Research Review Rushzell
Research Review Rushzell
Youth:
A Literature Review
I. Introduction:
II. Body
2
participating with others. The social or nonsocial nature of the usage is
a crucial distinction between different kinds. There are considerable
hurdles in comprehending and measuring these many digital
technology applications. Philosophically and empirically combining all
digital acts into a single predictor of pleasure would always reduce
accuracy.
III. Conclusion
3
parents, educators, and institutions based on inadequate and
inconsistent information about youth and digital technology. Policies
limiting teens' access to new technologies can be futile if these tools are
essential to stimulate social contact or develop digital and relational
(digitally mediated) skills for emerging economies. In terms of health,
reaching young people during crises and when help is needed is most
important. Access to a variety of friendships and services may boost
teen well-being.
IV. References: