Volume 9, Issue 9, September – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology

ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP585

The Economic Consequences of Misinformation: An

Analysis of the Impact of Fake News on Stock Market
Volatility During the Covid-19 Pandemic
Oluwasegun Olakoyenikan
New York University
The Arthur L. Carter Journalism Institute

Abstract:- This paper examines the economic stock market volatility during the COVID-19 pandemic,
consequences of misinformation on stock market volatility examining how fake news shaped investor behaviour and
during the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting how false market stability.
information significantly disrupted financial markets. The
analysis explores specific high-profile cases where Information plays a crucial role in financial markets,
misinformation about vaccines, lockdowns, and treatments where investor sentiment and market movements are highly
led to increased market volatility, panic selling, and shifts responsive to news and data (Baker & Wurgler, 2007; Tetlock,
in investor behaviour. The study delves into the effects on 2007). Historically, misinformation has periodically
major indices such as the S&P 500 and Dow Jones, influenced markets, but the COVID-19 pandemic presented
revealing the substantial financial losses experienced by unique conditions that intensified these effects (Créon et al.,
retail and institutional investors. It also discusses the 2021; Hossain et al., 2023). High levels of uncertainty,
regulatory and institutional responses from financial combined with the constant flow of unverified information,
authorities and social media platforms, as well as the led to pronounced market reactions that were not always
challenges they face in curbing misinformation’s rapid rational. This paper builds on existing literature to explore the
spread. The paper concludes with recommendations for specific ways in which misinformation during the pandemic
enhancing market resilience, emphasising the importance affected market dynamics, focusing on its impact on key
of media literacy, robust fact-checking, and proactive indices, investor confidence, and overall market stability
regulatory frameworks to mitigate the impact of (Chowdhury, et al., 2022).
misinformation in future crises. This study underscores the
ongoing need for vigilant market practices and improved The surge of misinformation during the pandemic
information governance to maintain economic stability. highlights the need for a critical assessment of its economic
impact on stock markets (Yarovaya et al., 22022). Therefore,
Keywords:- COVID-19, Economic Stability; Fact-Checking; by examining specific instances where fake news directly
Financial Markets; Misinformation; Volatility. influenced market performance, this analysis seeks to quantify
the financial losses and gains resulting from these distortions.
I. INTRODUCTION Additionally, the study explores the responses from regulatory
bodies, media platforms, and investors to mitigate the effects
The COVID-19 pandemic not only caused unprecedented of misinformation. Ultimately, this paper argues that the
health crises worldwide but also unleashed a wave of spread of misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic not
misinformation that significantly disrupted various sectors, only amplified stock market volatility but also underscored the
including financial markets (Apuke & Omar, 2021; Cheng et importance of robust regulatory frameworks and investor
al., 2024; Talabi et al., 2022). During the pandemic, the rapid education to safeguard market integrity in future crises.
dissemination of fake news across social media and other
platforms exacerbated market uncertainties, influencing II. LITERATURE REVIEW
investor decisions and contributing to heightened volatility
(Amodu & Otesile, 2023; Dash & Maitra, 2022; Shair et al., Information is a crucial driver of financial market
2023). Misinformation, ranging from false reports about dynamics, shaping the decisions of investors, influencing
vaccine efficacy to misleading claims on government policies, stock prices, and determining overall market behaviour
created an environment where stock prices often moved (Petratos, 2021). Accurate information allows investors to
erratically, detached from fundamental economic indicators make informed decisions based on the fundamentals of
(Greene & Murphy, 2021; Patwa et al., 2021). This paper aims companies, macroeconomic indicators, and geopolitical
to analyse the economic consequences of misinformation on developments (Malmgren, 2015). Conversely, misinformation

IJISRT24SEP585 www.ijisrt.com 667

Volume 9, Issue 9, September – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP585

