Full Download Electromyography and Neuromuscular Disorders: Clinical-Electrophysiologic-Ultrasound Correlations 4th Edition Edition David Preston PDF
Full Download Electromyography and Neuromuscular Disorders: Clinical-Electrophysiologic-Ultrasound Correlations 4th Edition Edition David Preston PDF
https://ebookmass.com/product/electromyography-
and-neuromuscular-disorders-clinical-
electrophysiologic-ultrasound-correlations-4th-
edition-edition-david-preston/
OR CLICK BUTTON
DOWLOAD NOW
https://ebookmass.com/product/electromyography-and-neuromuscular-
disorders-e-book-clinical-electrophysiologic-ultrasound-
correlations/
https://ebookmass.com/product/neuromuscular-disorders-treatment-
and-management-2nd-edition-tulio-e-bertorini/
https://ebookmass.com/product/electromyography-in-clinical-
practice-3rd-edition-ebook-pdf/
https://ebookmass.com/product/clinical-chemistry-principles-
techniques-correlations-eighth-north/
Textbook of Biochemistry with Clinical Correlations,
7th Edition 7th Edition, (Ebook PDF)
https://ebookmass.com/product/textbook-of-biochemistry-with-
clinical-correlations-7th-edition-7th-edition-ebook-pdf/
https://ebookmass.com/product/electromyography-in-clinical-
practice-a-case-study-approach-3rd-edition-edition-bashar-
katirji/
https://ebookmass.com/product/electromyography-in-clinical-
practice-a-case-study-approach-2nd-edition-ebook-pdf/
https://ebookmass.com/product/small-animal-diagnostic-
ultrasound-4th-edition-john-s-mattoon/
https://ebookmass.com/product/sonography-scanning-principles-and-
protocols-ultrasound-scanning-4th-edition-ebook-pdf-version/
Fourth Edition
Electromyography
and Neuromuscular
Disorders
CLINICAL-ELECTROPHYSIOLOGIC-ULTRASOUND
CORRELATIONS
David C. Preston, MD
Professor of Neurology
Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine
Program Director, Neurology Residency
Vice Chairman, Department of Neurology
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or
mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without
permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further information about the
Publisher’s permissions policies and our arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance
Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency, can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions.
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the Publisher
(other than as may be noted herein).
Notice
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and
using any information, methods, compounds or experiments described herein. Because of rapid advances
in the medical sciences, in particular, independent verification of diagnoses and drug dosages should be
made. To the fullest extent of the law, no responsibility is assumed by Elsevier, authors, editors or
contributors for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability,
negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas
contained in the material herein.
Printed in Canada
Foreword
Electromyography (EMG) is a relatively new test. When although EMG and related tests are a powerful and sensi-
I started my residency training at the Mayo Clinic in tive technology, they are also subject to interpretive error.
1973 with Drs. Ed Lambert and Jasper Daube, it was not As such, they must always be evaluated in light of careful
widely available, and the equipment was rudimentary. The consideration of the clinical findings by an experienced cli-
machines were based on vacuum tube technology, were nician. Improperly interpreted or performed EMG tests can
large and cumbersome, took up most of the room, and had lead to useless diagnostic tests and dangerous treatments.
to be tweaked and calibrated. Filters had to be set manually On virtually a weekly basis, patients are referred to my
for each patient as well as each test. Heating lamps were not clinic because of tests done improperly or misinterpreted
necessary because the heat alone from these machines in a in the light of the clinical findings. Thus there is a need for
small room was enough to keep patients warm and make publications that continue to teach the clinical approach to
the neophyte trainee perspire, especially when the instruc- neurophysiology.
tor entered the room. Although several excellent texts cover the technical and,
Since then, much has changed. New technology has to some extent, clinical aspects of EMG, this book by Pres-
produced compact, microchip-based, and highly accurate ton and Shapiro is unique in its emphasis on clinical and
and reliable machines. Gains and filters are available at EMG correlation. The book amply and clearly covers the
the touch of a button. Moreover, fostered by the efforts of technical aspects, but its strength lies in its emphasis on
pioneers such as Lambert, Daube, and many others, there clinical/neurophysiologic correlation, a hands-on, interac-
has been an explosion of knowledge in the field of EMG tive approach for the reader, and a style that most closely
and clinical neurophysiology. As a result, we now know a approximates how a clinical neurophysiologist thinks when
great deal about the neurophysiologic findings in many dis- approaching a complicated patient. The authors’ discus-
eases of the peripheral nervous system. Indeed, for those sion of potential pitfalls in testing is also most helpful. The
of us in the day-to-day practice of clinical neuromuscular authors’ admonition that, when in doubt, the examiner
diseases and clinical neurophysiology, EMG and related should stop stimulating and needling, retake the history,
electrophysiologic studies can be an enormous help in diag- and repeat the clinical examination bears repeating to every
nosis and management. Most of us regard EMG as the single trainee in every program.
most useful test in clarifying the differential diagnosis of an This text will be a positive and important addition to the
obscure neuromuscular problem, second only to the clinical EMG literature. It will be helpful to trainees in EMG and
examination. should also be useful as a refresher to experienced electro-
We all pay lip service to the concept that the EMG is myographers. I congratulate Drs. Preston and Shapiro on an
an extension of the clinical examination and best used in excellent book. I’m jealous: I wish I had written it.
conjunction with a careful clinical examination. In practice,
however, there are many occasions when this rule is violated, John J. Kelly Jr., MD
and there has been a trend lately to develop “clinical neuro- Chief, Department of Neurology
physiologists” who practice in the laboratory and have little Deputy Director, Cooper Neurological Institute
clinical experience. This is a dangerous approach, because Camden, New Jersey
Dr. Kelly’s most recent position is Chair Emeritus, Department of Neurology, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
xi
supervision. The continued goal of this text is to present text, one can sit down with a patient, take a history, perform
material in an easily understandable and logical manner. We a physical examination, and use the appropriate electrodi-
have often commented to our students that with knowl- agnostic studies, with ultrasound if indicated, to reach the
edge of anatomy, physiology, and neurologic localization, the most accurate and complete diagnosis.
practice of electrodiagnostic studies makes sense. With the
addition of ultrasound correlation, it now makes even more David C. Preston
sense. We hope that with the information contained in this Barbara E. Shapiro
xiii
Like the first edition, this text is meant to provide a Finally, the goal of this text is to present material in an
single resource for those physicians training in or practicing easily understandable and logical manner. The authors have
electrodiagnostic studies. From our perspective of teaching often commented to their students that with knowledge of
for many years, both on a post-graduate and residency level, anatomy, physiology, and neurologic localization, the prac-
we feel that if one can master the fundamentals in this book, tice of electrodiagnostic studies makes sense. We hope that
one should have all the basic concepts and information one with the information contained in this text, one can sit down
needs to competently understand and interpret electro- with a patient, take a history, perform a physical examina-
diagnostic studies. Although a great deal of information is tion, and use the appropriate electrodiagnostic studies to
presented regarding the performance of studies, there is no reach a diagnosis.
substitute for hands-on experience under supervision. How-
ever, it is our hope that with the companion CD as part of DCP
the textbook, the recognition and interpretation of EMG BES
waveforms will be easier to master.
xvii
Dedication
Acknowledgments
The authors are indebted to their mentors in clinical neuro- the early parts of our academic and publishing careers. Then
physiology: Drs. John J. Kelly, Jr., Eric L. Logigian, and Bhag- there are a host of individuals whose books, presentations,
wan T. Shahani. Dr. Bashar Katirji, our friend and colleague courses, and research ignited our passion in neuromuscular
for more than 20 years, has been an inspiration and a great ultrasound. Among them are Drs. Francis O. Walker, Michael
partner in teaching, research, and patient care in clinical neu- S. Cartwright, Lisa D. Hobson-Webb, Jeff Strakowski, Lucia
romuscular disorders and electrophysiology. In addition, the Padua, Stefano Bianchi, Carlo Martinoli, Andrea J. Boon,
authors wish to thank their colleagues, technologists, and Leo Visser, Craig M. Zaidman, Antonios Kerasnoudis, H.
present and former Neuromuscular and EMG fellows at the Stephan Goedee, James B. Caress, and Joon Shik Yoon. At
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, the Brigham Elsevier, Melanie Tucker, Lisa Barnes, and Doug Turner were
and Women’s Hospital, and the Massachusetts General Hos- instrumental in bringing the fourth edition into print and
pital. The contributions of Dale Preston, Thayer Preston, electronic forms. And of course we will always be grateful
and Richard (Zack) Zydek to the photography are greatly to our dear friend, Susan Pioli, who has been there since the
appreciated. A special thanks to our friend, colleague, and inception of this book and was instrumental in bringing the
mentor, Dr. Martin A. Samuels, who was instrumental in first and second editions to publication.
