Jean Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development
Jean Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development
Development
Introduction
Jean Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development is a foundational theory in child
psychology and education. It describes how children's cognitive abilities develop from
infancy to adolescence, and provides a framework for understanding how children
learn and make sense of the world around them.
Core to Jean Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development is the concept that children
move through four primary stages as they grow and develop:
1. Sensorimotor stage: this stage occurs from birth to around age 2, and is
characterized by the development of basic motor skills and the ability to
perceive and interact with objects.
2. Preoperational stage: this stage occurs from around age 2 to 7, and is
characterized by the development of language and symbolic thinking, as well as
the emergence of egocentrism.
3. Concrete operational stage: this stage occurs from around age 7 to 11, and is
characterized by the ability to think logically about concrete objects and events.
4. Formal operational stage: this stage occurs from around age 11 to adulthood,
and is characterized by the ability to think abstractly and reason hypothetically.
Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development also emphasises several key features linked
to the stages of development:
• Emphasis on the child's active role in learning: Piaget believed that children
learn by actively exploring and manipulating their environment, rather than
passively receiving information from adults.
• Constructivist approach to learning: Piaget believed that children actively
construct their own understanding of the world, rather than simply absorbing
information from their environment.
• Schemas: Schemas are Piaget's term for the mental frameworks that help
individuals understand and interpret information. As children grow and learn,
their schemas become more numerous and elaborate.
• Assimilation: Assimilation is the process by which a person takes in new
information and incorporates it into preexisting ideas and schemas. It plays a
key role in cognitive development by allowing individuals to integrate new
experiences and knowledge.
• Accommodation: Accommodation is when a person alters existing schemas, or
creates new ones, in response to new information that contradicts their existing
understanding. This process is essential for cognitive development, as it enables
flexibility and adaptation in learning.
• Equilibration: Piaget believed that children progress through the cognitive
developmental stages by the mechanism of equilibration, a balance between
assimilation and accommodation. Equilibration helps explain how children shift
from one stage of thought to the next.
There are many practical applications of Piaget's theory in early years education and
beyond:
In the following sections, we will explore each of these stages and key features in more
detail, and discuss the practical applications of Piaget's theory in early years education
and beyond.
Jean Piaget was born on 9 August 1896 in Neuchâtel, Switzerland (Vidal, 1994). From a
young age, he demonstrated a keen interest in the natural sciences, publishing his first
scientific paper at the age of 10 (Piaget, 1952). Piaget pursued his passion for science at
the University of Neuchâtel, where he earned his doctorate in natural sciences in 1918
(Piaget, 1952).
Piaget's prolific research and innovative ideas earned him numerous awards, such as
the Erasmus Prize in 1972 and the Balzan Prize in 1978 (Kohler, 2008).
Piaget developed his groundbreaking theories during the early to mid-20th century, a
time of significant intellectual ferment and change.
In the realm of psychology, the dominant perspective was behaviourism, which focused
on observable behaviours and discounted the importance of mental processes
(Watson, 1913). Behaviourists believed that learning was a result of associations
between stimuli and responses, and that the mind was a "black box" that could not be
studied scientifically. Piaget, however, challenged this view, arguing that cognitive
development was a complex process that involved the active construction of
knowledge by the child.
Beyond these specific influences, Piaget's work was situated within the broader context
of the early 20th century, a period marked by rapid advances in science, technology,
and social change. The rise of evolutionary theory, the emergence of new fields like
anthropology and sociology, and the aftermath of World War I all contributed to a
climate of intellectual upheaval and questioning of traditional assumptions. In this
context, Piaget's emphasis on understanding the mind and the processes of knowledge
acquisition fit with a broader interest in the nature of human experience and
development.
Although Piaget is often portrayed as a solitary genius, he was also part of a community
of scholars and researchers who influenced and supported his work. Piaget studied
under the psychologist Alfred Binet in Paris, and later collaborated with colleagues like
Bärbel Inhelder and Alina Szeminska in Geneva. These relationships likely shaped and
refined Piaget's ideas, even as he developed his own unique perspective.
