Meki Report
Meki Report
By:Lencho Hirpa
Table of Contents
List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................. iii
List of Maps .................................................................................................................................................... iii
List of Tables .................................................................................................................................................. iv
CHAPTER ONE ..................................................................................................................................................1
1.1. Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................1
1.2. Statement of the Problem .........................................................................................................................3
1.3. Objective...................................................................................................................................................3
1.3.1. General objective ...............................................................................................................................3
1.3.2. Specific Objectives ............................................................................................................................3
1.4. Scope of Study..........................................................................................................................................4
CHAPTER TWO .................................................................................................................................................6
2. Review Literature ............................................................................................................................................6
2.1. Spatial Planning ........................................................................................................................................6
2.2. Planning Theories .....................................................................................................................................7
2.2.1. Traditional Planning Theories ............................................................................................................7
2.3. Urban Structure ........................................................................................................................................9
2.4. Evolution of Urban Planning ....................................................................................................................9
2.5. Urbanization .......................................................................................................................................... 10
2.5.1. Forms of Urbanization .................................................................................................................... 11
2.6. Land use Planning ................................................................................................................................. 11
2.6.1. Five Sustainable Urban Planning Principles ................................................................................... 14
CHAPTER THREE............................................................................................................................................18
3. Detail Existing Land Use Analysis ...............................................................................................................18
3.1. Road Network, Transportation .............................................................................................................. 19
3.2. Residential ............................................................................................................................................. 20
3.3. Commerce, Business and Trade ............................................................................................................ 21
3.4. Administration ....................................................................................................................................... 22
There are different existing administrative offices, Government and Non-Government institutions
occupying larger areas located along the collector roads. ......................................................................... 22
3.5. Services ................................................................................................................................................. 23
3.6. Recreational and Environmental ........................................................................................................... 24
3.7. Manufacturing and Storage ................................................................................................................... 25
i
3.8. Conclusion of Existing Land Use Analysis ........................................................................................... 26
CHAPTER FOUR ..............................................................................................................................................28
4. Vision, Concept, Proposal and Implementation Strategy ..............................................................................28
4.1. Vision of Meki town .............................................................................................................................. 28
4.2. Conceptual Development ...................................................................................................................... 28
4.3. Proposed land use and Land Budgeting ................................................................................................ 29
4.3.1. Mixed and Residence ...................................................................................................................... 30
4.3.2. Commerce, Business and trade ....................................................................................................... 33
4.3.3. Administration ................................................................................................................................ 36
4.3.4. Social Service.................................................................................................................................. 37
4.3.5. Municipal Services.......................................................................................................................... 40
4.3.6. Recreational and Environmental Sensitive Areas ........................................................................... 41
4.3.7. Urban Agriculture ........................................................................................................................... 42
4.3.8. Manufacture & Storage ................................................................................................................... 42
4.3.9. Road Network, Transportation & Utilities ...................................................................................... 43
4.4. Conclusion of the proposed Land Use of the town................................................................................ 45
CHAPTER FIVE................................................................................................................................................48
5. Implementation Strategies of the Proposed Land Use of the town Structure Plan .......................................48
5.1. Purpose of the Implementation Strategy ............................................................................................... 48
5.2. Development of implementation tools .................................................................................................. 49
5.2.1. Institutional set up ........................................................................................................................... 49
5.2.2. Legal Institutional Setup for Implementation ................................................................................. 50
5.3. Guiding Principles for Plan Implementation ......................................................................................... 50
1. Major Contents of Land use Categories and Prohibited uses ......................................................... 53
3. Standard of Markets for Commercial and Trade Activities ............................................................... 55
ii
List of Figures
Figure 1.1: Data and Analysis Methods ................................................................................................................ 4
List of Maps
Map 1: Morphology of Meki Town ...................................................................................................... 19
Map 2: Meki Town Existing Residential Map ...................................................................................... 21
Map 3: Meki Town Existing Commerce and Business Map ................................................................ 22
Map 4: Meki Town Existing Administrative Land use Map ................................................................ 23
Map 5: Meki Town Existing Service Map ............................................................................................ 24
Map 6: Meki Town Existing Recreational Environmental Map ........................................................... 25
Map 7:Meki Town Existing Manufacturing and Storage Map ............................................................. 26
Map 8: Conceptual Map........................................................................................................................ 29
Map 9: Meki Town Proposed Mixed and Residential Map .................................................................. 32
Map 10: Meki Town Proposed Commerce and Business Map............................................................. 34
Map 11: Meki Town Proposed Administration Map ............................................................................ 37
Map 12: Meki Town Proposed Service Map ........................................................................................ 39
Map 13: Meki Town Proposed Recreational and Environmental Map ................................................ 41
Map 14: Meki Town Proposed Urban Agriculture Map ....................................................................... 42
Map 15: Meki Town Proposed Manufacture and Storage Map ............................................................ 43
Map 16: Meki Town Proposed Transportation Map............................................................................. 45
Map 17: Meki Town Proposed General Land Use Map ....................................................................... 47
iii
List of Tables
Table 1: Existing land use area summary ........................................................................................................... 26
Table 2: Existing Land Use and Standard ........................................................................................................... 30
Table 3: Existing Land Use Area Summary ....................................................................................................... 47
Table 4 Major Contents of Land use Categories and Prohibited uses ................................................................ 53
Table 5: standard for size determination land use ............................................................................................... 55
Table 6: Standard for Education service ............................................................................................................. 57
Table 7: Standard for Health Institutions ............................................................................................................ 58
Table 8: Standards and Norms for Football Fields ............................................................................................. 60
Table 9: Level of Services, Requirement, and Location of Local Administration ............................................. 61
Table 10: Standards for Manufacturing Activities / Industry ............................................................................. 62
Table 11: Standard for Warehouses .................................................................................................................... 63
iv
v
CHAPTER ONE
1.1. Introduction
Urbanization is a global phenomenon that is transforming human settlements. The shift from
primarily rural to more urban societies is evident through the transformation of places, populations,
economies, and the built environment. In each of these dimensions, urbanization is unprecedented for
its speed and scale: massive urbanization is a megatrend of the 21st century. With disorienting speed,
villages and towns are being absorbed by, or coalescing into, larger urban conurbations and
agglomerations.
