0% found this document useful (0 votes)
59 views6 pages

Heat, Sep 2011

We explore two routes to Wave Function Engineering in elongated colloidal CdSe / CdS quantum dots. Varying the aspect ratio of the nanoparticle allows control over the electron-hole overlap. External electric fields manipulate the interaction between the delocalized electron and the localized hole.

Uploaded by

emediage
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
59 views6 pages

Heat, Sep 2011

We explore two routes to Wave Function Engineering in elongated colloidal CdSe / CdS quantum dots. Varying the aspect ratio of the nanoparticle allows control over the electron-hole overlap. External electric fields manipulate the interaction between the delocalized electron and the localized hole.

Uploaded by

emediage
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

NANO LETTERS

Wave Function Engineering in Elongated Semiconductor Nanocrystals with Heterogeneous Carrier Confinement
J. Muller, J. M. Lupton,* P. G. Lagoudakis, F. Schindler, R. Koeppe, 1 A. L. Rogach, and J. Feldmann
Photonics and Optoelectronics Group, Physics Department and CeNS, Ludwig-Maximilians-UniVersitat Munchen, Amalienstrasse 54, 80799 Munich, Germany

2005 Vol. 5, No. 10 2044-2049

D. V. Talapin and H. Weller


Institute of Physical Chemistry, UniVersity of Hamburg, Grindelallee 117, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
Received August 12, 2005

ABSTRACT
We explore two routes to wave function engineering in elongated colloidal CdSe/CdS quantum dots, providing deep insight into the intrinsic physics of these low-dimensional heterostructures. Varying the aspect ratio of the nanoparticle allows control over the electronhole overlap (radiative rate), and external electric fields manipulate the interaction between the delocalized electron and the localized hole. In agreement with theory, this leads to an exceptional size dependent quantum confined Stark effect with field induced intensity modulations, opening applications as electrically switchable single photon sources.

The manipulation of electronic wave function confinement in different dimensions, particularly in semiconductor nanostructures, often provides the framework for testing new physical phenomena.1-3 In contrast to well-defined quantum structures grown epitaxially,1-2 strongly reduced dimensionality comes naturally to synthetic systems such as colloids3 or -conjugated molecules.4 On the down side, these materials often suffer from the drawback of substantial size heterogeneity in the ensemble and considerable temporal fluctuations such as blinking and spectral diffusion on the single nanoparticle level.5 Here, we demonstrate that controlled manipulation of the single particle wave function in colloidal semiconductor nanocrystals (NCs) provides unprecedented access to the intrinsic physics of these lowdimensional systems. Wave function engineering has previously been investigated theoretically and experimentally in spherical NCs by alternate growth of different shell materials leading to localization of charge carriers at specific distances from the core.6,7 We show that the combination of heterostructure material growth and physical shape control opens the possibility of independently tuning the electron and hole wave function distribution inside a NC. By strongly confining the hole yet maintaining a highly deformable
* Corresponding author: tel, +49-89-2180-3356; fax, +49-89-21803441; e-mail, [email protected]. 10.1021/nl051596x CCC: $30.25 Published on Web 08/30/2005 2005 American Chemical Society

electron wave function, a new region of field effects can be probed. This provides a route to enhancing the electric field response through the quantum-confined Stark effect (QCSE)8-10 as well as aiding the development of a truly microscopic understanding of excited-state configurations. Accurate shape control and the elimination of heterogeneity and polydispersity averaging in single nanoparticle measurements allow direct comparison with theory, demonstrating that individual colloidal quantum dots (QDs) can provide highly versatile semiconductor test beds for quantum engineering while maintaining the appealing growth and processing properties of solution-based materials. We recently introduced a novel class of NCs consisting of two different materials grown with a strongly asymmetric shape.11,12 This heterostructure facilitates electron penetration into the elongated CdS shell whereas the hole is confined inside the spherical CdSe core, which is preferentially situated at one end of the wurtzite structure.11,12 The choice of synthetic conditions allows a direct control of the nanoparticle aspect ratio (AR), enabling a tuning between three- and two-dimensional confinement.11 Elongated NCs are thus interesting systems for studying manifestations of the interplay between carrier delocalization and photon emission such as radiative rates as well as the dependence on external electrostatic perturbations. In contrast to spherical

Figure 1. Engineering of the wave function overlap in CdSe/CdS nanocrystals by shape control. (a) Band diagram and calculated electronic wave functions (light gray, CdSe; dark gray, CdS). (b) Fluorescence decay of elongated NCs for two different aspect ratios (ARs): 4.0 (black) and 1.6 (gray). (c) Radiative recombination rate as a function of AR (black squares). The lines indicate the calculated squared electron-hole wave function overlap integral for three different conduction band offsets e.