Piaget's theory, with its emphasis on the active role of the child in constructing
knowledge through interactions with the environment, represented a significant break
from prevailing behaviourist views. Drawing on influences from philosophy, biology,
and beyond, Piaget's work emerged as a powerful new perspective that would shape
the field of developmental psychology for generations to come. By situating Piaget's
ideas within the rich intellectual and historical context of his time, we can better
appreciate the originality and significance of his contributions.
Piaget proposed four stages of cognitive development that children progress through as
they grow and develop:
• Children develop language and symbolic thinking but are still limited by
egocentrism and centration
• Symbolic thought allows children to represent objects and ideas through words,
gestures, and symbols
o Pretend play becomes more elaborate and complex, with children using
objects to represent other things (e.g., using a block as a phone)
• Egocentrism refers to the inability to take others' perspectives and the belief
that others see the world the same way they do
o Piaget demonstrated egocentrism through the three-mountain task,
where children struggled to understand how a scene would look from
another person's viewpoint
• Centration is the tendency to focus on a single aspect of a situation while
ignoring other relevant details
o The classic conservation tasks, such as the conservation of liquid task,
highlight how centration can lead to incorrect judgments about quantity
• Example 1: A 3-year-old child engages in pretend play, using a block as a phone
and having an imaginary conversation. This demonstrates the development of
symbolic thought, as the child can use objects to represent other things.
• Example 2: A 4-year-old child struggles with the classic conservation of liquid
task. When liquid is poured from a short, wide glass into a tall, thin glass, the
child believes that there is more liquid in the tall glass, demonstrating the
limitation of centration.
• Case Study: In a classic study by Piaget and Inhelder (1956), children were
asked to describe what a scene would look like from another person's
perspective. A 4-year-old child, when asked to describe what a doll would see
when placed in a different position, responded by describing their own view,
demonstrating egocentrism.
• Children develop logical reasoning abilities but are still limited to thinking
about concrete, tangible objects
• Conservation, the understanding that quantity remains constant despite
changes in appearance, is a key milestone during this stage
o Children can solve conservation tasks and understand that physical
properties of objects remain constant despite changes in arrangement or
appearance
• Classification and seriation abilities also develop during this stage
o Children can group objects based on shared characteristics
(classification) and order objects based on a specific dimension, such as
size or weight (seriation)
• Social cognition improves, with children becoming more able to take others'
perspectives and engage in cooperative play
• Example 1: An 8-year-old child successfully solves a conservation of number
task. When presented with two rows of coins, one spread out and one close
together, the child understands that the number of coins remains the same,
demonstrating the ability to conserve quantity.
• Example 2: A 10-year-old child participates in a group project at school,
demonstrating improved social cognition and the ability to take others'
perspectives. The child can work collaboratively, listen to others' ideas, and find
compromises when disagreements arise.
• Case Study: In a study by Piaget and Szeminska (1952), children were given
conservation of length tasks. A 7-year-old child, when presented with two sticks
of equal length arranged in a cross shape, understood that the sticks remained
the same length even though one looked longer, demonstrating the ability to
conserve length.
Each stage represents a qualitative change in cognitive abilities, and children must
progress through the stages sequentially.
Schemas
Schemas are mental structures that organise knowledge and guide behaviour (Piaget,
1936/1952). They are the basic building blocks of cognitive development. As children
interact with their environment, they develop and modify their schemas to better
understand the world around them.
For example, a child may have a schema for a dog that includes four legs, fur, and a tail.
When they encounter a cat, they may initially try to fit the cat into their existing dog
schema before developing a new schema for cats.
Adaptation Processes
Piaget identified two key processes that enable children to adapt their schemas to new
information: assimilation and accommodation (Piaget, 1936/1952).
Equilibration
Piaget's key concepts and theories are interconnected and work together to explain
cognitive development in children. Schemas are the mental structures that children
develop and adapt through the processes of assimilation and accommodation.
Equilibration is the driving force behind cognitive development, as children work to
restore cognitive equilibrium when faced with new information.
