0% found this document useful (0 votes)
63 views

Grade 10: National Senior Certificate

Questions history

Uploaded by

kgomotsodiphoko7
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
63 views

Grade 10: National Senior Certificate

Questions history

Uploaded by

kgomotsodiphoko7
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 21

NATIONAL

SENIOR CERTIFICATE

GRADE 10

NOVEMBER 2020

HISTORY (VERSION 1)
(EXEMPLAR)

MARKS: 150

TIME: 3 hours

This question paper consists of 9 pages and an addendum with 12 pages.


2 HISTORY (EC/NOVEMBER 2020)

INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION

1. This question paper consists of SECTION A and SECTION B based on the


prescribed content framework in the CAPS document. THREE source-based
questions under SECTION A and THREE essay questions under SECTION B.

SECTION A: SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS

QUESTION 1: TRANSFORMATION IN SOUTHERN AFRICA AFTER 1750

QUESTION 2: COLONIAL EXPANSION AFTER 1750

QUESTION 3: SOUTH AFRICAN WAR AND UNION

SECTION B: ESSAY QUESTIONS

QUESTION 4: TRANSFORMATION IN SOUTHERN AFRICA AFTER 1750:


THE EMERGENCE OF THE SOTHO KINGDOM UNDER
KING MOSHOESHOE

QUESTION 5: COLONIAL EXPANSION AFTER 1750: CO-OPERATION


AND CONFLICT IN THE HIGHVELD

QUESTION 6: SOUTH AFRICAN WAR AND THE UNION: THE NATIVE


LAND ACT OF 1913

2. SECTION A consists of THREE source-based questions. Source materials that


are required to answer these questions will be found in the ADDENDUM.

3. SECTION B consists of THREE essay questions.

4. Answer three questions as follows:

4.1 At least ONE source-based question must be answered and at least


ONE essay must be answered.

4.2 The THIRD question can be either a source-based question or an essay.

5. When answering the questions, you should apply your knowledge, skills and
insight.

6. You will be disadvantaged by merely rewriting the sources as answers.

7. Number the answers correctly according to the numbering system used in this
question paper.

8. Write neatly and legibly.

Copyright reserved Please turn over


(EC/NOVEMBER 2020) HISTORY 3

SECTION A: SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS

Answer at least ONE question, but not more than TWO questions in this section.
Source material to be used to answer these questions is contained in the
ADDENDUM.

QUESTION 1: HOW DID SHAKA, A WARRIOR, CONSOLIDATE THE


POWERFUL ZULU KINGDOM?

Study Source 1A, 1B, 1C and 1D and answer the questions that follow.

1.1 Refer to Source 1A.

1.1.1 Who according to the source, was Shaka’s mother? (1 x 1) (1)

1.1.2 Explain what is meant by, ‘growing up as a fatherless child’. (1 x 2) (2)

1.1.3 Name the chiefs of the following Nguni groups:

(a) Mthethwa

(b) Ndwandwe (2 x 1) (2)

1.1.4 Use the information in the source and your own knowledge and explain
how Shaka developed into a warrior. (2 x 2) (4)

1.1.5 Explain how Dingiswayo contributed towards Shaka’s accomplishments.


(2 x 2) (4)

1.2 Read Source 1B.

1.2.1 What according to the source, was the name of Shaka’s capital? (1 x 1) (1)

1.2.2 Give another meaning of the word ‘KwaBulawayo’. (1 x 1) (1)

1.2.3 Explain the term ‘Mfecane’, in the context of Shaka’s wars during his
reign. (1 x 2) (2)

1.2.4 Provide THREE names of chiefs or leaders that moved northwards due
to fear of Shaka. (3 x 1) (3)

1.2.5 How, according to the source, did the development of the military system
cause major economic and social changes in the Zulu kingdom?
(3 x 1) (3)

