Report SNS
Report SNS
Kireyeva, Myoung-Kil Youn / Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business 5-1 (2014) 27-37 27
Received: October 09, 2013. Revised: December 29, 2013. Accepted: March 17, 2014.
This study is quite unique in that found out characteristics of has easy interlocking with external networks to give users con-
SNS by using SNS related literatures, and researched models of venience and to have very good expansion. Classmates.com,
precedent studies, and investigated effects of characteristics of the first SNS, launched service in 1995. The online site built up
SNS upon consumers’ awareness, purchase intention and online network by using a list of friends. So, consumer SNS are
recommendation. The purpose of the study was to investigate social networking websites, which are open to the public. In
use of marketing tool of SNS. South Korea, in 2001, 'Cyworld' started to expand SNS market
The purposes of the study were: (Lee, 2013). In Kazakhstan social networks came later, in 2007
First, the study kept SNS concept and characteristics and us- with the advent of ‘Kiwi’, ‘Yvision’ and ‘Jnet’.
age state of SNS users in order by using literature, Internet and It should be noted that organizations, which learn and adapt
other media. of SNS will have a distinct advantage in the market and ulti-
Second, the study investigated effects of variables of charac- mately increase their productivity (Caloisi, 2008). Since 2007,
teristics of SNS upon consumers’ awareness. number of SNS users rapidly increased as much as 174% (Lee,
Third, the study investigated effects of characteristics of SNS 2013). Internet users got access to SNS site one minute per 5
upon consumers’ awareness that had influence upon purchase minutes. One third of SNS users in the world lived in Asia an
intention and recommendation. Pacific rim. And, in Latin America, one of Internet user spent
Lastly, the study verified effects of characteristics of SNS to 7.6 hours on average to get access to SNS. Facebook took the
find out factors and to give implications for marketing strategies lead in social network service business, followed by Twitter and
and effective use of SNS. Google Plus. In January 2013, Global Web Index said that
The rest of the manuscript is organized as follows. In Section Google Plus had the largest number of users based on active
2, the concept of SNS and concept and precedent studies of usage, followed by Twitter, YouTube and Twitter in order.
the variables are described. Section 3 presents a methodology, Facebook had the largest number of users of 670 million users
in particular recommend models and hypotheses, and Section 4 as of last day of December 2012 based on active usage, fol-
describes the details of the experiment and evaluations. Finally, lowed by 340 million users of Google Plus and 280 million
Section 5 concluding part. users of YouTube (Forbes, 2013, January).
platform and site that have mutual network and sharing between In their forties 16.9 83.1
the ones who share interests and activities to do social net- In their fifties or higher 2.6 97.4
working (Seol, 2011). SNS that allows users to share contents Source: Shin (2013)
Yong-Min Kim, Anel A. Kireyeva, Myoung-Kil Youn / Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business 5-1 (2014) 27-37 29
Utilization rate of SNS varied a little depending upon ages, 2.2.3. Enjoyment
and the ones in their teens, thirties and forties often made use
Compensation, motivation and pleasure were needed to make
of Kakao Story, and the ones in their twenties did Facebook
use of SNS effectively and to develop community. Good quality
(Shin, 2013).
information and contents and easy retrieval are important, and
pleasure, happiness and other enjoyment factors shall be ac-
<Table 2> Utilization Rate of SNS depending upon ages (Unit: %)
tively supplied (Lee, 2012). SNS has characteristics of pleasure,
Ranking Teens 20s 30s 40s
interaction and relations (Pfeil et. al., 2009), and consumers
Kakao Story Facebook Kakao Story Kakao Story
1 have interests and pleasure at exchange of messages in the
(33) (38.9) (41.4) (39.6)
use of services (Lee et al., 2012).
