FIFA Global Transfer Report 2021
FIFA Global Transfer Report 2021
TRANSFER
REPORT
2021
2
CONTENTS
FOREWORD 3
AMATEUR FOOTBALL 54
Overview 54
Player characteristics 55
Transfers by confederation 57
Transfers by association 58
Club characteristics 61
DEFINITIONS 77
METHODOLOGY 81
DISCLAIMER 82
CONTENTS
3
FOREWORD
In 2021, for the second consecutive year, the COVID-19 pandemic caused
considerable difficulties in competitions right across the globe. Football’s
dynamic growth in the years prior to the outbreak of the pandemic was
not completely disrupted, however. Last year, 4,544 clubs (the highest-ever
number and almost 400 more than in 2019) completed a total of 18,068
international transfers in men’s professional football, just a few transfers short
of the all-time high of 18,080 recorded in 2019.
FIFA’s carefully planned assistance for member associations, clubs and players
– such as financial support packages and amendments to various sets of
regulations – have helped the game to grow even stronger, even in such a
difficult period.
The FIFA Global Transfer Report 2021 offers a wide and detailed account as
well as a clear picture of international transfers across the world of football,
and we hope that you enjoy reading it.
Overview
For the second year in a row, the COVID-19 pandemic heavily affected
football as well as all other activities around the globe. Nevertheless, football
remained vibrant and dynamic, with player transfers remaining an important
part of the game in practically every country in the world.
18,080 18,068
17,190
16,550
15,662
2020
4,544
clubs, more than
4,216 3,974
3,796
ever before,
involved in
transfers in 2021
2,573
2,502
2,274
2,176
2,286 2,361
1,561 1,558
1,380
539 587 676
357 536 328
613
481
257
68 44 115
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
4,544
4,145 4,162
3,945
3,803
187
185
183
180 179
Most transfers (52.6%) were concluded well before (at least two to four
weeks) the end of the registration period of the engaging association. Many
transfers, mostly those of out-of-contract players, took place outside the
designated transfer windows.
Figure 5: Transfers by time before the end of the registration period (2021)
6,053
3,453
1,959 1,875
1,652 1,682
1,394
Outside the Deadline 1-3 days 4-7 days 1-2 weeks >2-4 >4 weeks
registration day before before before weeks before
period before
TRANSFER TYPES
Permanent club-to-club transfers (which attract most of the public and media
attention) represented a relatively small proportion (11.4%) of all transfer
activity in 2021 – significantly below the peak of 13.0% in 2017. Transfers of
out-of-contract players were by far the most common activity, with 66.8%,
an increase of more than four percentage points compared to 2020. All other
types of transfers were less frequent in 2021 compared to 2020.
60% 62.7%
50%
40%
30%
20%
16.1%
13.5% 14.2%
13.6% 13.4% 13.6% 13.1% 13.1%
12.9%
10.6% 11.6%
10.4% 12.9% 11.4%
10% 10.7% 11.7% 13.0% 12.5%
9.7% 8.7%
8.3% 8.8% 7.8% 8.4% 8.4% 8.6% 8.6%
0%
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
MEN’S PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL
8
3.6%
19.0% 43.5%
Out-of-contract reason
Contract expired
Mutually agreed
termination
No previous contract
Unilateral termination
33.9%
TRANSFER FEES
7.35bn
4.86bn
spent on transfer
6.94bn
fees
6.29bn
5.63bn
4.86bn
2,230 (12.3%)
MEN’S PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL
15,838 (87.7%)
10
Among the international transfers that involved a fee, the vast majority
59.0%
(59.0%) were for less than USD 500,000. Those with fees exceeding
USD 5 million represented just less than 10% of transfers with fees, or 1.2%
of all international transfers.
of all transfers
Figure 10: Transfers by size of transfer fee in USD (2021)
with fees involved
1,316 a fee of less than
USD 500k
426
266
103 119
The median transfer fee also fell sharply in 2021, dropping to USD 300,000
and thus back to the levels of 2011.
Figure 11: Number of transfers with fees and median transfer fee in USD by
year
2,688
MEN’S PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL
2,352 2,375
2,277 2,230
410.3k
379.4k
375.4k
330.4k
300.0k
In 2021, the size of the transfer fee did not appear to have a strong influence
on the timing of the transfer as most were completed well before the end of
the registration period, irrespective of the transfer fee involved.
Figure 12: Time before the end of the registration period by size of transfer
fee (2021)
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Outside the Deadline 1-3 4-7 1-2 >2-4 >4 weeks
registration day days days weeks weeks before
period before before before before
SELL-ON FEES
Agreements between clubs regarding potential benefits for the releasing club
in any future transfer between the engaging club and a third club have almost
become standard practice in transfers with fees, as more than half of such
transfers in 2021 (53.7%) included such a clause. A sell-on fee was included
in just 2.8% of transfers without a transfer fee, however.
Figure 13: Percentage of transfers with sell-on fees by transfer fee (2021)
53.7%
of all transfers
Transfers with transfer fees Transfers without transfer fees
with fees also
46.3% 2.8%
included a sell-on
clause
53.7% 97.2%
Once again, the likelihood of a sell-on fee being included in a transfer contract
was more than three times greater for a player under the age of 18 than for
a player between 24 and 29 years of age.
Figure 14: Percentage of transfers with sell-on fee by player age (2021)
30.1%
MEN’S PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL
13.7%
7.0%
0.9%
0.0%
<18 years 18-23 24-29 30-35 >35
old years old years old years old years old
Player age
13
While sell-on fees were in the range of 0-20% for approximately two thirds
of all such transfers, there was also a significant number of transfers (534
of 1,639) in which the sell-on fee was above 20%. In 16 of these cases, the
sell-on fee was actually over 50%.
455
293
139
86
16
>0% -10% >10% -20% >20%-30% >30% - 40% >40% -50% >50%
Sell-on fee
TRAINING REWARDS
While releasing clubs can be financially rewarded for training and releasing a
player, there may also be other clubs that trained the player in his formative
years but are not part of the transfer. This scenario is covered by the FIFA
Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players (RSTP), which stipulate
that specific percentages of the transfer fee shall be paid to the clubs that
contributed to the player’s football education and training between the USD
ages of 12 and 23 (solidarity contribution). Under the same regulations,
training compensation is a financial reimbursement for a player’s training
club(s) in cases when the player signs his first contract with a professional
42.8m
total solidarity
club and in cases when a player is involved in his first international transfer
while below the age of 23. Clubs that have such an entitlement can claim contribution
the payment through the FIFA dispute resolution system. In 2021, the declared in 2021
solidarity contribution calculated by engaging clubs paying a transfer fee
was USD 42.8 million for 340 international transfers, while 1,371 solidarity
contribution claims were submitted to FIFA. It should also be noted that
claims could be submitted by more than one club in a transfer (depending on
the number of clubs with which a player was registered) and that there could
be disagreements regarding the calculated amount due by the engaging club.
