RPH Notes Pre MID
RPH Notes Pre MID
Module 1: RPH Lec 2 COURSE OVERVIEW2: 4. A primary source is more reliable than a
HISTORY, HISTORICAL METHODOLOGY, secondary source
HISTORICALCRITICISM,
5. If a number of independent sources contain
HISTORIOGRAPHY, RELEVANCE,
the same message, the credibility of the
SOURCES OF HISTORICAL NARRATIVES
message is strongly increased.
What is History?
6. If it can be demonstrated that the witness or
the study of past events considered together, source has no direct interest in creating bias
esp. events or developments of a particular then the credibility of the message is
period of time, country, or subject increased.
the study of past events, particularly in human HISTORICAL CRITICISM
affairs
External Criticism is that part of the historical
the study of the past –specifically the people, method which determines the authenticity of
societies, events and problems of the past –as the source
well as our attempts to understand them. It is a
• The first important step is to determine
pursuit common to all human societies
whether the given source is at all admissible as
PAST vs HISTORY evidence, or, in other words, whether the
material is genuine or not.
The past refers to an earlier time, the people
and societies who lived in it and the events that • It is necessary to know at the outset whether
took place. On the other hand, history the chronicle, charter, or relic is in reality what
describes our attempts to research, study and it claims to be
explain the past.
Jose E. Marco (1878?-1963)
HISTORICAL METHODOLOGY
the techniques and guidelines by which
historians use primary sources and other
evidence to study &write historical narratives
HISTORICAL METHODOLOGY
Source criticism: Core Principles
(Olden-Jørgensen (1998) and Thurén (1997)
1. Human sources may be relics such as a
fingerprint; or narratives such as a statement or
a letter. Relics are more credible sources than “We wanted proof of pre Spanish civilization,
narratives. he created it for us. We wanted works of Fr.
Burgos, he manufactured it for us.”
2. Any given source may be forged or
corrupted. Strong indications of the originality HISTORICAL CRITICISM
of the source increase its reliability. Internal Criticism is that part of the historical
3. The closer a source is to the event which it method which determines the historicity of the
describes, the more one can trust it to give an facts contained in the document.
accurate historical description of what actually • weighs the relation of the testimony to
happened. the truth
• often called Higher Criticism, since it primary sources) and the synthesis of these
deals with more important matter than particulars into a narrative that will stand the
external form test of time
• It is not of absolute necessity that the
document be proven genuine; even
forgeries or documents with truncated WHY?
truths may contain available material
• In order to determine the value of these “Those who cannot remember the past are
facts, the character of the sources, the condemned to repeat it”
knowledge of the author, and the Historical Revisionism vs. Distortion
influences prevalent at the time of
writing must be carefully investigated. SOURCES OF HISTORICAL DATA
● Intended Audience: Emilio Jacinto, KKK Ephemera Title: 1891 Real Loteria Filipina
General (Loto Ticket)
● Why it was written or produced: Warning ● Produced: 1891
about the Caviteňo plot to kill Bonifacio ● Produced by: Real Loteria Filipina,
& abolish the KKK Spanish Colonial Administration of the
Philippines
● Intended Audience: Inhabitants of the
Philippines during the Spanish colonial
period
● Why it was written or produced:
Revenue generation for the Spanish
Diary Title: La Revolucion Filipina government in the Philippines
● Produced: 1898-1901
● Produced by: Apolinario Mabini
● Intended Audience: The Filipino People
● Why it was written or produced: His duty
to give his countrymen & accounting of
his activities