0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views

JU Project - VC0-Report

Solar

Uploaded by

ahnaft44
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views

JU Project - VC0-Report

Solar

Uploaded by

ahnaft44
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

Version 7.3.

PVsyst - Simulation report


Grid-Connected System

Project: JU test Project


Variant: JU simulation variant
Trackers single array
System power: 30.8 kWp
Dakshin Krok - Bangladesh

Author
Project: JU test Project
Variant: JU simulation variant

PVsyst V7.3.1
VC0, Simulation date:
09/19/24 14:26
with v7.3.1

Project summary
Geographical Site Situation Project settings
Dakshin Krok Latitude 23.88 °N Albedo 0.20
Bangladesh Longitude 90.27 °E
Altitude 23 m
Time zone UTC+6

Meteo data
Dakshin Krok
Meteonorm 8.1 (1991-2012), Sat=100% - Synthetic

System summary
Grid-Connected System Trackers single array

PV Field Orientation Near Shadings


Orientation Tracking algorithm Linear shadings
Tracking plane, horizontal N-S axis Astronomic calculation
Axis azimuth 90.2 °

System information
PV Array Inverters
Nb. of modules 70 units Nb. of units 1 unit
Pnom total 30.8 kWp Pnom total 30.0 kWac
Pnom ratio 1.027

User's needs
Unlimited load (grid)

Results summary
Produced Energy 34716 kWh/year Specific production 1127 kWh/kWp/year Perf. Ratio PR 66.83 %

Table of contents
Project and results summary 2
General parameters, PV Array Characteristics, System losses 3
Near shading definition - Iso-shadings diagram 5
Main results 6
Loss diagram 7
Predef. graphs 8
Single-line diagram 9

09/19/24 Page 2/9


Project: JU test Project
Variant: JU simulation variant

PVsyst V7.3.1
VC0, Simulation date:
09/19/24 14:26
with v7.3.1

General parameters
Grid-Connected System Trackers single array

PV Field Orientation
Orientation Tracking algorithm Trackers configuration
Tracking plane, horizontal N-S axis Astronomic calculation Nb. of trackers 4 units
Axis azimuth 90.2 ° Single array
Sizes
Tracker Spacing 5.00 m
Collector width 2.12 m
Ground Cov. Ratio (GCR) 42.5 %
Phi min / max. -/+ 90.0 °
Shading limit angles
Phi limits for BT -/+ 64.7 °
Models used
Transposition Perez
Diffuse Perez, Meteonorm
Circumsolar separate

Horizon Near Shadings User's needs


Free Horizon Linear shadings Unlimited load (grid)

PV Array Characteristics
PV module Inverter
Manufacturer Generic Manufacturer Generic
Model Mono 440 Wp Twin 144 half-cells Model 30 kWac inverter
(Original PVsyst database) (Original PVsyst database)
Unit Nom. Power 440 Wp Unit Nom. Power 30.0 kWac
Number of PV modules 70 units Number of inverters 1 unit
Nominal (STC) 30.8 kWp Total power 30.0 kWac
Modules 5 Strings x 14 In series Operating voltage 450-700 V
At operating cond. (50°C) Pnom ratio (DC:AC) 1.03
Pmpp 27.97 kWp
U mpp 525 V
I mpp 53 A

Total PV power Total inverter power


Nominal (STC) 31 kWp Total power 30 kWac
Total 70 modules Number of inverters 1 unit
Module area 156 m² Pnom ratio 1.03
Cell area 139 m²

Array losses
Thermal Loss factor DC wiring losses Module Quality Loss
Module temperature according to irradiance Global array res. 165 mΩ Loss Fraction -0.4 %
Uc (const) 20.0 W/m²K Loss Fraction 1.5 % at STC
Uv (wind) 0.0 W/m²K/m/s

Module mismatch losses Strings Mismatch loss


Loss Fraction 2.0 % at MPP Loss Fraction 0.1 %

09/19/24 Page 3/9


Project: JU test Project
Variant: JU simulation variant

PVsyst V7.3.1
VC0, Simulation date:
09/19/24 14:26
with v7.3.1

Array losses
IAM loss factor
Incidence effect (IAM): Fresnel, AR coating, n(glass)=1.526, n(AR)=1.290

