Volume 9, Issue 7, July – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology

ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUL1311

Analysis of Standard Time Calculations Using the

Direct Stopwatch Time Study Method on Line
Deburing Pt. Mikuni Indonesia
Trima Fatwa Afghoni1; Dwi Indra Prasetya2; Agus Suwarno3; Tri Ngudi Wiyatno4
Industrial Engineering Study Program, Faculty of Engineering, Pelita Bangsa University
Jl. Kalimalan g Inspection No. 9 Cibatu, Bekasi 17530

Abstract:- Measuring working time is an attempt to PT. Mikuni Indonesia is a company that operates in the
determine the length of working time required by a trained automotive industry, both two-wheeled and four-wheeled,
employee to complete a job at a normal speed level. To with the final product being a Trothle Body. PT. Mikuni
increase work efficiency for employees, both time and Indonesia is located in the MM2100 area, Jl. Irian Block QQ-
energy, research was carried out to determine time 1, West Cikarang, Bekasi. Trothel Body produced by PT.
Standard ds, time allowances and output Standard ds for Mikuni Indonesia has ADC12 series aluminum material. All
the company, so that the production process runs better. products produced by PT. Mikuni Indonesia has 19 Trothel
In this research, the time for each process will be measured Body Types. In the production process there are two work
with a stopwatch, which will then be used to calculate stations, namely the Die Casting machine and Deburing.
cross-production balance. The results of the work where based on the results carried out by the author, it was
measurement research on the deburing line show that the found that there was a quite significant increase in daily
ideal planning that should be set by management for each production planning in the deburing process in the last three
product is 07K for 8 working hours, namely 987 pcs and months. The increase in daily planning occurred due to the
1233 for 10 working hours, 3DM for 8 working hours, change in Die Casting management at the beginning of 2024
namely 764 pcs and 955 for 10 Working hours, 01Y for 8 who wanted to increase productivity in the Die Casting
working hours, namely 868 pcs and 1085 pcs for 10 Department, but the work measurement was carried out by
working hours, 01D for 8 working hours, namely 810 and management only once, precisely in February 2024. However,
1012 pcs for 10 working hours, 01S for 8 working hours, management continued to increase the daily production
namely 820 pcs and 1025 pcs for 10 working hours, 5SM planning every month without carry out work measurements
for 8 working hours, namely 849 pcs and 1061 pcs for 10 again(Latief et al., 2021).
working hours, 457 for 8 working hours, namely 294 pcs
and 368 pcs for 10 working hours, 874 for 8 working hours, The purpose of measuring working time is to obtain the
namely 784 pcs and 980 pcs for 10 working hours, and 908 Standard d time that must be achieved by workers to complete
1-C for 8 working hours, namely 634 pcs and 792 pcs for a job. To determine incentives, plans, placement of the
10 working hours. required number of workers, production schedules, to
calculate output and input, you can use the Standard d Time
Keywords:- Pengukuran Waktu Kerja, Direct Stopwatch Time basis. The most important factor in ensuring the smooth
Study. production process is labor, but other important factors also
have a significant influence on the production process such as
I. INTRODUCTION equipment, machines and so on(Nur Rahmanti Ratih et al.,
2022).
Measuring working time is a job of observing and
recording working time on a phase or cycle scale using  Product tivitas
predetermined methods and instruments. Work measurement In general, productivity is defined as the relationship
is an application of techniques that have been included in the between real or physical results in the form of goods or
plan and functions to help the company determine results that services and actual input. Productivity also means a
meet demand that can be provided by human resources comparison between the results achieved and the total
carrying out the manufacturing stage. Measurements with resources used (input), which are related to a productive
accurate data can become work Standard ds that can be used mental attitude, including: regarding attitude, spirit,
by a company to determine the minimum targets that must be motivation, discipline, creativity, innovation, dynamic and
achieved by workers. However, problems often arise in the professionalism. Robbins and DeCenzo explain that
work measurement process, such as: varying work periods, productivity is the entire output of goods and services
inaccurate data collection and also a lack of understanding produced divided by the input required to produce that output.
about work measurement itself(Arianie & Puspitasari, 2017). Productivity is a combination of people and operating
variables. Therefore, an effective organization will maximize
productivity by successfully integrating people into the entire
operating system(Cut Ita Erliana, ST, 2015).