Peri-urban areas, where there is a rising demand of land for non-agricultural or urban land uses and
located at the receiving end of urbanization, form tenure hotspots. It is increasingly evident that peri-
urban areas are now becoming places where a lot of changes and activities are taking place due to
rapid urbanization and population growth (Wehrmann, 2008, Cotula and Neve, 2007). Rapid
urbanization has been the main theme of urban studies in developing countries since the explosion of
rates of growth in the 1960's and 1970's in very large cities (Barros, 2004).
Urban Planning: „It is the design and regulation of the uses of space that focus on the physical form,
economic functions, and social impacts of the urban environment and on the location of different
activities within it. Because urban planning draws upon engineering, architectural, and social and
political concerns, it is variously a technical profession, an endeavor involving political will and
public participation, and an academic discipline. Urban planning concerns itself with both the
development of open land (greenfield sites) and the revitalization of existing parts of the city, thereby
involving goal setting, data collection and analysis, forecasting, design, strategic thinking, and public
consultation.‟ Britannica Encyclopedia
(Source: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/619445/urban-planning).
Urban planning is a discipline of land-use organization that considers the physical, spatial,
infrastructural, environmental, and socio-economic and governance issues of an urban center. It is an
important development and management tool because it helps: make urban centers conducive living
and working spaces; use scarce resources efficiently; consider environmental issues; evenly distribute
urban services and facilities; tackle socio-economic issues; promote balanced and healthy urban
development; and ensure the essence of good governance.
Urban planning is also popularly known as Town Planning. It encompasses many different
disciplines attempts to accomplish sustainable, user-friendly, economic and social organization of all
elements of a town, city or any other urban environment. It has to take care of the residents‟ housing,
employment, recreation, trade and business, sanitation, mobility and communication besides
preserving the natural and built heritage of the place.
Urban planning is a technical and political process concerned with the development and design of
land use and the built environment, including air, water, and the infrastructure passing into and out of
urban areas, such as transportation, communications, and distribution networks. Urban planning is a
valuable force for urban leaders to achieve sustainable development. It is a means to bring about a
difference; Planning helps make the most out of municipal budgets by informing infrastructure and
services investments, balancing demands for growth with the need to protect the environment.
Urban development enables human communities to expand the amount of space available to them
even as the surface of planet Earth appears to be more finite than ever. Future urban planning must
address the factors shaping twenty-first century cities, including: firstly, the environmental challenges
of climate change and cities‟ excessive dependence on fossil fuel driven cars; secondly, the
demographic challenges of rapid urbanization, shrinking cities, ageing and increasing multicultural
composition of cities; thirdly, the economic challenges of uncertain future growth and fundamental
doubts about market-led approaches that the current global financial crisis have engendered, as well
as increasing informality in urban activities; increasing socio-spatial challenges, especially social and
spatial inequalities, urban sprawl, unplanned per-urbanization and the increasing spatial scale of
cities; and finally, institutional challenges related to governance and changing roles of local
government.
Urban planning is an activity carried out to guide socioeconomic and spatial developments of a
planning area. In principle a planning task takes as its prime goal the objective of the people who
inhabit the area that is being planned. However, due to the longevity and spatial dispersion of effects
of plans, planners should consider the interests of various stakeholders (both current and future) over
an area greater than the jurisdiction of a single urban area.
2
Urban planning can and should play a significant role in overcoming governance fragmentation in
public policy formulation and decision-making, since most national and local development policies
and related investments have a spatial dimension.
Urban planning seeks to be efficient (make optimal use of resources), effective (create, desired and
meaningful impacts and outcomes), and also seeks to enhance equity (of opportunity, rights and
power, especially with regard to gender). To achieve these „3Es‟ of good planning practice, decision-
makers need a solid foundation of information and direction that can be provided by urban planning.
The planning period of the town structure plan has been completed,
To deal with the new technology that is being introduced,
To accommodate the new urban development policy directions,
To fill the land use gaps those has been observed and, make it relevant to the present day
needs as well as the future
1.3. Objective
Analysis of existing road network and existing land use distribution and their compatibility
Analysis of distribution of existing social service Administration and other general land use.
Propose road network according to their hierarchy
Propose Land use according to input from study and standard
Propose Social Service and environmental and recreational area.
1.5. Methods and Materials
4
Main Findings of the existing streets network and land uses
The main findings of the existing Transport and streets networks are: -
5
CHAPTER TWO
2. Review Literature
It is relevant to differentiate between the three distinct but related concepts of structure plan, city or
town structure and urban growth. The Structure Plan is a binding technical, institutional and policy
framework for guiding the long-term social, economic, environmental and spatial development of the
city or town and its surrounding. The Structure Plan has location-specific standards to guide future
planning and implementation, and ordinances to safeguard its implementation. Together with
important documents describing contexts and proposals, the Structure Plan clearly indicates the
required institutions to lead planning and implementation.
City Structure is the collective name given to major determinants of the spatial frame that are
essentially the backbone (streets, centers, green and main transport axis) of a city or town. They are
major structuring elements influencing the spatial growth as well as movement of people. History
tells us that there are two approaches of urban spatial structure formation. The movement and
interaction of people was the major structuring factor of old towns. On the other hand, it is nowadays
believed that urban centers themselves are being shaped by planners who guide the form of
movement and interaction of people. Facts show that the rebuilding of cities is a continuous process;
new urban (economic, social and political) phenomena affect the formation of city structure.
6
2.2. Planning Theories
The most important of these other traditions include incremental planning, transactive planning,
advocacy planning, and radical planning. These by no means exhaust the range of contemporary
planning traditions, but they cover enough ground to illustrate the major developments in planning
theory and practice since roughly 1960, developments which have grown up in response to
recognized deficiencies in the synoptic approach.
7
2.2.1.3. Advocacy Planning
The most influential of the 1960s challenges to rational planning came from a Hunter College
professor who had worked with poor communities in Philadelphia and New York and believed in
their lack of representation in the planning process.
Paul Davidoff‟s (1965) article, “Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning,” resonated with the frustration
of many planners in their inability to meaningfully address the social and economic issues tearing at
the fabric of American cities. Davidoff called for the distribution of planning services into low-
income, minority neighborhoods through a cadre of advocate planners who would be physically
located in neighborhoods and would represent the interests of neighborhood residents in city-level
planning processes.
