IUBAV - Lecture 5 - Module 1 Introduction of Valuation Models S2 2023 2024
IUBAV - Lecture 5 - Module 1 Introduction of Valuation Models S2 2023 2024
PE multiple
Arg industry Industry PIB PEmultiple 130Kx
15%
PE Sector
Stir out
let
E
PB multiple 118Kx 15%
- - NOTK
VALUATION METHODS
Discounted Discounted
Dividend Free Cash Multiples
Model (DDM) Flows (DFCF) Valuation
1
2/26/2024
Intrinsic
value
Terminal
CF CF value
CF CF CF CF
Time
Forecasting period Continuation period
Enterprise value = present value of forecasting period + present value of continuation period
2
2/26/2024
DISCOUNTED DIVIDEND
MODEL (DDM)
d1 d2 d3 Pn
V0
1 r 1 r 2
1 r
3
1 r n
V0
n
dt
n
dt
Pn t 1 1 r t
t 1 1 r
t
1 r n
3
2/26/2024
d1 d 1 g
V0 0 ,r g
re g re g
0.681.06
P0 22.18
0.0925 0.06
4
2/26/2024
A thi
:
phai ve
n
dt Vn
V0
t 1 1 r t 1 r n
d 1 g S 1 g L
n
Vn 0
r gL
gS: growth at extraordinary short-term rate
Two-stage assumes a “drop-off ” gL: normal long-term growth rate (sustainable g)
in growth n: length of high growth period
8
I
⑪i
I
1
3 %
o
1 2 3
• E.g. Mackinac Inc.– current share price is $37; current dividend is $1.37;
dividend growth rate at 8% in the first 3 years, followed by perpetual growth
rate of 3% forever; estimated required return on equity as 10%
• What is Mackinac’s share value
V = $23.04 (overvalued)
D4
0.1 0.03
V
1.1 1.12 1.13 1.13
- -
800 3 %
5
2/26/2024
• Version 2: the H model – high growth period, then declines linearly until reach
normal rate
d 0 1 g L d 0 H g S g L
V0
r gL r gL
gS: growth at extraordinary short-term rate
gL: normal long-term growth rate after year 2H
H: half life in years of high growth period (i.e. high
growth period = 2H years)
• E.g. Vinci SA (DG) – current share price is $57; current dividend is $1.37; initial
dividend growth rate is 24%; declining linearly during a 12-year period to a final
and perpetual growth rate of 6%; estimated required return on equity as 10%
a. What is DG’s share value, using H model?
12
1.371.06
1.37 0.24 0.06
V 2 73.3
0.1 0.06 0.1 0.06
6
2/26/2024
• Version 1: the three distinct stages of growth (with constant growth in the
middle stage)
• Version 2: the growth in the middle stage declines linearly to mature growth
rate
• Dividend will grow at 14% for the next 2 years, 12% for forever
the following 3 years, and 10.2% thereafter 10.2%
1.061.14 1.12
2 3
0.12 0.102 109.7
5 5
1.12 1.12
7
111610 63 %
-
12 % 1
[Fr-gin]
8
.
Du 0 46
68328}
⑧
2/26/2024
-
Da Chenh lich
.
Po
Pitry (D1 D16) 47
.
.. +
12 % I 1 225 10 2 %
.
Sum : .
5152
+ +
.
1
=
(1 r)m 0
=
r)2 15%
%
+
(1 3449
.
+
12 % 101 17
.
2 577 57 7
.
8
A 469 9 3%
. .
Present Value .
5=0 (Mo giam) 12% 11 1
hhong 20 %
.
646
Perpetuity 45 %
Nam trong
nam
0
I
.
85 %
5998
=
= # . .
r g 12 % 12 1
.
10
-
0 45%) 723
.
D5 x (1 12 % 0 .
8 4% Fair value
733
.
Pg
+ -
D6 13 1
.
->
12 %
=
ve
.
% ) 81 95%
:
0
D6 x(1 11 1 8717
%12
. .
Da
+
0 1
M 55
.
.
6 "
$8 46 0 9 04
.
7 5/
r)16 ->
S 2 012
.
.
(1 Do % 16
+ . .
7 4 2 163 7 5% -
"
- .
-
Time
I
I
..1 1
O I
12% 7 5%
189
+
.
S 6
2
91 12% =
7 5 .
%
%
=
90 7 5 2 163
H
= .
.
-
D16 4 39 59113
• E.g. EGN P 15 144 21
=
8915
=
= -
-
.
1
=
r q
.
-
(9 %3 % - 7 5 .
to vicing
7
10 years
DDM - SUMMARY
• In general:
• Growth phase - Use three-stage model
• Transitional phase – Use two-stage / H-model
• Maturity phase – Use GGM
• DDM is appropriate if:
• Company has history of dividend payments
• Dividend related to earnings
• Take minority shareholder perspective
• What if DDM is not appropriate?