Training compensation was declared in 91 international transfers for a total
amount of USD 14.2 million, and within the same period, there were 566
new claims for training compensation. FIFA’s transfer system reforms foresee
the establishment and operation of a clearing house that will simplify and
expedite the process even further, eliminating the time between the actual
transfer and the payment of solidarity contribution or training compensation.
Figure 16 shows the top ten international player transfers by total transfer
fee in 2021. These ten transfers alone generated almost 15% of the total
spending on transfer fees in 2021. Similarly, of the 2,217 transfers with fees,
the top 100 were responsible for more than 50% of all transfer fees in 2021.
Player
Romelu
From
Internazionale
To
Chelsea F.C.
>50%
of all transfer fees
LUKAKU Milano SPA (Italy) (England)
spent on the top
Borussia
Jadon
Dortmund
Manchester United 100 transfers
SANCHO F.C. (England)
(Germany)
Achraf Internazionale Paris St Germain
HAKIMI Milano SPA (Italy) F.C. (France)
Tottenham Hotspur
Bryan GIL Sevilla F.C. (Spain)
F.C. (England)
MEN’S PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL
16
Player characteristics
PLAYER AGE
2,701
166 157
<18 years 18-23 years 24-29 years 30-35 years >35 years
old old old old old
Figure 18 shows a similar trend for spending on transfer fees, which was
particularly focused on players aged 18 to 23, followed by those between 24
and 29.
Figure 18: Spending on transfer fees in USD by player age (2021) MEN’S PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL
2,827.8m
1,802.2m
161.6m
45.3m 27.7m
<18 years 18-23 years 24-29 years 30-35 years >35 years
old old old old old
17
While players over the age of 23 are more likely to be out of contract when
they are transferred (more than two thirds of all transfers in this age category),
players younger than 24 are more than twice as likely to be transferred on
loan.
53.3% 6.6%
11.5%
7.9%
15.2%
8.5%
20.0% 77.0%
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS
Players below the age of 18 are most likely to receive a two- or three-year
contract, whereas practically all other age groups have a high chance of
receiving an employment contract of 12 months or less.
20%
0%
>0-6 >6-12 >1-2 years >2-3 years >3-4 years >4 years
months months
Contract duration
18
60%
Percentage of contracts
40%
20%
0%
>0-6 >6-12 >1-2 years >2-3 years >3-4 years >4 years
months months
Contract duration
The duration of a player’s contract is also related to the transfer fee that the
engaging club is willing to pay. Some 60% of transfers without a fee (NB.
87.7% of transfers do not involve a fee) come with an employment contract
of one year or less. Another 20% of players involved in these transfers sign
a contract of up to two years. The likelihood of a contract longer than four
years is close to minimal, which is quite similar for transfers involving fees of
less than USD 0.5 million. The picture is reversed, however, when the transfer
fee is above USD 1 million.
Figure 22: Distribution of contract duration by total transfer fee in USD (2021)
60%
Percentage of contracts
40%
20%
0%
>0-6 >6-12 >1-2 years >2-3 years >3-4 years >4 years
months months
Contract duration
19
NATIONALITY
$TC\KNKCP 1,749
Argentinian 896
$TKVKUJ 837
French 772
MEN’S PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL
Colombian 653
Nigerian 624
Spanish 537
)JCPCKCP 456
Serbian 446
Dutch 408
20
Figure 25: Number of transfers (2012-2021) for 2021’s top five nationalities
by number of transfers
$TC\KNKCP Colombian
2,000
1,500
Number of transfers
1,000
500
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
In 2021, for the first time, the list of top ten nationalities in terms of the total
spending on transfer fees was not headed by Brazilian but by French players,
with a total of USD 643.6 million.
Figure 27: Top ten player nationalities by total spending on transfer fees in
USD (2021)
French 643.6m
468.4m
USD
$TC\KNKCP
643.6m
Spanish 307.2m
Argentinian 292.6m
spent on transfers
of French players
$TKVKUJ 286.5m
Dutch 258.7m
$GNIKCP 245.9m
Portuguese 188.8m
Croatian 146.3m
Danish 136.9m
In 2021, the spending on Brazilian players, which has been decreasing since
2018, fell for the third year in a row. After a severe dip in 2020, spending on
French players recovered but still remained below the levels of 2019.
Figure 28: Total spending on transfer fees (2012-2021) for 2021’s top five
nationalities by spending on transfer fees in USD
$TC\KNKCP French
1.0
bn
Total spending on transfer fees (USD)
0.8
MEN’S PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL
bn
0.6
bn
0.4
bn
0.2
bn
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
22
Transfers by confederation
There was relatively good balance between the number of incoming and
outgoing transfers for both European and South American clubs, but
only European clubs kept this balance between the transfer fees paid and
received, whereas clubs from CONMEBOL received more than seven times
more than they spent. Clubs from the AFC also spent more than 150% more
than they received. Clubs from Concacaf and the AFC spent and received
similar amounts, but Concacaf had significantly fewer incoming and outgoing
transfers.
8,439
transfers between
Figure 29: Transfers and transfer fees, by confederation (2021) clubs within UEFA
Outgoing transfers +PEQOKPIVTCPUHGTU Confederation Receipts from transfer fees Spending on transfer fees
(USD) (USD)
13 7 OFC 0 0
Engaging confederation
Transfers by association
Once again, Brazil was the association with the highest number of incoming
transfers and the second-highest number of outgoing transfers, topped only
by the number of outgoing transfers from England. Although five African
nationalities (Cameroonian, Ivorian, Ghanaian, Nigerian and Senegalese)
appeared in the top 25 player nationalities, there were no African member
associations in the top 25 engaging associations in 2021, and only Nigeria
was among the top 25 releasing associations. The numbers for transfers and
transfer fees for all member associations can be found in the annexe starting
784
incoming transfers
on page 62.
to Brazil
Figure 31: Top 25 associations by number of incoming transfers (2021)
$TC\KN 784
Portugal 745
MEN’S PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL
Spain 581
England 563
)GTOCP[ 448
+VCN[ 406
France 405
Turkey 402
)TGGEG 344
Argentina 338
24
885
outgoing transfers
from England
England 885
$TC\KN 820
Portugal 707
Spain 686
France 570
)GTOCP[ 476
MEN’S PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL
+VCN[ 457
Argentina 449
Colombia 405
$GNIKWO 371
25
From To Transfers
Brazil Portugal 274
Portugal Brazil 200
Germany Austria 59
Spain Andorra 57
Spain Portugal 56
France Belgium 54
Belgium France 54
England Spain 54
Austria Germany 53
Germany Turkey 53
The top ten changes drastically when considering the spending on transfer
fees, however, with European member associations occupying almost all of
the positions except number 7 (USA). In 2021, the top 25 also included three
member associations from the Arabian Peninsula (Saudi Arabia, United Arab
Emirates and Qatar) as well as China PR and Japan. In 2021, English clubs paid
transfer fees totalling USD 1,386.2 million, predominantly for players from
clubs within Europe.