—whether through fake news, rumours, or speculative The COVID-19 pandemic presented a unique context
reports—can distort these decisions, leading to market that made financial markets especially susceptible to
inefficiencies and volatility (Brody, 2022; Webb & Webb, misinformation (Del Rio & Malani, 2020; Seale et al., 2020).
2013). According to efficient market hypothesis (EMH) The pandemic created unprecedented levels of uncertainty,
theories, financial markets are assumed to reflect all available with rapidly changing information regarding health guidelines,
information, meaning that prices adjust rapidly to new data government interventions, and economic forecasts. In this
((Alajbeg, Bubaš, & Šonje, 2012; Clark et al., 2001; Naseer & environment, misinformation proliferated, driven by the
Bin Tariq, 2015). However, when the information being widespread use of social media platforms and the high demand
disseminated is false or misleading, it creates market for real-time information (Seale et al., 2020). The speed and
distortions, resulting in irrational trading behaviour and price volume of fake news during the pandemic exceeded previous
swings that deviate from the underlying economic reality. crises, contributing to unpredictable market movements. For
Therefore, the role of information, whether accurate or instance, false reports about vaccine approvals, exaggerated
otherwise, is not just a backdrop to financial markets but a claims about the severity of lockdowns, and misleading
core component that actively shapes market outcomes information about economic recovery timelines all played
(Blankespoor, 2020). roles in shaping investor sentiment and market behaviour
(Amodu et al., 2024; Mercola & Cummins, 2021; Skaffle et
The impact of misinformation on market dynamics can al., 2022). These false narratives often led to overreactions in
be particularly pronounced because of the ways in which it the stock market, with indices experiencing sharp swings in
alters investor perceptions and decision-making processes response to misleading information (Skaffle et al., 2022).
(Blankespoor, 2020). Investor sentiment, often driven by
headlines and narratives, plays a significant role in price Furthermore, the pandemic highlighted the challenge of
movements, especially during times of uncertainty. distinguishing credible information from misinformation,
Misinformation can amplify emotions such as fear and greed, especially when even authoritative sources were occasionally
leading to herd behaviour, where investors collectively react to inconsistent in their messaging due to the rapidly evolving
false information without verifying its credibility nature of the crisis. The lack of clear, consistent
(Vasconcellos-Silva & Castiel, 2022). This can result in abrupt communication from both governments and health authorities
sell-offs or rallies that are disconnected from market created an information vacuum that was often filled by fake
fundamentals. Empirical research suggests that during periods news. Investors, in their quest to interpret the unfolding
of heightened uncertainty, such as financial crises or events, frequently relied on social media and unverified
geopolitical tensions, misinformation tends to have a more sources, making them more vulnerable to misinformation.
pronounced effect, triggering excessive volatility. This This was compounded by algorithm-driven platforms that
phenomenon underscores the importance of reliable prioritize sensational or engaging content, irrespective of its
information dissemination and highlights the potential accuracy, thereby amplifying the reach and impact of fake
consequences when fake news proliferates unchecked. news on financial markets. As a result, misinformation became
a significant risk factor, influencing not just individual stock
The historical impact of misinformation on financial prices but also broader market indices and sectors.
markets provides valuable insights into the consequences of
false information. One prominent example is the case of the The economic consequences of misinformation during
“flash crash” of May 6, 2010, where a brief yet severe stock the COVID-19 pandemic underscore the need for robust
market crash was partially attributed to algorithmic trading measures to mitigate its impact on financial markets.
responding to misinformation (Vuorenmaa & Wang, 2014). Regulatory bodies, such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Although this event was complex and involved multiple Commission (SEC), have recognized the risks posed by
factors, the dissemination of inaccurate data amplified market misinformation and have taken steps to address it through
reactions, causing a sudden plunge in major indices (Gasparin increased monitoring and enforcement actions against those
& Schinckus, 2022). Another notable instance occurred in who intentionally spread false information for market
2013, when the Associated Press’s Twitter account was manipulation. Additionally, financial news platforms and
hacked, and a false tweet about explosions at the White House social media companies have been urged to implement stricter
caused the stock market to lose $136 billion within minutes fact-checking protocols and to develop technologies that can
before recovering (BBC, 2013; Dice, 2017; Selyukh, 2013). identify and curb the spread of fake news. These efforts, while
These examples illustrate that misinformation can have necessary, highlight the ongoing challenges in combating
immediate and severe impacts on market stability, misinformation, as the rapid pace of information
emphasizing the vulnerability of financial systems to false dissemination often outstrips the ability of regulators and
information, particularly in an era of high-frequency trading platforms to control it. This points to a broader need for
and automated decision-making processes (Dice, 2017). enhanced media literacy among investors and the general
public to critically evaluate the information they consume.

IJISRT24SEP585 www.ijisrt.com 668

Volume 9, Issue 9, September – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP585