IJISRT24JUL1311 www.ijisrt.com 3164

Volume 9, Issue 7, July – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUL1311

 Measuring Working Time occur in the production process. This map depicts the most
Work measurement is a science that studies the principles complete graphical picture of the entire process. The formation
and techniques to obtain the best work system design. This of a flow process map according to Wignjosoebroto (2009) is
science is one of the sciences in the industrial engineering the operational process of the process being studied, a general
discipline, even judging from its history, work measurement is process map of each component is obtained, the operational
the forerunner of this discipline. In its application, work process map is drawn again on the line corresponding to the
measurement will interact with various other sciences within component, and all the desired data is entered on the side of
the industrial engineering discipline to simultaneously achieve the symbol, such as the description. , distance, quantity, time,
the optimal state of a production system in the broadest sense costs, and so on, are studied on the resulting map to enable
of the word, namely a system consisting of human improvements to the entire process, linkages between
components, materials, machines, equipment and money. As a activities, independent processes, and so on(Wahyudi et al.,
science, work measurement has its own framework with parts 2023).
that are together integrated to achieve the above goals. This
work measurement was developed by F.W. Taylor and F.B.  Flow Proses Chart
Gilbreth. Based on research from F.W. Taylor and F.B. Process Flow Map is a diagram that shows the sequence
Gilbreth, although the research was not carried out together, of operations, inspection, transportation, waiting and storage
was later known as a unit and was known as Work Design or that occur during a process, and it also contains the
Methods Engineering. This design is carried out by paying information needed for analysis such as the time required and
attention to technological, psychological and sociological distance of movement (Teknik et al., 2024)
aspects of work so that a work system is obtained that is more
in line with human abilities and limitations(Prayuda, 2020). II. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

 Direct Stopwatch Time Study The type of research used by researchers is quantitative.
In the context of work measurement, the direct stop- Quantitative research methods are usually used when
watch Time Study method is a work measurement technique researchers want to obtain accurate data, based on empirical
using a stop-watch as a tool for measuring time shown in the and measurable phenomena. By using this type of quantitative
completion of an observed activity (actual time). The time that research, the researcher will present data in the form of
is successfully measured and recorded is then modified by numbers in the form of the duration of working time for each
considering the operator's work tempo and adding an product work activity. In this research, researchers carried out
allowance. To facilitate future measurement and analysis the deburing process at PT. Mikuni Indonesia as a research
activities, in addition to the stop-watch as a timing device, a object. The deburing process is the process of removing part
Time Study form is needed to record the measured time data. lines in a product(Purbasari, 2020).
Apart from recording time, you must also record all
information related to the activity being measured, such as A. Normality and Uniformity of Data
sketches of work area layouts, working conditions (machine The data uniformity test aims to ensure that the data taken
working speed, product images, operator names, etc.) and does not contain extreme data, all data falls within the upper
descriptions related to elemental breakdown. Measurement control limits (BKA) and lower control limits (BKB).
and recording usually use a continuous method (the stopwatch
does not need to be stopped every time an element or work  Formula to find Upper Control Limit (BKA) and Lower
cycle has finished being measured). The work activities to be Control Limit (BKB) values
measured must first be divided into detailed work elements.
By observing the activities to be measured, then measuring the  BKA = Average Observation Time + (Z x Standard d
time needed to complete each work element is measured and Deviation)
recorded. The time read from the stopwatch (which moves  BKB = Average Observation Time – (Z x Standard d
continuously) is then recorded in the "record" column (R). For Deviation)
each work element of each work cycle that is recorded,
calculations are carried out at the end of the study. The actual  Desired Confidence Level 95%, jadi Z = 1.96
time for each work element is then recorded in the "Time"
column (T)(Cut Ita Erliana, ST, 2015). Table 1 Desired Confidence Level
Desired Confidence Level Z Value
 Operation Process Chart
90% 1.65
Operation Process Chart (OPC) is a diagram that
95% 1.96
describes the process steps that raw materials will undergo
95.4% 2.00
regarding the sequence of operations and inspections from the
beginning until it becomes a complete finished product or as a 99% 2.58
component, and also contains the information needed for 99.7% 3.00
further analysis. carry on. So in an Operation Process Chart
(OPC), only operational and inspection activities are recorded,  Source:
sometimes at the end of the process a record is recorded If the Upper Control Limit (BKA) and Lower Control
regarding the storage of the Operation Process Chart (OPC). Limit (BKB) values have been determined then the work
This is used to analyze the flow of material operations that measurement value which is not more than BKA and more

IJISRT24JUL1311 www.ijisrt.com 3165

Volume 9, Issue 7, July – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUL1311

than BKB can be said to be the work measurement value which s = Degree of accuracy
meets Data Uniformity.
xi = Observation data
B. Data Sufficiency Test
A data adequacy test is needed to ensure that the data that n = Number of observation data
has been collected and presented in the measurement report is
objectively sufficient. The following is the formula used to test If n' ≤ n then the data is considered sufficient, but if n` ≥
the level of data adequacy. n the data is considered insufficient (insufficient) and
additional data needs to be added.
𝑘
⌈ √𝑛(∑ 𝑥𝑖 2 )−(∑ 𝑥𝑖)2⌉ 2
.𝑛′ = 𝑠
∑ 𝑥𝑖 C. Performance Rating
Performance Rating aims to determine operator
Equation Formula 1 performance with the aim of normalizing working time. There
are four factors that influence the Performance rating, namely:
Where Skill, Effort, Condition and Consistency. The following is the
value of each factor that influences the Performance Rating
n’ = Number of theoretical data calculated based on the Westinghouse system(Asarela & Sari,
2023).
k = Constant level of confidence in observations

