5 and 6th Schedule, IGNOU
5 and 6th Schedule, IGNOU
12.0 OBJECTIVES
After reading this unit, you should be able to:
Identify the areas which are administered distinctly from most other parts of
the country;
Know the special provisions under the Fifth and Sixth Schedules of the
Constitution;
Give reasons for the introduction of these special provisions;
Understand the difference between the provisions under the Fifth and Sixth
Schedules of the Constitution; and
Understand the political dynamics related to these special provisions
12.1 INTRODUCTION
Although the Constitution of India seeks to provide a uniform rule over the whole
country, certain areas of the country are governed by special provisions. At the
time of the framing of the Constitution, the framers of the Constitution took note
of the fact that certain areas and communities in the country on account of their
isolated and primitive lifestyle need special consideration for safeguarding their
interests and advancing their socio-economic development. Article 244 in Part
X of the Constitution envisages a special system of administration of areas notified
as “Scheduled Areas” and “Tribal Areas”. According to Article 244(1), the
provisions of the Fifth Schedule shall apply to the administration and control of
* Dr.Nongmaithem Kishorchand Singh, Academic Associate, Faculty of Political Science, IGNOU, New
Delhi 117
Federalism and the Scheduled Areas and Scheduled Tribes in any states other than the four North-
Decentralization
Eastern states of Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram. Whereas, as per Article
244(2), the tribal-dominated areas in the above four States of Assam, Meghalaya,
Tripura and Mizoram are to be administered separately under the Sixth Schedule
of the Constitution. Under Article 244 and the Sixth Schedule, these areas are
specified as “Tribal Areas” which are technically different from the “Scheduled
Areas” under the Fifth Schedule. Thus, the Fifth and Sixth Schedules of the
Constitution have special provisions related to the administration and control of
such areas declared as “Scheduled Areas” and “Tribal Areas” respectively.
The Fifth Schedule assigns special responsibilities to the Governors for ensuring
peace and good governance in the Scheduled Areas. For this, as per the provision
119
Federalism and under Para 5(2), the Governor can make regulations in the Scheduled Areas
Decentralization
particularly for the following purposes:
i) to prohibit or restrict the transfer of land by or among the members of
Scheduled Tribes in such areas,
ii) to regulate the allotment of land to members of the Scheduled Tribes,
iii) to regulate the carrying on of business as money-lenders by persons who
lend money to members of the Scheduled Tribes in such area
Another significant provision for the administration and control of the Scheduled
Areas and Scheduled Tribes is the establishment of a Tribes Advisory Council
(TAC). Under Para 4 in part B of the Fifth Schedule, each state having Scheduled
Areas has the constitutional obligation to constitute a Tribes Advisory Council.
The President may also direct any state having Scheduled Tribes but not Scheduled
Areas to create a Tribes Advisory Council consisting of not more than twenty
members of whom nearly three-fourth shall be the representatives of Scheduled
Tribes in the State Assembly. As per the provisions are given in Para 4(2) of the
Fifth Schedule, the primary duty of the Tribes Advisory Council is to advise the
State Government on matters related to the welfare and advancement of Scheduled
Tribes in the state or on any matter which may have been referred to them by the
Governor.
Besides, under Article 339 (1) of the Constitution, the President may also appoint
a Commission to report on the administration of the Scheduled Areas and welfare
of the Scheduled Tribes in the states. As it was obligatory to appoint such
Commission at the end of the first ten years of the implementation of the
Constitution, the First Scheduled Areas and Scheduled Tribes Commission was
appointed in 1960, with U.N. Dhebar as the Chairman to address the overall
situation of the tribals, including the issue of land alienation in the tribal areas.
The Commission submitted its report in 1961. And in 2002, the Second
Commission was set-up under the Chairmanship of Shri Dileep Singh Bhuria
(The Bhuria Commission) to review the constitutional mechanisms for the welfare
and development of Scheduled Tribes.