III. THE NIGERIAN EXAMPLE have acknowledged the risks posed by misinformation
(Mohammed, 2023; Nwachukwu, 2013). However, regulatory
The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the difficulty of responses remain insufficient due to limited resources and the
distinguishing credible information from misinformation, rapid pace at which fake news spreads. Although the SEC has
particularly in the Nigerian context, where misinformation taken steps to enhance market surveillance and enforce
significantly influenced the stock market (Balakrishnan et al., penalties for market manipulation, the challenge persists as
2023). The rapid spread of the virus led to a flurry of false information often circulates faster than regulatory
conflicting information, with even authoritative sources interventions can be implemented (Nwafor & Emecheta,
occasionally providing inconsistent messaging due to the 2022).
evolving nature of the crisis (Amodu et al., 2024; Talabi et al.,
2022). In Nigeria, the absence of clear and consistent Efforts by Nigerian financial news platforms and social
communication from the government and health authorities, media companies to implement stricter fact-checking
such as the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control (NCDC), protocols have also faced challenges (Okon et al., 2021).
created a fertile ground for misinformation (Aduloju, 2021; While some initiatives, such as collaboration with fact-
Inobemhe, 2021). The information vacuum was frequently checking organisations like Dubawa and Africa Check, have
filled by unverified news shared on social media platforms sought to curb the spread of misinformation, these measures
like WhatsApp, Twitter, and Facebook, where sensational are often reactive rather than proactive (Wang et al., 2019).
content often overshadowed factual reporting. This The inability to keep pace with the speed of misinformation
environment made investors increasingly reliant on dubious dissemination underscores the need for more robust
sources, exposing them to misinformation that distorted approaches, including enhancing digital literacy among
market perceptions and decisions (Bala et al., 2021). investors to critically assess the information they encounter.
Developing technologies that can pre-emptively flag and limit
The Nigerian stock market, characterised by its volatility the spread of false financial news could further safeguard the
and susceptibility to external shocks, was particularly market (Adekunle, 2021). In essence, the Nigerian case
vulnerable during the pandemic (Abdullahi, 2019; Fasanya & underscores a broader challenge in managing misinformation's
Akinde, 2019). Investors’ behaviour was heavily influenced by impact on financial markets. Enhancing media literacy and
fake news, including exaggerated reports of lockdown investor education, alongside regulatory reforms and
extensions, falsified economic forecasts, and rumours about technological solutions, is crucial to mitigating the risks posed
company closures. These factors triggered panic selling and by misinformation in Nigeria’s stock market and ensuring
buying, destabilising the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) and more stable and informed market conditions during crises (Wu
leading to significant fluctuations in market indices et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2022).
(Olanrewaju & Afolabi, 2021). Notably, misinformation about
the oil sector—a critical component of Nigeria’s economy— IV. CASE STUDIES OF MISINFORMATION
further aggravated market instability. False reports about oil IMPACT
price recoveries and inaccurate projections about production
cuts led to erratic trading, significantly impacting oil-related Misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic took
stocks (Oladele et al., 2021). many forms, from exaggerated claims about vaccine efficacy
to false reports of government lockdowns and miracle cures
In addition, algorithm-driven social media platforms (Khuroo, 2020). One notable instance involved the spread of
contributed to the amplification of misinformation. These misinformation regarding hydroxychloroquine as a supposed
platforms prioritise sensational or engaging content regardless cure for COVID-19, which led to sharp price fluctuations in
of its accuracy, which frequently resulted in the widespread pharmaceutical stocks (Khuroo, 2020). Despite the lack of
dissemination of market-related fake news (Vinerean, 2017). scientific evidence supporting its effectiveness, prominent
For instance, misinformation about pharmaceutical figures and widespread social media dissemination amplified
companies’ involvement in COVID-19 vaccine production led the narrative, driving up stock prices of companies involved in
to speculative trading in Nigerian pharmaceutical stocks, its production. Similarly, misinformation about imminent
demonstrating the tangible impact of fake news on market lockdowns often led to panic buying and sudden market dips,
dynamics (Adebayo, 2021). The compounded effect of as investors reacted to unverified claims that significantly
misinformation was evident in the broader indices and sectoral influenced short-term trading behaviour (Naeem, 2021). These
performances of the NSE, which experienced unprecedented examples underscore how misinformation can destabilise
volatility during the peak of the pandemic. markets by prompting decisions based not on economic
fundamentals but on false narratives (Segara, 2022).
The economic consequences of misinformation in
Nigeria during COVID-19 highlight the urgent need for The effects of misinformation were particularly evident
measures to mitigate its impact on financial markets in major stock indices such as the S&P 500, Dow Jones, and
(Anastasia et al., 2022). Nigerian regulatory bodies, including various global markets, which experienced significant
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of Nigeria, volatility during the pandemic (Acuri et al., 2023; Jabeen et

IJISRT24SEP585 www.ijisrt.com 669

Volume 9, Issue 9, September – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP585