QDs,5 our elongated NCs facilitate the electric field effect on the electronic wave function due to the increased delocalization volume and simultaneously reduce the random influence of surface charges.12 Magnitudes of the QCSE scatter widely in spherical NCs, an effect which has previously been attributed to the presence of a permanent dipole moment of variable amplitude.5,13,14 Introducing shape control to the QCSE allows us to correlate shape and orientation directly with the observed QCSE magnitudes. To date the QCSE has only been investigated in zerodimensional QDs of either colloidal or epitaxial origin, which have a comparatively small spatial volume and a symmetric spatial carrier confinement of electrons and holes,5,15-19 making them particularly sensitive to the effect of randomly distributed surface charges.5 As meandering surface charges yield a unique signature in spectral diffusion once the nanoparticle symmetry is broken,12 we expect our elongated
Nano Lett., Vol. 5, No. 10, 2005

NCs to provide an excellent intermediate between threedimensional (QDs)5 and one-dimensional (quantum wells)8-10 strong confinement to explore the QCSE. Very recently, Rothenberg et al. studied the effect of electric fields on the emission of single bare CdSe nanorods and observed fieldinduced intensity modulations along with spectral shifts.20 By trapping the hole in CdSe, we are able to simplify the physical problem of field effects in one dimension and apply a quantum mechanical description of the effect. This reveals that intensity modulations are a result of changes in radiative and not in nonradiative rates. Controlling shell growth along the wurtzite c-axis allows a tuning of AR from 1.6 (almost spherical) to 4.11 A band diagram of the structures is given in Figure 1a. Compared to bare CdSe nanorods21 these asymmetric heterostructure NCs should exhibit a substantial difference in the level of confinement of electrons and holes, which controls the exciton lifetime. Figure 1b shows the fluorescence decay for NCs of AR 1.6 and 4, respectively, dispersed in toluene solution. The emission rate decreases strongly with increasing AR. Although the decay is nonexponential, we can approximate the radiative rate rad-1 ) Q/PL by simply extracting the 1/e fluorescence time (PL) and taking into account the photoluminescence (PL) quantum yield Q, which was previously reported in ref 11. Although this choice of PL is not strictly accurate, it provides greater physical consistency than achievable with multi- or even stretched exponential treatment of the data. We note that the functionality of the decay curves is similar in all cases so that a choice of PL as e-1, 10-1, 10-2, or 10-3 of the initial intensity does not change the dependence on aspect ratio. The radiative decay rate rad-1, shown in Figure 1c, decreases by a factor of 5 with increasing AR, supporting the picture of a delocalized electron recombining with a hole localized on the CdSe core. Figure 1a illustrates the computed wave functions. To unravel the interplay between geometrical shape, emission energy, and wave function overlap, the electronic states of the NCs are modeled using a semiempirical iterative approach and an isotropic effective mass approximation. The Coulombic electron-hole interaction, which analytical calculations have shown to account for 20% of the confinement energy in spherical particles,22 is incorporated into our numerical model by an effective potential Ve,h

( (

p22 r r r r r + Vcb(b) + Vh(b) + Vext(b) e(b) ) Eee(b) 2me*(b) r (1) p22 r r r r r + Vvb(b) + Ve(b) - Vext(b) h(b) ) Ehh(b) 2mh*(b) r (2)