Table 2 Performance Rating Dengan Sistem Westinghouse

Skill Effort Conditions Consistency
Superskill +0.15 Excessive +0.13 Ideal +0.06 Perfect +0.03
Superskill +0.13 Escessive +0.12 Excellent +0.04 Excellent +0.03
Excellent +0.11 Excellent +0.10 Good +0.02 Good +0.02
Excellent +0.8 Excellent +0.8 Average +0.0 Average +0.0
Good +0.6 Good +0.5 Fair - 0.03 Fair - 0.03
Average +0.0 Average +0.0 Poor - 0.07 Poor - 0.04
Fair - 0.5 Fair - 0.4
Fair - 0.10 Fair - 0.8
Poor - 0.16 Poor - 0.12
Poor - 0.22 Poor - 0.17

 Source: E. Standard d Time

Operator ratings are based on normal performance with Standard d Time is the time required for a trained worker
the following concepts: to complete a particular task, working at a continuous rate and
Normal PR =1 Better PR < 1 Worse PR > 1 using certain methods, machines, equipment and work
arrangements(Bloom & Reenen, 2013).
Using the Westing House System's rating method, there
are four assessments of adjustment factors that can influence  The following are Calculations to Determine Standard d
operator performance, namely ability, effort, condition and Time:
consistency. Determining these adjustment factors should be
done by a supervisor or someone who really understands the 100%
employee's job(Prahadita et al., 2021). 𝑤𝑠 = 𝑤𝑁𝑥 ( )
100% − 𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑤𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒%
D. Allowance So the result is Standard d Time (AWS) in Seconds per unit.
Allowance is a factor or percentage of allowance given
to workers so that they can work comfortably, because every F. Output Standard d
worker will always have fatigue factors, both personal and Output Standard d is the number of units that can be
delay(Buku Product tivitas Kerja Dr. Candra Wijaya, M.Pd, produced in a specified time unit (seconds, minutes, hours).
n.d.). The following are the allowance factors needed by Here's how to determine Standard d Output:
workers:
1
 Personal needs (drinking, going to the toilet etc.) 𝑂𝑠 = ( ): 20 𝑥 3600
𝑥̅ 𝑤𝑠
 Fatigue/Fatigue
 Delays (Unavoidable & Avoidable) Then the value (Standard d Output) Is in units per hour

A reasonable amount of allowance is around 10 – 15%

IJISRT24JUL1311 www.ijisrt.com 3166

Volume 9, Issue 7, July – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUL1311

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A. Data Collection
Data collection was carried out at the Deburing Line of the Die Casting Department of PT. Mikuni Indonesia on 13-18 May
2024 with measurements carried out 10 times using a stopwatch on superior products produced by PT Mikuni Indonesia.

Table 3 Jenis Product

No. Stations Kode Produk
1 07K
DC1
2 3DM
3 01Y
DC2
4 01D
5 01S
DC3
6 5SM
7 457
DC4
8 05A
9 908 1-C
SAV
10 874
Source: Company Data, 2024

The measurement process is carried out by notifying the operator so that working time samples are taken under normal
conditions, not accelerated or slowed down.

Table 4 Working Time Data Table

LINE DEBURING
PENGUKURAN
DC1 DC2 DC3 DC4 SAV
KERJA
07K 3DM 01Y 01D 01S 5SM 457 05A 874 908 1-C
1 24,5 31,8 27,3 29,7 28,6 27,7 82,5 75,8 30,2 37,5
2 24 31 27,8 29,9 29 28,2 83 76 30 37,8
3 24,8 32 27,2 30 28,8 27,8 82,7 76,3 30,5 37,8
4 24,8 31,7 28,2 29,8 28,7 27,8 83 75,7 30,2 37,6
5 24,5 31,6 27,9 29,8 28,8 28,2 82,9 75,8 30,6 38
6 24,7 31,8 28,6 29,7 28,9 28,2 83,2 75,7 30,3 37,8
7 24,5 31,9 27,6 29,9 29,3 27,8 82,8 75,9 30,9 37,5
8 24,6 31,7 27,8 30,2 29,2 27,8 82,8 76 30,5 37,9
9 24,7 31,9 27,8 29,7 29 27,9 82,9 75,8 30,6 38
10 24,8 31,8 27,7 30,2 28,9 28 83,3 76,2 30,3 37,8
Rata-rata 24,59 31,72 27,79 29,89 28,92 27,94 82,91 75,92 30,41 37,77
Std. Deviasi 0,24 0,28 0,40 0,19 0,21 0,20 0,23 0,20 0,26 0,18
Z Value 1,65 1,65 1,65 1,65 1,65 1,65 1,65 1,65 1,65 1,65
BKA 24,99 32,18 28,46 30,21 29,27 28,26 83,29 76,26 30,84 38,07
BKB 24,19 31,26 27,12 29,57 28,57 27,62 82,53 75,58 29,98 37,47
Uji Ksrgmn Seragam Seragam Seragam Seragam Seragam Seragam Seragam Seragam Seragam Seragam
Uji kecukupan 0,0026 0,0018 0,0035 0,0014 0,0017 0,0017 0,0002 0,0002 0,0019 0,0008
Source: Data Processed, 2024