al., 2022). For example, false reports about vaccine V. ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES OF
developments often led to sharp intraday swings in these MISINFORMATION
indices, reflecting the market’s sensitivity to any news
perceived as indicative of future economic recovery. On The proliferation of misinformation during the COVID-
multiple occasions, erroneous news about vaccine approvals 19 pandemic significantly increased market volatility, with
or setbacks caused sharp reversals in market sentiment, day-to-day price swings becoming more pronounced
leading to dramatic price movements within short timeframes. (Puaschunder, 2020). Stock indices and individual securities
In some instances, this volatility was further exacerbated by alike experienced heightened fluctuations as investors reacted
algorithmic trading systems that responded automatically to to false news reports. For instance, misinformation about
keywords in news reports, amplifying price swings. This government stimulus measures frequently caused abrupt
phenomenon highlights how misinformation can create movements in the stock and bond markets, as traders adjusted
feedback loops in financial markets, where initial false reports their positions based on incorrect assumptions about fiscal
trigger further volatility as automated systems and investors policy directions. This heightened volatility not only rendered
alike react without verification (Kusumahadi & Permana, markets unpredictable, but it also presented considerable
2021). hazards to retail and institutional investors. Frequent and
abrupt price swings can result in significant financial losses
Investor behaviour during the pandemic was heavily for those caught up in transactions, especially when decisions
influenced by misinformation, often manifesting in panic are based on misleading information rather than good analysis
selling, herd behaviour, and increased trading volumes (Clarke et al., 2020). Increased volatility also confounded
(Kiruba & Vasantha, 2021). Panic selling occurred when market forecasting and risk management measures, making it
investors, driven by fear sparked by fake news, rushed to difficult for investors to make long-term decisions in a
offload assets, leading to sharp declines in stock prices. For misinformation-rich environment.
instance, early in the pandemic, misinformation regarding the
severity and duration of lockdowns triggered massive sell-offs Investor confidence was severely affected by the spread
in sectors perceived as vulnerable, such as travel, hospitality, of misinformation, undermining trust in financial news and the
and retail (Mazur et al., 2021). Herd behaviour, where broader market environment. Confidence is a critical factor in
investors collectively follow the actions of others, was also financial markets, as it influences investment decisions,
evident as social media amplified fake news, causing investors market stability, and overall economic health. During the
to mimic panic-driven market moves without fully pandemic, the constant barrage of fake news led many
understanding the underlying factors. This behaviour often investors to question the reliability of information sources,
resulted in irrational market outcomes, such as the resulting in a more cautious and risk-averse market posture
overvaluation or undervaluation of assets, which could persist (Acuri et al., 2023). For instance, false reports about the
until corrective measures, like official clarifications or fact- effectiveness of government responses to the pandemic or
checking interventions, stabilised market perceptions (Dhall & exaggerated claims about economic recovery prospects made
Singh, 2020). investors wary of committing capital, contributing to reduced
liquidity and increased market fragility (Dhall & Singh, 2020).
Misinformation-driven volatility also led to increased This erosion of trust was not confined to retail investors;
trading volumes, as investors attempted to capitalise on institutional investors also faced challenges in discerning
perceived opportunities or to hedge against anticipated risks credible information, affecting their ability to make informed
driven by false information (Clarke et al., 2020). Day traders, strategic decisions. As a result, misinformation acted as a
in particular, were active during periods of misinformation- barrier to market stability, prolonging periods of uncertainty
induced volatility, seeking to profit from rapid price changes. and delaying recovery (Talwar et al., 2021).
However, this behaviour often contributed to further
instability, as increased trading volume can amplify market The financial losses and gains associated with
swings, making it challenging for prices to find equilibrium. misinformation during the pandemic were significant,
Additionally, the rise of retail investors during the pandemic, impacting both retail and institutional investors (Cookson et
many of whom relied on social media and other non- al., 2020). For many retail investors, the reliance on
traditional sources of information, added another layer of misinformation led to substantial losses, as panic-driven
vulnerability to the markets (Talwar et al., 2021). These decisions often resulted in selling at the bottom or buying into
investors, often less experienced and more susceptible to market rallies driven by false optimism. For example, the
misinformation, played a significant role in driving volatility, surge in misinformation about certain "miracle" stocks or
as their collective actions, whether buying or selling, had sectors during the pandemic saw many investors pouring
noticeable effects on stock prices and overall market trends money into companies that were later revealed to have little to
(Clarke et al., 2020). no substance behind their supposed market potential, leading
to sharp declines in value once the truth was revealed.
Conversely, some investors, particularly those with access to
more sophisticated analysis tools, were able to exploit

IJISRT24SEP585 www.ijisrt.com 670

Volume 9, Issue 9, September – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP585

misinformation for profit, short-selling stocks that were driven 2024). These included increased scrutiny of market
up by false news or buying into sectors they anticipated would communications, enforcement actions against entities
be buoyed by market corrections. This divergence in outcomes spreading misinformation, and the issuance of guidance to
highlights the uneven impact of misinformation, where those market participants on the importance of relying on verified
with better information and analytical capabilities often fare information. Regulators also explored technological solutions,
better than those more exposed to misinformation. such as deploying artificial intelligence (AI) tools to monitor
and identify patterns of misinformation across digital
The long-term impacts of misinformation on market platforms, enhancing their capacity to respond swiftly to
regulation, trust in financial news, and the need for fact- emerging threats (Kertysova, 2018).
checking mechanisms are profound. Regulatory bodies, such
as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the Media and social media platforms played a crucial role in
United States and similar institutions globally, have the dissemination of misinformation, but they also took steps
increasingly recognised the threat posed by misinformation to to address the problem (Shu, Sliva, Wang, Tang, & Liu, 2017).
market integrity (Chen, 2022). In response, there has been a Platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Google introduced
push towards stricter regulations around market manipulation, policies to label, flag, or remove content that was identified as
including the spread of false information. Efforts to enhance misleading, particularly in the context of financial
transparency and accountability among financial news information. Twitter, for instance, implemented measures to
platforms and social media companies have also gained label tweets with misinformation tags or reduce their visibility
traction, with calls for improved monitoring and fact-checking to curb the spread of false narratives (Apuke & Omar, 2021).
processes (Chen, 2022). However, these efforts face Similarly, Facebook partnered with third-party fact-checkers
significant challenges, as the rapid dissemination of to review content and reduce the distribution of posts flagged
misinformation often outpaces regulatory responses. The long- as false. However, these efforts were often inconsistent and
term consequence is an increased burden on market reactive, highlighting the complexities involved in balancing
participants to critically evaluate information sources and for the need to curb misinformation while respecting free speech
regulators to develop more agile frameworks that can respond and jurisdictional differences across countries (Rocha et al.,
swiftly to misinformation crises. 2021).