Figure 37: Top ten associations by spending on transfer fees in USD (2021)
England 1,386.2m
+VCN[ 667.7m
USD
1.39bn
France 511.8m
)GTOCP[ 451.9m
spent by English
Spain 347.8m clubs
$GNIKWO 179.9m
USA 159.9m
Russia 131.2m
Turkey 107.2m
Portugal 100.2m
Figure 38: Top 25 associations by receipts from transfer fees in USD (2021)
The English FA, whose clubs received a total of USD 548.8 million, topped
the list ahead of the French FA in second, with Italy in third and Germany in
fourth. The difference between these four associations’ figures was relatively
small, however, with England and Germany just USD 25.8 million apart.
Figure 39: Top ten associations by receipts from transfer fees in USD (2021)
USD
England 548.8m 548.8m
received by
France 543.3m
English clubs
+VCN[ 540.4m
)GTOCP[ 523.0m
Spain 342.4m
$TC\KN 293.2m
Netherlands 233.5m
$GNIKWO 210.8m
Portugal 204.4m
Argentina 154.8m
Figure 40: Top ten transfer streams by total transfer fees in USD (2021)
The scatter plot in Figure 41 shows how clubs from different member
associations performed in respect of transfer fees. The majority of associations
can be found above the diagonal line, which means that their clubs received
more for outgoing transfers than they spent on incoming transfers.
Kuwait Libya
Canada
$CJTCKP
Moldova
$QVUYCPC
10k Jordan +PFKC
+PFQPGUKC
100
Club characteristics
The vast majority (3,101) of the 4,544 clubs involved in transfers in 2021 only
engaged players. Nevertheless, a significant number of clubs (1,233) not only
engaged new players but also released players, whereas only very few clubs
completed at least one outgoing transfer but no incoming transfers at all.
Most clubs made more than just one international transfer, with a significant
number transferring more than six players in 2021.
$QVJGPICIKPI
and releasing
1,233 (27.1%)
4,544
Clubs involved
2,072
1,191
761
628 606
275
142
55 35 12
1 transfer 2-5 transfers 6-10 transfers 11-20 transfers >20 transfers
30
Figure 44: Number of clubs by total value of their international transfer fees
in USD (2021)
839
clubs spent money
Clubs by total spending on transfer fees on international
343
Clubs by total receipts from transfer fees
transfers
289
258
222
211
184
86
64
51 44
29
21
>0 - 10k >10k - 100k >100k - 1m >1m - 10m >10m - 50m >50m
Club's total transfer fees (USD)
The number of clubs with total spending on or receipts from transfer fees
of at least USD 1 million fell in 2021 compared to previous years. However,
the number of clubs with transfer fees of less than USD 1 million increased
compared to 2020 but still remained below 2019 levels.
Figure 45: Number of clubs by spending on and receipts from transfer fees
in USD over the years
672
MEN’S PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL
497 507
Clubs spending
less than 1m
416 417
401
377 367
Clubs receiving
at least 1m
370
332 345 346 Clubs spending
318 at least 1m
When comparing individual clubs’ spending on and receipts from transfer fees,
58.4%
the majority of clubs (58.4%) spent less on transfer fees than they received.
This tendency was particularly strong in CAF and CONMEBOL, where 80.5%
and 84.7% respectively spent less than they received.
of clubs with
Figure 46: Distribution of clubs by spending on and receipts from transfer
fees in USD (2021); bubble size represents the number of incoming transfers
transfers against
payments received
more than they
Confederation AFC CAF Concacaf C10/'$1. UEFA
spent
100m
1m
Receipts from transfer fees (USD)
10k
100
0
0 1 100 10k 1m 100m
Spending on transfer fees (USD)
The following pages present the confederations’ top clubs in terms of their
spending on transfer fees and the number of outgoing transfers. Due to the
small number of transfers involving clubs from the OFC (seven incoming and
13 outgoing transfers in 2021), only clubs from UEFA, CONMEBOL, Concacaf,
the AFC and CAF are shown here.
Figure 47: Top 20 clubs from UEFA by spending on transfer fees (2021)
Club
Manchester United FC (England)
Chelsea FC (England)
RB Leipzig (Germany)
ROMA SPA (Italy)
Arsenal FC (England)
Tottenham Hotspur FC (England)
Paris St Germain FC (France)
Manchester City FC (England)
Bayer 04 Leverkusen (Germany)
MILAN SPA (Italy)
OLYMPIQUE DE MARSEILLE (France)
JUVENTUS SPA (Italy)
Atletico Madrid (Spain)
Norwich City FC (England)
Brighton and Hove Albion FC (England)
Villarreal FC (Spain)
AS Monaco FC (France)
Aston Villa FC (England)
Leicester City FC (England)
Liverpool FC (England)
Figure 48: Top ten clubs from CONMEBOL by spending on transfer fees
(2021)
MEN’S PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL
Club
Red Bull Bragantino - SP (Brazil)
Atlético Mineiro - MG (Brazil)
Grêmio - RS (Brazil)
Palmeiras - SP (Brazil)
São Paulo - SP (Brazil)
CA River Plate (Argentina)
Santos - SP (Brazil)
Athletico Paranaense - PR (Brazil)
Club Olimpia (Paraguay)
CA Boca Juniors (Argentina)
33
Figure 49: Top ten clubs from Concacaf by spending on transfer fees (2021)
Club
Atlanta United FC (USA)
FC Cincinnati (USA)
Austin FC (USA)
New York City FC (USA)
LA Galaxy (USA)
Whitecaps FC (Canada)
New York Red Bulls (USA)
Nashville SC (USA)
Chicago Fire FC (USA)
Orlando City SC (USA)
Figure 50: Top ten clubs from the AFC by spending on transfer fees (2021)
Club
Al Hilal SFC (Saudi Arabia)
Al Ittihad (Saudi Arabia)
Al Duhail SC (Qatar)
Shabab Al Ahli Dubai (United Arab Emirates)
Shandong Taishan FC (China PR)
MEN’S PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL
Figure 51: Top ten clubs from CAF by spending on transfer fees (2021)
Club
Esperance Sp. De Tunis (Tunisia)
Pyramids FC (Egypt)
Ahly Tripoli (Libya)
Mamelodi Sundowns FC (South Africa)
RS Berkane (Morocco)
USM Alger (Algeria)
Al Hilal Khartoum (Sudan)
Coca Cola Club (Egypt)
Simba SC (Tanzania)
Wydad Athletic Club (Morocco)
In order to best reflect the training performance of releasing clubs, these lists
not only include outgoing transfers with a transfer agreement between the
releasing and the engaging club but also transfers involving players out of
contract. Such transfers typically do not actively involve the releasing club, but
they are nevertheless testament to the releasing club’s success in developing
football talent.