Several factors can influence a child's progression through the stages of cognitive
development:
Understanding these factors can help educators and caregivers support children's
cognitive development by providing appropriate experiences and interactions.
Jean Piaget's Contributions to the Field of Education
and Child Development
Jean Piaget's groundbreaking work has had a profound impact on the field of education
and our understanding of child development. His ideas have shaped educational
practices, provided new insights into how children learn and grow, and remain highly
relevant to contemporary education.
Piaget's work has also influenced the development of age-appropriate curricula that
align with the stages of cognitive development. Early childhood education programs
often focus on hands-on, sensory experiences that support the development of
schemas during the sensorimotor stage, while primary school curricula may emphasise
concrete, manipulative activities that help children develop logical thinking during the
concrete operational stage.
Piaget's work has also shed light on the importance of social interaction and peer
collaboration in cognitive development. His ideas have been extended by other
theorists, such as Lev Vygotsky, who emphasised the role of social interaction and
scaffolding in supporting children's learning (Vygotsky, 1978).
For example, studies have shown that children who engage in collaborative problem-
solving activities with peers often demonstrate higher levels of cognitive development
than those who work independently (Dillenbourg, 1999). This highlights the importance
of providing opportunities for children to work together and learn from each other in
educational settings.
Recent research has also built upon Piaget's work to explore the role of technology in
supporting cognitive development. For example, studies have investigated how
interactive digital tools can be used to support the development of spatial reasoning
skills during the concrete operational stage (Hawes et al., 2015).
In addition, Piaget's ideas about the importance of active learning and exploration have
informed the design of inclusive educational practices that seek to engage all learners.
For example, Universal Design for Learning (UDL) is an approach that emphasises the
creation of flexible learning environments that can accommodate the diverse needs
and abilities of all students (CAST, 2018). This approach is grounded in the idea that
children actively construct their own understanding and that educators must provide
multiple means of engagement, representation, and expression to support this
process.
Some researchers have criticised Piaget's research methods, citing concerns such as:
Some researchers have challenged Piaget's key concepts and theories, such as:
These challenges highlight the need for early years professionals to consider alternative
perspectives and adapt Piaget's ideas to meet the diverse needs of children in their
care.
Critics have argued that Piaget's theory may not fully account for the role of social,
cultural, and historical contexts in shaping child development (Vygotsky, 1978). For
example, research has shown that children's cognitive development can be influenced
by factors such as:
Early years professionals should consider these contextual factors when applying
Piaget's ideas in their practice and strive to create culturally responsive learning
environments.
While the criticisms and limitations of Piaget's work are important to consider, his ideas
still provide valuable insights into child development. Early years professionals can
address these limitations by:
• Taking a flexible approach to applying Piaget's theories, recognising that children
may progress through stages at different rates or in different ways (Lourenço &
Machado, 1996)
• Incorporating other perspectives, such as sociocultural theories, to gain a more
comprehensive understanding of child development (Rogoff, 2003)
• Adapting activities and teaching strategies to meet the diverse needs and
backgrounds of children in their care (Greenfield, 2000)
By using Piaget's work as a starting point and integrating other research findings and
perspectives, early years professionals can enhance their practice and support
children's learning and development more effectively.
• Consider the stages of cognitive development: Plan activities that align with
children's current stage of cognitive development, providing challenges that
promote growth without causing frustration.
• Example: For children in the preoperational stage, focus on activities that involve
symbolic thinking, such as pretend play or drawing.
• Adapt activities to individual needs: Recognise that children develop at
different rates and may exhibit characteristics of multiple stages
simultaneously. Differentiate activities to accommodate individual learning
needs and styles.
• Example: Offer a range of activities with varying levels of complexity, allowing
children to choose tasks that match their abilities and interests.
• Incorporate multiple domains of development: Design activities that integrate
cognitive, social, emotional, and physical development, as these domains are
interconnected and influence each other.
• Example: Create a gardening project that involves planning, measuring,
collaborating, and caring for plants, promoting holistic development.