) )

where Vvb and Vcb are the valence and conduction band potentials, respectively, and Vext indicates an external potential due to an applied electric field, which is initially set to zero. The first term in the two equations corresponds to the kinetic energy with an effective mass m* depending on the local material (mh*(CdSe) ) 0.45; me*(CdSe) ) 0.13; mh*(CdS) ) 0.7; me*(CdS) ) 0.26,7). The second term
2045

represents the valence and conduction band energies, and the third one constitutes the electron-hole interaction mediated through an effective potential. The wave functions were solved iteratively using a finite element method with a sequential optimization of Ve,h following the Hartree selfconsistent potential approach.23 Excellent agreement to within 5% is found between our calculation and prior analytical estimates of the correlation energy in spherical NCs.22 Due to a valence band offset of 0.78 eV between the two materials, the hole is confined in the core for all ARs. Although the band gaps of CdSe and CdS are well-known (1.68 and 2.46 eV, respectively24), the values for the conduction band offset e scatter widely throughout the literature from -0.3 to 0.3 eV.24-26 The lines in Figure 1c indicate the squared wave function overlap integral (which governs the radiative rate8-10) for three different conduction band offsets. An offset of only 0.1 eV leads to strong localization of the electron inside the core. |h|e|2 consequently varies by only 15% with AR, far below the experimental result. In contrast, for e ) -0.1 eV the electron quickly delocalizes into the shell for moderate ARs, decreasing |h|e|2 by over a factor of 20. A conduction band offset of e ) 0 eV allows the wave function overlap to decrease within the same range as the measured radiative rate. e ) 0 eV lies within the range of reported values24-26 and will be used for subsequent calculations as it satisfactorily reproduces both transition energies (not shown) and rates (Figure 1c). A core radius of 2 nm (consistent with electron microscopy11) provides the best agreement between experiment and theory. Naturally, the model constitutes only the simplest conceivable approximation to the electronic states and neglects static effects due to the crystal anisotropy and internal fields. As we are primarily interested in the influence of physical shape, we feel confident in disregarding these potential perturbations. Increasing the NC volume and thereby decreasing the confinement of the electron will make the electron wave function more sensitive to external perturbations such as electric fields. The magnitude of the Stark shift in quantum wells depends strongly on the well width.9 For narrow wells the spatial separation of the charge carriers is insufficient to allow an electric field to induce a pronounced change in the energy levels, whereas larger widths enable efficient separation of charge carriers. This leads to an increased QCSE at the expense of reduced overall quantum confinement. In NCs with three-dimensional strong confinement it has, however, not previously been possible to quantify the influence of the external field perturbation and the resulting Stark shifts on the actual single particle waVe functions. Prior descriptions of the QCSE in QDs followed a semiclassical formalism.5,15,17-19 Strong confinement of only one of the two constituents of the exciton should simplify deductions concerning the effect of applied electric fields. Furthermore, this new approach facilitates quantitative investigation of QCSE magnitudes in colloidal nanostructures and introduces the novel aspect of geometrical anisotropy. To do this, the spectroscopy has to be carried out on single NCs5,15 so as to minimize the influence of inhomogeneous spectral broaden2046

Figure 2. QCSE in the single particle emission at 5 K. (a) Normalized emission spectra of a single NC in an external electric field showing a strong QCSE. The solid line corresponds to a model calculation assuming that the NC lies parallel to the external field. The insets schematically indicate the band structure in the presence of an external field of negative and positive sign, respectively. (b) Single NC exhibiting a weak QCSE of up to 5 meV. The model calculation under the assumption of the electric field vector being perpendicular to the NC long axis is superimposed.

ing and the random nanoparticle orientation. To apply electric fields to a single NC, a strongly diluted solution of NCs in polystyrene was spin cast from toluene onto interdigitated Al finger electrodes (height 50 nm, spacing 8 m), providing randomly oriented single NCs with an average separation of 5 m. The sample was mounted in a coldfinger He cryostat and cooled to 5 K. Nonresonant illumination with a continuous wave Ar+ laser in a dark field configuration (457.9 nm) allowed PL collection with an epifluorescence microscope (NA: 0.55).12 The normalized and averaged PL spectra of a single elongated NC exposed to a repeatedly cycled electric field are shown in Figure 2a in dependence of field. The nanoparticle exhibits a strong QCSE (80 meV at 600 kV/ cm, or 50 times the zero-field line width) and displays line broadening, which varies approximately as the square root of the energetic shift.5 The LO phonon satellite of CdSe at 27 meV also increases from 0.2 to 1 relative intensity with respect to the zero-phonon line with electric field, in agreement with prior reports on spherical NCs.5 As the sign of the voltage changes from negative to positive the emission becomes virtually independent of electric field. This is a direct manifestation of the spatially asymmetric band structure of the NC. Application of a field to the NC excited state dipole results in more substantial electron penetration into the CdS shell and a considerable red shift. The second case
Nano Lett., Vol. 5, No. 10, 2005