1.2.6 Using the information in the source and your own knowledge, explain
the consequences of Shaka’s wars. (2 x 2) (4)

Copyright reserved Please turn over


4 HISTORY (EC/NOVEMBER 2020)

1.3 Consult Source 1C.

1.3.1 Name TWO white traders that visited Shaka in 1824. (2 x 1) (2)

1.3.2 According to the source, what was the reasons for Shaka to welcome
the white traders? (3 x 1) (3)

1.3.3 Provide evidence from the source that suggest that Shaka had a kind
and friendly character. (2 x 1) (2)

1.3.4 According to the source, how was Shaka perceived? (2 x 1) (2)

1.3.5 Explain, what do you think the traders’ ulterior (hidden) motives for
visiting Shaka was? (1 x 2) (2)

1.4 Read Source 1D.

1.4.1 What message does the picture portray about Shaka? Use the visual
clues from the source to support your answer. (1 x 2) (2)

1.4.2 Compare Source 1A and Source 1D. Explain, how the information in
Source 1A support the evidence in Source 1D with regards to Shaka
consolidating the Zulu kingdom? (2 x 2) (4)

1.5 Using the information in the relevant sources and your own knowledge, write a
paragraph of about SIX lines (about 60 words) explaining how Shaka a warrior,
consolidated a powerful Zulu kingdom. (6)
[50]

Copyright reserved Please turn over


(EC/NOVEMBER 2020) HISTORY 5

QUESTION 2: HOW DID BRITISH COLONIALISM IMPACT ON THE LIVES


OF THE PEOPLE OF THE CAPE COLONY?

Study sources 2A, 2B, 2C and 2D and answer the questions that follow.

2.1 Refer to Source 2A.

2.1.1 Define the term colonialism in your own words. (1 x 2) (2)

2.1.2 Who, according to the source, appeared to Nongqawuse? (1 x 1) (1)

2.1.3 What, according to the source, were the instructions of the two strange
spirits to Nongqawuse about the Xhosa nation? (2 x 1) (2)

2.1.4 Extract evidence from the source, that Nongqawuse used to justify
the failure of the prophecy. (1 x 1) (1)

2.1.5 Use your own knowledge to explain the effects of the cattle killing
on the Xhosa nation. (2 x 2) (4)

2.2 Consult Source 2B.

2.2.1 Who, according to the source, were the indigenous people of the
Cape in 1652? (1 x 1) (1)

2.2.2 Provide evidence from the source, which indicates the positive changes
made by the missionaries on their arrival in the Cape Colony. (2 x 1) (2)

2.2.3 Comment on the consequences (end results) of the Ordinance 50 on


the Boers. (2 x 2) (4)

2.3 Study Source 2C.

2.3.1 Extract evidence from the source, which suggests the expectations of
the Boers when they moved from the Cape to the interior. (3 x 1) (3)

2.3.2 What, according to the source, was the Boers reaction to Anglicisation?
(2 x 1) (2)

2.3.3 Use the source and identify the Boers dissatisfaction with the
missionaries which led to the Great Trek. (4 x 1) (4)

2.3.4 Explain why the Boers were interested in getting more land. (2 x 2) (4)

2.3.5 Comment on the Boers attitude towards the Blacks in the Cape Colony.
(2 x 2) (4)

Copyright reserved Please turn over


6 HISTORY (EC/NOVEMBER 2020)

2.4 Read Source 2D.

2.4.1 Who, according to the source, were responsible for the Xhosa cattle-
killing? (1 x 2) (2)

2.4.2 What message does the picture convey about the Xhosa cattle-killing
crisis between 1856–1857? (2 x 2) (4)

2.4.3 Comment on the usefulness of this source for a historian researching


the Xhosa cattle-killing of 1856–1857. (2 x 2) (4)

2.5 Using the information in the relevant sources and your own knowledge, write a
paragraph of about SIX lines (about 60 words) explaining how the British
Colonialism impact on the lives of the people of the Cape Colony. (6)
[50]

Copyright reserved Please turn over


(EC/NOVEMBER 2020) HISTORY 7

QUESTION 3: HOW DID THE SOUTH AFRICAN WAR AFFECT THE LIVES OF
BOTH THE BOERS AND THE BLACK SOUTH AFRICANS
DURING THE YEARS 1899 TO 1902?