FCF
8
2/26/2024
Illustration
Exhibit 5-1: COKE and HRL: The Earnings and Dividends Record
compounding COKE g= g=
HRL
g = 4.4% Payout 8.9% 8.4% Payout
Year EPS ($) DPS ($) (%) EPS ($) DPS ($) (%) Q: Justify whether the
2006 2.55 1.00 39.22 2.05 0.56 27.32 DDM is appropriate
2005 2.53 1.00 39.53 1.82 0.52 28.57 for Coca-Cola
2004 2.41 1.00 41.49 1.65 0.45 27.27 Bottling Co
2003 3.40 1.00 29.41 1.33 0.42 31.58 (COKE) and
2002 2.56 1.00 39.06 1.35 0.39 28.89 Hormel Foods
2001 1.07 1.00 93.46 1.30 0.37 28.46 (HRL)
2000 0.71 1.00 140.85 1.20 0.35 29.17
1999 0.37 1.00 270.27 1.11 0.33 29.73
1998 1.75 1.00 57.14 0.93 0.32 34.41
1997 1.79 1.00 55.87 0.72 0.39 54.17
1996 1.73 1.00 57.80 0.52 0.30 57.69
1995 1.67 1.00 59.88 0.79 0.29 36.71
1994 1.52 1.00 65.79 0.77 0.25 32.47
1993 1.60 0.88 55.00 0.66 0.22 33.33
1992 -0.23 0.88 NM 0.62 0.18 29.03
*NM = not meaningful
DISCOUNTED FREE
CASH FLOWS MODEL
(DCF)
9
2/26/2024
Intrinsic
value
Terminal
FCF FCF value
FCF FCF FCF FCF
Time
Forecasting period Continuation period
Enterprise value = present value of forecasting period + present value of continuation period
10
actions netsales (F A) PRE
Strategic ART/O= - PPE net
2/26/2024
+
xPR + + .
share
,
-Sale= met
-
&sale strategy AR
-
,
ARo
+ PPE gross
I ,
-
+> ADA TIO ⑳S
new deb depr)
=
2
Arga (Accum
-
ru supplie =a
CHOEXPEnetoPPEnoEgrs
SGOA AR
Arg
+ + IS -
history +
in
expD
expycorpNat
.
tax
ax rat
e
Cash flow available to firm’s equity-holders after having made all the required
expenditures and paid debt-holders = (payments/ D retirement – receipts /D issuance)
n Lesson 1: FCFE = residual CFs left over after all of the
FCFE = FCFF + net borrowings
V0 project’s requirements have been satisfied
t 1 1 re
t
and all debt financing has been satisfied
Lesson 2: FCFF = CFs that can be distributed to the
Company’s shareholders (i.e. E-holders)
11
2/26/2024
SUMMARY
• All valuation models derive from the simple dividend discount model.
• Valuation models differ in three key areas: focus, structure, and terminal
value estimation
• The choice of which model(s) to use depends on the nature of the
prediction task and the information upon which forecasts are based.
MULTIPLES VALUATION
MODELS
12
2/26/2024
• Proactive approaches
• Valuation method to determine what a target firm’s value should be
based on future values of cash flows and earnings
• DCF models
• Reactive pricing approaches:
• Models reacting to general rule of thumb and the relative pricing
compared to other securities
• 1. Relative valuation (use of Multiples)
• 2. Break-up analysis (Liquidation), aka SOTP method
13
2/26/2024
RELATIVE VALUATION
14
2/26/2024
SUM-OR-PART VALUATION
SUM-OR-PART VALUATION
15
2/26/2024
$ per share
75.00 $46.5 - $59.10
per share
70.00
65.00 $1.62
$2.00 ($1.95)
$63.37 ($2.30)
60.00 $7.00 $61.75 $61.42
$59.75 $59.10 $59.10
V = 12 * 0.595 = 7.14
55.00
$7.14 $50.41 $52.8
$52.76 $47.38 $49.11 $48.80
V = 24 *50.00
1.901 = 45.62 $1.30 $46.50 $46.50
$5.90 $1.73 ($1.61)
45.00 $45.62 ($2.30)
$41.48
$41.58
40.00 $5.36
$36.12
35.00 V = 9 *0.595 = 5.36
V = 19 * 1.901 = 36.12
30.00
B&R Duracell Oral Care Pers Care Braun Unallocated Net debt Equity
value
16
2/26/2024
65.00
$59.10 $61.85
60.00
$56.00 $56.60 Implied offer
55.00 $50.50 price:
$52.00 $52.80
50.00 $50.25 $54.05
$45.7 $47.10
$46.50
45.00 $45
$43.25
40.00 $40.75
30.00
52 Week PV of Wall SOTP DCF Analysis
trading Street Comparable
range Research price (pretax) Stand Standalone + Standalone +
alone Cost savings total synergies
($9.5) ($14.75)
• Two methods:
1) Fundamentals: requires estimates of g, r, and payout
2) Comparables: uses market data to calculate benchmark
17
2/26/2024
undervalued
S
MY BCTC co'Operating Profit .
=IBIT .
Sak-COGS ↑
=
Net
Current 1-3 Price/Earnings
Deferred (lay Th inflow/ )
CFC
FCFF Tax
Amortiation (H CF)
+
=
:
and cat EPS=
Depreciation (D
...
net
Depreciation =
Purchases of
1- 7 CAPEX prepaid expenses Atebtx (1-tax rate)
=
Fity + debt
+
+
cithe" la -7 Costof x
Change in PE
(-) or (+)
FCFF (550)
raWACC (Cost of equity
x
Ev Expected
late a se
FCFF
-> Eng
E
EU
EPSx Expected PE
nam san
I
-
5)
I1
N
(+ RDx(1
r)
Prich=
-
E
-
xRe)
+
+
-
stock
pay for
E D
Short borrowings Thi try ready to
+
+ term
borrowings ->
Debt Long term (Lay
bi liabilities)
=
over
phon"+" toan
Total PV of FaFF XD PE = 29 5 lan
(Ko
07/share
.
:
PV of FCFF
+
Cha tran
.
-> Sun =
- =
WACC
g
Imag
-
terminat value=
t
X
Market cap x PE
factor Industry average
=
Value Discounted
Terminal x
terminal value
=
Pl of FCFF
+
PV of terminal
value
V
Total Value of
nhat)(2023)
-
value
Enterprise gan
=
nam
Cath A Equivalent =
(lay
Plus :
2023)
Strong Current
asset
Debt Get thuis
ca Cty
Debt Care & Equivalent ;
Less Sum -Enterprise
: :
Vature =
Equity
outstanding
shares of Value
(LD)= Entity
-
18