Additional Questions
Additional Questions
Mall-Mart Ltd is a group that comprises trading subsidiaries that retail food, clothing and merchandise
throughout South Africa and the United Kingdom. You obtain the following relevant information from
the statement of financial position of Mall-Mart Ltd for the year ended 30 June 2017:
On 1 July 2016, Blue Orange Limited offered 500 000 13% debentures of R5 each for issue at a
premium of 3%. Only 80% of the debentures were taken up. These debentures are compulsorily
redeemable.
These debentures are repayable in 3 equal annual instalments over 3 years at a discount of 2%
starting on 30 June 2017.
Interest is paid annually, in arrears, on 30 June, which is also the company’s financial year end.
REQUIRED:
a) Identify, with reasons, which risks Mall-Mart may be exposed to. (10)
b) Calculate the internal rate of return of the debenture issue (show all cashflows). (7)
c) Record the above information in the journal entries of Blue Orange Limited for the years ending
30 June 2017. Narrations are NOT required.
(8)
3
QUESTION 2 (SUGGESTED SOLUTION)
PART B:
a) Cashflow: Marks
1/7/X6 2 060 000 1 (500 000*5*1.03*80%)
30/6/x7 (913 333)
-653 333 1 =(2000000*98%)/3
-260 000 1 ((2 000 000)*13%)
30/6/x8 -826 667
-653 333 1 =(2000000*98%)/3
-173 333 1 ((2 000 000-666667)*13%)
30/6/x9 -740 000
-653 333 1 =(2000000*98%)/3
-86 667 1 ((1333333-666667)*13%)
c) Debit Credit
1/7/x6 Bank 2 060 000 (1) ©
Debentures 2 060 000 (1)©
Amortisation table:
Year Cashflow Interest Principal Balance
cf0 2 060 000 2 060 000
cf1 -913 333 -211 583 -701 751 1 358 249
cf2 -826 667 -139 506 -687 161 671 088
cf3 -740 000 -68 927 -671 072 16
(diff = rounding)
TOTAL 15 MARKS
4
QUESTION 2 (Suggested solution)
a) Credit risk (1) as they are exposed to monies owed by receivables as well as, loans from
employees (1);
Liquidity risk (1): as they are exposed to long term debt (1)
Currency risk (1) : as they are exposed to the foreign currency (1)
Interest rate risk(1) as they are exposed to interest bearing liabilities (1)
Price risk (1): as they are exposed to equity instruments (1) (10)
marks)
5
QUESTION 3 19.5 Marks
1 Information
Atlantic Airlines Ltd (AA) is an airline that provides domestic and international flights across the
globe. It has a small treasury department focusing on investing and utilising the company’s funds for
investment purposes. AA has a financial year-end of 30 June and elected to early adopt IFRS 9
Financial Instruments in the 2017 reporting period.
You are the financial manager at AA and you have received the following email from John Smith, a
treasury clerk at AA, in connection with the debentures that were acquired by AA during the 2017
financial year:
1. Debentures
It came under my attention that AA bought some debentures during the 2017 financial
year. From the agreement between AA and the company the debentures were bought
from, I obtained the following information:
AA bought 450 000 debentures in cash for R1 455 882 on 1 July 2016, which equalled
their fair value on this date. These debentures have a nominal value of R1 each and earn
interest of 18% annually payable in arrears. The debentures are redeemable on 30 June
2022 at R5.50 per debenture. Brokerage fees of R5800 were paid by AA on the date of
purchase.
I am not sure how to journalise this transaction in the financial records and need to finish
the trial balance for the 2017 financial year end this week. Could you please provide me
with the necessary journal entries I need to process in connection with these debentures
as I do not have an idea where to start?
Regards,
John Smith
6
Marks
QUESTION 3 – REQUIRED Sub-
Total
total
a) Respond to the email received from John Smith. In your response:
Ignore taxation.
Total 19.5
7
To: John Smith
From Financial Manager
Subject: Debentures and shares bought during the 2017 financial year
Date: November 2017
Dear John
1. Debentures
Please see below the required journal entries and supporting calculations as requested.
01 July 2016
Dr. Financial Assets (Debentures) at FV through OCI 1 455
(SOFP) 882 1
1 455
Cr. Bank (SOFP) 882 0.5
Recognition of debentures bought on 1 July 2016
30 June 2017
81
Dr. Bank (SOFP) 000 1
Dr. Financial Assets (Debentures) at FV through OCI 119
(SOFP) 557 1
200
Cr. Interest received 557 2
Recognition of debentures bought on 1 July 2016
3
12
Dr. Impairment loss (P/L) 000 1
12
Cr Credit loss allowance (SOFP) 000 1
Recognising the credit loss allowance at initial
recognition
Workings
Students must show their inputs from financial calculator to obtain principle marks
2 475
Future Value (FV)
450000 x 5.50 000 1
1 455 882 + 5 1 461
Present Value (PV)
800 682 1
Number (N)
6 0.5
Interest (i) 13.72% 0.5
81
Payments (PMT)
000
Principal amount
When assessing the substance of the agreement between AA and Pumbaa, it is clear that AA has a contractual obligation to
deliver cash to Pumbaa on 30 June 2018.
1
The preference share agreement contains a mandatory redemption element. 1
The principal amount classifies as a financial
liability. 1
Dividends
There is a contractual obligation to deliver cash on a yearly basis of R8000 (8%) even if management decides not to declare a
dividend. 1
4
The dividend will accumulate even if the company did not have enough profits to declare and pay a preference dividend.