B. Data Adequacy Test work element of each operational process each has 10 data.
The results of measurements of the work elements in the This time measurement research uses an accuracy level of 10%
throttle body production process will first be analyzed to fulfill and a confidence level of 90%, so the values s = 0.1 and k =
the data adequacy check. Data adequacy checks are necessary 1.6, meaning that in collecting this data the maximum deviation
because the data obtained when measuring working time is not is only 10%. From the calculation of the data adequacy test
always consistent. The high diversity of data in initial using the formula in equation (3.1), the data is sufficient for
observations (n) will also influence the observations that must further calculations because the value n' < n is 00.2 < 10. The
be taken (n') which are also high. Measurement of working time specific calculation can be seen in the attached sheet.
has been carried out on each work element with n = 10 initial
observations carried out on each work element, so that each

IJISRT24JUL1311 www.ijisrt.com 3167

Volume 9, Issue 7, July – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUL1311

C. Data Uniformity Test D. Determination of Adjustment Factors

Data uniformity testing is intended to identify data and Working time measurements have met the adequacy
eliminate extreme data in working time measurements. assumptions and data uniformity assumptions. The next step is
Existing extreme data makes the results obtained invalid, so if to determine the adjustment factor. The objective obtained
it is proven that there are results with extreme data then the data from determining the adjustment factor is that by determining
must be discarded. The use of individual control charts is used the adjustment factor, the reasonableness of the work
for individual observations where n = 1. Measurement of demonstrated by the operator will be known, meaning whether
working time for each work element is included as individual the operator of each operating process has worked under
observation. The following are the results of analysis using normal conditions or not. Using the Westing House System's
individual control charts in the Minitab application. rating method, there are four assessments of adjustment factors
that can influence operator performance, namely ability, effort,
condition and consistency. Determining this adjustment factor
should be done by a supervisor or someone who really
understands the employee's work. The following is the
adjustment factor value for each operator.

Table 5 Performance Rating with System Westinghouse

The data listed in the table for skill and effort was E. Allowance
provided by the Die Casting Supervisor who knows very well PT. Mikuni Indonesia determines that the Overall
how his employees work and perform, while for condition and Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) time for each department is
consistency it was obtained from the researcher's observations. 85%, meaning that 15% of the total working time is used as
allowance time, assuming the following calculations:
The way to calculate the adjustment factor using this
system is to add up the four factors with the value of each factor Total Working Time = 10 Hours or 600 Minutes
in the table, after that if the total for each factor still shows a
positive value then the performance rating value will be added 600 Minutes x 85% = 510 Minutes
to p = 1 and if the total for each -each factor shows a negative
value, then p = 1 will be added to the negative value. So the Total Time Allowance = 90 Minutes
performance rating value will be less than 1. If the performance
rating is equal to 1 then the worker is working in good condition Assuming 40 minutes for personal needs, 30 minutes for
but if the performance rating is less or more than 1 then the fatigue and 20 minutes for easing other obstacles.
worker is working in poor condition

IJISRT24JUL1311 www.ijisrt.com 3168

Volume 9, Issue 7, July – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUL1311

F. Cycle Time Table 8 Cycle Time Product 01S and 5SM

∑ 𝑥𝑖 DC 3
Ws = 𝑛 01S 5SM
Table 6 Cycle Time Product 07K and 3DM Ranti Aulia Ranti Aulia
DC 1 28,6 28,9 27,7 27,7
07K 3DM 29 28,8 28,2 28,2
Rheynata Devita Rheynata Devita 28,8 29,2 27,5 27,8
24,5 24,3 31,8 31,8 28,7 28,8 27,8 27,8
24 24,2 31,4 31
28,8 28,8 28,2 28,2
24,8 24,5 31,8 32
28,9 29,3 28,2 28,2
24,8 24,7 31,8 31,7
24,5 24,5 31,7 31,6 29,3 28,6 27,6 27,8
24,7 24,6 31,9 31,8 29,2 28,7 27,8 27,8
24,5 24,6 31,7 31,9 29 29,1 27,9 27,9
24,6 24,7 32 31,7 28,9 28,8 28 28
24,7 24,6 31,8 31,9 ∑xi ∑xi ∑xi ∑xi
24,8 24,7 31,7 31,8 289,2 289 278,9 279,4
∑xi ∑xi ∑xi ∑xi ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥
245,9 245,4 317,6 317,2 𝑠 = 𝑠 = 𝑠 = 𝑠 =
𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛
∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥
𝑠 =
𝑛
𝑠 =
𝑛
𝑠 =
𝑛
𝑠 =
𝑛
28,92 28,9 27,89 27,94
Source: Data Processed, 2024
24,59 24,54 31,76 31,72
Source: Data Processed, 2024 Table 9 Cycle Time Product 457 and 05A