Trust in financial news and information sources has been Regulating misinformation remains a significant
significantly damaged, with lasting implications for how challenge due to the rapid speed at which false information
investors interact with markets. The rise of misinformation spreads and the global nature of digital communication
during the pandemic exposed the vulnerabilities in traditional platforms (Apuke & Omar, 2021). One of the primary
and digital news ecosystems, where speed and engagement difficulties is the varied jurisdictional powers of regulators,
often took precedence over accuracy and verification. This which often struggle to enforce actions across borders. Social
shift has led to a growing demand for fact-checked, reliable media platforms operate globally, and misinformation
information, prompting many financial platforms to invest in originating from one region can quickly impact markets
verification processes and to partner with independent fact- elsewhere, complicating enforcement actions by regulators
checking organisations. Nevertheless, rebuilding trust will who lack cross-border authority. Additionally, misinformation
require sustained efforts, including enhancing media literacy can be generated by a wide range of actors, from individuals
among investors, holding platforms accountable for the spread to organised groups, making it difficult for regulators to
of misinformation, and ensuring that credible information is identify and penalise the sources effectively. The fast-evolving
accessible. The pandemic has underscored the critical role of nature of misinformation also means that regulatory responses
information integrity in maintaining market confidence, often lag behind, necessitating more agile and collaborative
making it clear that mitigating misinformation is not just a approaches among governments, platforms, and market
regulatory challenge but also an essential component of participants to effectively combat this threat.
protecting market stability.
VII. LESSONS LEARNED AND FUTURE
VI. REGULATORY AND INSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS
RESPONSES
The spread of misinformation during the pandemic
The economic consequences of misinformation during highlighted critical lessons for investors, underscoring the
the COVID-19 pandemic prompted a range of responses from need for vigilance and caution in navigating information in
governments and financial regulators aimed at mitigating its financial markets (Clarke et al. 2021). Investors are
impact on market stability. Financial regulators, such as the encouraged to diversify their information sources, prioritise
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the data from reputable financial news outlets, and critically
European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), evaluate news before making investment decisions. Strategies
implemented measures to combat the spread of false such as consulting financial advisors, using fact-checking
information that could manipulate market behaviour (Micagni, platforms, and avoiding reactionary trading based on

IJISRT24SEP585 www.ijisrt.com 671

Volume 9, Issue 9, September – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP585

