollar, 1987):
The B-W equation has been found to be reasonably valid for a variety of coals, agricultural dusts, and chemical
dusts (Hertzberg and Cashdollar, 1987).
Coal dust data show an order of magnitude reduction in the ignition energy required to ignite dust clouds (with
a concentration of 400 g/m3) for a 100°C increase in temperature (Hertzberg and others, 1985). Some other
limited experimental data on the effects of initial temperature on the lower explosive limit for coal are presented
in Table 3.3.6 as follows:
The ignition sensitivity of hybrid mixtures can be substantially different than the individual gases or dusts
involved. The lower explosive limit (LEL) for CO is listed in the literature as 12.5% in air; however when hydrogen
is present, the explosive level for CO is reduced (Hawks and Chadbourne, 1987).
The minimum ignition energy (MIE) for hybrid mixtures is higher than that for flammable gases but significantly
lower than for combustible dusts. Hybrid mixtures pose an insidious hazard to industry. Design parameters for
the lower flammability limit (LFL), minimum explosible concen-tration (MEC), and MIE may not provide
adequate protection against the development of explo-sive mixtures in industrial situations (Napier and
Roopchant, 1987).
The addition of a fuel gas to a dust/air mixture will increase the explosion hazard. The ignition energy required
for gaseous fuel is generally much lower than for dusts, and a small addition of a combustible gas may have a
much larger effect on the ignitability of the mixture than would be expected from a simple linear relationship.
The addition of a small amount of combustible gas will highly sensitize a hybrid mixture. The thermal ignitability
characteristics of hybrid mixtures of gases and dusts are largely unexplored (Hertzberg and Cashdollar, 1987).
Researchers determined that when the O2 content of a test gas mixture was increased from 8% to 9%, the
quantity of cement dust required to suppress an explosion rose approximately 500% forsimilar concentrations
of CO (Inculet and others, 1993). Explosive gas mixtures, according to Inculet and others (1993), are shown in
Table 3.3.7. It must be noted that the data given in the Table 3.3.7 are for mixtures of clean gases without kiln
dust.
Table 3.3.7. Explosive Gas Mixtures Data for Clean Gases Without Kiln Dust (Inculet and Others, 1993)
Some of the noteworthy conclusions reached by these researchers were:
• During kiln upsets, explosive gas mixtures might be formed. Although the gas mixtures tested are very
sensitive to the concentrations of CO and H2 in the mixture, the propensity to explode is far more dependent on
the O2 concentration in the background gas.
• The presence of cement dust in the process stream should not be expected to suppress explo-sions in a
precipitator during kiln upsets.
• When the O2 concentration was increased from 8% to 9%, the flammability behavior changed drastically. For
small increases in CO concentration, exponential increases occurred in the quantity of dust required to
suppress an explosion. If the O2 concentration increased to 9%, the danger of an explosion was greatly
increased, even at CO levels of 5% – 7%.
Hawks and Chadbourne (1987) have investigated possible causes of CO emissions from kilns. Some of the
conclusions they reached were:
If a combustible dust or gas is sufficiently diluted with an inert dust or the oxygen in air is suffi-ciently diluted
with an inert gas, the mixture can be rendered incapable of sustaining a fire or explosion (Hertzberg and
Cashdollar, 1987). Based on laboratory testing, below 12% – 14% oxygen concentration (using nitrogen as a
diluent), flame propagation cannot be sustained in a ternary mixture of fuel-oxygen-nitrogen. Adding a safety
margin to those measured inerting levels leads to a recommended safe level of 8% oxygen for inerting organic
dusts at ambient temperature and pressure when inerting with nitrogen (Hertzberg and Cashdollar, 1987). In
addition to nitrogen, other gases such as water vapor and carbon dioxide can be used, and they are generally
more effec-tive than nitrogen (on a volumetric basis) (Hertzberg and Cashdollar, 1987).
Rock dust (generally limestone) is used to inert coal dust in coal mines. The literature suggests that a mixture
of 75% – 80% rock dust in coal dust could suppress explosions of combustible dust/air mixtures even with very
high ignition energies. However, rock dust is almost completely ineffective in stopping methane explosions. As
a result, the presence of even small amounts of methane virtu-ally eliminates the inerting effectiveness of rock
dust (Inculet and others, 1993).
Ignition of combustible hybrid mixtures can occur in several ways. According to Dobson ignition in an ESP can
occur by random arcing between discharge electrodes and collection plates igniting a combustible gas/air
mixture. If the concentration is high enough, an explosion will result. At lower concentrations, the ignited gases
may serve as an ignition source for combustible particulates in the ESP (Dobson, 1974; Mullinger, 1988).
Another ignition source, according to Dobson (1974), is spontaneous combustion of combustible particulates
captured in the APCD.
Combustible mixtures at elevated temperatures can autoignite if the temperature is sufficiently high. The
minimum autoignition temperature (AIT) is sometimes also referred to as the minimum cloud ignition
temperature. The minimum AIT is usually approached only at high dust concentra-tions. The lean flammability
limit curve at varying temperatures and the minimum AIT curve at varying temperatures delineate regions that
do not ignite, regions that are ignitable by an external source, and an area that will autoignite at a given
temperature and combustible dust concentration (Hertzberg and others, 1985).