Figure 52: Top ten clubs from UEFA by number of outgoing transfers (2021)
Figure 53: Top ten clubs from CONMEBOL by number of outgoing transfers
(2021)
Figure 54: Top ten clubs from Concacaf by number of outgoing transfers
(2021)
Figure 55: Top ten clubs from the AFC by number of outgoing transfers
(2021)
Figure 56: Top ten clubs from CAF by number of outgoing transfers (2021)
Overview
Women’s professional football is continuing to go from strength to strength.
As the registration of international transfers in women’s professional football
now follows the same procedure as the men’s game, i.e. through FIFA TMS,
consistent growth is being witnessed. Although numbers are significantly
smaller and the number of transfers and fees are considerably lower in
comparison to the equivalent figures in men’s professional football, there is
112
FIFA member
still a clear upwards trend in the women’s game, even during the time of the
COVID-19 pandemic. It is probably safe to say that if the pandemic had not associations
happened, an even sharper rise in the number of transfers and a much higher involved in
increase in transfer fees would have been witnessed. international
Figure 57: Member associations engaging and/or releasing players around
transfers in
the world (2021); bubble size represents the number of completed transfers women’s
professional
football
1,033
1,304
international
838
transfers in 2021
696 –
26.2% more than
in 2020
414
347
275
220
112
99
88
74
In 2021, the peak in transfer activity in July and August was particularly
pronounced compared to previous years, with 43.0% of all transfers taking
place in these two months.
2020
326
235
184 188
159
149
166 102
75 118 109 78
91 46 40 37
73 34
26 38 25
5 14 19
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
As in men’s football, clubs also tend to complete transfers well before the
end of the registration period in the women’s game, with more than 60%
of transfers concluded with at least two weeks to spare. This demonstrates
well-planned squad management and a timely reaction to the clubs’ needs.
Figure 61: Transfers by time before the end of the registration period (2021)
474
137
115
103
74 78
Outside the Deadline 1-3 days 4-7 days 1-2 weeks >2-4 >4 weeks
registration day before before before weeks before
period before
TRANSFER TYPES
4.4%
3.1%
87.3%
of all transfers
5.1% involved
out-of-contract
Transfer type
players
Out of contract
Permanent
Loan
87.3%
Some 43.1% of the 1,139 players who transferred out of contract did not
have a previous professional football contract at all, i.e. they were playing as
amateurs for their previous clubs. Another 39.9% of these players moved
internationally after the expiry of their previous contract. In 16.4% of
out-of-contract transfers, the player and her previous club mutually agreed to
terminate the contract, whereas contracts were unilaterally terminated in only
0.6% of such transfers. These figures do not represent a significant change
compared to 2020.
Figure 63: Distribution of the reasons why players moved out of contract
WOMEN’S PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL
(2021)
0.6%
16.4% 43.1%
Out-of-contract reason
No previous contract
Contract expired
Mutually agreed
termination
Unilateral termination
39.9%
41
TRANSFER FEES
spent on transfer
fees
1.2m
–
72.8% more than
in 2020
0.7m
0.6m
58
WOMEN’S PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL
36
4.4%
31
22 3.7%
3.5%
3.2%
Figure 66 shows the five transfers that generated the highest transfer fees
in 2021. These five alone accounted for almost 60% of the total spending
in 2021.
Player From To
Hanna FC Rosengård Everton Ladies
BENNISON (Sweden) (England)
Arsenal Women FC VfL Wolfsburg
Jill ROORD
(England) (Germany)
Paris St Germain FC
Alana COOK OL Reign (USA)
(France)
Damaris Everton Ladies OLYMPIQUE
EGURROLA (England) LYONNAIS (France)
OLYMPIQUE Arsenal Women FC
Nikita PARRIS
LYONNAIS (France) (England)
Player characteristics
PLAYER AGE
USD
In 2021, the vast majority of players (88.7%) transferred were between the
ages of 18 and 29, with the 18-23 and 24-29 age groups almost equally well
represented. Players in their 30s represented just over 10%, and in only 0.5%
1.3m
spent on transfers
of all transfers was the player younger than 18. This was also reflected in the
breakdown of transfer fees paid per age category. of players aged
24 to 29
Figure 67: Number of transfers by player age (2021)
580 576
132
6 10
<18 years 18-23 years 24-29 years 30-35 years >35 years
old old old old old
1.3m
<0.1m
0.0m 0.0m
<18 years 18-23 years 24-29 years 30-35 years >35 years
old old old old old
44
1.9%
3.8% 4.2%
5.5% 4.9%
4.9%
88.9% 86.1%
Most transfers of professional female players in 2021 still came with contracts
with a duration of up to one year (62.7%), but the proportion of contracts
with longer durations increased from 32.2% in 2020 to 37.3%.
60%
43.5%
Percentage of contracts
27.2%
20%
19.2%
6.8%
2.8%
0.5%
0%
>0-6 >6-12 >1-2 >2-3 >3-4 >4 years
months months years years years
Contract duration
45
NATIONALITY
Once again, the USA dominated the list of top ten nationalities by the number
of transfers in 2021, with 17.9% of all transfers. Brazilian players were in
second place, followed by British players in third.
USA 234
$TC\KNKCP 69
$TKVKUJ 48
WOMEN’S PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL
Nigerian 41
Australian 39
Swedish 36
Canadian 35
Colombian 32
Danish 30
)GTOCP 30
+EGNCPFKE 30
46
Figure 73: Number of transfers (2018-2021) for 2021’s top five nationalities
by number of transfers
200
Number of transfers
150
100
50
Player nationality
$TC\KNKCP $TKVKUJ Canadian Swedish USA
Transfers by confederation
Clubs from UEFA member associations were once again the most active in
terms of engaging and releasing players in international transfers in 2021.
