A Study On Performance Appraisal (Field Work)
A Study On Performance Appraisal (Field Work)
on
“A Study on Performance Appraisal”
At
Thermax Limited
By
Mayuri Mohan Darekar
Under the Guidance of
Ms. Misba Kadri
Submitted to
1
INDEX
1 Introduction 3-5
6 Findings 28-31
7 Suggestions 32-34
8 Conclusion 35-36
2
Introduction
3
Introduction
4
The primary data required for the study were collected through structured
questionnaire, personal interviews and informal talks. The second data was
from the company manuals and the website of the company. The data were
analysed and the findings were arrived at the basis of which suggestions are
made.
Relevance & Scope of the Study
The study covers of Thermax Limited. A survey was conducted for information
about the performance appraisal system that was used in the company. The
study focuses on type, effectiveness and employee attitude of the appraisal
system to help management plan future development and growth.
Objectives of the Study
➢ Identification of the technique of performance appraisal in Devon foods.
➢ Employee attitude towards the present appraisal system. To identify the
effectiveness of performance appraisal system for employees.
➢ Identifying performance appraisal leading to the discovery of unfound
talents amongst the employees.
➢ To provide suggestions and recommendations to improve the performance
appraisal effectiveness.
5
2- Company Profile
6
Company Profile
7
Heritage:
Aeons ago, man discovered the might of fire and the power of steam, which
produced mechanical movement and rewrote the history of human civilisation.
Thermax came into being by harnessing the power of steam, produced by
boilers. Thus, the business was born in 1966. It was also the year A. S. Bhathena
collaborated with a Belgian company, Wanson, to commence business operation
as Wanson India Ltd., manufacturing small boilers at a unit in Dadar, Mumbai.
The company was renamed Thermax Limited in 1980.
Under the astute stewardship of our Late Chairman R. D. Aga, Thermax moved
into a bigger orbit, leading to its present status. The journey from Vaporax and
Thermopac – products from the early years, to the current stable of products;
from bagging our first export order to establishing a presence in the overseas
markets, has been an arduous one.
The cornerstones to building up the current-day organisation were a focus on
quality, meeting demands of customers and adhering to internationally
accepted standards.
8
3- Theoretical Background
9
Theoretical Background
10
5. Justice Theory:
Equity theory, proposed by Adams, and organizational justice theory examine
employees' perceptions of fairness in the workplace. This includes distributive
justice (fairness of outcomes), procedural justice (fairness of the process), and
interactional justice (fairness of interpersonal treatment). Exploring
employees' perceptions of fairness in the performance appraisal process can
help identify areas for improvement and enhance overall satisfaction and
engagement.
6. Attribution Theory:
Attribution theory explores how individuals interpret and attribute causality
for events, including performance outcomes. Understanding how employees
attribute their performance appraisal ratings (e.g., to their own efforts, external
factors, or bias) can provide insights into their reactions and subsequent
behaviour.
11
4-Resarch Methodology
12
Research Methodology
Primary Data:
An instrument is used to collect the required information from the employees
and also interact with the employees personally.
Primary data helps us in making observations of employee’s behaviours, talk
gestures which helped me in the identifying any the attitude of employees
towards the training program and the effectiveness of the training program in
the organization.
13
Secondary Data:
It was collected from the website of the company, the company personnel,
certain reports from the HR department. The research also took the help of
books and journals.
The most appropriate research design for the study is the descriptive research
design.gn for the study is the descriptive research design.
Research Design:
Research design is purely and simply the fame work plan for a study that guides
the collection and analysis of a data. In this study for researcher has adopted
descriptive research design.
Descriptive Research Design:
It includes surveys and fact finding enquires of different kinds.it simply
describes something such as a demographic of employees. It deals with
description of the state of offers as it is and the researcher have no influence on
the respondents.
Sampling:
It is the process of selecting representative subset of a total population for
obtaining data for the study of the whole population the subset is known as
sample. The sample size is selected for the study is 45 employees. The
techniques of sampling unit in this study are convenience sampling and the total
strength of the organization is 100 employees.
Sampling techniques:
Simple random sampling
Statistical tool used:
A simple percentage analysis.
For calculation of the simple percentage the following formula used.
Percentage of the respondents-No. of respondents / Total respondents*
Total Strength-100, Sample Size-45
14
Questionnaire:
The questionnaire is prepared in such a way that is correct the comprehensive
objectives of the study. open end, multiple choice of questionnaire adopted in
this research.
Data Collection:
Data collection is one of the most important aspects of research of any project
accurate data is very important and necessary. The information collected
through research methodology must be accurate and relevant.
15
5- Analysis (Graphs and Tables)
16
1) In your opinion performance Appraisal is?
