SHRM Module 4
SHRM Module 4
MATERIALS
By using these SHRM HRMP™ Learning System student materials (the ―Materials‖), the user
(―User‖) hereby agrees as follows:
(i) That the Society For Human Resource Management (SHRM) is the exclusive
copyright owner of the Materials.
(ii) Provided that the required fee for use of the Materials by User has been paid to
SHRM or its agent, User has the right, by this License, to use the Materials solely for his/her
own educational use.
(iii) User has no right to make copies, in any media, of the materials, or to sell, or
sublicense, loan, or otherwise convey or distribute these materials or any copies.
Module 4: Measurement
Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... vi
Welcome to the SHRM HRMP™ Learning System ................................................................. viii
Getting Started ...................................................................................................................... viii
SHRM HRMP™ Learning System Structure .......................................................................... ix
Learning System Development ............................................................................................. xii
Information About Certification ........................................................................................... xiii
HR Certification Institute HRMP™ Knowledge Base .......................................................... xiv
The SHRM HRMP Learning System is intended to cover the Knowledge Base assessed by the
HR Certification Institute examination. The system’s contents may not compare exactly to the
exam and there will be some content in the exam that is not included in the learning system.
SHRM makes no claim that the use of this material guarantees passage of the HR Certification
Institute examination.
Getting Started
You have already purchased and obtained this module through the Online
Learning Center. Note that the complete SHRM HRMP Learning System is
comprised of four modules.
Be sure to familiarize yourself with the Online Learning Center
(https://www.epathcampus.com/SHRM/onlinelearningcenter/login/) where
you can find all modules purchased to date, as well as additional learning
aids, practice tests, e-flashcards and case studies. If you have not already
done so, take the Online Learning Center Orientation by clicking on the
corresponding link.
First, go to the Practice Tests on the Online Learning Center and take the
Test Your Knowledge – Readiness Test. This will help you determine
how to focus your study.
Next, carefully read and study this module, Module 4: Measurement.
Return to the Online Learning Center as directed in the module.
When finished with this module, take the Module 4 Practice Test on the
Online Learning Center, and use the flash cards and case studies for
additional practice.
When ready, take the HRMP Certification Practice Test on the Online
Learning Center.
Purchase and study additional SHRM HRMP Learning System modules
as needed.
The learning system offers many features that allow you to learn in the way you
feel most comfortable.
The SHRM HRMP Learning System consists of a set of modules based on the
four domains in the HR Certification Institute’s HRMP Knowledge Base. In the
following table, the percentages represent the proportion of HRMP certification
test questions that are based on the domains.
© 2011 SHRM ix
Module 4: Measurement
Each section in the SHRM HRMP Learning System modules begins by stating
the behaviors, skills and knowledge from the Knowledge Base addressed in that
section.
© 2011 SHRM x
Module 4: Measurement
Icons that call your attention to specific content. These icons appear as
follows:
Directs you to other portions of the SHRM HRMP Learning System (such
as other modules and sections).
https://www.epathcampus.com/SHRM/onlinelearningcenter/login/
© 2011 SHRM xi
Module 4: Measurement
Practice tests
o Test your knowledge – readiness test
o Practice test for each module (with individual item feedback)
o HRMP© certification practice test
Be sure that you use all of the SHRM HRMP Learning System components.
Together, the components help you learn and retain key content and prepare
for the certification exam.
Each team member brought a special perspective and talent to the development
effort.
Revisions to the materials are regularly scheduled to ensure that the learning
system content is updated as the HR profession changes.
Below are the behaviors, skills and knowledge required for mastery of content
related to Module 4: Measurement. The percentage after the heading represents
the percentage of questions on the HRMP exam based on the Knowledge Base
domain defined by the HR Certification Institute.
02. Establish and analyze HR metrics as they relate to the organization’s goals (for example,
employment statistics, return on investment [ROI] of HR activities, employee satisfaction
surveys, productivity data, organizational analysis)
03. Connect individual and team performance to organizational measures of success and report
the metrics to management
04. Establish and manage key performance indicators (for example, outsourcing data, cost per
hire, HR measurement tools [scorecards] and trend analyses)
01. Quantitative metrics (for example, the numbers of employees lost or gained and recruiting
statistics)
03. Performance management processes (for example, help management establish and
communicate goals throughout the organization; review performance)
05. Financial metrics (for example, ROI, cost per hire, internal rate of return)
06. Operational metrics (for example, measures of production, service measures, customer
satisfaction)
08. Preparing metrics for different audiences (for example, providing and interpreting
information to the executive management team or to a group of employees)
© 2011 SHRM xv
Module 4: Measurement
09. Basic measurements for organizational management (for example, a set of goals and
measures that the company has established [dashboard indicators])
10. Using technology to calculate and effectively present metrics (for example, enterprise
resource planning system [ERP], desktop software, HRIS)
Behavior: 04. Establish and manage key performance indicators (for example,
outsourcing data, cost per hire, HR measurement tools
[scorecards] and trend analyses)
Skills & Knowledge: 09. Basic measurements for organizational management (for
example, a set of goals and measures that the company has
established [dashboard indicators])
Introduction
A measurement system that tracks results and informs strategic development is an
important part of any organization’s strategic planning process. Without metrics
and measurement information, it is difficult to know what has worked and what
has not worked.
© 2011 SHRM 3
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.1: Basic Measurements for Organizational
Management
Measure
The process of collecting and tabulating data
The products of measurement are numerical such as…
o headcount, cost of employee benefits, sales revenue
© 2011 SHRM 4
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.1: Basic Measurements for Organizational
Management
Metrics
A performance parameter based on two or more measures
It describes:
o Past outcomes such as turnover
o Process performance such as time and cost
o Example: revenue per employee, which is derived from total revenue
and employee headcount
Analytics
© 2011 SHRM 5
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.1: Basic Measurements for Organizational
Management
Parmenter emphasizes the crucial link between the business model and the
strategic planning cycle by summarizing a 12-step model for developing and
using KPIs as shown in Figure 1-3.
© 2011 SHRM 6
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.1: Basic Measurements for Organizational
Management
© 2011 SHRM 7
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.1: Basic Measurements for Organizational
Management
© 2011 SHRM 8
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.1: Basic Measurements for Organizational
Management
Quality Standards
International Organization for Standardization (ISO)
The main purpose of ISO is to enhance trade among countries. Using ISO
standards means that organizations can develop products and services that are
widely accepted internationally. This means that organizations using ISO
standards can compete in many more markets around the world.
