STS Midterm PDF Falsifiability Theory
STS Midterm PDF Falsifiability Theory
Document Information (
The document discusses the concept of huma…
Original Description:
Save
Original Title
STS MIDTERM
Copyright
LESSON 1: HUMAN FLOURISHING
! "
friendship, wealth, and power.
! As time changes, elements that comprise human flourishing change, which is
subject to the dynamic social history as written by humans.
! Our concept of human flourishing today proves to be different from what Aristotle
originally perceived then―humans of today are expected to become a “man of
Facebook
the world.” Twitter
! Competition as means of survival has become passé; coordination is the new
trend.
$
! Interestingly, there exists a discrepancy between eastern and western
conceptions regarding society and human flourishing.
a. Chinese Confucian system or the Japanese Bushido, both of which
view the whole as greater than their components. The Chinese and the Japanese
encourage studies of literature, sciences, and art, not entirely for oneself but in
Email
service of a greater cause.
b. Greek Aristotelian view, on the other hand, aims for eudaimonia as the
ultimate good; there is no indication whatsoever that Aristotle entailed it
instrumental to achieve some other goals.
3. Formulate a hypothesis that could explain the said phenomenon. The goal is to
reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis for the study
4. Conduct the experiment by setting up the dependent and independent variables
5. Gather and analyze results
6. Formulate conclusions and provide recommendations
Verification Theory
The earliest criterion that distinguishes philosophy and science is verification
theory or also known as verificationism, verification principle, or verification criterion of
meaning. The idea proposes that a discipline is a science if it can be confirmed or
interpreted in the event of an alternative hypothesis is accepted. The verification theory
of meaning claims that the meaning of a sentence is the method of its verification. It is
the philosophical doctrine that only statements that are empirically verifiable through
senses are cognitively meaningful, or else they are truths of logic. This was espoused
by a movement in the early twentieth century or1920s called the “Vienna Circle”, a
group of scholars who believed that only those which can be observed should be
regarded as meaningful and reject those which cannot be directly accessed as
meaningless. It was a central thesis of logical positivism by the efforts of a group of
philosophers who sought to unify philosophy and science. Its shortcomings, however,
proved to be somewhat too risky – several budding theories that lack empirical results
might be shot down prematurely, causing slower innovation and punishing ingenuity of
newer, novel thoughts. Aside from discoveries in physics, Einstein’s theory, and
quantum mechanics critique, this theory completely fails to weed out bogus arguments
that explain things coincidentally. A classic example is an astrology, whose followers
are able to employ the verification method in ascertaining its reliability. The idea is that
since one already has some sort of expectation on what to find, they will interpret events
in line with said expectations. American philosopher Thomas Kuhn warned us against
bridging the gap between evidence and theory by attempting to interpret the former
according to our own biases, that is, whether or not, we subscribe to the theory.
Falsification Theory
The Falsification Theory, proposed by Karl Popper, is a way of demarcating
science from non-science. It suggests that for a theory to be considered scientific it
must be able to be tested and proven false. In a series of famous works starting in the
late 1950s, Popper criticized some (supposedly) scientific fields of study as insufficiently
rigorous. It seemed to him that some researchers were focused only on finding positive
evidence that could be used to confirm their favorite theories rather than really
challenging their theories by trying to find evidence against those theories. Falsifiability
is the capacity for some proposition, statement, theory or hypothesis to be proven
wrong. That capacity is an essential component of the scientific method and hypothesis
testing. The requirement of falsifiability means that conclusions cannot be drawn from
simple observation of a particular phenomenon. For example, the statement “all swans
are white” would be falsified by observing a black swan (or admitting the possibility of a
black swan somewhere in existence). If the statements are proven false, then it
becomes unreasonable to support the theory any longer.
Science as Education
Science, along with mathematics, were perceived as the most in-demand track
as people thought that these will land them high-paying jobs and lucrative careers after
graduation. In the Philippines, schools mostly use science and mathematics in entrance
exams at the secondary and tertiary levels to ensure the adeptness of students in the
aforementioned fields. This can be reflected in the number of students enrolled in STEM
(Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics)-offering schools.
However, when one student who came from a science high school was asked
to report Paul Feyerabend’s work How to Defend Society Against Science, he strongly
refused the idea of the author and critiqued him instead. This only proves that the
former kind of academic environment made students unwelcoming objections against
science. The idea of Paul Feyerabend aims to hone and preserve students’ capacity to
entertain other options and will allow students some level of unorthodoxy. It means that
his idea encourages students to accept facts other than what’s usual or accepted by
society. Innovations are brought by visionaries and not the prude legalists, which means
the creative ones are those who have wider perspectives and higher scale of
imagination and not those who just stick to norms. Similar to Aristotle’s concept of
Eudaimonic where a person is required to be knowledgeable not only on science but
also on other things of equal importance. He should not focus on one aspect alone but
rather as a whole. The reason why it is called science is because of the variety of
procedures it offers in an experiment to come up with the result.