A) Evaluation of Employees
B) Promotion of Employees
C) Job Satisfaction of Employees
D) Motivation
Motivation 3 7%
20
15
17
Interpretation-
Maximum number of employees thinks performance appraisals merely to do
with their promotion. 33% of the evaluation of employees said is performance
appraisal in my opinion. And 44% of the promotion of employees is said is to
the performance appraisal in my opinion. 16% of job satisfaction of employees
and 7% motivation is said to the performance appraisal in my opinion.
18
2) Which method of performance appraisal is implemented in the
organization?
a) Merit b) Grading c) Training & Development D) Other
Merit 15 33%
Grading 10 28%
Other 13 29%
No. of Employees
29% Merit
33%
Grading
Training & Development
Other
16%
22%
Interpretation:
from the data collected as shown in the above diagram,33% employees are
Merit performance appraisal is implemented in the organization 28%
employees Grading, Training & Development 10% and 29% employees were
Other performance appraisal is implemented in the organization.
19
3) Do you think that performance appraisal helps to provide an
atmosphere where all are Encouraged to share one another burden.
a) Yes b) No
Yes 25 75%
No 20 25%
No. of Employees
44% Yes
56% No
Interpretation:
Maximum number of employees think that performance appraisal helps to
provide an Atmosphere where all are encouraged to share one another burden.
20
4) Do you think performance appraisal helps people set and achieve
meaningful goals?
a) Yes b) No
Yes 25 75%
No 20 25%
No. of Employees
44% Yes
56% No
Interpretation:
25% of employees thinks that performance appraisal helps people set and
achieve meaningful goals.
21
5) Do you think performance appraisal give constructive criticism in a
friendly and Positive manner?
a) Yes b) No
Yes 30 67%
No 15 33%
No. of Employees
33%
Yes
No
67%
Interpretation:
67% of employees give constructive criticism in a friendly and positive manner.
22
6) Do you think that performance of employees improves after process of
performance Appraisal?
a) yes b) No
Yes 25 56%
No 20 44%
No. of Employees
44% Yes
56% No
Interpretation:
56% of employees improve after process of performance appraisal.
23
7) Do you think performance appraisal improves motivation and job
satisfaction?
a) yes b) No
Yes 35 78%
No 10 22%
No. of Employees
22%
Yes
No
78%
Interpretation:
Maximum no. of employees is not satisfied with their motivational levels.
24
8) Top level management partial in performance appraisal at Thermax
Limited?
a) yes b) No
Yes 25 56%
No 20 44%
No. of Employees
44% Yes
56% No
Interpretation-
Around 56% of employees thinks their top-level management is partial in
performance Appraisal.
25
9) Do you think performance appraisal helps to change behaviour of
employees?
a) yes b) No
Yes 15 33%
No 30 67%
No. of Employees
Particular
No. of employees
33%
Yes
No
67%
Interpretation-
More than 67% employees are disagreed with 3 rounds of interview. According
to them its take too much time for acquisition.
26
10) In your opinion performance appraisal system of your organization is
related to which of are following?
a) Retention of employees b) Recruitment system c) organizational
culture d) Motivation
Motivation 15 34%
No. of Employees
22%
34% Retention of employees
Recruitment system
Organizational culture
22% Motivation
22%
Interpretation:
34% of the employees have their opinion of performance appraisal system of
organization is related to motivation.
27
6-Findings
28
Findings
As of my last update, I don't have access to specific studies or findings conducted
by Thermax Limited on performance appraisal. However, I can outline some
hypothetical findings based on common trends and challenges observed in
performance appraisal systems across organizations. Here are some potential
findings that Thermax Limited might encounter in a study on performance
appraisal:
➢ Performance Ratings Distribution:
The analysis reveals that performance ratings at Thermax Limited are skewed
towards the higher end of the scale, with a significant proportion of employees
receiving above-average ratings. This could suggest leniency or inflation in the
appraisal process.
➢ Departmental Disparities:
There are noticeable differences in performance ratings across departments,
with some departments consistently receiving higher ratings than others.
Further investigation might be warranted to understand the factors
contributing to these disparities, such as variations in job demands, leadership
styles, or resource allocation.
➢ Time Trends:
Analysis of performance ratings over multiple appraisal cycles shows
fluctuations in employee performance over time. Certain periods may exhibit a
higher concentration of top performers, while others show a more dispersed
distribution of ratings. Identifying the drivers of these temporal variations could
inform efforts to maintain consistency and fairness in the appraisal process.
➢ Correlation with Employee Tenure:
There is a positive correlation between employee tenure and performance
ratings, indicating that longer-tenured employees tend to receive higher ratings
on average. This finding raises questions about potential biases in the appraisal
process favouring seniority over actual performance, which could impact
morale and retention among newer employees.