is illustrated in Figure 2b, where the emission of the NC shifts near symmetrically by only 5 meV. These two effects are accurately reproduced quantitatively using the numerical model (solid line) by adding an additional external electric potential. As the orientation of the NC long axis with respect to the field is not preset, the orientation constitutes the only free parameter in modeling the data. Whereas substantial electron penetration into the CdS shell can occur for the case of parallel orientation, orthogonal orientation to the field barely modifies the transition energy as the hole cannot penetrate the shell as illustrated in the sketch in Figure 2a. The higher dielectric constant of the NC compared to the matrix introduces an effective dielectric screening, which reduces the field inside the NC by a factor of 4 (i.e., the ratio of dielectric constants NC 9.5 and Matrix 2.5). The quantitative agreement between experiment and theory demonstrates that Stark spectroscopy can be used as a tool to provide insight into the electronic wave function distributions and the nanoparticle geometry. A QCSE should also occur orthogonally to the long axis, in analogy to spherical NCs.5 This is expected to result in a small but symmetrical Stark shift as demonstrated in Figure 2b. In this case the maximal Stark shift is reduced to 5 meV, comparable to the case for spherical NCs.5 The calculations also provide an estimate for the influence of the correlation energy in dependence of the electric field. Whereas this is estimated as 20% of the confinement energy in spherical particles,22 we find that it is reduced to 9% in the nanorods. Separation of the carrier wave functions at a field of 600 kV/cm lowers the correlation energy to 0.1%, pushing the carriers together at an equally strong field raises the contribution to 28%. Spectral diffusion and jumping plays a major role in this class of QDs5,12-14 and is also observed during the application of external electric fields. Surface charge can lead to the formation of a permanent dipole moment on the NC,27 which changes a weak quadratic QCSE into a strong linear one.5 Alternatively, surface charges can shield the exciton from the external field.5 Redistribution of surface charge is driven by the excess photon energy pumped into the system and occurs in the absence of discrete PL switching (i.e., ionization) events.12-14 To minimize the influence of spectral diffusion, low excitation powers (<5 Wcm-2) were used. We did not observe any evidence of field induced surface charge rearrangement, which would be manifested in a hysteresis or driving frequency dependence of the QCSE, and can thus exclude the presence of mobile surface charges. If the external electric field separates the wave functions spatially due to simple electrostatic displacement of electron and hole in opposite directions, the radiative rate should also decrease. Under the assumption that nonradiative decay remains unchanged, the emission intensity of a single NC will decrease with increasing red shift of the emission. Figure 3 shows the field dependence of emission spectra of a single NC. In contrast to Figure 2, the spectra shown for this particular particle are not intensity normalized. The red shift of 25 meV for negative fields is accompanied by a decrease in the luminescence intensity down to almost the background level at -375 kV/cm. Figure 3b summarizes the integrated
Nano Lett., Vol. 5, No. 10, 2005

Figure 3. Field-induced intensity modulation of the single (nonnormalized) NC emission at 5 K. (a) Single NC spectra in dependence of electric field (blue, lowest intensity; red, highest intensity). (b) Integrated emission intensity of a single NC as a function of field. The lines indicate model calculations.