Cyworld Mini
Facebook Twitter Facebook Consumers can experience pleasure, practice and values in
2 Homepage
(23.9) (22) (23.2) the use of SNS at the same time (Jones et. al (2006), and
(19.1)
Cyworld Mini
self-efficacy, pleasure and learning purpose have significant in-
Kakao Story Facebook Twitter fluence upon use of the system at the study on forecast of web
3 Homepage
(20.8) (18.8) (22.7)
(23) based information system (Yi & Hwang, 2003). The enjoyment
Cyworld Mini Cyworld Mini was assumed to have influence upon consumers' attitudes ac-
Twitter Twitter
4 Homepage Homepage cording to precedent studies.
(13.8) (18.2)
(15.2) (9.4)
Miscellaneous Miscellaneous Miscellaneous Miscellaneous 2.2.4. Reliability
5
(6.4) (3.1) (2.6) (5.1)
The reliability is said to be a receiver's cognition on the supply
Source: Shin (2013)
of unprejudicial opinions and/or objective information with knowl-
edge, technology and experience of communication subject (Belch,
2.2. Concept and Precedent Studies of the Variables
1990). Users shall be given reliability to elevate customer loyalty
online by saying reliability on blog review information (Chu & Roh,
In each of the previous studies, and does not override varia-
2012), and reliability of the information source may have the great-
bles for this study would like to take advantage of the in-
est influence upon attitude to the product (Kim et al., 2011). High
dependent variables.
reliability was found to have great influence upon attitude at prece-
dent studies: In this study, reliability of SNS was assumed to have
2.2.1. Interaction
affirmative influence upon attitude to the product.
The interaction means actions and/or effects between two or
more persons and between two or more media (Liu & Shrum, 2.2.5. consumers’ awareness
2002). The interaction expanded concept in multi-dimension way
The consumers’ awarenessis said to be tendency that con-
to exchange and share information between sender and user
sumers take either favorable or unfavorable actions on the prod-
and to create values jointly (Kim et al., 2008). The character-
uct (Allport, 1953). The attitude can be made not by born but
istics of SNS included mutual connections (Shuo & Lee, 2012)
by an individual's experience depending upon specific object
and Yang & Kim, 2013). In this study, good interaction was as-
and/or situation. The attitude expresses internal impression that
sumed to have affirmative influence upon consumers’ awareness
reflects an individual's favorable and/or unfavorable inclination
in accordance with precedent studies.
against an object, and it cannot be watched by results of psy-
chological course to infer it by an individual's sayings and/or be-
2.2.2. Information Service
havior (Cho et al., 2012). In this study, consumers' attitude was
Consumers are allowed to share information on product and thought to be important at selection of the product.
services by SNS and to make decision easily. Consumers rely
upon the information by sharing experience (Cho et al., 2012). 2.2.6. Purchase Intention
Generally speaking, consumers who have experienced con-
The purchase intention that consumers want to buy products
sumption could accumulate information on the service and make
means an individual's intention of specific behavior at the mar-
final decision based on the information (Smith & Swinyard,
keting (Cho et al., 2012). Marketing managers make use of con-
1982). The information service is said to give users various
sumers' purchase intention to evaluate not only concept of alter-
kinds of contents at the use of SNS service (Hong, 2012), and
native products but also subject of the advertising. The pur-
information service of SNS had positive influence upon consum-
chase intention is said to be probability that makes change of
ers’ awareness. In this study, consumers’ awareness might vary
either behavior expected or future behavior planned of in-
depending upon supply of the information according to prece-
dividuals into belief and/or attitudes (Engel and Blackwell, 1982).
dent studies.
Distribution of SNS had relation with purchase intention in the
Korean society (Kim et al., 2012).
30 Yong-Min Kim, Anel A. Kireyeva, Myoung-Kil Youn / Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business 5-1 (2014) 27-37
The recommendation informs friends, intimates and family This study investigated effects of SNS effects upon consum-
members of experience of satisfactory and/or unsatisfactory ers’ awareness, purchase intention and recommendation, and
product (Rinchins, 1983). and it gives information of product developed models.
and/or services by dialog regardless of individual's commercial Independent variables of interaction, supply of the information,
interests (Chun & Park, 2011). enjoyment and reliability were used in accordance with studies
of not only Agarwal & Venkatesh (2002) but also Mckinny et al.
(2002). Parameters included attitude to the product (Lee et al.,
3. Methodologies 2004), and dependent variables did purchase intention and rec-
ommendation (Tylor & Baker, 1994) (Fig 1).