Table 7 Cycle Time Product 01Y and 01D

DC 4
DC 2 457 05A
01Y 01D Agnes Melia Agnes Melia
Melda Selvi Melda Selvi 82,5 75,8
27,3 27,4 29,5 29,7 83 76
27,8 27,8 29,7 29,9 82,7 76,3
27,2 27,4 29,8 30 83 75,7
28,2 28,2 29,7 29,8 82,9 75,8
27,9 27,9 29,8 29,8 83,2 75,7
28,6 28,6 29,9 29,7
82,8 75,9
27,6 27,8 30 29,9
82,8 76
27,8 27,8 30 30,2
82,9 75,8
27,8 27,9 29,8 29,7
27,7 28 29,9 30,2 83,3 76,2
∑xi ∑xi ∑xi ∑xi ∑xi ∑xi
277,9 278,8 298,1 298,9 829,1 759,2
∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥
𝑠 = 𝑠 = 𝑠 = 𝑠 = 𝑠 = 𝑠 =
𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛

27,79 27,88 29,81 29,89 82,91 75,92

Source: Data Processed, 2024 Source: Data Processed, 2024

IJISRT24JUL1311 www.ijisrt.com 3169

Volume 9, Issue 7, July – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUL1311

Table 10 Cycle Time Product 874 and 908 1-C Table 12 Normal Time Product 01Y and 01D
SAV ∑xi ∑xi ∑xi ∑xi
874 908 1-C 277,9 278,8 298,1 298,9
Tuti Siti Tuti Siti ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥
𝑠 = 𝑠 = 𝑠 = 𝑠 =
𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛
30,2 30,7 37,5 37,5
30 30,6 37,7 37,8 27,79 27,88 29,81 29,89
PR=1+PR PR=1+PR PR=1+PR PR=1+PR
30,5 30,5 37,8 37,8
1
1,02 1
1,02
30,2 30,8 37,6 37,6
Wn Wn Wn Wn
30,6 30,7 37,8 38
27,79 28,4376 29,81 30,4878
30,3 30,4 37,9 37,8 Ws Ws Ws Ws
30,9 30,4 38 37,5 32,79 33,56 35,18 35,98
30,5 30,8 37,6 37,9 Source: Data Processed, 2024
30,6 30,7 37,7 38 Table 13 Normal Time Product 01S and 5SM
30,3 30,7 37,8 37,8 ∑xi ∑xi ∑xi ∑xi
∑xi ∑xi ∑xi ∑xi 289,2 289 278,9 279,4
304,1 306,3 377,4 377,7 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥
𝑠 = 𝑠 = 𝑠 = 𝑠 =
∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛
𝑠= 𝑠= 𝑠= 𝑠=
𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 28,92 28,9 27,89 27,94
30,41 30,63 37,74 37,77 PR=1+PR PR=1+PR PR=1+PR PR=1+PR
Source: Data Processed, 2024 1,03 1,03 1,03 1,03
Wn Wn Wn Wn
G. Normal Time
29,7876 29,767 28,7267 28,7782
 Wn = Ws x Performance Rating
Ws Ws Ws Ws
Table 11 Normal Time Product 07K and 3DM 35,15 35,13 33,90 33,96
∑xi ∑xi ∑xi ∑xi Source: Data Processed, 2024

245,9 245,4 317,6 317,2 Table 14 Normal Time Product 457 and 05A
∑xi ∑xi
∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥
𝑠= 𝑠= 𝑠= 𝑠= 829,1 759,2
𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛
∑𝑥 ∑𝑥
24,59 24,54 31,76 31,72 𝑠= 𝑠=
𝑛 𝑛
PR=1+PR PR=1+PR PR=1+PR PR=1+PR 82,91 75,92
1,02 11,02 1 PR=1+PR PR=1+PR
Wn Wn Wn Wn 1 1
25,0818 24,54 32,3952 31,72 Wn Wn
Ws Ws Ws Ws 82,91 75,92
29,51 28,87 38,11 37,32 Ws Ws
Source: Data Processed, 2024 Source: Data Processed, 2024

IJISRT24JUL1311 www.ijisrt.com 3170

Volume 9, Issue 7, July – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUL1311