Planning consists less of field surveys and data analyses, and more of interpersonal dialogue marked
by a process of mutual learning transactive planning also refers to the evolution of decentralized
8
planning institutions that help people take increasing control over the social processes that govern
their welfare.
Urban Planning metamorphosed into its modern form owing to the Industrial Revolution, with the
advent of machines, new construction technology and cars. The Scale of a town underwent
tremendous expansion in terms of having wider roads, taller buildings, spread out cities due to
extensive railroad networks, huge industries etc.
Planning gained popularity in the mid-to-late 19th century, when it became obvious that there should
be some kind of plan or larger goals for the growth of big cities like New York, London, and Paris
etc.
9
2.5. Urbanization
Urbanization refers to the population shift from rural to urban areas, "the gradual increase in the
proportion of people living in urban areas", and the ways in which each society adapts to the change.
More than half the population of the world is now urban and the numbers are increasing at a swift
pace. Here, it becomes important to know how a population is classified as being „urban‟, as opposed
to being rural or tribal or any other type. The simplest definition of an urban population is that of a
population residing in towns and cities.
Population size
Population density
Economic base
Presence of a municipal body
Urbanization is the steady increase in the number of people living in cities or urban centers. These
occurrences result from the continuous mass movement of people from the villages or rural
settlements to cities or urban areas. It can also result from natural increase (the excess of births over
deaths) especially where this population increase take place in areas where advance technology and
developmental projects are present.
According to UN population projection (2012), the urbanization rate of Ethiopia is 3.6%. With this
pace, the level of urbanization will only be 36% in 2050. The spatial distribution of urban centers is
unbalanced, and there is a large disparity between the levels of urbanization among the various
regions. Urban Personality and collective behavior it is largely through the activities of the voluntary
groups be their objectives economic, political, educational, religious, recreational, or cultural, that the
urbanite expresses and develops his personality, acquires status, and is able to carry on the round of
activities that constitute his life career. In 2008, for the first time, half the world‟s population was
living in towns and cities. By 2030, the urban population will reach 5 billion i.e., 60 per cent of the
world‟s population. Nearly all population growth will be in the cities of developing countries, whose
population will double to nearly 4 billion by 2030 about the size of the developing world‟s total
population in 1990. (Source: World Urbanization Prospects: the 2005 Revision UNDP).
10
2.5.1. Forms of Urbanization
Different forms of urbanization can be classified depending on the style of architecture and planning
methods as well as historic growth of areas.
The right place being the place with the necessary infrastructures, location, physical and
environmental qualities and segregation of incompatible land uses whereas proportional mix of
compatible land uses. Selection of the right place is subjective and it needs the government
intervention in the form of planning to avoid the conflict between individual decision and collective
community action (Turkstra, 2006).
There are four major competing land use values important in land use planning. These are: economic
development values, environmental protection values, equity values and livability values. Land use
plans prepared by the active participation of stakeholders with different values of land use brings
these competing values into collaboration using their interdependence and regulations (Brke,
Godschalk, and Kaiser, 2006). The location of urban activities and the interaction among them forms
the spatial structure of urban centers (Turkstra, 2006). Generally, there are four considered spatial
structures formed by such interactions among land uses. These are: conventional low-density
development, smart growth, new urbanism and sustainable development. These days the last three has
gained more acceptance (Brke, Godschalk and Kaiser, 2006).
11
Land use planning is a tool to support the orderly occupation and use of land and to avoid adverse
developments. It primarily relies on an evaluation of the land potential and on the alternative patterns
of its use - including the physical, social and economic conditions which affect that use - for the
purpose of selecting the most appropriate use. Its main aim is to select and choose the option(s) which
meet(s) best the needs, and to draw up a policy for its sustained use. Land use planning does not stand
on its own, but constitutes an intermediate step between land evaluation and land management. While
land evaluation primarily identifies and rates the land potential and recommends alternative use
scenarios, land UNESCO – EOLSS SAMPLE CHAPTERS LAND USE, LAND COVER AND SOIL
SCIENCES – Vol Willy H. Varghese ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) use planning
focuses more on effective
It is a decision-making process that "facilitates the allocation of land to the uses that provide the
greatest sustainable benefits" Land use planning should be based on the following principles
Land use planning is a cross-sectorial and integrative decision-making process that facilitates
the allocation of land to the uses that give the greatest sustainable benefit (Haub, 2009).
Urban land use is the spatial distribution or geographical pattern of urban land use functions,
which includes residential, administration, commercial, services, transportation and
communication, industrial, recreation and formal-green, forest and informal green, urban
agriculture and special or other functions.
In Ethiopia the present land use pattern is the result of three factors, namely climate,
topography and population size distribution and cultural orientation and practices (UNDP,
FAO 1989).
1. Land use planning aims at sustainability balancing social, economic and environ- mental
needs;
2. Land use planning results in a legally binding land use plan and/or legally binding land use
rules. Formal recognition of the land use plan or land use rules is crucial for its
implementation.
3. Land use planning is integrated into state institutions having the official mandate for
intersectoral planning. This can be realized in different ways. The planning can be initiated
and facilitated by a local administrative body.
12
4. Land use planning is an all-inclusive process. This requires that all stakeholder groups are
represented: local direct and indirect users, public authorities, private.
5. Land use planning is based on stakeholder differentiation and gender sensitivity. To identify
all relevant stakeholders, a gender differentiated analysis of all actors should be done in
advance.
6. Land use planning promotes civic engagement. The population should actively participate in
the land use planning.
7. Land use planning is realistic and oriented to local conditions. Not only has the content of a
land use planning to be adapted to local conditions.
8. Land use planning is based on a “light” methodology avoiding unnecessary data collection
resulting in “data graveyards”
9. Land use planning in terms of methodology and content differs e.g., in scale, specificity, form
of participation (direct vs. indirect), and technology at village, municipal and regional level;
10. Land use planning considers and valorizes local knowledge. Rural societies or groups often
possess a complex autochthonous knowledge of their natural environment.
11. Land use planning considers and valorizes local knowledge. Rural societies or groups often
possess a complex autochthonous knowledge of their natural environment.
12. Land use planning takes into account traditional strategies for solving problems and conflicts.
Traditional rural societies have their own way of approaching problems and settling conflicts
concerning land use.