© 2011 SHRM 9
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.1: Basic Measurements for Organizational
Management
Systems Theory
© 2011 SHRM 10
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.1: Basic Measurements for Organizational
Management
The total quality management philosophy varies somewhat among the three
experts who popularized the theory’s concept and strategies for achieving total
quality:
W. Edwards Deming
W. Edwards Deming was the American pioneer who took his 14-point program
for managing productivity and quality to Japan in 1950, where he found a
receptive audience. Japan’s award for excellence in quality, the Deming Prize, is
named after him.
Joseph M. Juran
Philip B. Crosby
Six Sigma
Six Sigma is a strategy that identifies and removes the causes of defects and errors
in manufacturing and business processes. This strategy originated in the 1980s
© 2011 SHRM 11
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.1: Basic Measurements for Organizational
Management
and uses data and facts to measure performance of a process or a product. Six
Sigma targets three main areas.
Improving customer satisfaction
Reducing cycle time
Reducing defects
To achieve Six Sigma, a process must not produce more than 3.4 defects per
million opportunities. A Six Sigma defect is defined as anything outside of
© 2011 SHRM 12
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.1: Basic Measurements for Organizational
Management
Lean Six Sigma is a strategy that eliminates waste and improves process flows.
Lean focuses on resource optimization through logistical coordination and
inventory minimization. The difference between Lean Six Sigma and Six Sigma is
as follows:
Lean Six Sigma is about eliminating waste, taking time out of processes
and creating better flow.
Six Sigma is a business strategy built around the concept that organizations
gain a competitive edge by reducing variations and thus defects.
Eliminating variations is a long and involved process.
To decide whether to use Lean Six Sigma or Six Sigma tools, look at the types of
business problems that need to be solved.
Lean Six Sigma tools are more appropriate if the following business problems
exist:
There seems to be a lot of waste.
There is a need to minimize inventories and redundancies.
There is a need to improve work flows.
There is a need to speed up processes.
There are human mistakes.
© 2011 SHRM 13
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.1: Basic Measurements for Organizational
Management
Six Sigma tools are more appropriate if the following business problems exist:
There are quality issues.
There is too much variation.
There are complex problems.
There are challenging root cause identifications.
There are numerous technical considerations.
Additional information on the integration of Lean Six Sigma and Six Sigma can
be found at Lean Six Sigma Black Belt Handbook, Villanova University, 2009.
© 2011 SHRM 14
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.1: Basic Measurements for Organizational
Management
Process-Flow Analysis
Cause-and-Effect Diagram
© 2011 SHRM 15
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.1: Basic Measurements for Organizational
Management
Histogram
Scatter Diagram
© 2011 SHRM 16
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.1: Basic Measurements for Organizational
Management
in Figure 1-9, data points are shown along an imaginary diagonal line. Education
level and the amount of income are rising together. The scatter diagram makes it
easy to see points or conditions that do not fall near this line.
Pareto Chart
A Pareto chart is a vertical bar graph where the bar height shows the frequency or
effect of causes. The Pareto principle, which states that 80 percent of effects come
from 20 percent of causes, is a popularization of this analysis. Figure 1-10 is an
example Pareto chart.
© 2011 SHRM 17
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.1: Basic Measurements for Organizational
Management
Gantt Chart
The Gantt chart is also known as a horizontal bar chart, a milestone chart or an
activity chart. The Gantt chart graphically displays steps in a project in order by
start date, and plots their expected duration with start and end points. Each
activity includes the amount of work required to proceed from one point in time to
another. Gantt charts are used to plan a project or to monitor the progress of a
project. Figure 1-11 shows an example of a Gantt chart.
Figure 1-12 is an example PERT chart. Tasks that must be completed in sequence
(A, B, C, E and F) are called dependent or serial tasks. The series of tasks that
take the longest time to complete are referred to as the critical path (that is, these
© 2011 SHRM 18
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.1: Basic Measurements for Organizational
Management
tasks are crucial). For the whole project to be completed on time, critical path
tasks must be completed on time. The path B-D-E is not critical because the total
number of weeks to complete it is four, compared to B-C-E, which requires seven
weeks. Task D is referred to as a parallel or concurrent task.
Benchmarking
Benchmarking is the process of measuring key performance indicators that can
be compared across organizations. Benchmarks are useful because they provide
insights about the way other organizations manage similar functions. An
organization can benchmark data for almost any aspect of its operation.
© 2011 SHRM 19
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.1: Basic Measurements for Organizational
Management
The benchmark you use must be comparable to the function or situation you are
assessing. For example, turnover can be determined differently among
organizations and among branches or subsidiaries within an organization.
Kinds of Benchmarking
HR Benchmarking
© 2011 SHRM 20
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.1: Basic Measurements for Organizational
Management
Benchmark Examples
Pay and social costs as a Turnover rate
percentage of operating expense Turnover cost
Cost per hire Time to fill jobs
Return on training investment Human value added
Health care costs per employee
Figure 1-14. HR Benchmark Examples (Society for Human Resource Management 2006)
In some situations, you will need to gather or exchange comparison data quickly.
Informal benchmarks provide a useful initial measure. For example, social
networks and Internet platforms allow people around the world to post questions
and to get answers quickly and easily. Informal benchmarks are less exact, but
they are often faster and less expensive..
Benchmarking not only compares price and characteristics but may also compare
additional factors such as how the product is designed, the development process
and how the product is distributed.
Benchmarking Limitations
© 2011 SHRM 21
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.1: Basic Measurements for Organizational
Management
Theory of Constraints
An idea related to TQM is the theory of constraints (TOC), a systems
management philosophy intended to help organizations continually achieve their
goals. TOC was developed by Eliyahu M. Goldratt and described in his book, The
Goal (Goldratt and Cox 2004). Goldratt made specific applications for TOC
solutions in the areas of operations, supply chain/logistics, finance and
accounting, project management, and marketing and sales.
Theory of constraints is based on the premise that the rate of goal achievement is
limited by at least one constraining process. By increasing the flow through the
constraint, the overall throughput can be increased.
If the constraint has been eliminated and is no longer constraining the system’s
performance, the organization repeats the TOC steps, looking for the next process
step that is constraining performance. If the constraint has not been eliminated,
the organization takes whatever action is needed to eliminate it. This may involve
major changes and financial investments.
Dashboard Indicators
Once KPIs have been determined and measured, and metrics have been derived,
the information must be presented in a timely fashion to be the most useful to the
organization. Information technology allows for a computerized dashboard.