unverified information can help mitigate the risks associated resilience, safeguarding economic stability against the
with misinformation. Additionally, investors should consider persistent risks posed by false information (Shair et al., 2023).
employing risk management techniques, such as setting stop-
loss orders, to protect their investments from sudden market REFERENCES
swings driven by false news.
[1]. Abdullahi, S. I. (2019). Measuring volatility linkage,
Promoting fact-checking and media literacy among the clustering and sensitivity to external shocks in Nigerian
public and investors emerged as vital strategies for countering stock index. International Journal of Financial Services
misinformation. Fact-checking organisations played a crucial Management, 9(4), 345-368.
role during the pandemic by debunking false claims and [2]. Aduloju, E. T. (2021). Media and Information Literacy: A
providing accurate information, thereby helping to stabilise critical response to the challenge of infodemic in the
market perceptions (Naeem & Ozuem, 2022). There is a Covid-19 Pandemic Era in Nigeria. International Journal
growing need to expand these efforts and integrate media of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 5(7), 15-
literacy education into public and investor training programs 24.
(Ricci & Sautter, 2022). Enhancing media literacy equips [3]. Alajbeg, D., Bubaš, Z., & Šonje, V. (2012). The efficient
individuals with the skills to critically assess the credibility of market hypothesis: problems with interpretations of
information, differentiate between reliable and unreliable empirical tests. Financial theory and practice, 36(1), 53-
sources, and resist the impulse to react to sensational 72.
headlines. Such education is essential not only for protecting [4]. Allcott, H., Gentzkow, M., & Yu, C. (2019). Trends in
individual investments but also for maintaining overall market the diffusion of misinformation on social media.
stability in the face of misinformation (Sautter & Ricci, 2023). Research & Politics, 6(2), 2053168019848554.
[5]. Amodu, A. D., & Otesile, A. E. (2023). A multimodal
Looking forward, financial markets and regulators must discourse analysis of visual illustrations related to
prepare for future misinformation crises by developing more COVID-19 awareness in Nigeria. Linguistics and
robust and proactive measures. This includes investing in Literature Review, 9(1), 23-48.
technologies that can detect and flag misinformation in real- [6]. Amodu, A. D., Ochuba, C. O., Badirudeen, I. T., &
time, improving coordination among international regulatory Ikeokwu, K. O. (2024). Vaccine inequalities, hesitancy,
bodies, and fostering greater collaboration with social media and media-focused public health interventions in
platforms to manage the spread of false information more English-speaking West-African Countries. World Journal
effectively (Barnard, 2009). Additionally, markets should of Advanced Research and Reviews, 23(1), 273-283.
consider establishing protocols for temporarily suspending [7]. Anastasia, C. O., Victor, C. E., & Ezekiel, O. (2022).
trading in securities that are significantly affected by Covid-19 crisis and stock market volatility in Nigeria: a
misinformation, allowing time for clarification and reducing garch model approach. International Research Journal of
the impact of panic-driven trading. Therefore, by adopting Management, IT and Social Sciences, 9(3), 317-327.
these strategies, financial markets can enhance their resilience [8]. Apuke, O. D., & Omar, B. (2021). Fake news and
to misinformation and ensure that future crises do not COVID-19: modelling the predictors of fake news
destabilise the global economy as severely as witnessed during sharing among social media users. Telematics and
the COVID-19 pandemic (Friesz, 2015). Informatics, 56, 101475.
[9]. Arcuri, M. C., Gandolfi, G., & Russo, I. (2023). Does
VIII. CONCLUSION fake news impact stock returns? Evidence from US and
EU stock markets. Journal of Economics and Business,
Overall, the case studies of misinformation impact and 125, 106130.
the broader economic consequences highlight the significant [10]. Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2007). Investor sentiment in
challenges posed by fake news to financial markets. From the stock market. Journal of economic perspectives,
driving market volatility and altering investor behaviour to 21(2), 129-151.
eroding confidence and complicating regulatory landscapes, [11]. Balakrishnan, V., Abdul Rahman, L. H., Tan, J. K., &
the effects of misinformation are multifaceted and far-reaching Lee, Y. S. (2023). COVID-19 fake news among the
(Hong et al., 2023; Kar et al., 2023; Naeem & Ozuem, 2022). general population: motives, sociodemographic,
As financial markets become increasingly interconnected and attitude/behavior and impacts–a systematic review.
reliant on real-time information, the need for robust defences Online Information Review, 47(5), 944-973.
against misinformation has never been greater (Kar et al., [12]. Barnard, J. W. (2009). Deception, decisions, and investor
2023). This crisis highlights the urgent need for accurate, education. Elder LJ, 17, 201.
timely information and the role of proactive regulatory [13]. Blankespoor, E., deHaan, E., & Marinovic, I. (2020).
measures, fact-checking, and media literacy in mitigating Disclosure processing costs, investors’ information
misinformation’s impact. Moving forward, a collaborative choice, and equity market outcomes: A review. Journal
effort among regulators, media platforms, and investors is of Accounting and Economics, 70(2-3), 101344.
crucial to improving information accuracy, accountability, and

IJISRT24SEP585 www.ijisrt.com 672

Volume 9, Issue 9, September – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP585