13. Land use planning follows the idea of subsidiarity, i.e. all functions from planning to decision-
making, implementation and monitoring are assigned to the lowest appropriate level of
government in order to be responsive to the needs of citizens and to ensure effective control
from below;
14. Land use planning integrates bottom-up aspects with top-down aspects (“vertical
integration”). Land use planning needs to combine local needs and interests with provisions
made by higher levels.
15. Land use planning is based on inter-disciplinary cooperation and requires sector coordination
(“horizontal integration”). The diverse functions and (potential) uses of land make it necessary
to apply an interdisciplinary approach involving all sectors that have a stake in that area.
13
16. Land use planning is a process leading to an improvement in the capacity of stakeholders. The
participatory methods used in all steps of land use planning promote the technical and
organizational capabilities of all participants, thereby improving their capacity to plan and act.
17. Land use planning requires transparency. If there is no transparency on decisions about future
land uses, risks are high that some people will be deprived of their rights and/or that future
land use will not be sustainable;
18. Land use planning is future-oriented (“visionary”). Land use planning is not only about
mapping the current land uses or land covers. Land use planning determines how the land will
be used in the future.
19. Land use planning is an iterative process. Land use planning is more than the preparation of a
planning document; it is an iterative process. Iteration is both the principle and the method.
20. Land use planning is implementation oriented. Land use planning has to consider how the
negotiated decisions and the solutions identified are to be implemented.
21. Land use planning is linked to financial planning. This is crucial for implementation. Land use
planning needs to be aware of the designated uses of sector budgets as well as of the financial
planning cycles of the relevant sector ministries (including their deadlines).
22. Land use planning relates to spaces and places (“spatial orientation”). In most countries many
forms of planning and quite a number of plans exist. What most of them are lacking is the
relation to space.
14
Mixed-use development is aimed at developing a range of compatible land uses and functions and
provides a cross section of residential, commercial and community infrastructure in a building, block
or neighborhood while reducing the demand for commuter travel by reducing the distances between
the vertices of the so-called „home-work-services‟ triangle, and facilitating agglomeration economies.
Social mix
This principle aims at promoting cohesion and interaction between different social classes in the same
community and to ensure accessibility to equitable urban opportunities by providing different types of
housing. Social mix provides the basis for healthy social networks, which are the driving force of city
life.
Connectivity
Strengthens the physical, social and virtual relationship between people, places and goods. At
regional level, connectivity links centers of production and consumption with the view of
strengthening systems of cities and urban-rural linkages. At city level, connectivity is closely related
to mobility and the permeability of an area.
Regulation.
The proclamation, i.e. “A Proclamation to Provide for Urban Plans (Proclamation No. 574/ 2008)” is
declared in response to the need to regulate and guide urban centers by sound and visionary urban
plans to bring about balanced and integrated national, regional and local development; to create a
favorable and an enabling condition for public and private stakeholders to fully participate in the
process of urban plan initiation, preparation and implementation on the basis of national standards; to
regulate the carrying out of development undertakings in urban centers without detrimental effects to
the general well-being of the community as well as the protection of natural environment; and to
replace existing urban planning laws with a comprehensive legislation which takes into account the
federal structure of government and the central role of urban centers in urban plan preparation and
implementation.
15
Structure Plan (SP) is defined as a legally binding urban plan that consists of graphic documents
along with explanatory texts formulated and drawn at a level of an entire urban boundary of a given
urban center.
A structure plan shall be prepared for urban centers having population number more than 100,000 and
it shall have the following components: balanced social, economic, physical and environmental
growth; linkage of the urban center with its nearby rural hinterlands and other urban centers;
magnitude and growth direction of the urban center; d) principal land use functions; roads and other
infrastructural networks; institutional setup, budget and the implementation scheme have documents
supported by maps and text reports.
During the preparation of structure plan, as a showcase, at least two neighborhood development plans
shall be prepared in two sections of the urban center.
Any structure plan shall be valid for a period of 10 years from the date of its approval.
Structure plan manuals explains that there are three procedural stages namely: -
c) Housing development;
16
e) Urban redevelopment intervention areas of the urban center;
f) Environmental aspects;
g) Industry zone
Framework of Hierarchy of plans in Ethiopian Urban Planning System Currently efforts are
underway to create awareness among the wider public, the various stakeholders and professionals in
Urban Plan Preparation and Implementation Strategy so as to create common understanding on urban
development issues
Land use planning is a tool to support the orderly occupation and use of land and to avoid adverse
developments. It primarily relies on an evaluation of the land potential and on the alternative patterns
of its use - including the physical, social and economic conditions which affect that use - for the
purpose of selecting the most appropriate use. Its main aim is to select and choose the option(s) which
meet(s) best the needs, and to draw up a policy for its sustained use. Land use planning does not stand
on its own, but constitutes an intermediate step between land evaluation and land management. While
land evaluation primarily identifies and rates the land potential and recommends alternative use
scenarios, land UNESCO – EOLSS SAMPLE CHAPTERS LAND USE, LAND COVER AND SOIL
SCIENCES – Vol Willy H. Varghese ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) use planning
focuses more on effective choices, with the basic information at hand amongst the options provided
by the land evaluation process.
17
CHAPTER THREE
The residential settlements are not well defined, irregular streets, dilapidated and deteriorated
building setbacks.
The intermediate areas consist of different types of land uses such as, old residential houses and other
used for various urban functions. Large establishments were also found in these areas and periphery
areas of the town are dominated with residential use. The boundary of the town is marked by the
existing streams at the west and northern part of the town is marked by existence of rolling
topography. The existing land use of the town are taken in detail the above attributes to have a grass
root understanding of the existing spatial configuration of the town which will be treated under
different spatial components.
To study the short comings of the previous development Plan, and adopt the lessons learnt in
terms of land use to the current revision process.
To study the existing land use of the town to identify the main problems and constraints
To identify the existing key environmental problems, their future trends and implications
To propose sustainable solutions for a healthy urban environment and balanced ecology and
proper implementation mechanisms that promote environmental protection.
Identification of the impacts and their implications
Based on detail investigation of existing problems of social and municipal services address the
problems and recommend sites for future requirement.
Analysis of land use share /distribution in hectare and percent to compare with standard
Based on these, conclusions and recommendations for all types of land uses were done.