Study Sources 3A, 3B, 3C and 3D and answer the questions that follow.

3.1 Refer to Source 3A.

3.1.1 Identify TWO Boer Republics that were involved in the South African
War. (2 x 1) (2)

3.1.2 When, according to the source, did the South African War break out?
(1 x 1) (1)

3.1.3 Name the black population groups which were also affected by this
war. (4 x 1) (4)

3.1.4 Use your knowledge and explain why the war was known as a the
‘white man’s war’. (1 x 2) (2)

3.1.5 Comment on why the black population groups regarded the South
African War as their advantage. (2 x 2) (4)

3.2 Read Source 3B.

3.2.1 Explain what is meant by the ‘Scorched Earth Policy’. (1 x 2) (2)

3.2.2 What, according to the source, were the reasons for the escalating
number of deaths in the Black concentration camps? (3 x 1) (3)

3.2.3 Use your own knowledge to explain why the treatment of Blacks and
Whites in the camps was not the same. (1 x 2) (2)

3.2.4 Comment on the significance of the signing of the Treaty of


Vereeniging. (2 x 2) (4)

3.3 Consult Source 3C.

3.3.1 Identify TWO conditions that shows Lizzie was in need of good care.
(2 x 1) (2)

3.3.2 Why, according to the source, was Lizzie’s mother regarded as an


‘undesirable’? (2 x 1) (2)

3.3.3 Provide evidence from the source which indicates the reasons for the
high fatality rate in the concentration camps. (4 x 1) (4)

3.3.4 Using your own knowledge, explain the relationship between the
Boers and the British. (2 x 2) (4)

Copyright reserved Please turn over


8 HISTORY (EC/NOVEMBER 2020)

3.4 Study Source 3D.

3.4.1 What message is conveyed by the picture? (2 x 2) (4)

3.4.2 Compare Source 3B and Source 3D. Explain how the information in
Source 3B supports the evidence in Source 3D regarding the
conditions in the camps. (2 x 2) (4)

3.5 Using the information in the relevant sources and your own knowledge, write a
paragraph of about SIX lines (about 60 words) explaining how did the South
African War affected the lives of both the Boers and the Black South Africans
during the years 1899–1902. (6)
[50]

Copyright reserved Please turn over


(EC/NOVEMBER 2020) HISTORY 9

SECTION B: ESSAY QUESTIONS

QUESTION 4: TRANSFORMATION IN SOUTHERN AFRICA AFTER 1750 – THE


EMERGENCE OF THE SOTHO KINGDOM UNDER KING
MOSHOESHOE

Moshoeshoe was a great military strategist, diplomat and a nation builder.

Do you agree with the statement? Substantiate your answer with relevant historical
evidence. [50]

QUESTION 5: COLONIAL EXPANSION AFTER 1750 – CO-OPERATION AND


CONFLICT IN THE HIGHVELD

There was a lot of conflict and co-operation in the Highveld between the British, Boers
and the Basotho.

Discuss this statement with reference to how the British were successful in resolving
the conflict. [50]

QUESTION 6: THE SOUTH AFRICAN WAR AND THE UNION – THE NATIVE
LAND ACT OF 1913

Critically discuss the social and economic impact of the Native Land Act of 1913 to
the Black people.

Use relevant evidence to support your line of argument. [50]

TOTAL: 150

Copyright reserved Please turn over


NATIONAL
SENIOR CERTIFICATE

GRADE 10

NOVEMBER 2020

HISTORY (VERSION 1)
ADDENDUM
(EXEMPLAR)

This addendum consists of 12 pages.


2 HISTORY (ADDENDUM) (EC/NOVEMBER 2020)

QUESTION 1: HOW DID SHAKA, A WARRIOR, CONSOLIDATE A POWERFUL


ZULU KINGDOM?

SOURCE 1A

The source below focuses on Shaka’s upbringing and how he became a warrior.