Three more European associations were involved in international transfers in
2021 than in 2020, meaning that 50 of UEFA’s 55 member associations were
involved. The number of European clubs actively involved in international
transfers rose from 244 in 2020 to 265 in 2021. CONMEBOL remained the
only confederation that saw all of its member associations participate, with
31 different clubs involved.
642
transfers between
Figure 74: Transfers and transfer fees, by confederation (2021) clubs within UEFA
Outgoing transfers +PEQOKPIVTCPUHGTU Confederation Receipts from transfer fees Spending on transfer fees
75& 75&
4 8 OFC 0 0
As in previous years, most transfer activity in 2021 took place within UEFA,
with 642 transfers accounting for just under 50% of all transfers and 71.4%
of the total transfer fees paid in 2021. This was followed by transfers of players
moving from a Concacaf member association to a UEFA one (132 transfers),
and by those going in the opposite direction (92).
Engaging confederation
WOMEN’S PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL
13 6 6 8 40
Releasing confederation
AFC -
- - - - 22.2k
10 83 47
CAF - - -
- - 1.0k
11 4 25 6 132
Concacaf -
5.0k - 10.0k - 25.0k
5 8 35 58
CONMEBOL - -
- 98.0k - 11.8k
2 2
OFC - - - -
- -
28 14 92 26 642
UEFA -
60.3k - 378.5k - 1,525.4k
48
Transfers by association
Sweden was at the top of the list of associations with the most incoming
transfers in 2021 with 88 transfers, followed by Spain and the USA, each
with 87. For the first time ever, a CAF member association made the top ten,
with Morocco in eighth place. Detailed numbers for all member association
transfers can be found in the annexe starting on page 68.
Sweden 88
Spain 87
USA 87
WOMEN’S PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL
Portugal 61
France 60
)GTOCP[ 57
'PINCPF 56
Morocco 54
+EGNCPF 50
+UTCGN 45
49
For outgoing transfers, the top ten was less balanced, with the USA leading
the way with a total of 136 followed by Spain on 82. Although the most
frequent transfer stream was that of players moving from Brazil to Portugal,
the leading role of the US Soccer Federation in women’s professional football
was underscored by its involvement in seven out of the top ten transfer
streams in 2021.
USA 136
Spain 82
Sweden 72
WOMEN’S PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL
+VCN[ 62
France 51
$TC\KN 47
'PINCPF 47
)GTOCP[ 45
+EGNCPF 44
Portugal 38
50
From To Transfers
Brazil Portugal 19
USA Mexico 17
Sweden
England
USA
USA
16
15
72
clubs from 26
France USA 15 associations
USA Israel 14 involved in
transfers with fees
USA Iceland 12
Italy Spain 12
Italy Switzerland 11
USA Sweden 11
Figure 81: Associations with clubs engaging and/or releasing players against
transfer fees (2021)
Club characteristics
1PN[TGNGCUKPI
$QVJGPICIKPI
and releasing
414
Clubs involved
Only engaging
The majority of the 400 clubs that engaged players (68.8%) completed at
least two (and up to 19) incoming transfers in 2021, demonstrating their
increasing need for elite players. Nevertheless, a high number of clubs (125)
completed just one transfer in 2021.
211
Clubs by incoming transfers
125
57
45
25
2 7
Figure 84: Number of clubs by total value of their international transfer fees
in USD (2021)
24
21
16
14
6
5
Top clubs
AMATEUR FOOTBALL
Overview
2021 was the first full year in which international transfers of amateur players
had to be processed through FIFA TMS, as this was made mandatory on
1 July 2020. With 201 associations and more than 200 different nationalities
involved, international transfers of amateur players surpassed even the
dimensions recorded in the world of professional football. 35,367
international
Figure 87: Member associations engaging and/or releasing players around
the world (2021); bubble size represents the number of completed transfers transfers of
amateur players
completed in 2021
17,571
clubs
involved
201
In 2021, 17,571 clubs completed a total of 35,367 international transfers of
amateur players – over 80% more than in professional football. A total of
90.8% of amateur transfers involved male players.
FIFA member
associations
involved
AMATEUR FOOTBALL
55
Player characteristics
PLAYER AGE
Players between 18 and 23 were the best represented age group, with
44.2% of all transfers falling into this category. Players older than 35 were
only involved in 3.5% of all amateur transfers.
15,648
9,299
5,651
3,514
1,255
<18 years 18-23 years 24-29 years 30-35 years >35 years
old old old old old
AMATEUR FOOTBALL
56
NATIONALITY
Amateur players from France were involved in the most international transfers
in 2021 (3,318), followed by British players in second and Italians in third.
With the exception of the USA and Argentina, the top ten nationalities were
all European. There were no African nationalities in the top 25 and only one
3,318
Asian (Japanese).
French 3,318
British 2,200
Italian 1,925
Spanish 1,503
German 1,343
USA 1,294
Croatian 1,234
Argentinian 1,140
AMATEUR FOOTBALL
Polish 1,015
Ukrainian 964
57
Transfers by confederation
A total of 84.0% of all amateur players who moved across borders in 2021
went to play for a club in Europe, and most of them also moved from another
European association. Overall, players moved from one confederation to
another in 25.5% of all transfers, whereas most moved between associations
within the same confederation.
Engaging confederation
Transfers by association
Germany led the way in both the number of incoming and outgoing transfers
of amateurs in 2021. There was only one non-European representative in
each top ten, namely the USA in both instances.