Urban morphology is the study of urban forms and of the agents and processes responsible for their
transformation over time. Urban form refers to the main physical elements that structure and shapes
18
the city including streets, squares (the public space), street blocks, plots, and buildings, to name the
most important. Determinants of urban form can be determinate by natural force (Topography, Water
resource, Climate, Available construction materials) and manmade Force (Transport terminals,
Economic, Social, Religion and political Organization).
No natural force (topography) challenge in Maqi town but in case the development follows road
network have Characterized related to Linear development which very dangerous for distribution of
social services.
1. Full access control- except providing access connections with public roads, authority to access
control is given to through traffic
2. Partial access control- provides private access connection in addition to the public ones
Basically, all areas of the town are not provided with adequate and reliable road network facilities.
That means the existing road network amenities are not enough to satisfy the need of the residents
and could not expect to bring necessary development in its present situation.
3.2. Residential
The standard percentage share for housing (residence) of the respective structure plan land use for
small and medium towns is from (20 - 24) %. The existing pure residence and mixed use occupies
862.72 hectares that is 26.32% out of the total land use.
Many of the housing land use, there are squatter settlement areas that have been observed at the
periphery of the town which is characterized by scattered housing units, inaccessibility and lack of
open spaces. Furthermore, some incompatible land uses have been identified while updating the
existing land uses of the town (Slaughter house within Residential). In addition, some residential
areas which are developed at the environmental sensitive areas like gorges, inadequate residential
social service, inadequate Play Ground and inadequate social services and inaccessibility. Therefore,
it is vital to take in to consideration the issues discussed here while proposing the general land uses
for the revision of the structure plan of the town. Most residential structures in the town are G+0,
which is dominantly built from wooden and mud construction materials with unorganized pattern
according to their location importance that need planning intervention.
20
Map 2: Meki Town Existing Residential Map
Source: Computed from the existing land use of the town
General Market
The existing General Market has an area of 3.05 hectare which is located at the center of town of and
has good accessibility for communities which come from different area.
21
Cattle Market
The existing cattle market covers 4.54 hectares area is accessible, keeps cattle flow direction and also
compatible.
3.4. Administration
There are different existing administrative offices, Government and Non-Government institutions
occupying larger areas located along the collector roads.
There are different existing administrative offices covering an area of 8.62 hectares that is 0.26 % out
of the existing land use.
22
Map 4: Meki Town Existing Administrative Land Use Map
3.5. Services
1. Social Service
This sector includes numerous Civic Cultural Welfare, Education, Health Municipal Services,
religious institutions Cemeteries and Utility Services Infrastructure that are established at different
levels in different places of urban areas to provide residents and non-residents with the necessary
services.
23
Map 5: Meki Town Existing Service Map
A. Education: There are educational institutions (12 kindergartens, 8 primary schools, 2 high school
and preparatory school within one compound and 1 TEVT College (under construction) in the town.
B. Health: Regarding health services, there are 2 health centers, but no hospital in the town.
C. Municipal services: The existing Abattoir is located in 02 kebele and has 0.29-hectare area that is
below standard; hence the standard for small abattoir is 1-1.5 hectare.
24
Map 6: Meki Town Existing Recreational Environmental Map
25
Map 7:Meki Town Existing Manufacturing and Storage Map
26
8 Special Function SF 356,736.21 35.67 1.09
9 Transportation T 4,287,557.00 428.76 13.07
10 Urban Agriculture UA 15,969,240.11 1,596.92 48.67
Total 3,282.09 100.00
27
CHAPTER FOUR
It‟s simply a statement that guides the development of a structure plan called the envisioning process
and the decisions made throughout the journey.
To see Maki town at the end of 2032 to be a center of Argo-industry processing wealth,
clean and livable for the dwellers.
Goals
Argo-industry processing
Clean Environment
Protecting Greenery
Developing waste management system
28
Vision development
Natural feature of the town
Consider balanced development through center & sub-center approach
Integration or networking
Expansion direction
Compact development
Green development
Consider future development perspective/ comparative advantage of the town
Change the various barriers (manmade & natural) to appropriate land use functions:
Equitable distribution of urban services
29
364.912= 437.89 ha. Existing residential = 863.35ha. Therefore, the total area of land required for
housing for the planning period will be 437.89 + 863.35= 1301.24 hectare.
According to the housing input the land requirement of housing is about 364.912 housing unit, if plot
standards 160 𝒎𝟐, hectare of land for the planning period.
Generally, the General Proposed land use of the town includes Residential both pure and mixed;
Commerce, Business and trade; Administration; Services; Recreational & Environmental Sensitive
Areas; Manufacturing & Storages; Transport, urban agriculture; and special functions. Housing is an
important urban land use class. Housing issues are of paramount importance to all citizens; hence
housing was made a compulsory element in the structure plan.
designated by R1, proposed housing designated by R2, Density areas like condominium houses
designated by R3, and Special housing like real estate which is designated by R4. Accordingly, the
existed land uses which are prone to natural hazards like quarry area, and other environmental
30
sensitive areas were relocated to newly proposed housing areas. Furthermore, some slum residential
areas at the inner center of the town which are characterized by deteriorated housing units,
inaccessibility, and lack of open spaces and overcrowdings of people exercising informal trade
activities; and not comfortable for living were changed to commercial land uses. In doing so by
taking appropriate intervention mechanism during implementation to this slum areas, making
conducive living and working area through the introduction of mixed development for the area.
In addition, Contingencies were introduced in calculating the land budget for this particular land use
category in order to accommodate its non-prohibited contents like local roads, educational services
(Nursery, kindergarten), Health post and clinics, Neighborhood markets ('Gulits') and mini shopping
areas, small scale enterprises, green area, Recreation and entertainment centers, and Small
Administrative and business offices. Taking these elements into consideration while implementing
the land use proposal is very important in making conducive living environment so as to achieve the
sustainability objectives from these respects.
31
Map 9: Meki Town Proposed Mixed and Residential Map
Generally, the land allocated for the housing land use is fairly distributed in all directions of the Town
and it accounts about 1120.68 hectares of land which could be 34.15 % of the total land use budgeted
for the planning period. This figure is according to the new strategy for structure plan preparation (40,
30, and 30). Relocation of farmers and Industries are a challenging task that has to be undertaken to
implement this SP and future prepared and pre prepared LDP projects.
Different scenarios could be considered for relocating the farmers and industries.
For those who want to practice their farming activity, equivalent size of farmland should be
compensated in the nearby areas.