SECTION I • Overview of Nerve Conduction Studies and Electromyography
1
2 SECTION I Overview of Nerve Conduction Studies and Electromyography
/RFDOL]DWLRQ
3OH[RSDWK\ *HQHUDOL]HG
0RQRQHXURSDWK\ &UDQLREXOEDU
0XOWLSOH
Fig. 1.2 Possible localizations determined from PRQRQHXURSDWKLHV
the electrodiagnostic study. CNS, Central nervous
system; NMJ, neuromuscular junction. 3RO\QHXURSDWK\
Chapter 1 • Approach to Nerve Conduction Studies, Electromyography, and Neuromuscular Ultrasound 3
1HXURSDWKLF
3DWKRORJ\
)LEHUW\SHVLQYROYHG 7HPSRUDOFRXUVH
,PSOLFDWLRQVIRUSURJQRVLV
0L[HG 6XEDFXWH
$FTXLUHG ,QKHULWHG Fig. 1.3 Key electrodiagnostic findings in a neuro-
&KURQLF pathic localization.
imaging (MRI) scan of the cervical spine to assess a pos- Conversely, predominantly motor or predominantly sensory
sible cervical radiculopathy because the EDX studies dem- neuropathies are rare and suggest a much more limited set of
onstrated an ulnar neuropathy at the elbow as the source disorders. For instance, a patient with numbness in the hands
of the patient’s symptoms. This is a situation where neuro- and feet and diminished reflexes may be diagnosed with a
muscular U/S may be particularly useful, able to precisely peripheral neuropathy. However, if EDX studies demon-
localize the lesion and help assess for anatomic etiologies. strate abnormal sensory nerve conductions with completely
In a patient with a CNS disorder who is mistaken as hav- normal motor nerve conductions and needle EMG, then the
ing a peripheral disorder, the EDX study often correctly sug- differential diagnosis changes from a peripheral neuropathy
gests that the localization is central. For example, transverse to a pure sensory neuropathy or neuronopathy, which has a
myelitis may mimic Guillain-Barré syndrome, or a small much more limited differential diagnosis.
acute cortical stroke may occasionally mimic the pattern of Second, EDX studies often can define whether the
a brachial plexopathy or mononeuropathy. In settings such underlying pathophysiology is demyelination or axonal loss.
as these, the EDX study is often the first test to suggest that Although most demyelinating neuropathies have some sec-
the correct localization is central rather than peripheral. ondary axonal loss and many axonal loss neuropathies have
some secondary demyelination, EDX studies usually can
differentiate between a primary demyelinating and a pri-
Neuropathic Localization mary axonal neuropathy. Because EDX studies usually can
Neuropathic is probably the most common localization made make this differentiation quickly and noninvasively, nerve
on EDX studies. Neuropathic literally means a disorder of biopsy is essentially never required to make this determi-
the peripheral nerves. However, in common usage, it includes nation. Furthermore, the differentiation between primary
the primary sensory and motor neurons as well. EDX stud- axonal and primary demyelinating pathology is of consid-
ies are particularly helpful in neuropathic conditions. First, in erable diagnostic and prognostic importance, especially in
conjunction with the history and examination, they can usu- the case of polyneuropathies. Most polyneuropathies are
ally further localize the disorder to the neurons, roots, plexus, associated with primary axonal degeneration, which has an
or peripheral nerve. In the case of peripheral nerves, further extensive differential diagnosis. In contrast, the number
localization is usually possible to a single nerve (mononeu- of true electrophysiologic primary demyelinating neuropa-
ropathy), multiple individual nerves (mononeuropathy mul- thies is extremely small. They are generally subdivided into
tiplex), or all nerves (polyneuropathy). In the case of a single those that are inherited and those that are acquired (e.g.,
nerve, the exact segment of nerve responsible for the prob- Charcot Marie Tooth [CMT] vs. CIDP). EDX studies can
lem may be localized in some cases. typically make that determination as well. The finding of
In the case of neuropathic lesions, EDX studies often an unequivocal primary demyelinating polyneuropathy on
yield further key information, including the fiber types EDX studies often leads quickly to the correct diagnosis
involved, the underlying pathophysiology, and the temporal and, in the case of an acquired demyelinating polyneuropa-
course of the disorder (Fig. 1.3). thy, often suggests a potentially treatable disorder.
Information About the Fiber Types Involved and the Assessing the Degree of Axonal Loss Versus
Underlying Nerve Pathophysiology can be Gained, Demyelination has Implications for Severity and
Which Then Further Narrows the Differential Diagnosis Prognosis
In the case of neuropathic disorders, the involved fiber types A nerve that has sustained a demyelinating injury often can
and the underlying pathology can usually be determined. First, remyelinate in a very short time, usually weeks. However, if
EDX studies are more sensitive than the clinical examination there has been substantial axonal loss, whether primary or
in determining which fiber types are involved: motor, sen- secondary, the prognosis is much more guarded. The rate of
sory, or a combination of the two. Sensorimotor polyneurop- axonal regrowth is limited by the rate of slow axonal trans-
athies are common and suggest a large differential diagnosis. port, approximately 1 mm per day. Clinically, axonal loss
4 SECTION I Overview of Nerve Conduction Studies and Electromyography
testing: are they proximal, bulbar, or generalized? For instance, Box 1.2 Patient Encounter
myasthenia gravis preferentially affects oculobulbar muscles
1. Take a brief history and perform a directed physical
and then proximal muscles on EDX studies, whereas myas- examination.
thenic syndrome is a generalized disorder on EDX studies, 2. Formulate a differential diagnosis.
although clinically it has a predilection for proximal muscles. 3. Formulate a study based on the differential diagnosis.
Broadly speaking, the underlying pathology can be 4. Explain the test to the patient.
divided into presynaptic and postsynaptic disorders. EDX 5. Perform the nerve conduction studies and modify which
nerve conduction studies to add, based on the findings as
studies are usually very good at making this determination. the test proceeds.
Myasthenia gravis is the prototypic postsynaptic disorder, 6. Perform the needle electromyography study and modify
whereas myasthenic syndrome and botulism target the pre- which additional muscles to sample, based on the findings
synaptic junction. as the test proceeds.
Last is the issue of the etiology of the NMJ disorder,
whether it is acquired or inherited. Almost all NMJ disor-
ders are acquired. However, there are rare inherited NMJ always be amended as the testing proceeds. Before begin-
disorders. In some of these, there may be unique findings on ning, however, one should first explain to the patient in
EDX testing that suggest one of these rare disorders. simple terms what the test involves. Many patients are very
anxious about the examination and may have slept poorly or
not at all the night before the EDX study. Simple explana-
PATIENT ENCOUNTER tions, both before the test begins and while it is ongoing, can
Every EDX study begins with a brief history and directed greatly reduce a patient’s anxiety.
physical examination (Box 1.2). This point cannot be overem- After the test is explained to the patient, the NCSs are
phasized! Some may (incorrectly) argue that the history and performed first, followed by the needle EMG. Indeed, one
clinical examinations are not part of the EDX examination and needs the findings on the NCSs to adapt the needle EMG
that the EDX study needs to stand on its own. Nothing could strategy accordingly and to interpret the needle EMG find-
be further from the truth. One is not expected to perform the ings correctly. For instance, active denervation in the abduc-
same detailed history and physical examination that is done in tor digiti minimi (an ulnar, C8–T1 innervated muscle) has a
the office consultation setting. However, before starting every completely different interpretation depending on whether
study, the EDX physician must know some basic facts: the ulnar motor and sensory NCSs are abnormal or not
(ulnar neuropathy in the former, a radiculopathy or motor
• What are the patient’s symptoms?
neuron disease in the latter).
• How long have they been going on?
A proper balance must be maintained among obtain-
• Is there any important past medical history (e.g., diabe-
ing a thorough study, collecting the necessary information
tes, history of chemotherapy, etc.)?
to answer the clinical question, and minimizing patient dis-
• Is there muscle atrophy?
comfort. If performed correctly, nearly all NCSs and needle
• What is the muscle tone (normal, decreased, or in-
EMG can be completed within 1–1.5 hours. Rarely, a longer
creased)?
study is needed if specialized tests such as repetitive nerve
• Is there weakness, and, if so, where is it and how severe
stimulation are performed in addition to the standard stud-
is it?
ies. There clearly is a limit to what most patients can tolerate.
• What do the reflexes show (normal, decreased, or
The electromyographer should always remember the Willy
increased)?
Sutton rule concerning robbing banks: “Go where the money
• Is there any loss of sensation, and, if so, what is the dis-
is.” If there is any question as to whether a patient will toler-
tribution; what modalities are disturbed (e.g., tempera-
ate the entire examination, the study should begin with the
ture, pain, vibration, etc.)?
area of interest. For instance, in the patient with numbness
The duration, type, and distribution of symptoms, along and tingling of the fourth and fifth fingers, ulnar motor and
with the physical examination, help determine the differen- sensory studies should be done first. Likewise, needle EMG
tial diagnosis, which in turn is used to plan the EDX stud- examination of the ulnar-innervated muscles, as well as the
ies. The EDX study is planned only after the differential C8–T1 non-ulnar–innervated muscles, are of most interest
diagnosis is determined. For instance, the EDX evaluation in such a patient. Plan and consider which NCSs and needle
of a patient with slowly progressive proximal weakness is examination of which muscles should be performed first, in
very different from that of a patient with numbness and case the patient can tolerate only one or two nerve conduc-
tingling of the fourth and fifth fingers. In the former case, tions or examination of only a few muscles by EMG.