Thus, the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution created an institutional mechanism
in the form of the Tribes Advisory Council for the administration of the Scheduled
Areas and the Scheduled Tribes in different parts of the country other than the
four North-Eastern States of Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram and Tripura. The four
States of North-East are excluded from the purview of the Fifth Schedule since
they are administered separately under the scheme of the Sixth Schedule.
According to Para 2(1) the Sixth Schedule, each Autonomous District shall have
a District Council consisting of not more than thirty members, out of which four
are nominated by the Governor while the rest are elected on the basis of adult
franchise (the newly added Bodoland Territorial Council is an exception; it can
have up to forty-six members). The Sixth Schedule conferred them certain
Executive, Legislative and Judicial powers so that they have got the autonomy
to make laws of their land, managing their forests (other than the reserved forest),
the appointment of traditional chiefs and headman, inheritance of property,
marriage, social customs, taxation etc. The power and functions of District
Councils and Regional Councils as given in the Sixth Schedule can be summarised
as:
i) Legislative Functions
One of the most important features of Sixth Schedule is the empowerment
of District Councils to make laws. Para 3 of the Sixth Schedule provides
the provision for the District Council and Regional Councils to make rules 121
Federalism and in respect of lands, management of forest (other than the Reserved Forest),
Decentralization
use of canal or water-course for agriculture, regulation of jhum and other
forms of shifting cultivation, establishment and administration of village or
town committees, appointment or succession of Chiefs or Headmen,
inheritance of property, marriage and divorce and social practice with the
prior approval of the Governor. Under Para 10 of the Schedule, the District
Council of an Autonomous District has the power to make law for the
regulations and control of money-lending or trading by any person other
than Scheduled Tribe residents in that Scheduled District. However, all laws
made under this provision shall have no effect until assented by the Governor
of the State.
The hilly regions of North-East India have a history of being governed differently
in comparison to the rest of India. While most of India with the exception of the
princely states were governed by the standard colonial administration, the hill
regions of the erstwhile State of undivided Assam (as most states which exist
today were then part of Assam) were ruled by the British indirectly. Since the
annexation of the tribal areas of North-East India, the British adopted a specialised
system of administration, designed to maintain as far as possible the cohesiveness
of the tribal societies by minimizing its administrative interference. The
Government of India Act, 1935, placed the hill regions of Assam in the “excluded”
category. As it was difficult for the British to administer such a vast hilly region,
the hilly areas of Assam were left to be governed by their traditional rules and
customs, which did not cost them anything. The people in this area did not want
any outsider rule over them.
The Sub-Committee for the North-East Frontier Tribal and Excluded Areas are
also known as Bordoloi Sub-Committee (named after its Chairman Gopinath
Bordoloi, a member of the Constituent Assembly, and the then Prime Minister of
undivided Assam) extensively toured the tribal areas of Assam and interacted
with the people and their representatives. The idea behind the visits was to have
a first-hand idea of the grievances and feeling of the tribals and also to investigate
into the causes of backwardness in the area. The Bordoloi sub-committee found
that the people in these tribal areas had traditional self-governing institutions
which functioned democratically and settled disputes according to their customs
and traditions. They were sensitive about their land, forest, lifestyle and traditional
system of justice. The Bordoloi Sub-Committee also observed that within the
Excluded Areas, there are smaller tribes having distinct culture, tradition, language
etc., which needed a special attention for the protection of their ethnic and cultural
identities from the dominant tribal community. Thus, on the recommendations
of the above mentioned two sub-committees, the Constitution Drafting Committee
included the provisions of the Fifth and Sixth Schedules in the draft Constitution
of February 1948 which were later incorporated as special provisions of the
Fifth and Sixth Schedules in the Constitution of India with its commencement
on January 26, 1950.
Check Your Progress Exercise 2
Note: 1) Use the space below for your answers
2) Check your answers with the model answers given at the end of this
unit.
1) What were the reasons for introducing the special provisions for the hill
areas of North-East India?