Table 15 Normal Time Product 874 and 908 1-C Table 18 Standard Time 01S and 5SM
∑xi ∑xi ∑xi ∑xi ∑xi ∑xi ∑xi ∑xi
304,1 306,3 377,4 377,7 289,2 289 278,9 279,4
∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥
𝑠 = 𝑠 = 𝑠 = 𝑠 = ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥
𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 𝑠 = 𝑠 = 𝑠 = 𝑠 =
𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛
30,41 30,63 37,74 37,77
28,92 28,9 27,89 27,94
PR=1+PR PR=1+PR PR=1+PR PR=1+PR
1,02 1,02 1,02 1,02
PR=1+PR PR=1+PR PR=1+PR PR=1+PR
Wn Wn Wn Wn 1,03 1,03 1,03 1,03
31,0182 31,2426 38,4948 38,5254 Wn Wn Wn Wn
Ws Ws Ws Ws 29,7876 29,767 28,7267 28,7782
36,60 36,87 45,42 45,46 Ws Ws Ws Ws
Source: Data Processed, 2024 35,15 35,13 33,90 33,96
Source: Data Processed, 2024
H. Standard d Time
100% Table 19 Standard Time 457 and 05A
Ws = 𝑤𝑛 100%−15%
∑xi ∑xi
Table 16 Standard d Time 07K and 3DM 829,1 759,2
∑xi ∑xi ∑xi ∑xi ∑𝑥
∑𝑥
245,9 245,4 317,6 317,2 𝑠= 𝑠=
𝑛 𝑛
∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥
𝑠 = 𝑠 = 𝑠 = 𝑠 =
𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 82,91 75,92
24,59 24,54 31,76 31,72 PR=1+PR PR=1+PR
PR=1+PR PR=1+PR PR=1+PR PR=1+PR 1 1
1,02 11,02 1 Wn Wn
Wn Wn Wn Wn
82,91 75,92
25,0818 24,54 32,3952 31,72
Ws Ws Ws Ws Ws Ws
Source: Data Processed, 2024
29,51 28,87 38,11 37,32
Source: Data Processed, 2024 Table 20 Standard Time 874 and 908 1-C

Table 17 Standard Time 01Y and 01D ∑xi ∑xi ∑xi ∑xi
∑xi ∑xi ∑xi ∑xi 304,1 306,3 377,4 377,7
277,9 278,8 298,1 298,9 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥
𝑠= 𝑠= 𝑠= 𝑠=
∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛
𝑠 = 𝑠 = 𝑠 = 𝑠 =
𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛
30,41 30,63 37,74 37,77
27,79 27,88 29,81 29,89
PR=1+PR PR=1+PR PR=1+PR PR=1+PR
PR=1+PR PR=1+PR PR=1+PR PR=1+PR
1,02 1,02 1,02 1,02
1
1,02 1
1,02
Wn Wn Wn Wn Wn Wn Wn Wn
27,79 28,4376 29,81 30,4878 31,0182 31,2426 38,4948 38,5254
Ws Ws Ws Ws Ws Ws Ws Ws
32,79 33,56 35,18 35,98 36,60 36,87 45,42 45,46
Source: Data Processed, 2024 Source: Data Processed, 2024

IJISRT24JUL1311 www.ijisrt.com 3171

Volume 9, Issue 7, July – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUL1311

I. Output Standard Table 24 Output Standard Time 457 and 05A

∑xi ∑xi
Os = 3600 / Ws (perJam)
829,1 759,2
Table 21 Output Standard Time 07K and 3DM ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥
𝑠 = 𝑠 =
∑xi ∑xi ∑xi ∑xi 𝑛 𝑛
245,9 245,4 317,6 317,2 82,91 75,92
∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥
𝑠 = 𝑠 = 𝑠 = 𝑠 = PR=1+PR PR=1+PR
𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛
1 1
24,59 24,54 31,76 31,72
Wn Wn
PR=1+PR PR=1+PR PR=1+PR PR=1+PR
1,02 1 1,02 1 82,91 75,92
Wn Wn Wn Wn Ws Ws
25,0818 24,54 32,3952 31,72 97,83 89,59
Ws Ws Ws Ws Os Os
29,51 28,87 38,11 37,32 37 40
Os Os Os Os Source: Data Processed, 2024
122 125 94 96
Source: Data Processed, 2024 Table 25 Output Standard Time 874 and 908 1-C
∑xi ∑xi ∑xi ∑xi
Table 22 Output Standard Time 01Y and 01D
304,1 306,3 377,4 377,7
∑xi ∑xi ∑xi ∑xi
∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥
277,9 278,8 298,1 298,9 𝑠 = 𝑠 = 𝑠 = 𝑠 =
∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛
𝑠 = 𝑠 = 𝑠 = 𝑠 =
𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛
30,41 30,63 37,74 37,77
27,79 27,88 29,81 29,89
PR=1+PR PR=1+PR PR=1+PR PR=1+PR
PR=1+PR PR=1+PR PR=1+PR PR=1+PR
1 1,02 1 1,02 1,02 1,02 1,02 1,02
Wn Wn Wn Wn Wn Wn Wn Wn
27,79 28,4376 29,81 30,4878 31,0182 31,2426 38,4948 38,5254
Ws Ws Ws Ws
Ws Ws Ws Ws
32,79 33,56 35,18 35,98
Os Os Os Os
36,60 36,87 45,42 45,46
110 107 102 100 Os Os Os Os
Source: Data Processed, 2024 98 98 79 79
Source: Data Processed, 2024
Table 23 Output Standard Time 01S and 5SM
∑xi ∑xi ∑xi ∑xi
289,2 289 278,9 279,4
∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥 ∑𝑥
𝑠 = 𝑠 = 𝑠 = 𝑠 =
𝑛 𝑛 𝑛 𝑛