the differential diagnosis includes disorders of the anterior
horn cell, motor nerve, NMJ, or muscle. In the latter case, CARDINAL RULES OF NERVE
the differential diagnosis includes an ulnar neuropathy at its
various entrapment sites, a lower brachial plexus lesion, or CONDUCTION STUDIES AND
cervical radiculopathy. The EDX plan includes which nerves ELECTROMYOGRAPHY
and muscles to study and whether specialized tests, such as EDX studies rely on the physician’s ability to pay meticu-
repetitive nerve stimulation, may be helpful. The study can lous attention to technical details during the study while
6 SECTION I Overview of Nerve Conduction Studies and Electromyography
&DUGLQDOUXOHVRI
1&6DQG(0*
1HUYHFRQGXFWLRQVWXGLHVDQG
(0*DUHDQH[WHQVLRQRIWKH
FOLQLFDOH[DPLQDWLRQ
4XHVWLRQZKHWKHUWKHILQGLQJV
:KHQLQGRXEWWKLQNDERXW :KHQLQGRXEWUHH[DPLQH
RQWKH(';VWXG\DUHUHOHYDQW
WHFKQLFDOIDFWRUV WKHSDWLHQW
WRWKHFOLQLFDOSUREOHP
$OZD\VWKLQNDERXWWKH
FOLQLFDOHOHFWURSK\VLRORJLF
FRUUHODWLRQ
keeping in mind the bigger picture of why the study is being abnormality when none is present) and type II errors
performed. As more data are obtained, the study must be (i.e., failing to recognize an abnormality when one is
analyzed in real time and the test altered as needed. Analy- present). Although both are important, type I errors
sis of online results gives the electromyographer the oppor- are potentially more serious (e.g., the patient is labeled
tunity to modify the strategy as the testing proceeds, an with an abnormal EDX study result, such as neuropathy,
opportunity that is lost once the patient has left the labo- when the “abnormality” on the EDX testing is simply
ratory. The following cardinal rules of EDX studies should due to unrecognized technical errors). Such faulty
always be kept in mind while an EDX study is being per- diagnoses can lead to further inappropriate testing
formed (Fig. 1.6): and treatment. If there is an unexpected abnormal
EDX finding that does not fit the clinical examination,
1. NCSs and EMG are an extension of the clinical the lack of a clinical-electrophysiologic correlation
examination. NCSs and EMG cannot be performed should suggest a technical problem. For instance, if a
without a good directed clinical examination. Every routine sural nerve sensory conduction study shows an
examination must be individualized based on the absent potential but the patient has a normal sensory
patient’s symptoms and signs and the resulting examination of the lateral foot (i.e., sural territory),
differential diagnosis. If marked abnormalities are found one should suspect a technical problem (e.g., improper
on electrophysiologic testing in the same distribution electrode or stimulator placement or too low of a
where the clinical examination is normal, either the stimulus intensity). If the data are not technically
clinical examination or the electrophysiologic testing accurate, then correct data interpretation can never
must be called into question. One usually finds that occur, either at the time of the study or later by the
the better the clinical examination, the better the treating physician.
differential diagnosis, and thus, the more clearly 3. When in doubt, reexamine the patient. This is essentially
directed the EDX studies will be. an extension of cardinal rule number 1. In the example
2. When in doubt, always think about technical factors. given with rule number 2, if the sural sensory response
EDX studies rely upon collecting and amplifying is absent after all possible technical factors have been
very small bioelectric signals in the millivolt and corrected, the clinician should reexamine the patient.
microvolt range. Accomplishing this is technically If the patient has clear loss of vibration at the ankles,
demanding; many physiologic and nonphysiologic there is less concern about an absent sural sensory
factors can significantly interfere with the accuracy response. If the patient’s sensory examination is normal
of the data. Accurate NCSs and EMG depend on on reexamination, the absent sensory response does not
intact equipment (e.g., EMG machine, electrodes, fit the clinical findings, and technical factors should be
and stimulator), and on correct performance of the investigated further.
study by the electromyographer. Technical problems 4. EDX findings should be reported in the context of
can easily lead to absent or abnormal findings. Failure the clinical symptoms and the referring diagnosis. In
to recognize technical factors that influence the EDX every study, electrophysiologic abnormalities must be
study can result in type I errors (i.e., diagnosing an correlated with the clinical deficit.
Chapter 1 • Approach to Nerve Conduction Studies, Electromyography, and Neuromuscular Ultrasound 7
Because electrophysiologic studies are quite sensitive, it If all three results fit together, the diagnosis is secure.
is not uncommon for the electromyographer to discover However, if the NCSs and EMG findings do not fit together
mild, subclinical deficits of which the patient may not and, more importantly, if they do not correlate with the
be aware. For example, a diabetic patient referred to clinical findings, the significance of any electrical abnormali-
the EMG laboratory for polyneuropathy may show ties should be seriously questioned. Consider a patient with
electrophysiologic evidence of a superimposed ulnar pain in the arm who has an otherwise normal history and
neuropathy but have no symptoms of such. Accordingly, examination. If the NCSs are normal except for a low ulnar
the electromyographer should always report any sensory potential and the EMG demonstrates only mild rein-
electrophysiologic abnormality in the context of its nervation of the biceps, one should be reluctant to interpret
clinical relevance so that it can be properly interpreted. the study as showing a combination of an ulnar neuropathy
5. When in doubt, do not overcall a diagnosis. Because and a C5 radiculopathy. These mild abnormalities, which
electrophysiologic tests are very sensitive, mild, are not substantiated by other electrophysiologic findings
subclinical, and sometimes clinically insignificant and do not have clear clinical correlates, may have little to
findings often appear on EDX testing. This occurs do with the patient’s pain. In such a case, the patient should
partly because of the wide range of normal values, be reexamined. If no clinical correlate is found, the studies
which vary with the nerve and muscle being tested. should be rechecked. If the abnormalities persist, they may
In addition, there are a variety of physiologic and be noted as part of the impression but interpreted as being
nonphysiologic factors that may alter the results of both of uncertain clinical significance.
NCSs and EMG, despite attempts to control for them. When performed properly, NCSs and EMG can be very
These factors, often when combined, may create minor helpful to the referring physician. However, the limitations
abnormalities. Such minor abnormalities should not of EDX studies must be appreciated, technical factors well
be deemed relevant unless they correlate with other controlled, and a good differential diagnosis established
electrophysiologic findings and, most importantly, with before each study. Otherwise, the study may actually do a
the clinical history and examination. It is a mistake to disservice to the patient and to the referring physician by
overcall an electrophysiologic diagnosis based on minor leading them astray by way of minor, irrelevant, or techni-
abnormalities or on findings that do not fit together cally induced “abnormalities.” If the cardinal rules of NCSs
well. Sometimes, the clinical or electrophysiologic and EMG are kept in mind, EDX studies are far more likely
diagnosis is not clear-cut and a definite diagnosis to be of help to the referring clinician and the patient with
cannot be reached. Occasionally, NCSs and EMG are a neuromuscular disorder.
clearly and definitely abnormal, but a precise diagnosis
still cannot be determined. For example, consider
the patient whose clinical history and examination NEUROMUSCULAR ULTRASOUND
suggest an ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. The EDX Over the last several years, neuromuscular U/S has increas-
study often demonstrates abnormalities of the ulnar ingly been used along with EDX studies in the evaluation
nerve in the absence of any localizing findings, such as of patients with various neuromuscular conditions. The use
conduction block or slowing across the elbow. Although of neuromuscular U/S has grown due to a combination of
the referring surgeon usually wants to know whether several factors, including the marked improvement of the
the ulnar neuropathy is at the elbow, often, the only resolution and software of U/S machines while the physi-
accurate impression that the electromyographer can cal size and cost of the machines have gone down. These
give is one of a non-localizable ulnar neuropathy that is smaller, portable machines can easily be used and shared
at, or proximal to, the most proximal abnormal ulnar- among EDX laboratory rooms. Indeed, some manufacturers
innervated muscle found on EMG. are working on combined EDX and U/S machines housed in
6. Always think about the clinical-electrophysiologic one unit. Hundreds of peer-reviewed articles on the useful-
correlation. This rule combines all of the earlier rules. ness of neuromuscular U/S are published each year. Thus,
One usually can be certain of a diagnosis when the neuromuscular U/S has become a validated, reliable, and
clinical findings, NCSs, and EMG abnormalities all important tool in the evaluation of many neuromuscular
correlate well. Consider again the example of the disorders.
patient with weakness of the hand and tingling and Physicians who perform EDX studies are best suited to
numbness of the fourth and fifth fingers. If NCSs learn and perform neuromuscular U/S, which is the study
demonstrate abnormal ulnar motor and sensory of peripheral nerves and muscles. Neuromuscular U/S dif-
potentials associated with slowing across the elbow, fers from vascular U/S and musculoskeletal U/S, although
and the needle EMG shows denervation and reduced there is some overlap. It is essential to emphasize that neuro-
numbers of motor unit potentials in all ulnar- muscular U/S is complementary to EDX studies; it does not
innervated muscles and a normal EMG of all non- replace EDX studies. The situation is similar to the role that
ulnar–innervated muscles, there is a high degree of EDX studies and MRI have in the evaluation of radiculopa-
certainty that the patient truly has an ulnar neuropathy thy. EDX studies are physiologic tests and, as such, yield
at the elbow, and the electrophysiologic abnormalities information about the function of the nerves, nerve roots,
are indeed relevant. and muscles. In contrast, imaging studies show a picture of
8 SECTION I Overview of Nerve Conduction Studies and Electromyography
the nerves, nerve roots, and muscles, but yield no informa- its origin in the lower brachial plexus and assess for struc-
tion on the functioning. Thus, for example, whereas EDX tural abnormalities to localize the lesion.
studies give information about how well the nerve root is Regardless of whether the EDX study can definitely
functioning, an MRI can show the nerve roots and whether localize the mononeuropathy or not, it is important to know
they appear impinged by a disk, spondylosis, or other struc- what is causing it. Is it an entrapment from wear and tear?
tural causes. Likewise, whereas EDX studies may be able Or from tenosynovitis? Or from compression from a gan-
to identify an ulnar neuropathy at the elbow, they cannot glion cyst? Or from a nerve sheath tumor? And the list con-
discern what is causing it. This is where neuromuscular U/S tinues. This is also where U/S may add critical anatomic
may add critical complementary information to the EDX information about what is causing the mononeuropathy.
studies. For example, it may reveal bony spurs and excess Performing U/S after EDX studies for a mononeuropa-
callus in the ulnar groove from tardy ulnar palsy, compres- thy may result in three different outcomes:
sion of the ulnar nerve in the true cubital tunnel under
1. It may add no useful information, or
the humeral-ulnar aponeurosis, or in some cases a synovial
2. It may add important complementary information, or
cyst compressing the ulnar nerve, among many possible
3. It may be the key to the case.
etiologies.
Best used, neuromuscular U/S serves as an extension of Unfortunately, one does not know before doing the U/S
the clinical examination and most often of the EDX studies, study which of these three outcomes will be the result.
and should be used as such. Chapters 17, 18, and 19 discuss Thus, one can make a strong argument that U/S is a reason-
neuromuscular U/S in greater detail. In addition, many of able adjunct to EDX studies for most mononeuropathies.
the later clinical chapters expand on the usefulness of neu-
romuscular U/S in specific conditions.
