Scribd
Upload
24 views2 pages

LABOR - Mega Pro International Business Vs Domingo - Procedural and Substantive Due Process

LABOR - Mega Pro International Business vs Domingo - Procedural and substantive due process

Uploaded by

marcmajadas
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
24 views2 pages

LABOR - Mega Pro International Business Vs Domingo - Procedural and Substantive Due Process

LABOR - Mega Pro International Business vs Domingo - Procedural and substantive due process

Uploaded by

marcmajadas
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

l#

3Republic of tlJe ~bilippinen


$upre1ne <!tourt
jflllnniln

FIRST DIVISION

NOTICE
Sirs/Mesdames:

Please take notice that the Court, First Division, issued a Resolution

dated November 12, 2014 which reads as follows:

"G.R. No. 213146 (Mega-Pro International Resources, Inc./Dr.


Mohammed Al-Shi ha/Regina Ramirez v. Maximo P. Domingo). "." After
a careful perusal of the records, the Court resolves to DENY the instant
petition and AFFIRM the April 3, 2014 Decision 1 and June 23, 2014
Resolution2 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 133416 for
failure of Mega-Pro International Resources, Inc., Dr. Mohammed Al-
Shiha, and Regina Ramirez (petitioners) to show that the CA committed
any reversible error in finding them liable for the illegal dismissal of
Maximo P. Domingo (respondent).

As correctly affirmed by the CA, the National Labor Relations


Commission appropriately ruled that there was no compliance of both the
substantive and procedural due process in the termination of respondent's
services. Not only was he deprived of both notice and opportunity to face
the accusations against him, the purported loss of trust and confidence
belatedly cited as just cause for his termination was also inexistent at the
time respondent received his notice of termination on December 19, 2011.
P~titioners are, therefore, liable· to respondent for the payment of his full
backwages, separation pay and attorney's fees.

The petitioners are hereby required to SUBMIT within five (5) days
from notice hereof, a verified declaration of the petition for review on
certiorari pursuant to A.M. Nos. 10-3-7-SC and 11-9-4-SC.

- over - two (2) pages ..... .

Rollo, pp. 40-52. Penned by Associate Justice Celia C. Librea-Leagogo with Associate
Justices Franchito N. Diamante and Melchor Q.C. Sadang, concurring.

Id. at 53-54.

1~·:, ;-~ t~ ~{·i \ i~·


RESOLUTION 2 G.R. No. 213146
November 12, 2014

SO ORDERED." SERENO, C.J., on official travel; DEL


CASTILLO, J., acting member per S.O. No. 1862 dated November 4,
2014. BERSAMIN, J., on official travel; VELASCO, JR., J., acting
·:'i··:;..it~ijr~!#~t~~~~~:No. 1870 dated November 4, 2014.
I (I I 1.:.!.i. ' ..,,· .
! ·, 1!
.Jn u: ,,.U{.l '· ;
:' ' ( !
n!
\' '.,: ;~r. , ~ ;_, f·, r:'; !:. ; Very truly yours,
'.,J..~:r·~·~
'·"'·-~-, -J
.. ~ ... ~ · \'i"='I " ...
'l - · ..~--·'"
-i- • ·
"•
.'
_
ot:""
..
1
L:
-··
,i ) ~~
......

---··--·- ..... ~ ..... ~. , ___ .._ .., ........ _ . :Vt;


_. ·- •. : 3Ml.,

Division Clerk of Court


~2
Atty. Felomino E. Mongan Court of Appeals (x)
Counsel for Petitioners Manila
Suite 502-B, 5111 Flr. (CA-G.R. SP No. 133416)
Web-Jet Bldg.
64 Quezon Ave. cor. BMA Rd. Mr. Maximo P. Domingo
1100 Quezon City Respondent
#1 Narcisus St. cor. Camella St.
Green Park Village
Cainta 1900 Rizal

NA TI ON AL LABOR RELATIONS
COMMISSION
PPSTA Bldg., Banawe St.
1100 Quezon City
(NLRC NCR Case No. 03-04455-12;
NLRC LAC No. 01-000519-13)

Public Information Office (x)


Library Services (x)
Supreme Court
(For uploading pursuant to A.M.
No. 12-1-7-SC)

Judgment Division (x)


Supreme Court

SR
J

You might also like