Nandi and her son sought sanctuary in the Mhlathuze Valley of the Langeni people. Here,
growing up as a fatherless child, Shaka seems to have been the victim of humiliation and
cruel treatment by the Langeni boys. At that time there were two strong rival Nguni groups,
the Mthethwa led by the paramount chief Dingiswayo, and the Ndwandwe under the
ferocious cruel Zwide ... He thus grew up in the court of Dingiswayo, who welcomed them
with friendliness. Shaka, however, suffered much from the bullying and teasing of the
Mthethwa boys, too, who resented his claims to chiefly descent.

As he grew to manhood, Shaka began to discover new talents and faculties. Outwardly,
he was tall and powerfully built, and his skill and daring gave him a natural mastery over
the youths in his age group; inwardly, he was developing a thirst for power. Probably when
he was about twenty-three years old, he was drafted into one of the Mthethwa regiments
where he found a satisfaction he had never known before. With the impi in the iziCwe
regiment, he had the companionship he had previously lacked, while the battlefield
provided a stadium in which he could demonstrate his talents and courage. His
outstanding deeds of courage attracted the attention of his overlord and, rising rapidly in
Dingiswayo's army, he became one of his foremost commanders … While in the Mthethwa
army Shaka became engrossed in problems of strategy and battle tactics, and Dingiswayo
contributed much toward Shaka's later accomplishments in war. Militarism was thereafter
to be a way of life for him, and one that he was to inflict on thousands of others.

[From https://www.sahistory.org.za/people/shaka-zulu. Accessed on 18 November 2020.]

Copyright reserved Please turn over


(EC/NOVEMBER 2020 HISTORY (ADDENDUM) 3

SOURCE 1B

The source below outlines how Shaka built his kingdom.

KwaBulawayo. Shaka's first capital was on the banks of the Mhodi, a small tributary
(branch) of the Mkhumbane River in the Babanango district. He named his great place
KwaBulawayo (‘at the place of the murder’). As his kingdom grew, he built a far bigger
KwaBulawayo, ...

Economic and social changes. The development of the military system caused major
economic and social changes. So much youth was concentrated at the royal barracks that
it resulted in a massive transfer of economic potential to a centralised state. However, the
cattle wealth of the whole community throughout the kingdom was greatly improved; even
though most of the herds were owned by the king and his chiefs and indunas, all shared
in the pride roused by the magnificence of the royal herds as well as the pride of belonging
to the unequalled military power of the Zulu.

Effects of Shaka’s wars: His wars were accompanied by great slaughter and caused many
migrations. Their effects were felt even far north of the Zambezi River. Because they
feared Shaka, leaders like Zwangendaba, Mzilikazi, and Shoshangane moved northwards
far into the central African interior and in their turn sowed war and destruction before
developing their own kingdoms. Some estimate that during his reign Shaka caused the
death of more than a million people. Shaka’s wars between 1818 and 1828 contributed to
a series of forced migrations known in various parts of southern Africa as the Mfecane,
Difaqane, Lifaqane or Fetcani. Groups of refugees from Shaka's assaults, first Hlubi and
Ngwane clans, later followed by the Mantatees and the Matabele of Mzilikazi, crossed the
Drakensberg to the west, smashing chiefdoms in their path. Famine and chaos followed
the wholesale extermination (killing) … Old chiefdoms vanished and new ones were
created.

[From https://www.sahistory.org.za/people/shaka-zulu. Accessed on 18 November 2020.]

Copyright reserved Please turn over


4 HISTORY (ADDENDUM) (EC/NOVEMBER 2020)

SOURCE 1C

This article deals with Shaka’s reaction to the arrival of the whites at Port Natal.

By the time the first white traders arrived at Port Natal in 1824, Shaka was in control of a
centralised monarchy, which spanned the entire eastern coastal belt from the Pongola
River in the north to the lands beyond the Tugela in the south. That year, Henry Francis
Fynn and Francis Farewell visited Shaka ... Shaka accorded (gave) the white traders most
favoured treatment, ceded (give up) them land, and permitted them to build a settlement
at Port Natal. He was curious about their technological developments, was anxious to
learn much more about warfare, and he was especially interested in the culture they
represented. Moreover, he was alert to the advantages that their trade might bring to him.