Similar to EDX studies, there are several general princi- Peripheral Nerve: Polyneuropathy
ples of neuromuscular U/S. Each neuromuscular U/S study The role of neuromuscular U/S in polyneuropathy is most
must be individualized, based on the neurologic examina- useful when looking for evidence of a hypertrophic (usu-
tion, the EDX study, and the differential diagnosis, and ally meaning demyelinating) polyneuropathy. As will be dis-
modified as the study progresses and further information cussed in Chapter 29 on Polyneuropathy, the vast majority
is gained. Its primary use is to add anatomic and pathologic of polyneuropathies display an axonal loss pattern on EDX
information that complements the EDX study. Among neu- studies. Very few are primarily demyelinating. However,
romuscular U/S’s many potential uses, the major ones are the presence of demyelination on EDX studies of a poly-
described in the following sections. neuropathy is a critical piece of information, as it mark-
edly narrows the differential diagnosis. Furthermore, in the
case of acquired demyelinating polyneuropathies, most are
Peripheral Nerve: Mononeuropathy inflammatory (autoimmune) and potentially very treatable.
In general, U/S is particularly helpful in many mononeu- The U/S picture of a chronic demyelinating polyneu-
ropathies. Mononeuropathies are commonly caused by ropathy is usually that of a hypertrophic neuropathy (from
entrapment, trauma, and in some cases other structural repeated demyelination and remyelination, Schwann cell
causes. When the EDX study has localized the problem to proliferation, and onion blub formation). EDX studies may
one segment of one peripheral nerve (e.g., the median nerve be indeterminate in some chronic demyelinating neuropa-
at the carpal tunnel), U/S can confirm the localization by thies. Sometimes, this is due to responses being absent. In
revealing structural changes in the nerve at the involved site. others, the EDX criteria for demyelination are not fully
In the case of carpal tunnel syndrome, U/S usually simply met, or the conduction velocities are in the borderline range
adds additional confirmatory evidence of the nerve loca- between axon loss and demyelination. In these cases, pre-
tion, although as we will see later in Chapter 20 on Median sumably the demyelination is not marked enough to call,
Neuropathy at the Wrist, U/S may add more information, or the segments of nerve that are demyelinated are not eas-
especially in postoperative cases or when symptoms recur. ily assessed by standard EDX studies (e.g., very proximal
In other cases of mononeuropathy, when the EDX study nerves, plexus, and/or roots). Hence, U/S can be extremely
localizes the problem to one nerve but is not able to local- useful in establishing a polyneuropathy as demyelinating.
ize a specific segment, U/S can be particularly useful. This
occurs when the pathophysiology is that of axonal loss. In
this situation, U/S is particularly helpful as it can often Motor Neuron Disease
localize the lesion more precisely than EDX studies. Take EDX studies in conjunction with the history and physi-
the example of the patient with a weak grip and numbness cal examination are the cornerstones of diagnosing motor
involving digit 5. An ulnar neuropathy is considered most neuron disease. U/S has a limited role in the diagnosis of
likely. The EDX study might show abnormalities limited to motor neuron disease, with a couple of notable exceptions.
the ulnar nerve, but there is no slowing or conduction block First, U/S is extremely good at detecting fasciculations—
across the elbow. Is the lesion at the elbow? Or is it as the better than the clinical examination and needle EMG. The
wrist, in the forearm, upper arm, or in the lower brachial research criteria for the diagnosis of motor neuron disease
plexus? U/S can visualize the ulnar nerve from the wrist to (and qualification for clinical studies) requires evidence of
Chapter 1 • Approach to Nerve Conduction Studies, Electromyography, and Neuromuscular Ultrasound 9
to the lesion with passive range of motion, or during normal EMG of all non-ulnar–innervated muscles,
voluntary contraction of nearby muscles. Take lots of and the U/S shows an enlarged, hypoechoic ulnar
still pictures and movie clips, all of which will help you nerve under the humeral-ulnar aponeurosis at the true
later in making your determination. cubital tunnel without any other pathology; there is
4. When in doubt, think about technical factors, artifacts, a very high degree of certainty that the patient truly
and anomalies. U/S has its own set of artifacts and has an ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. In this case, the
technical factors (see Chapter 17). If not recognized, electrophysiological abnormalities are indeed relevant,
these can lead to the mistaken impression of pathology with the U/S demonstrating the etiology of the ulnar
when none actually exists. Similar to EDX studies, such nerve entrapment at the cubital tunnel.
faulty diagnoses can lead to inappropriate testing and
treatment. In addition, when performing U/S, it is not
uncommon to encounter anatomic anomalies of nerve, Suggested Readings
muscle, and blood vessel. One quickly appreciates that Cocito D, Tavella A, Ciaramitaro P, Costa P, Poglio
every patient’s anatomy does not necessarily follow the F, Paolasso I, et al. A further critical evaluation of
textbook. Sometimes, these anatomic anomalies are requests for electrodiagnostic examinations. Neurol Sci.
2006;26(6):419–422.
actually the cause of the patient’s problem; in other
Haig AJ, Tzeng HM, LeBreck DB. The value of
cases, they are simply incidental findings.
electrodiagnostic consultation for patients with upper
5. When in doubt, do not overcall a diagnosis. This general extremity nerve complaints: a prospective comparison
rule is equally applicable to EDX studies and all other with the history and physical examination. Arch Phys Med
laboratory and radiographic tests. It is not uncommon Rehabil. 1999;80(10):1273–1281.
to find minor abnormalities of unclear significance or to Kothari MJ, Blakeslee MA, Reichwein R, Simmons Z, Logigian
misinterpret technical issues as findings. It is a mistake EL. Electrodiagnostic studies: are they useful in clinical
to overcall any diagnosis based on minor abnormalities practice? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(12):1510–1511.
or findings that do not fit together with the clinical Kothari MJ, Preston DC, Plotkin GM, Venkatesh S,
presentation. Shefner JM, Logigian EL. Electromyography: do the
6. Always think about the clinical-electrophysiologic- diagnostic ends justify the means? Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
1995;76(10):947–949.
ultrasound correlation. This is simply an extension
Lindstrom H, Ashworth NL. The usefulness of
of the final cardinal rule of EDX. One usually can electrodiagnostic studies in the diagnosis and
be certain of a diagnosis when the clinical findings, management of neuromuscular disorders. Muscle Nerve.
NCSs, EMG, and U/S abnormalities all correlate 2018;58(2):191–196.
well. Consider again the example of the patient with Mondelli M, Aretini A, Greco G. Requests of
weakness of the hand and tingling and numbness of electrodiagnostic testing: consistency and agreement of
the fourth and fifth fingers. If NCSs demonstrate referral diagnosis. What is changed in a primary outpatient
abnormal ulnar motor and sensory potentials associated EDX lab 16 years later? Neurol Sci. 2014;35(5):669–675.
with slowing across the elbow, the needle EMG Mondelli M, Giacchi M, Federico A. Requests for
shows denervation and a reduced number of motor electromyography from general practitioners and specialists:
critical evaluation. Ital J Neurol Sci. 1998;19(4):195–203.
unit potentials in all ulnar-innervated muscles and a
SECTION I • Overview of Nerve Conduction Studies and Electromyography
'RUVDOURRW
JDQJOLRQ
6HQVRU\
UHFHSWRU
11
12 SECTION I Overview of Nerve Conduction Studies and Electromyography
lie outside the spinal cord, this results in a different pattern motor and sensory fibers. The dorsal ramus runs posteriorly
of sensory nerve conduction abnormalities, depending on to supply sensory innervation to the skin over the spine and
whether the lesion is in the peripheral nerve or proximal to muscular innervation to the paraspinal muscles at that seg-
the DRG at the root level (see Chapter 3). ment. The ventral ramus differs, depending on the segment
Motor and sensory roots at each spinal level unite distal within the body. In the thoracic region, each ventral ramus
to the DRG to become a mixed spinal nerve. There are 31 continues as an intercostal nerve. In the lower cervical to
pairs of spinal nerves (8 cervical, 12 thoracic, 5 lumbar, 5 upper thoracic (C5–T1) region, the ventral rami unite to
sacral, 1 coccygeal; Fig. 2.2). Each spinal nerve divides into form the brachial plexus (Fig. 2.4). In the mid-lumbar to
a dorsal and ventral ramus (Fig. 2.3). Unlike the dorsal and sacral regions, the ventral rami intermix to form the lumbo-
ventral nerve roots, the dorsal and ventral rami both contain sacral plexus (Fig. 2.5).
Within each plexus, motor and sensory fibers from dif-
& ferent nerve roots intermix to ultimately form individual
, & , peripheral nerves. Each peripheral nerve generally sup-
,, ,,
plies muscular innervation to several muscles and cutane-
,,,
,,, ous sensation to a specific area of skin, as well as sensory
,;
,9 innervation to underlying deep structures. Because of this
;
9 arrangement, motor fibers from the same nerve root sup-
;,
9, ply muscles innervated by different peripheral nerves, and
7 ;,,
9,, sensory fibers from the same nerve root supply cutane-
7
7
7 ous sensation in the distribution of different peripheral
,,
,, nerves. For instance, the C5 motor root supplies the biceps
,,,
(musculocutaneous nerve), deltoid (axillary nerve), and
,,, ,9
brachioradialis (radial nerve), among other muscles (Fig.
9
,9
2.6). Similarly, C5 sensory fibers innervate the lateral arm
9, (axillary nerve) and forearm (lateral antebrachial cutaneous
9
9,, sensory nerve), in addition to other nerves.