32
For those who seek to change their current occupation, suitable projects should be designed for their
livelihood. Different micro and small-scale activities such as wood and metal works, horticulture and
urban agriculture, weaving and the like could also be alternatives for the farmers. To this end, the
following measures are to be emphasized.
Train the farmers on how to appropriately use their compensated money and how to carry out the
identified MSEs and urban agricultural activities;
Business; and Markets (General market, Cattle market and Guilt). As identified during the situational
analysis, this land use is concentrated at the center of the Town which resulted in the creation of
monocentric characteristics of urban activities that accounts 188.93 hectares or 5.76 % In order to
solve this problem, in addition to the existed a single central business (main center) districts one sub
center which can accommodate lands for different uses of which commercial uses are the one have
been created. They were created based on the criteria set by the standards used for the preparation of
the structure plan.
33
Map 10: Meki Town Proposed Commerce and Business Map
Center: As important multi-functional activity nodes, centers are important structuring elements of
the urban form and land uses. Services are organized hierarchically in centers. The mix of functions:
different uses need to be availed in centers. Although center use will Predominantly consist of office
space and retail facilities; mix of residential area is mandatory.
Density: overall gross residential density is 150 hu/ha in the Main City Centre (MCC). The viable
residence to working area ratio in the MCC ranges from 1:3 to 1:6. The minimum FAR is 10 for the
MCC and 5 for sub-centers. Mobility and transport system: Centers should be walkable districts.
Hence, streets in centers should be pedestrian friendly. The preferred mode of transport to access
centers is mass transit system. Vehicular through movement should be discouraged. Parking facilities
need to be organized in forms of multilevel aboveground or underground parking structures.
34
The streetscape design: Universal accessibility, easy movement and proper pedestrian comfort has
to be given due emphasis. A minimum walkway width of 3m is mandatory. Adequate street furniture
has to be put in place. The street walls, ground floors of buildings need to be highly interactive with
passersby.
Identity and character: attributing or enhancing the peculiar identity of centers through spatial
configuration, vistas, and landmark sites, symbolic architecture has to be considered in the detail
urban design.
Important parameters that need to be considered in local development plan for a center are: -
Generally, to explain before center is a specific geographic location where commercial activities,
trade, important services including administration area located. Theoretically there are many ways of
arranging central locations and the typologies and are often the results of:
Markets
Different market types with different hierarchies are planned throughout the town. Most market areas
are planned as part of commerce. However, in the case of small open markets (Gulits), the market
could be setup with minimum structures like shades and stalls with parking and public toilet. Such
small market could be setup as required by lower-level administrations in a mixed land use.
Livestock markets are located in specific locations by taking into consideration the direction of
livestock flow and future urban growth pattern.
Markets can be categorized as a general markets and Livestock Market. The general market includes
Primary Market, Secondary market, Tertiary Market and open markets. The proposed structure plan
of the town incorporates these markets in addition to other commercial and business activities that
should be incorporated in this particular land use category.
General market
35
Primary market is one of the general market components that should be allocated in the central
business district which can serve the population within 7-10 km of catchment area. Accordingly,
Meki town has one central business district at the central part, and hence it is adequate market for the
town population and surrounding.
Secondary market is other components of the general market which can serve the town population
within 2.5-7 km of the catchment area that should be allocated in or around centers and sub-center
along major roads and near mass transport system. In case of proposing one secondary market (fruit
and vegetables) market.
Livestock Market
The study of the physical sector indicates reveals that there is one cattle market in the town which is
located accordingly the standard and compatibility which means at the periphery of the town.
4.3.3. Administration
According to the new strategy land use category proportion for administration is about 1.2% - 2.8%.
Generally, the land allocated for the administration land use is about 12.66 hectares of land which
could be 0.38 % of the total land use budgeted for the planning period. This figure is according to the
new strategy for structure plan preparation (40, 30, 30). Meki town is different Administration sit
both town administration & woreda administration depending on that proposed different
administration in different direction.
36
Map 11: Meki Town Proposed Administration Map
37
has addressed the issues by distributing the services fairly through the entire town especially at the
periphery of the town.
Education Services
It is one of the social facilities which includes its own details like primary school, secondary schools
(Both high school and Preparatory schools), Special Schools, Technical and vocational school,
College, University and Research Institute. Future requirement of schools is estimated based on
future enrolment and the standard set by Ministry of Education (MoE). Scarcity of land is also
considered. The proposal is taken in to consideration the school age population for reserving lands for
each education facilities and fairly distributed by considering the newly proposed roads for their
accessibility.
38
Map 12: Meki Town Proposed Service Map
Health Services
It is another type of social facilities which includes its own details like Health Post, Health Center,
District Hospital, Specialized hospital and Veterinary. The proposal is taken in to consideration the
number serviced population for reserving lands for each health facilities.
39
The details of this social facility include library, Cinema Hall, theatre, Museum, Cultural center, and
Children and youth center. To overcome the shortage of youth center in that town have to proposed
according to standard with considering the existing and as to get input from historians and spatial
analysis to proposed different cultural center area like museum, cinema hall, cultural center and other
cultural facility places.
A slaughter house or an abattoir cannot be mixed with residence or commerce. This facility should be
built only on land reserved for such purpose by the Structure Plan or in industrial zone.
It should be at least 2km away from sources of water (e.g., deep wells, ponds, lakes, etc.).
Its location should be against the prevailing wind direction of the town. The site should be free from
big trees that may harbor scavenging birds. It is preferable if the slope is about 5% to protect the
facility from rainwater runoff and runoff from the dirty part of the premise.
It should be accessible at least with a compacted gravel collector road. It should be located at least
5km away from runways of airports. It should not be located in expansion areas. Infrastructures such
as water supply, electricity, etc. should be available
Religious Facility
It includes the worship facilities that are needed for different religious institutions. Only schools,
health facilities, home for elderly, feeding center and similar facilities area allowed inside the
compound of a worship place.
The front view of the worship place, which is the view from the main access, should not be
obstructed by a building. The structure for worship place should be constructed at least 10m away
40
from the main street. Generally, the services land use covers about 202.07 hectares from total area of
the town that is 6.16%.
41
4.3.7. Urban Agriculture
Meki town is as one of the most known urban agricultural activities playing a great role. This
includes various agricultural activities like animal fattening, poultry and different farming activities.