The models based on precedent studies were (Fig 1):
3.1. Models and Hypotheses
So, in research presents a model, which is intended to ex- characteristics of SNS attitude to the product and purchase in-
plain the role of the perceived benefits of using social network- tention by using marketing cases. In this study, independent
ing sites and integration of services. S-O-R model of consumer variables such as information-provision, enjoyment and inter-
behavior evolves from the simple return value to the final action were used to test hypotheses, and information-provision
model. Stimulus is conceptualized as an influence that causes a had the greatest influence. Hypotheses were used to inspect ef-
person. It is the factor that affects all the processes, these fac- fects of characteristics of SNS upon consumers’ awareness:
tors include all objects, namely, products, brands, logos, adver- Hypothesis 1. The characteristics of SNS has positive influ-
tisements, packages, rates, shops and storage conditions, ence upon consumers’ awareness.
word-of-mouth communication, and countless other factors 1-1. The interaction of SNS has positive influence upon con-
(Jacoby, 2002). Model studies on the basis of the S-O-R model sumers’ awareness.
(stimulus-organism-response), in the framework involves the mo- 1-2. The information-provide of SNS has positive influence
tivations of using social networking sites and integration of on- upon consumers’ awareness.
line sites impact on satisfaction and perception of the internal 1-3. The enjoyment of SNS has positive influence upon con-
conditions that intervene with the behavior of responses sumers’ awareness.
(purchase intention). 1-4. The reliability of SNS has positive influence upon con-
sumers’ awareness.
3.1.2. Hypotheses
The consumers’ awareness has affirmative influence upon
The study followed precedent study on effect on character-
product quality and values to have influence upon continuous
istics of SNS upon attitude to the product, purchase intention
selection of the product (Dodds et al., 1991).
and recommendation (Hong, 2012), and inspected effects of
Yong-Min Kim, Anel A. Kireyeva, Myoung-Kil Youn / Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business 5-1 (2014) 27-37 31
me2day) (147 persons, 35.7%) in order. <Table 7> Use of SNS a day N(%)
Use of SNS was (Table 5): Gender Age
Description Wome total
Men <20 20~24 25~29 >30
<Table 5> Use of SNS N(%) n
Gender Age less than 53 59 8 73 28 3 112
Description Wo Total 1 hour (12.9) (14.3) (1.9) (17.7) (6.8) (0.7) (27.2)
Men <20 20~24 25~29 >30
men 1~less than 45 59 18 66 17 3 104
108 224 72 212 41 7 322 2 hour (10.9) (14.3) (4.4) (16.0) (4.1) (0.7) (25.2)
Yes
Commun (26.2) (54.4) (17.5) (51.5) (10.0) (1.7) (80.6) 2~less than 31 63 31 60 2 1 94
ities 50 30 24 43 13 80 Use a 3 hours (7.5) (15.3) (7.5) (14.6) (0.5) (0.2) (22.8)
No 0
(12.1) (7.3) (5.8) (10.4) (3.2) (19.4) day 3~less than 12 38 18 28 4 50
0
97 190 64 178 38 7 287 4 hours (2.9) (9.2) (4.4) (6.8) (1.0) (12.1)
Yes
(23.5) (46.1) (15.5) (43.2) (9.2) (1.7) (69.7) 4hours of 17 35 21 28 3 52
Blog 0
61 64 32 77 16 125 more (14.1) (8.5) (5.1) (6.8) (0.7) (12.6)
No 0
(14.8) (15.5) (7.8) (18.7) (3.9) (30.3) 412
x²(p-value) 11.083(.026) 57.168(.000)
50 97 44 77 21 5 147 (100.0)
Use Yes
Microme (12.1) (23.5) (10.7) (18.7) (5.1) (1.2) (35.7)
of
dia 108 157 52 178 33 2 265
SNS No
(26.2) (38.1) (12.6) (43.2) (8.0) (0.5) (64.3) The interviewees made use of smart phone the most
144 250 94 242 51 7 394 (91.3%), and SNS media were not independent at the gender
Yes
Social (35.0) (60.7) (22.8) (58.7) (12.4) (1.7) (95.6) (P<.05).
Networks 14 4 2 13 3 18
No 0 See Table 8 of SNS media.
