App 002
App 002
Steps in paraphrasing:
MODULE 3: Lesson title: Stating the Thesis Statement and Textual Evidence
Thesis statements
– It is a sentence or two that tell/s the reader your topic and what you say about it
e.g. Biological need, social environment, and psychological satisfaction are three
reasons why people take risks.
Textual evidence
– It is a piece of evidence from a text that you can use to illustrate your ideas and
support your arguments. All textual evidence should:
● Support a specific point
● Be cited with a page number at the end of the sentence
● Be followed by a “connection” that explains the relationship of the evidence to
your main point.
Direct (stated) Thesis Outline the main idea and the organization of
Statement the essay for the reader
Indirect (Implied) Thesis Introduce the topic, but they do not outline the
Statement supporting ideas
Critique Paper
● Formal analysis and evaluation of a text, production, or performance.
● Can be a self-critique or a critique of someone else's work.
Content of the Critique/Reaction Paper
● Accurate: Provides a clear and correct description of the work.
o Includes basic details (who, what, when, where, why).
● Evaluative: Offers an overall judgment of the work.
o Supports judgment with multiple evaluations of specific elements.
● Balanced: Presents both strengths and weaknesses of the work.
Parts of a Critique Paper
Introduction
● Name, date, and creator of the work.
● Describe the work's main argument or purpose.
● Explain the context of the work's creation.
● Conclude with a hint of your overall evaluation (positive, negative, or mixed).
Summary
● Briefly summarize the main points of the work.
● Objectively describe how the creator portrays these points using techniques,
styles, media, characters, or symbols.
Critical Evaluation
● Systematically assess different elements of the work.
● Evaluate how well the creator achieved the purpose through these elements.
● Identify both strengths and weaknesses.
● Consider questions like:
o Who is the creator? Objective or subjective?
o What are the aims? Were they achieved?
o What techniques were used? Effective or not?
o What assumptions underlie the work? Affect validity?
o What evidence is used? Fair interpretation?
o How is the work structured? Effective?
o Does the work enhance understanding of key ideas?
● Write in formal academic style with logical presentation.
Conclusion
● State overall evaluation of the work.
● Summarize key reasons for the evaluation.
● May include recommendations for improvement (optional).
Reference List
● Include all cited sources.
● Follow the required referencing style.