9, 9,,, All muscles supplied by one spinal segment (i.e., one
nerve root) are known as a myotome, whereas all cutaneous
9,, ,;
9,,, ;
6HQVRU\
,; ;,
/ URRW
;
;,, 'RUVDOURRW
;, 'RUVDO JDQJOLRQ
/ UDPXV
;,,
/
/
,,
9HQWUDO 6SLQDO
,, UDPXV QHUYH
,,,
,,, 0RWRU $QWHULRU
,9 URRW KRUQFHOO
,9
9
9
6
,QWHUFRVWDO
QHUYH
&RF Fig. 2.3 Nerve roots and rami. The motor root, originating from
anterior horn cells, leaves the cord ventrally, whereas the sensory root
Fig. 2.2 Spinal cord and nerve roots. The spinal cord is divided into enters the cord on the dorsal side. Immediately distal to the dorsal root
31 segments (8 cervical, 12 thoracic, 5 lumbar, 5 sacral, and 1 coccy- ganglion, the motor and sensory roots come together to form the spinal
geal). At each segment, motor and sensory fibers leave the spinal cord nerve. Each spinal nerve quickly divides into a dorsal and ventral
as nerve roots before exiting the bony spinal column. In the adult, the ramus. Each ramus contains both motor and sensory fibers. The dorsal
spinal cord usually ends at the level of the L1 vertebra. Consequently, rami supply sensation to the skin over the spine and muscular innerva-
below this level, only the lumbosacral nerve roots, known as the tion to the paraspinal muscles. The ventral rami continue as intercostal
cauda equina, are present within the spinal column. (From Haymaker nerves in the thoracic region. In the lower cervical region, the ventral
W, Woodhall B. Peripheral Nerve Injuries. Philadelphia: WB Saun- rami fuse to form the brachial plexus. In the mid-lumbar through sacral
ders; 1953, with permission.) segments, the ventral rami intermix to form the lumbosacral plexus.
Chapter 2 • Anatomy and Neurophysiology for Electrodiagnostic Studies 13
areas supplied by a single spinal segment are known as a nerve occurs where the nerve roots meet the spinal cord,
dermatome (Fig. 2.7). For both myotomes and dermatomes, where the nerve can sustain only 2–3 kg of force. For this
there is considerable overlap between adjacent segments. reason, nerve root avulsion may occur after a significant
Because of the high degree of overlap between spinal seg- trauma and especially after a stretch injury.
ments, a single root lesion seldom results in significant sen- Analogous to nerve fibers, muscle fibers have a very
sory loss and never in anesthesia. Likewise, on the motor similar arrangement at the microscopic level with three
side, even a severe single nerve root lesion usually results layers of connective tissue: the epimysium, perimysium,
in only mild or moderate weakness and never in paralysis. and endomysium (Fig. 2.9). The epimysium surrounds
For instance, a severe lesion of the C6 motor root causes the entire muscle. Within the epimysium, muscle fibers
weakness of the biceps; however, paralysis would not (which are the actual muscle cells) are grouped into fas-
occur because C5 motor fibers also innervate the biceps. cicles surrounded by the perimysium. The final layer of
In contrast, a severe peripheral nerve lesion usually results connective tissue, the endomysium, is present between
in marked sensory and motor deficits because contribu- individual muscle fibers. Muscle fibers are cylindrical and
tions from several myotomes and dermatomes are affected contain the actual muscle fibrils: the structural proteins
simultaneously. that are responsible for muscle contraction. When muscle
At the microscopic level, nerve fibers are protected by contraction occurs, the force is transmitted most often to
three different layers of connective tissue: the epineurium, a bone to move a joint (occasionally, muscle is connected
perineurium, and endoneurium (Fig. 2.8). The thick epineu- to other connective tissue or the skin). This connection
rium surrounds the entire nerve and is in continuity with the is most often made by way of a tendon, which is a thick
dura mater at the spinal cord level. Within the epineurium, rope-like piece of connective tissue that is in continuity
axons are grouped into fascicles, surrounded by perineu- with the epimysium of the muscle. In some muscles, the
rium. A final layer of connective tissue, the endoneurium, is contraction is by way of an aponeurosis, which is a large,
present between individual axons. Effectively, a blood-nerve sheet-like piece of connective tissue. Most muscles have
barrier is formed by the combination of vascular endothe- two tendons, one at their origin (typically proximal and
lium supplying the nerve and the connective tissue of the more static) and one at their insertion (typically more
perineurium. Together, the three layers of connective tissue distal and more mobile). In some muscles, the tendon
give peripheral nerve considerable tensile strength, usually originates from inside the muscle, known as an internal or
in the range of 20–30 kg. However, the weakest point of a central tendon.
'RUVDO
VFDSXODU
&
8SS
& HU 6XSUDVFDSXODU
3R $Q
WHU
LRU
VWH
ULRU
&
WHU
DO
0HGLDQ
0HGLDO
SHFWRUDO Fig. 2.4 Brachial plexus. The ventral rami of
8OQDU the C5–T1 nerve roots intermix to form the
0HGLDO brachial plexus between the neck and shoul-
EUDFKLDO 7KRUDFRGRUVDO der. From the brachial plexus, the major upper
FXWDQHRXV extremity peripheral nerves are derived. (From
0HGLDO Hollinshead WH. Anatomy for Surgeons, Vol-
DQWHEUDFKLDO ume 2: The Back and Limbs. New York: Harper
FXWDQHRXV & Row; 1969, with permission.)
14 SECTION I Overview of Nerve Conduction Studies and Electromyography
'RUVDOVFDSXODUQHUYH
5KRPERLGV
&
/ 6XSUDVFDSXODUQHUYH
6XSUDVSLQDWXV
,QIUDVSLQDWXV
/ &
$[LOODU\QHUYH
'HOWRLG
,OLRK\SRJDVWULFQHUYH
/ 7HUHVPLQRU
,OLRLQJXLQDOQHUYH
/RQJWKRUDFLFQHUYH
/ 6HUUDWXVDQWHULRU
/DWHUDOFXWDQHRXVQHUYH
RIWKLJK
6XEVFDSXODUQHUYH
/
7HUHVPDMRU
*HQLWRIHPRUDOQHUYH 6XEVFDSXODULV
6
)HPRUDOQHUYH /DWHUDOSHFWRUDOQHUYH
6
3HFWRUDOLVPDMRU
2EWXUDWRUQHUYH
6 5DGLDOQHUYH
%UDFKLRUDGLDOLV
6XSHULRUJOXWHDOQHUYH 6 6XSLQDWRU
0XVFXORFXWDQHRXVQHUYH
,QIHULRUJOXWHDOQHUYH %LFHSV
Fig. 2.6 Myotomal and peripheral nerve innervation. Motor fibers
from one nerve root, a myotome, supply muscles innervated by
3XGHQGDOQHUYH
different peripheral nerves. For example, the C5 motor root supplies
the biceps (musculocutaneous nerve), deltoid (axillary nerve), and
6FLDWLFQHUYH brachioradialis (radial nerve), among other muscles. (Adapted from
Haymaker W, Woodhall B. Peripheral Nerve Injuries. Philadelphia:
WB Saunders; 1953, with permission.)
3RVWHULRUFXWDQHRXV
QHUYHRIWKLJK
and cations). The membrane is always impermeable to large
negatively charged anions, and it is relatively impermeable
to sodium in the resting state. This semipermeable mem-
Fig. 2.5 Lumbosacral plexus. The L1–S4 nerve roots intermix in
brane, in conjunction with an active Na+/K+ pump that
the pelvis to form the lumbosacral plexus. From this plexus, the moves sodium outside in exchange for potassium, leads to
individual major peripheral nerves of the lower extremity are derived. concentration gradients across the membrane. The concen-
(From Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation. Clinical Examinations in tration of sodium is larger outside the membrane, whereas
Neurology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1956, with permission.) the concentration of potassium and larger anions is greater
inside. The combination of these electrical and chemical
gradients results in forces that create a resting equilibrium
PHYSIOLOGY potential. At the nerve cell soma, this resting membrane
The primary role of nerve is to transmit information reli- potential is approximately 70 mV negative inside compared
ably from the anterior horn cells to muscles for the motor with the outside; distally in the axon it is approximately 90
system and from the sensory receptors to the spinal cord mV negative.
for the sensory system. Although functionally nerves may The membrane of the axon is lined with voltage-gated
seem similar to electrical wires, there are vast differences sodium channels (Fig. 2.11). These structures are essen-
between the two. At the molecular level, a complex set of tially molecular pores with gates that open and close. For
chemical and electrical events allows nerve to propagate an many ion channels, gates open in response to molecules
electrical signal. that bind to the channel. In the case of the voltage-gated
The axonal membrane of every nerve is electrically sodium channel, the gate is controlled by a voltage sensor
active. This property results from a combination of a spe- that responds to the level of the membrane potential. If cur-
cialized membrane and the sodium/potassium (Na+/K+) rent is injected into the axon, depolarization occurs (i.e.,
pump (Fig. 2.10). The specialized axonal membrane is the axon becomes more positive internally). Voltage sensors
semipermeable to electrically charged molecules (anions within the sodium channel respond to the depolarization by
Chapter 2 • Anatomy and Neurophysiology for Electrodiagnostic Studies 15
& /
7
&
& 7 /
7 6
7 6
6
7 7
7 7 /
/
& 7 6
7 7
7 6
7 6 /
&
7 /
7
&
7
& /
7 6
/
/
&
/
& / 6
7 &
7
7
7 6
7
7
7 &
7 6 / /
7
7
7 &
7
7
&
/
&
Fig. 2.7 Dermatomes. The cutaneous area supplied from one spinal segment (i.e., one sensory nerve root) is known as a dermatome. Despite
the apparent simplicity of dermatomal charts, in actuality there is a wide overlap of adjacent dermatomes. Consequently, a nerve root lesion,
even if severe, never results in anesthesia but rather results in altered or decreased sensation. (From O’Brien MD. Aids to the Examination of the
Peripheral Nervous System. London: Baillière Tindall; 1986.)