Therefore, if the dividend is not declared in one year it will be carried forward to the next year. 1
Since the preference shares are redeemable, the accumulated dividend will then be paid at redemption date, 30 June 2018. 1
Therefore, based on the substance of this transaction, AA has a contractual obligation to declare and pay all preference
dividends on or before 30 June 2018. 1
Based on the above, preference dividends are classified as a financial liability. 1
Conclusion
The preference shares are classified as a financial liability in the records of AA. 1
available marks 9
Max 7
Regards,
Financial Manager
Communication skills
- Mark should only be awarded if student gave
narrations 0.5
- Mark should only be awarded if student presented the answer in email format 0.5
-2
19.5
5
QUESTION 2 20 marks
Background
Marrayfield Limited (Marrayfield) is a company that teaches primary school learners mental
mathematics in South Africa. Marrayfield deploys a mental maths teacher to each school on contract.
The mental health syllabus is different from the government syllabus and is an optional subject.
Marrayfield has a 31 August year end.
You have joined the management team of Marrayfield as a trainee accountant and keen to impress
this small company so you can progress quickly to executive levels. You will be assisting the CFO
of the company, who has admitted to being unsure about the implications of IFRS9, IAS32 or any
International Financial Reporting Standard that deals with Financial Instruments.
Marrayfield won a Department of Education government contract to supply one teacher per primary
school in the Eastern Cape Region for the next five years. In addition to the normal growth, this
contract allowed Marrayfield to go to the market and search for investment opportunities. Marrayfield
entered into these transactions:
Information
Transaction 1: Pending, but virtually certain orders for the next five years
When you were chatting to the CFO, he said: “Clearly, the fact that we’ve won the contract to supply
mental maths professionals to South African Schools for the next five years gives us a right to future
cash flows. Surely this is an instrument with which we can make money. Surely that is a Financial
Instrument. The auditors claiming this is not a Financial Instrument. They are wrong!”
3
compulsory preference dividend at 10% p.a. on the issue price of R22 each. Dividends are payable
annually on 31 August.
Marks
QUESTION 2 – REQUIRED Sub-
Total
total
a) Transaction 1
Briefly discuss whether the agreement to supply mental maths teachers
to Eastern Cape Department of Education gives rise to a financial asset 4
in terms of IFRS 9.
(b) Transaction 2
Prepare Journal entries to record government gilts in the accounting
records of Marrayfield Limited for the year ended 31 August 2018. 10
(c) Transaction 3
Discuss the various classifications that Marrayfield Limited could use
when accounting for its financial asset.
6
Do not discuss measurement
Do not include any calculations
Total 20
4
Transaction 1
Transaction 2
01-Mar-
18
PMT 24 000 1
PV -270 000 0.5
N 3 0.5
FV 300 000 0.5
i 12.18
DR CR
Government Gilts SFP 270000 1
Bank 270000 1
Impairment loss
P/L 12 000 1
Credit loss allowance
SFP 12 000 1
30-Jun-
18
Government gilts SFP 10 958 1
interest income 10 958 1
270000*12.18*4/12 1.5
Capitalising 4 months interest to
the FA
10
Transaction 3
3
• Fair value through other comprehensive
income; and 0.5
• Fair value through profit or loss. IFRS
9.5.2.1 0.5
Deciding which classification is appropriate to the investment in the
preference shares will require Marrayfield Limited to assess:
• The objective of the business model used to manage
the financial asset; and 0.5
• The contractual cash flow characteristics of the
financial asset. IFRS 9.4.1.1 0.5
Amortised cost:
To classify the investment in preference shares at
amortised cost, both the following criteria must be satisfied:
• The investment must be held in terms of a business model the objective of which
is to hold it to collect the related contractual cash flows (held to collect); and 0.5
• The investment offers contractual terms that give rise to cash flows that
are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal. IFRS 9.4.1.2 0.5
APPLICATION: In this case, the investment in the preference shares offers
contractual cash flows that constitute solely a return of principal and interest on
that principal(1). This means that if the business model objective is to hold the
investment to collect the contractual cash flows, the investment must be classified
at amortised cost (AC), unless this classification would result in an accounting
mismatch in which case it could be classified at fair value through profit or loss
(FVPL) instead (see below). (1) 2
APPLICATION
In this case, the investment in the preference shares offers contractual cash flows that
constitute solely a return of principal and interest on that principal. This means that if the
business model objective is to hold the investment to collect the contractual cash flows
and to sell the investment, the investment must be classified at fair value through other
comprehensive income – debt (FVOCI-debt), unless this classification would result in an
accounting mismatch in which case it could be classified at fair value through profit or
loss (FVPL) instead (see below). 2
Fair value through profit or loss:
If either the business model test fails (i.e. the asset is held for trading) and/ or the contractual cash
flow test fails (i.e. the asset does not offer contractual cash flows, or the contractual cash flows
offered by the asset do not constitute purely a return of principal plus interest on principal), then the
investment in preference shares must be classified at fair value through profit or loss. IFRS 9.4.1.4 1
Similarly, if the investment met the requirements to be classified at amortised cost or met the
requirements to be classified at fair value through other comprehensive income but these
classifications would have led to an accounting mismatch, then Marrayfield could elect on initial
recognition to classify the investment at fair value through profit or loss instead. This election would
be irrevocable. See IFRS 9.4.1.5 1
APPLICATION
4
In this case, the investment does offer contractual cash flows that represent solely the return of principal plus i
on principal and thus the investment would be classified at fair value through profit or loss if:
• It was held for trading 1
Available 11.5
Max 6