Scribd
Upload
6 views

EVALUATION FORManother

for submission

Uploaded by

ibanez.quen.marga
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
6 views

EVALUATION FORManother

for submission

Uploaded by

ibanez.quen.marga
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

On-the-Job Training Evaluation and Assessment

Purpose:
This evaluation aims to assess the performance, skills, and overall development of the student
during their on-the-job training period. The feedback provided will help the student
understand their strengths, identify areas for improvement, and guide their professional
growth. Additionally, it assists the educational institution in ensuring the training objectives
are met and supports future curriculum improvements.

Instructions:

1. Completeness: Please fill out all sections of the evaluation form. Your thorough and
honest feedback is essential for an accurate assessment.
2. Ratings: For each criterion, select the rating that best describes the student's
performance.
The rating scale is as follows:
o Excellent: The student consistently exceeds expectations.
o Good: The student meets expectations and occasionally exceeds them.
o Fair: The student meets some expectations but needs improvement.
o Poor: The student frequently falls short of expectations.
3. Comments: Provide specific examples and detailed comments in each section to
support your ratings. This will offer valuable insights to the student and their academic
advisors.
4. Additional Comments: Use this section to provide any additional feedback or
observations not covered by the specific criteria.
5. Recommendations: Indicate whether you would recommend the student for a
permanent position or further opportunities based on their performance during the
training period.

Evaluation Form:

Student Name: Quennie Margarette B. Ibanez__________________________


Training Period: June 3,2024 – July 5,2024______________________________
Supervisor Name: Rowell John B. Yu____________________________________
Date of Evaluation: July 5,2024__________________________________________

1. Attendance and Punctuality

• Attendance Record:
 ☐ Excellent (Consistently present)
 ☐ Good (Rarely absent)
 ☐ Fair (Occasionally absent)
 ☐ Poor (Frequently absent)
• Punctuality:
 ☐ Excellent (Always on time)
 ☐ Good (Usually on time)
 ☐ Fair (Occasionally late)
 ☐ Poor (Frequently late)
Comments:

2. Work Quality

• Accuracy and Attention to Detail:


 ☐ Excellent (Consistently accurate
and thorough)
 ☐ Good (Usually accurate and
thorough)
 ☐ Fair (Sometimes accurate, needs
improvement)
 ☐ Poor (Frequent errors)
• Completion of Tasks:
 ☐ Excellent (Consistently meets
deadlines)
 ☐ Good (Usually meets deadlines)
 ☐ Fair (Occasionally misses
deadlines)
 ☐ Poor (Frequently misses
deadlines)

Comments:

3. Work Attitude

• Motivation and Initiative:


 ☐ Excellent (Highly motivated, takes
initiative)
 ☐ Good (Motivated, occasionally
takes initiative)
 ☐ Fair (Needs encouragement)
 ☐ Poor (Lacks motivation)
• Adaptability and Flexibility:
 ☐ Excellent (Easily adapts to new
situations)
 ☐ Good (Usually adapts well)
 ☐ Fair (Occasionally resistant to
change)
 ☐ Poor (Frequently resistant to
change)

Comments:
4. Technical Skills

•Competence in Job-Related Skills:


 ☐ Excellent (Highly competent)
 ☐ Good (Competent)
 ☐ Fair (Adequate, needs
improvement
 ☐ Poor (Lacks competence)
• Willingness to Learn:
 ☐ Excellent (Eager to learn new skills)
 ☐ Good (Willing to learn)
 ☐ Fair (Occasionally willing to learn)
 ☐ Poor (Resistant to learning)
Comments:

5. Interpersonal Skills

• Teamwork and Collaboration:


 ☐ Excellent (Works very well with
others)
 ☐ Good (Works well with others)
 ☐ Fair (Occasionally struggles in
teamwork)
 ☐ Poor (Frequently struggles in
teamwork)
• Communication Skills:
 ☐ Excellent (Highly effective
communicator)
 ☐ Good (Effective communicator)
 ☐ Fair (Adequate communication
skills
 ☐ Poor (Ineffective communicator)

Comments:

6. Problem-Solving and Critical Thinking

• Ability to Analyze and Solve Problems:


 ☐ Excellent (Highly effective
problem solver)
 ☐ Good (Effective problem solver)
 ☐ Fair (Occasionally effective)
 ☐ Poor (Ineffective problem solver)
• Creativity and Innovation:
 ☐ Excellent (Highly creative and
innovative)
 ☐ Good (Creative and innovative)
 ☐ Fair (Occasionally creative)
 ☐ Poor (Lacks creativity)

Comments:

7. Dependability and Reliability

• Reliability in Completing Tasks:


 ☐ Excellent (Highly reliable)
 ☐ Good (Reliable)
 ☐ Fair (Occasionally reliable)
 ☐ Poor (Unreliable)
• Responsibility and Accountability:
 ☐ Excellent (Highly responsible and
accountable)
 ☐ Good (Responsible and
accountable)
 ☐ Fair (Occasionally responsible)
 ☐ Poor (Lacks responsibility)

Comments:

8. Customer Service and Interaction (if applicable)

• Professionalism with Customers:


 ☐ Excellent (Highly professional)
 ☐ Good (Professional)
 ☐ Fair (Occasionally professional)
 ☐ Poor (Unprofessional)
• Effectiveness in Meeting Customer Needs:
 ☐ Excellent (Highly effective)
 ☐ Good (Effective)
 ☐ Fair (Occasionally effective)
 ☐ Poor (Ineffective)

Comments:
9. Safety and Compliance

• Adherence to Safety Procedures:


 ☐ Excellent (Always adheres to
safety procedures)
 ☐ Good (Usually adheres to safety
procedures)
 ☐ Fair (Occasionally adheres to
safety procedures)
 ☐ Poor (Frequently disregards safety
procedures)
• Compliance with Company Policies:
 ☐ Excellent (Always compliant)
 ☐ Good (Usually compliant)
 ☐ Fair (Occasionally compliant)
 ☐ Poor (Frequently non-compliant)

Comments:

10. Overall Performance

• Overall Rating:
 ☐ Excellent
 ☐ Good
 ☐ Fair
 ☐ Poor

Strengths:
1.
2.
3.

Areas for Improvement:


1.
2.
3.

Future Recommendations

• Would you recommend this student for a permanent position if applicable?


 ☐ Yes
 ☐ No
 ☐ Undecided

Reason for Recommendation:

Supervisor Signature:
Date:

You might also like