0° 30° 50° 60° 70° 75° 80° 85° 90°


1.000 0.999 0.987 0.962 0.892 0.816 0.681 0.440 0.000

09/19/24 Page 4/9


Project: JU test Project
Variant: JU simulation variant

PVsyst V7.3.1
VC0, Simulation date:
09/19/24 14:26
with v7.3.1

Near shadings parameter


Perspective of the PV-field and surrounding shading scene

Iso-shadings diagram
Orientation #1

09/19/24 Page 5/9


Project: JU test Project
Variant: JU simulation variant

PVsyst V7.3.1
VC0, Simulation date:
09/19/24 14:26
with v7.3.1

Main results
System Production
Produced Energy 34716 kWh/year Specific production 1127 kWh/kWp/year
Performance Ratio PR 66.83 %

Normalized productions (per installed kWp) Performance Ratio PR

Balances and main results

GlobHor DiffHor T_Amb GlobInc GlobEff EArray E_Grid PR


kWh/m² kWh/m² °C kWh/m² kWh/m² kWh kWh ratio
January 104.1 63.25 17.01 134.2 75.3 2127 1951 0.472
February 112.7 61.71 20.94 134.9 86.0 2380 2198 0.529
March 155.3 81.05 25.77 168.2 154.7 4122 3838 0.741
April 156.9 88.86 27.66 160.2 156.9 4163 3874 0.785
May 158.9 95.83 28.33 159.7 155.5 4134 3845 0.782
June 133.7 90.07 28.16 134.0 129.2 3472 3220 0.780
July 127.2 92.79 28.54 127.4 122.9 3326 3081 0.785
August 135.4 87.89 28.69 136.5 133.1 3573 3313 0.788
September 125.8 76.18 28.01 130.9 125.9 3379 3132 0.777
October 119.7 70.69 27.15 133.4 104.3 2809 2597 0.632
November 108.4 60.10 23.00 138.8 77.4 2129 1956 0.458
December 97.8 59.72 18.86 128.5 66.7 1877 1712 0.433
Year 1535.8 928.14 25.20 1686.6 1387.8 37491 34716 0.668

Legends
GlobHor Global horizontal irradiation EArray Effective energy at the output of the array
DiffHor Horizontal diffuse irradiation E_Grid Energy injected into grid
T_Amb Ambient Temperature PR Performance Ratio
GlobInc Global incident in coll. plane
GlobEff Effective Global, corr. for IAM and shadings

09/19/24 Page 6/9


Project: JU test Project
Variant: JU simulation variant

PVsyst V7.3.1
VC0, Simulation date:
09/19/24 14:26
with v7.3.1

Loss diagram
1536 kWh/m² Global horizontal irradiation
+9.8% Global incident in coll. plane
-16.09% Near Shadings: irradiance loss

-1.94% IAM factor on global

1388 kWh/m² * 156 m² coll. Effective irradiation on collectors

efficiency at STC = 19.80% PV conversion

42805 kWh Array nominal energy (at STC effic.)


-1.09% PV loss due to irradiance level

-9.08% PV loss due to temperature

+0.37% Module quality loss

-2.10% Mismatch loss, modules and strings


-0.89% Ohmic wiring loss
37491 kWh Array virtual energy at MPP

-7.38% Inverter Loss during operation (efficiency)

0.00% Inverter Loss over nominal inv. power


0.00% Inverter Loss due to max. input current
0.00% Inverter Loss over nominal inv. voltage
-0.02% Inverter Loss due to power threshold
0.00% Inverter Loss due to voltage threshold
34716 kWh Available Energy at Inverter Output
34716 kWh Energy injected into grid

09/19/24 Page 7/9


Project: JU test Project
Variant: JU simulation variant

PVsyst V7.3.1
VC0, Simulation date:
09/19/24 14:26
with v7.3.1

Predef. graphs
Daily Input/Output diagram

System Output Power Distribution

09/19/24 Page 8/9


PVsyst V7.3.1
VC0, Simulation date:
09/19/24 14:26
with v7.3.1

You might also like