[14]. Brody, D. C. (2022). Noise, fake news, and tenacious during COVID‐19. Business Strategy & Development,
Bayesians. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 797904. 5(4), 350-360.
[15]. Ceron, W., de-Lima-Santos, M. F., & Quiles, M. G. [29]. Inobemhe, K. (2021). Social Media Fake News, Myths
(2021). Fake news agenda in the era of COVID-19: and Conspiracies on COVID-19: Threat to Public Health
Identifying trends through fact-checking content. Online in Nigeria. Media & Communication Currents, 5(1), 38-
social networks and media, 21, 100116. 55.
[16]. Cheng, C., Ying, W., Ebrahimi, O. V., & Wong, K. F. E. [30]. Jabeen, S., Farhan, M., Zaka, M. A., Fiaz, M., & Farasat,
(2024). Coping style and mental health amid the first M. (2022). COVID and world stock markets: A
wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: a culture-moderated comprehensive discussion. Frontiers in psychology, 12,
meta-analysis of 44 nations. Health Psychology Review, 763346.
18(1), 141-164. [31]. Kar, A. K., Tripathi, S. N., Malik, N., Gupta, S., &
[17]. Clarke, J., Chen, H., Du, D., & Hu, Y. J. (2020). Fake Sivarajah, U. (2023). How does misinformation and
news, investor attention, and market reaction. capricious opinions impact the supply chain-A study on
Information Systems Research, 32(1), 35-52. the impacts during the pandemic. Annals of Operations
[18]. Clarke, J., Jandik, T., & Mandelker, G. (2001). The Research, 327(2), 713-734.
efficient markets hypothesis. Expert financial planning: [32]. Kertysova, K. (2018). Artificial intelligence and
Advice from industry leaders, 7(3/4), 126-141. disinformation: How AI changes the way disinformation
[19]. Cookson, J. A., Engelberg, J. E., & Mullins, W. (2020). is produced, disseminated, and can be countered.
Does partisanship shape investor beliefs? Evidence from Security and Human Rights, 29(1-4), 55-81.
the COVID-19 pandemic. The Review of Asset Pricing [33]. Khuroo, M. S. (2020). Chloroquine and
Studies, 10(4), 863-893. hydroxychloroquine in coronavirus disease 2019
[20]. Dash, S. R., & Maitra, D. (2022). The COVID-19 (COVID-19). Facts, fiction and the hype: a critical
pandemic uncertainty, investor sentiment, and global appraisal. International journal of antimicrobial agents,
equity markets: Evidence from the time-frequency co- 56(3), 106101.
movements. The North American Journal of Economics [34]. Kiruba, A. S., & Vasantha, V. (2021). Determinants in
and Finance, 62, 101712. investment behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic.
[21]. Dhall, R., & Singh, B. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic The Indonesian Capital Market Review, 13(2), 1.
and herding behaviour: Evidence from India’s stock [35]. Kusumahadi, T. A., & Permana, F. C. (2021). Impact of
market. Millennial Asia, 11(3), 366-390. COVID-19 on global stock market volatility. Journal of
[22]. Dice, M. (2017). The true story of fake news: How Economic Integration, 36(1), 20-45.
mainstream media manipulates millions. Mark Dice. [36]. Malmgren, P. (2015). Geopolitics for investors. CFA
[23]. Fasanya, I. O., & Akinde, M. A. (2019). Volatility Institute Research Foundation M2015-1.
transmission in the Nigerian financial market. The Webb, R. I., & Webb, A. R. (2013). Shock markets:
Journal of Finance and Data Science, 5(2), 99-115. Trading lessons for volatile times. FT Press.
[24]. Friesz, C. R. (2015). Crowdfunding & investor [37]. Mazur, M., Dang, M., & Vega, M. (2021). COVID-19
education: Empowering investors to mitigate risk & and the march 2020 stock market crash. Evidence from
prevent fraud. Suffolk UL Rev., 48, 131. S&P1500. Finance research letters, 38, 101690.
[25]. Gasparin, M., & Schinckus, C. (2022). The [38]. Mercola, J., & Cummins, R. (2021). The truth about
Performativity of Algorithmic Trading: The COVID-19: Exposing the great reset, lockdowns, vaccine
Epistemology of Flash Crashes. Knowledge Cultures, passports, and the new normal. Chelsea Green
10(1), 104-122. Publishing.
[26]. Greene, C. M., & Murphy, G. (2021). Quantifying the [39]. Mohammed, I. (2023). COVID-19 outbreak and
effects of fake news on behavior: Evidence from a study performance of financial markets: evidence from the
of COVID-19 misinformation. Journal of experimental stock market, the foreign exchange market and
psychology: Applied, 27(4), 773. cryptocurrencies market in Nigeria. International
[27]. Hong, Y., Qu, B., Yang, Z., & Jiang, Y. (2023). The Journal of Business and Emerging Markets, 15(1), 1-33.
contagion of fake news concern and extreme stock [40]. Naeem, M. (2021). Do social media platforms develop
market risks during the COVID-19 period. Finance consumer panic buying during the fear of Covid-19
Research Letters, 58, 104258. pandemic. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,
[28]. Hossain, M. A., Chowdhury, M. M. H., Pappas, I. O., 58, 102226.
Metri, B., Hughes, L., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023). Fake [41]. Naeem, M., & Ozuem, W. (2022). Understanding
news on Facebook and their impact on supply chain misinformation and rumors that generated panic buying
disruption during COVID-19. Annals of Operations as a social practice during COVID-19 pandemic:
Research, 327(2), 683-711. evidence from Twitter, YouTube and focus group
Chowdhury, E. K., Dhar, B. K., & Stasi, A. (2022). interviews. Information Technology & People, 35(7),
Volatility of the US stock market and business strategy 2140-2166.