(3.4) (1.0) (0.5) (3.2) (0.7) (4.4)
97 196 66 188 34 5 293
Yes <Table 8> SNS media N(%)
(23.5) (47.6) (16.0) (45.6) (8.3) (1.2) (71.1)
Video
61 58 30 67 20 2 119 Gender Age
No Description Total
(14.8) (14.1) (7.3) (16.3) (4.9) (0.5) (28.9)
Men Women <20 20~24 25~29 >30
<Table 9> Purposes of Use of SNS N(%) The interviewees (62.1%) said that they experienced buying
Gender Age of an event of SNS, for instance, food (46.9%) to be the high-
Description Wo Total est, followed by fashion accessories and general goods (26.6%),
Men <20 20~24 25~29 >30
men mobile phone (9.8%), household items (4.3%), miscellaneous
Human goods (4.3%), game (3.1%) and home appliances (2.7%) in
20 15 4 23 8 35
relations 0 order.
(4.9) (3.6) (1.0) (5.6) (1.9) (8.5)
management
Kinds of buying varied depending upon ages: So, the ones
Self-expressi 21 28 10 25 14 49
0 who were less than 20 years old bought food (20.7%) the most,
on space (5.1) (6.8) (2.4) (6.1) (3.4) (11.9)
Communicat 33 79 33 74 3 2 112 and not only the ones who were 20 to 24 years old but also
ion (8.0) (19.2) (8.0) (18.0) (0.7) (0.5) (27.2) the ones who were 25 to 29 years old did fashion accessories
Leisure & 46 76 31 76 13 2 122 (22.7%) and general merchandise (3.1%), and the ones who
hobby (11.2) (18.4) (7.5) (18.4) (3.2) (0.5) (29.6) were 30 years old or more did mobile phone (0.8%).
Purposes
of use Learning of
Buying experience and kinds on SNS were (table 11):
information 30 49 14 50 12 3 79
and (7.3) (11.9) (3.4) (12.1) (2.9) (0.7) (19.2) <Table 11> Buying Experience and Kinds on SNS N(%)
knowledge
Gender Age
Economic 2 2 2 Description Wo Total
0 0 0 0 Men <20 20~24 25~29 >30
activities (0.5) (0.5) (0.5) men
Miscellaneo 8 5 4 5 4 13 59 161 72 148 31 5 256
0 Buying Yes
us (1.9) (1.2) (1.0) (1.2) (1.0) (3.2) (23.1) (39.1) (17.5) (35.9) (7.5) (1.2) (62.1)
Burying experie
412 63 93 24 107 23 2 156
x²(p-value) 13.616(.034) 37.856(.004) experien nce No
(100.0) (15.3) (22.6) (5.8) (26.0) (5.6) (0.5) (37.9)
ce
412
x²(p-value) 0.440(.507) 9.342(.025)
(100.0)
47 73 53 53 13 1 120
62.6% of the interviewees participated in an event of SNS in Food
(18.4) (28.5) (20.7) (20.7) (5.1) (0.4) (46.9)
order of free gift (38.8%), joint purchase (32.2%), discount cou- Fashion
pon (21.3%) and miscellaneous (5.4%). accessories
20 48 1 58 8 1 68
& general
The interviewees participated in an event by ages: joint pur- (7.8) (18.8) (0.4) (22.7) (3.1) (0.4) (26.6)
merchandis
chase of the ones who were less than 20 years old (16.7%), e
free gift of the ones who 20 to 24 years old (31.4%), and joint Mobile 10 15 8 10 5 2 25
phone (3.9) (5.9) (3.1) (3.9) (2.0) (0.8) (9.8)
purchase of the ones who were 25 to 29 years old (5.0%), and Kinds of
Game 5 3 1 7 8
joint purchase of the ones who were more than 30 years old buying 0 0
product (2.0) (1.2) (0.4) (2.7) (3.1)
(1.2%). Home 3 4 1 2 4 7
0
Purposes of use of SNS were (table 10); appliance (1.2) (1.6) (0.4) (0.8) (1.6) (2.7)
Household 5 12 4 11 1 1 17
items (2.0) (4.7) (1.6) (4.3) (0.4) (0.4) (4.3)
<Table 10> SNS Event Experience and Kinds N(%) Miscellaneo 5 6 4 7 11
0 0
Gender Age us (2.0) (2.3) (1.6) (2.7) (4.3)
Description Wom Total 256
Men <20 20~24 25~29 >30 x²(p-value) 5.102(.531) 69.839(.000)
en (100.0)
87 171 65 160 27 6 258
Event Yes (21.1) (41.5) (15.8) (38.8) (6.6) (1.5) (62.6)
Event experien
experien ce No
71 83 31 95 27 1 154 4.3. Validity and Reliability of Test Tools