It proves that there is liCle capacity for our ancestors to contemplate and perceive things outside
themselves in a more re<ec8ve maCer, with liCle to no access to wriCen accounts except several cave
drawings and unearthed ar8facts, It is hard to pinpoint where exactly this all started but the early
ancestors’ primal need to survive paved the way for the inven8ons using their wits to u8lize abundant
materials for their ease and comfort. For an instance:
Homo Erectus -used Kre to cook without realizing the law of fric8on and heat by tools from stone and
<ints that marked the Stone Age Era.
Venus Figure (Miniature statues prevalent in the Paleolithic Period)-a rudimentary carving of a
voluptuous woman out of ivory stone that infers a Kxa8on to female anatomy found in excava8ons in
diSerent parts of Europe.
Minerals-metalwork; substances that are more malleable, durable, and luster.Fur clothing and animal
skin -primarily used for comforts from harsh winds.
Early accessories-found in excava8ons that suggest an engagement to the concept of beauty. An ini8al
order of primi8ve God's
-ceremonial Kgures found in excava8ons pertained to prior civiliza8ons honoring dei8es for things out of
their control.
-in windy places like mountains, there are mountain gods to explain wind currents and ask for
provisions.
-in coastal areas, there are water gods when asking for a good catch.
Elephants and Mammoths majes8c creatures that might have been awed by their size and worship as
the owners of the land.
-On the contrary, might’ve hunted them for the en8re community to eat.
The earliest case of man-made ex8nc8on occurred 12,000 years ago brought by hun8ng and territorial
disputes.
-pertains to the ongoing ex8nc8on of several species both <ora and fauna due to human ac8vity.
Growing popula8on
-necessitated overhun8ng and overKshing which were endemic to the era causing several species to lose
compe8tors in food and territory.
Forma8on of communi8es
-paved the way for civiliza8ons as it caused humans to expand for in every factor.
The constant need for resources taught the early civiliza8ons to engage in less bloody nego8a8ons
through trade leading to cross towns and cross-cultural interac8ons. Wealth became the main goal for
survival, it triggered producing things in the prospect of proKt. As humanity became more complex, the
primary goal was not merely to survive, but to live a good life.
Mar8n Heidegger
-a philosopher in the advent of postmodernism who argued that the essence of purpose and being of
technology are diSerent from each other.
-Expounding a point that can be perceived; First, a means to achieve man’s ends. Second, paints
technologythat each period reveals a par8cular character regarding man’s being.
In conclusion, the Human condi8on improved but as to ini8al aims things did not much make a
diSerence as it is only a rehashed version of its formal self. Some people s8ll baCle for their daily
survival. The two paradigms; Religion and technology are s8ll being used as an aCempt to understand
circumstances. Aristotle’s concep8on of human <ourishing entertains the idea of holis8c enrichment of
person situated in his society which starters could consider for other concepts enlivened with
technological advancements through the notable dis8nc8on would fall under the considera8on of
virtues and their role in achieving a good life. Regardless, technological advancements although oSering
us a compelling no8on of the truth and the good, it s8ll occurs at a rapid pace that morality cannot seem
to keep up with, with no considera8on given in achieving the good life.
Introduc8on
`In the ancient Greece long before the word “science” has been coined, the need to understand the
world and the reality was bound with the need to understand the self and good life. `For Plato, the task
of understanding the things in the world runs parallel with the job of truly gecng into what will make
the soul <ourish.
In an aCempt to understand reality and the external world, man must seek to understand himself, too.
`It was Aristotle who gave the deKni8ve dis8nc8on between the theore8cal and prac8cal science
`Biology; `Metaphysics
`Ethics; and
`Poli8cs
`Every aCempt to know is connected in some way in an aCempt to Knd the “good” or as said in the
previous lesson, aCainment of human <ourishing.
`Rightly so, one must Knd the truth about what the good is before one can even try to locate that which
is good.
`We have seen how a misplaced or an erroneous idea of human<ourishing can turn tables for all of us;
`And, draw chasm between the search for truth and for the good.
Cancel Anytime.
Document 22 pages
Chapter 2
Pauline Añes
No ratings yet
Document 6 pages
Human Flourishing
Aira Galura
No ratings yet
Document 43 pages
Magazines Podcasts
Sheet music
Document 14 pages
STS Midterm
SUHARTO USMAN
No ratings yet
Document 42 pages
Human Flourishing
Dexter B. Baldisimo
No ratings yet
Document 3 pages
Human Flourishing
Handout
Thom Steve Ty
&100% (1)
Document 5 pages
Document 38 pages
Human Flourishing
anneemiraldcaldea6
No ratings yet
Document 4 pages
Human Flourishing:
Eudaimonia (Good…
Patrik Oliver Pantia
Spirited)
No ratings yet
Document 4 pages
Lesson 1 - Human
Flourishing
KARYLLE MAE MIRAFUENTES
No ratings yet
Document 73 pages
Chapter II
Crispino T. Dace
No ratings yet
Document 10 pages
Lesson 5-Human
Flourishing
Grizzel Domingo
No ratings yet
Show more
About Support
Pinterest
Legal
Terms
Privacy
Copyright
Cookie Preferences
Documents
Language: English
Save