IJISRT24SEP585 www.ijisrt.com 673

Volume 9, Issue 9, September – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP585

[42]. Naseer, M., & Bin Tariq, D. Y. (2015). The efficient [54]. Skafle, I., Nordahl-Hansen, A., Quintana, D. S., Wynn,
market hypothesis: A critical review of the literature. The R., & Gabarron, E. (2022). Misinformation About
IUP journal of financial risk management, 12(4), 48-63. COVID-19 Vaccines on Social Media: Rapid Review.
[43]. Nwachukwu, O. C. (2013). The role of Securities and Journal of medical Internet research, 24(8), e37367.
Exchange Commission (SEC) in public issue of [55]. Talabi, F. O., Ugbor, I. P., Talabi, M. J., Ugwuoke, J. C.,
securities and the structure of the Nigerian capital Oloyede, D., Aiyesimoju, A. B., & Ikechukwu-
market. Nnamdi Azikiwe University Journal of Ilomuanya, A. B. (2022). Effect of a social media-based
International Law and Jurisprudence, 4, 91-107. counselling intervention in countering fake news on
[44]. Okon, P. E., Musa, J. H. T., & Oyesomi, K. (2021). Fake COVID-19 vaccine in Nigeria. Health Promotion
news circulation and regulation in Anglophone West International, 37(2), daab140.
Africa. Indiana Journal of Humanities and Social [56]. Talwar, S., Talwar, M., Tarjanne, V., & Dhir, A. (2021).
Sciences, 2(7), 35-49. Why retail investors traded equity during the pandemic?
[45]. Patwa, P., Sharma, S., Pykl, S., Guptha, V., Kumari, G., An application of artificial neural networks to examine
Akhtar, M. S., ... & Chakraborty, T. (2021). Fighting an behavioral biases. Psychology & Marketing, 38(11),
infodemic: Covid-19 fake news dataset. In Combating 2142-2163.
Online Hostile Posts in Regional Languages during [57]. Tetlock, P. C. (2007). Giving content to investor
Emergency Situation: First International Workshop, sentiment: The role of media in the stock market. The
CONSTRAINT 2021, Collocated with AAAI 2021, Virtual Journal of finance, 62(3), 1139-1168.
Event, February 8, 2021, Revised Selected Papers 1 (pp. [58]. Vasconcellos-Silva, P. R., & Castiel, L. D. (2022). Fake
21-29). Springer International Publishing. news and the seven sins of capital: a metaphorical
[46]. Petratos, P. N. (2021). Misinformation, disinformation, analysis of vices in the context of the COVID-19
and fake news: Cyber risks to business. Business pandemic. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 38, e00195421.
Horizons, 64(6), 763-774. [59]. Vuorenmaa, T. A., & Wang, L. (2014). An agent-based
[47]. Puaschunder, J. M. (2020, December). Heterodox model of the flash crash of May 6, 2010, with policy
Economic Cycles Theory during the COVID-19 implications. Available at SSRN 2336772.
economic crisis: Social volatility, affect and the finance [60]. Wang, Y., McKee, M., Torbica, A., & Stuckler, D.
market-real economy gap. In Proceedings of the 20th (2019). Systematic literature review on the spread of
International Research Association for Interdisciplinary health-related misinformation on social media. Social
Studies (RAIS) Conference on Social Sciences and science & medicine, 240, 112552.
Humanities (pp. 108-118). [61]. Wu, X., Wang, X., Ma, S., & Ye, Q. (2017). The
[48]. Ricci, S. A. G., & Sautter, C. M. (2022). The Educated influence of social media on stock volatility. Frontiers of
Retail Investor: A Response to" Regulating Democratized Engineering Management, 4(2), 201-211.
Investing". Ohio St. LJ Online, 83, 205. [62]. Zhang, H., Chen, Y., Rong, W., Wang, J., & Tan, J.
[49]. Rocha, Y. M., De Moura, G. A., Desidério, G. A., De (2022). Effect of social media rumors on stock market
Oliveira, C. H., Lourenço, F. D., & de Figueiredo volatility: A case of data mining in China. Frontiers in
Nicolete, L. D. (2021). The impact of fake news on Physics, 10, 987799.
social media and its influence on health during the
COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Journal of
Public Health, 1-10.
[50]. Seale, H., Heywood, A. E., Leask, J., Sheel, M., Thomas,
S., Durrheim, D. N., ... & Kaur, R. (2020). COVID-19 is
rapidly changing: Examining public perceptions and
behaviors in response to this evolving pandemic. PloS
one, 15(6), e0235112.
[51]. Segera, A. (2022). An Investigation Into Stock Market
Reaction to Covid-19 Pandemic: a Case of Shares Listed
at the Nairobi Securities Exchange (Doctoral
dissertation, University of Nairobi).
[52]. Shair, W., Rasul, F., Raza, S., & Qamar, A. (2023). Panic
News and media Hype Effects on Stock Market Returns
and Volatility amid Infectious Diseases Turmoil. Bulletin
of Business and Economics (BBE), 12(4), 79-87.
[53]. Shair, W., Rasul, F., Raza, S., & Qamar, A. (2023). Panic
News and media Hype Effects on Stock Market Returns
and Volatility amid Infectious Diseases Turmoil. Bulletin
of Business and Economics (BBE), 12(4), 79-87.

IJISRT24SEP585 www.ijisrt.com 674