Scaffolding Learning
By applying Piaget's ideas in these various areas of the curriculum, early years
professionals and educators can create a rich and stimulating learning environment
that supports children's cognitive development and lays the foundation for future
learning success. It is essential to remember that the goal is not to push children to
reach developmental milestones faster, but rather to provide experiences that
challenge and support their natural curiosity and growth.
Applying Piaget's ideas in practice can sometimes be challenging due to factors such
as:
• Start small by incorporating Piaget's ideas into one or two activities or routines
and gradually expanding over time
• Collaborate with colleagues to share ideas, resources, and support for
implementing new practices
• Advocate for the importance of developmentally appropriate practice and the
value of play-based learning in promoting children's cognitive, social, and
emotional growth
• Seek out professional development opportunities to deepen their understanding
of Piaget's work and its practical applications
By being creative, flexible, and persistent in their efforts to apply Piaget's ideas in
practice, early years professionals can create learning environments that truly support
and nurture children's development.
• Similarities: Both theorists recognised the importance of active learning and the
role of social interaction in cognitive development. They also viewed language as
a crucial tool for learning and thought (Lourenço, 2012).
• Differences: Vygotsky placed greater emphasis on the role of social and cultural
factors in shaping development, while Piaget focused more on individual
cognitive processes. Vygotsky also introduced the concept of the "zone of
proximal development," suggesting that children can achieve higher levels of
learning with the guidance and support of more skilled peers or adults (Vygotsky,
1978).
For example, while Piaget might observe a child's individual problem-solving strategies,
Vygotsky would be more interested in how the child's interactions with others and their
cultural tools (such as language or symbols) shape their cognitive growth.
For instance, while Piaget might explore how a child's understanding of object
permanence develops through their interactions with the physical world, Erikson would
be more interested in how the child's relationships with caregivers shape their sense of
trust and autonomy.
For example, while Piaget might study how a child's problem-solving abilities develop
through their interactions with physical objects, Bronfenbrenner would also consider
how factors such as family dynamics, community resources, and cultural values shape
the child's cognitive growth.
Understanding the similarities and differences between Piaget's ideas and those of
other theorists can inform and enhance early years practice in several ways:
• Historical and cultural context: Theorists' ideas are shaped by the historical,
cultural, and disciplinary contexts in which they were developed. When
comparing theorists, it is important to consider how these contexts may
influence their perspectives and limit the generalisability of their ideas.
• Oversimplification: Comparing theorists can sometimes lead to oversimplifying
their ideas or failing to capture the nuances and complexities of their work. Early
years professionals should strive to engage with each theorist's ideas in-depth
and recognise that no single theory can fully explain the intricacies of child
development.
• Balancing multiple perspectives: Integrating ideas from different theorists can
be challenging, as their perspectives may not always align or may emphasise
different aspects of development. Early years professionals should use their
critical thinking skills to navigate these tensions and find ways to synthesise
multiple perspectives in their practice.
Piaget's ideas have inspired a wealth of contemporary research in the field of child
development. For example:
These research efforts have deepened our understanding of the complex and
multifaceted nature of child development, and have generated new insights and
strategies for supporting children's learning in early years settings.
Piaget's ideas have had a significant impact on educational policy and curriculum
development in early years settings. For instance:
These policies and curricula have shaped the landscape of early years education,
promoting practices that support children's holistic development and well-being.
However, translating Piaget's ideas into practice also presents challenges, such as
ensuring that play-based learning is purposeful and aligned with educational goals
(Wood, 2013).
Piaget's ideas continue to inform and guide the professional practice of early years
educators and caregivers in many ways. For example:
These practices have been adapted and modified to suit contemporary contexts and
challenges, such as incorporating new technologies or responding to the needs of
diverse learners. However, their grounding in Piaget's key concepts and theories
remains evident.
While Piaget's legacy is significant, his ideas are not without limitations or critiques. For
instance:
These critiques have informed contemporary research and practice, leading to new
directions and innovations in the field. For example, researchers are increasingly
exploring how children's learning is shaped by their cultural context and funds of
knowledge (González et al., 2005), and how educators can create more culturally
responsive learning environments.