(17.2) (20.1) (7.5) (23.1) (6.6) (0.2) (37.4)
ce
412
x²(p-value) 6.255(.012) 6.333(.096) This study investigated factors of test items of each variable
(100.0)
free gift
34 66 10 81 7 2 100 to examine factors of 29 items. The study investigated factors
(13.2) (25.6) (3.9) (31.4) (2.7) (0.8) (38.8)
by varimax rotation to regard 0.50 or more of factor loading as
Joint 24 59 43 24 13 3 83
an important variable. The study excluded questions with low
purchase (9.3) (22.9) (16.7) (9.3) (5.0) (1.2) (32.2)
Discount 18 37 2 47 6 55 factor loading (information supply 4). Cronbach'α was used to
0
coupon (7.0) (14.3) (0.8) (18.2) (2.3) (21.3) verify internal consistency between questions. Cronbach'α was
Kinds of Love related 1 2 2 1 3 0.70 or higher to test specific items at reliable level.
0 0
event products (0.4) (0.8) (0.8) (0.4) (1.2)
Table 12 of validity and reliability test was:
2 1 2 1 3
Job seeking 0 0
(0.8) (0.4) (0.8) (0.4) (1.2)
Miscellaneou 8 6 8 5 1 14
0
s (3.1) (2.3) (3.1) (1.9) (0.4) (5.4)
258
x²(p-value) 5.779(.328) 88.468(.000)
(100.0)
34 Yong-Min Kim, Anel A. Kireyeva, Myoung-Kil Youn / Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business 5-1 (2014) 27-37
phone users. An investigation with parameters of not only Attitudes, Purchase Intention, and Recommending
non-adult but also adult could investigate customized marketing. Behavior. Seoul, Korea: Yonsei University The Graduate
Further studies were needed to supplement the limitations School
and to establish various kinds of SNS marketing strategies in Kim, Eun-Mee, Lim, Sohye, & Ham, Sun Hea (2008). Effects of
detail. Interactivity and Involvement in the User’s Information
Processing and Emotional Responses. Korean journal of
journalism & communication studies, 52(4), 250-277.
References Kim, Moon-Jung, Oh, Young-Ye, & Kim, Ki-Soo (2011). An
Influence of Distributor's Corporate Image on Consumer
Behavior Towards PB Products. Journal of Distribution
Allport, F. H. (1953). The effect of segregation and the con-
Science, 9(4), 83-91
sequences of desegregation: A social science statement.
Kim, Wanki, Lee, Suk Jun, & Youn, Myoung-Kil (2012). Portfolio
Minnesota law review, 37, 429-440. for Social Commerce Growth Using Customer
Agarwal, R., & Venkatesh, V. (2002). Assessing a Firm's Web
Repurchase Intention Factors: The Case of Korea. AISS:
Presence: A Heuristic Evaluation Procedure for the
Advances in Information Sciences and Service Sciences,
Measurement of Usability. Information Systems 4(23), 1-15.
Research, 13(2), 168-186. Liu, Y., & Shrum, L. J. (2002). What is interactivity and is it al-
Caloisi, G. (2008). Social networks at work. AV Magazine,
ways such a good thing? Implications of definition, per-
14-15.
son, and situation for the influence of interactivity on ad-
Cho, Young-Sang, Heo, Jeong-Yoon & Youn, Myoung-Kil(2012).
vertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 53–
Korean Customer Attitudes Towards SNS Shopping.
64.
Journal of Distribution Science, 10(8), 7-14. Seol, Jinah (2011). Social media and social change. Seoul,
Chu, Wu-Jin, & Roh, Min-Jung (2012). The Effect of
Korea: Communication Books.
Consumers` Value Motives on the Perception of Blog
Lee, Joo-Young (2013). Status and utilization of social media
Reviews Credibility: the Moderation Effect of Tie
services. Broadcasting and Communications Policy,
Strength. Asia Marketing Journal, 13(4), 159-189.