© 2011 SHRM 22
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.1: Basic Measurements for Organizational
Management
A dashboard arranges information in a visual fashion that allows the user to view
and compare data.
© 2011 SHRM 23
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.1: Basic Measurements for Organizational
Management
Practice Questions
1. Which one of the following would not be considered a key performance indicator?
a. Percentage of HR budget spent on training
b. Organization business model
c. Percentage of customer issues resolved in the first phone call
d. Revenue per employee (or FTE)
2. Assume you are responsible for establishing and managing key performance indicators for
your organization. What would be your first step?
a. Selecting team-level performance measures
b. Developing the reporting framework at all levels
c. Marketing the KPI strategy to all employees
d. Obtaining senior management commitment
3. Which Six Sigma process would the organization use to develop a new product?
a. DMAIC
b. DMADV
c. Six Sigma Green Belts
d. Six Sigma Black Belts
4. Which one of the following tools would be best for analyzing and presenting data about
the relationship between years of education and amount of income?
a. Cause-and-effect diagram
b. Histogram
c. Gantt chart
d. Scatter diagram
© 2011 SHRM 24
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.1: Basic Measurements for Organizational
Management
5. Once KPIs have been determined and measured, and metrics have been derived, what tool
is the best for presenting the information?
a. Dashboard indicators
b. Gantt chart
c. Flow chart
d. Theory of constraints
© 2011 SHRM 25
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.1: Basic Measurements for Organizational
Management
© 2011 SHRM 26
4.2: HR Measurement and
Evaluation
Skills & Knowledge: 01. Quantitative metrics (for example, the numbers of employees lost
or gained, and recruiting statistics)
05. Financial metrics (for example, ROI, cost per hire, internal rate of
return)
Introduction
The 2009 Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) report on future
workplace trends identified the following trend related to human capital
measurement and HR metrics:
Figure 2-1. Trend in Human Capital Measurement and HR Trends (Society for Human Resource
Management 2009)
One significant trend is the continued effort to create a formal and standardized
definition of the practice of HR. This effort requires HR professionals to identify
and formalize a core group of universal HR principles and practices that are not
confined to any one nation or jurisdiction. An example of this trend is the course
material you are currently studying. Another example is SHRM’s effort to establish
an HR-specific series of ISO standards that can be applied worldwide (Society for
Human Resource Management 2011). All these efforts support the increasing
objectivity and professionalism associated with the practice of HR worldwide.
This section continues to explore the following topics related to the details of HR
measurement and evaluation:
Research terms and techniques
HR management and evaluation metrics
© 2011 SHRM 29
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
The section begins with an in-depth review of research terms and techniques.
Measurements are good only if reliable methods are used to collect and analyze
the data. The main concepts in data research and analysis are:
Inductive and deductive reasoning
Primary and secondary research
Experimental research process
Quantitative and qualitative analyses
Reliability and validity
© 2011 SHRM 30
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Inductive Reasoning
For example, an HR professional can gather data about a group of newly hired
employees who are high performers. Most of the employees also speak more than
one language. The HR professional induces that, for this job, the ability to speak
more than one language is a good indicator of future success. The success of
inductive reasoning depends on the sample size and randomness, which are
discussed later in this section. In this example, a larger sample of new hires from
different organizations could produce a different pattern of data.
Deductive Reasoning
© 2011 SHRM 31
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
For example, research at one organization shows that managers who exercise high
levels of control have workers with lower morale. An HR professional observes
that a particular manager is very controlling. The HR professional deduces that
the organization will find lower morale in this manager’s department. The success
of deductive reasoning depends on the reliability of the starting premise.
The choice to use primary or secondary research depends on the question and on
practical limitations. For example, some questions are very specific and can be
answered only by primary research. Other questions are too broad to be tested
within a confined work environment and can be answered only by secondary
research.
© 2011 SHRM 32
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Figure 2-3. Sources of Primary and Secondary Research for Evaluating HR Effectiveness
Research projects can combine primary and secondary research. For example, if
an organization wants to understand how recent technological changes have
affected supervisory managers, primary research could include the following.
Focus groups of a cross section of managers
Questionnaires sent to all managers
Observation of several managers as they perform their daily tasks
Research Process
Experimental research uses the scientific method to work with variables and
examine the results. Note that non-experimental research does not include
variables. Instead, behavior is observed, measured and analyzed. Scientific
research tries to be as objective as possible.
© 2011 SHRM 33
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
The HR professional can use the scientific method to discover the factors that
attract people to their jobs, encourage them to stay at their jobs and motivate them
to perform well at their jobs.
Five steps are included in the scientific method as indicated in Figure 2-4.
Problem analysis means carefully defining the problem you are investigating.
Example:
Sales figures are decreasing for all stores at a large organization. Employees
receive no sales training during this financial crisis. The HR professional should
conduct a brief internal survey to collect data from employees regarding why they
think sales figures are decreasing.
The HR professional makes the following testable hypothesis. After one year,
sales will increase more in stores where sales training is provided compared to
stores where sales training is not provided.
© 2011 SHRM 34
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Data consists of unanalyzed facts and figures. This data becomes information
when it is placed into a useful context (as with scientific research). Data may be
qualitative or quantitative. The difference between qualitative data and
quantitative data is discussed below.
Example:
After one year, the sales turnover of both groups of stores is measured and
compared.
The success of data analysis depends on the effort put into the first four steps.
Data analysis may be qualitative or quantitative. The difference between
qualitative data analysis and quantitative data analysis is discussed below.
Example:
Data analysis shows that after one year, Group 1--the group of stores with
sales training--has better sales turnover.
This brief internal survey helped HR promote more sales training for
Group 2. The survey also helped HR develop a sales training philosophy
for the entire organization.
© 2011 SHRM 35
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Quantitative Analysis
Descriptive Statistics
Descriptive statistics condense and summarize large amounts of data for quick
understanding.
Charts and graphs
Frequency distributions and table
Measures of central tendency
Measures of variation
Measures of association
© 2011 SHRM 36
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Showing data on a chart or graph lets the researcher see the distribution of the
data. Examples include pie charts, bar charts and graphs. Figure 2-5 shows a pie
chart.
The histogram is a type of bar chart that was described in more detail in Section
4.1: Basic Measurements for Organizational Management.
© 2011 SHRM 37
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Salaries Number of
People
55,000 2
60,000 1
65,000 2
70,000 5
75,000 1
Example:
Look at the data shown in Figure 2-8. There are 15 scores for a total of 155
points.