Most of horticulture sites are located at the center of the town and becomes incompatible with the
new developments like national railway stations and business area that need to intervention. Most of
the Irrigation sites are distributed over all parts of the town. This urban Agricultural land use covers
345. 69 hectares of the proposed general land use that is about 10.53 %. Of the total coverage.
42
uses. This implies, therefore, that there shall be some rearrangement of such incompatible land uses by the
forthcoming land proposals of the town.
In general roads have two basic traffic service functions. The foremost one is to provide traffic
mobility while the subsequent one is to release access. These two functions in turn have inverse
relationships. The one with deep and long-distance traffic with high and uniform speeds and
43
uninterrupted traffic flows is directly correlated with mobility. Limited pace and episodic flows are
purposes of roads. There are three levels of access controls: -
1. Full access control- except providing access connections with public roads, authority to access
control is given to through traffic
2. Partial access control- provides private access connection in addition to the public ones
3. Unrestricted access control- preference is given to local traffic
The most important factors for planning road networks of urban centers are the followings: -
Traffic considerations
Land use features
Physical and topographic features
Social and environmental features
Cost
44
Map 16: Meki Town Proposed Transportation Map
The development of an urban area can be influenced by the condition and existence of road network.
Basically, all areas of the town are not provided with adequate and reliable road network facilities as
necessary to satisfy the demand. The existing road network amenities are not enough to satisfy the
need of the residents and unable to bring necessary development in its present situation. This section
of the report deals with existing situation analysis of road network of Meki town. The analysis deals
with links, hierarchy, pattern, construction materials and junctions are presented below
45
Most of the land use categories are within the standard except the road and transport, manufacturing
& environment. Road and transport land use is below the standard due to the fact that the local roads
within the planning boundary should have been included to fulfill the standard on one hand, and the
topographic settings of the town does not allow for the provision of road infrastructure based on their
requirement on the other hand. Hence, the proposed general land use of the city is summarized by the
following tables and maps by considering 10% the potential land use is reserved for the unforeseen
situations that will probably be happened in the planning period.
General Land Use Classification and Proportions of the Structure Plan According to the Revised
Standards for Structure Plan Preparation and Implementation, the urban land use classification that
can be used during the preparation of the structure plan of any town incorporates 7 major land uses.
They are:
1) Housing / Residence
2) Business and commerce/ Centers and market places,
3) Social Services (Public facilities, cultural, archeological sites and special functions,
4) Green, recreation, sports and environmental sensitive area
5) Administration
6) Manufacturing and storage,
7) Infrastructure, utilities and Transportation,
46
Map 17: Meki Town Proposed General Land Use Map
Computed from the proposed land use of the town
47
6 Recreational and RE 3,581,249 339.29 10.33
Environmental
7 Service S 2,020,693.32 202.07 6.16
8 Transportation T 5,415,423 541.544 16.5
9 Urban Agriculture UA 3,456,955.64 345. 69 10.53
32,827,909.96 3282.09 100.00
CHAPTER FIVE
Plan approval
Preparation of regulations, directives, and working procedures,
Entering agreement with implementing agencies,
Formulation of projects according to LDPs and operational plans,
Allocation of budget, manpower, and equipment,
Valuate, negotiate, fix and compensate landholders, relocate, rehabilitate,
Site clearing, surveying and localizing bench marks and corner stones
Construct necessary infrastructure
Allocate land and issue title deeds for potential developers (individual applicants,
investors or public bodies),
Issue building permit
Register the allocated land on cadastral map,
Monitor and evaluate building development,
Update SP as required when modifications are made to local areas
48
The Implementation Strategies provides a road map for action. It outlines what the town of Meki
must do to implement the newly proposed Structure Plan. It provides an approach especially
customized to the unique Ambo context.
It sets out the potential projects, programs, policies and strategies to move the structure Plan towards
realization. With an emphasis on Governance, the planning and regulatory framework, incentives and
financial tools, capital improvements, as well as other recommended strategies, this part addresses the
current conditions of town in defining the necessary actions that will advance the long-term vision.
Before the commencement of the implementation, Meki town should prepare the required
institutional setup for plan implementation. For implementing bodies, establishment of proper
technical information communication, and setting up of a suitable channel for following
implementation activities to planning bodies and other stakeholders at different level is essential so as
to have a clear vision of implementation tools and phasing guidelines so as to bring about sustainable
urban development in line with the objectives of the plan. Plans should have supportive
implementation tools and phasing guidelines.
49
Revenue collection
Support services
Using the structure plan as a master record system (database) upload each and every implemented
activity on to the structure plan is very important in order to know the implemented portions of the
proposed structure plan. In doing so, at the end of the planning period it is possible to have a database
of the town structure plan showing the reality of the town development.
One thing to remember is that the updating work is not only limited to the implemented ones but also
includes all tools so far prepared for implementing the structure plan like the local development plans
(LDPs) and different projects. This database can be used for further studies as well as used as the
inputs for the next steps of the revision of the city structure plan.
Approval
The prepared city structure plan must have approval from the concerned body before the
commencement of its implementation. Unless approved and legally backed, trying to implement it is
unlawful.
50
Development of Implementation Tools
Implementation tools must be developed by the institution set by plan implementation before starting
implementation. Such tools include rules and regulations regarding space and service standards,
typologies of layouts and buildings; building bylaws, requirements from applicants for plan approval,
regulations providing power and stating functions of institutes. Rules and regulations should be
relevant to the context of urban centers.
Implementation can proceed with the preparation of specific projects and programs. In the programs,
project priorities should be set; however, there should be flexibility to adjust priorities. Within the
overall program of actions, projects should be planned on a yearly basis with budgets for the fiscal
year.
Good Governance
Implementation of urban plans should be based on good governance. To this effect the implementing
body must ensure the following situations:
Transparency: The public should be notified of any planning and implementation activity in
their town.
Consistency: decisions should be consistent for all similar cases.
Accountability: The implementing bodies should be held accountable for their decisions.
Public participation: The public should be consulted during each project preparation.
Referral system: Mechanisms should be laid to allow inconvenienced parties to appeal against
decision.
Clear vision of implementation
The implementing body should have a clear vision of implementation. Having a clear vision implies,
focusing on potentials and exploiting opportunities. Councils and urban managers (local urban
government) are expected to have clear vision for the urban area and constantly inform the public so
as to achieve their visions by implementing plans.
