Training Tutorial - 1
Training Tutorial - 1
patents.
1. What is a Patent.
2. What is a difference between patent and patent application.
3. How to get a patent.
4. What are different components in a US patent.
5. Who can apply for a patent
6. Prior Art Search
a. Type of prior art searches
b. How to conduct a prior art search on patent database
c. Why to conduct a prior art search
d. Who need a prior art search
7. What is Novelty and Patentability Search
8. What is Invalidity Search
9. What is Freedom to Operate Search
10. What is Landscape Analysis
11. What is Evidence of Use search and claim chart analysis
Intellectual Property Rights: A Focus on Patents
- Introduction to Patents:
A patent is a form of intellectual property that gives its owner the legal right to exclude others from
making, using, selling, and importing an invention for a limited period of years, in exchange for
publishing an enabling public disclosure of the invention. Patents are a part of the broader category
of intellectual property rights, which also includes trademarks, copyright, and industrial design
rights.
Patent: A granted patent provides the rights to exclude others from commercializing the invention
for a limited period, typically 20 years from the filing date of the application.
Patent Application: A document that an individual or company submits to a patent office to request
a patent for an invention. Until granted, it does not provide any protection or rights to exclude
others from making use of the invention.
3. Prepare a patent application, which includes a detailed description of the invention and claims
defining the scope of the invention.
4. Submit the application to the relevant patent office (e.g., USPTO in the United States).
5. Go through the examination process, where a patent examiner reviews the application to
determine if it meets all legal requirements.
6. Respond to any objections or requests for amendment from the patent office.
- Components of a US Patent
2. Specification: Detailed description of the invention, enabling others skilled in the art to make and
use the invention.
- Individuals, companies, or entities that have invented something new, useful, and non-obvious.
- Types: Novelty search, validity search, patentability search, freedom to operate search.
- Conducting a Search: Use patent databases (e.g., USPTO, EPO, WIPO) to find existing patents and
published applications. Consider non-patent literature and products on the market.
- Purpose: To determine if the invention is new and to understand the existing technology
landscape.
- Who Needs It: Inventors, companies looking to file a patent application, or assess the risk of patent
infringement.
- Focuses on finding prior art that might affect the novelty and non-obviousness of an invention.
- Essential before filing a patent application to assess the likelihood of obtaining a patent.
- Conducted to challenge the validity of an existing patent or to defend against a patent infringement
allegation.
- Searches for prior art that the patent office may have overlooked during the examination process.
- Determines whether a product or process may infringe on the patent rights of others.
- Important for companies before launching new products or entering new markets.
- Landscape Analysis
- Helps companies understand the competitive environment, identify trends, and make strategic
decisions.
- Claim charts compare specific claims of a patent against a potentially infringing product or process,
highlighting the overlap.
Conclusion:
Understanding patents and the processes related to them is crucial for protecting and leveraging
intellectual property. Through effective use of patents, inventors and companies can secure their
inventions, foster innovation, and gain a competitive edge in the marketplace.
Exercise 2: Read and learn about US Patent Attorney, their qualification, who can be a patent
attorney, what is a difference between Patent Attorney and Attorney at Law.
- Patent Prosecution
- Patent Infringement
- Patent Litigation
Patent-related legal cases can be broadly categorized into several types, each focusing on specific
issues within the realm of intellectual property law. These cases are critical for maintaining the
balance between innovation, competition, and public interest. Here are the main types of patent-
related cases:
These involve a patent holder alleging that another party is making, using, selling, or importing their
patented invention without permission. Infringement can be direct, indirect, or contributory, and
the outcomes can range from injunctions against the infringer to monetary damages for the patent
holder.
In these cases, the validity of a patent is questioned. Defendants in infringement suits often
counterclaim that the patent in question should not have been granted due to issues like lack of
novelty, obviousness, or insufficient disclosure. Courts can invalidate patents if they find such claims
to be true.
These disputes arise during the patent application process, where an application may be rejected
based on the patentability of the subject matter. Disagreements can also occur in opposition
proceedings, where third parties challenge the grant of a patent by the patent office.
These cases involve disagreements over patent licensing agreements. Issues may include royalty
rates, scope of the license (such as which patents are included and geographic limitations), and
breach of contract terms.
An inter partes review is a trial proceeding conducted at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to
review the patentability of one or more claims in a patent only on the basis of prior art consisting of
patents or printed publications. It's a common way for a third party to challenge the validity of a
patent post-grant.
Though not directly patent cases, disputes over trade secrets can intersect with patent law,
particularly when a party is accused of using stolen trade secrets to obtain a patent.
These cases involve patents within the context of antitrust law, focusing on whether a patent
holder's actions extend beyond the scope of the patent rights in a way that harms competition.
Examples include tying arrangements, price fixing, and exclusive licensing that unjustifiably limits
competition.
In these proactive legal actions, an entity seeks a court's declaration regarding the rights and legal
obligations concerning a patent, such as whether their product infringes on a patent or if a patent is
invalid, without waiting for the patent holder to file an infringement lawsuit.
In the United States, the ITC can investigate and adjudicate cases involving imported goods that
allegedly infringe on U.S. patents. Remedies can include exclusion orders to prevent infringing
products from being imported into the U.S.
Each type of case plays a crucial role in the patent system, affecting how patents are obtained,
enforced, and challenged. This system aims to encourage innovation while ensuring that
technological advancements remain accessible to the public.