28,92 28,9 27,89 27,94

PR=1+PR PR=1+PR PR=1+PR PR=1+PR
1,03 1,03 1,03 1,03
Wn Wn Wn Wn
29,7876 29,767 28,7267 28,7782
Ws Ws Ws Ws
35,15 35,13 33,90 33,96
Os Os Os Os
102 102 106 106
Source: Data Processed, 2024

IJISRT24JUL1311 www.ijisrt.com 3172

Volume 9, Issue 7, July – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUL1311

Table 26 Calculation of Standard d Output Based on Working Hours

OUTPUT STANDAR DEBURING
DC1 DC2 DC3 DC4 SAV
07K 3DM 01Y 01D 01S 5SM 457 05A 874 908 1-C
8 Jam 8 Jam 8 Jam 8 Jam 8 Jam
987 764 868 810 820 849 294 321 784 634
10 Jam 10 Jam 10 Jam 10 Jam 10 Jam
1233 955 1085 1012 1025 1061 368 402 980 792
Source: Data Processed, 2024

IV. CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS B. Suggestions

A. Conclusions  Based on the Research Benefits Identified, here are some

The conclusion from the research results of measuring Suggestions:
working time using the Time Study stopwatch method on the
Deburing line for cycle time, normal time and Standard d time  For Researchers
respectively is cycle time 24.56 seconds, normal time 24.81
seconds and Standard d time 29.18 seconds for product 07K,  It is necessary to improve the ability to implement
cycle time 31.74 seconds, normal time 32.05 seconds and knowledge from lectures in real situations and try other
Standard d time 37.71 seconds for 3DM products, cycle time relevant methods to take into consideration for work
27.83 seconds, normal time 28.11 seconds and Standard d time measurement in order to obtain efficient working time.
33.17 seconds for product 01Y, cycle time 29.85 seconds,  Continuing more in-depth research into various work
normal time 30.14 seconds and Standard d time 35.57 seconds measurement methods and how these methods can be
for product 01D, time cycle 28.91 seconds, normal time 29.77 adapted to specific needs and conditions in various types of
seconds and Standard d time 35.13 seconds for product 01S, industry.
cycle time 227.91 seconds, normal time 28.75 seconds and
Standard d time 33.92 seconds for product 5SM, cycle time  For Companies
82.91 seconds, normal time 82.91 seconds and Standard d time
97.83 seconds for product 457, cycle time 75.92 seconds,  Use the results of this research as a guide to improve the
normal time 75.92 seconds and Standard d time 89.59 seconds work measurement process in the future.
for product 05A, cycle time 30.52 seconds, normal time 31.13  Periodically evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of
seconds and Standard d time 36.72 seconds for product 874, the current work process. Use the results of this evaluation
cycle time 37.75 seconds, normal time 38.51 seconds and time to make continuous improvements and ensure that work
Standard d 45.44 Seconds for product 908 1-C. processes are always at an optimal level in accorandce with
operational needs.
Meanwhile, the Standard d Output in one hour is 123 pcs
for 07K products, 95 pcs for 3DM products, 109 for 01Y  For Universities
products, 101 pcs for 01D products, 102 pcs for 01S products,
106 pcs for 5SM products, 37 pcs for 457 products. 40 pcs for  Make the results of this research additional material for
product 05A, 98 pcs for product 874 and 79 pcs for product 908 literature discourse, both at the faculty and university level.
1-C.  Using this research as additional material for research and
learning references at Pelita Bangsa University.
Thus, the ideal planning that should be set by
management for each product is 07K for 8 working hours, REFERENCES
namely 987 pcs and 1233 for 10 working hours, 3DM for 8
working hours, namely 764 pcs and 955 for 10 working hours, [1]. Arianie, G. P., & Puspitasari, N. B. (2017).
01Y for 8 working hours. namely 868 pcs and 1085 pcs for 10 PERENCANAAN MANAJEMEN PROYEK DALAM
working hours, 01D for 8 working hours, namely 810 and 1012 MENINGKATKAN EFISIENSI DAN EFEKTIFITAS
pcs for 10 working hours, 01S for 8 working hours, namely 820 SOURCE DAYA PERUSAHAAN (Studi Kasus :
pcs and 1025 pcs for 10 working hours, 5SM for 8 working Qiscus Pte Ltd). J@ti Undip : Jurnal Teknik Industri,
hours, namely 849 pcs and 1061 pcs for 10 working hours, 457 12(3), 189. https://doi.org/10.14710/jati.12.3.189-196
for 8 working hours, namely 294 pcs and 368 pcs for 10 [2]. Asarela, S., & Sari, R. P. (2023). Analisis Pengukuran
working hours, 874 for 8 working hours, namely 784 pcs and Kerja Menentukan Waktu Baku Menggunakan Metode
980 pcs for 10 working hours, and 908 1-C for 8 working hours, Jam Henti Terhadap Operator Persiapan Komponen
namely 634 pcs and 792 pcs for 10 working hours. (Studi Kasus: PT XYZ). Jurnal Serambi Engineering,
8(3), 6479–6486. https://doi.org/10.32672/jse.
v8i3.6315

