Employees' Assessment of Their Time Management and Work - Life Balance
Employees' Assessment of Their Time Management and Work - Life Balance
2, JUNE 2024
JESSZON B. CANO1, CHRIS JOHN I. CASUL2, JEMSEL R. CALIPES3, JOVELYN AYOP4, CIARA P.
EROY5, RICA YVONNE A. EXCLAMADOR6, ALVIN B. PARDONCILLO7
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Bohol Island State University – Candijay
Candijay, Bohol, Philippines
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54476/ioer-imrj/447719
ABSTRACT
In an organizational context, various resources like finances, manpower, and materials are essential.
However, time stands out as a universally shared resource. This study explored how effectively time could
be managed to enhance performance, focusing on employees' time management at LGU Anda's office.
The study had three main objectives: first, to profile respondents in terms of demographics and
departmental details; second, to assess the extent of standard time management practices among
employees; and third, to examine their work-life balance concerning happiness, job satisfaction, work
environment, stress management, remote work, relaxation time, and loyalty. A literature review on
effective time management among employees was conducted to support the study, aiding in study
formulation and research streamlining. A descriptive research design was adopted, employing a
standardized questionnaire to collect data. Data collection methods included questionnaires, interviews,
and observations, with results presented through percentages, frequency distributions, and tables.
Respondent profiles were analyzed using percentage and frequency, providing insights into demographic
characteristics such as age, gender, education, and experience. Evaluation of time management and
work-life balance utilized weighted mean, considering both importance and satisfaction levels of various
factors. This approach offered a nuanced understanding of how employees manage time and balance
their personal and professional lives. Overall, findings indicated that most employees were relatively new
and young in their roles, with limited experience. The sample comprised 83 respondents, revealing a
strong implementation of time management practices and a solid grasp of time's value.
2.8. In terms of Job Loyalty The composite mean of 2.83 indicates that the
employees of LGU Anda. “Employee Work-life
The sub-composite mean of 2.97 for the Balance” shows that employees’ practices were
employee work-life was “Agree” in terms of “Agree.” This means that time management is
employees' practices regarding job loyalty. essential to allocate time for their priorities. Then to
prioritize the two, learn to separate personal from
Table 9
Work-Life Balance as to Job Loyalty, (n=83) professional. Having separate to-do lists,
Items WM Description scheduling time for things, and just being realistic
VIII. Job Loyalty will never be stuck. Furthermore, many studies
1. I plan to stay at my current job for
the foreseeable future
3.09 Agree confirm the positive significant influence of work-life
2. I would recommend my job to
3.05 Agree
balance on productivity, specifically stating that
someone else flexible work arrangements significantly increase
3. I love my job even though I
receive a small amount of salary
3.05 Agree employee productivity (Abioro et al., 2018; & Ansari
4. I do not mind being too busy
3.05 Agree et al., 2015). Finally, Koushki et al. (2019) found a
because I love my job strong significant relationship between
5. Whatever may happen, I would
2.63 Agree organizational commitment and employee
never leave my job
Sub-composite Mean 2.97 Agree productivity.