29
➢ Feedback Quality:
Qualitative analysis of feedback provided by employees and managers
highlights recurring themes related to communication, goal alignment, and
developmental opportunities. While positive feedback is prevalent, there are
also concerns about the clarity and specificity of performance expectations, as
well as the consistency of feedback delivery across the organization.
➢ Managerial Influence:
Supervisors play a significant role in shaping employee performance ratings, as
evidenced by the correlation between supervisor ratings and overall
performance scores. However, there is variability in the effectiveness of
different managers in providing fair and constructive feedback, suggesting
potential opportunities for training and development in performance
management practices.
➢ Employee Engagement Impact:
Employees who perceive the performance appraisal process as fair and
transparent tend to report higher levels of job satisfaction and engagement.
Conversely, dissatisfaction with the appraisal process is associated with
decreased motivation and increased turnover intentions. This underscores the
importance of ensuring procedural fairness and communication in performance
management practices.
These findings are hypothetical and based on common patterns observed in
performance appraisal research. Actual findings in a study conducted by
Thermax Limited would depend on the specific context, methodology, and data
analysed.
Thermax emphasizes performance management: Their annual report
https://www.thermaxglobal.com/digital-annual-reports-2021-22/human-
capital.html mentions a focus on a "Performance Management System" with
elements like goal-setting, feedback conversations, and "CLOCC behaviours"
(Customer, Lead, Own, Create, Collaborate). This suggests a move towards a
more dynamic and development-oriented approach to performance.
30
Focus on continuous improvement: Thermax highlights their commitment to
"reinventing ourselves continually" https://www.thermaxglobal.com/digital-
annual-reports-2021-22/human-capital.html. This suggests they likely
regularly assess and improve their HR practices, including performance
appraisal methods.
➢ Here are some next steps to find more information:
Contact Thermax HR: You could try contacting Thermax's HR department
directly to inquire about any studies they've conducted on performance
appraisal.
Look for industry reports: Search for industry reports or publications related to
performance management practices in Indian companies. Thermax might be
featured as a case study.
Thermax's collaboration with IMERT: An IMERT (Institute of Management
Education Research and Training) report
https://mmimert.edu.in/index.php/research-publication/research fdp/world-
of-work/2-uncategorised/194-world-of-work-at-thermax mentions studying
Thermax's performance management system cycle. While it doesn't directly
focus on appraisals, it might offer clues about their approach.
31
7. Suggestions
32
Suggestions
Define Clear Objectives: Clearly outline the objectives of the study. Determine
what aspects of the performance appraisal system the study aims to evaluate or
improve, such as fairness, effectiveness, or alignment with organizational goals.
➢ Engage Stakeholders:
Involve key stakeholders, including employees, managers, HR professionals, and
senior leadership, in the design and implementation of the study. Their input
can provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the current
appraisal system.
➢ Review Existing Practices:
Conduct a comprehensive review of the current performance appraisal process,
including documentation, rating criteria, feedback mechanisms, and
performance management software/tools used. Identify any areas of
inconsistency, bias, or inefficiency that need to be addressed.
➢ Select Appropriate Metrics:
Choose relevant performance metrics and indicators to assess the effectiveness
of the performance appraisal system. These may include employee satisfaction
scores, turnover rates, performance improvement trends, and alignment with
organizational objectives.
➢ Collect Quality Data:
Ensure that data collection methods are robust and reliable. Use a combination
of quantitative data (e.g., performance ratings, numerical scores) and
qualitative data (e.g., employee feedback, open-ended survey responses) to
provide a comprehensive understanding of the appraisal process.
➢ Consider Multiple Perspectives:
Consider the perspectives of both appraisers (e.g., managers) and appraisees
(e.g., employees) when evaluating the performance appraisal system. Compare
perceptions and experiences across different organizational levels and
departments to identify common patterns or discrepancies.
33
➢ Implement Feedback Mechanisms:
Establish mechanisms for collecting feedback on the performance appraisal
process in real-time or at regular intervals. This could include anonymous
surveys, focus groups, or one-on-one interviews to gather candid input from
participants.
➢ Benchmark Against Best Practices:
Compare Thermax Limited's performance appraisal practices against industry
benchmarks and best practices. Identify leading organizations or research
studies that have implemented effective appraisal systems and consider
adopting relevant strategies or recommendations.
➢ Pilot Test Changes:
Before making significant changes to the performance appraisal system,
consider piloting proposed modifications on a small scale or in specific
departments. This allows for testing the effectiveness of new approaches and
gathering feedback before full implementation.
➢ Continuous Improvement:
Treat the study on performance appraisal as an ongoing process rather than a
one-time event. Continuously monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of
appraisal practices, solicit feedback from stakeholders, and make iterative
improvements based on findings and lessons learned.
34
8-Conclusion
35
Conclusion
36