intensity, which decreases by a factor of 10 for negative fields. The field perturbation thus allows us to switch the electronic transition of this single photon source on and off by moving the two charges constituting the exciton toward each other or away from each other. The quantum efficiency of single NCs is generally poorly defined and varies with time.28,29 Taking a reasonable average value for the quantum efficiency of 50% for zero fields,11,28,29 and estimating the angle between the rod and the electric field direction from the strength of the QCSE, the measured emission intensity is quantitatively reproduced in Figure 3b by calculating |h|e|2 (i.e., the radiative rate) as a function of electric field (solid line), assuming that it is only the radiative rate which is modified by the electric field. As the NCs are randomly oriented with respect to the electric field, we observe a random distribution of QCSE magnitudes. Small QCSEs imply small electron-hole displacements. Concomitantly, the change in radiative rate should be small and consequently the modulation of intensity by the field. Figure 4a summarizes the field induced intensity modulation IMax/IMin for 88 NCs as a function of their Stark shifts at 350 kV/cm. The large squares correspond to an average binned over 5 meV to reduce the statistical scatter in the data points. Although the intensity modulation exhibits a substantial scatter, a clear correlation exists between QCSE strength and PL quenching: the magnitude of PL intensity modulation increases with increasing spectral shift. This correlation is a straightforward consequence of the QCSE in agreement with the microscopic picture of electrostatic wave function engineering illustrated in the inset of Figure 2a. The observed QCSE strengths range from a negligible shift to up to 45 meV for this particular set of data. This wide distribution occurs for two reasons. First, the QCSE depends on the orientation of the elongated axis of the NCs with respect to the electric field, which is random. Second, electron microscopy shows that the ARs of single nanoparticles scatter considerably due to the polydispersity of the sample, which increases with increasing average AR.11 The different ARs can be distinguished spectrally on the single
2047

orientation). Such a distribution is expected from a simple statistical treatment of the probability density of the orientational particle distribution (green line). In conclusion, we have demonstrated direct engineering of the single particle wave function in colloidal NCs by changing the geometric shape and by electrostatic perturbation. The emission properties can be described in terms of an extended effective mass model and yield direct insight into the single particle wave function. Elongated NCs exhibit enhanced Stark shifts due to the increased spatial volume enabling effective charge carrier separation, making them interesting as switchable single photon sources and ultrasensitive charge detectors.12 Acknowledgment. We are grateful to W. Stadler, A. Helfrich, and C. Holopirek for technical assistance. We thank the DFG for financial support through the SFB 486 and the Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Preis and the EU through the RTN HYTEC. References
(1) Marzin, J. Y.; Gerard, J. M.; Izrael, A.; Barrier, D.; Bastard, G. Phys. ReV. Lett. 1994, 73, 716-719. (2) Karrai, K.; Warburton, R. J.; Schulhauser, C.; Hogele, A.; Urbaszek, B.; McGhee, E. J.; Govorov, A. O.; Garcia, J. M.; Gerardot, B. D.; Petroff, P. M. Nature 2004, 427, 135-138. (3) Alivisatos, A. P. Science 1996, 271, 933-937. (4) Guillet, T.; Berrehar, J.; Grousson, R.; Kovensky, J.; LapersonneMeyer, C.; Schott, M.; Voliotis, V. Phys. ReV. Lett. 2001, 87, 087401. (5) Empedocles, S. A.; Bawendi, M. G. Science 1997, 278, 2114-2117. (6) Mews, A.; Eychmuller, A.; Giersig, M.; Schooss, D.; Weller, H. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 934-941. (7) Haus, J. W.; Zhou, H. S.; Honma, I.; Komiyama, H. Phys. ReV. B 1993, 47, 1359-1365. (8) Polland, H. J.; Schultheis, L.; Kuhl, J.; Gobel, E. O.; Tu, C. W. Phys. ReV. Lett. 1985, 55, 2610-2613. (9) Bastard, G.; Mendez, E. E.; Chang, L. L.; Esaki, L. Phys. ReV. B 1983, 28, 3241-3245. (10) Miller, D. A. B.; Weiner, J. S.; Chemla, D. S. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 1986, 22, 1816-1830. (11) Talapin, D. V.; Koeppe, R.; Gotzinger, S.; Kornowski, A.; Lupton, J. M.; Rogach, A. L.; Benson, O.; Feldmann, J.; Weller, H. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 1677-1681. (12) Muller, J.; Lupton, J. M.; Rogach, A. L.; Feldmann, J.; Talapin, D. V.; Weller, H. Phys. ReV. Lett. 2004, 93, 167402. (13) Empedocles, S. A.; Bawendi, M. G. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 1826-1830. (14) Neuhauser, R. G.; Shimizu, K. T.; Woo, W. K.; Empedocles, S. A.; Bawendi, M. G. Phys. ReV. Lett. 2000, 85, 3301-3304. (15) Empedocles, S. A.; Neuhauser, R.; Shimizu, K.; Bawendi, M. G. AdV. Mater. 1999, 11, 1243-1256. (16) Seufert, J.; Obert, M.; Rambach, M.; Bacher, G.; Forchel, A.; Passow, T.; Leonardi, K.; Hommel, D. Physica E 2002, 13, 147-150. (17) Heller, W.; Bockelmann, U.; Abstreiter, G. Phys. ReV. B 1998, 57, 6270-6273. (18) Seufert, J.; Obert, M.; Scheibner, M.; Gippius, N. A.; Bacher, G.; Forchel, A.; Passow, T.; Leonardi, K.; Hommel, D. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 79, 1033-1035. (19) Alen, B.; Bickel, F.; Karrai, K.; Warburton, R. J.; Petroff, P. M. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 83, 2235-2237. (20) Rothenberg, E.; Kazes, M.; Shaviv, E.; Banin, U. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 1581-1586. (21) Hu, J. T.; Li, L. S.; Yang, W. D.; Manna, L.; Wang, L. W.; Alivisatos, A. P. Science 2001, 292, 2060-2063. (22) Brus, L. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 80, 4403-4409. (23) Janssens, K. L.; Partoens, B.; Peeters, F. M. Phys. ReV. B 2001, 6415, 155324. (24) Nethercot, A. H. Phys. ReV. Lett. 1974, 33, 1088.