Future directions for research and practice that build upon Piaget's legacy might
include:
Early years professionals and students are encouraged to engage critically and
creatively with Piaget's ideas, and to contribute to the ongoing development and
refinement of the field by pursuing new questions, methods, and applications that
address the changing needs and contexts of children and families.
Conclusion
Jean Piaget's groundbreaking work has had a profound and lasting impact on our
understanding of child development and early years education. Throughout this article,
we have explored Piaget's key concepts and theories, such as the stages of cognitive
development, schemas, adaptation processes, and equilibration. We have also
examined the practical applications of his ideas in early years settings, as well as his
influence on contemporary research and practice.
The implications of Piaget's work for early years professionals and educators are
significant and far-reaching. By understanding and applying his ideas, practitioners can:
Applying these strategies in early years settings can promote children's holistic
learning, development, and well-being, laying a strong foundation for their future
success.
However, it is important for early years professionals and students to engage critically
with Piaget's ideas and consider their limitations and potential adaptations. For
instance, his stage theory may not fully account for individual differences or cultural
variations in children's development (Rogoff, 2003). Additionally, some of his ideas may
need to be updated or extended in light of new research findings and societal changes.
Therefore, practitioners are encouraged to view Piaget's work as a starting point for
their own learning and reflections, rather than as a fixed set of rules to follow. Engaging
in ongoing professional development, staying informed about current research and
debates, and collaborating with colleagues can help practitioners adapt and refine
Piaget's ideas to better suit their specific contexts and experiences.
Ultimately, the enduring value of Piaget's work lies in its potential to inspire and guide
early years practice for generations to come. By applying his ideas in their own settings,
sharing their insights and innovations with others, and contributing to the ongoing
development of the field, early years professionals and students can help to extend
Piaget's legacy and make a positive difference in the lives of young children and their
families.
Each stage represents a qualitative change in how children think and reason about the
world around them. It's important to note that the age ranges are approximate and can
vary among individuals.
Each stage provides insights into the cognitive abilities and limitations of children at
different ages.
Understanding these stages can help educators, caregivers, and parents create age-
appropriate learning experiences, foster cognitive development through play, and
identify potential developmental delays. Piaget's theory emphasizes the importance of
active learning, exploration, and interaction with the environment in constructing
knowledge and understanding.
According to Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development the age ranges for each stage
are as follows:
It is important to note that these age ranges are approximate and can vary between
individuals. Children may progress through the stages at different rates, and some may
exhibit characteristics of multiple stages simultaneously. Additionally, more recent
research has led to some modifications and extensions of Piaget's original theory, such
as the recognition of greater cognitive abilities in infants and the influence of social and
cultural factors on cognitive development.
By understanding and applying Piaget's Theory, early childhood educators can create a
supportive learning environment that promotes children's cognitive, social, and
emotional development.
1. Sensorimotor Stage:
o Observe infants' reactions to stimuli and their exploration of the
environment using senses and motor skills.
o Look for the development of object permanence, such as searching for
hidden objects.
o Notice the progression from reflexive behaviors to intentional actions and
problem-solving.
2. Preoperational Stage:
o Listen for the use of symbolic language and observe pretend play.
o Identify instances of egocentrism, such as a child struggling to see things
from another's perspective.
o Notice centration, where a child focuses on one aspect of a situation
while neglecting others.
o Observe a lack of conservation understanding, such as believing that a
tall, thin glass contains more liquid than a short, wide one.
3. Concrete Operational Stage:
o Observe children's ability to classify objects based on similarities and
differences.
o Look for the ability to seriate, or order objects logically, such as from
smallest to largest.
o Test for conservation understanding by asking questions about the
equality of quantities after changing their appearance.
o Notice decentration, where children consider multiple aspects of a
situation simultaneously.
