ENDING FEMICIDE.

SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND EDUCATION.

DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS.
UNIT NAME: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY.
UNIT CODE: BEC 2312
GROUP ASSIGNMENT
LECTURER: DR. DAVID NJOROGE

GROUP MEMBERS

NO NAME ADMISSION NUMBER

1. GRACE AJIAMBO BE108/G/11095/20
2. MUNDU FILEX BE108/G/11101/20
3. EUGENE ONYANGO ASWANI BE108/G/11361/20
4. NAKHANU LOISE ANGELA BE108/G/11377/20
5. CELESTINE NALIAKA BE108/G/11244/20

1|Page
 ENDING FEMICIDE.

RESEARCH TOPIC.

ENDING GENDER-RELATED KILLING OF WOMEN AND GIRLS (FEMICIDE/FEMINICIDE); UNDERSTANDING

THE SOCIETAL DYNAMICS AND PROPOSING PREVENTIVE MEASURES.

INDEPENDENT VARIABLE.

The Independent Variable is Societal Dynamics and Preventive Measures on femicide.

DEPENDENT VARIABLE.

The Dependent Variable is the Incidence of Femicide.

SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES.

The specific objectives in our study are;

 To analyze the societal dynamics contributing to the occurrence of femicide.

 To assess the prevalence and patterns of femicide in the targeted population.
 To investigate the effectiveness of existing preventive measures against femicide.
 To propose evidence-based preventive measures to mitigate and ultimately end femicide.

RESEARCH QUESTIONS.

The Research Questions are;

 What are the societal dynamics that contribute to the occurrence of femicide?
 What is the prevalence and pattern of femicide in the targeted population?
 How effective are current preventive measures in reducing femicide?
 What evidence-based preventive measures can be proposed to mitigate and end femicide?

Certainly, let's provide additional clarification on the research questions for the study on ending
femicide.

What are the societal dynamics that contribute to the occurrence of femicide?

This question aims to delve into the various factors within society that contribute to the occurrence of
femicide. It involves an exploration of cultural norms, legal frameworks, economic factors, and gender
power dynamics to identify the root causes and contextual influences.

What is the prevalence and pattern of femicide in the targeted population?

This question focuses on understanding the scope and characteristics of femicide within the targeted
population. It involves analyzing statistical data to determine the prevalence of femicide and examining
patterns such as demographic trends, methods employed, and the relationship between perpetrators
and victims.

2|Page
 ENDING FEMICIDE.

How effective are current preventive measures in reducing femicide?

This question evaluates the impact of existing preventive measures against femicide. It involves a
critical assessment of interventions at various levels, including individual empowerment, community
support, legal reforms, and cultural shifts. Effectiveness will be measured based on documented
outcomes and reductions in femicide rates.

What evidence-based preventive measures can be proposed to mitigate and end femicide?

- This question aims to generate recommendations for evidence-based preventive measures. Drawing
on the findings from the analysis of societal dynamics and the assessment of current interventions, this
question seeks to propose comprehensive strategies that address the multifaceted nature of femicide.
These measures may span educational programs, legislative reforms, community initiatives, and cultural
awareness campaigns.

NULL HYPOTHESES.

Null Hypotheses are;

 There is no significant relationship between societal dynamics and the occurrence of femicide.
 The prevalence and pattern of femicide do not differ significantly across demographic factors.
 Existing preventive measures do not have a significant impact on reducing femicide.
 There are no significant differences in the effectiveness of preventive measures based on
demographic factors.

Let’s provide additional clarification on the research questions for the study on ending femicide.

There is no significant relationship between societal dynamics and the occurrence of femicide.

This hypothesis posits that societal dynamics have no impact on the incidence of femicide, challenging
the assumption that broader cultural, economic, and legal factors play a role in fostering an
environment conducive to femicide.

The prevalence and pattern of femicide do not differ significantly across demographic factors.

This hypothesis questions whether demographic characteristics such as age, socio-economic status, and
geographic location have any bearing on the prevalence and patterns of femicide, challenging the notion
that these factors contribute to variations in femicide rates.

Existing preventive measures do not have a significant impact on reducing femicide.

This hypothesis challenges the effectiveness of current preventive measures, suggesting that
interventions at the individual, community, and societal levels do not contribute to a meaningful
reduction in femicide rates.

3|Page
 ENDING FEMICIDE.

There are no significant differences in the effectiveness of preventive measures based on demographic
factors.

This hypothesis questions whether the impact of preventive measures is consistent across diverse
demographic groups, challenging the assumption that certain interventions may be more or less
effective depending on factors such as age, socio-economic status, or geographic location.

By systematically addressing these research questions and testing the null hypotheses, the study aims to
provide a comprehensive understanding of femicide, evaluate the efficacy of existing interventions, and
propose evidence-based measures to contribute to the global efforts to end femicide.