Fig. 2.10 Resting membrane potential. At rest, the axonal mem-
brane is negatively polarized inside compared to outside. This
Epimysium Perimysium Endomysium resting potential results from the combination of a membrane that is
semipermeable to charged particles and an active Na+/K+ pump. At
Fig. 2.9 Internal muscle anatomy. The endomysium is present rest, the concentration of Na+ and Cl− is higher in the extracellular
between muscle fibers. Muscle fibers are grouped into fascicles, space, with the concentration of K+ and large anions (A−) greater
surrounded by perimysium. Surrounding the entire muscle is the last inside the axon.
layer of connective tissue, the epimysium.
Na+
$ % &
Na+
Fig. 2.11 Voltage-gated sodium channel. The axonal membrane is lined with voltage-gated sodium channels. These channels are molecular
pores with gates that open and close; when open, gates are selective for sodium. (A) There are two gates: an activation gate (large arrow) and an
inactivation gate (small arrow). (B) If current is injected into the axon, depolarization occurs and the voltage-gated activation gate opens, allow-
ing the influx of sodium into the axon, driven both by concentration and electrical gradients. However, the opening of the sodium channels is
time limited. Inactivation of the sodium channel occurs within 1–2 ms. (C) The inactivation gate of the sodium channel has been modeled as a
“hinged lid,” which closes the end of the channel within 1–2 ms of depolarization, preventing further depolarization.
opening the gate to the channel and allowing sodium to rush nerve behind the depolarization is refractory when the area
into the axon, driven both by concentration and by electrical ahead is not so that the impulse will continue forward and
gradients. Every time a depolarization of 10–30 mV above will not return backward).
the resting membrane potential occurs (i.e., threshold), it In addition to sodium channel inactivation, depolariza-
creates an action potential and a cycle of positive feedback; tion also results in the opening of potassium channels, which
further depolarization occurs and more sodium channels also then drives the membrane voltage in a more negative
open (Fig. 2.12). Action potentials are always all-or-none direction. These factors, along with the Na+/K+ pump,
responses that then propagate away from the initial site of then reestablish the resting membrane potential.
depolarization. The axon does not remain depolarized for The conduction velocity of the action potential depends
long, however, because the opening of the sodium channels on the diameter of the axon: the larger the axon, the less
is time limited. Sodium channels have a second gate, known resistance and the faster the conduction velocity. For typi-
as the inactivation gate. Inactivation of the sodium channel cal unmyelinated axons, the conduction velocity of an
occurs within 1–2 ms. During this time, the membrane is action potential is very slow, typically in the range of 0.2–
not excitable and cannot be opened (i.e., refractory period). 1.5 m/s. Conduction velocity can be greatly increased with
The inactivation gate of the sodium channel has been mod- the addition of myelin. Myelin insulation is present on all
eled as a “hinged lid.” From a practical point of view, the fast-conducting fibers and is derived from Schwann cells,
refractory period limits the frequency that nerves can con- the major supporting cells in the peripheral nervous sys-
duct impulses. It also ensures that the action potential con- tem. Myelin is composed of concentric spirals of Schwann
tinues to propagate in the same direction (i.e., the area of cell membrane (Fig. 2.13). For every myelinated fiber,
Chapter 2 • Anatomy and Neurophysiology for Electrodiagnostic Studies 17
9P
J1D
J.
Fig. 2.12 Action potential. When the resting membrane voltage (Vm)
is depolarized to threshold, voltage-gated sodium channels are opened,
increasing Na+ conductance (gNa), resulting in an influx of sodium and
further depolarization. The action potential, however, is short lived,
due to the inactivation of the sodium channels within 1–2 ms and an
increase in K+ conductance (gK). These changes, along with the Na+/K+
pump, allow the axon to reestablish the resting membrane potential.
0\HOLQ
into many twigs, each of which goes to an individual muscle NMJ is essentially an electrical- chemical-
electrical link
fiber. An axon, along with its anterior horn cell and all mus- from nerve to muscle. It is formed from two specialized
cle fibers with which it is connected, is known as a motor membranes, one on nerve and one on muscle, separated by
unit (Fig. 2.16). Depolarization of all the muscle fibers in a thin synaptic cleft (Fig. 2.17). As a nerve action poten-
a motor unit creates an electrical potential known as the tial travels to the presynaptic side of the NMJ, voltage-
motor unit action potential (MUAP). Analysis of MUAPs gated calcium channels are activated, allowing an influx
is an important part of every needle EMG examination. of calcium (Ca+). Increasing Ca+ concentration results in
When an action potential is generated, all muscle fibers in a series of enzymatic steps that ultimately results in the
the motor unit are normally activated, again an all-or-none release of acetylcholine, the neurotransmitter at the NMJ.
response. Acetylcholine diffuses across the synaptic cleft to bind to
However, before a muscle fiber can be activated, the specialized acetylcholine receptors on the muscle mem-
nerve action potential must be carried across the NMJ. The brane. These receptors, when activated, allow an influx of
$ % &
/DWHQF\ VHF
'LVWDQFH PP
Fig. 2.15 Demonstration of saltatory conduction. Recording of a normal single fiber from an intact ventral root in a rat. (A) Successive records
of external longitudinal current recorded from a single fiber as electrodes were moved along a ventral root in steps of 0–2 mm. (B) Lines from
each record indicate positions of electrodes with respect to underlying nodes and internodes. (C) Latency to peak of external longitudinal current
as a function of distance. Note how the distance/latency graph is a “staircase” configuration. As current proceeds down a normal myelinated
axon, the latency (i.e., the conduction time) abruptly increases approximately every 1.0–1.5 mm. This is the depolarization time at the nodes of
Ranvier. Conversely, note the flat part of the staircase graph; here the latency stays almost exactly the same despite a change in distance. This is
the saltatory conduction jumping from node to node. (From Rasminsky M, Sears TA. Internodal conduction in undissected demyelinated nerve
fibres. J Physiol. 1972;227:323–350, with permission.)
MUAP
Fig. 2.16 Motor unit. The motor unit is defined as one axon, its anterior horn cell, and all connected muscle fibers and neuromuscular junc-
tions. A nerve fiber action potential normally always results in depolarization of all the muscle fibers of the motor unit, creating an electrical
potential known as the motor unit action potential (MUAP). Analysis of MUAPs is a large part of the needle electromyographic examination.
Chapter 2 • Anatomy and Neurophysiology for Electrodiagnostic Studies 19
sodium and depolarization of the muscle fiber. As is the the following attributes: (1) myelinated or unmyelinated,
case with nerve, once threshold is reached, a muscle fiber (2) somatic or autonomic, (3) motor or sensory, and (4)
action potential is created that spreads throughout the diameter.
muscle fiber. Following the muscle fiber action potential, There are several important points to glean from
a complex set of molecular interactions occurs within the Table 2.1, some of which are directly relevant to clinical
muscle fiber, resulting in increasing overlap of the major EDX testing. First is the direct relationship between fiber
muscle fiber filaments: actin and myosin, with the final diameter and conduction velocity: the larger the diameter,
result of muscle shortening, contraction, and generation of the faster the conduction velocity. The large myelinated
force (Fig. 2.18). fibers are the fibers that are measured in clinical NCSs.
Indeed, all routine motor and sensory conduction velocity
and latency measurements are from the largest and fast-
CLASSIFICATION est fibers of the particular peripheral nerve that is being
Multiple peripheral nerve classification schemes exist studied. Large-diameter fibers have the most myelin and
(Table 2.1). Peripheral nerves can be classified based on the least electrical resistance, both of which result in faster
conduction velocities. The small myelinated (Aδ, B) and
unmyelinated (C) fibers carry autonomic information
(afferent and efferent) and somatic pain and temperature
sensations. These fibers are not recorded with standard
nerve conduction techniques. Thus, neuropathies that
'LVWDOQHUYH preferentially affect only small fibers may not reveal any
abnormalities on NCSs.
Second, routine sensory conduction studies typically
record cutaneous nerves innervating skin. The largest and
fastest cutaneous fibers are the Aβ fibers from hair and
3UHV\QDSWLFWHUPLQDO
skin follicles. Note that the size and conduction velocities
of these fibers are similar to those of the muscle efferent
0LWRFKRQGULD fibers from the anterior horn cells that are recorded during
routine motor studies. These myelinated fibers have veloci-
$FHW\OFKROLQHTXDQWD ties in the range of 35–75 m/s.
6\QDSWLFFOHIW
Third, the largest and fastest fibers in the peripheral
$FHW\OFKROLQHUHFHSWRUV
nervous system are not recorded during either routine
motor or sensory NCSs. These are the muscle afferents,
-XQFWLRQDOIROGV the Aα fibers (also known as Ia fibers), which originate
from muscle spindles and mediate the afferent arc of
3RVWV\QDSWLFPHPEUDQH
the muscle stretch reflex. These fibers are recorded only
PXVFOH
during mixed nerve studies in which the entire mixed
Fig. 2.17 Neuromuscular junction. The neuromuscular junction is
a specialized junction between the terminal axon and muscle fiber. nerve is stimulated and recorded. Therefore mixed
When the nerve action potential invades the presynaptic terminal, nerve conduction velocities usually are faster than either
acetylcholine is released and diffuses across the synaptic cleft to routine motor or cutaneous sensory conduction veloci-
bind to acetylcholine receptors on the muscle membrane. This bind- ties because they contain these Ia fibers. Because the
ing results in a muscle endplate potential, which, once threshold is
reached, causes the generation of a muscle fiber action potential.
Ia fibers have the largest diameter and accordingly the
Z Myosin Z
Actin
Cross bridging
Fig. 2.18 Actin and myosin. Following a muscle fiber action potential, muscle contraction results from a complex set of molecular interactions,
ultimately ending with the overlapping of two interlacing muscle proteins, actin and myosin. This overlap, which occurs along with the forma-
tion of energy-dependent cross-bridges, effectively results in shortening of the muscle and the generation of force. Actin filaments are connected
by Z lines (Z). The sarcomere, a unit of muscle, is defined from one Z line to the next. The overlapping pattern of actin and myosin filaments
gives muscle its striated appearance.