4. Formal Operational Stage:
o Engage adolescents and adults in discussions about hypothetical
situations and abstract concepts.
o Observe their ability to formulate and test hypotheses systematically.
o Look for the capacity to think abstractly and reason about concepts not
tied to concrete objects.
o Notice metacognition, or the ability to reflect on one's own thought
processes.
For more information on applying Piaget's ideas in early years settings, see the
"Practical Applications" section of this article.
While Piaget and Vygotsky both emphasised the active role of children in constructing
knowledge, there are some key differences between their theories:
Yes, Piaget's ideas can be adapted to support the learning and development of children
with special educational needs and disabilities:
However, it is important to recognise that Piaget's theory may not fully account for the
diverse factors that can influence the development of children with special educational
needs and disabilities, and to draw on a range of theoretical perspectives and
evidence-based practices to support their learning and well-being.
While some aspects of Piaget's theory have been challenged and refined over time, his
core ideas continue to shape the way we think about children's cognitive development.
While Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development has had a profound impact on our
understanding of child development, it has also faced several criticisms over the years.
Some of the main critiques of Piaget's theory and its impact include:
Yes, Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development has undoubtedly helped progress our
understanding of child development. The theory has made significant contributions to
the field of developmental psychology and has had a lasting impact on our knowledge
of how children learn and think. Here are some key ways in which Piaget's theory has
advanced our understanding of child development:
While Piaget's theory has faced some criticisms and modifications over time, its core
principles have undeniably advanced our understanding of child development. The
theory has served as a catalyst for further research and has provided a framework for
supporting children's cognitive growth in both educational and family settings. Piaget's
enduring legacy lies in his pioneering work that has shaped our understanding of how
children think, learn, and develop.
Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development was not initially disregarded; rather, it was
met with a mix of interest, scepticism, and gradual acceptance within the scientific
community. When Piaget first introduced his ideas in the 1920s and 1930s, his work
was considered groundbreaking and innovative, as it challenged prevailing views of
children's cognitive abilities and development.
1. Early reception: Piaget's early work, such as "The Language and Thought of the
Child" (1923) and "The Child's Conception of the World" (1926), attracted the
attention of psychologists and educators who were intrigued by his novel
approach to understanding children's thinking. However, his ideas also faced
some initial scepticism, as they diverged from the dominant behaviorist
perspective of the time.
2. Gradual acceptance: As Piaget continued to publish his research and refine his
theory throughout the 1930s and 1940s, his work gained increasing recognition
and acceptance within the field of developmental psychology. His books, such
as "The Origins of Intelligence in Children" (1936) and "The Construction of
Reality in the Child" (1937), provided detailed observations and theoretical
insights that supported his stage-based model of cognitive development.
3. Influence on education: Piaget's theory began to have a significant impact on
educational practices in the 1960s and 1970s, as educators sought to apply his
insights to classroom teaching and curriculum design. The emphasis on active
learning, hands-on experiences, and age-appropriate activities aligned with
Piaget's view of children as active constructors of knowledge.
4. Criticisms and refinements: As Piaget's theory gained prominence, it also
attracted criticisms and further research. Some researchers questioned the
universality of the stages, the underestimation of children's abilities, and the
lack of attention to social and cultural factors. These critiques led to
modifications and refinements of Piaget's original ideas, as well as the
development of neo-Piagetian theories and alternative perspectives on cognitive
development.
While Piaget's theory may have initially faced some scepticism and resistance, it was
not disregarded. Instead, his work gradually gained recognition and acceptance as a
seminal contribution to the field of developmental psychology. The theory's influence
on education, research, and our understanding of children's cognitive development is a
testament to its enduring significance, even as it has undergone modifications and
faced criticisms over time.
Has the view of Piaget's theory changed since it was first introduced?
While the theory remains influential and is still considered a foundational framework in
developmental psychology, it has undergone significant scrutiny, modifications, and
refinements over time. Here are some key ways in which the perception of Piaget's
theory has changed:
In summary, while the view of Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development has evolved
since its introduction, with criticisms, modifications, and refinements, the theory's core
principles and its significant impact on our understanding of child development remain
widely acknowledged. Piaget's work continues to serve as a foundation for
contemporary research and practice in developmental psychology, even as the field
advances and incorporates new insights and perspectives.