© 2011 SHRM 38
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
The mean is the most common measure of central tendency. The mean is
calculated by adding all the data values and then dividing by the number of
values. The calculation in Figure 2-8 shows a mean of 10.33 based on the data in
Figure 2-9.
Figure 2-10 shows a graphical representation of the mean, median and mode for a
positively skewed distribution. In this distribution, most of the data values are at
the lower (left) end of the scale.
© 2011 SHRM 39
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Figure 2-11 shows the salary data for unweighted and weighted average figures.
The unweighted average is 65,000 (325,000 divided by five average salaries
provided by the organization). The weighted average is 65,909 (725,000 divided
by 11 salaries).
© 2011 SHRM 40
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
2 55,000 110,000
1 60,000 60,000
2 65,000 130,000
5 70,000 350,000
1 75,000 75,000
Figure 2-11. Salary Data for Unweighted and Weighted Average Figures
The mean is simple to calculate. However, problems can occur if there are very
few data values. For example, an organization provided a training program that
was rated by only five employees. If four employees rated the training program as
1 (indicating poor) and one rated it as 10 (excellent), the mean rating would be
2.8. This is not the best measure of the perception of the training. In this case, the
mode, or the value that occurs most frequently, gives more information. In our
example, four out of the five data values are 1, indicating that most employees did
not find the training effective.
Another problem occurs with a large number of data points that include extreme
scores. For example, an organization provided a training program that was rated
by 500 employees. Most of the employees rated the program as 7 on a 10-point
scale. However, some of the ratings were very high and a few ratings were very
low. In this case, the median is the most useful. The median is the score that lies
directly in the middle of the values. To find the median, the data are listed in order
like the ascending order shown in Figure 2-9. The total number of data points are
counted (500) and then divided by two. The median is between data values 250
and 251 and is close to a rating of 7.
© 2011 SHRM 41
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Quartiles and percentiles are also used to measure central tendencies. Quartiles
and percentiles show how groups of data related to each other (also called
dispersion). Organizations use quartiles and percentiles to determine whether they
lead, lag or match the external market. For example, Figure 2-12 shows the range
for one job grade as reported in a salary survey.
Measures of Variation
Measures of variation show how much the data differ from the central tendency
values. In our training example above, employees’ rating of the training program
show a large variation, with some very high rating and some very low ratings.
This variation could indicate that some employees were insufficiently prepared
for the training. Measures of variation include:
Range is the distance between the highest and lowest scores. The range is
calculated as the highest score minus the lowest score.
Example:
The data 10, 11, 12, 68, 69 and 70 yield a range of 60 (70 minus 10).
© 2011 SHRM 42
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Figure 2-13. A large standard deviation tells you that the data are diverse,
while a small standard deviation tells you that the data are close together.
HR professionals frequently use standard deviations to show performance
rating distributions. Mathematically, for a normal distribution, one
standard deviation (or sigma) is defined as the range for which 68.2 percent
of the data are contained in the limits defined by the mean plus or minus
one sigma.
Measures of Association
Measures of association show how two or more factors (variables) are related. For
example, income can be related to education level and amount of air pollution can
be related to the incidences of respiratory disease.
© 2011 SHRM 43
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
A causal relationship exists when two variables are related in some way.
Three conditions must be met in a causal relationship:
o Evidence of association must exist.
o The dependent variable must change in a consistent way after the
independent variable changes.
o All other possible causes must be eliminated.
Inferential Statistics
© 2011 SHRM 44
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Population
Normal Distribution
The normal distribution is the distribution you expect to see after conducting a
random sampling across a large population. When you use inferential statistics,
you assume that the sample and the population under examination conform to the
characteristics of a normal distribution, as shown in Figure 2-13.
© 2011 SHRM 45
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Qualitative Analysis
Qualitative research can take many forms. A typical example is an interview with
individuals or groups. Some benefits and cautions related to common qualitative
research tools are described below.
© 2011 SHRM 46
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Rating scales provide fixed quantitative responses. For example, participants are
asked to read a series of statements and indicate their degree of agreement with
one representing strong disagreement and five representing strong agreement.
Rating scales may consist of an odd or even number range. A scale of 1 to 5
allows participants to choose a centered response (3). A scale of 1 to 6 does not
contain a center value and forces participants to choose a value in the lower range
(1, 2 or 3) or the higher range (4, 5 or 6).
Rating scales are easy for participants to answer when the directions are clear.
These scales are sometimes combined with qualitative information. Qualitative
information may be obtained through open-ended questions that encourage
descriptive written responses rather than specific ratings.
Figure 2-16 lists the benefits and risks of surveys and questionnaires.
© 2011 SHRM 47
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
When you collect personal data as part of a qualitative analysis, be aware of the
laws concerning data privacy in your country.
© 2011 SHRM 48
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
For example, a measure is considered reliable if a person's score on the same test
given twice is similar.
Parallel Forms
This method uses two assessments that are identical except for the test questions.
For example, a pre-test and a post-test can be considered parallel forms if they are
designed correctly. After both tests are completed, the two scores are correlated.
Test/Retest
This approach measures the consistency of test scores over time. Participants take
the same test at two different times. After both tests are completed, the scores for
each individual are correlated.
Internal Consistency
Internal consistency tells you how well a test or procedure assesses the same
characteristic, skill or quality. For example, a test is divided into two equivalent
parts. The same person takes both parts of the test, the results of which are then
correlated. For there to be internal consistency, the results should be the same or
very similar.
© 2011 SHRM 49
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Rater Agreement
Training helps clarify the rules for rating and improves reliability among raters.
―Measurement starts with the belief that we can and should evaluate our work in
both qualitative and quantitative terms. Without some type of objective review, it
is very difficult to improve performance.‖ (Fitz-enz and Davison 2002)
© 2011 SHRM 50
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
You may notice that some of the metrics listed in Figure 2-17, and in other lists
of metrics used here and from other sources may not be appropriate for your
organization’s strategy, location or culture. Formulas vary. Be sure to use a
consistent formula in your organization and when benchmarking.
© 2011 SHRM 51
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
© 2011 SHRM 52
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
© 2011 SHRM 53
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
© 2011 SHRM 54
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
See Section 3.4: Employee Benefit Program and Compensation Plan Service
Delivery for more information on compensation (remuneration).
Benefits
Figure 2-19 describes some frequently used benefit metrics and how they are used.