Performance Measures
51
It is difficult to know whether the objectives of an urban plan are being achieved or not through the
implementation of complex activities. There is a need to have objective performance criteria to
evaluate plan implementation. The evaluation has to be project-wise as well as across activities.
Therefore, setting performance measures for each activity that are going to be implemented is the pre-
requisite for commencing implementation of the plan.
Timely Revision
Plans have validity periods; they need to be revised in time. Revisions may not be done all at once;
some amendments should be carried out on yearly basis for planning element. These amendments
could be initiated by individuals or by the planning departments. Amendments should be discussed by
the public and adopted by the ruling council. The overall revision task is similar to starting the
planning process again. Hence it should follow proper procedures of initiation and approval. The
appropriate time for revision is when requests for dispensation and waiver become frequent, or when
the planning department identifies that the existing plan is no more suitable for the situation.
52
1. Major Contents of Land use Categories and Prohibited uses
53
Services (Public
Community facilities
facilities, cultural,
archeological sites and Municipal services
special functions)
Green, recreation, • Open space for outdoor recreation; necessary for the All activities except for direct uses designated
sports and preservation of natural resources; and part of the environment project; any urban
environmental • Open space for the managed production of resources; built-up activity
sensitive areas • Open space reserved for public safety against risks from more than 25 % coverage in parks and green
environmental elements; recreation areas
• Open space for future expansion; Right-of-ways reserves for
future upgrading of road size
Administration • Governmental institutions Mainly not far from central areas except in the
• NGOs case of correctional institution
• Police
• Justice
Manufacturing • Industry and manufacturing All except services defined
• Correctional Institutions
and • Warehouse, depots within the same category
storage
54
3. Standard of Markets for Commercial and Trade Activities
Table 5: standard for size determination land use
1 Gulit / Local 0.25ha 0.5-1 km For local population Open markets Inside local / residential areas
Market close to 5,000 in a Near intersection of residential
city with population roads
size > 50,000
2 Open Market 0.25- 0.5-1 > 2,000 G+0 of semi- In central part of City
0.5ha covered and Near intersection of residential
open markets. roads
55
4 Level two or 2.5-7 G+1-G+3 In or around centers and sub-
buildings, center
Secondary market
Mini super Along major roads and near
4-6hac - markets mass transport system;
1 Local < 500 < 1000 < 20 2830 290 1040 0.42
56
3 Secondar 1500- 2500- 50-60 7950-10240 815-1050 2922-3763 1.17- 1.51
y 2000 3000
57
4 Post- 2.5-6ha 3-5 km Near mass transport system within a walking distance
secondary from transport services (for post-secondary schools)
Education or 100m far from main road, market areas, bars, traffic
congestion, dumping ground and bad smell emitting
Specialized
industries, noise of industrial activities and music shops,
High Schools
health facilities, bus terminals, rivers, gullies, video
shops,
Not close to hazard-prone lands, flooding, malaria, etc
Should be attractive and convenient
Sport fields, parking area, potable water, pedestrian
walk way, plot for garden vegetables, ought to be
available
58
R 2,000 – 5,000 smoke, dust or foul odors,
m2 Shall not be located adjacent to railroads, freight yards, airports,
A Health 15,000-
grinding mill, traffic pools, industrial plants and disposal plants.
Center 25,000
L 200-500 meters far from bars& night clubs, schools, commercial
5,000 – market centers, religious facilities, children's playgrounds
10,000 m2 Health institutions stationed in the premises of airports or industrial
Primary 60,000-
plants shall have 200-500 meters distance
Hospitals 100,000
1,500 meters far from a gas depot or cross-country petroleum or gas
U** 5,000 – 40,000 pipelines.
2
10,000 m The locations of a hospital shall comply with all relevant national and
R Primary
Hospitals state level regulations.
B
The hospital shall be built in a flat terrain with a gentle slope;
General 1,000,000-
A The foundation schemes, soil test and investigation shall be done and
Hospital 1,500,000
59
N Specialized 30, 000 m2 3,500,000 – it shall comply with the national building code;
Hospital 5,000,000 The hospital shall be located along collector roads within walking
distance from mass transport, a need to have water supply, electric
City, public phones, etc;
The building shall be parallel to the wind direction, sun glare and
heat;
The surroundings of the hospital shall be free from dangers of
flooding, pollution of any kind (example air, water, noise) and health
hazards;
From landscape point of view, it should be attractive i.e. with green
areas and beautiful trees.
Table 8: Standards and Norms for Football Fields
1 Play lot 0.1-0.2ha 120m radius 1,250-1,750 Center of catchment area with in residential areas at
neighborhood level
(Residential
cluster) Not adjacent to collector roads
2 Playground 0.3-0.42 ha 400m radius 5,000-7,500 Within the catchment area in residential areas at
60
(Residential) neighborhood level
Kebele level 8064 m2 1km radius 5,000 - 10,000 Within catchment area kebele boundary
football field Outside centers of urban centers
3
7 National level National and It can be located outside the urban boundary
football international
40,000 m2 --
61
1 0.1 - 0.5ha Kebele administration 2,000-10,000 Preferably In the center of Kebele
Accessible (Along the collector roads)
Far from commercially active areas.
2 1 - 2.5ha Woreda administration 60,000-120,000 In all direction
Accessible (Along the collector roads)
Far from commercially active areas.
2 - 2.5ha Zone administration In all direction
Accessible (Along the collector roads)
Far from commercially active areas.
3 2.5 – 2.8 ha Sub-City administration 300,000-600,000 Preferably In the center of sub-City
Accessible (near mass transport services)
Far from commercially active areas.
1 Small scale industries Wood and metal workshops, garage, 500-2,500 Can be mixed with residence and
mills, handicrafts such as ceramic, other compatible uses
traditional clothing and jewelry
62
production, etc
2 Medium scale Processing plants, packing, etc 5,000-10,000 Can be mixed with store,
industries distribution services and other
compatible uses
3 Large scale industries Flour, and textile factories, etc 10,000-15,000 Can be mixed with store,
distribution services and other
compatible uses
63
In the peripheries
Near the junctions of arterials or radial and ring roads
3 Large size Such as silos AMC, EDDC
In close proximity with medium and large industrial
activities
64