A Simple Guide To Antenna Selection
A Simple Guide To Antenna Selection
Dan Franklin
Selecting an antenna for testing can sometimes be straightforward but often requires some specific consideration.
One aspect in antenna selection is knowing the intended test frequencies and then selecting a matching antenna.
Not all antennas are created equal, and when it comes to frequency different antenna styles perform better at some
frequencies and not at others. Some special considerations are sometimes required in antenna design typically at
very high and very low frequencies. Take an antenna for a low frequency in the kHz range. A single wavelength at
this range is on the order of miles long. Even a ¼ wavelength antenna at kHz frequencies is impractical at around
10,000 ft long. To get a better understanding of wavelength size and frequency, this calculator is helpful.
Low frequency radio signals tend to act more like low frequency audio, traveling through and around objects in non-
directional ways. On the other hand, elements for high frequency antennas on the order of GHz can be very small,
but signals tend to propagate in very directional ways more like light, but also won’t go around or through objects.
Because of this, low frequency signals are naturally more omnidirectional and high frequency ones are more
directional. Attempting to make directional low frequency antennas or omnidirectional high frequency ones can be
challenging.
Other antenna design factors such as bandwidth are frequency-dependent as well. High frequencies require more
precise length elements, making it more difficult to construct a wide bandwidth high frequency antenna, but some
designs manage to achieve this.
Loop antennas
For low frequencies below 30 MHz, loop antennas are ideal for magnetic field strength
measurements. These consist of a typically circular loop or coil; the size and number of
turns of the loop impacts the frequency the antenna works on. Without any matching
network, loop antennas are resonant such that the circumference is a single
wavelength of the desired frequency. They can be adjusted with a matching Figure 1. Loop antenna. Source:
network to be anywhere from 10% of the size up to full size wavelength. A.H. Systems
Loop antennas are convenient to use due to their small size relative to their frequency. For magnetic field testing at
low frequencies, loop antennas produce a voltage for a given field strength, making them easy to use. They are
less ideal for higher frequencies due to their size and response characteristics.
Monopoles
Monopoles can be used in many frequency ranges depending on their size, but
like other antennas get larger at lower frequencies. Matching networks used with
monopoles allow them to work over a wider range. Monopoles are constructed of
a ground plane that is typically around ¼ wavelength and a single
radiating/reception element in the middle of the ground plane and Figure 2. Monopole antenna size. Source:
perpendicular to it. Monopoles are good for measuring the electric field in A.H. Systems
testing.
The hybrid or biological antenna design is a mix of a log periodic and a bow tie type
design as a reflector. This antenna design has a wideband response, making it a Figure 3. Log periodic antenna.
good choice for testing a wide range of frequencies without having to switch Source: A.H. Systems
antennas. It can be used for immunity and other compliance testing with repeatable
results.
Dipoles
The dipole is a simple design and is considered somewhat of a standard when it comes to antennas. Its design
consists of two equal length of tuned elements in line with each other but opposite in direction. The elements on a
dipole are typically tuned to ¼ wavelength such that the total length is ½ wavelength. The dipole is simple but also
an effective antenna with a radiation pattern that covers a 360° doughnut-like pattern when vertically polarized.
When horizontally polarized, the same doughnut pattern makes them bi-directional. Shorter dipoles can also be
constructed with matching network components. The dipole does not have a very wide bandwidth and while still
useful it is less desirable for testing a wide range of frequencies as it requires adjustments or multiple antennas for
different test frequencies.
Biconical antennas
Biconical antennas are a modified type of dipole where the two elements form a roughly conical shape. This
change allows them to have a wider bandwidth versus a regular dipole. The cones used on these are rarely solid
and are often made of multiple elements, making them easier to fold or transport. Their broadband nature allows
quick testing without having to adjust or change the antenna. They are linearly polarized and typically work in
frequency from 20 MHz to 300 MHz, but when designed for it, they can work as high as 18 GHz.
Horns
At frequencies around 1 GHz and higher, a horn antenna becomes a practical
choice. Horns are too large for sub-1 GHz use but they work well for high
frequencies. Horn antennas are very directional both for receiving and
transmitting so they can both pick up weak signals and transmit a strong signal to
a device. This makes them a good choice for both immunity and emission
testing.
Figure 4. Horn antenna. Source:
Above 1 GHz a horn is still a good choice and they get physically smaller
A.H. Systems
and more directional as frequency increases. Horns work well up to 40
GHz and above, but the addition of a pre-amplifier for reception is a good
addition to improve the dynamic range of the antenna.
Conclusion
Selecting the right antenna for a situation can sometimes seem confusing when considering all the necessary
criteria. Frequency is a paramount consideration and often the starting point for a design. To help get past the
confusion, contact an expert in the field. A.H. Systems carries a line of antennas for all kinds of testing situations
and can help best fit your application or need.