See Section 3.4: Employee Benefit Program and Compensation Plan Service
Delivery for more information on benefits.
Figure 2-20 describes some frequently used human resource development (HRD)
metrics and how they are used.
© 2011 SHRM 55
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Employee Relations
Figure 2-21 describes some frequently used employee relations metrics and how
they are used.
© 2011 SHRM 56
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
© 2011 SHRM 57
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
There are many published lists and approaches to the identification, measurement
and analysis of HR metrics. Below are some references to consult for more
information:
How to Measure Human Resources Management by Jac Fitz-enz and
Barbara Davison (Fitz-enz and Davison 2002)
HR Metrics the World-Class Way by John Sullivan (Sullivan 2002)
© 2011 SHRM 58
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Financial Metrics
HR professionals can use the following four financial metrics to evaluate HR’s
strategic contributions.
Return on investment (ROI)
Cost-benefit analysis
Break-even analysis
Financial statement analysis
Return on Investment
© 2011 SHRM 59
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Example:
An organization lost 100 employees last year, at a cost of 10,000 each, for a total
of 1,000,000. With a new program that will require a one-time investment of
300,000, you can reduce turnover by 50 percent. This will mean a savings of
500,000. The net savings the first year will be 200,000. The net return on
investment of this program for the first year would be 66.6 percent.
It is sometimes difficult to identify the full value of the benefits received and the
cost to produce the benefit. ROI calculations require HR professionals to:
Establish clear objectives.
Define achievements in a measurable way that can be translated into a
monetary value.
Gather data carefully.
With these actions, ROI is one of the most effective ways for HR to evaluate the
strategic impact of initiatives.
© 2011 SHRM 60
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Cost-Benefit Analysis
The cost-benefit analysis (CBA) presents data as a ratio. CBA and ROI differ
because CBA involves both tangible and intangible costs and benefits.
Management uses this analysis to measure how programs impact the
organization’s profitability.
© 2011 SHRM 61
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Example:
A new HR program will result in total savings of 10,000. The cost of the program
will be 2,000. The cost-benefit ratio is calculated as follows:
The cost-benefit analysis process for the entire HR function includes the
following steps:
Break-Even Analysis
© 2011 SHRM 62
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
To calculate the break-even point, divide the total cost by the total revenue.
Example
© 2011 SHRM 63
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
More information regarding financial analysis can be found in Section 1.7: The
Sustainable HR Budget.
Performance Metrics
HR professionals should focus on measuring results rather than activities. An
example of an activity is establishing a dispute resolution training program for
managers. An example of a result that can be measured is the number of
employees retained as a result of a change in dispute resolution. HR can
collaborate with internal stakeholders to select significant measurement points.
This collaboration will have two effects:
Ensure that efforts are being directed at strategically significant
improvements.
Build understanding of the process and its value which is essential for
cooperation in data gathering.
© 2011 SHRM 64
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
The steps for implementing the balanced scorecard system are similar to the steps
followed in strategic planning.
Step 1: Plan the Process
To plan the process, HR professionals must:
o Confirm the scope of the project and establish a project timeline.
o Outline a project communication approach.
o Determine organizational participation and roles.
o Confirm expected project deliverables.
Goals must be in place before the scorecard is used. If possible, recruit a
person from top-level management to provide sponsorship and visibility to
the process.
Step 2: Design the Scorecard
To design the scorecard, HR professionals must:
o Focus on measures that actively support the organization’s strategy.
o Identify key success factors.
o Develop an action plan.
© 2011 SHRM 65
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Performance Audits
You can use HR audit tools such as checklists to indicate what items should be
included in any HR audit. The HR audit tool should allow HR professionals to
assign a numerical value to an assessment. This numerical value shows how
effectively the organization has put basic HR activities in place and how well
these HR activities are being performed. Either HR staff or a third-party
contractor can conduct an audit. The benefit of using an outside source is that they
can be more objective in their evaluation than internal staff.
© 2011 SHRM 66
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Before starting an audit, make sure that you have agreement to fix any legal
compliance problem you may discover as part of the audit. If you learn about a
problem and then ignore it, you might increase your organization’s liability.
© 2011 SHRM 67
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Supply Analysis
Supply analysis Supply data is one type of workforce planning data. Supply
analysis considers the varieties of skills in an organization as it
exists now and projects future needs based on anticipated
business growth or retention. Historical attrition is considered
when forecasting future supply.
Accurate supply forecasts account for movement into and inside the organization
(new hires, promotions and transfers) and out of the organization (resignations,
layoffs, retirements and discharges).
© 2011 SHRM 68
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
For these reasons, HR professionals use tools such as trend and ratio analysis,
employee turnover analysis and flow analysis.
Demand Analysis
Demand analysis Demand data is one type of workforce planning data. Demand
analysis considers the model organization of the future and its
human capital needs. Demand is often measured in terms of
estimated growth, need for new skills, and the location and
number of new positions.
Demand analysis considers the model organization of the future and its human
capital needs. Once the supply model is developed, data can be compared to the
demand analysis projections and discrepancies can be identified, including
insufficient or surplus numbers of employees and skills deficiencies. Various
techniques may be used in demand analysis to project the number of employees
and the skills required to meet future organizational goals.
Trend and ratio analysis uses statistics to determine whether relationships exist
between two variables. To forecast human capital needs, look for variables
related to the business that appear to change predictably over time. Thus, review
past performance to forecast the future.
Trends and ratios are calculated separately but can be interrelated. Consider this
example:
The end result is an estimate of the number of employees required in the
organization’s workforce.
© 2011 SHRM 69
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
The trends used are annual sales and labor productivity (see Figure 2-29).
There is performance data for the last six years. Using statistical analysis
variables, the trend analysis estimates the number of employees needed for
the next two years (see Figure 2-30).
The ratio analysis considers assumptions for changes in amount of sales or
the productivity per employee.
Ratio analysis uses estimates that reflect future changes to the performance data.
For example, assume that labor productivity remains the same at 12,520 per
employee, but sales are predicted to increase to five million in year seven. Figure
2-31 illustrates this calculation and how the estimate changes.
© 2011 SHRM 70
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Now assume that because of new efficiencies created by better equipment and
employee training, labor productivity will increase to 13,000 during year seven.
Figure 2-32 illustrates how the estimated number of employees needed changes
with this additional assumption.