5,122
Figure 93: Top 25 associations by number of incoming transfers (2021)
Germany 5,122
Spain 3,360
France 2,064
Austria 1,869
Italy 1,858
England 1,551
Switzerland 1,228
USA 1,197
AMATEUR FOOTBALL
Belgium 1,140
Poland 947
59
2,651
outgoing transfers
from Germany
Germany 2,651
France 2,532
England 1,853
Spain 1,646
Italy 1,616
USA 1,514
Austria 1,131
Poland 966
Croatia 879
Belgium 878
AMATEUR FOOTBALL
60
From To Transfers
Poland Germany 529
France Belgium 516
France Switzerland 501
Germany Austria 436
Croatia Germany 397
France Luxembourg 362
USA Spain 347
France Germany 318
Belgium France 314
Italy Germany 299
AMATEUR FOOTBALL
61
Club characteristics
10,960
5,719
641
196 55
1 transfer 2-5 transfers 6-10 transfers 11-20 transfers >20 transfers
AMATEUR FOOTBALL
62
Figure 99: Number of incoming and outgoing transfers, clubs involved and total spending and receipts by
association, men’s professional football (2021)
Spending Receipts
Incoming Outgoing Engaging Releasing
Association transfers transfers clubs clubs
on fees from fees
(USD) (USD)
Albania (UEFA) 172 118 23 7 n/a n/a
Algeria (CAF) 33 59 15 4 1.0m n/a
Andorra (UEFA) 100 13 10 1 n/a n/a
Angola (CAF) 17 19 6 2 n/a n/a
Antigua and Barbuda
0 1 0 0 n/a n/a
(Concacaf)
Argentina (CONMEBOL) 338 449 102 43 14.2m 154.8m
Armenia (UEFA) 134 101 13 3 .7m n/a
Australia (AFC) 89 79 21 10 n/a 1.1m
Austria (UEFA) 182 182 31 16 57.8m 110.2m
Azerbaijan (UEFA) 68 59 12 3 .7m n/a
Bahamas (Concacaf) 0 1 0 0 n/a n/a
Bahrain (AFC) 78 46 20 3 n/a n/a
Bangladesh (AFC) 44 20 13 0 n/a n/a
Belarus (UEFA) 133 145 25 10 3.6m 1.2m
Belgium (UEFA) 330 370 36 23 179.9m 210.8m
Belize (Concacaf) 7 14 2 0 n/a n/a
Benin (CAF) 119 35 34 2 n/a n/a
Bhutan (AFC) 0 4 0 0 n/a n/a
ANNEXE: ASSOCIATION OVERVIEW
Spending Receipts
Incoming Outgoing Engaging Releasing
Association transfers transfers clubs clubs
on fees from fees
(USD) (USD)
Cabo Verde (CAF) 0 2 0 0 n/a n/a
Cambodia (AFC) 36 7 12 0 n/a n/a
Cameroon (CAF) 36 152 16 17 n/a 2.1m
Canada (Concacaf) 105 84 11 5 17.5m n/a
Central African Republic (CAF) 0 2 0 1 n/a n/a
Chad (CAF) 0 4 0 0 n/a n/a
Chile (CONMEBOL) 135 142 40 14 1.8m 7.9m
China PR (AFC) 85 88 32 8 38.7m n/a
Chinese Taipei (AFC) 14 3 5 0 n/a n/a
Colombia (CONMEBOL) 172 405 34 18 1.1m 37.7m
Comoros (CAF) 0 1 0 0 n/a n/a
Congo (CAF) 2 24 1 4 n/a n/a
Congo DR (CAF) 39 69 10 4 n/a 1.1m
Costa Rica (Concacaf) 94 53 27 7 n/a 2.5m
Côte d'Ivoire (CAF) 56 148 17 18 n/a 2.0m
Croatia (UEFA) 211 259 21 11 14.4m 74.2m
Cuba (Concacaf) 0 7 0 0 n/a n/a
Cyprus (UEFA) 266 180 38 7 11.5m 5.5m
Czech Republic (UEFA) 141 175 31 25 12.6m 30.6m
Denmark (UEFA) 205 251 28 22 43.4m 131.0m
Djibouti (CAF) 24 6 10 0 n/a n/a
Dominica (Concacaf) 0 1 0 0 n/a n/a
Dominican Republic
78 28 10 0 n/a n/a
(Concacaf)
Ecuador (CONMEBOL) 218 131 81 8 n/a 15.4m
Egypt (CAF) 74 99 38 9 6.3m 4.9m
El Salvador (Concacaf) 74 43 24 1 n/a n/a
ANNEXE: ASSOCIATION OVERVIEW
Spending Receipts
Incoming Outgoing Engaging Releasing
Association transfers transfers clubs clubs
on fees from fees
(USD) (USD)
Finland (UEFA) 136 118 28 10 n/a 3.1m
France (UEFA) 405 570 108 43 511.8m 543.3m
Gabon (CAF) 1 10 1 0 n/a n/a
Gambia (CAF) 7 48 2 10 n/a 1.5m
Georgia (UEFA) 119 87 27 3 n/a n/a
Germany (UEFA) 448 476 135 38 451.9m 523.0m
Ghana (CAF) 109 190 41 38 .2m 6.0m
Gibraltar (UEFA) 30 20 6 1 n/a n/a
Greece (UEFA) 344 247 43 12 33.1m 60.3m
Guam (AFC) 0 1 0 0 n/a n/a
Guatemala (Concacaf) 100 57 28 1 n/a n/a
Guinea (CAF) 17 64 6 6 n/a .3m
Guinea-Bissau (CAF) 0 9 0 2 n/a n/a
Guyana (Concacaf) 0 4 0 0 n/a n/a
Haiti (Concacaf) 0 10 0 1 n/a n/a
Honduras (Concacaf) 93 56 26 2 n/a n/a
Hong Kong (AFC) 12 25 6 2 n/a n/a
Hungary (UEFA) 141 128 30 15 16.5m 11.9m
Iceland (UEFA) 84 50 26 13 n/a 3.7m
India (AFC) 100 96 34 3 n/a n/a
Indonesia (AFC) 67 44 21 8 n/a n/a
Iran (AFC) 22 36 11 2 n/a n/a
Iraq (AFC) 124 58 30 0 n/a n/a
Israel (UEFA) 112 104 30 11 4.9m 15.4m
Italy (UEFA) 406 457 66 42 667.7m 540.4m
Jamaica (Concacaf) 19 24 8 10 n/a .1m
ANNEXE: ASSOCIATION OVERVIEW
Spending Receipts
Incoming Outgoing Engaging Releasing
Association transfers transfers clubs clubs
on fees from fees
(USD) (USD)
Laos (AFC) 3 9 1 0 n/a n/a
Latvia (UEFA) 117 149 13 10 1.5m 4.3m
Lebanon (AFC) 22 32 8 2 n/a n/a
Lesotho (CAF) 2 4 2 0 n/a n/a
Liberia (CAF) 3 10 2 1 n/a n/a
Libya (CAF) 151 39 24 1 1.2m n/a
Lithuania (UEFA) 78 51 12 2 n/a n/a
Luxembourg (UEFA) 68 40 14 5 n/a .4m
Macau (AFC) 0 1 0 0 n/a n/a
Madagascar (CAF) 0 6 0 0 n/a n/a
Malawi (CAF) 4 4 3 2 n/a n/a
Malaysia (AFC) 75 53 16 1 n/a n/a
Maldives (AFC) 12 20 6 0 n/a n/a
Mali (CAF) 8 93 6 14 n/a 20.1m
Malta (UEFA) 168 90 42 3 n/a n/a
Mauritania (CAF) 24 35 6 2 n/a n/a
Mauritius (CAF) 10 5 7 0 n/a n/a
Mexico (Concacaf) 192 201 50 19 29.7m 14.1m
Moldova (UEFA) 78 83 12 4 1.4m n/a
Mongolia (AFC) 10 8 5 0 n/a n/a
Montenegro (UEFA) 65 51 17 3 n/a n/a
Morocco (CAF) 104 79 32 7 2.0m 9.1m
Mozambique (CAF) 9 17 6 2 n/a n/a
Myanmar (AFC) 0 16 0 0 n/a n/a
