FEAI1 Task-Based Approach
FEAI1 Task-Based Approach
James Bourke
Professor Jack. C. Richards
TBT uses a curriculum built around tasks or activities, and from them
language takes place.
Kinds of tasks:
(1) Classroom tasks Activities designed to simulate real-life tasks within a classroom
setting. They are used simply to create the context for communication
(e.g. information gap tasks, role-playing a conversation in a restaurant, etc);
(2) Real-world tasks Activities that students might encounter in their daily lives outside the
classroom (they will use the language in those situations )
(e.g. interviews, checking into a hotel).
Use:
Tasks can be used to
(1) assess what students are able to do;
(2) set priorities for teaching, and
(3) build language awareness around students’ performance on tasks
Use:
Tasks can be used to
James M. Bourke
(Designing a topic-based
syllabus for young
learners, p. 284)
David Nunan
TBT has strengthened the following principles and practices:
Content to be taught
✓ A needs-based approach to content selection. and learned depends on
what students need
✓ An emphasis on learning to communicate through
interaction in the target language.
Through
communicative tasks
✓ The introduction of authentic texts into the learning situation. and enabling tasks
❖ Long (1985)
Real-world
“Target tasks” → Tasks are non-technical and non-linguistic -what Tasks (Richards)
people in the street do and what they would answer when asked about
what they were doing-. Tasks may not have a linguistic outcome. Tasks
may be part of a larger sequence of tasks.
Classroom
❖ Richards, et al. (1986) | Willis (1996) | Skehan (1998) | Ellis (2003)
Tasks
(Richards)
“Pedagogical tasks” → What the learners do in class rather than in
the world outside the classroom, but there's a relationship to
comparable real-world activities: Meaning is primary – The goal is to
achieve a (linguistic or non-linguistic) outcome
David Nunan | Defining ‘Task’ Classroom Tasks
(Richards)
❖ Richards, et al. (1986) | Willis (1996) | Skehan (1998) | Ellis (2003) Pedagogical Tasks
(Nunan)
✓ Taks may or may not involve the production of language (Richards et al) In a realistic way that is based
✓ The TL is used by the learner for a communicative purpose (goal) in order on practical rather than
to achieve an outcome (Willis, 1996) theoretical considerations.
✓ Taks requires learners to process language pragmatically in order to
achieve an outcome that can be evaluated in terms of whether the correct
or appropriate propositional content has been conveyed (Ellis, 2003)
David Nunan
Defining ‘Task’
❖ Nunan (2004)
Pedagogical tasks involve communicative language use in which the user’s attention is
focused on meaning rather than grammatical form.
Find out more about ‘information gap activities’ here and here
❖ Task vs Exercise
TASK EXERCISE
involve using a
whole lot of
language in
different ways
❖ Task-based teaching (TBT) vs Task-supported teaching (TST)
❖ Incidental language acquisition vs Intentional language acquisition
❖ Limitations of TST
Optional, but highly recommended…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=q2eVuAgdKrM
❖ Advantages of TBT
…………….
……………. …………….
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDus5H5USmc
Further videos
(Recommended)
GO BACK
All definitions of pedagogical tasks emphasise that:
Pedagogical tasks involve communicative language use in which the user’s attention is
focused on meaning rather than grammatical form.
…………….
……………. …………….
GO BACK