© 2011 SHRM 71
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Figure 2-32. Ratio Analysis with Projected Increase in Sales and Labor Productivity
The ability to predict variables such as level of sales, production or service within
workable limits or ranges usually becomes the foundation for making the HR
forecast. It is crucial that HR leaders understand how the organization plans to
change and grow, as well as other variables that influence human capital
requirements so that they can participate effectively in strategic planning. When
trend and ratio analyses figures are projected into the future, the key determinant
is whether relationships between the variables will remain the same or change.
Therefore, it is essential to understand the assumptions underlying the forecast so
that it can be adapted if variables change.
© 2011 SHRM 72
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Total 65 2,704
© 2011 SHRM 73
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Flow Analysis
Flow analysis forecasts how employees move between organizational units, into
the organization and out of the organization. Flow analyses allow HR leaders and
planners to visualize the personnel changes and forecast future staffing needs for
discrete portions of the organization (department, division or function). Thus, the
technique requires the HR planner to separate employees by levels, occupational
groupings and organizational units.
© 2011 SHRM 74
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Judgmental Forecasts
Judgmental forecasts use information from the past and present to predict
expected future conditions. These forecasts utilize information provided by
individuals associated with the industry to project future industry needs.
© 2011 SHRM 75
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Statistical Forecasts
© 2011 SHRM 76
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Cultural Considerations
As HR professionals collect and utilize data to arrive at specific metrics and
organizational measures, it may be necessary to consider the need for local
differentiation in data collection and the possible impact cultural differences may
have on results from specific locations.
© 2011 SHRM 77
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Note that the terms employee engagement, commitment, opinions and attitudes
are frequently used interchangeably when referring to employee surveys.
© 2011 SHRM 78
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Employee Surveys
An employee survey is a measurement tool used to assess employee perceptions
about the work environment. Employee surveys provide formal documentation on
important organizational issues.
Survey Benefits
Survey Topics
Employee surveys can be used to collect data on a wide variety of topics such as:
Quality of management
Organizational business strategy and direction, creativity, innovation, etc.
Quality of work/life issues
Employee morale and job engagement
Customer focus
Effectiveness of compensation (remuneration) and benefit programs
Perceptions of HR effectiveness
Employee development opportunities
Employee retention and attrition issues
© 2011 SHRM 79
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Survey Design
Online Surveys
© 2011 SHRM 80
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Special Considerations
Survey Analysis
Specific topics will vary depending on the purpose of the focus group. For
example, a focus group gives employees an opportunity to express opinions on:
How to best redesign a company’s product
New corporate strategies
Proposed changes to an employee benefits plan
Focus groups serve a variety of purposes for HR and are often used following a
survey. Focus groups can provide more detailed information about specific issues
raised during a survey. Focus groups can collect qualitative data that supplements
quantitative survey results. However, focus groups may also be used
independently from a survey to determine employees’ opinions about a specific
program or issue such as a major reorganization or change.
© 2011 SHRM 81
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Special Considerations
© 2011 SHRM 82
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Focus groups can be an effective technique for gathering employee feedback. Yet,
focus groups also have some distinct disadvantages.
Statistics are useful for translating quantitative and qualitative data into
understandable information. The use of both qualitative and quantitative data in a
report often provides the most complete picture.
Listed below are some common errors in interpreting data and how to avoid them.
Drawing conclusions too early. It is easy to draw preliminary conclusions
from incomplete data and then continue to select subsequent data that
supports these conclusions. As an analysis points to conclusions, less
attention may be given to factors that if explored further might be
significant. Try to refrain from drawing conclusions early in the analysis.
© 2011 SHRM 83
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
More information about data analysis and presentation can be found earlier in this
section and in Section 4.1: Basic Measurements for Organizational
Management.
The data collected in an employee survey and/or focus group describes an existing
situation which can then be compared with the desired situation. The ideal result
of survey and focus group feedback is that changes will occur.
© 2011 SHRM 84
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
In addition, addressing the issues that are identified in surveys or focus groups is
important. If an organization goes through the process of doing a survey but does
not act on the result, it may influence how people respond to subsequent surveys.
Organizations should be clear about the actions they are taking, and the linkage
between the actions and the survey results.
© 2011 SHRM 85
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
Practice Questions
1. When using an assessment tool, it is important that the tool has validity. Validity refers to
the fact that
a. the assessment measures what it is supposed to measure.
b. the same results are demonstrated over time.
c. the results are based on more than one interviewer.
d. the reviewers reach the same conclusions.
2. A company requires job applicants applying for a position in their distribution center to
take a lifting test. Test results are consistent, and the test measures what it is intended to
measure. This test is considered
a. reliable.
b. valid.
c. neither reliable nor valid.
d. both reliable and valid.
3 5 5 5 6 7 7 8 8
© 2011 SHRM 86
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
6. Which measure of variation shows how scores are spread out from the mean?
a. Range
b. Percentile
c. Standard deviation
d. Mode
© 2011 SHRM 87
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
11. Which of the following measures of central tendency refers to the value that occurs most
frequently in a distribution?
a. Mode
b. Median
c. Mean
d. Range
12. Which measure of association measures the relationship between two variables?
a. Range
b. Regression
c. Correlation
d. Deviation
© 2011 SHRM 88
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
© 2011 SHRM 89
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.2: HR Measurement and Evaluation
© 2011 SHRM 90
4.3: Establish and
Administer a Performance
Management System
This section covers the following information from the
Knowledge Base:
Skill & Knowledge: 08 Preparing metrics for different audiences (for example, providing
and interpreting information to the executive management team
or to a group of employees)
Introduction
In his book Human Resource Management, Gary Dessler defines performance
management as follows (Dessler 2008):
© 2011 SHRM 93
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.3: Establish and Administer a
Performance Management System
Values
© 2011 SHRM 94
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.3: Establish and Administer a
Performance Management System
Goals
Management must also be specific about the organization’s long- and short-term
goals. Goals are standards that reflect an organization’s success. By comparing
organizational goals with achievement levels, management knows whether an
organization is making the desired progress.
© 2011 SHRM 95
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.3: Establish and Administer a
Performance Management System
Design
During the design phase of the performance management process, the following
important questions are answered:
Who will evaluate?
When will evaluations be completed?
What criteria will be used?
What input will be incorporated?