Figure 4. Statistics of the QCSE for 88 single nanoparticles. (a) Correlation between the maximum QCSE shift and the overall intensity modulation (black squares). Large squares indicate 5 meV average bins. (b) Statistical distribution of the QCSE magnitude as a function of emission wavelength. The gray triangle highlights the increase of the QCSE with the decreasing emission energy, corresponding to increasing AR and electron penetration volume with triangular scatter arising due to the random particle orientation. (c) Frequency of occurrence of a particular Stark shift illustrating an isotropic spatial distribution of the particles with respect to the field. The green line indicates the statistically expected distribution.

NC level because higher ARs result in a red shift of the emission energy. Consequently, NCs emitting at higher energy show a smaller QCSE when compared to NCs emitting further in the red. Figure 4b illustrates the distribution of the QCSE as a function of peak emission energy, which manifests a strong correlation. For the highest energy NCs the QCSE is almost negligible, whereas it increases steadily toward lower energy. This is in full agreement with the model that the QCSE increases with increasing AR due to an increase in penetration volume for the perturbed electron wave function.9 The minimum QCSE observed, however, does not depend on emission energy. This is a direct consequence of the random NC orientation, which leads to a triangular distribution in Figure 4b. The random orientation is also manifested in the histogram of QCSE magnitudes given in Figure 4c. The distribution is flat up to the cutoff of the maximal achievable shift (for parallel
2048

Nano Lett., Vol. 5, No. 10, 2005

(25) Trager-Cowan, C.; Parbrook, P. J.; Henderson, B.; Odonnell, K. P. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 1992, 7, 536-541. (26) ODonnell, K. P.; Parbrook, P. J.; Yang, F.; Chen, X.; Irvine, D. J.; Tragercowan, C.; Henderson, B.; Wright, P. J.; Cockayne, B. J. Cryst. Growth 1992, 117, 497-500. (27) Klimov, V. I.; McBranch, D. W. Phys. ReV. B 1997, 55, 13173-13179.

(28) Ebenstein, Y.; Mokari, T.; Banin, U. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 80, 4033-4035. (29) Schlegel, G.; Bohnenberger, J.; Potapova, I.; Mews, A. Phys. ReV. Lett. 2002, 88, 137401.

NL051596X

Nano Lett., Vol. 5, No. 10, 2005

2049

You might also like