25(9), 45-56.
Chun, Tae-Yoo, & Park, No-Hyun (2011). The Effect of
Lee, Moonkyu, Kim, Tae-Young, and Kim, Hyun-Kyung (2004).
Measurements on Customer`s Positive Emotion,
The Effects of Brand Community on Consumer Attitude.
Relationship Quality, Word of Mouth, and
Korean Marketing Review, 19(3), 197-224.
Recommendations in Convention Industry. Korea
Lee, Nae-Joon (2012). Comparative Analysis of Intention to Use
Logistics Review, 21(3), 88-111. Toward Smartphone Between Korean and Chinese
Davenport, T, & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge, Boston,
Consumers. Korea Logistics Review, 22(4), 99-127.
MA.: Harvard Business School Press.
Lee, Suk-Jun, Youn, Myoung-Kil, & Kim, Wan-ki(2012).
Dodds, William B., Monroe, Kent B., and Grewal, Dhruv (1991).
Antecedents to Customer Repurchase in Korean Social
Effects of Price, Brand and Store Information on Buyers'
Commerce Service. Journal of Distribution Science,
Product Evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28
10(3), 7-13
(August): 307-317.
McKinney, V., Yoon, K., & Zahedi, F. (2002). The
eMARKETER (2013). Where in the World Are the hottest Social
Measurement of Web-Customer Satisfaction: An
Networking Countries? Retrieved December 11, 2013, Expectation and Disconfirmation Approach. Information
from http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1008870
System Research, 13(3), 296-315.
&e.cid=a6506033675d47f881651943c21c5ed4
Pfeil, U., Arjan, R., & Zaphiris, P. (2009). Age differences in on-
Engel, J. F., and Blackwell, R. D. (1982). Consumer Behavior
line social networking: A study of user profiles and the
(4th ed). Chicago, IL: Dryden Press.
social capital divide among teenagers and older users in
Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, & C., Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of
My Space. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 643-654.
Facebook ‘‘Friends:’’ Social capital and college stu-
Richins, M. L. (1983). Negative word-of-mouth by dissatisfied
dents’use of online social network sites, Journal of
customers : a pilot s tudy. Journal of Marketing, 47,
Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168.
68-78.
Forbes (2013). Watch Out Facebook, With Google+ at #2 and
Richter, A., & Koch, M.(2008). Functions of Social Networking
YouTube at #3, Google, Inc. Could Catch Up. Retrieved Services. In: Proc. 8TH International Conference on the
January 26, 2013, from http://www.forbes.com/sites/
Design of Cooperative Systems, Carry-le-rouet, France,
anthonykosner/2013/01/26/watch-out-face
Institut d'Etudes Politiques d'Aix-en-Provence, 87-98.
Jacoby, J. (2002). Stimulus-Organism-Response Reconsidered:
Shuo, Zhang, & Lee, Jong-Ho (2012). A study on the develop-
An Evolutionary Step in Modeling (Consumer) Behavior,
ment and prospect of social media Korea VS. China.
Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12 (1), 51-57.
Journal of KECRA, 13(1), 3-22.
Hong, Da-Un (2011). He Impact of SNS Characteristics on
Yong-Min Kim, Anel A. Kireyeva, Myoung-Kil Youn / Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business 5-1 (2014) 27-37 37
Shin, Sun (2013). SNS (social network service) usage. KISDI Intentions. Journal of Retailing, 70(2), 163–178.
STAT Report, 13(4), 11-15. Yang, Hoe-Chang, & Kim, Jong-Lak (2013). The Influence of
Smith, R. E., and Swinyard, W.R.(1982). Information Response Perceived Characteristics of SNS, External Influence and
Models: An Integrated Approach. Journal of Marketing, Information Overload on SNS Satisfaction and Using
46, 81-93. Reluctant Intention. in proceedings of fourth international
Taylor, S. A., and Baker, T. L. (1994). An Assessment of the conference(447-454), Retrieved January 26, 2013, from
Relationship between Service Quality and Customer from http://kodisa.org/Proceeding/13119
Satisfaction in the Formation of Consumers’Purchase