Namibia (CAF) 15 7 6 0 n/a n/a
Nepal (AFC) 32 4 10 0 n/a n/a
ANNEXE: ASSOCIATION OVERVIEW
Spending Receipts
Incoming Outgoing Engaging Releasing
Association transfers transfers clubs clubs
on fees from fees
(USD) (USD)
Palestine (AFC) 18 3 6 0 n/a n/a
Panama (Concacaf) 98 68 19 10 n/a n/a
Papua New Guinea (OFC) 0 1 0 0 n/a n/a
Paraguay (CONMEBOL) 147 151 29 12 6.1m 18.6m
Peru (CONMEBOL) 106 89 29 4 n/a 3.3m
Philippines (AFC) 18 7 5 0 n/a n/a
Poland (UEFA) 281 201 78 18 14.6m 31.3m
Portugal (UEFA) 745 707 131 34 100.2m 204.4m
Puerto Rico (Concacaf) 0 2 0 0 n/a n/a
Qatar (AFC) 54 57 17 1 21.4m n/a
Republic of Ireland (UEFA) 90 71 16 8 .1m 4.2m
Republic of North Macedonia
83 80 14 5 n/a 1.4m
(UEFA)
Romania (UEFA) 249 191 54 12 1.7m 38.6m
Russia (UEFA) 259 255 76 22 131.2m 91.0m
Rwanda (CAF) 68 36 15 2 n/a n/a
San Marino (UEFA) 0 3 0 0 n/a n/a
Saudi Arabia (AFC) 224 200 63 12 54.4m 2.7m
Scotland (UEFA) 242 183 44 13 27.5m 100.3m
Senegal (CAF) 70 82 19 15 n/a 3.4m
Serbia (UEFA) 223 242 39 13 3.7m 16.9m
Sierra Leone (CAF) 0 17 0 5 n/a n/a
Singapore (AFC) 30 12 7 0 n/a n/a
Slovakia (UEFA) 188 154 24 13 3.4m 20.6m
Slovenia (UEFA) 121 130 19 11 2.1m 9.3m
Somalia (CAF) 0 2 0 0 n/a n/a
South Africa (CAF) 72 73 24 5 1.2m n/a
ANNEXE: ASSOCIATION OVERVIEW
Spending Receipts
Incoming Outgoing Engaging Releasing
Association transfers transfers clubs clubs
on fees from fees
(USD) (USD)
Thailand (AFC) 74 74 28 2 n/a n/a
Timor-Leste (AFC) 1 0 1 0 n/a n/a
Togo (CAF) 90 73 20 3 n/a n/a
Trinidad and Tobago
1 8 1 2 n/a n/a
(Concacaf)
Tunisia (CAF) 123 147 25 11 1.3m 3.4m
Turkey (UEFA) 402 281 68 21 107.2m 33.9m
Turkmenistan (AFC) 9 0 2 0 n/a n/a
Turks and Caicos Islands
0 1 0 0 n/a n/a
(Concacaf)
Uganda (CAF) 30 30 18 1 n/a n/a
Ukraine (UEFA) 217 174 51 10 56.8m 12.9m
United Arab Emirates (AFC) 146 94 33 2 41.8m n/a
Uruguay (CONMEBOL) 163 217 29 16 n/a 21.5m
USA (Concacaf) 337 303 74 29 159.9m 59.9m
Uzbekistan (AFC) 83 77 27 3 n/a n/a
Venezuela (CONMEBOL) 123 93 29 14 n/a 1.0m
Vietnam (AFC) 20 17 7 0 n/a n/a
Wales (UEFA) 166 111 21 5 18.9m 9.4m
Yemen (AFC) 12 6 8 2 n/a n/a
Zambia (CAF) 51 55 20 4 n/a n/a
Zimbabwe (CAF) 18 24 9 3 n/a n/a
Figure 100: Number of incoming and outgoing transfers and clubs involved by association, women’s
professional football (2021)
Mali (CAF) 0 8 0 0
Malta (UEFA) 0 1 0 0
Mexico (Concacaf) 41 4 18 1
Moldova (UEFA) 0 1 0 0
Montenegro (UEFA) 0 1 0 0
Morocco (CAF) 54 0 23 0
Mozambique (CAF) 0 1 0 0
Myanmar (AFC) 0 1 0 0
Netherlands (UEFA) 14 18 7 1
New Zealand (OFC) 8 4 1 0
Nigeria (CAF) 6 28 2 1
Northern Ireland (UEFA) 0 1 0 0
70
Ukraine (UEFA) 26 12 5 0
Uruguay (CONMEBOL) 0 4 0 0
USA (Concacaf) 87 136 11 7
Uzbekistan (AFC) 6 0 2 0
Venezuela (CONMEBOL) 1 5 1 0
Wales (UEFA) 0 4 0 0
Zambia (CAF) 4 2 1 0
Zimbabwe (CAF) 0 2 0 0
71
Amateur football
Figure 101: Number of incoming and outgoing transfers and clubs involved by association, amateur football
(2021)
Afghanistan (AFC) 0 8 0
Albania (UEFA) 73 163 34
Algeria (CAF) 0 103 0
American Samoa (OFC) 1 0 1
Andorra (UEFA) 47 151 13
Angola (CAF) 1 10 1
Anguilla (Concacaf) 1 4 1
Antigua and Barbuda (Concacaf) 0 26 0
Argentina (CONMEBOL) 327 814 256
Armenia (UEFA) 19 55 4
Aruba (Concacaf) 3 8 3
Australia (AFC) 716 415 410
Austria (UEFA) 1,869 1,131 888
Azerbaijan (UEFA) 13 28 4
Bahrain (AFC) 1 7 1
Bangladesh (AFC) 0 4 0
Barbados (Concacaf) 0 5 0
Belarus (UEFA) 17 76 16
Belgium (UEFA) 1,140 878 424
Belize (Concacaf) 2 5 2
Benin (CAF) 49 17 22
Bermuda (Concacaf) 5 15 4
Bhutan (AFC) 0 3 0
ANNEXE: ASSOCIATION OVERVIEW
Cambodia (AFC) 0 15 0
Cameroon (CAF) 13 97 8
Canada (Concacaf) 412 323 118
Cayman Islands (Concacaf) 3 4 2
Central African Republic (CAF) 0 1 0
Chad (CAF) 0 3 0
Chile (CONMEBOL) 25 122 16
China PR (AFC) 0 19 0
Chinese Taipei (AFC) 3 10 1
Colombia (CONMEBOL) 305 511 176
Comoros (CAF) 32 54 16
Congo (CAF) 29 15 12
Congo DR (CAF) 16 36 12
Cook Islands (OFC) 3 8 2
Costa Rica (Concacaf) 52 37 17
Côte d'Ivoire (CAF) 9 76 4
Croatia (UEFA) 838 879 371
Cuba (Concacaf) 0 5 0
Curaçao (Concacaf) 8 26 6
Cyprus (UEFA) 177 163 90
Czech Republic (UEFA) 701 513 458
Denmark (UEFA) 433 283 205
Djibouti (CAF) 5 3 3
Dominica (Concacaf) 9 3 5
Dominican Republic (Concacaf) 2 31 1
Ecuador (CONMEBOL) 44 66 35
Egypt (CAF) 1 108 1
ANNEXE: ASSOCIATION OVERVIEW
El Salvador (Concacaf) 8 22 5
England (UEFA) 1,551 1,853 721
Equatorial Guinea (CAF) 28 14 4
Estonia (UEFA) 32 42 17
Eswatini (CAF) 3 8 2
Ethiopia (CAF) 0 3 0
Faroe Islands (UEFA) 49 93 13
Fiji (OFC) 32 5 10
Finland (UEFA) 176 136 96
73
Kazakhstan (UEFA) 0 45 0
Kenya (CAF) 1 34 1
Korea DPR (AFC) 0 1 0
Korea Republic (AFC) 164 82 117
Kosovo (UEFA) 53 164 21
Kuwait (AFC) 11 7 4
Kyrgyz Republic (AFC) 6 11 5
Laos (AFC) 1 9 1
Latvia (UEFA) 81 84 28
74
Lebanon (AFC) 0 26 0
Lesotho (CAF) 0 5 0
Liberia (CAF) 7 9 4
Libya (CAF) 49 1 20
Liechtenstein (UEFA) 0 1 0
Lithuania (UEFA) 94 74 29
Luxembourg (UEFA) 699 403 97
Macau (AFC) 0 1 0
Madagascar (CAF) 3 26 1
Malawi (CAF) 0 1 0