20 SECTION I Overview of Nerve Conduction Studies and Electromyography
greatest amount of myelin, they often are affected early source (i.e., the action potential). With near-field poten-
by demyelinating lesions such as those found in entrap- tials, a response generally is not seen until the source is
ment neuropathies. For example, in the EDX evaluation close to the recording electrodes. The closer the recording
of carpal tunnel syndrome, the mixed nerve study from electrodes are to the current source, the higher the ampli-
the palm to the wrist often is more sensitive in detecting tude. Compound muscle action potentials, sensory nerve
abnormalities than either the routine motor or sensory action potentials, and MUAPs recorded during routine
conduction study. motor conduction, sensory conduction, and needle EMG
studies, respectively, are essentially all volume-conducted
near-field potentials.
RECORDING Volume- conducted, near- field potentials produce a
All potentials obtained during NCSs and needle EMG characteristic triphasic waveform as an advancing action
result from the extracellular recording of intracellular potential approaches and then passes beneath and away
events from either nerve or muscle. NCSs usually are per- from a recording electrode (Fig. 2.19, top). In practice,
formed by recording with surface electrodes over the skin, most sensory and mixed nerve studies display this tri-
and EMG potentials by recording with a needle electrode phasic waveform morphology, as do fibrillation potentials
placed within the muscle. In both procedures, intracellu- and most MUAPs. The electrical correlate of an action
lar electrical potentials are transmitted through tissue to potential traveling toward, under, and then away from the
the recording electrodes. The process of an intracellular recording electrode is an initial positive phase, followed by
electrical potential being transmitted through extracellular a negative phase, and then a trailing positive phase, respec-
fluid and tissue is known as volume conduction. Although tively. The first positive peak represents the time that the
the theory of volume conduction is complex and beyond action potential is first beneath the active electrode; this is
the scope of this text, volume-conducted potentials can be the point at which the onset latency should be measured
modeled as either near-field or far-field potentials. Near- for nerve action potentials. The initial positive peak may
field potentials can be recorded only close to their source, be very small or absent with some sensory responses. In
and the characteristics of the potential depend on the dis- that case, the initial negative deflection best marks the
tance between the recording electrodes and the electrical true onset of the potential.
Chapter 2 • Anatomy and Neurophysiology for Electrodiagnostic Studies 21
$FWLYHUHFRUGLQJHOHFWURGH P9
PV
î
$FWLYHUHFRUGLQJHOHFWURGH
B
Fig. 2.20 Volume conduction and motor potentials. With the active
recording electrode (G1) over the motor point, depolarization first
occurs at that site, with the depolarization subsequently spreading
away. The corresponding waveform has an initial negative deflec-
tion without any initial positivity (top trace). If the active recording
electrode is off the motor point, depolarization begins distally and
Fig. 2.19 Volume conduction and waveform morphology. Top, An then travels under and past the active electrode, resulting in an initial
advancing action potential recorded by volume conduction will result positive deflection (middle trace). If the depolarization occurs at a
in a triphasic potential that initially is positive, then is negative, and distance and never travels under the recording electrode, only a small
finally is positive again. Bottom, If the depolarization occurs directly positive potential will be seen (bottom trace). Note that, by conven-
beneath the recording electrode, the initial positive phase will be tion, negative is up and positive is down in all nerve conduction and
absent, and a biphasic, initially negative potential will be seen. Note electromyographic traces.
that, by convention, negative is up and positive is down in all nerve
conduction and electromyographic traces.
Suggested Readings Hollinshead WH. Anatomy for Surgeons, Volume 2: The Back
and Limbs. New York: Harper & Row; 1969.
Brown WF. The Physiological and Technical Basis of
Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation. Clinical Examinations in
Electromyography. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1984.
Neurology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1956.
Dumitru D, Delisa JA. AAEM Minimonograph #10: Volume
O’Brien MD. Aids to the Examination of the Peripheral
Conduction. Rochester, MN: American Association of
Nervous System. London: Baillière Tindall; 1986.
Electrodiagnostic Medicine; 1991.
Rasminsky M, Sears TA. Internodal conduction in undissected
Haymaker W, Woodhall B. Peripheral Nerve Injuries.
demyelinated nerve fibres. J Physiol. 1972;227:323–350.
Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1953.
SECTION II • Fundamentals of Nerve Conduction Studies
23
24 SECTION II Fundamentals of Nerve Conduction Studies
P9
PV
$PSOLWXGH
Cathode
'XUDWLRQ
G1
G2
Ground /DWHQF\
'/ 3/
& % $ '
'LVWDO 3UR[LPDO
Fig. 3.3 Motor conduction velocity (CV) calculation. Top, Median motor study, recording abductor pollicis brevis, stimulating wrist and elbow.
The only difference between distal and proximal stimulations is the latency, with PL being longer than DL. Bottom, DL represents three separate
times: the nerve conduction time from the distal stimulation site to the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) (A), the NMJ transmission time (B), and
the muscle depolarization time (C). Accordingly, DL cannot be used alone to calculate a motor CV. Two stimulations are necessary. PL includes
the nerve conduction time from the distal stimulation site to the NMJ (A), the NMJ transmission time (B), and the muscle depolarization time (C),
as well as the nerve conduction time between the proximal and distal stimulation sites (D). If DL (A + B + C) is subtracted from PL (A + B + C + D),
only the nerve conduction time between the distal and proximal stimulation sites (D) remains. The distance between those two sites can be
measured, and a CV can be calculated (distance/time). CV reflects only the fastest conducting fibers in the nerve being studied. DL, Distal motor
latency; PL, proximal motor latency.
$PSOLWXGH
SENSORY CONDUCTION STUDIES
In contrast to motor conduction studies, in which the
CMAP reflects conduction along the motor nerve, NMJ, 'XUDWLRQ
and muscle fibers, in sensory conduction studies, only nerve
fibers are assessed. Because most sensory responses are very
small (usually in the range of 1–50 μV), technical factors 3HDNODWHQF\
and electrical noise assume more importance. For sensory 2QVHWODWHQF\
conduction studies, the gain usually is set at 10–20 μV per Fig. 3.5 Sensory nerve action potential (SNAP). The SNAP rep-
division. A pair of recording electrodes (G1 and G2) are resents the summation of all the underlying sensory fiber action
placed in line over the nerve being studied, at an interelec- potentials. The SNAP usually is biphasic or triphasic in configuration.
trode distance of 2.5–4 cm, with the active electrode (G1) Onset latency is measured from the stimulus to the initial negative de-
flection for biphasic SNAPs (as in the waveform here) or to the initial
placed closest to the stimulator. Recording ring electrodes positive peak for triphasic SNAPs. Onset latency represents nerve
are conventionally used to test the sensory nerves in the conduction time from the stimulus site to the recording electrodes
fingers (Fig. 3.4). For sensory studies, an electrical pulse of for the largest cutaneous sensory fibers in the nerve being studied.
either 100 or 200 ms in duration is used, and most nor- Peak latency is measured at the midpoint of the first negative peak.
Amplitude most commonly is measured from baseline to negative
mal sensory nerves require a current in the range of 5–30
peak. Duration is measured from the initial deflection from baseline
mA to achieve supramaximal stimulation. This is less cur- to the first baseline crossing (i.e., negative peak duration). Only one
rent than what is usually required for motor conduction stimulation site is required to calculate a sensory conduction velocity,
studies. Thus, sensory fibers usually have a lower thresh- as sensory onset latency represents only nerve conduction time.
old to stimulation than do motor fibers. This can easily
be demonstrated on yourself; when slowly increasing the
stimulus intensity, you will feel the paresthesias (sensory) latency, peak latency, duration, and amplitude are measured
before you feel or see the muscle starts to twitch (motor). (Fig. 3.5). Unlike motor studies, a sensory conduction
As in motor studies, the current is slowly increased from a velocity can be calculated with one stimulation site alone,
baseline of 0 mA, usually in 3–5-mA increments, until the by taking the measured distance between the stimulator and
recorded sensory potential is maximized. This potential, active recording electrode and dividing by the onset latency.
the sensory nerve action potential (SNAP), is a compound No NMJ or muscle time needs to be subtracted out by using
potential that represents the summation of all the individual two stimulation sites.
sensory fiber action potentials. SNAPs usually are biphasic
or triphasic potentials. For each stimulation site, the onset
Onset Latency
The onset latency is the time from the stimulus to the initial
negative deflection from baseline for biphasic SNAPs or to
the initial positive peak for triphasic SNAPs. Sensory onset
latency represents nerve conduction time from the stimulus
site to the recording electrodes for the largest cutaneous
sensory fibers in the nerve being studied.
P9
PV
9
PV
Fig. 3.6 Sensory nerve action potential onset and peak laten-
cies. Onset and peak latency measurements each have their own
advantages and disadvantages. Onset latency represents the fastest
conducting fibers and can be used to calculate a conduction velocity.
However, for many potentials, especially small ones, it is difficult to
precisely place the latency marker on the initial deflection from base-
9
line (blue arrows: possible onset latencies). Marking the peak latency
is straightforward, with nearly no interexaminer variation. However, PV
the population of fibers represented by peak latency is unknown; it
cannot be used to calculate a conduction velocity.
the peak latency. Normal values exist for peak latencies for
the most commonly performed sensory studies.