In 1826, in order to be closer and more accessible to the settlers at Port Natal, Shaka built
large military barracks at Dukuza, (‘the place where one gets lost') ... During his lifetime,
there were no conflicts between the whites and the Zulus, as Shaka did not want to
precipitate clashes with the military forces of the Cape colonial government. H F Fynn,
who knew him well, found him intelligent and often amiable (kind/friendly), and mentioned
occasions that leave no doubt that Shaka was capable of generosity. Freed from the
restrictions that limited most chiefs, Shaka acted as an undisputed, almighty ruler. A cruel
tyrant, he had men executed with a nod of his head. The loyalties of his people were
severely strained as the frequent cruelties of their great king increased steadily.

[From https://www.sahistory.org.za/people/shaka-zulu. Accessed on 20 November 2020.]

Copyright reserved Please turn over


(EC/NOVEMBER 2020 HISTORY (ADDENDUM) 5

SOURCE 1D

This is a drawing of a Zulu warrior during Shaka’s reign.

[From https://www.google.com/search?q=shaka%20zulu%20warrior&tbm =isch&tbs=


rimg:Cfs1gVAfwZN9YRxRlzuPdzl6&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CBsQuIIBahcKEwigqIy74pLtAhUAAAAAHQAAAAA
QEA&biw=1235&bih=597#imgrc=cWzkniEjtqUDdM. Accessed on 20 November 2020.]

Copyright reserved Please turn over


6 HISTORY (ADDENDUM) (EC/NOVEMBER 2020)

QUESTION 2: HOW DID BRITISH COLONIALISM IMPACT ON THE LIVES OF THE


PEOPLE OF THE CAPE COLONY?

SOURCE 2A

This source below focuses on Nongqawuse’s prophecy to the Xhosa people.

Nongqawuse, … was a prophetess of the Great Xhosa cattle killing of 1856–1857.


Nongqawuse was an orphan living with her uncle Mhlakaza at the Gxarha River in
independent Xhosa land ... One day in April 1856, she informed her household that she
had encountered two stranger spirits from another world who told her that the entire nation
would rise from the dead provided that the Xhosa slaughtered all their cattle and destroyed
all their corn. The reason given was that people and animals alike had been defiled
(spoiled) by witchcraft and that the living must cleanse themselves from all contamination
(uncleanness) so that new people and pure cattle would rise.

Nongqawuse’s prophecies were embraced (welcomed) by the overwhelming majority of


the Xhosa people ... Even worse, they had seen their cattle herds decimated (killed) by an
alien disease of bovine lung sickness, thus giving credence (trust) to the prophetic
message that, “They have been wicked (evil) and everything belonging to them is
therefore bad.” A small minority of Xhosas, known as amagogotya (stingy ones) refused
to slaughter their cattle and this refusal was used by Nongqawuse to rationalise (justify)
the failure of the prophecy over a period of fifteen months (April 1856–June 1857).

[From xhosaculture.co.za/nongqawuse-xhosa-cattle-killings-1856-57/. Accessed on 21 January 2020.]

Copyright reserved Please turn over


(EC/NOVEMBER 2020 HISTORY (ADDENDUM) 7

SOURCE 2B

This article outlines Ordinance 50 and its effects on the lives of the people in the Cape
Colony.

At times called the ‘Magna Carta of the Coloured people’, this law (Ordinance 50) in 1828
gave ‘Hottentots and other free persons of colour’ the same rights as whites in the Cape
Colony. When the Dutch settled at the Cape in 1652, the indigenous people they found in
the area were Khoikhoi (previously called Hottentots). In law, these people were free ...
Over time, many Khoikhoi lost their cattle and economic independence and became
labourers for whites. Over time too, a growing group of people of mixed parentage (whites,
Khoikhoi and slaves) was created and were joined by freed slaves ...

Simultaneously (at the same time) with the British occupation of the Cape in the 1790s,
missionaries, fresh from Britain already in the throes of the antislavery movement, arrived
to begin work with these very people. For the next several decades, they led the fight to
alleviate (ease) discrimination and exploitation. Generally, the British colonial officials
wanted to avoid trouble from the white settlers and were reluctant (doubtful) to take
action ...

