Scribd
Upload
7 views3 pages

Template Review

Uploaded by

Reqgi Frst Trasia
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
7 views3 pages

Template Review

Uploaded by

Reqgi Frst Trasia
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Review Form 1.

Journal Name: South Asian Journal of Research in Microbiology


Manuscript Number: Ms_SAJRM_118611
Title of the Manuscript:
Simple Framework of Cystitis: Diagnosis and medication-based Management

Type of the Article Narrative Review

General guideline for Peer Review process:

This journal’s peer review policy states that NO manuscript should be rejected only on the basis of ‘lack of Novelty’, provided the manuscript is scientifically robust and technically sound.
To know the complete guideline for Peer Review process, reviewers are requested to visit this link:

(https://www.journalsajrm.com/index.php/SAJRM/editorial-policy )

Created by: DR Checked by: PM Approved by: MBM Version: 1.7 (15-12-2022)
Review Form 1.7

PART 1: Review Comments

Reviewer’s comment Author’s comment (if agreed with reviewer, correct


the manuscript and highlight that part in the
manuscript. It is mandatory that authors should write
his/her feedback here)
Compulsory REVISION comments

1. Is the manuscript important for scientific community? The manuscript is important for scientific community
(Please write few sentences on this manuscript)
The title of article is suitable
2. Is the title of the article suitable?
(If not please suggest an alternative title)
The abstract of the article is comprehensive
3. Is the abstract of the article comprehensive?

4. Are subsections and structure of the manuscript Subsections and structure of the manuscript are appropriate
appropriate?

5. Do you think the manuscript is scientifically correct? This manuscript is scientifically correct

6. Are the references sufficient and recent? If you have Some references are more than 5 years ago
suggestion of additional references, please mention in the
review form.

(Apart from above mentioned 6 points, reviewers are free to


provide additional suggestions/comments)

Minor REVISION comments

1. Is language/English quality of the article suitable for English quality of the article is suitable for scholarly communication
scholarly communications?

Optional/General comments
Introduction should be has SPQR background
Conclusion should be describe the content

Created by: DR Checked by: PM Approved by: MBM Version: 1.7 (15-12-2022)
Review Form 1.7

PART 2:

Reviewer’s comment Author’s comment (if agreed with reviewer, correct the
manuscript and highlight that part in the manuscript. It is
mandatory that authors should write his/her feedback here)

(If yes, Kindly please write down the ethical issues here in details)
Are there ethical issues in this manuscript?

Are there competing interest issues in this manuscript? No

If plagiarism is suspected, please provide related proofs or web


No
links.

PART 3: Declaration of Competing Interest of the reviewer:

Here reviewer should declare his/her competing interest. If nothing to declare he/she can write “I declare that I have no competing interest as a reviewer”

PART 4: Objective Evaluation:

Guideline MARKS of this manuscript


Give OVERALL MARKS you want to give to this manuscript
( Highest: 10 Lowest: 0 )

Guideline:
Accept As It Is: (>9-10)
8,8
Minor Revision: (>8-9)
Major Revision: (>7-8)
Serious Major revision: (>5-7)
Rejected (with repairable deficiencies and may be reconsidered): (>3-5)
Strongly rejected (with irreparable deficiencies.): (>0-3)

PART 5: Reviewer Details:


This information is mandatory to prepare the Reviewer Certificate properly.
Certificate preparation will not be possible if incomplete information is received.

Name of the Reviewer Reqgi First Trasia


Department of Reviewer Parasitology
University or Institution of Reviewer Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Country of Reviewer Indonesia
Position: (Professor/lecturer, etc.) of Reviewer Lecturer
Email ID of Reviewer [email protected]
WhatsApp Number of Reviewer (Optional) +6281514442279
5-8 Keywords regarding expertise of Reviewer Parasitology, Infectious Disease, Biomedicine, Clinical Medicine, Public Health, Epidemiology

Created by: DR Checked by: PM Approved by: MBM Version: 1.7 (15-12-2022)

You might also like