However, peak latencies have two distinct disadvan-
tages. Most important, the peak latency cannot be used to
calculate a conduction velocity. The population of sensory Fig. 3.7 Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) and sensory
fibers represented by the peak latency is not known, in nerve action potential (SNAP) comparison. CMAPs (top) and
contrast to the onset latency, which represents the fast- SNAPs (bottom) are both compound potentials but are quite different
est conducting fibers in the nerve being studied. Second, in terms of size and duration. CMAP amplitude usually is measured
in millivolts, whereas SNAPs are small potentials measured in the
normal values for peak latencies are dependent on using microvolt range (note different gains between the traces). CMAP
standard distances. This can be problematic especially in negative peak duration usually is 5–6 ms, whereas SNAP negative
the upper extremities in patients with particularly large or peak duration is much shorter, typically 1–2 ms. When both sensory
small hands. and motor fibers are stimulated (such as when performing antidromic
sensory or mixed studies), these differences (especially duration) usu-
Both onset and peak latencies can be used in the analy-
ally allow an unknown potential to be recognized as either a nerve or
sis of sensory NCSs. In the examples given in this text in muscle potential.
the later clinical chapters, both values are measured and
reported. If the potential has an abrupt, consistent, and eas-
ily marked onset latency, the onset latency is the preferred
measurement. However, in cases where the onset latency is baseline. The former is preferred given that the SNAP dura-
obscured, or not precise, peak latency is better used. tion measured from the initial to terminal deflection back to
baseline is difficult to mark precisely because the terminal
SNAP returns to baseline very slowly. The SNAP duration
Amplitude typically is much shorter than the CMAP duration (typi-
The SNAP amplitude is most commonly measured from cally 1.5 vs. 5–6 ms, respectively). Thus, duration is often a
baseline to negative peak, but it can also be measured from useful parameter to help identify a potential as a true nerve
the first negative peak to the next positive peak. The SNAP potential rather than a muscle potential (Fig. 3.7).
amplitude reflects the sum of all the individual sensory
fibers that depolarize. Low SNAP amplitudes indicate a
definite disorder of peripheral nerve. Conduction Velocity
Unlike the calculation of a motor conduction velocity, which
requires two stimulation sites, sensory conduction velocity
Duration can be determined with one stimulation, simply by dividing
Like the CMAP duration, SNAP duration is usually mea- the distance traveled by the onset latency. Essentially, distal
sured from the onset of the potential to the first baseline conduction velocity and onset latency are the same mea-
crossing (i.e., negative peak duration), but it also can be surement; they differ only by a multiplication factor (i.e.,
measured from the initial to the terminal deflection back to the distance). Sensory conduction velocity represents the
28 SECTION II Fundamentals of Nerve Conduction Studies
speed of the fastest, myelinated cutaneous sensory fibers in sensory receptor) techniques. For instance, when studying
the nerve being studied. median sensory fibers to the index finger, one can stimulate
Sensory conduction velocity along proximal segments the median nerve at the wrist and record the potential with
of nerve can be determined by performing proximal stim- ring electrodes over the index finger (antidromic study).
ulation and calculating the conduction velocity between Conversely, the same ring electrodes can be used for stimu-
proximal and distal sites, in a manner similar to the calcula- lation, and the potential recorded over the median nerve
tion for motor conduction velocity: (distance between the at the wrist (orthodromic study). Latencies and conduction
proximal and distal stimulation sites) divided by (proximal velocities should be identical with either method (Fig. 3.8),
latency minus distal latency). However, proximal sensory although the amplitude generally is higher in antidromically
studies result in smaller amplitude potentials and often are conducted potentials.
more difficult to perform, even in normal subjects, because In general, the antidromic technique is superior for sev-
of the normal processes of phase cancellation and temporal eral reasons, but each method has its advantages and dis-
dispersion (see later). Note that one can also determine the advantages. Most important, the amplitude is higher with
sensory conduction velocity from the proximal site to the antidromic than with orthodromic recordings, which makes
recording electrode by simply dividing the total distance it easier to identify the potential. The SNAP amplitude
traveled by the proximal onset latency. is directly proportional to the proximity of the recording
electrode to the underlying nerve. For most antidromically
conducted potentials, the recording electrodes are closer
Special Considerations in Sensory
to the nerve. For example, in the antidromically conducted
Conduction Studies: Antidromic Versus median sensory response, the recording ring electrodes are
Orthodromic Recording placed on the finger, very close to the underlying digital
When a nerve is depolarized, conduction occurs equally nerves just beneath the skin from which the potential is
well in both directions away from the stimulation site. Con- recorded. When the montage is reversed for orthodromic
sequently, sensory conduction studies may be performed recording, there is more tissue (e.g., the transverse carpal
using either antidromic (stimulating toward the sensory ligament and other connective tissues) at the wrist separat-
receptor) or orthodromic (stimulating away from the ing the nerve from the recording electrodes. This results
in attenuation of the recorded sensory response, resulting
in a much lower amplitude. The higher SNAP amplitude
obtained with antidromic recordings is the major advantage
9 of using this method. The antidromic technique is espe-
PV cially helpful when recording very small potentials, which
often occur in pathologic conditions. Furthermore, because
the antidromic potential generally is larger than the ortho-
9
dromic potential, it is less subject to noise or other artifacts.
PV However, the antidromic method has some disadvantages
(Fig. 3.9). Because the entire nerve is often stimulated, includ-
ing the motor fibers, this frequently results in the SNAP being
followed by a volume- conducted motor potential. It usu-
ally is not difficult to differentiate between the two because
the SNAP latency typically occurs earlier than the volume-
conducted motor potential. However, problems occur if the
two potentials have a similar latency or, more importantly, if
9
PV the sensory potential is absent. When the latter occurs, one
can mistake the first component of the volume conducted
motor potential for the SNAP, where none truly exists. It is in
this situation that measuring the duration of the potential can
be helpful in distinguishing a sensory from a motor potential.
If one is still not sure, performing an orthodromic study will
Fig. 3.8 Antidromic and orthodromic sensory studies. Median settle the issue, as no volume conducted motor response will
sensory nerve action potential (SNAPs). Top trace, Antidromic study, occur with an orthodromic study. In this case, the antidromic
stimulating wrist, recording index finger. Bottom trace, Orthodro-
mic study, stimulating index finger, recording wrist. Latencies and
and orthodromic potentials should have the same onset latency.
conduction velocities are identical for both. The antidromic method
has the advantage of a higher-amplitude SNAP but is followed by
a large volume-conducted motor potential. If the SNAP is absent
Lesions Proximal to the Dorsal Root
in an antidromic study, care must be taken not to confuse the Ganglion Result in Normal Sensory Nerve
volume-conducted motor potential as the sensory potential. Note Action Potentials
the difference in duration between SNAP and compound muscle
action potential, which helps discriminate between the SNAP and the Peripheral sensory fibers are all derived from the dor-
volume-conducted motor potential that follows. sal root ganglia cells, the primary sensory neurons. These
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
Il lui toucha le bras, du bout de son doigt :
— Regardez-moi bien !
Elle le regarda, d’un regard neutre, où tout semblait mort.
Il dit :
— Vous comprenez, nous devons prendre quelques petits
arrangements. Voici donc ce que je vous impose : l’hypocrisie. Ça ne
vous sera pas difficile… J’aime ma mère plus que tout au monde, et
aujourd’hui plus que jamais. Il faut qu’elle soit heureuse… Si elle
savait ce qui se passe en ce moment dans la maison de son fils, elle
en mourrait !… Elle n’en saura rien. Je le veux… je vous impose de
la rendre heureuse, à force de ruse habile, et de mensonge…
J’entends que vous trompiez tout le monde, — excepté moi. C’est
bien clair, n’est-ce pas ?
Elle se taisait.
— Mais répondez donc !
Elle se taisait toujours, l’air hautain et dur.
Une fureur inouïe le secoua. Il crispa ses poings et serra les
dents ; et, terrible, il gronda :
— Ça sera comme ça, — ou j’étrangle !
Il lui montrait ses deux mains ouvertes, crispées en crochets,
pareilles à des serres.
— Oh ! je n’ai jamais peur ! fit-elle.
Et après avoir cherché et pesé son mot :
— J’obéirai, dit-elle tout sec.
Elle était sans crainte, mais elle préparait les lendemains ; et,
pour cela, cette promesse d’obéir, faite sur ce ton d’insolence et de
révolte, fut la seule concession qu’elle trouva.
— Vous obéirez ? C’est heureux ! fit-il. Allons, bonsoir ; je vous
souhaite le doux repos que donne une conscience pure. A demain !
Il la quitta.
« C’est bien cela, songeait-il : ruse, mensonge, orgueil, orgueil
surtout !… Il me faudra un gant de fer. »
A peine hors de sa présence, il se sentit défaillir, sous
l’écroulement de son bonheur, mais il marcha jusqu’à sa chambre et
se jeta, tout vêtu, sur son lit. Au milieu du pêle-mêle de ses pensées
affreuses, celle-ci reparaissait toujours dans un demi-rêve : « Si elle
pouvait avoir l’idée d’aller se noyer, est-ce qu’il ne faudrait pas la
laisser faire ?… Allons, allons, c’est une autre que j’aimais. Voilà ce
que je dois me dire. Il y a erreur sur la personne, répétait-il… Mais
comment peut-on se laisser aveugler à ce point ? — Oh ! la
passion ! »
Quant à elle, elle se déshabilla lentement, et tout de suite, se mit
au lit.
Elle renonçait à penser. Tout cela était fatal, et trop fort,
décidément, trop compliqué… « Non ! quelle affaire, mes amis ! et
que de bruit pour trois chiffons de papier !… Qu’est-ce que dira cette
folle de Berthe ?… Elle n’en reviendra pas !… Je suis sûre qu’il n’y a,
en France, qu’un seul homme comme ça. Et j’ai eu la veine de
tomber dessus ! Vrai, c’était fait pour moi !… Était-il beau tout à
l’heure ! C’est un homme, un vrai, ça, et crâne, encore !… Bah ! je le
ramènerai. C’est ça qui sera amusant !… Le bonheur de la mère,
c’est la planche de salut, — et solide ; il faut s’y tenir… Je ne peux
pourtant pas songer… aux inscrits, avant d’avoir fait la conquête de
mon époux… C’est bien drôle !… »
Et comme il arrive après les morts, après les désespoirs, les
grandes épreuves, lasse de tant d’émotions et d’aventures, — elle
dormit, cette nuit-là, d’un sommeil d’enfant. D’ailleurs, il fallait ça,
pour être jolie dès le lendemain, et engager la bataille.
IV