However, missionaries still complained about abuse and the inequality suffered by the
‘Coloured People’. … Ordinance 50 was the result. It stated that henceforward, ‘Hottentots
and other free persons of colour’ were to be subject to no laws to which whites were not
also subject, including the 'vagrancy' practices and pass requirements. Freedom to move
and freedom to own land were explicitly (clearly) decreed (declared). It therefore forbade
(stopped) any racially discriminatory legislation and decreed (declared) equality before the
law ...

[From smu-facweb.smu.ca/~wmills/course322/50th_Ordinance.html. Accessed on 24 January 2020.]

Copyright reserved Please turn over


8 HISTORY (ADDENDUM) (EC/NOVEMBER 2020)

SOURCE 2C

The following source focusses on the causes of the Great Trek.

The Great Trek was a massive (big) movement – Great Journey or migration of the
dissatisfied Afrikaners. The Afrikaners (Boers and their servants) from the Cape Colony
moved into the interior of South Africa to get a free safe haven, as they also hoped to
establish a settlement of their own, free from British influence and interference ... They also
moved away from the colonial administration of the British and those who trekked were
semi-nomadic pastoralists who wanted large areas of land between 1830–1840s.

The movement of the Boers involved slightly over 14 000 people who wanted to establish
settlements of their own ... When the British settled at the Cape, they initiated (started)
Anglicisation and the area became a British colony. The Boers were forced to adopt English
as an official language, which others resented and became very unhappy. When the British
came to the Cape Colony, they favoured the Africans, introduced the black Circuit Courts
where Africans could sue their Boer masters ... The British introduced the 50th Ordinance
in 1828. The Ordinance favoured Africans to work for the people whom they voluntarily
chose. The role of Christian missionaries led to the discontent (dissatisfaction) of the Boers
who now moved dissatisfied with the triumph of the latter’s work.

The slave trade and slavery were abolished at the Cape Colony in 1834 ... There was also
land shortage as a result of over population, which forced the Boers to move away ... The
Boers considered themselves a chosen race of God. They did not want to mix with the
Africans.

[From https:/mubulahistory.blogspot.com/2016/12/causes-of-great-trek.html. Accessed on 24 January


2020.]

Copyright reserved Please turn over


(EC/NOVEMBER 2020 HISTORY (ADDENDUM) 9

SOURCE 2D

This photograph shows Nongqawuse with fellow prophetess, Nonkosi.

[From www.sahistory,org.za. Accessed on 20 November 2020.]

Copyright reserved Please turn over


10 HISTORY (ADDENDUM) (EC/NOVEMBER 2020)

QUESTION 3: HOW DID THE SOUTH AFRICAN WAR AFFECT THE LIVES OF
BOTH THE BOERS AND THE BLACK SOUTH AFRICANS DURING
THE YEARS 1899–1902?

SOURCE 3A

The following article focuses on the involvement of black population groups in the Anglo-
Boer War of 1899 to 1902.

“The South African War broke out on 11 October 1899 between the two former Boer
republics (Transvaal and the Orange Free State) and the British. But war touches the lives
of all inhabitants of the affected country and it would be unacceptable to not acknowledge
the many ways it destroyed the lives of the black population groups including the Khoi,
San, Zulu, Xhosa, Tsonga, and Swati. Whether their role was voluntary or involuntary;
combatant or non-combatant, we would be doing an injustice to our history if we removed
them from this war.

Black people were conscripted and used as slaves and servants as scouts, messengers,
watchmen in blockhouses, despatch runners, cattle raiders, trench diggers, drivers,
labourers, ‘agterryers’ and auxiliaries. The ‘agterryers’ were used by the Boers for
guarding ammunition, cooking, collecting firewood, mending the horses, and loading
firearms for battle. It is important to note that auxiliaries were also used in fighting, evident
in some of the photographs taken during the war. At least 15 000 blacks were used as
combatants by the British and also by both British and Boers as wagon drivers.”

[From https://www.religiousleftlaw.com/2017/05/black-african-concentration-camps-in-the-second-anglo-
boer-war-11-october-1899-31-may-1902.html. Accessed on 17 November 2020.]