Malaysia (AFC) 0 26 0
Maldives (AFC) 14 5 4
Mali (CAF) 9 38 3
Malta (UEFA) 29 93 22
Mauritania (CAF) 18 16 7
Mauritius (CAF) 1 9 1
Mexico (Concacaf) 15 145 13
Moldova (UEFA) 20 92 15
Mongolia (AFC) 10 12 3
Montenegro (UEFA) 59 84 27
Morocco (CAF) 10 182 6
Mozambique (CAF) 0 7 0
Myanmar (AFC) 0 5 0
Namibia (CAF) 2 9 1
Nepal (AFC) 1 13 1
Netherlands (UEFA) 595 627 274
New Caledonia (OFC) 6 11 3
ANNEXE: ASSOCIATION OVERVIEW
Somalia (CAF) 0 1 0
South Africa (CAF) 44 39 33
Spain (UEFA) 3,360 1,646 1,482
Sri Lanka (AFC) 0 3 0
St Kitts and Nevis (Concacaf) 6 5 6
St Lucia (Concacaf) 18 4 8
St Vincent and the Grenadines
0 4 0
(Concacaf)
Sudan (CAF) 0 7 0
Suriname (Concacaf) 0 7 0
76
DEFINITIONS
Association
Club
The amount payable by the new club to the former club if certain conditions
are fulfilled, e.g. if the player scores ten goals or makes 20 first-team
appearances.
Confederation
The official document that allows the international transfer of the player’s
DEFINITIONS
Loan
Member association
The type of transfer conducted when a player signs for a new club when he/
she is not contractually bound to any former club and no transfer agreement
exists. There are four possible reasons for the player’s previous contract
termination: the contract with the former club has expired; the contract with
the former club was terminated unilaterally; the player mutually agreed an
early termination with his/her former club; the player was not under contract
with his/her former club, i.e. he/she was an amateur.
Permanent transfer
Professional player
A player who has a written contract with a club and is paid more for his/her
football activity than the expenses he/she effectively incurs (cf. RSTP art. 2
par. 2).
Receipts
Any fee paid in execution of a clause in the player‘s contract with his/her
former club providing for compensation for termination of the relevant
contract.
The instruction type entered when a player who was loaned to another club
returns to his/her club of origin after termination of the loan.
Global and binding rules concerning the status of players, their eligibility to
participate in organised football, and their transfer between clubs belonging
to different associations.
Sell-on fee
The percentage of a future transfer fee agreed between the two clubs
involved in a transfer. This means that if the new club transfers the player to a
third club, the former club is entitled to a percentage of the new transfer fee.
Solidarity contribution
Spending
Sum of fixed transfer fee, conditional transfer fee, release (buy-out) fee. In
DEFINITIONS
this report sell-on fees, solidarity contribution and training compensation are
covered separately.
80
Training compensation
Sum paid to the player’s training club(s): (1) when a player signs his first
contract as a professional, and (2) each time a professional is transferred until
the end of the season of his 23rd birthday. (cf. art. 20 of the RSTP).
Training rewards
Transfer fee
Transfer where at least one of fixed transfer fees, conditional transfer fees,
release (buyout) fees is greater than zero.
DEFINITIONS
81
METHODOLOGY
All transfer data provided in the report only concerns international transfers of football players within the
scope of 11-a-side football.
Transfer data has been analysed for all transfers completed between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2021.
All amounts are automatically converted into US dollars on the basis of conversion rates as of the day when
the transfer instruction is created in TMS. They are treated as upfront payments for calculation purposes,
notwithstanding any instalment plans that may be agreed by clubs.
METHODOLOGY
82
DISCLAIMER
The information in this report is based on individual transaction data provided directly by football clubs in
TMS. FIFA assumes no responsibility for the accuracy, completeness and reliability of the information provided
by the clubs. With regard to any technical references included in this report, please be advised that in the
event of any contradiction between this report and the actual text of the relevant regulations, the latter shall
always prevail. Equally, this report may not alter existing jurisprudence of the competent decision-making
bodies and is without prejudice to any decision that the said bodies might be called upon to pass in the
future.
Due to the nature of the TMS database, the presence of pending transfers, the potential cancellation
of transfers, and data corrections, numbers may differ from one report to another. In the event of any
contradiction between this report and other publications by FIFA, the most recent shall always prevail.
Any views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of FIFA.
The source of all data and information (unless explicitly stated otherwise) is:
FIFA
Zurich, Switzerland
Data protection
The data contained in TMS and in this review is covered by Swiss data protection law.
DISCLAIMER