References
• Baldwin, J. M. (1902). Development and evolution. Macmillan.
• Berk, L. E., & Winsler, A. (1995). Scaffolding children's learning: Vygotsky and
early childhood education. National Association for the Education of Young
Children.
• Bergson, H. (2001). Time and free will: An essay on the immediate data of
consciousness. (F. L. Pogson, Trans.). Dover Publications. (Original work
published 1889)
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by
nature and design. Harvard University Press.
• Bronson, M. B. (2000). Self-regulation in early childhood: Nature and nurture.
Guilford Press.
• Carpendale, J. I., & Lewis, C. (2004). Constructing an understanding of mind: The
development of children's social understanding within social interaction.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(1), 79-96.
• Case, R. (1985). Intellectual development: Birth to adulthood. Academic Press.
• CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning guidelines version 2.2. Retrieved
from http://udlguidelines.cast.org
• Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in
early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 (3rd ed.).
National Association for the Education of Young Children.
• Daniels, H., & Diack, H. (1977). Piagetian tests for the primary school. Routledge
and Kegan Paul.
• DeVries, R. (2000). Vygotsky, Piaget, and education: A reciprocal assimilation of
theories and educational practices. New Ideas in Psychology, 18(2-3), 187-213.
• DeVries, R., Zan, B., Hildebrandt, C., Edmiaston, R., & Sales, C. (2002).
Developing constructivist early childhood curriculum: Practical principles and
activities. Teachers College Press.
• DeVries, R., & Zan, B. (1994). Moral classrooms, moral children: Creating a
constructivist atmosphere in early education. Teachers College Press.
• Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P.
Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational
approaches (pp. 1-19). Elsevier.
• Donaldson, M. (1978). Children's minds. Fontana Press.
• Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
• Elder, G. H. (1998). The life course as developmental theory. Child Development,
69(1), 1-12.
• Epstein, J. L. (2001). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing
educators and improving schools. Westview Press.
• Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). Norton.
• Fisher, K., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Singer, D. G., & Berk, L. (2011).
Playing around in school: Implications for learning and educational policy. In A.
D. Pellegrini (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the development of play (pp. 341-
360). Oxford University Press.
• Flavell, J. H. (1963). The developmental psychology of Jean Piaget. Van
Nostrand.
• Forman, G. E., & Hall, E. (2005). Wondering with children: The importance of
observation in early education. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 7(2), 1-11.
• Fosnot, C. T. (1996). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice.
Teachers College Press.
• Gilleard, C., & Higgs, P. (2016). Connecting life span development with the
sociology of the life course: A new direction. Sociology, 50(2), 301-315.
• González, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing
practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
• Gonzalez-Mena, J. (2008). Diversity in early care and education: Honoring
differences (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• Greenfield, P. M. (2000). Three approaches to the psychology of culture: Where
do they come from? Where can they go? Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3(3),
223-240.
• Hawes, Z., Moss, J., Caswell, B., & Poliszczuk, D. (2015). Effects of mental
rotation training on children's spatial and mathematics performance: A
randomized controlled study. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 4(3), 60-
68.
• Henson, K. T. (2003). Foundations for learner-centered education: A knowledge
base. Education, 124(1), 5-16.
• Hirschfeld, L. A., & Gelman, S. A. (1994). Mapping the mind: Domain specificity
in cognition and culture. Cambridge University Press.
• Hoff, E. (2013). Language development (5th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Kant, I. (1998). Critique of pure reason (P. Guyer & A. W. Wood, Trans.).
Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1781)
• Knopf, H. T., & Swick, K. J. (2007). How parents feel about their child's
teacher/school: Implications for early childhood professionals. Early Childhood
Education Journal, 34(4), 291-296.
• Kohler, R. (2008). Jean Piaget. Bloomsbury Academic.
• Kuhn, D., & Angelev, J. (1976). An experimental study of the development of
formal operational thought. Child Development, 47(3), 697-706.