SOURCE 3B

This extract describes the conditions in the concentration camps.

30 May 1902 is the date used to mark the deaths of at least 15 000 Black Africans in
concentration camps that housed approximately 115 000 of their number during the
Second Anglo-Boer War (26,370 Boer women and children died in separate
‘concentration’ camps as well, and those camps included Black servants).

The date is significant because it comes the day before the signing of the “peace”
agreement, the Treaty of Vereeniging, at Melrose House in Pretoria on 31 May 1902.

Later estimates put the number at closer to 20,000 Black Africans, the majority of whom
were children, the causes of death being primarily medical neglect, exposure, infectious
diseases (e.g., measles, whooping cough, typhoid fever, diphtheria and dysentery) and
malnutrition. The establishment of these camps was but one part of a ‘Scorched Earth
Policy’ adopted by British Commander Lord Kitchener during the South African War (‘once
called the last gentleman’s war’) as a counter-measure to the Boers’ guerrilla strategy
employed at the end of 1900.

[From https://www.religiousleftlaw.com/2017/05/black-african-concentration-camps-in-the-second-anglo-
boer-war-11-october-1899-31-may-1902.html. Accessed 17 November 2020.]

Copyright reserved Please turn over


(EC/NOVEMBER 2020 HISTORY (ADDENDUM) 11

SOURCE 3C

This source shows what Emily Hobhouse, who was an outspoken critic of British foreign
policy, reported about the conditions children and women faced in concentration camps.

Lizzie van Zyl was a frail (slender), weak little child in desperate need of good care. Yet,
because her mother was one of the "undesirables" due to the fact that her father neither
surrendered nor betrayed his people. Lizzie was placed on the lowest rations and so
perished with hunger that, after a month in the camp, she was transferred to the new small
hospital. Here she was treated harshly. The English disposed doctor and his nurses did
not understand her language and, as she could not speak English, labelled her an idiot
although she was mentally fit and normal …

Summarising the reasons for the high fatality rate, she writes, “Numbers crowded into
small tents: some sick, some dying, occasionally a dead one among them; scanty rations
dealt out raw; lack of fuel to cook them; lack of water for drinking, for cooking, for washing;
lack of soap, brushes and other instruments of personal cleanliness; lack of bedding or of
beds to keep the body off the bare earth; lack of clothing for warmth and in many cases
for decency ...”. Her conclusion is that the whole system is cruel and should be abolished.

[From https://www.sahistory.org.za/topic/women-children-white-concentration-camps-during-anglo-boer-
war-1900-1902. Accessed on 12 February 2020.]

SOURCE 3D

This photograph shows the Black African concentration camps in the Second Anglo-Boer
War (11 October 1899–1902).

[From https://www.religiousleftlaw.com/2017/05/black-african-concentration-camps-in-the-second-anglo-
boer-war-11-october-1899-31-may-1902.html. Accessed on 17 November 2020.]

Copyright reserved Please turn over


12 HISTORY (ADDENDUM) (EC/NOVEMBER 2020)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Visual sources and other historical evidence were taken from the following:

https://www.sahistory.org.za/people/shaka-zulu.

https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=shaka+zulu&FORM=HDRSC2.

https://www.google.com/search?q=shaka%20zulu%20warrior&tbm=isch&tbs=rimg:Cfs1
gVAfwZN9YRxRlzuPdzl6&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CBsQuIIBahcKEwigqIy74pLtAhUAAAAA
HQAAAAAQEA&biw=1235&bih=597#imgrc=cWzkniEjtqUDdM.

smu-facweb.smu.ca/~wmills/course322/50th_Ordinance.html

https:/mubulahistory.blogspot.com/2016/12/causes-of-great-trek.html

www.sahistory.org.za.

https://www.sahistory.org.za/article/role-black-people-south-african-war.

https://www.religiousleftlaw.com/2017/05/black-african-concentration-camps-in-the-
second-anglo-boer-war-11-october-1899-31-may-1902.html.

Copyright reserved Please turn over

You might also like