POPULATION OF THE STUDY.

The population of the study will include individual’s affected by or vulnerable to femicide, encompassing
diverse demographic backgrounds, geographical locations, and socio-economic statuses. It is imperative
to consider the diversity within this population, as femicide is a complex social issue that transcends
various demographic backgrounds, geographical locations, and socio-economic statuses. The inclusion
criteria for the study involve individuals who have experienced or are at risk of femicide, acknowledging
the diversity of experiences and circumstances surrounding this form of gender-based violence.

Demographic Backgrounds:

The study will consider individuals across diverse demographic characteristics, including age, ethnicity,
race, socioeconomic status, and educational background. Understanding how these demographic
factors intersect with the risk of femicide is crucial for tailoring preventive measures to specific groups.

Geographical Locations:

Femicide is not confined to a specific geographic area; it occurs globally. Therefore, the study will aim to
include participants from various regions, urban and rural settings, and countries. Geographic diversity
allows for a more comprehensive understanding of how cultural, legal, and social factors contribute to
femicide.

Socio-Economic Status:

Economic disparities often intersect with experiences of violence. The study will consider individuals
across different socio-economic strata to explore how economic factors, such as financial dependence or
independence, impact vulnerability to femicide.

4|Page
 ENDING FEMICIDE.

Cultural Contexts:

Cultural norms and values significantly influence societal attitudes towards gender roles and violence.
The research will encompass individuals from different cultural backgrounds, acknowledging the
importance of understanding the cultural dynamics that contribute to or mitigate femicide.

Victims, Survivors, and Those at Risk:

The population will include individuals who have experienced femicide, survivors of attempted femicide,
and those deemed at risk based on various indicators. This inclusive approach allows for a nuanced
exploration of the continuum of experiences related to femicide.

The goal of considering this diverse population is to capture the complexities of femicide and inform
preventive measures that are tailored to the specific needs and challenges faced by different groups. By
recognizing the intersecting factors that contribute to femicide within these diverse contexts, the study
aims to contribute valuable insights for the development of evidence-based interventions and policies
aimed at ending femicide across various societal dimensions.

PROBABILITY SAMPLING TECHNIQUES.

The probability sampling techniques used in the study are;

Stratified Random Sampling:

The population will be divided into strata based on relevant demographic factors such as age, socio-
economic status, and geographic location. Random samples will then be drawn from each stratum to
ensure representation from various subgroups.

Quota Sampling:

Participants will be selected based on predetermined quotas for specific demographic characteristics,
ensuring a proportional representation of different groups within the population. This method allows for
targeted inclusion of diverse perspectives.

Snowball Sampling:

Starting with a small group of participants who meet the inclusion criteria and then asking them to refer
others who also meet the criteria. This method is particularly useful when studying hard-to-reach
populations or sensitive topics such as femicide, as it relies on existing social networks and trust
relationships to recruit participants. However, it may introduce biases if certain subgroups are
overrepresented in the initial sample.

INSTRUMENTS OF DATA COLLECTION.

Surveys and interviews.

Collecting qualitative and quantitative data from survivors, families, law enforcement, and community
members to understand their perspectives and experiences on the same.

5|Page
 ENDING FEMICIDE.

Case studies and Legal Analysis.

Examining past femicide cases and legal responses to identify patterns, gaps, and areas for
improvement.

RESEARCH DESIGN.

Longitudinal Study Design:

Considering the dynamic nature of femicide and its prevention efforts, a longitudinal study design may
be employed to track changes and trends in femicide rates, prevention strategies, and intervention
outcomes over time. Longitudinal data collection allows for the assessment of the long-term
effectiveness and sustainability of implemented strategies and the identification of emerging challenges
and opportunities for intervention.

Multi-Level Analysis:

Adopting a multi-level analysis approach to examine femicide from various levels of analysis, including
individual, interpersonal, community, and societal factors. This approach acknowledges the complex
interplay of factors contributing to femicide and allows for a comprehensive understanding of its
determinants and implications for prevention and intervention.

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK.

Estimated number of female victims of intimate partner/family-related homicide, by region (2022)

Source: UNODC estimates based on UNODC femicide Dataset.

6|Page
 ENDING FEMICIDE.

REFERENCES
1. McFarlane, J., Campbell, J. C., Wilt, S., Sachs, C. J., Ulrich, Y., & Xu, X. (1999).

Stalking and intimate partner femicide. Homicide Studies, 3(4), 300–316.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767999003004003

2. Femicide: The Politics of Woman Killing. (1994). Australian and New Zealand Journal

of Criminology, 27(2), 210–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/000486589402700212

3. Taylor, R., & Jasinski, J. L. (2011). Femicide and the feminist perspective. Homicide

Studies, 15(4), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767911424541

7|Page