© 2011 SHRM 96
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.3: Establish and Administer a
Performance Management System
Implementation
© 2011 SHRM 97
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.3: Establish and Administer a
Performance Management System
Evaluation
The evaluation phase involves identifying and evaluating the effectiveness of the
performance management process. The following outcomes are evaluated:
Overall alignment with the organization’s culture and objectives
Fairness to employees
Extent to which it supports the organization’s recognition and reward
system
http://harvard.wsi.com.cn/sumtotal/stdata/20081126_154302_4721/make_pe
rformance_measurement_part_of_your_job.html
Business results influence the goals and strategy of the organization. As business
goals and strategies change, the performance management system will need to be
adapted. Business results provide value to stakeholders and may affect:
Financial results
Quality
Customer products or services
© 2011 SHRM 98
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.3: Establish and Administer a
Performance Management System
Employee Growth. The employee brings certain knowledge and skills to the job
but will also grow professionally through experience, performance improvement
plans and organizational support. The performance management system should
include fair and meaningful recognition and rewards. Employee engagement
surveys have shown that employees do value financial rewards, but the following
performance incentives are essential to keeping employees in an organization:
Appreciation/recognition
Career growth opportunities
Good manager relationships
Organizational Support
There are several ways an organization can support and enhance its performance
management system:
Demonstrate support of performance management at the executive level.
Encourage and promote activities that result in improved employee
engagement.
Train managers in various aspects of performance management.
Hold managers accountable for their contributions to the performance
management system.
Encourage continual feedback from managers, peers and other team
members.
Ensure that everyone in the organization understands that performance
management is a management tool that is applied through an ongoing
process rather than a yearly appraisal.
Ensure that managers understand potential ramifications of not adequately
documenting and communicating standards of performance.
Provide the necessary resources and tools.
Communicate consistent management practices.
Follow the process as communicated throughout the organization.
© 2011 SHRM 99
Module 4: Measurement Section 4.3: Establish and Administer a
Performance Management System
Development goals should always align with the organization’s needs. For
example, if an employee who works for a financial management firm would like
to move into movie production, the manager should not incorporate this into
development goals.
The cascading goals process is easily understood through the example in Figure 3-
4 below that illustrates the correlation of the organization’s five-year and annual
plans to a global staffing manager’s annual individual performance goals.
Observation
Managers and employees should have frequent interaction with feedback and
coaching throughout the period covered by the evaluation process. Feedback and
coaching should be ongoing and consistent to support the success of both the
employee and the organization.
A formal evaluation typically takes place at the end of a defined period such as a
year. The formal evaluation often involves input from the manager and others
with whom the employee has had substantial interaction (manager assessment),
and the employee (employee self-assessment).
Manager Assessment
Throughout the period of the evaluation, the manager should do the following:
Provide ongoing feedback to the employee, including a review of successes
and obstacles, with coaching as needed.
Provide the necessary support to help the employee reach his or her
objectives including tools, training, coaching and participation in special
assignments.
Document information such as key accomplishments, issues and
communication with the employee.
Just prior to the formal evaluation process, the manager should review
information collected over the course of the reporting period and obtain feedback
from key stakeholders including internal and external clients, peers and partners,
as appropriate. If the employee is a manager, it is important to obtain feedback
from all subordinates. Feedback from clients, peers and partners is sometimes
called 360-degree feedback.
any legal action is taken by the employee. Particularly when there are
performance issues, managers should document the issues and key discussion
points with the employee. Managers should also document relevant conversations
in an e-mail or memo to the employee that outlines what was discussed.
Employee Self-Assessment
Evaluation Methods
Category rating methods are the easiest to administer and understand. The
manager selects an employee’s performance level on a designated form that is
divided into performance categories. The following are three category rating
method examples.
Graphic scale: This method uses a five-point scale with ratings ranging
from ―exceptional‖ to ―needs improvement‖.
Checklist: Check marks are placed next to characteristics describing
employee performance.
Forced choice: Check marks are placed by two of four statements from a
combination of positive and negative statements describing what the
employee is most like and least like.
Behaviorally anchored rating scale (BARS): The behaviorally anchored
rating scale (BARS) method enhances the category rating. The manager
describes the employee’s behavior associated with each performance level.
BARS works best in situations where many employees are performing the
same tasks. This method requires a lot of time and energy to develop and
maintain. In addition, different BARS must be developed to measure
employee performance for different jobs. (Dessler 2008)
Comparative Methods
No appraisal rating method is foolproof. Figure 3-5 lists some common errors
when managers are conducting an appraisal of employees and assigning a rating.
Error Description
Recency The recency error occurs when a manager gives more weight to
recent performance and ignores the employee’s earlier
performance during the appraisal period. This may happen for the
following reasons.
The manager is unable to remember the employee’s
performance from eight or 12 months ago.
Many employees may improve their performance just before
their performance review occurs.
Error Description
Primacy The primacy effect occurs when a manager gives more weight to
the employee’s earlier performance and ignores recent
performance. This may occur when individuals tend to pay more
attention at first and then lose attention.
Leniency Leniency errors are the result of managers who don’t want to give
low scores, so they give all employees high scores. If an employee
is discharged after receiving such an evaluation, the appraisal may
contradict the reason for the discharge; therefore, this type of
evaluation can cause discontent among employees and litigation.
In addition, employees who have not received clear, honest
feedback have limited opportunity for improvement and future
success.
Central tendency Central tendency errors occur when a manager rates all
employees within the same range regardless of the differences in
actual performance.
Error Description
As mentioned earlier, feedback should be given often, not just at the end of a
reporting period. The guidelines in Figure 3-6 are helpful for managers when
giving performance feedback.
Feedback Guidelines
Do Do Not
Do choose a time and place that allows for Don’t focus on a specific event.
privacy and lack of interruptions. (Instead, review the entire
Do give employees a chance to comment evaluation period.)
on their own performance (both objectives Don’t focus only on the negative.
achieved and areas for improvement). Don’t focus on personality issues
Do focus first on strengths and then talk or traits that are not related to job
about areas for improvement. performance.
Do be specific, not general. (Support Don’t do all the talking.
feedback with factual information.)
Do focus on job behaviors, not the person.
To finalize the formal appraisal process, the employee and manager should reach
agreement on the appraisal ratings. When this is not possible, the manager should
document that the appraisal was shared with the employee and that agreement
could not be reached. Ensuring ongoing dialogue and feedback throughout the
reporting period will mitigate this possibility.
In addition, the manager and the employee should discuss the employee's
development and outline some potential development goals for the following
performance period, which will be finalized during the goal-setting phase.
After review of the employee’s performance, the manager and the employee work
together to create a performance improvement plan that will help the employee
meet organizational, departmental and individual goals.