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
District Councils under the Sixth Schedule enjoy extensive powers, including
executive, legislative and judicial powers, all derived from the Constitution. On
the other hand, under the Fifth Schedule, the Tribes Advisory Councils being the
creation of the Legislative Assembly of the States have limited powers which are
mostly executive in nature. Unlike the provisions of the Sixth Schedule,
legislative, judicial, and financial powers are denied to the Fifth Scheduled
Areas. The executive power of the State also extends to the Scheduled Areas.
In financial matters also the Sixth Schedule empowers the District and Regional
Councils to mobilise resources. They are authorized to levy and collect land
revenue and taxes within their respective jurisdiction. Unlike them, the Tribes
Advisory Councils established under the provision of the Fifth Schedule are not
given the financial power for preparing budget for themselves. There is no
mentioning of sources of income or of grant-in-aid in the Fifth Schedule
provisions. However, since District Council or Tribes Advisory Councils are
created by the State Government, it is the moral duty of the State Governments
to give financial assistances to the Councils.
Again, regarding delegation of power, the Sixth Schedule provides a long list of
items on which the District and Regional Councils could exercise its power.
Whereas, the powers and functions which are to be delegated to the Tribes
Advisory Councils in the Fifth Scheduled Areas are minimal and primarily decided
by the State Cabinet. Therefore, the Autonomous District Councils established
under the Sixth Schedule have relatively much more power than the Tribes
Advisory Council under the Fifth Schedule. In fact, the Sixth Schedule is
sometimes referred to as a “mini-constitution” and District and Regional Councils
as ‘mini-state’ or state within a state since they have extensive legislative,
executive, financial, and judicial powers.
On the other hand, it has also been observed that there is a clear failure of policy
implementation at the local level. Despite the existence of several provisions in
the Constitution, the role of the Governor has remained very marginal. Though
the Governor is the constitutional head of the state appointed by the Central
Government, under Article 163 of the Constitution, the Governor is bound to
exercise his/her power with the ‘aid and advise’ of the Council of Ministers in
the state government. In such a system, Governors have not exercised any
significant role under the Fifth Schedule and wherever this has been so exercising
it has been on the advice of the Council of Ministers of the State. In other words,
the practice of the Governor is bound by Cabinet decisions and the policy of the
elected government. Lacking in statutory support, the activities of the TACs,
therefore, depend on the political party or parties that run the state administration.
On the other hand, a number of criticisms have been levelled against the
functioning of District and Regional Councils. Some sections of people alleged
that the Autonomous District and Regional Councils are used by some vested
interests. They are also accused of indulging in corruption and misuse of public
funds. Therefore, large sections of the people (mostly non-tribals) have been
questioning the relevance of the Councils from time to time and want revocation
of these special provisions.
12.8 REFERENCES
Bakshi, M. P. (1999). The Constitution of India (with selective comments by the
author). Delhi, India: Universal Law Publishing Company.
Basu, D.D. (1985). Introduction to the Constitution of India. New Delhi, India:
Prentice Hall.
Chakraborty, Kishore Amalendu (2004). The Quest for Identity: Tribal Solidarity
Movements in North-East India, 1947-69, Kolkata, India: The Asiatic Society.
Chaube, K. S. (1999). Hill Politics in North-East India. New Delhi, India: Orient
Longmen.
Mackenzie, Alexander (1884). History of the Relations of the Government with
the Hill Tribes of the North-East Frontier of Bengal, Government of India,
Calcutta.
127
Federalism and Ministry of Home Affairs (GOI), (1961). Report of the Commission on Scheduled
Decentralization
Areas and Scheduled Tribes. New Delhi.
The government of India (1971). The Debhar Committee Report of the Scheduled
Areas and Scheduled Tribes, New Delhi.
The government of India (2004). Report of the Scheduled Areas and Scheduled
Tribes Commission. New Delhi.
The Government of India Act, 1935.
128