• Lee, K., & Zentall, S. S. (2012). Psychostimulant and sensory stimulation
interventions that target the reading and math deficits of students with ADHD.
Journal of Attention Disorders, 16(4), 308-329.
• Lourenço, O. (2012). Piaget and Vygotsky: Many resemblances, and a crucial
difference. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(3), 281-295.
• Lourenço, O., & Machado, A. (1996). In defense of Piaget's theory: A reply to 10
common criticisms. Psychological Review, 103(1), 143-164.
• McGarrigle, J., & Donaldson, M. (1974). Conservation accidents. Cognition, 3(4),
341-350.
• Mercer, N. (2013). The social brain, language, and goal-directed collective
thinking: A social conception of cognition and its implications for understanding
how we think, teach, and learn. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 148-168.
• Morra, S., & Borella, E. (2015). Working memory training: From metaphors to
models. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1097.
• Ojose, B. (2008). Applying Piaget's theory of cognitive development to
mathematics instruction. The Mathematics Educator, 18(1), 26-30.
• Pascual-Leone, J. (1970). A mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget's
developmental stages. Acta Psychologica, 32, 301-345.
• Piaget, J. (1952). The child's conception of number. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
• Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. (M. Cook, Trans.). W W
Norton & Co. (Original work published 1936)
• Piaget, J. (1962). The language and thought of the child (3rd ed.). (M. Gabain,
Trans.). Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1923)
• Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibration of cognitive structures: The central problem of
intellectual development. (T. Brown & K. J. Thampy, Trans.). University of
Chicago Press. (Original work published 1975)
• Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1956). The child's conception of space. Routledge &
Kegan Paul.
• Piaget, J., & Szeminska, A. (1952). The child's conception of number. Routledge
& Kegan Paul.
• Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University
Press.
• Rosa, E. M., & Tudge, J. (2013). Urie Bronfenbrenner's theory of human
development: Its evolution from ecology to bioecology. Journal of Family Theory
& Review, 5(4), 243-258.
• Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional
model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31-38.
• Shapiro, L. (2019). Embodied cognition (2nd ed.). Routledge.
• Syed, M., & McLean, K. C. (2017). Erikson's theory of psychosocial development.
In E. Braaten (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of intellectual and developmental
disorders (pp. 578-581). SAGE Publications.
• Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the
development of cognition and action. MIT Press.
• Turiel, E. (2002). The culture of morality: Social development, context, and
conflict. Cambridge University Press.
• Vidal, F. (1994). Piaget before Piaget. Harvard University Press.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological
processes. Harvard University Press.
• Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological
Review, 20(2), 158-177.
• Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Harvard
University Press.
• Wood, E. (2013). Play, learning and the early childhood curriculum (3rd ed.).
SAGE Publications.
Recommended Books
• Berk, L. E., & Winsler, A. (1995). Scaffolding children's learning: Vygotsky and
early childhood education. National Association for the Education of Young
Children. https://www.naeyc.org/resources/pubs/books/scaffolding-childrens-
learning
o This book explores the implications of Vygotsky's sociocultural theory for
early childhood education, with a focus on the role of scaffolding in
supporting children's learning and development.
• DeVries, R., Zan, B., Hildebrandt, C., Edmiaston, R., & Sales, C. (2002).
Developing constructivist early childhood curriculum: Practical principles and
activities. Teachers College Press. https://www.tcpress.com/developing-
constructivist-early-childhood-curriculum-9780807742877
o This book provides a comprehensive guide to developing and
implementing a constructivist curriculum in early childhood settings,
drawing on the ideas of Piaget and other constructivist theorists.
• Wood, E. (2013). Play, learning and the early childhood curriculum (3rd ed.).
SAGE Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/play-learning-and-the-
early-childhood-curriculum/book236912
o This book examines the role of play in early childhood learning and
development, with a focus on how play can be integrated into the early
years curriculum to support children's cognitive, social, and emotional
growth.
Recommended Websites
Kathy Brodie