Documentation
An IDP is linked to an employee’s career goals and the needs of the organization
and focuses on the following:
The employee’s skills and talents for future jobs
New skills that will help the employee perform better on the job
Employees who are involved in a career development process are more likely to
stay with the organization. Working together, a manager and an employee can
create a plan to meet the goals of both the employee and the organization. It is
very important that these goals are regularly monitored, and that the organization
supports the employee to enable him or her achieve these development plans.
Practice Questions
2. In most organizations, the performance management process includes three phases. Which
of the following is not a phase of the performance management process?
a. Analysis
b. Design
c. Implementation
d. Evaluation
3. What are career growth opportunities, recognition and good manager relationships?
a. Goals
b. Values
c. Performance incentives
d. Performance standards
4. What is the process that measures whether an employee accomplishes work requirements?
a. Performance values
b. Performance standards
c. Performance management
d. Performance appraisal
5. Which appraisal method evaluates performance using self, peers, direct reports,
management, and sometimes customers and suppliers?
a. Category rating
b. 360-degree feedback
c. Management by objectives
d. Behaviorally-anchored rating scale (BARS)
7. What plays an important role in the overall fairness of the performance evaluation system?
a. Good documentation
b. Goal setting
c. Employee’s self-assessment
d. Performance appraisal errors
1. b (p. 95)
2. a (p. 96)
3. c (p. 99)
4. d (p. 100)
5. b (p. 106)
6. d (p. 109)
7. a (p. 113)
Skills & Knowledge: 10. Using technology to calculate and effectively present metrics (for
example, enterprise resource planning system [ERP], desktop
software, HRIS)
Introduction
The role of human resources (HR) is constantly changing due to advances in
technology and computer software tools that are dramatically transforming the
practice of human resource management (HRM). Many organizations deliver HR
services using technology and web-based applications. This practice is commonly
referred to as e-HR. Research shows that organizations that implement HR
technology tools are more efficient than those that do not. HR professionals need
the ability to deliver HR services using technology in addition to mastering
traditional HR skills and knowledge (Johnson and Gueutal 2011).
For more information about using technology for HR service delivery, see
Module 3: HR Service Delivery. Note that some content from Module 3 is also
presented here for review and context to using technology for HR measurement.
Technological Factors
The ability of HR to collect, measure and analyze data is affected by several
factors. For some organizations, the most notable factor relates to the level of
access to technology for each location.
Digital divide The gap between individuals with and without access to
technology.
The world has become increasingly dependent on technology and the Internet. As
a result, a digital divide has emerged between those organizations and economies
with access to technology and those without access. For example, this gap can
impede the collecting and sharing of information in organizations with
subsidiaries that operate in regions or communities without high-speed Internet
access.
There are many variations of technology for organizations that fit between these
two extremes (Johnson and Gueutal 2011).
Technology Integration
HR leaders should carefully analyze and determine their HR measurement,
metrics, and analytic needs and align them with organizational strategy before
making implementation decisions (Towers Watson 2010). While new
technologies can potentially save organizations time and money, implementation
of these new technologies may be met with resistance. For example, employees
More information about ERP systems can be easily found by searching the
Internet.
Applications of HRIS
Strategic Management
HRIS skill banks and skill tracking systems can be robust tools for determining
where strengths and gaps exist in the workforce. These systems often contain a
complete database of employee records, which include the specific qualifications
of each employee, and that can then be mapped to the knowledge, skills or
abilities that an organization needs now or in the future. This area (also known as
workforce analytics) can help to inform HR development and recruitment
strategies.
An HRIS can be used to track and measure employee remuneration and benefits
to confirm that the organization is appropriately benchmarked against other
similar organizations and to ensure internal equity. This is a significant factor in
employee attraction and retention.
In the area of employee and labor relations, an HRIS may be used to track and
measure items such as:
Instances of employee discipline issues
Labor distribution data
Union service data
Employee opinion or engagement survey results
Progress on compliance efforts
Risk Management
Practice Questions
1. When considering technology for the purpose of measurement, metrics and analytics,
which one of the following is not important?
a. The period of a performance evaluation
b. The technological requirements and effects
c. How the technological requirements are different for each stakeholder or critical
user
d. How new technologies effect existing technologies inside and outside HR
2. What type of technology would you implement if your organization needed to integrate
functions and data for customer relationship management, manufacturing resource
planning, finance, supply chain and human resources?
a. Ad hoc reporting system
b. Application service providers (ASPs)
c. Enterprise resource planning (ERP) system
d. Human resource information system (HRIS)
Index
absence rate ............................................... 53 compensation ratio .................................... 54
benefit costs as a percentage of total payroll CVP ............. See customer value proposition
............................................................... 55
dashboard .................................... 22–23, 126
benefits 4, 10, 46–48, 55, 60–61, 79, 81, 127
metrics ..................................................... 5 data ... 3–4, 12, 14, 16–17, 19, 21, 30–43, 48,
60–61, 64, 66–70, 73–74, 77–79, 81, 83–
break-even analysis ............................. 59, 62 85, 121–122, 124–127
analysis ...................................... 35, 48, 84
break-even point capturing, analyzing and presenting ...... 14
sample calculation ................................. 63 collection ................... 35, 48, 78, 122, 127
cash flow projection ..See financial statement deductive reasoning ................ 30–32, 30–32
analysis
delphi technique ........................................ 76
cause-and-effect diagram .............. 15, 14–16 process ................................................... 76
compensation ...... 4, 33, 54, 78–79, 127–128 Dessler, Gary..................................... 93, 100
metrics ................................................... 54
employee engagement ............. 30, 78, 85, 99 Gantt chart ........................................... 14, 18
measurement of ..................................... 78
Goldratt, Eliyahu M. ................................. 22
employee focus groups
advantages and disadvantages of ........... 83 health care costs per employee ................. 53
special considerations ............................ 82
health care expense per employee............. 55
employee surveys .......................... 78–80, 84
histogram................................................... 16
employee turnover analysis........... 67, 69, 72
HR expense factor ..................................... 53
enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems
............................................. 121, 124–125 HRD ......... See human resource development
ERP .See enterprise resource planning (ERP) HRIS ......... See human resource information
system systems
errors in performance appraisals ....... 109–11 human capital return on investment (ROI) 53
PERT chart ........ See program evaluation and research ....................................... 20–21, 121
review technique (PERT) chart primary .................................................. 32
process ................................................... 33
population ........................................... 44–45 secondary ............................................... 32
standards ............... 9, 20, 29, 95–96, 99, 110 turnover costs ............................................ 53