IJISRT24JUL1311 www.ijisrt.com 3173

Volume 9, Issue 7, July – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUL1311

[3]. Bloom, N., & Reenen, J. Van. (2013). Pengukuran

Kerja Direct Stopwatch Time-Study. NBER Working
Papers, 89. http://www.nber.org/papers/w16019
[4]. Buku Product tivitas Kerja Dr. Candra Wijaya, M.Pd.
(n.d.).
[5]. Cut Ita Erliana, ST, M. (2015). Analisa dan Pengukuran
Kerja. In Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Guru Sekolah
Dasar (Vol. 6, Issue August).
[6]. Latief, A., Famalya Melu, P., Halid Lahay, I., &
Hasanuddin. (2021). Pengukuran Waktu Kerja
Karyawan pada Pengemasan Es Kristal Menggunakan
Metode Time Study. JAMBURA INDUSTRIAL
REVIEW Annisa Latief Dkk, 1(2), 48–57.
https://doi.org/10.37905/jirev.1.2.48-57
[7]. Nur Rahmanti Ratih, Hazzel Mellya Nanda, & Putri
Awalina. (2022). Penerapan Perencanaan Product si
Untuk Meningkatkan Efisiensi Dan Efektivitas Product
si Di Era New Normal Pada Home Industry Ar Bakery
Nganjuk. GEMILANG: Jurnal Manajemen Dan
Akuntansi, 2(4), 46–68. https://doi.org/10.56910/
gemilang.v2i4.140
[8]. Prahadita, R. M., Sari, S. N., & Hermawan, A. (2021).
Penjadwalan Menggunakan Metode Pert Pada Proyek
Peningkatan Jalan Mekar Mukti-Cibarusah, Jawa Barat,
Bekasi. Civil Engineering, Environmental, Disaster &
Risk Management Symposium (CEEDRiMS)
Proceeding, 2003, 354–361.
[9]. Prayuda, S. (2020). Analisis Pengukuran Kerja Dalam
Menentukan Waktu Baku Untuk Meningkatkan Product
tivitas Kerja Pada Product si Kerudung Menggunakan
Metode Time Study Pada Ukm Lisna Collection Di
Tasikmalaya. Jurnal Mahasiswa Industri Galuh, 1(1),
120–126.
[10]. Purbasari, A. (2020). Pengukuran Waktu Baku Pada
Proses Pemasangan Ic Program Menggunakan Metode
Jam Henti. PROFISIENSI: Jurnal Program Studi
Teknik Industri, 8(2), 116–128.
https://doi.org/10.33373/profis.v8i2.2805
[11]. Teknik, F., Bangsa, U. P., Hidayat, I., Sari, M. V.,
Deviani, N. D., Prasetyo, Y., Wiyatno, T. N., Studi, P.,
Industri, T., Teknik, F., & Bangsa, U. P. (2024).
Analisis Pengukuran Kerja Pada Mesin Air Leak
Dengan Metode Pengukuran Waktu Jam Henti ( Studi
Kasus : PT . XYZ ). 3(1), 177–184.
[12]. Wahyudi, R., Nugraha, A. T., & Kinasih, A. S. (2023).
Penentuan Waktu Baku dengan Stopwatch Time Study
untuk Pengukuran Kerja Operator di PT XYZ Lampung
Tengah. Jurnal Sains Dan Aplikasi Keilmuan Teknik
Industri (SAKTI), 3(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/
10.33479/jtiumc.v3i2.76

IJISRT24JUL1311 www.ijisrt.com 3174