Information concerning the lower explosive limits or the AIT must be used with caution. The test data used to
develop these values may only provide relative values because the volume of the test chamber appears to have
an effect on the minimum spark energy required to ignite varying concentrations of coal dust (Hertzberg and
others, 1985).
Dobson (1974) suggests that an alarm to the operator should sound at 1% combustibles in kiln exhaust gases
and that power to an ESP should be shut off automatically at 2% combustibles. Some plants in the past have
shut off the power to the ESP at levels ranging between 0.7% – 1.5%combustibles.
Mullinger (1988) and Alsop and Post (1995) have identified kiln startups or when changing from one fuel to
another as particularly dangerous periods. During these periods, excess fuel may be supplied to the kiln, which
results in unburned gases and fuel entering the APCD. The risk arises when the unburned material encounters
ambient air leaks, which provide a source of oxygen, or when the excess fuel situation is corrected and excess
oxygen becomes available (Mullinger, 1988).
REFERENCES
Alsop, P. A., and Post, J. W., Cement Plant Operations Handbook – for Dry Process Plants, Tradeship
Publications, Ltd., Portsmouth, England, 1995.
Christensen, N. H., and Johansen,V., F. L. Smidth and Co. A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark, Private communication
with F. M. Miller, CTL, Skokie, Illinois.
Conti, R. S., and Hertzberg, M., “Thermal Autoignition Temperatures from the 1.2-L Furnace and Their Use in
Evaluating the Explosion
Potential of Dusts, ” Industrial Dust Explosions, ASTM STP 958, Kenneth L. Cashdollar and Martin Hertzberg,
Eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1987.
Dahl, L. A., New Study on Reactions in Burning Cement Raw Materials, RX059, Portland Cement Association,
Skokie, Illinois, 1956, 25 pages.
Dobson, Paul H., “Preventing Damage to Electrostatic Precipitators,” Rock Products, March 1974.
Gaulitz, R.; Schwiete, H. E.; and Tiklen, A. Tin, Zement Kalk Gips, Vol. 15, page 104, 1962.
Hansen, Eric R., “The Use of Carbon Monoxide and Other Gases for Process Control,” IEEE Transactions on
Industry Applications, Vol IA-22, No. 2, March/April, 1986.
Hawks, Ronald L., and Chadbourne, John F., “Modifications to Precalciner Kiln Combustion Systems to Prevent
Carbon Monoxide Electrostatic Precipitator Trips,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. IA-23; No. 2;
March/April, 1987.
Hertzberg, M., and Cashdollar, K. L., “Introduction to Dust Explosions,” Industrial Dust Explosions, ASTM STP
958, K. L. Cashdollar and M. Hertzberg, Eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, 1987.
Hertzberg, M.; Conti, R. S.; and Cashdollar, K. L., Electrical Ignition Energies and Thermal Autoignition
Temperatures for Evaluating Explosion Hazards of Dusts, RI 8988, U.S. Bureau of Mines, Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania, 1985.
Inculet, Ion I.; Peter Castle, G. S.; Weckman, Elizabeth J.; Shelstad, K. A.; and Wick, Martin L., IEEE Transactions
on Industry Applications, Vol. 29, No. 1, January/February, 1993.
Lea, F. M., The Chemistry of Cement and Concrete, 3rd Ed., John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, NY, 1970.
Lea, F. M., and Parker, T. W., Paper No. 16, Building Research Technology, H.M.S.O., London, 1935.
Lea, F. M., and Parker, T. W., The Quaternary System CaO-Al2O3-SiO2-Fe2O3 in Relation to Cement Technology,
Building Research Technical Paper No. 16, Garston, UK: Building Research Establishment, 1935, 52 pages.
Leonard, J. W., Editor, Coal Preparation, 4th Edition, The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and
Petroleum Engineers, Inc., 1979.
Miller, F. M., “Microscopy as an Aid in Evaluation of Mix Burnability and Clinker Formation,” Ciments, Betons,
Platres, Chaux, No. 731, pages 212-218, April 1981.
Mullinger, Peter, “Safe Light-up and Warm-up of Rotary Kilns,” World Cement, March 1988.
Mullinger, Peter J., and Jenkins, Barrie G., “Optimising Precalciner Design and Performance,” World Cement,
April 1996.
Napier, D. H., and Roopchant, D. R., “Ignition Probability of Hybrid Mixtures,” Industrial Dust Explosions, ASTM
STP 958, Kenneth L. Cashdollar and Martin Hertzberg, Eds., American Society for Testing and Materials,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1987.
Oates, J. A. H., Lime and Limestone – Chemistry and Technology, Production and Uses, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,
Germany, 1998.
Peray, K. E., The Rotary Cement Kiln, 2nd Ed. Chemical Publishing Co., Inc., New York, NY, 1986.
Perry, R. H.; Green, D. W.; and Maloney, J. O., Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ Handbook, 6th Ed., McGraw Hill, Inc.,
New York, NY, 1984.
Schobert, H. H., Coal, The Energy Source of the Past and Future, American Chemical Society, 1987.
Wiemann, W., “Influence of Temperature and Pressure on the Explosion Characteristics of Dust/Air and
Dust/Air/Inert Gas Mixtures,” Industrial Dust Explosions, ASTM STP 958, Kenneth L. Cashdollar and Martin
Hertzberg. Eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1987.
« Previous Post Next Post
»
PREVIOUS NEXT
Leave a Reply